Document and Entity Information(USD $)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Feb. 24, 2012
Jun. 30, 2011
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name
Monster Beverage Corp
Entity Central Index Key
0000865752
Document Type
10-K
Document Period End Date
Dec. 31, 2011
Amendment Flag
false
Current Fiscal Year End Date
--12-31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer
Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers
No
Entity Current Reporting Status
Yes
Entity Filer Category
Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Public Float
$6,213,402,086
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding
174,309,342
Document Fiscal Year Focus
2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus
FY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2010
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents
$359,331
$354,842
Short-term investments
411,282
244,649
Trade accounts receivable, net
218,072
166,041
Distributor receivables
669
413
Inventories
155,613
153,241
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
20,912
17,022
Prepaid income taxes
370
9,992
Deferred income taxes
16,428
16,772
Total current assets
1,182,677
962,972
INVESTMENTS
23,194
44,189
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net
45,151
34,551
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
58,576
58,475
INTANGIBLES, net
48,396
43,316
OTHER ASSETS
4,405
3,447
Total Assets
1,362,399
1,146,950
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable
113,446
90,314
Accrued liabilities
31,966
23,065
Accrued promotional allowances
87,746
61,606
Deferred revenue
11,583
10,140
Accrued compensation
10,353
7,603
Income taxes payable
10,996
925
Total current liabilities
266,090
193,653
DEFERRED REVENUE
117,151
124,899
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 9)
  
  
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common stock - $0.005 par value; 240,000 shares authorized; 198,729 shares issued and 174,277 outstanding as of December 31, 2011; 197,462 shares issued and 177,960 outstanding as of December 31, 2010
9941
9881
Additional paid-in capital
229,3011
186,5461
Retained earnings
1,168,6441
882,4251
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
(1,547)1
2811
Common stock in treasury, at cost; 24,452 shares and 19,502 shares as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively
(418,234)1
(241,842)1
Total stockholders' equity
979,1581
828,3981
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
$1,362,399
$1,146,950
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical)(USD $)
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2010
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)
$0.005
$0.005
Common stock, shares authorized
240,000
240,000
Common stock, shares issued
198,729
197,462
Common stock, shares outstanding
174,277
177,960
Common stock in treasury, shares
24,452
19,502
Ratio for Numerator of Common Stock Issued for Stock Split
2
2
Ratio for Denominator of Common Stock Issued for Stock Split
1
1
Stock Dividend Rate (as a Percentage)
100.00%
100.00%
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME(USD $)
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2010
Dec. 31, 2009
NET SALES
$1,703,230
$1,303,942
$1,143,299
COST OF SALES
808,921
623,702
530,983
GROSS PROFIT
894,309
680,240
612,316
OPERATING EXPENSES
437,886
332,426
275,007
OPERATING INCOME
456,423
347,814
337,309
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest and other income, net
1,619
2,246
2,273
Loss on investments and put option, net (Note 2)
(772)
(758)
(3,887)
Total other income (expense)
847
1,488
(1,614)
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
457,270
349,302
335,695
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
171,051
137,273
126,979
NET INCOME
$286,219
$212,029
$208,716
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic (in dollars per share)
$1.621
$1.201
$1.161
Diluted (in dollars per share)
$1.531
$1.141
$1.101
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AND COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS:
Basic (in shares)
176,2121
177,0281
179,9341
Diluted (in shares)
186,6741
186,0421
189,2861
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY(USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Total
Common stock
Additional Paid-in Captial
Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Treasury stock
Balance at Dec. 31, 2008
$436,316
$969
$116,621
$461,680
$(10,825)
$(132,129)
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2008
193,702
(13,046)
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Stock-based compensation
14,303
14,303
Exercise of stock options
2,502
4
2,498
Exercise of stock options (in shares)
868
Excess tax benefits from share based payment arrangements
3,131
3,131
Repurchase of common stock
(86,173)
(86,173)
Repurchase of common stock (in shares)
(5,206)
Foreign currency translation
2,087
2,087
Change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
4,071
4,071
Net income
208,716
208,716
Balance at Dec. 31, 2009
584,953
973
136,553
670,396
(4,667)
(218,302)
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2009
194,570
(18,252)
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Stock-based compensation
16,810
16,810
Exercise of stock options
20,824
15
20,809
Exercise of stock options (in shares)
2,892
Excess tax benefits from share based payment arrangements
12,374
12,374
Repurchase of common stock
(23,540)
(23,540)
Repurchase of common stock (in shares)
(1,250)
Foreign currency translation
1,837
1,837
Change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
3,111
3,111
Net income
212,029
212,029
Balance at Dec. 31, 2010
828,3981
988
186,546
882,425
281
(241,842)
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2010
197,462
(19,502)
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Stock-based compensation
18,619
18,619
Exercise of stock options
20,318
6
20,312
Exercise of stock options (in shares)
1,181
Issuance of restricted stock (in shares)
86
Excess tax benefits from share based payment arrangements
3,824
3,824
Repurchase of common stock
(176,392)
(176,392)
Repurchase of common stock (in shares)
(4,950)
Foreign currency translation
(3,306)
(3,306)
Change in unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
1,478
1,478
Net income
286,219
286,219
Balance at Dec. 31, 2011
$979,1581
$994
$229,301
$1,168,644
$(1,547)
$(418,234)
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2011
198,729
(24,452)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME(USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2010
Dec. 31, 2009
Net income, as reported
$286,219
$212,029
$208,716
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
1,478
3,111
4,071
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(3,306)
1,837
2,087
Comprehensive income
$284,391
$216,977
$214,874
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2010
Dec. 31, 2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income
$286,219
$212,029
$208,716
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of trademark
52
48
68
Depreciation and amortization
17,032
11,728
5,839
(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment
(18)
194
(144)
Stock-based compensation
19,424
16,862
14,040
Loss (gain) on put option
727
(3,768)
Loss on investments, net
43
4,526
3,887
Deferred income taxes
(687)
(1,361)
(3,163)
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
(3,824)
(12,374)
(3,131)
Provision for doubtful accounts
52
1,659
671
Effect on cash of changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
(56,752)
(12,669)
(77,562)
Distributor receivables
(256)
4,286
86,023
Inventories
(4,465)
(44,973)
8,545
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
(6,209)
(2,774)
(2,872)
Prepaid income taxes
9,470
(9,992)
4,977
Accounts payable
26,250
33,352
(2,185)
Accrued liabilities
8,144
13,174
4,172
Accrued promotional allowances
28,442
14,702
9,712
Accrued distributor terminations
(330)
(2,570)
(99,332)
Accrued compensation
2,878
(66)
838
Income taxes payable
13,918
12,505
3,892
Deferred revenue
(6,283)
(5,474)
(6,799)
Net cash provided by operating activities
333,827
229,044
156,192
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Maturities of held-to-maturity investments
407,918
107,992
79,919
Sales of available-for-sale investments
30,545
13,201
17,254
Sales of trading investments
34,715
7,400
Purchases of held-to-maturity investments
(583,138)
(257,474)
(74,976)
Purchases of available-for-sale investments
(33,312)
(59,907)
Purchases of property and equipment
(25,552)
(12,545)
(23,554)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
519
115
877
Additions to trademarks
(5,132)
(9,852)
(5,215)
Decrease (increase) in other assets
410
(1,440)
1,226
Net cash used in investing activities
(173,027)
(212,510)
(4,469)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Principal payments on debt
(1,942)
(420)
(1,539)
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
3,824
12,374
3,131
Issuance of common stock
20,318
20,824
2,502
Purchases of common stock held in treasury
(176,392)
(23,540)
(86,173)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(154,192)
9,238
(82,079)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(2,119)
721
1,904
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
4,489
26,493
71,548
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year
354,842
328,349
256,801
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year
359,331
354,842
328,349
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest
48
13
50
Income taxes
$147,927
$136,369
$125,838
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS NON-CASH SUPPLEMENTAL DATA(USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2010
Dec. 31, 2009
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS NON-CASH SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
Capital leases for the acquisition of promotional vehicles
$2.8
$0.5
$0.8
Accounts payable for equipment purchased
$0.1
$0.2
$0.7
ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

1.                                    ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Organization – Monster Beverage Corporation, formerly named Hansen Natural Corporation, (the “Company”, “Monster”, “MBC”, “MEC”, “Hansen”, “Hansen Beverage Company” or “HBC”) was incorporated in Delaware on April 25, 1990. The Company is a holding company and has no operating business except through its consolidated subsidiaries.

