UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
or
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 333-124100
VWR FUNDING, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
56-2445503
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1310 Goshen Parkway
|
|
19380
|
|
PO. Box 2656
|
|
(Zip code)
|
|
West Chester, PA
|
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(610) 431-1700
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
15(d) of the Act. Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated file
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes
o
No
þ
As of December 31, 2008, there was no established public market for the registrants common stock,
par value $0.01 per share. The number of shares of the registrants common stock outstanding at
March 15, 2009 was 1,000.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
VWR FUNDING, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company, we, us, and our refer to VWR
Funding, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries before and/or after the Merger (as defined in
Item 1 Business), as the context requires.
i
PART I
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
Overview
We are a leader in the global laboratory supply industry. We provide distribution services to
a highly fragmented supply chain by offering products from a wide range of manufacturers to a large
number of customers. Our business is highly diversified across products and services, geographic
regions and customer segments.
Products we distribute include chemicals, glassware, equipment, instruments, protective
clothing, production supplies and other assorted laboratory products. We also provide certain
services to some of our customers, including technical services, on-site storeroom services and
laboratory and furniture design, supply and installation. We maintain operations in more than 20
countries and process approximately 50,000 order lines daily from more than 20 strategically located
distribution centers. Our principal customers are major pharmaceutical, biotechnology, industrial
and government organizations, as well as universities and schools.
The roots of our business date back to 1852. Following a series of business combinations, the
Company became part of Univar Corporation. In 1986, the Company became a publicly-traded company
following a spin-off from Univar and embarked on a substantial expansion program. In 1995, the
Company acquired Baxter Internationals industrial distribution business, more than doubling its
revenue base. In connection with this acquisition, Merck KGaA acquired 49.9% of the Companys then
outstanding shares and, in 1999, Merck KGaA took the Company private by acquiring the remainder.
During the period from 1995 through 1999, Merck KGaA actively built its scientific supplies
distribution business in Europe through a series of acquisitions. In 2001, Merck KGaA combined the
operations of the U.S. and European distribution businesses, and in 2002, consolidated them under a
common U.S. parent company, creating a leader in the global laboratory supply industry. On April 7,
2004, the Company was acquired from Merck KGaA by CDRV Investors, Inc. (CDRV) (the CD&R
Acquisition). CDRV was controlled by a private equity fund managed by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice,
Inc. (CD&R).
On June 29, 2007, CDRV completed a merger (the Merger) by and among CDRV, Varietal
Distribution Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Holdings), and Varietal
Distribution Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and subsidiary of Holdings (Merger Sub).
Pursuant to the Merger, Merger Sub merged with and into CDRV, with CDRV continuing as the surviving
corporation and assuming all of the debt obligations of Merger Sub. In addition, in connection with
the Merger, CDRV changed its name to VWR Funding, Inc. After giving effect to the Merger and
related transactions, the Company became a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of VWR Investors, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (VWR Investors), which is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings.
Holdings is a holding company owned by private equity funds managed by Madison Dearborn Partners,
LLC (Madison Dearborn), other co-investors and certain members of our management who have been
given the opportunity to purchase equity in Holdings pursuant to an equity incentive plan
established at the time of the Merger, who we collectively refer to as the equity investors. See
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the equity
investors.
The Merger, including the redemption of previous debt and the payment of related fees and
expenses, was financed by equity contributions of $1,425.0 million, the issuance of $675.0 million
aggregate principal amount of 10.25%/11.25% unsecured senior notes due 2015 (Senior Notes), the issuance of
$353.3 million and
125.0 million aggregate principal amount of 10.75% unsecured senior
subordinated notes due 2017 (Senior Subordinated Notes) and senior secured term loan borrowings
under a senior secured credit facility of $615.0 million and
600.0 million (the Senior Secured
Credit Facility).
We report our financial results on the basis of the following three business segments: North
American laboratory distribution (North American Lab), European laboratory distribution
(European Lab) and Science Education. Both the North American Lab and European Lab segments are
engaged in the distribution of supplies to customers in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical
device, chemical, technology, food processing and consumer products industries, as well as
governmental agencies, universities and research institutes, and environmental organizations.
Science Education is engaged in the assembly, manufacture and distribution of
scientific supplies and specialized kits principally to primary and secondary schools. Our
operations in Asia Pacific are engaged in regional commercial operations and support our North
American Lab and European Lab businesses. The results of our regional commercial operations in Asia
Pacific are included in our North American Lab segment. During 2007, we opened a shared services
center in Coimbatore, India and we have transferred certain functions from our North American and
European operations. The costs of operating our shared services center have been allocated to our
business segments based on relative utilization.
While under the ownership of CD&R, the Company focused on and completed several restructurings
to rationalize operating costs and improve our operating, sourcing, sales and marketing and
administrative capabilities. We intend to continue to increase the efficiency of our core
businesses, including the transition of certain functions to our shared services center in
Coimbatore, India. Also, we intend to focus on expanding our businesses through organic growth
initiatives, expanding our global presence in such regions as Asia Pacific, selective acquisitions
throughout the world, global sourcing and increased private label sales.
1
Customers and Markets
Management estimates that 2008 industry-wide annual revenues of the global laboratory supply
industry in which our North American Lab and European Lab segments primarily operate were
approximately $28 billion, based on trade association data. Our net sales in these segments are
influenced by, but not directly correlated with, the growth of research and development spending
from a diversified group of end-users, and we expect that demand may vary by type of end-user.
In relation to our Science Education segment, we estimate that industry-wide annual sales of
scientific supplies to primary and secondary schools in North America were in excess of $600
million. Industry sales levels are subject to fluctuations driven by changes in state and local
government funding, the timing of state by state new textbook adoption cycles and population
changes. Our Science Education segment is seasonal, with increased net sales and operating income
in the third quarter, in connection with school purchases of supplies in preparation for the
beginning of the new school year.
