Document and Company Information(USD $)
In Billions, except Share data in Millions
YearEnded
Dec. 31, 2009
Jun. 30, 2009
Entity Registrant Name
BROADCOM CORP
Entity Central Index Key
0001054374
Document Type
10-K
Document Period End Date
12/31/2009
Amendment Flag
FALSE
Current Fiscal Year End Date
12/31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer
No
Entity Voluntary Filers
No
Entity Current Reporting Status
Yes
Entity Filer Category
Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Public Float
$10.8
Class A common stock, $.0001 par value: Authorized shares - 2,500,000 Issued and outstanding shares - 438,557 in 2009 and 426,095 in 2008
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding
438.6
Class B common stock, $.0001 par value: Authorized shares - 400,000 Issued and outstanding shares - 56,999 in 2009 and 62,923 in 2008
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding
57
Consolidated Balance Sheets(USD $)
In Thousands
Dec. 31, 2009
Dec. 31, 2008
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$1,397,093
$1,190,645
Short-term marketable securities
532,281
707,477
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,787 in 2009 and $5,354 in 2008)
508,627
372,311
Inventory
362,428
366,106
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
113,903
114,674
Total current assets
2,914,332
2,751,213
Property and equipment, net
229,317
234,691
Long-term marketable securities
438,616
0
Goodwill
1,329,614
1,279,243
Purchased intangible assets, net
150,927
61,958
Other assets
64,436
66,160
Total assets
5,127,242
4,393,265
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
437,353
310,487
Wages and related benefits
190,315
151,551
Deferred revenue and income
87,388
12,338
Accrued liabilities
433,294
242,727
Total current liabilities
1,148,350
717,103
Commitments and Contingencies
Long-term deferred revenue
608
3,898
Other long-term liabilities
86,438
65,197
Shareholders' equity:
Convertible preferred stock, $.0001 par value: Authorized shares - 6,432 - none issued and outstanding
0
0
Additional paid-in capital
11,153,060
10,930,315
Accumulated deficit
(7,259,069)
(7,324,330)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(2,195)
1,033
Total shareholders' equity
3,891,846
3,607,067
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
5,127,242
4,393,265
Class A common stock, $.0001 par value: Authorized shares - 2,500,000 Issued and outstanding shares - 438,557 in 2009 and 426,095 in 2008
Common stock
44
43
Class B common stock, $.0001 par value: Authorized shares - 400,000 Issued and outstanding shares - 56,999 in 2009 and 62,923 in 2008
Common stock
$6
$6
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical)(USD $)
In Thousands, except Per Share data
Dec. 31, 2009
Dec. 31, 2008
Current assets:
Allowance for doubtful accounts
$6,787
$5,354
Shareholders' equity:
Convertible preferred stock, par value
0.0001
0.0001
Convertible preferred stock, shares authorized
6,432
6,432
Convertible preferred stock, shares issued
0
0
Convertible preferred stock, shares outstanding
0
0
Class A common stock, $.0001 par value: Authorized shares - 2,500,000 Issued and outstanding shares - 438,557 in 2009 and 426,095 in 2008
Common stock, par value
0.0001
0.0001
Common stock, shares authorized
2,500,000
2,500,000
Common stock, shares issued
438,557
426,095
Common stock, shares outstanding
438,557
426,095
Class B common stock, $.0001 par value: Authorized shares - 400,000 Issued and outstanding shares - 56,999 in 2009 and 62,923 in 2008
Common stock, par value
0.0001
0.0001
Common stock, shares authorized
400,000
400,000
Common stock, shares issued
56,999
62,923
Common stock, shares outstanding
56,999
62,923
Consolidated Statements of Income(USD $)
In Thousands, except Per Share data
YearEnded
Dec.31,
2009
2008
2007
Net revenue:
Product revenue
$4,272,726
$4,485,239
$3,739,312
Income from Qualcomm Agreement (see Note 2)
170,611
0
0
Licensing revenue
46,986
172,886
37,083
Total net revenue
4,490,323
4,658,125
3,776,395
Costs and expenses:
Cost of product revenue
2,210,559
2,213,015
1,832,178
Research and development
1,534,918
1,497,668
1,348,508
Selling, general and administrative
479,362
543,117
492,737
Amortization of purchased intangible assets
14,548
3,392
1,027
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
18,895
171,593
1,500
Settlement costs, net
118,468
15,810
0
Restructuring costs (reversals)
7,501
(1,000)
0
In-process research and development
0
42,400
15,470
Charitable contribution
50,000
0
0
Total operating costs and expenses
4,434,251
4,485,995
3,691,420
Income from operations
56,072
172,130
84,975
Interest income, net
13,901
52,201
131,069
Other income (expense), net
2,218
(2,016)
3,412
Income before income taxes
72,191
222,315
219,456
Provision for income taxes
6,930
7,521
6,114
Net income
65,261
214,794
213,342
Net income per share (basic)
0.13
0.42
0.39
Net income per share (diluted)
0.13
0.41
0.37
Weighted average shares (basic)
494,038
512,648
542,412
Weighted average shares (diluted)
512,645
524,208
577,682
Consolidated Statements of Income (Stock-based Compensation Expense)(USD $)
In Thousands
YearEnded
Dec.31,
2009
2008
2007
Stock-based Compensation Expense Included in the Following:
Cost of product revenue
$24,545
$24,997
$26,470
Research and development
351,884
358,018
353,649
Selling, general and administrative
$119,918
$126,359
$139,533
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income(USD $)
In Thousands
Accumulated Deficit
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Additional Paid-In Capital
Common Stock
Total
1/1/2007 - 12/31/2007
Balance
$(7,757,202)
$(95)
$11,948,908
$55
$4,191,666
Balance, Shares
548,314
Cumulative effect to prior year accumulated deficit related to the adoption of FIN 48
4,736
4,736
Shares issued pursuant to stock awards, Shares
22,689
Shares issued pursuant to stock awards, net
234,616
234,616
Employee stock purchase plan, Shares
2,044
Employee stock purchase plan
55,350
55,350
Repurchases of Class A common stock, Shares
(35,789)
Repurchases of Class A common stock
(1,156,279)
(1)
(1,156,280)
Stock-based compensation expense
519,652
519,652
Stock option exchange
(26,205)
(26,205)
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities
Translation adjustments
(729)
(729)
Net income
213,342
213,342
Comprehensive income
212,613
Balance, Shares
537,258
Balance
(7,539,124)
(824)
11,576,042
54
4,036,148
1/1/2008 - 12/31/2008
Balance
(7,539,124)
(824)
11,576,042
54
4,036,148
Balance, Shares
537,258
Cumulative effect to prior year accumulated deficit related to the adoption of FIN 48
Shares issued pursuant to stock awards, Shares
12,573
Shares issued pursuant to stock awards, net
34,059
1
34,060
Employee stock purchase plan, Shares
4,413
Employee stock purchase plan
78,720
78,720
Repurchases of Class A common stock, Shares
(65,226)
Repurchases of Class A common stock
(1,267,880)
(6)
(1,267,886)
Stock-based compensation expense
509,374
509,374
Stock option exchange
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities
5,213
5,213
Translation adjustments
(3,356)
(3,356)
Net income
214,794
214,794
Comprehensive income
216,651
Balance, Shares
489,018
Balance
(7,324,330)
1,033
10,930,315
49
3,607,067
1/1/2009 - 12/31/2009
Balance
(7,324,330)
1,033
10,930,315
49
3,607,067
Balance, Shares
489,018
Cumulative effect to prior year accumulated deficit related to the adoption of FIN 48
Shares issued pursuant to stock awards, Shares
15,680
Shares issued pursuant to stock awards, net
59,054
1
59,055
Employee stock purchase plan, Shares
5,858
Employee stock purchase plan
85,491
85,491
Repurchases of Class A common stock, Shares
(15,000)
Repurchases of Class A common stock
(421,869)
(421,869)
Stock-based compensation expense
500,069
500,069
Stock option exchange
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities
(4,624)
(4,624)
Translation adjustments
1,396
1,396
Net income
65,261
65,261
Comprehensive income
62,033
Balance, Shares
495,556
Balance
$(7,259,069)
$(2,195)
$11,153,060
$50
$3,891,846
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows(USD $)
In Thousands
YearEnded
Dec.31,
2009
2008
2007
Operating activities
Net income
$65,261
$214,794
$213,342
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
74,435
78,236
64,082
Stock-based compensation expense:
Stock options and other awards
159,790
224,244
324,261
Restricted stock units
336,557
285,130
195,391
Acquisition-related items:
Amortization of purchased intangible assets
30,744
19,249
14,512
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
18,895
171,593
1,500
In-process research and development
0
42,400
15,470
Loss on strategic investments, net
0
4,266
1,809
Non-cash restructuring reversals, net
(1,944)
(1,000)
0
Loss (gain) on sale of marketable securities
(1,046)
1,781
0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
(131,656)
(3,294)
18,400
Inventory
12,013
(112,173)
(27,082)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
8,714
(11,273)
(59,691)
Accounts payable
122,985
616
13,698
Deferred revenue and income
71,760
(7,736)
22,099
Accrued settlement costs
170,500
(2,000)
(2,000)
Other accrued and long-term liabilities
49,885
14,782
29,526
Net cash provided by operating activities
986,893
919,615
825,317
Investing activities
Net purchases of property and equipment
(66,570)
(82,808)
(150,427)
Net cash paid for acquired companies
(165,258)
(170,541)
(219,324)
Sales (purchases) of strategic investments
(2,000)
(355)
312
Purchases of marketable securities
(1,138,681)
(1,115,704)
(667,384)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities
871,152
624,026
1,091,228
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
(501,357)
(745,382)
54,405
Financing activities
Repurchases of Class A common stock
(421,869)
(1,283,952)
(1,140,213)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
227,209
171,853
358,629
Minimum tax withholding paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units
(84,428)
(58,061)
(69,676)
Net cash used in financing activities
(279,088)
(1,170,160)
(851,260)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
206,448
(995,927)
28,462
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
1,190,645
2,186,572
2,158,110
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
1,397,093
1,190,645
2,186,572
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Income taxes paid
$16,747
$9,799
$6,463
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
1.   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Our Company
 
Broadcom Corporation (including our subsidiaries, referred to collectively in this Report as “Broadcom,” “we,” “our” and “us”) is a major technology innovator and global leader in semiconductors for wired and wireless communications. Our system-on-a-chip (SoC) and software solutions enable the delivery of voice, video, data and rich multimedia content to mobile devices, consumer electronics (CE) devices in the home and business networking products for the workplace, data centers, service providers and carriers. We provide the industry’s broadest portfolio of cutting-edge SoC solutions to manufacturers of computing and networking equipment, CE and broadband access products, and mobile devices.
 
Basis of Presentation
 
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Broadcom and our subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
In June 2009 the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, established the Accounting Standards Codification, or Codification, as the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB. The Codification is effective in the first interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and had no effect on our consolidated financial statements.
 
Certain prior period amounts in the consolidated statements of income have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation of the separate display of product revenue, income from the Qualcomm agreement and licensing revenue (see Note 2).
 
We have evaluated subsequent events through February 3, 2010, the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements (see Note 14).
 
Foreign Currency
 
The functional currency for most of our international operations is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency for a small number of our foreign subsidiaries is the local currency. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the exchange rates on the balance sheet dates. Revenues and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates prevailing during the year. Any translation adjustments resulting from this process are shown separately as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within shareholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are reported in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of total net revenue and expenses in the reporting periods. We regularly evaluate estimates and assumptions related to revenue recognition, rebates, allowances for doubtful accounts, sales returns and allowances, warranty reserves, inventory reserves, stock-based compensation expense, goodwill and purchased intangible asset valuations, strategic investments, deferred income tax asset valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, tax contingencies, self-insurance, restructuring costs (reversals), litigation and other loss contingencies. These estimates and assumptions are based on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the recording of revenue, costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results we experience may differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Our product revenue consists principally of sales of semiconductor devices and, to a lesser extent, software licenses and royalties, development, support and maintenance agreements, data services and cancellation fees. The majority of our product sales occur through the efforts of our direct sales force. The remaining balance of product sales occurs through distributors. Our licensing revenue and income from the Qualcomm Agreement is generated from the licensing of intellectual property.
 
The following table presents details of our total net revenue:
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
 
Product revenue
    95.2 %     96.3 %     99.0 %
Income from Qualcomm Agreement
    3.8              
Licensing revenue
    1.0       3.7       1.0  
                         
Total net revenue
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
                         
 
The following table presents details of our product revenue:
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
 
Product sales made through direct sales force
    78.8 %     83.6 %     85.0 %
Product sales made through distributors
    21.2       16.4       15.0  
                         
      100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
                         
 
Product Revenue
 
We recognize product revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. These criteria are usually met at the time of product shipment. However, we do not recognize revenue when any significant obligations remain. We record reductions of revenue for estimated product returns and pricing adjustments, such as competitive pricing programs and rebates, in the same period that the related revenue is recorded. The amount of these reductions is based on historical sales returns, analysis of credit memo data, specific criteria included in rebate agreements, and other factors known at the time. We accrue 100% of potential rebates at the time of sale and do not apply a breakage factor. We reverse the accrual for unclaimed rebate amounts as specific rebate programs contractually end or when we believe unclaimed rebates are no longer subject to payment and will not be paid. See Note 2 for a summary of our rebate activity.
 
A portion of our product sales is made through distributors under agreements allowing for pricing credits and/or rights of return. These pricing credits and/or right of return provisions prevent us from being able to reasonably estimate the final price of the inventory to be sold and the amount of inventory that could be returned pursuant to these agreements. As a result, the criterion listed in (iii) in the paragraph above has not been met at the time we deliver products to our distributors. Accordingly, product revenue from sales made through these distributors is not recognized until the distributors ship the product to their customers. We also maintain inventory, or hubbing, arrangements with certain of our customers. Pursuant to these arrangements we deliver products to a customer or a designated third party warehouse based upon the customers’ projected needs, but do not recognize product revenue unless and until the customer reports that it has removed our product from the warehouse to be incorporated into its end products.
 
In arrangements that include a combination of semiconductor products and software, where software is considered more-than-incidental and essential to the functionality of the product being sold, we account for the entire arrangement as a sale of software and software-related items and allocate the arrangement consideration based on vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE.
 
In arrangements that include a combination of semiconductor products, software and/or services, where software is not considered more-than-incidental to the product being sold, we allocate the arrangement consideration based on each element’s relative fair value.
 
In the arrangements described above, both the semiconductor products and software are delivered concurrently and post-contract customer support is not provided. Therefore, we recognize revenue upon shipment of the semiconductor product, assuming all other basic revenue recognition criteria are met, as both the semiconductor products and software are considered delivered elements and no undelivered elements exist. In limited instances where there are undelivered elements, we allocate revenue based on the relative fair value of the individual elements. If there is no established fair value for an undelivered element, the entire arrangement is accounted for as a single unit of accounting, resulting in a deferral of revenue and costs for the delivered element until the undelivered element has been fulfilled. In cases where the undelivered element is a data or support service, the revenue and costs applicable to both the delivered and undelivered elements are recorded ratably over the respective service period or estimated product life. If the undelivered element is essential to the functionality of the delivered element, no revenue or costs are recognized until the undelivered element is delivered.
 
Revenue from software licenses is recognized when all revenue recognition criteria are met and, if applicable, when VSOE exists to allocate the total license fee to each element of multiple-element software arrangements, including post-contract customer support. Post-contract support is recognized ratably over the term of the related contract. When a contract contains multiple elements wherein the only undelivered element is post-contract customer support and VSOE of the fair value of post-contract customer support does not exist, revenue from the entire arrangement is recognized ratably over the support period. Software royalty revenue is recognized based upon reports received from licensees during the period, unless collectibility is not reasonably assured, in which case revenue is recognized when payment is received from the licensee. Revenue from cancellation fees is recognized when cash is received from the customer.
 