 

Stock Split On January 11, 2012, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s common stock to be effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. The common stock dividend was issued on February 15, 2012. Accordingly, all per share amounts, average common stock outstanding, common stocks outstanding, common stock repurchased and equity based compensation presented in the consolidated financial statements and notes have been adjusted retroactively, where applicable, to reflect the stock split. Stockholders’ equity has been retroactively adjusted, where applicable, to give effect to the stock split for all periods presented by reclassifying the par value of the additional shares issued in connection with the stock split to Common Stock from Retained Earnings and Additional Paid-in Capital.

 

Nature of Operations – The Company develops, markets, sells and distributes “alternative” beverage category beverages primarily under the following brand names: Monster Energy®, Java Monster®, X-Presso Monster®,  Monster Energy Extra Strength Nitrous Technology®, Monster Rehab™, Peace Tea®, Hansen’s®, Hansen’s Natural Soda®, Junior Juice®, Blue Sky®, Vidration®, Worx Energy®, and Hubert’s®. The “alternative” beverage category combines non-carbonated ready-to-drink iced teas, lemonades, juice cocktails, single-serve juices and fruit beverages, ready-to-drink dairy and coffee drinks, energy drinks, sports drinks, and single-serve still water (flavored, unflavored and enhanced) with “new age” beverages, including sodas that are considered natural, sparkling juices and flavored sparkling beverages.

 

Basis of Presentation – The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.

 

Reclassifications – The Company has reclassified $0.4 million of accrued distributor terminations and $0.3 million of current portion of debt to accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 in order to conform to the current year presentation.

 

Subsequent Events – Management has reviewed and evaluated subsequent events and transactions occurring after the balance sheet date through the filing of this annual report on Form 10-K on February 29, 2012.

 

Principles of Consolidation – The Company consolidates all entities that it controls by ownership of a majority voting interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less from date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Throughout the year, the Company has had amounts on deposit at financial institutions that exceed the federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any loss as a result of these deposits and does not expect to incur any losses in the future.

 

Investments – The Company’s investments in debt securities are classified as either held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or trading, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) ASC 320. Held-to-maturity securities are those securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity. Trading securities are those securities that the Company intends to sell in the near term. All other securities not included in the held-to-maturity or trading category are classified as available-for-sale. Held-to-maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost which approximates fair market value. Trading securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses charged to earnings. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available (see Note 3). Under ASC 320-10-35, a security is considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected are less than the security’s amortized cost basis (the difference being defined as the “Credit Loss”) or if the fair value of the security is less than the security’s amortized cost basis and the investor intends, or will be required, to sell the security before recovery of the security’s amortized cost basis. If an other-than-temporary impairment exists, the charge to earnings is limited to the amount of Credit Loss if the investor does not intend to sell the security, and will not be required to sell the security, before recovery of the security’s amortized cost basis. Any remaining difference between fair value and amortized cost is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable taxes. The Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value of its investments is other-than-temporary at each quarter-end. This evaluation consists of a review by management, and includes market pricing information and maturity dates for the securities held, market and economic trends in the industry and information on the issuer’s financial condition and, if applicable, information on the guarantors’ financial condition. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the length of time and extent to which the investment’s fair value has been less than its cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and guarantors, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer and our intent and ability to retain the investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery of fair value.

 

Accounts Receivable – The Company evaluates the collectability of its trade accounts receivable based on a number of factors. In circumstances where the Company becomes aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to the Company, a specific reserve for bad debts is estimated and recorded, which reduces the recognized receivable to the estimated amount the Company believes will ultimately be collected. In addition to specific customer identification of potential bad debts, bad debt charges are recorded based on the Company’s recent loss history and an overall assessment of past due trade accounts receivable outstanding.  In accordance with ASC 210-20-45, in its consolidated balance sheets, the Company has presented accounts receivable, net of promotional allowances, only for those customers that it allows net settlement. All other accounts receivable and related promotional allowances are shown on a gross basis.

 

Adjustment – Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s December 31, 2010 consolidated financial statements, management concluded that its presentation of accounts receivable, net of certain promotional allowances in the 2010 consolidated balance sheet, should be adjusted to present such receivables and accrued expenses on a gross basis with regard to those customers for which the Company does not allow net settlement, to conform with the ASC 210-20-45; and to continue to present that portion of the allowances owed to those customers that the Company allows net settlement, to be presented on a net basis. As a result of such adjustment, accounts receivable increased by $64.8 million, accounts payable increased by $4.6 million, accrued liabilities decreased by $1.4 million and accrued promotional allowances increased by $61.6 million in the comparative 2010 consolidated balance sheet. As a result of such adjustment, there was no change in total net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. However, the following line items within net cash flows from operating activities were adjusted as follows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively; (i) accounts receivable by ($14.7) million and ($18.1) million; (ii) accounts payable by ($3.7) million and $13.6 million; (iii) accrued liabilities by $3.7 million and ($5.2) million; and (iv) accrued promotional allowances by $14.7 million and $9.7 million.

 

Inventories – Inventories are valued at the lower of first-in, first-out, cost or market value (net realizable value).

 

Property and Equipment – Property and equipment are stated at cost.  Depreciation of furniture and fixtures, office and computer equipment, computer software, equipment, and vehicles is based on their estimated useful lives (three to ten years) and is calculated using the straight-line method. Amortization of leasehold improvements is based on the lesser of their estimated useful lives or the terms of the related leases and is calculated using the straight-line method. Normal repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Expenditures that materially increase values or extend useful lives are capitalized. The related costs and accumulated depreciation of disposed assets are eliminated and any resulting gain or loss on disposition is included in net income.

 

Capitalized Software Costs – In accordance with ASC 350-40, the Company capitalizes certain costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining internal use software. Costs incurred in the preliminary project stage are expensed. All direct external costs incurred to develop internal use software during the development stage are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining useful lives. Costs such as maintenance and training are expensed as incurred.

 

Intangibles – Intangibles are primarily comprised of trademarks representing the Company’s exclusive ownership of the Monster Energy® trademark in connection with the manufacture, sale and distribution of supplements and beverages and the Hansen’s® trademark in connection with the manufacture, sale and distribution of beverages. The Company also owns a number of other trademarks in the United States as well as in a number of countries around the world.  In addition, the Company owns the Blue Sky® trademark, which was acquired in September 2000, and the Junior Juice® trademark, which was acquired in May 2001. In accordance with ASC 350, intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but instead are measured for impairment at least annually, or when events indicate that an impairment exists. The Company calculates impairment as the excess of the carrying value of its indefinite-lived assets over their estimated fair value. If the carrying value exceeds the estimate of fair value a write-down is recorded. The Company amortizes its trademarks with finite useful lives over their respective useful lives, which range from 1 to 25 years. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, there were no impairments recorded.

 

Long-Lived Assets – Management regularly reviews property and equipment and other long-lived assets, including certain definite-lived intangible assets, for possible impairment. This review occurs annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.  If there is indication of impairment, management then prepares an estimate of future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If these cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized to write down the asset to its estimated fair value. The fair value is estimated using the present value of the future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with management’s estimates of the business risks. Preparation of estimated expected future cash flows is inherently subjective and is based on management’s best estimate of assumptions concerning expected future conditions. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, there were no impairment indicators identified.

 

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions – The accounts of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated in accordance with ASC 830. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in interest and other income, net, at the time they occur. Net foreign currency exchange gains or losses resulting from the translation of assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar are recorded as a part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Unrealized foreign currency exchange gains and losses on certain intercompany transactions that are of a long-term investment nature (i.e., settlement is not planned or anticipated in the foreseeable future) are also recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity.

 

Revenue Recognition – The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Generally, ownership of and title to the Company’s products passes to customers upon delivery of the products to customers.  Certain of the Company’s distributors may also perform a separate function as a co-packer on the Company’s behalf. In such cases, ownership of and title to the Company’s products that are co-packed on the Company’s behalf by those co-packers who are also distributors, passes to such distributors when the Company is notified by them that they have taken transfer or possession of the relevant portion of the Company’s finished goods. Net sales have been determined after deduction of promotional and other allowances in accordance with ASC 605-50. Amounts received pursuant to new and/or amended distribution agreements entered into with certain distributors, relating to the costs associated with terminating the Company’s prior distributors, are accounted for as revenue ratably over the anticipated life of the respective distribution agreement, generally 20 years.

 

Management believes that adequate provision has been made for cash discounts, returns and spoilage based on the Company’s historical experience.

 

Cost of Sales – Cost of sales consists of the costs of raw materials utilized in the manufacture of products, co-packing fees, repacking fees, in-bound freight charges, as well as certain internal transfer costs, warehouse expenses incurred prior to the manufacture of the Company’s finished products and certain quality control costs. Raw materials account for the largest portion of the cost of sales.  Raw materials include cans, bottles, other containers, ingredients and packaging materials.

