SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION, USE OF ESTIMATES AND CONSOLIDATION
The Company has incurred net losses historically and has an accumulated deficit of $215,181 as of December 31, 2011. The Company also has significant contractual obligations related to its recourse and non-recourse debt for fiscal year 2012 and beyond. The Company may continue to generate net losses for the foreseeable future. Based on the Company’s cash position at December 31, 2011, and expected cash flows from operations, management believes that the Company has the ability to meet its obligations through at least December 31, 2012. Failure to generate additional revenues, raise additional capital or manage discretionary spending could have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2011, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared following the interim reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). They do not include all disclosures normally made in financial statements contained in the Form 10-K. In management’s opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, the results of operations and cash flows in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for the periods presented have been made. The results of operations for the respective interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on June 14, 2011 (the “Form 10-K”).
The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cinedigm, Access Digital Media, Inc. (“AccessDM”), Hollywood Software, Inc. d/b/a Cinedigm Software (“Software”), Core Technology Services, Inc. (“Managed Services”) (sold in August 2010), FiberSat Global Services, Inc. d/b/a Cinedigm Satellite and Support Services (“Satellite”), ADM Cinema Corporation (“ADM Cinema”) d/b/a the Pavilion Theatre (the “Pavilion Theatre”) (certain assets and liabilities sold in May 2011), Christie/AIX, Inc. d/b/a Cinedigm Digital Cinema (“Phase 1 DC”), PLX Acquisition Corp., UniqueScreen Media, Inc. (“USM”) (sold in September 2011), Vistachiara Productions, Inc. f/k/a The Bigger Picture, currently d/b/a Cinedigm Content and Entertainment Group (“CEG”), Access Digital Cinema Phase 2 Corp. (“Phase 2 DC”), Access Digital Cinema Phase 2 B/AIX Corp. (“Phase 2 B/AIX”) and Cinedigm Digital Funding I, LLC (“CDF I”). AccessDM and Satellite are together referred to as the Digital Media Services Division (“DMS”) (the majority of which was sold in November, 2011). All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The Company holds a 100% equity interest in CDF2 Holdings, LLC , which wholly owns Cinedigm Digital Funding 2, LLC (together, “CDF2”), which is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) as defined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810, “Consolidation". CDF2 commenced operations on October 18, 2011 and is in business to purchase and deploy digital projection systems to movie theatre auditoriums across the United States (See Note 6). CDF2 has entered into various finance agreements with multiple third parties unrelated to the Company to finance its business and has also entered into a management service agreement (“MSA”) with the Company for administrative services related to the installation of these digital systems and management of contracts and administrative services for CDF2. ASC 810 requires the consolidation of VIEs by the entity that has a controlling financial interest in the VIE which entity is thereby defined as the primary beneficiary of the VIE. To be a primary beneficiary, an entity must have the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance among other factors. During the current period, the Company assessed the variable interests in CDF2 and determined that the Company was not the primary beneficiary of CDF2 and is accounting for its investment in CDF2 under the equity method (See Note 6). In completing this assessment, the Company identified the activities that it considers most significant to the economic performance of CDF2 and determined that it does not have the power to direct those activities. Specifically, both the Company and a third party, which also has a variable interest in CDF2 must mutually approve all business activities and transactions that significantly impact CDF2's economic performance. As a result, CDF2 is not consolidated in the Company's results. The Company's maximum exposure to loss as it relates to CDF2 as of December 31, 2011 includes:
| |
• | The investment in the equity of CDF2 of $1,658; |
| |
• | Accounts receivable due from CDF2 for service fees under its MSA of $162; |
| |
• | Notes receivable for deferred installation fees under its MSA of $409. |
During the three and nine months ended December 31, the Company received $248 in aggregate revenues from CDF2, included in revenues on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Phase I Deployment and Phase II Deployment
Virtual print fees (“VPFs”) are earned pursuant to contracts with movie studios and distributors, whereby amounts are payable by a studio to Phase 1 DC, CDF I and to Phase 2 DC, when movies distributed by the studio are displayed on screens utilizing the Company’s Systems installed in movie theatres. VPFs are earned and payable to Phase 1 DC and CDF I based on a defined fee schedule with a reduced VPF rate year over year until the sixth year (calendar 2011) at which point the VPF rate remains unchanged through the tenth year. One VPF is payable for every digital title displayed per System. The amount of VPF revenue is dependent on the number of movie titles released and displayed using the Systems in any given accounting period. VPF revenue is recognized in the period in which the digital title first plays on a System for general audience viewing in a digitally-equipped movie theatre, as Phase 1 DC’s, CDF I’s and Phase 2 DC’s performance obligations have been substantially met at that time.