Income from the Qualcomm Agreement
 
On April 26, 2009 we entered into a four-year Settlement and Patent License and Non-Assert Agreement, or the Qualcomm Agreement, with QUALCOMM Incorporated, or Qualcomm. The Qualcomm Agreement is a multiple element arrangement which includes: (i) an exchange of intellectual property rights, including in certain circumstances, by a series of covenants not to assert claims of patent infringement under future patents issued within one to four years of the execution date of the agreement, (ii) the assignment of certain existing patents by Broadcom to Qualcomm with Broadcom retaining a royalty-free license under these patents, and (iii) the settlement of all outstanding litigation and claims between us and Qualcomm. The proceeds of the Qualcomm Agreement were allocated amongst the principal elements of the transaction. A gain from the settlement of litigation was immediately recognized that approximates the value of awards determined by the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The remaining consideration was predominantly associated with the transfer of current and future intellectual property rights, as well as the settlement of all other outstanding litigation, and is being recognized over the performance period of four years as a single unit of accounting . See Note 2 for additional details of the Qualcomm Agreement.
 
Licensing of Intellectual Property
 
Revenue and related income from the licensing of intellectual property is recognized based upon either the performance period of the license or upon receipt of licensee reports as applicable in our various intellectual property arrangements.
 
Deferred Revenue and Income
 
We defer revenue and income when advance payments are received from customers before performance obligations have been completed and/or services have been performed. Deferred revenue and income do not include amounts from products delivered to distributors that the distributors have not yet sold through to their end customers.
 
Cost of Product Revenue
 
Cost of product revenue comprises the cost of our semiconductor devices, which consists of the cost of purchasing finished silicon wafers manufactured by independent foundries, costs associated with our purchase of assembly, test and quality assurance services and packaging materials for semiconductor products, as well as royalties paid to vendors for use of their technology. Also included in cost of product revenue is the amortization of purchased technology, and manufacturing overhead, including costs of personnel and equipment associated with manufacturing support, product warranty costs, provisions for excess and obsolete inventories, and stock-based compensation expense for personnel engaged in manufacturing support.
 
Concentration of Credit Risk
 
We sell the majority of our products throughout North America, Asia and Europe. Sales to our recurring customers are generally made on open account while sales to occasional customers are typically made on a prepaid or letter of credit basis. We perform periodic credit evaluations of our recurring customers and generally do not require collateral. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for potential credit losses, which losses historically have not been significant.
 
We invest our cash in U.S. Treasury instruments, in deposits and money market funds with major financial institutions and in commercial paper and corporate and agency bonds. We place our cash investments in instruments that meet high credit quality standards, as specified in our investment policy guidelines. These guidelines also limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issue, issuer or type of instrument. It is our policy to invest in instruments that have a final maturity of no longer than three years, with a portfolio weighted average maturity of no longer than 18 months.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
Our financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short- and long-term marketable securities, accounts receivable and accounts payable. Marketable securities consist of available-for-sale securities that are reported at fair value with the related unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax. The fair value of substantially all our cash equivalents and marketable securities is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The fair value of commercial paper included in cash equivalents was determined based on “Level 2” inputs, which were derived based on quoted prices for identical or similar assets, which had few transactions near the measurement period. We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective relatively short maturity dates or durations.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
We consider all highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into cash and have an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
 
Marketable Securities
 
Broadcom defines marketable securities as income yielding securities that can be readily converted into cash. Examples of marketable securities include U.S. Treasury and agency obligations, commercial paper, corporate notes and bonds, time deposits, foreign notes and certificates of deposit.
 
We account for our investments in debt and equity instruments as available-for-sale. Management determines the appropriate classification of such securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such classification as of each balance sheet date. Cash equivalents and marketable securities are reported at fair value with the related unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax. We assess whether our investments with unrealized loss positions are other than temporarily impaired. Unrealized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary are determined based on the specific identification method and are reported in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income.
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
We evaluate the collectibility of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In cases where we are aware of circumstances that may impair a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations subsequent to the original sale, we will record an allowance against amounts due, and thereby reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will be collected. For all other customers, we recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, industry and geographic concentrations, the current business environment and our historical experience.
 
Inventory
 
Inventory consists of work in process and finished goods and is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. We write down the carrying value of our inventory to net realizable value for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory in an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and its estimated realizable value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Shipping and handling costs are classified as a component of cost of product revenue in the consolidated statements of income. Inventory acquired through business combinations is recorded at its acquisition date fair value which is the net realizable value less a normal profit margin depending on the stage of inventory completion.
 
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives, ranging from one to ten years. Depreciation and amortization of leasehold improvements are computed using the shorter of the remaining lease term or ten years.
 
Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets
 
Goodwill is recorded as the difference, if any, between the aggregate consideration paid for an acquisition and the fair value of the acquired net tangible and intangible assets. Effective January 1, 2009 in-process research and development, or IPR&D, and defensive assets acquired are capitalized.
 
Other long-lived assets primarily represent rights acquired under developed technology, customer relationships and IPR&D. We currently amortize our intangible assets with definitive lives over periods ranging from one to fifteen years using a method that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed or otherwise used up or, if that pattern can not be reliably determined, using a straight-line amortization method. We capitalize IPR&D projects. On completion of each project, IPR&D assets will be amortized over their estimated useful lives. If any of the projects are abandoned, we would be required to impair the related IPR&D asset.
 
Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets
 
We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis in the fourth quarter or more frequently if we believe indicators of impairment exist. The performance of the test involves a two-step process. The first step of the impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values, including goodwill. We generally determine the fair value of our reporting units using the income approach methodology of valuation that includes the discounted cash flow method as well as other generally accepted valuation methodologies. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, we perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss. The second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill.
 
We test for the impairment of long-lived assets, including other purchased intangible assets, when indicators of impairment, such as reductions in demand, the abandonment of IPR&D projects or significant economic slowdowns in the semiconductor industry, are present. Reviews are performed to determine whether the carrying value of an asset is impaired, based on comparisons to undiscounted expected future cash flows. If this comparison indicates that there is impairment, the impaired asset is written down to fair value, which is typically calculated using: (i) quoted market prices or (ii) discounted expected future cash flows utilizing an appropriate discount rate. Impairment is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.
 
Warranty
 
Our products typically carry a one to three year warranty. We establish reserves for estimated product warranty costs at the time revenue is recognized based upon our historical warranty experience, and additionally for any known product warranty issues. If actual costs differ from our initial estimates, we record the difference in the period it is identified. Actual claims are charged against the warranty reserve. See Note 2 for a summary of our warranty activity.
 
Guarantees and Indemnifications
 
In some agreements to which we are a party, we have agreed to indemnify the other party for certain matters such as product liability. We include intellectual property indemnification provisions in our standard terms and conditions of sale for our products and have also included such provisions in certain agreements with third parties. We have and will continue to evaluate and provide reasonable assistance for these other parties. This may include certain levels of financial support to minimize the impact of the litigation in which they are involved. To date, there have been no known events or circumstances that have resulted in any material costs related to these indemnification provisions and no liabilities therefor have been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. However, the maximum potential amount of the future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification obligations could be significant.
 
For further discussion of our obligations under our directors’ and officers’ indemnification arrangements and insurance policies and litigation matters, see Notes 6 and 11.
 
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations
 
We account for asset retirement obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or normal use of the assets and the related asset retirement costs by recording the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, our net asset retirement obligation was $2.8 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
 
Income Taxes
 
We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, under which deferred taxes are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using tax rates expected to be in effect during the years in which the basis differences reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
 
Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold to be recognized. Income tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. We recognize potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the consolidated statements of income as income tax expense.
 
Research and Development Expense
 
Research and development expenditures are expensed in the period incurred.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
Broadcom has in effect stock incentive plans under which incentive stock options have been granted to employees and restricted stock units and non-qualified stock options have been granted to employees and non-employee members of the Board of Directors. We also have an employee stock purchase plan for all eligible employees. We are required to estimate the fair value of share-based awards on the date of grant. The value of the award is principally recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service periods. The fair value of our restricted stock units is based on the closing market price of our Class A common stock on the date of grant. We have estimated the fair value of stock options and stock purchase rights as of the date of grant or assumption using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which was developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and that are freely transferable. The Black-Scholes model considers, among other factors, the expected life of the award and the expected volatility of our stock price. We evaluate the assumptions used to value stock options and stock purchase rights on a quarterly basis. The fair values generated by the Black-Scholes model may not be indicative of the actual fair values of our equity awards, as it does not consider other factors important to those awards to employees, such as continued employment, periodic vesting requirements and limited transferability.
 
Litigation and Settlement Costs
 
Legal costs are expensed as incurred. We are involved in disputes, litigation and other legal actions in the ordinary course of business. We record a charge equal to at least the minimum estimated liability for a loss contingency when both of the following conditions are met: (i) information available prior to issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date of the financial statements and (ii) the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. This generally occurs when an agreement in principle has been reached by both parties that includes substantive terms, conditions and amounts.
 
Self-Insurance
 
We are self-insured for certain healthcare benefits provided to our U.S. employees. The liability for the self-insured benefits is limited by the purchase of stop-loss insurance. The stop-loss coverage provides payment for aggregate claims exceeding $0.3 million per covered person for any given year.
 
Accruals for losses are made based on our claim experience and actuarial estimates based on historical data. Actual losses may differ from accrued amounts. Should actual losses exceed the amounts expected and if the recorded liabilities are insufficient, an additional expense will be recorded.
 
Accumulated Comprehensive Income
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) includes foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains or losses on investments. This information is provided in our statements of shareholders’ equity. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 represents accumulated translation adjustments and unrecognized gains and losses on investments.
 
Net Income Per Share
 
Net income per share (basic) is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Net income per share (diluted) is calculated by adjusting outstanding shares, assuming any dilutive effects of options and restricted stock units calculated using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, an increase in the fair market value of our Class A common stock results in a greater dilutive effect from outstanding options, stock purchase rights and restricted stock units. Additionally, the exercise of employee stock options and stock purchase rights and the vesting of restricted stock units results in a further dilutive effect on net income per share.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In December 2007 the FASB issued Accounting Standard, or AS, Topic 805, Business Combinations, or AS 805, which established principles and requirements for the acquirer of a business to recognize and measure in its financial statements the identifiable assets (including in-process research and development and defensive assets) acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. AS 805 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Prior to the adoption of AS 805, in-process research and development costs were immediately expensed and acquisition costs were capitalized. Under AS 805 all acquisition costs are expensed as incurred. The standard also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. In April 2009 the FASB updated AS 805 to amend the provisions for the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosures for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. This update also eliminates the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies. The effect of AS 805 is reflected in our 2009 consolidated financial statements. We expect AS 805 will have an impact on our future consolidated financial statements, but the nature and magnitude of the specific effects will depend upon the nature, terms and size of the acquisitions we consummate in the future.
 
In September 2009 the FASB reached a consensus on Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, or ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14, Software (Topic 985) — Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, or ASU 2009-14. ASU 2009-13 modifies the requirements that must be met for an entity to recognize revenue from the sale of a delivered item that is part of a multiple-element arrangement when other items have not yet been delivered. ASU 2009-13 eliminates the requirement that all undelivered elements must have either: i) VSOE or ii) third-party evidence, or TPE, before an entity can recognize the portion of overall arrangement consideration that is attributable to items that already have been delivered. In the absence of VSOE or TPE of the standalone selling price for one or more delivered or undelivered elements in a multiple-element arrangement, entities will be required to estimate the selling prices of those elements. Overall arrangement consideration will be allocated to each element (both delivered and undelivered items) based on their relative selling prices, regardless of whether those selling prices are evidenced by VSOE or TPE or are based on the entity’s estimated selling price. The residual method of allocating arrangement consideration has been eliminated. ASU 2009-14 modifies the software revenue recognition guidance to exclude from its scope tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver a product’s essential functionality. These new updates are effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of these ASUs will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Supplemental Financial Information
Supplemental Financial Information
 
2.   Supplemental Financial Information
 
Inventory
 
The following table presents details of our inventory:
 
                 
    December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Work in process
  $ 157,148     $ 166,811  
Finished goods
    205,280       199,295  
                 
    $ 362,428     $ 366,106  
                 
 
Property and Equipment
 
The following table presents details of our property and equipment:
 
                         
          December 31,  
    Useful Life     2009     2008  
    (In years)     (In thousands)  
 
Leasehold improvements
    1 to 10     $ 163,302     $ 154,594  
Office furniture and equipment
    3 to 7       26,382       25,059  
Machinery and equipment
    3 to 5       235,142       193,993  
Computer software and equipment
    2 to 4       122,213       113,501  
Construction in progress
    N/A       6,666       3,893  
                         
              553,705       491,040  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
            (324,388 )     (256,349 )
                         
            $ 229,317     $ 234,691  
                         
 
In 2009 and 2008, we disposed of property and equipment with net book values of $2.6 million and $3.8 million, respectively. In addition, we wrote down $0.3 million and $19.8 million of property and equipment primarily included in our Mobile Platforms reporting unit in 2009 and 2008, respectively. See Note 9.
 
Goodwill
 
The following table summarizes the activity related to the carrying value of our goodwill:
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
          (In thousands)        
 
Beginning balance
  $ 1,279,243     $ 1,376,721     $ 1,185,145  
Goodwill recorded in connection with acquisitions (Note 3)
    52,512       43,891       196,019  
Contingent consideration
          10,000       10,155  
Impairment of goodwill
          (149,658 )      
Escrow related and other
    (2,141 )     (1,711 )     (14,598 )
                         
Ending balance
  $ 1,329,614     $ 1,279,243     $ 1,376,721  
                         
 
For a detailed discussion of our annual impairment assessment of goodwill, see Note 9.
 
Purchased Intangible Assets
 
The following table presents details of our purchased intangible assets:
 
                                                 
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2009     2008  
          Accumulated
                Accumulated
       
    Gross     Amortization(1)     Net     Gross     Amortization     Net  
    (In thousands)  
 
Developed technology
  $ 278,297     $ (207,517 )   $ 70,780     $ 220,669     $ (190,074 )   $ 30,595  
In-process research and development
    50,860             50,860                    
Customer relationships
    107,366       (79,212 )     28,154       80,366       (50,558 )     29,808  
Customer backlog
    3,736       (3,736 )           3,436       (3,436 )      
Other
    9,214       (8,081 )     1,133       9,214       (7,659 )     1,555  
                                                 
    $ 449,473     $ (298,546 )   $ 150,927     $ 313,685     $ (251,727 )   $ 61,958  
                                                 
 
 
(1) Included in accumulated amortization in 2009 is an impairment charge of $16.1 million related to the acquisition of the DTV Business of AMD. The primary factor contributing to this impairment charge was the continued reduction in our revenue outlook for this business.
 
The following table presents details of the amortization of purchased intangible assets included in the cost of product revenue and other operating expense categories:
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
    (In thousands)  
 
Cost of product revenue
  $ 16,196     $ 15,857     $ 13,485  
Other operating expenses
    14,548       3,392       1,027  
                         
    $ 30,744     $ 19,249     $ 14,512  
                         
 
The following table presents details of estimated future amortization of existing purchased intangible assets, including IPR&D. If we acquire additional purchased intangible assets in the future, our cost of product revenue or operating expenses will be increased by the amortization of those assets.
 