 

Operating Expenses – Operating expenses include selling expenses such as distribution expenses to transport products to customers and warehousing expenses after manufacture, as well as expenses for advertising, sampling and in-store demonstration costs, costs for merchandise displays, point-of-sale materials and premium items, sponsorship expenses, other marketing expenses and design expenses.  Operating expenses also include such costs as payroll costs, travel costs, professional service fees including legal fees, termination payments made to certain of the Company’s prior distributors, depreciation and other general and administrative costs.

 

Freight-Out Costs – For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, freight-out costs amounted to $60.5 million, $47.4 million and $39.8 million, respectively, and have been recorded in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

 

Advertising and Promotional Expenses – The Company accounts for advertising production costs by expensing such production costs the first time the related advertising takes place. A significant amount of the Company’s promotional expenses result from payments under endorsement and sponsorship contracts. Accounting for endorsement and sponsorship payments is based upon specific contract provisions. Generally, endorsement and sponsorship payments are expensed on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract after giving recognition to periodic performance compliance provisions of the contracts. Advertising and promotional expenses, including but not limited to production costs, amounted to $148.8 million, $104.9 million and $86.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Advertising and promotional expenses are included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

 

Income Taxes – The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in ASC 740. Under the liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using tax rates expected to be in effect during the years in which the basis differences reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the need for valuation allowances the Company considers projected future taxable income and the availability of tax planning strategies. If in the future the Company determines that it would not be able to realize its recorded deferred tax assets, an increase in the valuation allowance would be recorded, decreasing earnings in the period in which such determination is made.

 

The Company assesses its income tax positions and records tax benefits for all years subject to examination based upon the Company’s evaluation of the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date. For those tax positions where there is a greater than 50% likelihood that a tax benefit will be sustained, the Company has recorded the largest amount of tax benefit that may potentially be realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. For those income tax positions where there is less than 50% likelihood that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit has been recognized in the financial statements.

 

Stock-Based Compensation – The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the provisions of ASC 718.  The Company records compensation expense for employee stock options based on the estimated fair value of the options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula. The Company records compensation expense for non-employee stock options based on the estimated fair value of the options as of the earlier of (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the non-employee to earn the stock option is reached or (2) the date at which the non-employee’s performance is complete, using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula. Stock-based compensation cost for restricted stock awards and restricted stock units is measured based on the closing fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. In the event that the Company has the option and intent to settle a restricted stock unit in cash, the award is classified as a liability and revalued at each balance sheet date. See Note 12.

 

Net Income Per Common Share – In accordance with ASC 260, net income per common share, on a basic and diluted basis, is presented for all periods.  Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding. The calculation of common equivalent shares assumes the exercise of dilutive stock options, net of assumed treasury share repurchases at average market prices, as applicable.

 

Concentration of Risk – Certain of the Company’s products utilize components (raw materials and/or co-packing services) from a limited number of sources. A disruption in the supply of such components could significantly affect the Company’s revenues from those products, as alternative sources of such components may not be available at commercially reasonable rates or within a reasonably short time period. The Company continues to take steps on an ongoing basis to secure the availability of alternative sources for such components and minimize the risk of any disruption in production.

 

On October 2, 2010, The Coca-Cola Company (“TCCC”) completed its acquisition of the North American business operations of Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. (“CCE”), through a merger with a wholly owned subsidiary of TCCC. The surviving wholly owned subsidiary was subsequently renamed Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. (“CCR”), and currently distributes certain of the Company’s products in those portions of the United States in which CCE previously distributed certain of the Company’s products. Concurrently with this acquisition, a new entity, which retained the name Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. (“New CCE”) was formed, which currently distributes certain of our products in Great Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Monaco and Sweden (added during the first quarter of 2011).

 

CCR, a customer of the Direct Store Delivery segment (“DSD”) with sales within specific markets in the United States and Canada, accounted for approximately 29% of the Company’s net sales for the year ended December 31, 2011. CCE (including the Coca-Cola Bottling Company up to September 30, 2010) (CCE replaced by New CCE from October 1, 2010), a customer of the DSD segment with sales within specific markets in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and certain countries in Europe, accounted for approximately 28% and 27% of the Company’s net sales for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

Credit Risk – The Company sells its products nationally and internationally, primarily to full service beverage distributors, retail grocery and specialty chains, wholesalers, club stores, drug chains, mass merchandisers, convenience chains, health food distributors and food service customers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains reserves for estimated credit losses, and historically, such losses have been within management’s expectations.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate fair value due to the relatively short maturity of the respective instruments.

 

Use of Estimates – The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other.”  ASU 2011-08 allows an entity to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. This pronouncement is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

 

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. This pronouncement is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

 

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS.” This pronouncement was issued to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for level 3 fair value measurements. This pronouncement is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this update on its financial position, results of operations, liquidity and disclosures.

INVESTMENTS
INVESTMENTS

2.                                    INVESTMENTS

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s investments at:

 

December 31, 2011

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses

 

Fair
Value

 

Continuous
Unrealized
Loss Position
less than 12
Months

 

Continuous
Unrealized
Loss Position
greater than 12
Months

 

Held to Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasuries

 

$

8,034

 

$

5

 

$

-

 

$

8,039

 

$

-

 

$

 -

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

29,034

 

 

1

 

 

-

 

29,035

 

-

 

-

 

Corporate bonds

 

 

2,022

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

2,022

 

-

 

-

 

Municipal securities

 

 

284,605

 

 

-

 

 

64

 

284,541

 

64

 

-

 

U.S. government agency securities

 

 

16,005

 

 

2

 

 

-

 

16,007

 

-

 

-

 

Available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate demand notes

 

 

58,924

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

58,924

 

-

 

-

 

Long-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Auction rate securities

 

 

3,320

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

3,320

 

-

 

-

 

Total

 

$

401,944

 

$

8

 

$

64

 

401,888

 

$

64

 

$

 -

 

Trading

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Auction rate securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,658

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Auction rate securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,874

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

434,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses

 

Fair
Value

 

Continuous
Unrealized
Loss Position
less than 12
Months

 

Continuous
Unrealized
Loss Position
greater than 12
Months

 

Held to Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasuries

 

$

66,521

 

$

-

 

$

2

 

$

66,519

 

$

2

 

$

-

 

Certificates of deposit

 

7,004

 

-

 

-

 

7,004

 

-

 

-

 

Municipal securities

 

71,266

 

-

 

15

 

71,251

 

15

 

-

 

U.S. government agency securities

 

19,688

 

-

 

8

 

19,680

 

8

 

-

 

Available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate demand notes

 

56,107

 

-

 

-

 

56,107

 

-

 

-

 

Long-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Auction rate securities

 

27,790

 

-

 

2,408

 

25,382

 

-

 

2,408

 

Total

 

$

248,376

 

$

-

 

$

2,433

 

245,943

 

$

25

 

$

2,408

 

Trading

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Auction rate securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,063

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Auction rate securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,807

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

288,813

 

 

 

 

 

 

During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, realized gains or losses recognized on the sale of investments were not significant.

 

All of the Company’s investments at December 31, 2011 and 2010 in U.S. Treasuries, certificates of deposit, corporate bonds, municipal securities, U.S. government agency securities and variable rate demand notes (“VRDNs” - see Note 3) carry investment grade credit ratings. The majority of the Company’s investments at December 31, 2011 and 2010 in municipal, educational or other public body securities with an auction reset feature (“auction rate securities”- see Note 3) also carry investment grade credit ratings.

 

The following table summarizes the underlying contractual maturities of the Company’s investments at:

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortized Cost

 

Fair Value

 

Amortized Cost

 

Fair Value

 

Less than 1 year:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasuries

 

$

 8,034

 

$

 8,039

 

$

 66,521

 

$

 66,519

 

Certificates of deposit

 

29,034

 

29,035

 

7,004

 

7,004

 

Corporate bonds

 

2,022

 

2,022

 

-

 

-

 

Municipal securities

 

284,605

 

284,541

 

71,266

 

71,251

 

U.S. government agency securities

 

16,005

 

16,007

 

19,688

 

19,680

 

Due 1 - 10 years:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate demand notes

 

5,775

 

5,775

 

3,001

 

3,001

 

Due 11 - 20 years:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate demand notes

 

12,716

 

12,716

 

11,002

 

11,002

 

Auction rate securities

 

5,158

 

5,158

 

10,305

 

9,819

 

Due 21 - 30 years:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate demand notes

 

27,902

 

27,902

 

30,426

 

30,426

 

Auction rate securities

 

25,134

 

25,134

 

48,779

 

46,857

 

Due 31 - 40 years:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate demand notes

 

12,532

 

12,532

 

11,678

 

11,678

 

Auction rate securities

 

5,559

 

5,559

 

11,576

 

11,576

 

Total

 

$

 434,476

 

$

 434,420

 

$

 291,246

 

$

 288,813

 

FAIR VALUE OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
FAIR VALUE OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

3.                                    FAIR VALUE OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

 

ASC 820 provides a framework for measuring fair value and requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available. The three levels of inputs required by the standard that the Company uses to measure fair value are summarized below.