Phase 2 DC’s agreements with distributors require the payment of VPFs, according to a defined fee schedule, for ten years from the date each system is installed; however, Phase 2 DC may no longer collect VPFs once “cost recoupment,” as defined in the agreements, is achieved. Cost recoupment will occur once the cumulative VPFs and other cash receipts collected by Phase 2 DC have equaled the total of all cash outflows, including the purchase price of all Systems, all financing costs, all “overhead and ongoing costs”, as defined, and including the Company’s service fees, subject to maximum agreed upon amounts during the three-year rollout period and thereafter, plus a compounded return on any billed but unpaid overhead and ongoing costs, of 15% per year. Further, if cost recoupment occurs before the end of the eighth contract year, a one-time “cost recoupment bonus” is payable by the studios to the Company. Any other cash flows, net of expenses, received by Phase 2 DC following the achievement of cost recoupment are required to be returned to the distributors on a pro-rata basis. At this time, the Company cannot estimate the timing or probability of the achievement of cost recoupment.
Alternative content fees (“ACFs”) are earned pursuant to contracts with movie exhibitors, whereby amounts are payable to Phase 1 DC, CDF I and to Phase 2 DC, generally either a fixed amount or as a percentage of the applicable box office revenue derived from the exhibitor’s showing of content other than feature films, such as concerts and sporting events (typically referred to as “alternative content”). ACF revenue is recognized in the period in which the alternative content first opens for audience viewing.
Services
For software multi-element licensing arrangements that do not require significant production, modification or customization of the licensed software, revenue is recognized for the various elements as follows: revenue for the licensed software element is recognized upon delivery and acceptance of the licensed software product, as that represents the culmination of the earnings process and the Company has no further obligations to the customer, relative to the software license. Revenue earned from consulting services is recognized upon the performance and completion of these services. Revenue earned from annual software maintenance is recognized ratably over the maintenance term (typically one year). Revenues relating to customized software development contracts are recognized on a percentage-of-completion contract method of accounting using the cost to date to the total estimated total cost approach.
Revenue is deferred in cases where: (1) a portion or the entire contract amount cannot be recognized as revenue, due to non-delivery or pre-acceptance of licensed software or custom programming, (2) uncompleted implementation of application service provider arrangements (“ASP Service”), or (3) unexpired pro-rata periods of maintenance, minimum ASP Service fees or website subscription fees. As license fees, maintenance fees, minimum ASP Service fees and website subscription fees are often paid in advance, a portion of this revenue is deferred until the contract ends. Such amounts are classified as deferred revenue and are recognized as earned revenue in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policies described above.
Exhibitors who purchase and own Systems using their own financing in the Phase II Deployment, will pay an upfront activation fee of $2 thousand per screen to the Company (the “Exhibitor-Buyer Structure”). These upfront activation fees are recognized in the period in which these exhibitor owned Systems are ready for content, as the Company has no further obligations to the customer, and are typically paid from VPFs over approximately one year. Additionally, the Company recognizes activation fee revenue on Phase 2 DC Systems upon installation which revenue is generally collected upfront upon installation. The Company will then manage the billing and collection of VPFs and will remit all VPFs collected to the exhibitors, less an administrative fee that will approximate 7.5%-10% of the VPFs collected.
The administrative fee related to the Phase I Deployment approximates 5% of the VPFs collected. This administrative fee is recognized in the period in which the billing of VPFs occurs, as performance obligations have been substantially met at that time.
Content & Entertainment
CEG has contracts for the theatrical distribution of third party feature films and alternative content. CEG’s distribution fee revenue and CEG's participation in box office receipts is recognized at the time a feature film and alternative content is viewed. CEG has the right to receive or bill a portion of the theatrical distribution fee in advance of the exhibition date, and therefore such amount is recorded as a receivable at the time of execution, and all related distribution revenue is deferred until the third party feature films’ or alternative content’s theatrical release date.