                                                         
    Purchased Intangible Assets Amortization by Year  
    2010     2011     2012     2013     2014     Thereafter     Total  
    (In thousands)  
 
Cost of product revenue
  $ 23,676     $ 22,674     $ 27,067     $ 22,125     $ 12,454     $ 13,644     $ 121,640  
Other operating expenses
    4,598       3,513       3,346       3,013       3,013       11,804       29,287  
                                                         
    $ 28,274     $ 26,187     $ 30,413     $ 25,138     $ 15,467     $ 25,448     $ 150,927  
                                                         
 
Accrued Liabilities
 
The following table presents details of our accrued liabilities:
 
                 
    December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Accrued rebates
  $ 162,212     $ 125,058  
Accrued settlement charges
    176,707       6,207  
Accrued legal costs
    36,739       26,973  
Accrued taxes
    13,854       15,924  
Warranty reserve
    10,430       11,473  
Qualcomm royalty payments
          25,467  
Restructuring liabilities
    1,328       3,342  
Other
    32,024       28,283  
                 
    $ 433,294     $ 242,727  
                 
 
Other Long-Term Liabilities
 
The following table presents details of our long-term liabilities:
 
                 
    December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Deferred rent
  $ 32,931     $ 32,594  
Accrued taxes
    24,919       26,190  
Deferred tax liabilities
    22,722        
Restructuring liabilities
          837  
Other long-term liabilities
    5,866       5,576  
                 
    $ 86,438     $ 65,197  
                 
 
Accrued Rebate Activity
 
The following table summarizes the 2009 and 2008 activity related to accrued rebates:
 
                 
    Year Ended
 
    December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Beginning balance
  $ 125,058     $ 132,603  
Charged as a reduction to revenue
    311,738       236,415  
Reversal of unclaimed rebates
    (10,479 )     (39,640 )
Payments
    (264,105 )     (204,320 )
                 
Ending balance
  $ 162,212     $ 125,058  
                 
 
Warranty Reserve Activity
 
The following table summarizes the 2009 and 2008 activity related to the warranty reserve:
 
                 
    Year Ended
 
    December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Beginning balance
  $ 11,473     $ 23,287  
Charged to costs and expenses
    5,918       4,998  
Reversal of warranty reserves(1)
    (1,572 )     (10,600 )
Payments
    (5,389 )     (6,212 )
                 
Ending balance
  $ 10,430     $ 11,473  
                 
 
 
(1) Relates to warranty costs incurred at a rate less than previously estimated.
 
Restructuring Activity
 
In light of the deterioration in worldwide economic conditions, in January 2009 we implemented a restructuring plan that included a reduction in our worldwide headcount of 200 people, which represented 3% of our global workforce. In September 2009 we implemented a plan to reduce our headcount by an additional 120 people related to our DTV business which included in our Broadband Communications reportable segment. These reductions in headcount were completed in 2009.
 
We recorded $7.5 million in net restructuring costs in 2009 primarily for severance and other charges associated with our reduction in workforce across multiple locations and functions and, to a lesser extent, the closure of one of our facilities. Included in the 2009 net restructuring expense were charges of $3.7 million related to stock-based compensation expense incurred in connection with the modification of certain share-based awards.
 
The following table summarizes activity related to our current restructuring liabilities:
 
         
    Total  
 
Restructuring liabilities at December 31, 2006
  $ 10,723  
Liabilities assumed in acquisitions
    749  
Cash payments(1)
    (4,015 )
         
Restructuring liabilities at December 31, 2007
    7,457  
Reversal of restructuring costs
    (1,000 )
Cash payments(1)
    (2,278 )
         
Restructuring liabilities at December 31, 2008
    4,179  
Charged to expense
    13,167  
Reversal of restructuring costs(2)
    (5,666 )
Non-cash costs
    (3,722 )
Cash payments(1)(2)
    (6,630 )
         
Restructuring liabilities at December 31, 2009
  $ 1,328  
         
 
 
(1) Cash payments related to severance and fringe benefits, net lease payments on excess facilities, lease terminations and non-cancelable lease costs. The consolidation of excess facilities costs will be paid over the respective lease terms through 2010.
 
(2) We reversed restructuring costs of $4.2 million as part of a contractual obligation due from AMD to reimburse us for certain restructuring actions taken during a stipulated post-acquisition period. This amount was received in January 2010.
 
Computation of Net Income Per Share
 
The following table presents the computation of net income per share:
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
    (In thousands, except per share data)  
 
Numerator: Net income
  $ 65,261     $ 214,794     $ 213,342  
                         
Denominator: Weighted average shares outstanding
    494,114       512,741       542,485  
Less: Unvested common shares outstanding
    (76 )     (93 )     (73 )
                         
Denominator for net income per share (basic)
    494,038       512,648       542,412  
Effect of dilutive securities:
                       
Unvested common shares outstanding
    31       4       8  
Stock awards
    18,576       11,556       35,262  
                         
Denominator for net income per share (diluted)
    512,645       524,208       577,682  
                         
Net income per share (basic)
  $ 0.13     $ 0.42     $ 0.39  
                         
Net income per share (diluted)
  $ 0.13     $ 0.41     $ 0.37  
                         
 
Net income per share (diluted) does not include the effect of anti-dilutive common share equivalents resulting from outstanding equity awards. There were 73.2 million, 127.5 million and 54.8 million anti-dilutive common share equivalents in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
 
Income from the Qualcomm Agreement
 
As part of the Qualcomm Agreement, each party granted certain rights under its patent portfolio to the other party including, in certain circumstances, under future patents issued within one to four years after April 26, 2009. The term of the Qualcomm Agreement commenced April 26, 2009 and will continue until the expiration of the last to expire of the covered patents. In addition, certain existing patents were assigned by Broadcom to Qualcomm with Broadcom retaining a royalty-free license under these patents. The Qualcomm Agreement also resulted in the parties dismissing with prejudice all outstanding litigation between them, and in Broadcom withdrawing its complaints with foreign competition authorities.
 
Under the terms of the agreement, Qualcomm is expected to make payments to Broadcom totaling $891.2 million, of which $286.4 million has been paid through December 31, 2009. The remaining balance of $604.8 million is expected to be paid in fourteen equal and successive quarterly payments of $43.2 million each, continuing in the three months ending March 31, 2010 and concluding in the three months ending June 30, 2013.
 
We allocated the payment due us under the Qualcomm Agreement amongst several elements. In 2009 we recorded a gain from the settlement of litigation related to intellectual property of $65.3 million, which approximated the value of the settlements determined by the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
 
The fair value associated with the transfer of intellectual property rights, as well as the settlement of other outstanding litigation, of $825.9 million, will be treated as a single unit of accounting and recognized within net revenue over the Qualcomm Agreement’s performance period of four years; however it will be limited to the lesser of the cumulative straight-line amortization over the four year performance period or the cumulative cash proceeds received. As a result, income from the Qualcomm Agreement will never be recorded ahead of cash payments received. In 2009 we recognized income from the Qualcomm Agreement of $140.1 million. We also recognized income from the Qualcomm Agreement of $30.5 million in 2009 related to previous payments made to us by Qualcomm for shipments from May 2007 through December 31, 2008, related to a court-ordered permanent injunction. We had deferred the recognition of these amounts, which were received during 2008, due to continuing litigation appeals. These appeals were resolved through the Qualcomm Agreement.
 
Income from the Qualcomm Agreement is expected to be recognized as follows:
 
                                                 
    2010   2011   2012   2013   Thereafter   Total
    (In thousands)
 
Income from Qualcomm Agreement
  $ 206,695     $ 206,695     $ 186,012     $ 86,400     $     $ 685,802  
 
At December 31, 2009 we had deferred income of $81.0 million related to the Qualcomm Agreement related to the initial payment by Qualcomm of $200.0 million in April 2009.
 
Intellectual Property Licensing Agreements
 
In July 2007 we entered into a patent license agreement with Verizon Wireless, a wireless network operator. Under the terms of the agreement, royalty payments were made to us at a rate of $6.00 per unit for each applicable unit sold by the operator on or after the date of the agreement, subject to certain conditions, including without limitation a maximum payment of $40.0 million per calendar quarter and a lifetime maximum of $200.0 million. We recorded licensing revenue of $19.0 million, $149.2 million and $31.8 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, under this agreement and recorded a cumulative total of $200.0 million in licensing revenue from the commencement of the agreement through March 31, 2009. To a much lesser extent, we have also recorded revenue in connection with other licensing agreements.
 
Charitable Contribution
 
In 2009 we established the Broadcom Foundation, or the Foundation, to support mathematics and science programs, as well as a broad range of community services. We received a determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service of exemption from federal income taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. We recorded an operating expense of $50.0 million related to our unrestricted grant to the Foundation.
 
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
 
In 2008 we paid $16.1 million related to 2007 share repurchases that had not settled by December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2009 and 2008 there were no unsettled share repurchases. At December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 we had billings of $7.6 million, $5.4 million and $9.2 million, respectively, for capital equipment that were accrued. The amounts accrued for capital equipment purchases have been excluded from the consolidated statements of cash flows and were paid in the subsequent period.
Business Combinations
Business Combinations
 
3.   Business Combinations
 
From January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2009 we completed several acquisitions. The consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of these acquired companies commencing as of their respective acquisition dates.
 
In December 2009 we acquired Dune Networks, Inc., which specializes in the design of switch fabric solutions for data center networking equipment, for $185.4 million, exclusive of $27.8 million of cash acquired. We issued 0.5 million restricted stock units to certain former employees of Dune Networks who became employees of Broadcom upon the closing. We did not assume any of Dune Network’s equity awards. The restricted stock units had a fair value of $13.9 million, of which $0.9 million was recorded as goodwill, in exchange for all of the outstanding and unvested stock options which will be recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the next four years. In addition, we recorded a settlement cost of $12.1 million related to a payment to the Israeli government associated with a post-acquisition technology transfer fee. We also made three additional acquisitions in 2009 totaling $12.1 million, which includes contingent consideration of $1.5 million relating to certain performance goals.
 
In October 2008 we acquired certain assets of the digital TV business of Advance Micro Devices, Inc., or DTV Business of AMD, which designs and markets applications and communications processors for the digital television market, for $140.7 million. Broadcom issued 1.2 million restricted stock units with a fair value of $19.7 million to certain former employees of AMD, who became employees of Broadcom upon the closing. We did not assume any of AMD’s equity awards. In 2009 we received $2.1 million from AMD for a final purchase price adjustment.
 
In February 2008 we acquired Sunext Design, Inc, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sunext Technology Corporation, Ltd., which specializes in the design of optical storage semiconductor products, for $9.9 million. In connection with our acquisition of Sunext Design, Inc., we were required to pay up to an additional $38.0 million in license fees and royalties related to optical disk reader and writer technology, assuming Sunext Technology successfully delivered the technologies as defined in a separate license agreement. We have paid $34.0 million related to these technologies and prepaid royalties, which concludes our obligations to purchase technology under the terms of the agreement.
 
In July 2007 we acquired Global Locate, Inc., a privately-held, fabless provider of industry-leading global positioning system and assisted GPS semiconductor products and software, for $139.7 million. In connection with our acquisition of Global Locate, Inc. in 2007, additional cash consideration of up to $80.0 million could have been paid to the former holders of Global Locate capital stock and other rights upon satisfaction of certain future performance goals. We previously paid $20.2 million in 2007 and 2008 to the former holders of Global Locate capital stock and other rights upon satisfaction of certain performance goals. The time remaining for completion of the other performance goals has expired and no future payments are expected.
 
In May 2007 we acquired Octalica, Inc., a privately-held fabless semiconductor company that specializes in the design and development of networking technologies based on the MoCA standard, which enables distribution of high quality multimedia content throughout the home over existing coaxial cable, for $30.8 million. In January 2007 we acquired LVL7 Systems, Inc., a privately-held developer of production-ready networking software that enables networking original equipment manufacturers and original design manufacturers to reduce development expenses and compress development timelines, for $62.5 million.
 
Certain of the cash consideration in the above acquisitions is currently held in escrow pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreements and is reflected in goodwill as we believe the likelihood of the escrow fund being utilized by us is remote.
 
Our primary reasons for the above acquisitions were to enter into or expand our market share in the relevant wired and wireless communications markets, reduce the time required to develop new technologies and products and bring them to market, incorporate enhanced functionality into and complement our existing product offerings, augment our engineering workforce, and enhance our technological capabilities. The principal factor that resulted in recognition of goodwill was that the purchase price for each acquisition was based on cash flow projections assuming the integration of any acquired technology and products with our products, which is of considerably greater value than utilizing each acquired company’s technology or product on a standalone basis.
 
We allocated the purchase price of each of these acquisitions to tangible assets, liabilities and identifiable intangible assets acquired, as well as IPR&D, if identified, based on their estimated fair values. The excess of each purchase price over the aggregate fair values was recorded as goodwill. The fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired was based on estimates and assumptions made by management. Intangible Assets, including IPR&D, are amortized on a straight-line basis over their respective useful lives.
 
We calculated the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired to allocate the purchase prices on the respective acquisition dates. Based upon those calculations, the purchase prices for the acquisitions were allocated as follows:
 
                         
    2009
    2008
    2007
 
    Acquisitions     Acquisitions     Acquisitions  
    (In thousands)  
 
Fair Market Values
                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 27,799     $ 299     $ 3,519  
Accounts receivable, net
    4,660       13       4,581  
Inventory
    8,335       22,620       1,437  
Prepaid and other current assets
    1,458       5,806       900  
Property and equipment, net
    833       4,381       2,051  
Other assets
    156       1,492       11  
Goodwill
    52,512       43,891       196,019  
Purchased intangible assets
    135,788       77,000       43,660  
                         
Total assets acquired
    231,541       155,502       252,178  
Accounts payable
    (1,691 )     (34 )     (5,807 )
Wages and related benefits
    (2,889 )     (1,496 )     (1,746 )
Accrued liabilities
    (29,429 )     (746 )     (8,430 )
Acquisition related Liabilities
          (2,541 )     (2,863 )
Long-term liabilities
                (389 )
                         
Total liabilities assumed
    (34,009 )     (4,817 )     (19,235 )
                         
Purchase price allocation
  $ 197,532     $ 150,685     $ 232,943  
                         
 
                                 
    Useful
    2009
    2008
    2007
 
    Life     Acquisitions     Acquisitions     Acquisitions  
    (In years)           (In thousands)        
 
Purchased intangible Assets:
                               
Developed technology
    1 - 15     $ 57,628     $ 1,900     $ 28,070  
In-process research and development
    2 - 10       50,860       42,400       15,470  
Customer relationships
    4 - 7       27,000       31,100        
Other
    1 - 4       300       1,600       120  
                                 
            $ 135,788     $ 77,000     $ 43,660  
                                 
 
Goodwill also increased by $10.0 million and $10.2 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively, upon the satisfaction of certain performance goals related to our Global Locate acquisition.
 
Purchased Intangible Assets
 
Developed technology represents core technology and completed technology. Core technology represents the fundamental technology that survives multiple product iterations that has passed technological feasibility. We generally use a relief-from-royalty method to value core technology, based on market royalties for similar fundamental technologies. The relief-from-royalty method estimates the cost savings that accrue to the owner of an intangible asset that would otherwise be payable as royalties or license fees on revenues earned through the use of the asset. The royalty rate used is based on an analysis of empirical, market-derived royalty rates for guideline intangible assets. Typically, revenue is projected over the expected remaining useful life of the completed technology. The market-derived royalty rate is then applied to estimate the royalty savings. Completed technology is specific to certain products acquired that have also passed technological feasibility. We generally use a multi-period excess earnings approach to value completed technology. The multi-period excess earnings approach calculates the value based on the risk adjusted present value of the cash flows specific to the products, allowing for a reasonable return.
 
Customer relationships represent future projected revenue that will be derived from sales of future versions of existing products to existing customers.
 