 

·                 Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

·                 Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities.

 

·                 Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

ASC 820 requires the use of observable market inputs (quoted market prices) when measuring fair value and requires a Level 1 quoted price to be used to measure fair value whenever possible.

 

The following tables present the Company’s held-to-maturity investments at amortized costs as well as the fair value of the Company’s financial assets that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, segregated among the appropriate levels within the fair value hierarchy at:

 

December 31, 2011

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Cash

 

$

81,879

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

81,879

 

Money market funds

 

230,029

 

-

 

-

 

230,029

 

U.S. Treasuries

 

8,034

 

-

 

-

 

8,034

 

Certificates of deposit

 

-

 

69,078

 

-

 

69,078

 

Corporate bonds

 

-

 

2,022

 

-

 

2,022

 

Municipal securities

 

-

 

291,984

 

-

 

291,984

 

U.S. government agency securities

 

-

 

16,005

 

-

 

16,005

 

Variable rate demand notes

 

-

 

58,924

 

-

 

58,924

 

Auction rate securities

 

-

 

-

 

35,852

 

35,852

 

Put options related to auction rate securities

 

-

 

-

 

3,041

 

3,041

 

Total

 

$

319,942

 

$

438,013

 

$

38,893

 

$

796,848

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts included in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

311,908

 

$

47,423

 

$

-

 

$

359,331

 

Short-term investments

 

8,034

 

390,590

 

12,658

 

411,282

 

Investments

 

-

 

-

 

23,194

 

23,194

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

-

 

-

 

873

 

873

 

Other assets

 

-

 

-

 

2,168

 

2,168

 

Total

 

$

319,942

 

$

438,013

 

$

38,893

 

$

796,848

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Cash

 

$

50,202

 

$

-

 

$

-

 

$

50,202

 

Money market funds

 

242,001

 

-

 

-

 

242,001

 

U.S. Treasuries

 

85,521

 

-

 

-

 

85,521

 

Certificates of deposit

 

-

 

40,010

 

-

 

40,010

 

Municipal securities

 

-

 

81,899

 

-

 

81,899

 

U.S. government agency securities

 

-

 

19,688

 

-

 

19,688

 

Variable rate demand notes

 

-

 

56,107

 

-

 

56,107

 

Auction rate securities

 

-

 

-

 

68,252

 

68,252

 

Put option related to auction rate securities

 

-

 

-

 

3,768

 

3,768

 

Total

 

$

377,724

 

$

197,704

 

$

72,020

 

$

647,448

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts included in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

311,202

 

$

43,640

 

$

-

 

$

354,842

 

Short-term investments

 

66,522

 

154,064

 

24,063

 

244,649

 

Investments

 

-

 

-

 

44,189

 

44,189

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

-

 

-

 

2,983

 

2,983

 

Other assets

 

-

 

-

 

785

 

785

 

Total

 

$

377,724

 

$

197,704

 

$

72,020

 

$

647,448

 

 

A large portion of the Company’s short-term investments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as they are valued using quoted market prices, market prices for similar securities, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The types of instruments valued within Level 1 are those based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical securities, which include the Company’s investment in money market funds and U.S. Treasuries.  The types of instruments valued within Level 2 are those based on other observable inputs, specifically vendor pricing for similar securities, which include the Company’s certificates of deposit, corporate bonds, municipal securities, U.S. government agency securities and VRDNs. Such instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. VRDNs are floating rate municipal bonds with embedded put options that allow the bondholder to sell the security at par plus accrued interest. All of the put options are secured by a pledged liquidity source. While they are classified as marketable investment securities, the put option allows the VRDNs to be liquidated at par on a same day, or generally, on a seven day settlement basis.

 

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

Level 3
Auction Rate
Securities

 

Put Options

 

Level 3
Auction Rate
Securities

 

Put Options

 

Beginning Balance

 

$

68,252

 

$

3,768

 

$

84,325

 

$

-

 

Transfers to Level 3

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

Recognized (loss) gain included in income

 

(44)

 

(727)

 

(4,526)

 

3,768

 

Unrealized gain included in other comprehensive income

 

2,409

 

-

 

5,253

 

-

 

Settlements

 

(34,765)

 

-

 

(16,800)

 

-

 

Ending Balance

 

$

35,852

 

$

3,041

 

$

68,252

 

$

3,768

 

 

The Company’s Level 3 assets are comprised of auction rate securities and put options. A large portion of these auction rate securities carry an investment grade credit rating and are additionally backed by various federal agencies and/or monoline insurance companies. The applicable interest rate is reset at pre-determined intervals, usually every 7 to 35 days. Liquidity for these auction rate securities was typically provided by an auction process which allowed holders to sell their notes at periodic auctions.  Since 2008, the auctions for these auction rate securities failed. The auction failures have been attributable to inadequate buyers and/or buying demand and/or the lack of support from financial advisors and sponsors. In the event that there is a failed auction, the indenture governing the security in some cases requires the issuer to pay interest at a default rate that may be above market rates for similar instruments. The securities for which auctions have failed will continue to accrue and/or pay interest at their pre-determined rates and be auctioned every 7 to 35 days until their respective auction succeeds, the issuer calls the securities, they mature or the Company is able to sell the securities to third parties. As a result, the Company’s ability to liquidate and fully recover the carrying value of its auction rate securities in the near term may be limited. Consequently, these securities, except those that the Company intends to sell prior to December 31, 2012 as a result of the agreements described below, or those that were redeemed at par after December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are classified as long-term investments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

 

In June 2011, the Company entered into an agreement (the “2011 ARS Agreement”), related to $24.5 million of par value auction rate securities (the “2011 ARS Securities”).  Under the 2011 ARS Agreement, the Company has the right to sell the 2011 ARS Securities including all accrued but unpaid interest thereon (the “2011 Put Option”) as follows: (i) on or after July 1, 2013, up to $1.0 million aggregate par value; (ii) on or after October 1, 2013, up to an additional $1.0 million aggregate par value; and (iii) in quarterly installments thereafter based on a formula of the then outstanding 2011 ARS securities, as adjusted for normal market redemptions, with full sale rights available on or after April 1, 2016. The 2011 ARS Securities will continue to accrue interest until redeemed through the 2011 Put Option, or as determined by the auction process or the terms outlined in the prospectus of the respective 2011 ARS Securities when the auction process fails. Under the 2011 ARS Agreement, the Company has the obligation, should it receive written notification from the put issuer, to sell the 2011 ARS Securities at par plus all accrued but unpaid interest. During the year ended December 31, 2011, $3.7 million of par value 2011 ARS Securities were redeemed at par through normal market channels.

 

In March 2010, the Company entered into an agreement (the “2010 ARS Agreement”), related to $54.2 million of par value auction rate securities (the “2010 ARS Securities”).  Under the 2010 ARS Agreement, the Company has the right, but not the obligation, to sell the 2010 ARS Securities including all accrued but unpaid interest thereon (the “2010 Put Option”) as follows: (i) on or after March 22, 2011, up to $13.6 million aggregate par value; and (ii) equal semi-annual or annual installments thereafter with full sale rights available on or after March 22, 2013. The 2010 ARS Securities will continue to accrue interest until redeemed through the 2010 Put Option, or as determined by the auction process or the terms outlined in the prospectus of the respective 2010 ARS Securities when the auction process fails. During the year ended December 31, 2011, $27.1 million of par value 2010 ARS Securities were redeemed at par through the exercise of the 2010 Put Option and $4.0 million of par value 2010 ARS Securities were redeemed at par through normal market channels ($7.4 million of par value 2010 ARS Securities were redeemed at par through normal market channels during the year ended December 31, 2010).