Barter advertising revenue is recognized for the fair value of the advertising time surrendered in exchange for alternative content. The Company includes the value of such exchanges in both Content & Entertainment’s net revenues and direct operating costs. The Company has not had any barter advertising transactions since the nine months ended December 31, 2010 when $356 of net revenues and direct operating costs related to barter advertising were recognized.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses on accounts receivable. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to evaluate the adequacy of these reserves. Reserves are recorded primarily on a specific identification basis. Allowance for doubtful debts amounted to $53 and $73 as of December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively.
RESTRICTED AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE INVESTMENTS
In connection with the $75,000 Senior Secured Note issued in August 2009 (See Note 5), the Company was required to segregate a portion of the proceeds into marketable securities, which was used to pay interest over the first two years and segregate a portion of proceeds from sales activities into restricted use marketable securities. The Company classified these marketable securities as restricted available-for-sale investments and fully utilized these marketable securities to pay interest in September 2011. This segregated account has since been discontinued.
In connection with the $172,500 term loans issued in May 2010 (See Note 5), the sale of USM in September 2011 and the sale of the majority of assets of DMS in November 2011 (See Note 3), the Company segregated $9,475 of the combined proceeds received in the transactions into an account to be used with the approval of the 2010 Noteholder either (i) to support an acquisition by the Company; or (ii) to repay the 2010 Note.
Restricted available-for-sale investment securities with a maturity of twelve months or less are classified as short-term and investment securities with a maturity greater than twelve months are classified as long-term. These investments are recorded at fair value. As of December 31, 2011, there were no long-term restricted available-for-sale investments.
The changes in the value of these investments are included in Other (expense) income, net in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Realized gains and losses are recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations when securities mature or are redeemed as a component of other income (expense). No losses were realized or recognized during the three months ended December 31, 2011, and as of December 31, 2011 no unrealized amounts remain, as all such securities were converted to cash or cash equivalents during the preceding quarter. During the nine months ended December 31, 2011, a net loss of $22 was realized and recognized from these investments. During the three months ended December 31, 2010, the Company realized losses of $71.
The carrying value and fair value of restricted available-for-sale investments at December 31, 2011, consisting principally of money market and other cash equivalent funds, were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
Cash equivalent funds | | 9,475 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9,475 |
|
| | $ | 9,475 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 9,475 |
|
The carrying value and fair value of restricted available-for-sale investments at March 31, 2011 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
U.S. Treasury securities | | $ | 710 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (42 | ) | | $ | 668 |
|
Obligations of U.S. government agencies and FDIC guaranteed bank debt | | 1,270 |
| | — |
| | (51 | ) | | 1,219 |
|
Other interest bearing securities | | 4,595 |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | 4,593 |
|
| | $ | 6,575 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (95 | ) | | $ | 6,480 |
|
RESTRICTED CASH
In connection with the 2010 Term Loans issued in May 2010 (See Note 5), the Company maintains cash restricted for repaying interest on the Term Loans as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2011 | | As of March 31, 2011 |
Interest reserve account related to the 2010 Term Loans (See Note 5) | | $ | 5,753 |
| | $ | 5,751 |
|
DEFERRED COSTS
Deferred costs primarily consist of unamortized debt issuance costs which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective debt. The straight-line basis is not materially different from the effective interest method.
DIRECT OPERATING COSTS
Direct operating costs consist of facility operating costs such as rent, utilities, real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, insurance and other related expenses, direct personnel costs, and amortization of capitalized software development costs.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
For the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $561 and $285, respectively, and $1,479 and $1,579 for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the nine months ended December 31, 2010, certain stock-based awards were accelerated upon the retirement of the former CEO, which resulted in recognition of $266 of additional stock-based compensation expense. In addition to stock-based compensation, the Company incurred $142 and $704 of stock-based expenses for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2011, respectively related to directors' fees and independent third party strategic management services.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $1.37 and $1.00, respectively, and $1.77 and $0.91, for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No stock options were exercised during the three months, and 93,628 stock options were exercised during the nine months ended December 31, 2011, respectively, and there were no stock options exercised during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2010.