In-Process Research and Development
 
In 2009 we capitalized $50.9 million of IPR&D costs primarily related to our acquisition of Dune Networks, Inc. in accordance with accounting standards that became effective in 2009. Upon completion of each project, the related IPR&D assets will be amortized over their estimated useful lives. If any of the projects are abandoned, we will be required to impair the related IPR&D asset. We expensed $42.4 million and $15.5 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively, related to in-process research and development costs related to our acquisitions of Sunext Design, Inc. and the DTV Business of AMD in 2008 and LVL7 Systems, Inc., Octalica, Inc. and Global Locate, Inc. in 2007. Through 2008 the amounts allocated to IPR&D were determined through established valuation techniques used in the high technology industry and were expensed upon acquisition under then prevailing accounting standards as it was determined that the underlying projects had not reached technological feasibility and no alternative future uses existed.
 
The fair value of the IPR&D for each of the acquisitions was determined using the income approach. Under the income approach, the expected future cash flows from each project under development are estimated and discounted to their net present values at an appropriate risk-adjusted rate of return. Significant factors considered in the calculation of the rate of return are the weighted average cost of capital and return on assets, as well as the risks inherent in the development process, including the likelihood of achieving technological success and market acceptance. Each project was analyzed to determine the unique technological innovations, the existence and reliance on core technology, the existence of any alternative future use or current technological feasibility, and the complexity, cost and time to complete the remaining development. Future cash flows for each project were estimated based on forecasted revenue and costs, taking into account the expected product life cycles, market penetration and growth rates.
 
The prior years’ IPR&D charges included only the fair value of IPR&D determined as of the respective acquisition dates. The fair value of developed technology is included in identifiable purchased intangible assets and is amortized over the estimated useful life of the technology. We believe the amounts recorded as IPR&D, as well as developed technology, represented the fair values and approximate the amounts an independent party would pay for these projects as of the respective acquisition dates.
 
The following table summarizes the significant assumptions underlying the valuations of IPR&D at the acquisition dates for the acquisitions completed in 2009, 2008 and 2007:
 
                                             
        Weighted
                         
        Average
    Average
          Risk
       
        Estimated
    Estimated
    Estimated
    Adjusted
       
        Percent
    Time to
    Cost to
    Discount
       
Company Acquired
  Development Projects   Complete     Complete     Complete     Rate     IPR&D  
              (In years)     (In millions)           (In millions)  
 
2009 Acquisitions
                                           
Dune Networks
  High-density switching line card solutions     85 %     1.0     $ 1.9       21 %   $ 50.4  
2008 Acquisitions
                                           
Sunext
  Blu-ray application     49       1.0       4.3       20       10.9  
DTV Business of AMD
  Xilleon product line     82       1.0       6.9       24       31.5  
2007 Acquisitions
                                           
LVL7
  Enhancements to FASTPATH application platform     31       1.0       7.8       21       0.3  
Octalica
  High performance communication controller     52       1.0       6.8       29       10.2  
Global Locate
  Single-chip GPS device     62       1.5       5.6       20       5.0  
 
As of the respective acquisition dates, certain ongoing development projects were in process. The assumptions consist primarily of expected completion dates for the IPR&D projects, estimated costs to complete the projects, and revenue and expense projections for the products once they have entered the market. Research and development costs to bring the products of the acquired companies to technological feasibility are not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition. At December 31, 2009 certain development projects from our Dune Networks acquisition were still in process. We completed all other development projects related to our prior acquisitions. Actual results to date have been consistent, in all material respects, with our assumptions at the time of the acquisitions.
 
Supplemental Pro Forma Data (Unaudited)
 
The unaudited pro forma statement of operations data below gives effect to the Sunext Design, DTV Business of AMD, and Dune Networks acquisitions that were completed in 2008 and 2009 as if they had occurred at the beginning of 2008. The following data includes the amortization of purchased intangible assets and stock-based compensation expense, but excludes the charge for acquired in-process research and development. In addition, it includes an impairment of goodwill and purchased intangibles of $432.0 million recorded by AMD in 2008 prior to our acquisition of the DTV Business. This pro forma data is presented for informational purposes only and does not purport to be indicative of the results of future operations or of the results that would have occurred had the acquisitions taken place at the beginning of 2008.
 
                 
    Year Ended
 
    December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands, except per share data)  
 
Pro forma net revenue
  $ 4,520,525     $ 4,748,888  
                 
Pro forma net income (loss)
  $ 44,503     $ (314,664 )
                 
Pro forma net income (loss) per share (basic)
  $ 0.09     $ (0.61 )
                 
Pro forma net income (loss) per share (diluted)
  $ 0.09     $ (0.61 )
                 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
 
4.   Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
 
At December 31, 2009 we had $2.368 billion in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. We maintain an investment portfolio of various security holdings, types and maturities. The fair value of substantially all of our cash equivalents and marketable securities is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The fair value of commercial paper included in cash equivalents was determined based on “Level 2” inputs, which were derived based on quoted prices for identical or similar assets, which had few transactions near the measurement period. We place our cash investments in instruments that meet credit quality standards, as specified in our investment policy guidelines. These guidelines also limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issue, issuer or type of instrument. All of our marketable securities are rated AA, Aa2, A-1 or P-1 or above by the major credit rating agencies.
 
A summary of our cash, cash equivalents and short- and long-term marketable securities by major security type follows:
 
                                 
          Short-Term
    Long-Term
       
    Cash and
    Marketable
    Marketable
       
    Cash Equivalents     Securities     Securities     Total  
          (In thousands)        
 
December 31, 2009
                               
Cash
  $ 74,044     $     $     $ 74,044  
Time deposits
    571,959                   571,959  
U.S. Treasury and agency money market funds
    515,930                   515,930  
U.S. Treasury and agency obligations
          521,022       436,518       957,540  
Commercial paper and corporate bonds(1)
    79,988       11,259       2,098       93,345  
Institutional money market funds
    155,172                   155,172  
                                 
    $ 1,397,093     $ 532,281     $ 438,616     $ 2,367,990  
                                 
December 31, 2008
                               
Cash
  $ 88,366     $     $     $ 88,366  
Time deposits
    273,654                   273,654  
U.S. Treasury and agency money market funds
    828,586                   828,586  
U.S. Treasury and agency obligations
          703,722             703,722  
Commercial paper and corporate bonds
          3,755             3,755  
Institutional money market funds
    39                   39  
                                 
    $ 1,190,645     $ 707,477     $     $ 1,898,122  
                                 
 
 
(1) The fair value of the $80.0 million of commercial paper included in cash equivalents was determined based on “Level 2” inputs, which were derived based on quoted prices for identical or similar assets, which had few transactions near the measurement period.
 
The following table shows the gross unrealized gains and losses and fair values for those investments as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 aggregated by major security type:
 
                                 
          Gross
    Gross
       
          Unrealized
    Unrealized
       
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
          (In thousands)        
 
December 31, 2009
                               
U.S. Treasury and agency obligations
  $ 956,944     $ 724     $ (128 )   $ 957,540  
Commercial paper and corporate bonds
    93,352       5       (12 )     93,345  
                                 
    $ 1,050,296     $ 729     $ (140 )   $ 1,050,885  
                                 
December 31, 2008
                               
U.S. Treasury and agency obligations
  $ 698,910     $ 4,814     $ (2 )   $ 703,722  
Commercial paper and corporate bonds
    3,354       401             3,755  
                                 
    $ 702,264     $ 5,215     $ (2 )   $ 707,477  
                                 
 
All of our long-term marketable securities had maturities of between one and two years in duration at December 31, 2009.
 
As of December 31, 2009 we had 26 investments that were in an unrealized loss position of $0.1 million. The gross unrealized losses related to these investments were due to changes in interest rates. We have determined that the gross unrealized losses on these investments at December 31, 2009 are temporary in nature. We review our investments to identify and evaluate investments that have an indication of possible other-than-temporary impairment. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is other-than-temporary include the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than the cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. We do not use derivative financial instruments. We place our cash investments in instruments that meet high credit quality standards, as specified in our investment policy guidelines. These guidelines also limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issue, issuer or type of instrument.
 
Strategic Investments
 
At December 31, 2009 the carrying values of our strategic investments in equity securities of privately held companies totaled $2.0 million. In 2009 there were no changes in the carrying value of our strategic investments. In 2008 we recorded net losses on strategic investments of $4.3 million. In 2007 we recorded a net gain on strategic investments of $1.8 million. These gains and losses were included in other income (expense), net, in the consolidated statements of income.
Income Taxes
Income Taxes
 
5.   Income Taxes
 
For financial reporting purposes, income (loss) before income taxes includes the following components:
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
          (In thousands)        
 
United States
  $ (365,563 )   $ (424,374 )   $ (146,945 )
Foreign
    437,754       646,689       366,401  
                         
    $ 72,191     $ 222,315     $ 219,456  
                         
 
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes at the federal statutory rate compared to our provision for income taxes follows:
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
    (In thousands)  
 
Statutory federal provision for income taxes
  $ 25,266     $ 77,810     $ 76,809  
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
                       
In-process research and development
          3,815       5,415  
Impairment of goodwill
          20,779        
State taxes, net of federal benefit
    (163 )     394       (1,108 )
Refundable research and development credit
    (3,037 )     (3,000 )      
Benefit of tax credits
    (79,984 )     (42,087 )     (70,104 )
Valuation allowance changes
    193,096       (504,723 )     60,778  
Increase in deferred tax assets resulting from changes in tax law
    (6,654 )            
Reversal of taxes previously accrued (including penalties and interest)
    (7,649 )     (6,498 )     (6,000 )
Tax rate differential on foreign earnings
    (155,351 )     (145,779 )     (112,633 )
Stock-based compensation expense
    56,493       91,253       52,251  
Foreign dividend distribution
          491,240        
Other
    (15,087 )     24,317       706  
                         
Provision for income taxes
  $ 6,930     $ 7,521     $ 6,114  
                         
 
The income tax provision consists of the following components:
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
    (In thousands)  
 
Current:
                       
Federal
  $ (1,607 )   $ (2,966 )   $  
State
    (250 )     606       (1,704 )
Foreign
    14,202       11,649       7,935  
                         
      12,345       9,289       6,231  
                         
Deferred:
                       
Federal
                 
State
                 
Foreign
    (5,415 )     (1,768 )     (117 )
                         
      (5,415 )     (1,768 )     (117 )
                         
    $ 6,930     $ 7,521     $ 6,114  
                         
 
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of our deferred taxes were as follows:
 
                 
    December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
Deferred tax assets:
               
Research and development tax credit carryforwards
  $ 615,242     $ 533,800  
Foreign tax credit carryforwards
    53,667       46,155  
Capitalized research and development costs
    145,563       203,027  
Net operating loss carryforwards
    333,909       212,874  
Reserves and accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes
    116,818       46,684  
Stock-based compensation and purchased intangible assets
    120,633       164,582  
Other
    66,293       42,983  
                 
Gross deferred tax assets
    1,452,125       1,250,105  
Valuation allowance
    (1,434,029 )     (1,242,610 )
                 
Deferred tax assets, net
    18,096       7,495  
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
Purchased intangible assets
    (29,287 )      
                 
Net deferred tax assets
  $ (11,191 )   $ 7,495  
                 
 
Broadcom operates under tax holidays in Singapore, which are effective through March 2014. The tax holidays are conditional upon our meeting certain employment and investment thresholds. The impact of the Singapore tax holidays decreased Singapore taxes by $224.8 million, $284.0 million and $239.3 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The benefit of the tax holidays on net income per share (diluted) was $0.44, $0.54 and $0.41 for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
 
During the three months ended December 31, 2008 we made a strategic decision to make a special one-time repatriation of prior earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries in the form of a $1.5 billion dividend. Approximately $0.1 billion of this dividend represented previously taxed income that was not subject to federal tax upon distribution. We utilized approximately $491.3 million of previously reserved domestic deferred tax assets (including net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards) to offset the federal taxes on the remaining $1.4 billion of dividend income, resulting in no federal income tax expense relating to the repatriation. The repatriation resulted in additional state taxes of $0.8 million for 2008.
 
We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. We record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial performance. Forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not required is difficult when there is negative evidence such as cumulative losses in recent years. As a result of our recent cumulative losses in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions, and the full utilization of our loss carryback opportunities, we have concluded that a full valuation allowance should be recorded in such jurisdictions. In certain other foreign jurisdictions where we do not have cumulative losses, we had net deferred tax liabilities of $11.2 million at December 31, 2009 and net deferred tax assets of $7.5 million at December 31, 2008.
 
In 2009 our judgment changed with respect to prior period uncertain tax positions, which resulted in additional unrecognized tax benefits in the amount of approximately $380.0 million, of which approximately $280.0 million would be credited to paid-in capital if ultimately sustained and utilized to reduce our income tax liabilities because it relates to excess deductions from employee stock options. The remaining portion of these tax benefits, approximately $100.0 million, was previously offset by a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets. If these tax positions are not sustained, there will be no net effect on our tax provision because of the related valuation allowance.
 
Our deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008 do not include $284.0 million and $630.8 million, respectively, of excess tax benefits from employee stock option exercises that are a component of our research and development credits, capitalized research and development, and net operating loss carryovers. Shareholders’ equity will be increased by $284.0 million if and when such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized.
 
If and when recognized, the tax benefits relating to any reversal of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009 will be accounted for as follows: approximately $1.423 billion will be recognized as a reduction of income tax expense and $10.6 million will be recorded as an increase in equity. In 2009 we recorded a $24.0 million increase in foreign deferred tax liabilities relating to acquisitions.
 
At December 31, 2009 for our income tax filings we had federal, state, United Kingdom and Israel net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $2.038 billion, $2.010 billion, $63.7 million and $21.4 million, respectively. A valuation allowance has been provided on virtually all of these loss carryforwards. If unutilized, the federal net operating loss carryforwards will expire between 2019 and 2029. If unutilized, the state net operating loss carryforwards will expire between 2010 and 2029. The United Kingdom and Israel net operating losses have no expiration date. At December 31, 2009 we had Canadian scientific research and experimental development expenditures of $28.4 million available for tax deduction in future tax years. These future tax deductions can be carried forward indefinitely. At December 31, 2009, we also had $13.0 million of Israeli research and development expenditures which are deductible over the next two tax years.
 
At December 31, 2009 for our income tax filings we had foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $53.7 million, and federal, state and Canadian research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $402.2 million, $436.0 million, and $13.7 million, respectively. A valuation allowance has been provided on virtually all of these credit carryforwards. These foreign tax credit carryforwards expire between 2013 and 2019, and these research and development credit carryforwards expire between 2017 and 2029, if not previously utilized. Certain state research and development credit carryforwards have no expiration date.
 
At December 31, 2009, deferred taxes have not been provided on the excess of book basis over tax basis in the amount of approximately $240.8 million in the shares of certain foreign subsidiaries because their bases differences are not expected to reverse in the foreseeable future and are considered permanent in duration. These bases differences arose primarily through the undistributed book earnings of these foreign subsidiaries that we intend to reinvest indefinitely. The bases differences could reverse through a sale of the subsidiaries, the receipt of dividends from the subsidiaries, or various other events. We believe that U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes would be substantially offset upon reversal of this excess book basis due to the current existence of domestic net operating loss and credit carryforwards.
 
Our income tax returns for the 2004, 2005 and 2006 tax years and our employment tax returns for the 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 tax years are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service. We do not expect that the results of these examinations will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
 
In 2007 we recognized a decrease of $3.9 million in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, and recognized a $4.7 million reduction in accumulated deficit. In addition we reclassified certain tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, as well as related potential penalties and interest, from current liabilities to long-term liabilities.
 