 

The 2011 ARS Agreement and the 2010 ARS Agreement (collectively the “ARS Agreements”) represent firm commitments in accordance with ASC 815, which defines a firm commitment with an unrelated party, binding on both parties and usually legally enforceable, with the following characteristics: (i) the commitment specifies all significant terms, including the quantity to be exchanged, the fixed price, and the timing of the transaction; and (ii) the commitment includes a disincentive for nonperformance that is sufficiently large to make performance probable. The enforceability of the ARS Agreements results in the 2010 Put Option and the 2011 Put Option (collectively the “Put Options”), which are recognized as separate freestanding assets and are accounted for separately from the Company’s auction rate securities. The Put Options do not meet the definition of derivative instruments under ASC 815.  Therefore, the Company elected the fair value option under ASC 825-10 in accounting for the Put Options.  As of December 31, 2011, the Company recorded $3.0 million as the fair market value of the Put Options ($0.9 million current portion included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and $2.1 million long-term portion included in other assets) in the consolidated balance sheet, with a corresponding (loss) of ($0.7) million recorded in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2011, respectively (a $3.8 million gain was previously recognized through earnings during the year ended December 31, 2010).  The valuation of the Put Options utilized a mark-to-model approach which included estimates for interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows, adjusted for any bearer risk associated with the put issuer’s ability to repurchase the 2010 ARS Securities and the 2011 ARS Securities in installments, as indicated above, beginning March 22, 2011 and July 1, 2013, respectively, as well as the expected holding periods for the Put Options. These assumptions are typically volatile and subject to change as the underlying data sources and market conditions evolve. The Put Options will continue to be adjusted on each balance sheet date based on their then fair values, with any changes in fair values recorded in earnings.

 

At December 31, 2011, the Company held auction rate securities with a face value of $44.8 million (amortized cost basis of $35.9 million). A Level 3 valuation was performed on the Company’s auction rate securities as of December 31, 2011 resulting in a fair value of $3.3 million for the Company’s available-for-sale auction rate securities (after a $5.0 million impairment) and $32.5 million for the Company’s trading auction rate securities (after a $4.0 million impairment), which are included in short-term and long-term investments.  This valuation utilized a mark-to-model approach which included estimates for interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows, credit and liquidity premiums, as well as expected holding periods for the auction rate securities. These assumptions are typically volatile and subject to change as the underlying data sources and market conditions evolve.

 

ASC 320-10-35 indicates that an other-than-temporary impairment must be recognized through earnings if an investor has the intent to sell the debt security or if it is more likely than not that the investor will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis.  However, even if an investor does not expect to sell a debt security, it must compare the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis of the security, the entire amortized cost basis of the security will not be recovered (that is, a “Credit Loss” exists), and an other-than-temporary impairment shall be considered to have occurred. In the event of a Credit Loss and absent the intent or requirement to sell a debt security before recovery of its amortized cost, only the amount associated with the Credit Loss is recognized as a loss in the income statement. The amount of loss relating to other factors is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). ASC 320-10-35 also requires additional disclosures regarding the calculation of the Credit Loss and the factors considered in reaching a conclusion that an investment is not other-than-temporarily impaired.

 

In connection with the 2011 ARS Agreement, during the second fiscal quarter of 2011, the Company reclassified $24.5 million of auction rate securities from available-for-sale to trading in accordance with ASC 320, as the Company has the ability and intent to exercise the related 2011 Put Option beginning July 1, 2013.  In connection with the 2010 ARS Agreement, during the first fiscal quarter of 2010, the Company reclassified $54.2 million of auction rate securities from available-for-sale to trading in accordance with ASC 320, as the Company had the ability and intent to exercise the related 2010 Put Option beginning March 22, 2011.

 

The Company recognized a net loss through earnings on its trading securities as follows for the years ended December 31:

 

 

 

2011

 

 

2010

 

 

2009

 

(Loss) on transfer from available-for-sale to trading

 

$

(2,438

)

 

$

(4,876

)

 

$

-

 

Gain on trading securities sold

 

2,604

 

 

375

 

 

-

 

(Loss) gain on trading securities held

 

(210

)

 

572

 

 

-

 

Loss on trading securites

 

$

(44

)

 

$

(3,929

)

 

$

-

 

 

The Company determined that the $5.0 million impairment of its available-for-sale auction rate securities at December 31, 2011 was deemed other-than-temporary. The other-than-temporary impairment was deemed Credit Loss related.  The Company recorded no additional other-than-temporary impairment during the year ended December 31, 2011 ($0.6 million, $3.9 million and $0.5 million were previously deemed other-than-temporary Credit Loss related and were charged through earnings for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively). The factors evaluated to differentiate between temporary impairment and other-than-temporary impairment included the projected future cash flows, credit ratings actions, and assessment of the credit quality of the underlying collateral, as well as the other factors included in the valuation model for debt securities described above.

 

The net effect of (i) the acquisition of the 2011 Put Option during the second fiscal quarter of 2011; (ii) the revaluation of the Put Options as of December 31, 2011; (iii) the transfer from available-for-sale to trading of the 2011 ARS Securities during the second fiscal quarter of 2011; (iv) the revaluation of the Company’s trading auction rate securities as of December 31, 2011; (v) the redemption at par of certain 2011 ARS Securities and 2010 ARS Securities, including those redeemed at par through the exercise of the 2010 Put Option; and (vi) a recognized gain resulting from the redemption at par of a previously other-than-temporary impaired security during the first fiscal quarter of 2011, resulted in a (loss) of ($0.8) million included in other income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 2011. The net effect of (i) the acquisition of the 2010 Put Option during the first fiscal quarter of 2010; (ii) the revaluation of the 2010 Put Option as of December 31, 2010; (iii) the transfer from available-for-sale to trading of the 2010 ARS Securities during the first fiscal quarter of 2010; (iv) the revaluation of the Company’s trading auction rate securities as of December 31, 2010; (v) the redemption at par of certain 2010 ARS Securities; (vi) a recognized gain resulting from the redemption at par of a previously other-than-temporary impaired security during the first fiscal quarter of 2010; and (vii) an increase in the other-than-temporary impairment of certain auction rate securities, resulted in a (loss) of ($0.8) million included in other income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 2010. The net effect of an other-than-temporary impairment of certain auction rate securities, resulted a (loss) of ($3.9) million, included in other income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

The Company holds additional auction rate securities that do not have a related put option.  These auction rate securities continue to be classified as available-for-sale securities.  The Company intends to retain its investment in the issuers until the earlier of the anticipated recovery in market value or maturity.

 

Based on the Company’s ability to access cash and cash equivalents and other short-term investments and based on the Company’s expected operating cash flows, the Company does not anticipate that the current lack of liquidity of these investments will have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or working capital. If uncertainties in the credit and capital markets continue, or uncertainties in the expected performance of the issuer of the Put Option arise, or there are rating downgrades on the auction rate securities held by the Company, the Company may be required to recognize additional impairments on these investments.

INVENTORIES
INVENTORIES

4.                                    INVENTORIES

 

Inventories consist of the following at December 31:

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

2010

 

Raw materials

 

$

51,103

 

 

$

61,010

 

Finished goods

 

104,510

 

 

92,231

 

 

 

$

155,613

 

 

$

153,241

 

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, Net
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, Net

5.                                    PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, Net

 

Property and equipment consist of the following at December 31:

 

 

 

December 31,
2011

 

 

December 31,
2010

 

Land

 

$

3,626

 

 

$

3,076

 

Leasehold improvements

 

2,132

 

 

1,998

 

Furniture and fixtures

 

2,000

 

 

1,959

 

Office and computer equipment

 

6,727

 

 

5,541

 

Computer software

 

9,303

 

 

8,428

 

Equipment

 

33,286

 

 

20,150

 

Building

 

3,211

 

 

-

 

Vehicles

 

21,827

 

 

15,696

 

 

 

82,112

 

 

56,848

 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

(36,961

)

 

(22,297

)

 

 

$

45,151

 

 

$

34,551

 

INTANGIBLES, Net
INTANGIBLES, Net

6.                                    INTANGIBLES, Net

 

The following provides additional information concerning the Company’s intangibles as of December 31:

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

2010

 

Amortizing intangibles

 

$

1,059

 

 

$

1,047

 

Accumulated amortization

 

(504

)

 

(452

)

 

 

555

 

 

595

 

Non-amortizing intangibles

 

47,841

 

 

42,721

 

 

 

$

48,396

 

 

$

43,316

 

 

All amortizing intangibles have been assigned an estimated finite useful life and such intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis over the number of years that approximate their respective useful lives ranging from one to 25 years (weighted-average life of 20 years). Total amortization expense recorded was $0.05 million, $0.05 million and $0.07 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, future estimated amortization expense related to amortizing intangibles through the year ending December 31, 2016 is approximately $0.05 million per year.

DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS
DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS

7.                                    DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS

 

Amounts received pursuant to new and/or amended distribution agreements entered into with certain distributors, relating to the costs associated with terminating the Company prior distributors, have been accounted for as deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are recognized as revenue ratably over the anticipated life of the respective distribution agreement, generally 20 years. Revenue recognized was $9.3 million, $8.0 million and $7.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

DEBT
DEBT

8.                                    DEBT

 

The Company entered into a credit facility with Comerica Bank (“Comerica”) consisting of a revolving line of credit, which was amended in May 2010, under which the Company may borrow up to $10.0 million of non-collateralized debt.  The revolving line of credit is effective through June 1, 2012. Interest on borrowings under the line of credit is based on Comerica’s base (prime) rate minus up to 1.5%, or varying London Interbank Offered Rates up to 180 days, plus an additional percentage of up to 1.75%, depending upon certain financial ratios maintained by the Company. The Company had no outstanding borrowings on this line of credit at December 31, 2011. Letters of credit issued on the Company’s behalf, totaling $0.3 million under this credit facility, were outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the terms of its line of credit, which contains certain financial covenants, including certain financial ratios. If any event of default shall occur for any reason, whether voluntary or involuntary, Comerica may declare all or any portion outstanding on the line of credit immediately due and payable, exercise rights and remedies available to them, including instituting legal proceedings.

 

The Company’s debt of $1.1 million and $0.3 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, consisted of capital leases, collateralized by vehicles, payable over 12 months in monthly installments at various effective interest rates, with final payments ending on or before December 31, 2012.

 

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the assets acquired under capital leases had a net book value of $3.6 million and $2.1 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $2.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively.

 

Interest expense for capital lease obligations amounted to $0.05 million, $0.01 million and $0.05 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

9.                                    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

The Company is obligated under various non-cancellable lease agreements providing for office space, warehouse space, and automobiles that expire at various dates through the year 2020.

 

Rent expense under operating leases was $4.1 million, $3.8 million and $3.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

Future minimum rental payments at December 31, 2011 under the operating leases referred to above are as follows:

 

Year ending December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

  $

3,996

 

2013

 

3,385

 

2014

 

3,227

 

2015

 

3,241

 

2016

 

2,783

 

2017 and thereafter

 

1,411

 

 

 

  $

18,043

 

 

Contractual obligations – The Company has the following contractual obligations related primarily to sponsorships and other commitments as of December 31, 2011:

 

Year ending December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

  $

48,716

 

2013

 

24,737

 

2014

 

14,513

 

2015

 

7,116

 

2016

 

-

 

2017 and thereafter

 

-

 

 

 

  $

95,082

 

 

Purchase Commitments – The Company has purchase commitments aggregating approximately $44.2 million at December 31, 2011, which represent commitments made by the Company and its subsidiaries to various suppliers of raw materials for the production of its products. These obligations vary in terms, but are generally satisfied within one year.

 

The Company purchases various raw material items, including, but not limited to, flavors, ingredients, supplements, containers, milk and cream, from a limited number of resources.  An interruption in supply from any of such resources could result in the Company’s inability to produce certain products for limited or possibly extended periods of time. The aggregate value of purchases from suppliers of such limited resources described above for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $279.5 million, $186.4 million and $168.6 million, respectively.

 

The Company has a purchase commitment of approximately $8.2 million, which is related to an agreement to acquire an office building, including the real property thereunder and improvements thereon, located in Corona, CA.

 

Guarantees – The Company from time to time enters into certain types of contracts that contingently require the Company to indemnify parties against third party claims. These contracts primarily relate to: (i) certain agreements with the Company’s officers, directors and employees under which the Company may be required to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising out of their employment relationship, (ii) certain distribution or purchase agreements under which the Company may have to indemnify the Company’s customers from any claim, liability or loss arising out of any actual or alleged injury or damages suffered in connection with the consumption or purchase of the Company’s products or the use of Company trademarks, and (iii) certain real estate leases, under which the Company may be required to indemnify property owners for liabilities and other claims arising from the Company’s use of the applicable premises. The terms of such obligations vary and typically, a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated. Generally, the Company believes that its insurance coverage is adequate to cover any resulting liabilities or claims.

 

Litigation – In September 2006, Christopher Chavez purporting to act on behalf of himself and a certain class of consumers filed an action in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco, against the Company and its subsidiaries for unfair business practices, false advertising, violation of California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), fraud, deceit and/or misrepresentation alleging that the Company misleadingly labels its Blue Sky® beverages as manufactured and canned/bottled wholly in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Defendants removed this Superior Court action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “District Court”) under the Class Action Fairness Act and filed motions for dismissal or transfer.  On June 11, 2007, the District Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss Chavez’s complaint with prejudice.  On June 23, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (“Ninth Circuit”) filed a memorandum opinion reversing the decision of the District Court and remanded the case to the District Court for further proceedings.  The Company filed a motion to dismiss the CLRA claims; the plaintiff filed a motion for a decision on a preemption issue; and the plaintiff filed a motion for class certification.  On June 18, 2010, the District Court entered an order certifying the class, ruled that there was no preemption by federal law, and denied the Company’s motion to dismiss.  The class that the District Court certified initially consists of all persons who purchased any beverage bearing the Blue Sky mark or brand in the United States at any time between May 16, 2002 and June 30, 2006.  On September 9, 2010, the District Court approved the form of the class notice and its distribution plan; and set an opt-out date of December 10, 2010.  On January 27, 2012, the parties entered into a settlement agreement on terms acceptable to the Company. On February 23, 2012, the District Court granted preliminary approval of the class action settlement agreement. A final approval hearing is scheduled for May 11, 2012.  If approved, the Company does not believe that the settlement will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

In May 2009, Avraham Wellman, purporting to act on behalf of himself and a class of consumers in Canada, filed a putative class action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, in the City of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, against the Company and its former Canadian distributor, Pepsi-Cola Canada Ltd., as defendants.  The plaintiff alleges that the defendants misleadingly packaged and labeled Monster Energy® products in Canada by not including sufficiently specific statements with respect to contra-indications and/or adverse reactions associated with the consumption of the energy drink products.  The plaintiff’s claims against the defendants are for negligence, unjust enrichment, and making misleading/false representations in violation of the Competition Act (Canada), the Food and Drugs Act (Canada) and the Consumer Protection Act, 2002 (Ontario).  The plaintiff claims general damages on behalf of the putative class in the amount of CDN$20 million, together with punitive damages of CDN$5 million, plus legal costs and interest. The plaintiff’s certification motion materials have not yet been filed. The Company believes that any such damages, if awarded, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. In accordance with class action practices in Ontario, the Company will not file an answer to the complaint until after the determination of the certification motion.  The Company believes that the plaintiff’s complaint is without merit and plans a vigorous defense.

 

Securities Litigation — On September 11, 2008, a federal securities class action complaint styled Cunha v. Hansen Natural Corp., et al. was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “District Court”). On September 17, 2008, a second federal securities class action complaint styled Brown v. Hansen Natural Corp., et al. was also filed in the District Court.

 

On July 14, 2009, the District Court entered an order consolidating the actions and appointing lead counsel and the Structural Ironworkers Local Union #1 Pension Fund as lead plaintiff. On August 28, 2009, lead plaintiff filed a Consolidated Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws (the “Consolidated Class Action Complaint”).  The Consolidated Class Action Complaint purported to be brought on behalf of a class of purchasers of the Company’s stock during the period November 9, 2006 through November 8, 2007 (the “Class Period”).  It named as defendants the Company, Rodney C. Sacks, Hilton H. Schlosberg, and Thomas J. Kelly. Plaintiff principally alleged that, during the Class Period, the defendants made false and misleading statements relating to the Company’s distribution coordination agreements with Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (“AB”) and its sales of “Allied” energy drink lines, and engaged in sales of shares in the Company on the basis of material non-public information.  Plaintiff also alleged that the Company’s financial statements for the second quarter of 2007 did not include certain promotional expenses.  The Consolidated Class Action Complaint alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and sought an unspecified amount of damages.

 

On November 16, 2009, the defendants filed their motion to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b), as well as the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.  On July 12, 2010, following a hearing, the District Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint, with leave to amend, on the grounds, among others, that it failed to specify which statements plaintiff claimed were false or misleading, failed adequately to allege that certain statements were actionable or false or misleading, and failed adequately to demonstrate that defendants acted with scienter.

 

On August 27, 2010, plaintiff filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws (the “Amended Class Action Complaint”).  While similar in many respects to the Consolidated Class Action Complaint, the Amended Class Action Complaint drops certain of the allegations set forth in the Consolidated Class Action Complaint and makes certain new allegations, including that the Company engaged in “channel stuffing” during the Class Period that rendered false or misleading the Company’s reported sales results and certain other statements made by the defendants.  In addition, it no longer names Thomas J. Kelly as a defendant.  The Amended Class Action Complaint continues to allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and seeks an unspecified amount of damages.