The Company estimated the fair value of stock options at the date of each grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following assumptions:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended December 31, | | For the Nine Months Ended December 31, |
Assumptions for Option Grants | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Range of risk-free interest rates | | 0.92-2.1% |
| | 1.4-2.1% |
| | 0.92-2.1% |
| | 1.4-2.2% |
|
Dividend yield | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Expected life (years) | | 5 |
| | 5 |
| | 5 |
| | 5 |
|
Range of expected volatilities | | 76.7-78.2% |
| | 78.7-78.8% |
| | 76.7-78.1% |
| | 78.5-78.8% |
|
The risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model for options granted under the Company’s stock option plan awards is the historical yield on U.S. Treasury securities with equivalent remaining lives. The Company does not currently anticipate paying any cash dividends on common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently, an expected dividend yield of zero is used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company estimates the expected life of options granted under the Company’s stock option plans using both exercise behavior and post-vesting termination behavior, as well as consideration of outstanding options. The Company estimates expected volatility for options granted under the Company’s stock option plans based on a measure of historical volatility in the trading market for the Company’s common stock.
Employee stock-based compensation expense related to the Company’s stock-based awards was as follows for the periods presented:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended December 31, | | For the Nine Months Ended December 31, |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Direct operating | | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 14 |
| | $ | 32 |
| | $ | 48 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | | 481 |
| | 259 |
| | 1,304 |
| | 1,492 |
|
Research and development | | 69 |
| | 12 |
| | 143 |
| | 39 |
|
| | $ | 561 |
| | $ | 285 |
| | $ | 1,479 |
| | $ | 1,579 |
|
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized; rather, they are tested for impairment on at least an annual basis. Intangible assets with finite lives, primarily customer relationships, non-compete agreements, patents and software technology, are amortized over their useful lives.
In order to test goodwill, a determination of the fair value of our reporting units is required and is based, among other things, on estimates of future operating performance of the reporting unit and/or the component of the entity being valued. The Company is required to complete an impairment test for goodwill and record any resulting impairment losses at least on an annual basis or more often if warranted by events or changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying value may exceed fair value (“impairment indicators”). This impairment test includes the projection and discounting of cash flows, analysis of our market factors impacting the businesses the Company operates and estimating the fair values of tangible and intangible assets and liabilities. Estimating future cash flows and determining their present values are based upon, among other things, certain assumptions about expected future operating performance and appropriate discount rates determined by management.
The Company’s process of evaluating goodwill for impairment involves the determination of fair value of its goodwill reporting units: Software and CEG. The Company conducts its annual goodwill impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, measured as of March 31, unless triggering events occur which require goodwill to be tested at another date.
Inherent in the fair value determination for each reporting unit are certain judgments and estimates relating to future cash flows, including management’s interpretation of current economic indicators and market conditions, and assumptions about the Company’s strategic plans with regard to its operations. To the extent additional information arises, market conditions change or the Company’s strategies change, it is possible that the conclusion regarding whether the Company’s remaining goodwill is impaired could change and result in future goodwill impairment charges that will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
The discounted cash flow methodology establishes fair value by estimating the present value of the projected future cash flows to be generated from the reporting unit. The discount rate applied to the projected future cash flows to arrive at the present value is intended to reflect all risks of ownership and the associated risks of realizing the stream of projected future cash flows. The discounted cash flow methodology uses our projections of financial performance for a five-year period. The most significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow methodology are the discount rate, the terminal value and expected future revenues and gross margins, which vary among reporting units. The discount rates utilized in conjunction with our last evaluations were 16.0% - 27.5% based on the estimated market participant weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) for each unit. The market participant based WACC for each unit gives consideration to factors including, but not limited to, capital structure, historic and projected financial performance, and size.
The market multiple methodology establishes fair value by comparing the reporting unit to other companies that are similar, from an operational or industry standpoint and considers the risk characteristics in order to determine the risk profile relative to the comparable companies as a group. The most significant assumptions are the market multiplies and the control premium. The Company has elected not to apply a control premium to the fair value conclusions for the purposes of impairment testing.
The Company then assigns a weighting to the discounted cash flows and market multiple methodologies to derive the fair value of the reporting unit. The income approach is weighted 70% and the market approach is weighted 30% to derive the fair value of the reporting unit. The weightings are evaluated each time a goodwill impairment assessment is performed and give consideration to the relative reliability of each approach at that time.