The following table summarizes the activity related to these unrecognized tax benefits:
 
         
    Total  
    (In thousands)  
 
Balance at January 1, 2009
  $ 21,176  
Increases related to current year tax positions
    6,355  
Expiration of the statutes of limitation for the assessment of taxes
    (4,027 )
Increases related to prior year tax positions as a result of changes in tax law and judgment
    376,925  
Other
    353  
         
Balance at December 31, 2009
  $ 400,782  
         
 
The unrecognized tax benefits of $400.8 million at December 31, 2009 included $117.1 million of tax benefits that, if recognized, would reduce our annual effective tax rate. We reversed penalties and interest of $3.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, during 2009, resulting from the expiration of statutes of limitation. We also accrued potential penalties and interest of $1.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, related to these unrecognized tax benefits during 2009, and in total, as of December 31, 2009, we recorded a liability for potential penalties and interest of $11.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively. We recognize potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the consolidated statements of income as income tax expense. We had a $376.9 million increase in unrecognized tax benefits relating to reductions to our federal and state net operating loss carryforwards, capitalized research and development costs, and tax credit carryforwards for previous years. These reductions primarily resulted from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit May 27, 2009 ruling in the case between Xilinx, Inc. and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue discussed below. Other than the possible reversal of the increases in unrecognized tax benefits relating to the decision in the Xilinx case, we do not expect our unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next twelve months.
 
We file federal, state, and foreign income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitation. The 2004 through 2009 tax years generally remain subject to examination by federal and most state tax authorities. In significant foreign jurisdictions, the 2001 through 2009 tax years generally remain subject to examination by their respective tax authorities.
 
In October, 2008 the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 was enacted. A provision in this legislation provided for the extension of the research and development tax credit for qualifying expenditures paid or incurred from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2009. As a result of this new legislation, we generated federal research and development tax credits for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 which if unutilized, carry over to future periods. No benefit was recorded for these carryovers since we have a full valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2009. Pursuant to a provision contained in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009, which was enacted in February, 2009, and a provision contained in The Housing Assistance Act of 2008, which was enacted in July, 2008, we recognized federal tax benefits of approximately $3.0 million in both 2009 and 2008, which resulted from the utilization of a portion of our federal credits for increasing research activities (research and development tax credits). In 2009, we recorded a tax provision of $3.2 million associated with the exposure resulting from a recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the case involving Xilinx, Inc. as discussed below.
 
On May 27, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the case between Xilinx, Inc. and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, overturned a 2005 U.S. Tax Court ruling regarding treatment of certain compensation expenses under a Company’s research and development cost-sharing arrangements with affiliates. The Court of Appeals held that related parties to such an arrangement must share stock-based compensation expenses, notwithstanding the fact that unrelated parties in such an arrangement would not share such costs. The case is subject to further appeal. The potential impact to Broadcom, should the IRS prevail, of including such stock-based compensation expenses in our research and development cost-sharing arrangements would be additional income for federal and state purposes from January 1, 2001 forward, and may result in additional related federal and state income and franchise taxes. We adjusted our federal and state net operating loss carryforwards, our federal and state capitalized research and development costs and our deferred tax positions. and recorded a $3.2 million tax provision for additional federal and state income and franchise taxes to reflect this decision. We reduced our federal and state net operating loss carryforwards by approximately $600.0 million and $380.0 million, respectively, and reduced our deferred tax assets for both federal and state capitalized research and development costs by approximately $10.0 million each. Additionally, in 2009 we reduced our deferred tax asset relating to stock-based compensation expenses by approximately $60.0 million, and increased our deferred tax asset for certain tax credits by approximately $10.0 million, with each of these amounts offset by a corresponding adjustment to our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets resulting in no net change to deferred tax assets.
 
As a result of the expensing of share-based payments since January 1, 2006, our deferred tax assets exclude certain excess tax benefits from employee stock-based compensation that are components of our research and development credits, capitalized research and development, and net operating loss carryovers. If and when these tax benefits are realized, a credit is recorded to equity. The federal and state net operating losses and the capitalized research and development costs we reduced as a result of the decision in the Xilinx case represent such excess tax benefits from employee stock-based compensation and therefore do not result in an adjustment to our deferred tax assets.
 
On January 13, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit withdrew its May 27, 2009 ruling in the Xilinx case and will reconsider the matter at a future date to be determined. In accounting for income tax uncertainties, only information that is available at December 31, 2009 can be considered in measuring our tax position. Accordingly, the accounting impact of the withdrawal of the Xilinx ruling will be reflected in our consolidated financial statements for the period ending March 31, 2010. If there are no further developments during the period ending March 31, 2010, we anticipate that we will record a tax benefit of $3.2 million and reestablish the deferred tax assets that were adjusted during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and thereafter to reflect the impact of the Xilinx decision as of December 31, 2009. These adjustments included reductions of federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $665.0 million and $455.0 million, respectively, as well as reductions in federal and state capitalized research and development costs of approximately $10.0 million each. We also reduced our deferred tax asset relating to stock-based compensation by approximately $65.0 million and increased our deferred tax asset for certain tax credits by approximately $10.0 million. All of these amounts will be fully offset by a corresponding adjustment to the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets resulting in no net change to deferred tax assets in our consolidated balance sheet and no adjustment to the related income tax expense.
Commitments and Other Contractual Obligations
Commitments and Other Contractual Obligations
 
6.   Commitments and Other Contractual Obligations
 
Commitments
 
We lease facilities in Irvine (our corporate headquarters) and Santa Clara County, California. Each of these facilities includes administration, sales and marketing, research and development and operations functions. In addition to our principal design facilities in Irvine and Santa Clara County, we lease design facilities throughout the United States. Internationally, we lease a distribution center that includes engineering design and administrative facilities in Singapore as well as engineering design and administrative facilities in several other countries.
 
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2009:
 
                                                         
    Obligations by Year  
    2010     2011     2012     2013     2014     Thereafter     Total  
    (In thousands)  
 
Operating leases
  $ 111,142     $ 79,540     $ 55,562     $ 39,307     $ 38,300     $ 107,709     $ 431,560  
Inventory and related purchase obligations
    477,700                                     477,700  
Other purchase obligations
    80,908       5,427       1,550                         87,885  
Estimated settlement costs
    176,707                                     176,707  
Unrecognized tax benefits
    400,782                                     400,782  
                                                         
Total
  $ 1,247,239     $ 84,967     $ 57,112     $ 39,307     $ 38,300     $ 107,709     $ 1,574,634  
                                                         
 
Facilities rent expense in 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $69.6 million, $68.0 million and $65.2 million, respectively.
 
Inventory and related purchase obligations represent purchase commitments for silicon wafers and assembly and test services. We depend upon third party subcontractors to manufacture our silicon wafers and provide assembly and test services. Due to lengthy subcontractor lead times, we must order these materials and services from subcontractors well in advance. We expect to receive and pay for these materials and services within the ensuing six months. Our subcontractor relationships typically allow for the cancellation of outstanding purchase orders, but require payment of all expenses incurred through the date of cancellation.
 
Other purchase obligations represent purchase commitments for lab test equipment, computer hardware, information systems infrastructure, mask and prototyping costs, and other purchase commitments made in the ordinary course of business.
 
Estimated settlement costs represent costs that we expect to pay within the next year. See Note 10.
 
For purposes of the table above, obligations for the purchase of goods or services are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Our purchase orders are based on current manufacturing needs and are typically fulfilled by our vendors within a relatively short time horizon. We have additional purchase orders (not included in the table above) that represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements. We do not have significant agreements for the purchase of inventories or other goods specifying minimum quantities or set prices that exceed our expected requirements.
 
In addition to the unrecognized tax benefits included in the table above, we have also recorded a liability for potential penalties and interest of $11.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009.
 
Other Contractual Obligations
 
We have obligations to indemnify certain of our present and former directors, officers and employees to the maximum extent not prohibited by law. Under these obligations, Broadcom is required (subject to certain exceptions) to indemnify each such director, officer and employee against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlements, paid by such individual. The potential amount of the future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification obligations could be significant. We maintain directors’ and officers’ insurance policies that may generally limit our exposure and enable us to recover a portion of the amounts paid with respect to such obligations. We recognize reimbursements from our directors’ and officers’ insurance carriers on a cash basis, pursuant to which we record a reduction of selling, general and administrative expense only when cash is received from our insurance carriers.
 
In August 2009 Broadcom, by and through its special litigation committee, plaintiffs and certain of the defendants executed a Stipulation and Agreement of Partial Settlement, or Partial Derivative Settlement, in the federal derivative action pertaining to past employee stock option grants. The Partial Derivative Settlement resolves all claims in the action against the defendants, other than three individuals: Dr. Henry T. Nicholas, III, our former President and Chief Executive Officer and former Co-Chairman of the Board, William J. Ruehle, our former Chief Financial Officer, and Dr. Henry Samueli, our Chief Technical Officer. In connection with the Partial Derivative Settlement, Broadcom and certain of the defendants also entered into a settlement with Broadcom’s directors and officers liability insurance carriers, or Insurance Agreement. On September 30, 2009 the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order preliminarily approving the Partial Derivative Settlement. On December 14, 2009, the District Court entered an order granting final approval of the Partial Derivative Settlement. On January 6, January 8 and January 11, 2010, Dr. Nicholas, Mr. Ruehle, and Dr. Samueli, respectively, filed notices of appeal of the order, also in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
 
Pursuant to the Insurance Agreement, and subject to the terms described more completely therein, including relinquishing of rights to any further recovery as to the matters described above under these directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies by Broadcom and certain of its former and current officers and directors, Broadcom received payments totaling $118.0 million from its insurance carriers. That amount includes $43.3 million in reimbursements previously received from the insurance carriers under reservations of rights, and $74.7 million paid to Broadcom upon final approval of the Partial Derivative Settlement. Broadcom paid $11.5 million to the lead federal derivative plaintiffs’ counsel for attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs of plaintiffs’ counsel in connection with the Partial Derivative Settlement and their prosecution of the derivative action. Therefore, we have recovered legal expenses of $91.3 million, $16.7 million and $10.0 million, in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, recorded as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expense under these insurance policies.
 
In the event that the trial court’s approval of the Partial Derivative Settlement is reversed or vacated by an appellate court or otherwise does not become final and non-appealable, Broadcom in its sole discretion has the election to either provide a release to the insurance carriers and indemnify them related to any future claims and retain the $118.0 million in accordance with the Insurance Agreement or repay to the insurance carriers certain portions of the aggregate amount previously paid to Broadcom. In the event the Partial Derivative Settlement is reversed or vacated, it would be our intention to exercise our option to retain the $118.0 million and indemnify the insurance carriers.
 
In connection with our securities litigation and related government investigations, we have advanced $136.9 million to certain former officers for attorney and expert fees as of December 31, 2009, which amount has been expensed.
 
For further discussion of litigation matters, see Note 11.
Shareholders Equity
Shareholders' Equity
 
7.   Shareholders’ Equity
 
Common Stock
 
At December 31, 2009 we had 2,500,000,000 authorized shares of Class A common stock and 400,000,000 authorized shares of Class B common stock. The shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock are substantially identical, except that holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held, and holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes for each share held, on all matters submitted to a vote of the shareholders. In addition, holders of Class B common stock are entitled to vote separately on the proposed issuance of additional shares of Class B common stock in certain circumstances. The shares of Class B common stock are not publicly traded. Each share of Class B common stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into one share of Class A common stock and in most instances automatically converts upon sale or other transfer. The Class A common stock and Class B common stock are sometimes collectively referred to herein as “common stock.” In 2009, 2008 and 2007, 5.9 million shares, 6.1 million shares and 6.4 million shares, respectively, of Class B common stock were automatically converted into a like number of shares of Class A common stock upon sale or other transfer pursuant to the terms of our Articles of Incorporation. In June 2006 we clarified that we are only authorized to issue 6,432,161 shares of convertible preferred stock and eliminated all statements referring to the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D and Series E preferred stock, all outstanding shares of which automatically converted into shares of Class B common stock upon consummation of our initial public offering.
 
Share Repurchase Programs
 
From time to time our Board of Directors has authorized various programs to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock depending on market conditions and other factors. Under such programs, we repurchased a total of 15.0 million, 65.2 million and 35.8 million shares of Class A common stock at weighted average prices of $28.12, $19.44 and $32.31 per share, in the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
 
In July 2008 the Board of Directors authorized our current program to repurchase shares of Broadcom’s Class A common stock having an aggregate value of up to $1.0 billion. Repurchases under the program may be made from time to time during the period that commenced July 31, 2008 and continuing through and including July 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2009, $154.0 million remained authorized for repurchase under this program.
 
Repurchases under our share repurchase programs were and will be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions in compliance with Rule 10b-18 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
 
Registration Statements
 
We have filed a universal shelf registration statement on SEC Form S-3 and an acquisition shelf registration statement on the SEC Form S-4. The universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 permits Broadcom to sell, in one or more public offerings, shares of our Class A common stock, shares of preferred stock or debt securities, or any combination of such securities, for proceeds in an aggregate amount of up to $1.5 billion. The acquisition shelf registration statement on Form S-4 enables us to issue up to 30 million shares of our Class A common stock in one or more acquisition transactions. These transactions may include the acquisition of assets, businesses or securities by any form of business combination. To date no securities have been issued pursuant to either registration statement.
Employee Benefit Plans
Employee Benefit Plans
 
8.   Employee Benefit Plans
 
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
 
We have an employee stock purchase plan, or ESPP, for all eligible employees. Under the ESPP, employees may purchase shares of our Class A common stock at six-month intervals at 85% of fair market value (calculated in the manner provided in the plan). Employees purchase such stock using payroll deductions, which may not exceed 15% of their total cash compensation. Shares of Class A common stock are offered under the ESPP through a series of successive offering periods, generally with a maximum duration of 24 months, subject to an additional 3-month extension under certain circumstances. The plan imposes certain limitations upon an employee’s right to acquire Class A common stock, including the following: (i) no employee may purchase more than 9,000 shares of Class A common stock on any one purchase date, (ii) no employee may be granted rights to purchase more than $25,000 worth of Class A common stock for each calendar year that such rights are at any time outstanding, and (iii) the maximum number of shares of Class A common stock purchasable in total by all participants in the ESPP on any purchase date is limited to 4.0 million shares. The number of shares of Class A common stock reserved for issuance under the plan automatically increases in January each year. The increase is equal to a percentage of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on the last trading day of the immediately preceding year, subject to an annual share limit.
 
In March 2007 the Board of Directors approved an amendment and restatement of the ESPP, as previously amended and restated, to increase the limitation on the amount by which the share reserve of the plan is to automatically increase each year to not more than 10 million shares of Class A common stock. This amendment and restatement was approved by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held in May 2007.
 
In March 2008 the Board of Directors approved an amendment and restatement of the ESPP, as previously amended and restated, to (i) extend the term of the plan through April 30, 2018, (ii) increase the number of shares of Class A common stock that will be automatically added to the share reserve on the first trading day of January in each calendar year from 1.00% to 1.25% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar year, and (iii) effect various technical revisions. This amendment and restatement was approved by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held in June 2008.
 
In 2009, 2008 and 2007, 5.9 million, 4.4 million and 2.0 million shares, respectively, were issued under this plan at average per share prices of $14.59, $17.84 and $27.07, respectively. At December 31, 2009, 11.1 million shares were available for future issuance under this plan.
 
Stock Incentive Plans
 
We have in effect stock incentive plans under which incentive stock options have been granted to employees and restricted stock units and non-qualified stock options have been granted to employees and non-employee members of the Board of Directors. Our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, or 1998 Plan, is the successor equity incentive program to our 1994 Stock Option Plan, or 1994 Plan and our 1998 Special Stock Option Plan, together, the Predecessor Plans. The number of shares of Class A common stock reserved for issuance under the 1998 Plan automatically increases in January each year. The increase is equal to 4.5% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on the last trading day of the immediately preceding year, subject to an annual share limit.
 
In March 2007, the Board of Directors approved an amendment and restatement of the 1998 Plan to increase the limitation on the amount by which the share reserve of the 1998 Plan is to automatically increase each year to not more than 45 million shares of Class A common stock. This amendment and restatement was approved by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held in May 2007.
 