 

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint on November 8, 2010.  At a hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint held on May 12, 2011, the District Court issued a tentative ruling that would grant the motion to dismiss as to certain of plaintiff’s claims, but would deny the motion to dismiss with regard to the majority of plaintiff’s claims.  The District Court has not, however, issued a final ruling.  The District Court held an additional hearing on the motion to dismiss on May 25, 2011, and has received supplemental submissions from the parties.  Defendants’ motion to dismiss remains sub judice.

 

The Amended Class Action Complaint seeks an unspecified amount of damages.  As a result, the amount or range of reasonably possible litigation losses to which the Company is exposed cannot be estimated. Although the ultimate outcome of this action cannot be determined with certainty, the Company believes that the allegations in the Amended Class Action Complaint are without merit.  The Company intends to vigorously defend against this lawsuit.

 

Derivative Litigation — On October 15, 2008, a derivative complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “District Court”), styled Merckel v. Sacks, et al.  On November 17, 2008, a second derivative complaint styled Dislevy v. Sacks, et al. was also filed in the District Court.  The derivative suits were each brought, purportedly on behalf of the Company, by a shareholder of the Company who made no prior demand on the Company’s Board of Directors.

 

On June 29, 2009, the District Court entered an order consolidating the Merckel and Dislevy actions.  On July 13, 2009, the District Court entered an order re-styling the consolidated actions as In re Hansen Derivative Shareholder Litigation, appointing Raymond Merckel as lead plaintiff and appointing lead counsel, and establishing a schedule for the filing of a consolidated amended complaint and for defendants’ response to such complaint.

 

On October 13, 2009, a purported Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint (the “Consolidated Derivative Complaint”) was filed.  The Consolidated Derivative Complaint named as defendants certain current and former officers, directors, and employees of the Company, including Rodney C. Sacks, Hilton H. Schlosberg, Harold C. Taber, Jr., Benjamin M. Polk, Norman C. Epstein, Mark S. Vidergauz, Sydney Selati, Thomas J. Kelly, Mark J. Hall, and Kirk S. Blower, as well as Hilrod Holdings, L.P.  The Company was named as a nominal defendant.  The factual allegations of the Consolidated Derivative Complaint were similar to those set forth in the Consolidated Class Action Complaint described above.  Plaintiff alleged that, from November 2006 to the present, the defendants caused the Company to issue false and misleading statements concerning its business prospects and failed to properly disclose problems related to its non-Monster Energy® brand energy drinks, the prospects for the Anheuser-Busch distribution relationship, and alleged “inventory loading” that affected the Company’s results for the second quarter of 2007.  Plaintiff further alleged that while the Company’s shares were purportedly artificially inflated because of those improper statements, certain of the defendants sold Company stock while in possession of material non-public information.  The Consolidated Derivative Complaint asserted various causes of action, including breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, violation of Cal. Corp. Code §§ 25402 and 25403 for insider selling, and unjust enrichment.  The suit sought an unspecified amount of damages to be paid to the Company and adoption of corporate governance reforms, among other things.

 

On January 8, 2010, the Company filed its motion to dismiss the Consolidated Derivative Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 23.1.  On March 2, 2010, plaintiff’s counsel filed a motion to amend the Consolidated Derivative Complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) for the purpose of replacing Mr. Merckel as lead plaintiff with another shareholder of the Company, Anastasia Brueckheimer.  Following a hearing on July 12, 2010, the District Court (i) permitted Ms. Brueckheimer to intervene in the Derivative Litigation as lead plaintiff and to file a Verified Complaint in Intervention (the “Complaint in Intervention”) similar in all material respects to the Consolidated Derivative Complaint; and (ii) dismissed the Complaint in Intervention, with leave to amend, on the ground that plaintiff’s allegations of demand futility were insufficient to excuse the failure to make a pre-suit demand on the Company’s Board of Directors.

 

On October 1, 2010, Ms. Brueckheimer filed a Verified Amended Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint (the “Amended Derivative Complaint”).  While the Amended Derivative Complaint asserted the same causes of action and contained many of the same substantive allegations as the Consolidated Derivative Complaint, it also advanced new allegations about “channel stuffing,” which were substantially similar to the allegations pled in the Amended Class Action Complaint.

 

The Company filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Derivative Complaint on December 20, 2010, on the ground that plaintiff had again failed adequately to allege demand futility.  Following a hearing on the Company’s motion to dismiss the Amended Derivative Complaint held on May 12, 2011, the District Court dismissed the Amended Derivative Complaint, with prejudice, on this ground.  On June 10, 2011, Ms. Brueckheimer filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  Prior to filing her opening brief, however, plaintiff agreed to withdraw her appeal.  On February 14, 2012, the parties filed a Stipulated Motion for Dismissal of the appeal with the Ninth Circuit, whereby plaintiff agreed to dismiss the appeal and the parties agreed to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection with the appeal and the underlying action.  By Order dated February 15, 2012, the Ninth Circuit granted the parties’ motion and dismissed plaintiff’s appeal.

 

In addition to the above matters, the Company is subject to litigation from time to time in the normal course of business, including claims from terminated distributors.  Although it is not possible to predict the outcome of such litigation, based on the facts known to the Company and after consultation with counsel, management believes that such litigation in the aggregate will likely not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

10.                           ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows at December 31:

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of tax benefit of $1.0 million at December 31, 2010

 

  $

 

  $

(1,478)

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

(1,547)

 

1,759 

 

Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

 

  $

(1,547)

 

  $

281 

 

TREASURY STOCK PURCHASE
TREASURY STOCK PURCHASE

11.                            TREASURY STOCK PURCHASE

 

October 12, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program for the repurchase of up to $250.0 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock (the “2011 Repurchase Plan”). No shares were repurchased under the 2011 Repurchase Plan during the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

On March 11, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of the Company’s common stock (the “2010 Repurchase Plan”). Under the 2010 Repurchase Plan, the Company purchased 5.0 million shares of common stock at an average purchase price of $35.63 per share, as adjusted for the stock split, for a total amount of $176.4 million, during the year ended December 31, 2011, which the Company holds in treasury. This repurchase exhausted the availability under the 2010 Repurchase Plan.

 

Under the 2010 Repurchase Plan, the Company purchased 1.2 million shares of the Company’s common stock at an average purchase price of $18.84 per share, as adjusted for the stock split, for a total amount of $23.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, which the Company holds in treasury.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

12.                            STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

The Company has two stock-based compensation plans under which shares were available for grant at December 31, 2011: the Monster Beverage Corporation 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan”) and the 2009 Monster Beverage Corporation Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “2009 Directors Plan”).

 

The 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan permits the granting of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards and other stock-based awards up to an aggregate of 14,500,000 shares of the common stock of the Company to employees or consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries. Shares authorized under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan are reduced by 2.16 shares for each share granted or issued with respect to a Full Value Award. A Full Value Award is an award other than an incentive stock option, a non-qualified stock option, or a stock appreciation right, which is settled by the issuance of shares. Options granted under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan may be incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, or non-qualified stock options. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) has sole and exclusive authority to grant stock awards to all employees who are not new hires and to all new hires who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The Compensation Committee and the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Executive Committee”) each independently has the authority to grant stock awards to new hires who are not Section 16 employees. Awards granted by the Executive Committee are not subject to approval or ratification by the Board or the Compensation Committee. Options granted under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan generally vest over a five-year period from the grant date and are generally exercisable up to 10 years after the grant date. As of December 31, 2011, 993,450 shares of the Company’s common stock have been granted, net of cancellations, and 13,506,550 shares of the Company’s common stock remain available for grant under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

 

The 2009 Directors Plan permits the granting of options, stock appreciation rights (each, an “SAR”), and other stock-based awards to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,600,000 shares of common stock of the Company to non-employee directors of the Company. The 2009 Directors Plan is administered by the Board of Directors. Each award granted under the 2009 Directors Plan will be evidenced by a written agreement and will contain the terms and conditions that the Board of Directors deems appropriate. The Board of Directors may grant such awards on the last business day prior to the date of the annual meeting of stockholders. Any award granted under the 2009 Directors Plan will vest, with respect to 100% of such award, on the last business day prior to the date of the annual meeting, in the calendar year following the calendar year in which such award is granted. The Board of Directors may determine the exercise price per share of the Company’s common stock under each option, but such price may not be less than 100% of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date an option is granted. Option grants may be made under the 2009 Directors Plan for 10 years from June 4, 2009. The Board of Directors may also grant SARs, independently, or in connection with an option grant. The Board of Directors may determine the exercise price per share of the Company’s common stock under each SAR, but such price may not be less than the greater of (i) the fair market value of a share on the date the SAR is granted and (ii) the price of the related option, if the SAR is granted in connection with an option grant. Additionally, the Board of Directors may grant other stock-based awards, which include awards of shares of the Company’s common stock, restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, and awards that are valued based on the fair market value of shares of the Company’s common stock. SARs and other stock-based awards are subject to the general provisions of the 2009 Directors Plan. The Board of Directors may amend or terminate the 2009 Directors Plan at any time.  As of December 31, 2011, options to purchase 52,950 shares of the Company’s common stock had been granted under the 2009 Directors Plan, and options to purchase 1,547,050 shares of the Company’s common stock remained available for grant.