Information related to the goodwill allocated to the Company’s continuing operations is detailed below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Phase I | | Phase II | | Services | | Content & Entertainment | | Corporate | | Consolidated |
As of December 31, 2011 | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,197 |
| | 1,568 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,765 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2011 | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,197 |
| | 1,568 |
| | — |
| | $ | 5,765 |
|
The fair values derived in our impairment testing assume increases in revenue growth and profitability for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 and beyond and continued significant growth in revenue and profitability for the Services segment for fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 as a result of increased Systems for our Phase 2 Deployment. The number of Systems, and the use of alternative content on those Systems, are the primary revenue drivers for our goodwill reporting units. Growth in the number of deployed Systems is driven by many factors including audience demand for 3D content, the amount of digital content (including 3D and alternative content such as concerts and sporting events) being made available by the Hollywood studios and content owners, and the adoption rate of digital technology by exhibitors, all of which the Company sees as continuing its strong pace. The strong growth assumed, however, is the primary driver of the use of discount rates comparable to those typically applied to early-stage, venture capital backed companies.
During the three and nine months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, no impairment charge was recorded for goodwill related to the Company's continuing operations.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation expense is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the leasehold improvements. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred. Major renewals, improvements and additions are capitalized. Upon the sale or other disposition of any property and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts and the gain or loss on disposal is included in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, when events or conditions exist that indicate a possible impairment exists. The assessment for recoverability is based primarily on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets from expected future undiscounted net cash flows. If the total of expected future undiscounted net cash flows is less than the total carrying value of the assets the asset is deemed not to be recoverable and possibly impaired. The Company then estimates the fair value of the asset to determine whether an impairment loss should be recognized. An impairment loss will be recognized if the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined by computing the expected future discounted cash flows. During the three and nine months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, no impairment charge for long-lived assets was recorded.
As of December 31, 2011, the Company's finite-lived intangible assets consisted of customer relationships and agreements, theatre relationships, covenants not to compete, trade names and trademarks, which are estimated to have useful lives ranging from two to ten years. During the nine months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company acquired intangible assets of $35 and $33, respectively.
NET LOSS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted net loss per common share has been calculated as follows:
|
| |
Basic and diluted net loss per common share = | Net loss – preferred dividends |
| Weighted average number of common stock outstanding during the period |
Shares issued and any shares that are reacquired during the period are weighted for the portion of the period that they are outstanding.
The Company incurred net losses for each of the three and nine months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and, therefore, the impact of dilutive potential common shares from outstanding stock options, warrants, restricted stock, and restricted stock units, totaling 25,375,245 shares and 25,125,496 shares as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were excluded from the computation as it would be anti-dilutive.
ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE ACTIVITIES
Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value. In May 2010, the Company settled the interest rate swap in place with respect to its previous credit facility. In June 2010, the Company executed three separate interest rate swap agreements (the “Interest Rate Swaps”) to limit the Company’s exposure to changes in interest rates related to the 2010 Term Loans. Changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments are either recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss (a component of stockholders' equity) or in the condensed consolidated statement of operations depending on whether the derivative qualifies for hedge accounting. The Company has not sought hedge accounting treatment for these instruments and therefore, changes in the value of its Interest Rate Swaps were recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations (See Note 5).
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The fair value measurement disclosures are grouped into three levels based on valuation factors:
| |
• | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
| |
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, market corroborated inputs, etc.) |
| |
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Company’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis use the market approach, where prices and other relevant information are generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
The following tables summarize the levels of fair value measurements of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2011 |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 16,614 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 16,614 |
|
Restricted available-for-sale investments | | 9,475 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9,475 |
|
Restricted cash | | 5,753 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,753 |
|
Interest rate swaps | | — |
| | (1,943 | ) | | — |
| | (1,943 | ) |
| | $ | 31,842 |
| | $ | (1,943 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 29,899 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of March 31, 2011 |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 10,748 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 10,748 |
|
Restricted available-for-sale investments | | 668 |
| | 5,812 |
| | — |
| | 6,480 |
|
Restricted cash | | 5,751 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,751 |
|
Interest rate swaps | | — |
| | (1,971 | ) | | — |
| | (1,971 | ) |
| | $ | 17,167 |
| | $ | 3,841 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 21,008 |
|
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain reclassifications have been made to the fiscal year 2011 financial statements to conform to the current fiscal year 2012 presentation.