In February 2008 the Board of Directors approved an amendment and restatement of the 1998 Plan, as previously amended and restated, to (i) revise the Director Automatic Grant Program in effect for non-employee directors under the plan, (ii) extend the term of the plan through March 12, 2018, (iii) revise the adjustments that may be made to certain performance criteria that may serve as the vesting conditions for performance-based awards made under the plan, and (iv) effect various technical revisions to facilitate plan administration. This amendment and restatement was approved by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held in June 2008.
 
The Board of Directors or the Plan Administrator determines eligibility, vesting schedules and exercise prices for options granted under the plans. Options granted generally have a term of 10 years, and in the case of new hires generally vest and become exercisable at the rate of 25% after one year and ratably on a monthly basis over a period of 36 months thereafter; subsequent option grants to existing employees generally vest and become exercisable ratably on a monthly basis over a period of 48 months measured from the date of grant. However, certain options that have been granted under our 1998 Plan or that were assumed by us in connection with certain of our acquisitions provide that the vesting of the options granted thereunder will accelerate in whole or in part upon the occurrence of certain specified events.
 
In addition, we grant restricted stock units as part of our regular annual employee equity compensation review program as well as to new hires and non-employee members of the Board of Directors. Restricted stock units are share awards that entitle the holder to receive freely tradable shares of our Class A common stock upon vesting. Generally, restricted stock units vest ratably on a quarterly basis over 16 quarters from the date of grant. On a limited basis, we grant certain restricted stock units that vest in their entirety after three years.
 
In connection with certain acquisitions, we have assumed stock options granted under stock option plans or agreements established by the acquired company. As of December 31, 2009, 1.0 million shares of Class A common stock were reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding options assumed under these stock option plans.
 
Combined Incentive Plan Activity
 
Activity under all stock option incentive plans in 2009, 2008 and 2007 is set forth below:
 
                                 
    Options Outstanding  
                Weighted
    Weighted
 
                Average
    Average
 
          Exercise
    Exercise
    Grant-Date
 
    Number of
    Price Range
    Price
    Fair Value
 
    Shares     per Share     per Share     per Share  
    (In thousands)                    
 
Balance at December 31, 2006
    125,885     $ .01 -   $81.50     $ 22.35     $ 17.65  
Options granted under the 1998 Plan
    21,882       27.96 -    37.30       32.82       10.72  
Options cancelled
    (3,607 )     1.47 -    48.63       30.20       10.91  
Options exercised
    (18,018 )     .01 -    41.15       16.88       14.08  
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2007
    126,142       .01 -    81.50       24.96       15.81  
Options granted under the 1998 Plan
    7,229       14.90 -    28.75       25.81       10.19  
Options cancelled
    (4,423 )     .01 -    78.92       30.45       11.43  
Options exercised
    (6,678 )     .01 -    28.30       13.80       15.29  
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2008
    122,270       .01 -    81.50       25.42       15.66  
Options granted under the 1998 Plan
    2,733       17.83 -    29.07       23.26       10.91  
Options cancelled
    (3,643 )     .01 -    48.63       31.12       15.71  
Options exercised
    (7,954 )     0.1 -    31.08       17.93       13.23  
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2009
    113,406     $ .01 -    81.50     $ 25.71     $ 15.71  
                                 
 
At December 31, 2009 outstanding options to purchase 99.2 million shares were exercisable with an average per share exercise price of $25.08. The weighted average remaining contractual lives of options outstanding and of options exercisable as of December 31, 2009 were 5.2 years and 4.8 years, respectively.
 
The total pretax intrinsic value of options exercised in 2009 was $75.9 million. This intrinsic value represents the difference between the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price of each option. Based on the closing price of our Class A common stock of $31.47 on December 31, 2009, the total pretax intrinsic value of all outstanding options was $812.0 million. The total pretax intrinsic value of exercisable options at December 31, 2009 was $769.8 million.
 
Restricted stock unit activity in 2009, 2008 and 2007 is set forth below:
 
                 
    Restricted Stock Units
 
    Outstanding  
          Weighted
 
          Average
 
          Grant-Date
 
    Number of
    Fair Value
 
    Shares     per Share  
    (In thousands)        
 
Balance at December 31, 2006
    12,700     $ 33.39  
Restricted stock units granted
    12,232       32.84  
Restricted stock units cancelled
    (1,172 )     33.05  
Restricted stock units vested
    (6,707 )     32.19  
                 
Balance at December 31, 2007
    17,053       33.50  
Restricted stock units granted
    20,537       24.39  
Restricted stock units cancelled
    (1,446 )     30.56  
Restricted stock units vested
    (8,522 )     30.93  
                 
Balance at December 31, 2008
    27,622       27.61  
Restricted stock units granted
    13,738       24.06  
Restricted stock units cancelled
    (1,442 )     24.51  
Restricted stock units vested
    (11,225 )     28.84  
                 
Balance at December 31, 2009
    28,693     $ 25.58  
                 
 
The total pretax intrinsic value of restricted stock units that vested in 2009 was $275.3 million. Based on the closing price of our Class A common stock of $31.47 on December 31, 2009, the total pretax intrinsic value of all outstanding restricted stock units was $903.0 million.
 
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
 
The following table presents details of total stock-based compensation expense that is included in each functional line item on our consolidated statements of income:
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
    (In thousands)  
 
Cost of product revenue
  $ 24,545     $ 24,997     $ 26,470  
Research and development
    351,884       358,018       353,649  
Selling, general and administrative
    119,918       126,359       139,533  
                         
    $ 496,347     $ 509,374     $ 519,652  
                         
 
The amount of unearned stock-based compensation currently estimated to be expensed from 2010 through 2013 related to unvested share-based payment awards at December 31, 2009 is $823.3 million. The following table presents details of unearned stock-based compensation currently estimated to be expensed in 2010 through 2013 related to unvested share-based payment awards at December 31, 2009:
 
                                                 
    2010   2011   2012   2013   Thereafter   Total
    (In thousands)
 
Unearned stock-based compensation
  $ 395,410     $ 263,197     $ 132,126     $ 32,593     $     $ 823,326  
 
The weighted-average period over which the unearned stock-based compensation is expected to be recognized is 1.3 years. If there are any modifications or cancellations of the underlying unvested awards, we may be required to accelerate, increase or cancel any remaining unearned stock-based compensation expense. Future stock-based compensation expense and unearned stock-based compensation will increase to the extent that we grant additional equity awards or assume unvested equity awards in connection with acquisitions.
 
The per share fair values of stock options granted in connection with stock incentive plans and rights granted in connection with the employee stock purchase plan have been estimated with the following weighted average assumptions:
 
                                                 
    Employee Stock Options     Employee Stock Purchase Rights  
    2009     2008     2007     2009     2008     2007  
 
Expected life (in years)
    4.98       4.23       3.20       0.92       1.78       1.33  
Implied volatility
    0.53       0.45       0.39       0.53       0.53       0.40  
Risk-free interest rate
    1.83 %     2.88 %     4.54 %     0.46 %     1.96 %     4.98 %
Expected dividend yield
    0.00 %     0.00 %     0.00 %     0.00 %     0.00 %     0.00 %
Weighted average fair value
  $ 10.91     $ 10.19     $ 10.72     $ 7.39     $ 8.91     $ 10.95  
 
The weighted average fair values per share of the restricted stock units awarded in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $24.06, $24.39 and $32.84, respectively, calculated based on the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the respective grant dates.
 
Shares Reserved For Future Issuance
 
We had the following shares of common stock reserved for future issuance upon the exercise or issuance of equity instruments as of December 31, 2009:
 
         
    Number of Shares  
    (In thousands)  
 
Stock options outstanding
    113,406  
Authorized for future grants under stock incentive plans
    76,003  
Authorized for future issuance under stock purchase plan
    11,087  
Restricted stock units outstanding
    28,693  
         
      229,189  
         
 
401(k) Savings and Investment Plan
 
We sponsor a defined contribution 401(k) savings and investment plan, established in 1996, covering substantially all of our U.S. employees, subject to certain eligibility requirements. At our discretion, we may make contributions to this plan. In 2006 we adopted a limited matching contribution policy. Under this policy, we made $6.7 million, $6.1 million and $6.1 million in contributions to participants in this plan in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets
Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets
 
9.   Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets
 
We performed annual impairment assessments of the carrying value of goodwill in October 2009, 2008 and 2007. We compared the carrying value of each of our reporting units that existed at those times to its estimated fair value.
 
We estimated the fair values of our reporting units primarily using the income approach valuation methodology that includes the discounted cash flow method, taking into consideration the market approach and certain market multiples as a validation of the values derived using the discounted cash flow methodology. The discounted cash flows for each reporting unit were based on discrete financial forecasts developed by management for planning purposes. Cash flows beyond the discrete forecasts were estimated using a terminal value calculation, which incorporated historical and forecasted financial trends for each identified reporting unit and considered long-term earnings growth rates for publicly traded peer companies. Future cash flows were discounted to present value by incorporating appropriate present value techniques.
 
Specifically, the income approach valuations included the following assumptions:
 
         
    Valuation Assumptions
    2009   2008
 
Discount Rate
  12.0% - 17.5%   15.0% - 17.0%
Perpetual Growth Rate
  4.0%   4.0% - 5.0%
Tax
  17.0%   10.0%
Risk Free Rate
  4.0%   4.3%
Peer Company Beta
  1.24 - 1.69   1.83 - 2.50
 
Based on our 2009 impairment assessment at December 31, 2009, we believe we have no at-risk goodwill. At December 31, 2009 our Broadband Communications, Enterprise Networking, Wireless Connectivity and Mobile Platforms reporting units had the following goodwill balances, $483.0 million, $587.5 million and $259.1 million and none, respectively. At December 31, 2008 our Broadband Communications, Enterprise Networking, Wireless Connectivity and Mobile Platforms reporting units had the following goodwill balances, $483.8 million, $536.4 million and $259.1 million and none, respectively.
 
Upon completion of the October 2009 and 2007 annual impairment assessments, we determined no impairment was indicated as the estimated fair value of each of the reporting units exceeded its respective carrying value. Upon completion of the October 2008 assessment, we determined that the carrying value of our Mobile Platforms reporting unit exceeded its estimated fair value. Because indicators of impairment existed for this business group, we performed the second step of the test to determine the fair value of the goodwill of our Mobile Platforms reporting unit.
 
The implied fair value of goodwill was determined in the same manner utilized to estimate the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. As part of the second step of the impairment test performed in 2008, we calculated the fair value of certain assets, including developed technology, IPR&D assets and customer relationships. To determine the implied value of goodwill, fair values were allocated to the assets and liabilities of the Mobile Platforms reporting unit as of October 1, 2008. The implied fair value of goodwill was measured as the difference between of the fair value of the Mobile Platforms reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities. The impairment loss for the Mobile Platforms reporting unit was measured by the amount the carrying value of goodwill exceeded the implied fair value of the goodwill. Based on this assessment, we recorded a charge of $149.7 million in the three months ended December 31, 2008, which represented all of the related goodwill of our Mobile Platforms reporting unit.
 
We also reviewed other long-lived tangible assets for impairment. An impairment in the carrying value of an asset group is recognized whenever anticipated future undiscounted cash flows from an asset group are estimated to be less than its carrying value. The amount of impairment recognized is the difference between the carrying value of the assets and their fair values. Fair value estimates are based on assumptions concerning the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows and assumed discount rates, reflecting varying degrees of perceived risk. We utilized appraisals to assess the reasonableness of the fair values estimated using the discounted cash flow methodology. Based on this evaluation we recorded an impairment charge of $19.8 million related to the property and equipment of our Mobile Platforms reporting unit in the three months ended December 31, 2008.
 
The primary factors contributing to the Mobile Platforms reporting unit impairment charges were the recent significant economic downturn, which caused a decline in the cellular market, as well as tempered expectations of the future growth rate for that market, and an increase in our implied discount rate due to higher risk premiums, as well as the decline in our market capitalization. We adjusted our assumptions used to calculate the estimated fair value of the Mobile Platforms reporting unit to account for these macroeconomic changes.
 
In addition, we recorded impairment charges to customer relationships, developed technology and certain other assets of $18.9 million in 2009 related to the acquisition of the DTV Business of AMD. The primary factor contributing to these impairment charges was the continued reduction in our revenue outlook for this business.
Settlement Costs, Net
Settlement Costs, Net
 
10.   Settlement Costs, Net
 
In 2009 we incurred settlement costs of $183.8 million partially offset by settlement gains of $65.3 million, resulting in $118.5 million of net settlement costs.
 
In December 2009 we agreed in principle to the settlement of the securities class action litigation pending against Broadcom and certain of its current and former officers and directors. Under the proposed settlement, the claims will be dismissed with prejudice and released in exchange for a $160.5 million cash payment by Broadcom. We recorded the settlement amount as a one-time charge in our statement of income for the three months and year ended December 31, 2009 as our best estimate of our liability based upon current facts and circumstances. The proposed settlement remains subject to the satisfaction of various conditions, including negotiation and execution of a final stipulation of settlement and court approval. If these conditions are satisfied, the proposed settlement will resolve all claims in the settlement of the securities class action litigation against Broadcom and the individual defendants.
 
We recorded settlement gains of $65.3 million related to the Qualcomm Agreement in 2009. For a further discussion of this agreement, see Note 2. In addition, we recorded settlement costs of $12.1 million related to a payment to the Israeli government associated with a post-acquisition technology transfer fee related to our acquisition of Dune Networks. We also recorded $11.2 million in settlement costs in 2009 for estimated settlements associated with certain employment tax items, other employment matters and a patent infringement claim.
 
In April 2008 we entered into a settlement with the SEC relating to the previously-disclosed SEC investigation of Broadcom’s historical stock option granting practices. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, we agreed to pay a civil penalty of $12.0 million, which we recorded as a settlement cost in 2008. The settlement was approved by the United States District Court for the Central District of California in late April 2008. In addition, we settled a patent infringement claim for $3.8 million in 2008.
 
For further discussion of income tax and litigation matters, see Notes 5 and 11, respectively.
Litigation
Litigation
 
11.   Litigation
 
Intellectual Property Proceedings.  In April 2009 we entered into the Qualcomm Agreement that resulted in the parties dismissing with prejudice all outstanding litigation between them, and Broadcom withdrawing its complaints with foreign competition authorities. For further discussion of the Qualcomm Agreement, see Notes 2 and 10.
 
In December 2006 SiRF Technology, Inc., or SiRF, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Global Locate, Inc., a privately-held company that became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Broadcom in July 2007, alleging that certain Global Locate products infringe four SiRF patents relating generally to GPS technology. In January 2007 Global Locate filed an answer denying the allegations in SiRF’s complaint and asserting counterclaims. The counterclaims seek a declaratory judgment that the four SiRF patents are invalid and not infringed, assert that SiRF has infringed four Global Locate patents relating generally to GPS technology, and assert unfair competition and antitrust violations related to the filing of sham litigation. In May 2007 the court granted Global Locate’s motion to stay the case until the U.S. International Trade Commission, or ITC, actions between Global Locate and SiRF, discussed below, become final.
 
In February 2007 SiRF filed a complaint in the ITC alleging that Global Locate engaged in unfair trade practices by importing integrated circuits and other products that infringe, both directly and indirectly, four SiRF patents relating generally to GPS technology. The complaint seeks an exclusion order to bar importation of those Global Locate products into the United States and a cease and desist order to bar further sales of infringing Global Locate products that have already been imported. In March 2007 the ITC instituted an investigation of Global Locate based upon the allegations made in the SiRF complaint. SiRF withdrew two patents from the investigation, and an ITC administrative law judge conducted a hearing on SiRF’s remaining two patents in suit in March 2008. In June 2008 the ITC administrative law judge issued an initial determination finding SiRF’s two patents not infringed and one patent invalid. In August 2008 the ITC denied SiRF’s petition to review the administrative law judge’s initial determination finding no violation, thereby adopting the administrative law judge’s initial determination as the final determination of the ITC and terminating the investigation. In October 2008 SiRF filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit. In March 2009, SiRF filed a request to withdraw its appeal which was subsequently granted by the United States Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit.
 