 

The Company recorded $19.4 million, $16.9 million and $14.0 million of compensation expense relating to outstanding options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units (restricted stock units were granted to non-employee directors under the 2009 Directors Plan) during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

Stock Options

 

Under the Company’s stock-based compensation plans, all stock options granted as of December 31, 2011 were granted at prices based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company records compensation expense for employee stock options based on the estimated fair value of the options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula with the assumptions included in the table below. The Company records compensation expense for non-employee stock options based on the estimated fair value of the options as of the earlier of (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the non-employee to earn the stock option is reached or (2) the date at which the non-employee’s performance is complete, using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula with the assumptions included in the table below. The Company uses historical data to determine the exercise behavior, volatility and forfeiture rate of the options. Refer to “Change in Estimated Forfeiture Rate” within this Note 12 for additional information.

 

The following weighted-average assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of options granted during:

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

Dividend yield

 

0.0 %

 

0.0 %

 

0.0 %

 

Expected volatility

 

53.6 %

 

58.2 %

 

62.8 %

 

Risk free interest rate

 

1.5 %

 

1.9 %

 

2.5 %

 

Expected term

 

5.8 Years

 

5.9 Years

 

6.4 Years

 

 

Expected Volatility: The Company uses historical volatility as it provides a reasonable estimate of the expected volatility. Historical volatility is based on the most recent volatility of the stock price over a period of time equivalent to the expected term of the option.

 

Risk-Free Interest Rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury zero coupon yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option.

 

Expected Term: The Company’s expected term represents the weighted-average period that the Company’s stock options are expected to be outstanding. The expected term is based on expected time to post-vesting exercise of options by employees. The Company uses historical exercise patterns of previously granted options to derive employee behavioral patterns used to forecast expected exercise patterns.

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s activities with respect to its stock option plans as follows:

 

Options

 

Number of
Shares (In
Thousands)

 

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price Per
Share

 

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (In
Years)

 

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Balance at January 1, 2011

 

19,498

 

$

8.59

 

5.2

 

$

342,241

Granted 01/01/11 - 03/31/11

 

118

 

$

28.81

 

 

 

 

Granted 04/01/11 - 06/30/11

 

103

 

$

35.00

 

 

 

 

Granted 07/01/11 - 09/30/11

 

110

 

$

40.45

 

 

 

 

Granted 10/01/11 - 12/31/11

 

95

 

$

44.81

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

(1,178)

 

$

17.26

 

 

 

 

Cancelled or forfeited

 

(177)

 

$

21.25

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

 

18,569

 

$

8.57

 

4.1

 

$

696,371

Vested and expected to vest in the future at December 31, 2011

 

17,947

 

$

8.12

 

4.0

 

$

 681,183

Exercisable at December 31, 2011

 

14,366

 

$

5.17

 

3.1

 

$

587,578

 

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2011:

 

 

 

 

 

Options Outstanding

 

Options Exercisable

Range of Exercise
Prices ($)

 

Number
Outstanding (In
Thousands)

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)

 

Number
Exercisable
(In
Thousands)

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)

$0.22

-

$0.22

 

1,793

 

0.5

 

$0.23

 

1,793

 

$0.22

$0.27

-

$0.27

 

3,441

 

1.4

 

$0.27

 

3,441

 

$0.27

$2.09

-

$2.09

 

68

 

3.0

 

$2.09

 

68

 

$2.09

$3.29

-

$3.29

 

4,400

 

3.2

 

$3.29

 

4,400

 

$3.29

$5.64

-

$6.21

 

57

 

3.8

 

$6.13

 

57

 

$6.13

$8.44

-

$8.44

 

2,458

 

3.9

 

$8.44

 

2,458

 

$8.44

$11.36

-

$15.60

 

266

 

6.8

 

$13.49

 

119

 

$13.42

$15.86

-

$15.86

 

2,163

 

6.4

 

$15.86

 

1,066

 

$15.86

$15.94

-

$18.07

 

2,024

 

7.8

 

$17.76

 

606

 

$17.78

$18.64

-

$46.04

 

1,899

 

7.9

 

$25.39

 

358

 

$22.24

 

 

 

 

18,569

 

4.1

 

$8.57

 

14,366

 

$5.17

 

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $18.45 per share, $12.15 per share and $10.71 per share, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $23.0 million, $44.5 million and $13.0 million, respectively.

 

Cash received from option exercises under all plans for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $20.3 million, $20.8 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The excess tax benefit realized for tax deductions from non-qualified stock option exercises and disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $3.8 million, $12.4 million and $3.1 million, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2011, there was $40.3 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested shares granted to both employees and non-employees under the Company’s share-based payment plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.

 

Change in Estimated Forfeiture Rate

 

During the year ended December 31, 2009, based on historical experience, the Company modified the estimated annual forfeiture rate used in recognizing stock-based compensation expense for its most senior executives based on their dissimilar historical forfeiture experience as compared to the forfeiture experience for non-senior executives. This modification resulted in a change from a 3.0% forfeiture rate for all employees to a 0% forfeiture rate for senior executives and an 11.2% forfeiture rate for all other recipients. During the same period, the Company also realized a benefit from actual forfeiture experience that was higher than previously estimated for unvested stock options, resulting primarily from non-senior executives and other employee departures from the Company. The cumulative impact of the revised forfeiture rates reduced stock-based compensation expense by approximately $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units

 

Stock-based compensation cost for restricted stock awards and restricted stock units is measured based on the closing fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. In the event that the Company has the option and intent to settle a restricted stock unit in cash, the award is classified as a liability and revalued at each balance sheet date. Total cash paid to settle restricted stock unit liabilities and the increase in the liabilities for future cash settlements during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were not material.

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s activities with respect to non-vested restricted stock awards and non-vested restricted stock units as follows:

 

 

 

Number of
Shares (in
thousands)

 

 

Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value

Non-vested at January 1, 2011

 

12 

 

 

$

19.20

Granted 01/01/11 - 03/31/11

 

 

 

$

-   

Granted 04/01/11 - 06/30/11

 

56 

 

 

$

35.88

Granted 07/01/11 - 09/30/11

 

656 

 

 

$

42.04

Granted 10/01/11 - 12/31/11

 

18 

 

 

$

45.07

Vested

 

(16)

 

 

$

23.51

Forfeited/cancelled

 

(2)

 

 

$

42.04

Non-vested at December 31, 2011

 

724 

 

 

$

41.66

 

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of restricted stock units and restricted stock awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $41.65 and $19.20 per share, respectively. No restricted stock units or restricted stock awards were granted during the year ended December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2011, 0.7 million of restricted stock units and restricted stock awards are expected to vest.

 

At December 31, 2011, total unrecognized compensation expense relating to non-vested restricted stock awards and non-vested restricted stock units was $26.7 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years.

 

Employee and Non-Employee Share-Based Compensation Expense

 

The table below shows the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements for the twelve-months ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 for share-based compensation related to employees and non-employees. Employee and non-employee share-based compensation expense of $19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 is comprised of $4.9 million that relates to incentive stock options and $14.5 million that relates to non-qualified stock options. Employee and non-employee share-based compensation expense of $16.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 is comprised of $4.7 million that relates to incentive stock options and $12.2 million that relates to non-qualified stock options. Employee and non-employee share-based compensation expense of $14.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 is comprised of $2.7 million that relates to incentive stock options and $11.3 million that relates to non-qualified stock options. The portion of share-based compensation expense that relates to incentive stock options has not been considered in the tax benefit computation below.

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

Operating expenses

 

 $

19,423

 

 $

16,862

 

 $

14,041

Total employee and non-employee share-based compensation expense included in income, before income tax

 

19,424

 

16,862

 

14,040

Less: Amount of income tax benefit recognized in earnings

 

(6,646)

 

(4,234)

 

(4,358)

Amount charged against net income

 

 $

12,778

 

 $

12,628

 

 $

9,682

INCOME TAXES
INCOME TAXES

13.                            INCOME TAXES

 

Components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 $

146,385

 

 $

111,217

 

 $

107,503

State

 

22,526

 

27,139

 

22,332

Foreign

 

2,827

 

279

 

309

 

 

171,738