In April 2007 Global Locate filed a complaint in the ITC against SiRF and four of its customers, e-TEN Corporation, Pharos Science & Applications, Inc., MiTAC International Corporation and Mio Technology Limited, referred to collectively as the SiRF Defendants, asserting that the SiRF Defendants engaged in unfair trade practices by importing GPS devices, including integrated circuits and embedded software, incorporated in products such as personal navigation devices and GPS-enabled cellular telephones that infringe, both directly and indirectly, six Global Locate patents relating generally to GPS technology. The complaint seeks an exclusion order to bar importation of the SiRF Defendants’ products into the United States and a cease and desist order to bar further sales of infringing products that have already been imported. In May 2007 the ITC instituted an investigation of the SiRF Defendants based upon the allegations made in the Global Locate complaint. A hearing was held in April and May 2008. In August 2008 the administrative law judge issued an initial determination finding that SiRF and the other SiRF Defendants infringed each of Global Locate’s six patents, and that each of the six patents was not invalid and issued a recommended determination on remedy and bonding. In October 2008 the ITC determined, in part, not to review the administrative law judge’s initial determination finding violation of three of Global Locate’s patents. The ITC also decided to review the administrative law judge’s initial determination that three other Global Locate patents were infringed by SiRF.
 
In January 2009 the Commission issued a Final Determination and upheld the ITC administrative law judge’s August 2008 initial determination finding that SiRF and the other SiRF respondants infringe six Global Locate patents and that each of the six patents was not invalid. The Commission also issued an exclusion order banning the importation into the United States of infringing SiRF chips and the SiRF Defendants’ products containing infringing SiRF chips and a cease and desist order prohibiting SiRF and the certain other SiRF Defendants from engaging in certain activities related to the infringing chips. In March 2009, the SiRF Defendants filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit conducted a hearing in November 2009 and a decision is expected in 2010.
 
In May 2008 Broadcom filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against SiRF, alleging that certain SiRF GPS and multimedia products infringe four Broadcom patents relating generally to graphics and communications technology. The District Court complaint seeks preliminary and permanent injunctions against SiRF and the recovery of monetary damages, including treble damages for willful infringement, and attorneys’ fees. In June 2008 SiRF answered the complaint and asserted counterclaims seeking a declaratory judgment that Broadcom’s patents are invalid and not infringed. In September 2008 the court denied SiRF’s motion to stay the case. Discovery is ongoing. In October 2009, Broadcom amended its complaint to add CSR plc as a defendant and assert claims alleging false advertisement and unfair competition. In October 2009 SiRF answered the amended complaint denying liability and asserting counterclaims alleging false advertising and unfair competition. In December 2009 we answered SiRF’s counterclaims denying liability. In December 2009, the judge granted the parties joint stipulation of dismissal with prejudice for all claims relating to one of the Broadcom patents; three Broadcom patents remain in the lawsuit. Trial has been set for November 2010.
 
In October 2007 Wi-LAN Inc. filed complaints against us and multiple other defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that certain Broadcom products infringe three Wi-LAN patents relating generally to wireless LAN and DSL technology. The complaint seeks a permanent injunction against us as well as the recovery of monetary damages and attorneys’ fees. We filed an answer in January 2008 denying the allegations in Wi-LAN’s complaint and asserting counterclaims seeking a declaratory judgment that the three Wi-LAN patents are invalid, unenforceable and not infringed. In February 2009 Wi-LAN filed a supplemental complaint alleging that certain Broadcom products infringe a fourth Wi-LAN patent relating generally to Bluetooth technology. The complaint seeks a permanent injunction against us as well as the recovery of monetary damages and attorneys’ fees. We filed an answer in February 2009 denying the allegations in Wi-LAN’s complaint and asserting counterclaims seeking a declaratory judgment that the fourth Wi-LAN patent is invalid, unenforceable and not infringed. Discovery is ongoing. Trial has been set for January 2011.
 
In December 2008 we filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Wi-LAN seeking declaratory judgment that Broadcom’s products do not infringe the fourth Wi-LAN patent referred to in the previous paragraph and that the patent is invalid and unenforceable. In October 2009, that case was transferred to the Eastern District of Texas.
 
In September 2009 we filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Emulex Corporation, or Emulex, alleging infringement of ten patents generally relating to networking technologies. The complaint seeks preliminary and permanent injunctions against Emulex and the recovery of monetary damages, including treble damages for willful infringement, and attorneys’ fees. Emulex answered the complaint in November 2009, denying liability and asserting counterclaims seeking a declaratory judgment that the ten patents are invalid and not infringed as further discussed below. Discovery is currently underway, with trial set for September 2011.
 
In November 2009 we filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) seeking a declaratory judgment that U.S. Patent Number 5,487,069 is invalid, unenforceable and not infringed. CSIRO has not yet answered the complaint. No trial date has been set.
 
Securities Litigation and Other Related Matters.  In November 2009 Emulex filed a complaint in the Central District of California against Broadcom alleging violation of the antitrust laws, defamation, and unfair competition. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees. In January 2010, Emulex filed an amended complaint, to which we have not yet responded. No trial date has been set. We intend to defend this action vigorously.
 
From March through August 2006 a number of purported Broadcom shareholders filed putative shareholder derivative actions, the Options Derivative Actions, against Broadcom, each of the then members of our Board of Directors and certain current or former officers, alleging, among other things, that the defendants improperly dated certain Broadcom employee stock option grants. Four of those cases, Murphy v. McGregor, et al. (Case No. CV06-3252 R (CWx)), Shei v. McGregor, et al. (Case No. SACV06-663 R (CWx)), Ronconi v. Dull, et al. (Case No. SACV 06-771 R (CWx)) and Jin v. Broadcom Corporation, et al. (Case No. 06CV00573) have been consolidated in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint in November 2006. In addition, two putative shareholder derivative actions, Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Med. Benefits Trust v. Samueli, et al. (Case No. 06CC0124) and Servais v. Samueli, et al. (Case No. 06CC0142), were filed in the California Superior Court for the County of Orange. The Superior Court consolidated the state court derivative actions in August 2006, and the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint in September 2006. The plaintiffs in the Options Derivative Actions contend, among other things, that the defendants’ conduct violated United States and California securities laws, breached defendants’ fiduciary duties, wasted corporate assets, unjustly enriched the defendants, and caused errors in our consolidated financial statements. The plaintiffs seek, among other things, unspecified damages and disgorgement of profits from the alleged conduct, to be paid to Broadcom.
 
In January 2007 the California Superior Court granted defendants’ motion to stay the state derivative action pending resolution of the prior-filed federal derivative action. In March 2007 the court in the federal derivative action denied our motion to dismiss, which motion was based on the ground that the shareholder plaintiffs lack standing to assert claims on behalf of Broadcom. Motions to dismiss filed by the individual defendants were heard, and mostly denied, in May 2007. Additionally, in May 2007 the Board of Directors established a special litigation committee, or SLC, to decide what course of action Broadcom should pursue in respect of the claims asserted in the Options Derivative Actions.
 
In August 2009 Broadcom, by and through its SLC, plaintiffs and certain of the defendants executed a Stipulation and Agreement of Partial Settlement, or Partial Derivative Settlement, in the federal derivative action pertaining to past employee stock option grants. The Partial Derivative Settlement resolves all claims in the action against the defendants, other than three individuals: Dr. Henry T. Nicholas, III, our former President and Chief Executive Officer and former Co-Chairman of the Board, William J. Ruehle, our former Chief Financial Officer, and Dr. Henry Samueli, our Chief Technical Officer. In connection with the Partial Derivative Settlement, Broadcom and certain of the defendants also entered into a settlement with Broadcom’s directors and officers liability insurance carriers, or Insurance Agreement. On September 30, 2009 the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order preliminarily approving the Partial Derivative Settlement. On December 14, 2009, the District Court entered an order granting final approval of the Partial Derivative Settlement. On January 6, January 8 and January 11, 2010, Dr. Nicholas, Mr. Ruehle, and Dr. Samueli filed notices of appeal of the order in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
 
From August through October 2006 several plaintiffs filed purported shareholder class actions in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Broadcom and certain of our current or former officers and directors, entitled Bakshi v. Samueli, et al. (Case No. 06-5036 R (CWx)), Mills v. Samueli, et al. (Case No. SACV 06-9674 DOC R(CWx)), and Minnesota Bakers Union Pension Fund, et al. v. Broadcom Corp., et al. (Case No. SACV 06-970 CJC R (CWx)), the Stock Option Class Actions. The essence of the plaintiffs’ allegations is that we improperly backdated stock options, resulting in false or misleading disclosures concerning, among other things, our business and financial condition. Plaintiffs also allege that we failed to account for and pay taxes on stock options properly, that the individual defendants sold our common stock while in possession of material nonpublic information, and that the defendants’ conduct caused artificial inflation in our stock price and damages to the putative plaintiff class. The plaintiffs assert claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. In November 2006 the Court consolidated the Stock Option Class Actions and appointed the New Mexico State Investment Council as lead class plaintiff. In October 2007 the federal appeals court resolved a dispute regarding the appointment of lead class counsel. In March 2008 the district judge entered a revised order appointing lead class counsel. The lead plaintiff filed an amended consolidated class action complaint in late April 2008, naming additional defendants including certain current officers and directors of Broadcom as well as Ernst & Young LLP, our former independent registered public accounting firm, or E&Y. In October 2008 the district judge granted defendants’ motions to dismiss with leave to amend. In October 2008 the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint. In November 2008 defendants filed motions to dismiss. In February 2009 these motions were denied except with respect to E&Y and the former Chairman of the Audit Committee, which were granted with leave to amend, and with respect to the former Chief Executive Officer, which was granted without leave to amend. The lead plaintiff did not amend its complaint with respect to the former Chairman of the Audit Committee and the time period to do so has expired. With respect to E&Y, in March 2009 the district judge entered a final judgment for E&Y and against the lead plaintiff. The lead plaintiff has appealed the final judgment.
 
In December 2009 we agreed in principle to settle the Stock Option Class Actions. Under the proposed settlement, the claims against Broadcom and its current and former officers and directors will be dismissed with prejudice and released in exchange for a $160.5 million cash payment by Broadcom. We recorded the settlement amount as a one-time charge in our consolidated statement of income for the three months and year ended December 31, 2009. The proposed settlement remains subject to the satisfaction of various conditions, including negotiation and execution of a final stipulation of settlement and court approval. If these conditions are satisfied , the proposed settlement will resolve all claims in the Stock Option Class Actions against Broadcom and the individual defendants. In the event that we are unable to execute a final stipulation of settlement and obtain court approval, our ultimate liability could differ materially.
 
In April 2008 we delivered a Notice of Arbitration and Arbitration Claim to our former independent registered public accounting firm, E&Y, and certain related parties. The arbitration relates to the issues that led to the restatement of Broadcom’s financial statements for the periods from 1998 through March 31, 2006 as disclosed in an amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 and an amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March 31, 2006, each filed with the SEC January 23, 2007. In May 2008 E&Y delivered a Notice of Defense and Counterclaim. No date for an arbitration hearing has been scheduled.
 
We have indemnification agreements with each of our present and former directors and officers, under which we are generally required to indemnify each such director or officer against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlements, arising from the Options Derivative Actions, the Stock Option Class Actions and the pending SEC and U.S. Attorney’s Office investigations described below (subject to certain exceptions, including liabilities arising from willful misconduct, from conduct knowingly contrary to the best interests of Broadcom, or conduct that is knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest or results in improper personal benefit). The potential amount of the future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification obligations could be significant and could have a material impact on our results of operations. Pursuant to the Insurance Agreement, and subject to the terms described more completely therein, including relinquishing of rights to any further recovery as to the matters described above under these directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies by Broadcom and certain of its former and current officers and directors, Broadcom received payments totaling $118.0 million from its insurance carriers. That amount includes $43.3 million in reimbursements previously received from the insurance carriers under reservations of rights, and $74.7 million paid to Broadcom upon final approval of the Partial Derivative Settlement. In addition, Broadcom paid $11.5 million to the lead federal derivative plaintiffs’ counsel for attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs of plaintiffs’ counsel in connection with the Partial Derivative Settlement and their prosecution of the derivative action.
 
In the event that the trial court’s approval of the Partial Derivative Settlement is reversed or vacated by an appellate court or otherwise does not become final and non-appealable, Broadcom in its sole discretion has the election to either provide a release to the insurance carriers and indemnify them related to any future claims and retain the $118.0 million in accordance with the Insurance Agreement or to repay to the insurance carriers certain portions of the aggregate amount previously paid to Broadcom.
 
In November 2008 Randy Lee Soderstrom, alleged to have been employed by a former contractor of Broadcom and presently a prisoner in a California state prison, filed a complaint entitled Soderstrom v. Henry T. Nicholas III, William J. Ruehle, Henry Samueli, David Dull, Broadcom Corporation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Case No. CV 08 5310 PVT). In his complaint, Soderstrom sought relief under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The complaint made allegations relative to conduct similar to that which is alleged in the Options Derivative Actions and Option Class Actions discussed above, and the SEC and United States Attorney’s Office investigations discussed below, but also contained certain different allegations. The plaintiff is representing himself in this action. On May 20, 2009, the Court granted Broadcom’s motion to dismiss and also granted the motions to dismiss of all other defendants. A final judgment on behalf of defendants was entered the same day. The plaintiff filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment on June 22, 2009, which was denied on June 25, 2009. The plaintiff appealed, but on September 15, 2009 the lower court’s decision was summarily affirmed by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The plaintiff subsequently asked the entire Ninth Circuit to hear his case; this request was denied on November 13, 2009. On December 8, 2009, the plaintiff petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. His request is pending. Broadcom intends to continue to defend this action vigorously.
 
SEC Formal Order of Investigation and United States Attorney’s Office Investigation.  In April 2008 the SEC brought a complaint against Broadcom alleging violations of the federal securities laws, and we entered into a settlement with the SEC. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, we paid a civil penalty of $12.0 million, which we recorded as a settlement cost in the three months ended March 31, 2008, and stipulated to an injunction against future violations of certain provisions of the federal securities laws. The settlement was approved by the United States District Court for the Central District of California in late April 2008, thus concluding the SEC’s investigation of this matter with respect to Broadcom.
 
In May 2008 the SEC filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. SACV08-539 CJC (RNBx)) against Dr. Samueli and three other former executive officers of Broadcom, relating to its previously-disclosed investigation of the company’s historical stock option granting practices. The SEC’s civil complaint alleges that Dr. Samueli, along with the other defendants, violated the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, falsified books and records, and caused the company to report false financial results. The SEC’s complaint seeks to: (i) enjoin the defendants from future violations of the securities laws; (ii) require two of the defendants to disgorge any ill-gotten gains and pay prejudgment interest; (iii) require all defendants to pay civil monetary penalties; (iv) require two defendants to disgorge bonuses and stock sales profits pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; (v) bar all defendants from serving as officers or directors of a public company; and (vi) provide other appropriate relief. On December 15, 2009, in connection with the criminal matters discussed below, the District Court dismissed the SEC’s complaint without prejudice as to all defendants. The SEC was given 30 days to refile or amend its complaint if it chose to do so, and had not done so within the required time period. Instead, the SEC filed a request for clarification of the District Court’s order, which was heard on January 28, 2010. Following that hearing, the District Court gave the SEC seven days to refile or amend its complaint. We cannot predict whether the SEC will attempt to refile or amend its complaint against some or all of the defendants. After the SEC complaint was dismissed, Dr. Samueli was re-elected Chief Technical Officer. He is not currently a director or executive officer.
 
In August 2006 we were informally contacted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California and asked to produce documents related to our historical option granting practices. We cooperated with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and provided substantial amounts of documents and information to the U.S. Attorney’s Office on a voluntary basis and pursuant to grand jury subpoenas. In June 2008 Dr. Nicholas and Mr. Ruehle were named in an indictment relating to alleged stock option backdating at the company. Also, in June 2008 Dr. Samueli pled guilty to making a materially false statement to the SEC in connection with its investigation of alleged stock options backdating at the company. In September 2008 the United States District Court for the Central District of California rejected Dr. Samueli’s plea agreement. Dr. Samueli appealed the ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, but that court rejected his appeal. On December 7, 2009, the District Court granted Dr. Samueli use immunity so that he could testify in Mr. Ruehle’s trial. On December 8, 2009, at the conclusion of Dr. Samueli’s testimony, the District Court set aside Dr. Samueli’s guilty plea and dismissed the information against him. Mr. Ruehle’s trial began in October 2009 and concluded December 15, 2009. After both sides rested, the District Court dismissed the indictment against Mr. Ruehle on the grounds of prosecutorial misconduct and insufficient evidence of criminal intent. The District Court simultaneously dismissed the option charges against Dr. Nicholas, which were scheduled to be tried in February 2010. The U.S. Attorney’s office has filed notices of appeal as to both Dr. Nicholas and Dr. Samueli, but has also represented to the District Court that no final decision has yet been reached as to whether those appeals will be pursued. Any further action by the SEC, the U.S. Attorney’s Office or another governmental agency could result in additional civil or criminal sanctions and/or fines against us and/or certain of our current or former officers, directors and/or employees.
 
United States Attorney’s Office Investigation and Prosecution.  In June 2005 the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California commenced an investigation into the possible misuse of proprietary competitor information by certain Broadcom employees. In December 2005 one former employee was indicted for fraud and related activity in connection with computers and trade secret misappropriation. The former employee had been immediately suspended in June 2005, after just two months’ employment, when we learned about the government investigation. Following an internal investigation, his employment was terminated, nearly two months prior to the indictment. The indictment does not allege any wrongdoing by us, and we are cooperating fully with the ongoing investigation and the prosecution.
 
General.  We and our subsidiaries are also involved in other legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business.
 
The pending proceedings involve complex questions of fact and law and will require the expenditure of significant funds and the diversion of other resources to prosecute and defend. The results of legal proceedings are inherently uncertain, and material adverse outcomes are possible. The resolution of intellectual property litigation may require us to pay damages for past infringement or to obtain a license under the other party’s intellectual property rights that could require one-time license fees or ongoing royalties, which could adversely impact our product gross margins in future periods, or could prevent us from manufacturing or selling some of our products or limit or restrict the type of work that employees involved in such litigation may perform for us. From time to time we may enter into confidential discussions regarding the potential settlement of pending litigation or other proceedings; however, there can be no assurance that any such discussions will occur or will result in a settlement. The settlement of any pending litigation or other proceeding could require us to incur substantial settlement payments and costs. In addition, the settlement of any intellectual property proceeding may require us to grant a license to certain of our intellectual property rights to the other party under a cross-license agreement. If any of those events were to occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Business Enterprise Segments, Significant Customer, Supplier and Geographical Information
Business Enterprise Segments, Significant Customer, Supplier and Geographical Information
 
12.   Business Enterprise Segments, Significant Customer, Supplier and Geographical Information
 
Business Enterprise Segments
 
Broadcom has three reportable segments consistent with our target markets. Our three reportable segments are as follows:
 
  •  Solutions for the Home (Broadband Communications) — enabling such products as digital cable, satellite and Internet Protocol (IP) set-top boxes and media servers; cable and digital subscriber line (DSL) modems and residential gateways; high definition televisions (HDTVs); high definition Blu-ray Disc players; and digital video recorders (DVRs).
  •  Solutions for the Hand (Mobile & Wireless)— integrating solutions in applications for wireless and personal area networking; cellular communications; personal navigation and global positioning; processing multimedia content in smartphones; and for managing the power in mobile devices. This reportable segment comprises our Mobile Platforms and Wireless Connectivity businesses; and
  •  Solutions for Network Infrastructure (Enterprise Networking)— incorporating solutions for the business network requirements of enterprise, data center, small-to-medium-sized businesses (SMBs), and carriers and service providers, featuring high-speed controllers, switches and physical layer (PHY) devices supporting transmission and switching for local, metropolitan, wide area and storage networking.
 
Historically, we reported one segment. In 2009 several factors contributed to our decision to report in three segments. First, entering into the Qualcomm Agreement resulted in significant licensing income and triggered the need to display licensing revenue separately in our consolidated statements of income. Second, the narrative we use to communicate our strategic focus to investors and help them understand our business evolved to our present framework of Home (Broadband Communications), Hand (Mobile & Wireless) and Infrastructure (Enterprise Networking). Accordingly, we believe that a segment presentation consistent with this would represent better disclosure and increase transparency. Third, and consistent with this approach, in our annual reexamination of the economics of our businesses, we found that the financial metrics for our Enterprise Networking business were diverging from those of our other businesses, and that our Broadband Communications business was becoming dissimilar from our Mobile & Wireless business. Accordingly, we now report three segments: Broadband Communication, Mobile & Wireless and Enterprise Networking.
 
Our Chief Executive Officer, who is our chief operating decision maker, or CODM, reviews financial information at the operating segment level. Our Mobile Platforms and Wireless Connectivity businesses (originally operated as a single operating segment) are reported separately to the CODM to allow greater management focus on our Mobile Platform opportunity. However as the customers, economics, and competitors substantially overlap, and the product functionality is being integrated across these products in our own and competitor roadmaps, we aggregate these two businesses into one reportable segment, Mobile & Wireless.
 
We also report an “All Other” category that includes licensing revenue from our agreement with Verizon Wireless and income from the Qualcomm Agreement since they are principally the result of corporate efforts. “All Other” also includes operating expenses that we do not allocate to our other operating segments as these expenses are not included in the segment operating performance measures evaluated by our CODM. Operating costs and expenses that are not allocated include stock-based compensation, amortization of purchased intangible assets, impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets, net settlement costs, net restructuring costs, in-process research and development, charitable contributions, employer payroll tax on certain stock option exercises, and other miscellaneous expenses related to corporate allocations that were either over or under the original projections at the beginning of the year. We include stock-based compensation and acquisition-related items in the “All Other” category as decisions regarding equity compensation are made at the corporate level and our CODM believes that acquisition accounting distorts the underlying economics of the reportable segment. Our CODM does not review any information regarding total assets on an operating segment basis. The accounting policies for segment reporting are the same as for Broadcom as a whole.
 
We have presented 2008 and 2007 financial information on a comparative basis to conform with the current year three reportable segment presentation.
 
The following table presents details of our reportable segments and the “All Other” category:
 
                                         
    Reportable Segments        
    Broadband
  Mobile &
  Enterprise
  All
   
    Communications   Wireless   Networking   Other   Consolidated
    (In thousands)
 
Year ended December 31, 2009
                                       
Net revenue
  $ 1,525,193     $ 1,719,998     $ 1,055,553     $ 189,579     $ 4,490,323  
Operating income (loss)
    172,702       116,882       286,303       (519,815 )     56,072  
Year ended December 31, 2008
                                       
Net revenue
  $ 1,722,671     $ 1,528,178     $ 1,258,044     $ 149,232     $ 4,658,125  
Operating income (loss)
    381,421       33,974       390,293       (633,558 )     172,130  
Year ended December 31, 2007
                                       
Net revenue
  $ 1,412,293     $ 1,192,634     $ 1,139,668     $ 31,800     $ 3,776,395  
Operating income (loss)
    312,672       4,955       267,946       (500,598 )     84,975  
 
                         
Included in the “All Other” category:   Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
    (In thousands)  
 
Net revenue
  $ 189,579     $ 149,232     $ 31,800  
                         
Stock-based compensation
  $ 496,347     $ 509,374     $ 519,652  
Amortization of purchased intangibles
    30,744       19,249       14,512  
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
    18,895       171,593       1,500  
Settlement costs, net
    118,468       15,810        
Restructuring costs (reversal)
    7,501       (1,000 )      
In-process research and development
          42,400       15,470  
Charitable contribution
    50,000              
Employer payroll tax on certain stock option exercises
    4,866       3,966       10,895  
Miscellaneous corporate allocation variances
    (17,427 )     21,398       (29,631 )
                         
Total other operating costs and expenses
  $ 709,394     $ 782,790     $ 532,398  
                         
Total operating loss for the “All Other” category
  $ (519,815 )   $ (633,558 )   $ (500,598 )
                         
 
Significant Customer, Supplier and Geographical Information
 
Sales to our significant customers, including sales to their manufacturing subcontractors, as a percentage of net revenue were as follows:
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,
    2009   2008   2007
 
Samsung
    10.3 %     *       *  
Motorola
    *       *       11.2 %
Five largest customers as a group
    34.6       35.8 %     39.7  
 
 
* Less than 10% of net revenue.
 
No other customer represented more than 10% of our annual net revenue in these years.
 
Product revenue derived from all independent customers located outside the United States, excluding foreign subsidiaries or manufacturing subcontractors of customers that are headquartered in the United States even though such subsidiaries or manufacturing subcontractors are located outside of the United States, as a percentage of product revenue was as follows:
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
 
Asia (primarily in Korea, China, Japan and Taiwan)
    37.8 %     30.6 %     26.8 %
Europe (primarily in the United Kingdom, Finland and France)
    12.7       10.9       8.6  
Other
    2.1       0.3       0.5  
                         
      52.6 %     41.8 %     35.9 %
                         
 
Product revenue derived from shipments to international destinations, as a percentage of product revenue was as follows:
 
                         
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
 
Asia (primarily in China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Japan)
    90.7 %     86.7 %     82.1 %
Europe (primarily in Hungary, France, Germany and Sweden)
    2.7       2.8       2.9  
Other
    1.4       2.3       3.3  
                         
      94.8 %     91.8 %     88.3 %
                         
 
We do not own or operate a fabrication facility. Five independent third-party foundries located in Asia manufacture substantially all of our semiconductor devices in current production. Any sudden demand for an increased amount of semiconductor devices or sudden reduction or elimination of any existing source or sources of semiconductor devices could result in a material delay in the shipment of our products. In addition, substantially all of our products are assembled and tested by one of eight independent third-party subcontractors in Asia. We do not have long-term agreements with any of these suppliers. Any problems associated with the fabrication facilities or the delivery, quality or cost of our products could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
We have an international distribution center that includes engineering design and administrative facilities in Singapore as well as engineering design facilities in Belgium, Canada, China, Denmark, France, Greece, India, Israel, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. At December 31, 2009, $70.6 million of our long-lived assets (excluding goodwill and purchased intangible assets) were located outside the United States.
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
 
13.   Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
 
The following table presents our unaudited quarterly financial data. In our opinion, this information has been prepared on a basis consistent with that of our audited consolidated financial statements and all necessary material adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments, have been included to present fairly the unaudited quarterly financial data. Our quarterly results of operations for these periods are not necessarily indicative of future results of operations.
 
                         
            Diluted Net
        Net
  Income
    Total Net
  Income
  (Loss)
    Revenue   (Loss)   Per Share
    (In thousands, except per share data)
 
Year Ended December 31, 2009
                       
Fourth Quarter
  $ 1,342,746     $ 59,204 (1)   $ 0.11  
Third Quarter
    1,254,197       84,596 (2)     0.16  
Second Quarter
    1,039,944       13,401 (3)     0.03  
First Quarter
    853,436       (91,940 )(4)     (0.19 )
Year Ended December 31, 2008
                       
Fourth Quarter
  $ 1,126,509     $ (159,215 )(5)   $ (0.32 )
Third Quarter
    1,298,475       164,906 (6)     0.31  
Second Quarter
    1,200,931       134,789 (7)     0.25  
First Quarter
    1,032,210       74,314 (8)     0.14  
 
 
(1) Includes settlement costs of $175.7 million, net recovery of legal expenses of $63.2 million and restructuring reversals of $4.8 million.
 
(2) Includes impairment of long-lived assets of $7.6 million and restructuring costs of $4.8 million.
 
(3) Includes impairment of long-lived assets of $11.3 million, restructuring costs of $0.4 million, net settlement gains of $58.4 million and a charitable contribution of $50.0 million.
 
(4) Includes settlement costs of $1.2 million and restructuring costs of $7.1 million.
 
(5) Includes impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets of $169.4 million and IPR&D of $31.5 million.
 
(6) Includes other-than-temporary impairment of marketable securities of $1.8 million and loss on strategic investment of $2.5 million.
 
(7) Includes impairment of intangible assets of $1.9 million, restructuring reversal of $1.0 million and a loss on strategic investment of $1.8 million.
 
(8) Includes IPR&D of $10.9 million and settlement costs of $15.8 million.
Subsequent Events
Subsequent Events
 
14.   Subsequent Events
 
On January 27, 2010 our Board of Directors adopted a dividend policy pursuant to which we intend to pay quarterly cash dividends on our common stock and declared the first quarterly cash dividend of $0.08 per share payable to holders of our common stock. The dividend will be paid on March 8, 2010 to holders of our Class A and Class B common stock of record at the close of business on February 19, 2010. The dividend so declared will be paid from U.S. domestic sources other than our retained earnings and will be treated for accounting purposes as a reduction of shareholders’ equity.
 
On February 2, 2010 we entered into an agreement to acquire Teknovus, Inc., or Teknovus. Teknovus develops and supplies EPON (Ethernet Passive Optical Networking) access chips and embedded software. Under the terms of the agreement, Broadcom will acquire all of the outstanding equity interests (including all outstanding options and warrants) in Teknovus for aggregate consideration of approximately $123.0 million in cash, subject to adjustments for the amount of indebtedness and cash of Teknovus and certain fees and expenses of Teknovus, in each case as of the closing of the transaction. Broadcom currently expects the transaction to close in the first or second calendar quarter of 2010, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions.
Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

 
SCHEDULE II — CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
 
BROADCOM CORPORATION
 
                                         
    Balance at
    Charged (Credited)
    Charged to
          Balance at
 
    Beginning of
    to Costs and
    Other
          End of
 
Description
  Year     Expenses     Accounts(a)     Deductions     Year  
    (In thousands)  
 
Year ended December 31, 2009:
                                       
Deducted from asset accounts:
                                       
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 5,354     $ 1,561     $     $ (128 )   $ 6,787  
Sales returns
    4,273       22,773             (23,418 )     3,628  
Restructuring liabilities
    4,179       13,167             (16,018 )     1,328  
                                         
Total
  $ 13,806     $ 37,501     $     $ (39,564 )   $ 11,743  
                                         
Year ended December 31, 2008:
                                       
Deducted from asset accounts:
                                       
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 5,472     $ 143     $     $ (261 )   $ 5,354  
Sales returns
    3,245       22,327             (21,299 )     4,273  
Restructuring liabilities
    7,457       (1,000 )           (2,278 )     4,179  
                                         
Total
  $ 16,174     $ 21,470     $     $ (23,838 )   $ 13,806  
                                         
Year ended December 31, 2007:
                                       
Deducted from asset accounts:
                                       
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 6,894     $ (1,576 )   $ 386     $ (232 )   $ 5,472  
Sales returns
    3,411       12,331             (12,497 )     3,245  
Restructuring liabilities
    10,723             749       (4,015 )     7,457  
                                         
Total
  $ 21,028     $ 10,755     $ 1,135     $ (16,744 )   $ 16,174  
                                         
 
 
(a) Amounts represent balances acquired through acquisitions.