We maintain a diverse and stable customer base across a diversified array of end users and
geographies. Our customers include pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, chemical,
technology, food processing and consumer products companies. They also include universities and
research institutes, governmental agencies, environmental organizations and primary and secondary
schools. We serve our customers globally through our operations in more than 20 countries. We
established a presence in Asia Pacific in 2006 and plan to further expand in this region to respond
to the needs of our global customers who are expanding operations there.
We seek to be the principal provider of laboratory supplies to our customer base. We are a
principal provider of laboratory supplies to a majority of the worlds 20 largest pharmaceutical
companies, as well as three of the largest North American biotechnology buying consortia.
Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies represented approximately 35% of our 2008 net sales, and
together with universities and colleges, accounted for approximately 50% of our 2008 net sales. In
2008, our top 20 customers accounted for approximately 22% of our net sales, with no single
customer representing more than 3% of our net sales.
We also provide certain services to some of our customers, which are primarily comprised of
technical services, on-site storeroom services and laboratory and furniture design, supply and
installation. Service revenues represent only a small part of our business.
Products
We offer a wide range of products, including chemicals, glassware, plasticware, instruments
and other laboratory equipment, protective clothing, laboratory furniture and scientific
educational materials for primary and secondary schools. Our average order size is less than $500.
Many of our products, including chemicals, laboratory and production supplies and science education
products, are consumable in nature. These products are basic and essential supplies required by
research and quality control laboratories and represented approximately 75% of our net sales in
each of 2008, 2007 and 2006. We also offer durable products, including, but not limited to,
centrifuges, fume hoods, workstations, ovens, microscopes and cold storage equipment.
We distribute products sourced from a wide array of manufacturers and are a primary
distributor for a variety of major manufacturers. We offer customers a large selection of products
designed to meet their individual needs from a combination of premium, value-for-money and
lower-cost products.
Services
We provide services to customers ranging from single-site laboratories and/or production
facilities to large multinational corporations with multiple locations. These services cover a
broad range of customer needs and include technical services, on-site storeroom services and
laboratory and furniture design, supply and installation. While we believe the provision of
services is an important element of our value proposition to our customers, net sales and operating
income derived from such services are not material.
2
Distribution Network
Our distribution network consists of strategically located distribution centers and various
smaller regional service centers and just-in-time facilities for customer-specific requirements.
Customer contact centers have the responsibility for order entry and customer service. The
distribution centers receive products from manufacturers, manage inventory and fill and ship
customer orders. We also contract with Merck KGaA and other third parties to ship products directly
to our customers based on our instructions.
Our regional service centers are near selected customer locations and are designed to supply a
limited number of products to those customers that require a high level of service. We also operate
just-in-time facilities at or near customer sites to meet customer needs promptly.
Sales and Marketing
We market to customers through our global sales force, our websites, and our catalogs. We have
a global sales, sales support, customer service, pricing, marketing and category management
workforce. Supporting the field sales organization are specialist groups for e-business
integration, customized services, laboratory furniture, safety, environment, microbiology,
chromatography and life science.
The Internet has become an increasingly important tool for us. Net sales are derived, in part,
from e-business sales and marketing channels. Our website features a fully indexed and searchable
catalog covering our entire product line, is available in several languages and has been
custom-designed for many of the countries in which we do business. This electronic catalog includes
product descriptions, technical specifications and cross-referenced data in different languages
through individual country sites. This website allows customers to enter orders directly and
enables us to communicate new product releases, promotions and other news to our customers.
We also provide printed catalogs and other printed materials. Our general catalogs are printed
in several languages. The general catalogs are supplemented by specialty catalogs for specific
product lines.
Suppliers
We distribute products from a wide range of manufacturers. This includes a majority of the
major manufacturers of laboratory chemicals, glassware, plasticware, instruments and other
laboratory equipment, protective clothing and laboratory furniture who sell through distributors.
In many cases, we believe we are a principal distributor for these major manufacturers.
Merck KGaA is one of our major suppliers of chemical and other products. The Company has a
European distribution agreement with Merck KGaA, which has an initial term of five years ending April
2009, to distribute certain chemical products in Europe. During March 2009, we extended this
agreement for a second five-year term. Merck KGaA has the right to terminate this agreement if
certain events occur.
The Company also has five-year distribution agreements with affiliates of Merck KGaA, ending
April 2009, to distribute certain chemical products in North America and certain Bioscience
products in Europe and North America. The North America chemical distribution agreement will
automatically extend for a second five-year term, ending April 2014. Affiliates of Merck KGaA may
terminate the North America chemical distribution agreement if certain events occur. The North
American Bioscience distribution agreement expired on December 31, 2008, but we currently are in
discussions regarding the extension of this agreement.
Merck KGaA supplied products accounted for approximately 13% of our consolidated net sales in
2008, 2007 and 2006.
During 2005, the German Federal Cartel Office initiated an investigation with regard to our
European chemical distribution agreement. See Note 15(b) under Item 8 Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the
investigation.
3
Trademarks and Trade Names
We have more than 50 different registered and unregistered trademarks and service marks for
our products and services, substantially all of which are owned by us. In some cases, however, we
do not own the existing applications and registrations for our material trademarks or service marks
in each country in which we do business. Generally, registered trademarks have perpetual life,
provided that they are renewed on a timely basis and continue to be used properly as trademarks,
subject only to the rights of third parties to seek cancellation of the marks.
Our business is not dependent to a material degree on patents, copyrights or trade secrets
although we consider our catalogs, websites and proprietary software integral to our operations.
Although we believe we have adequate policies and procedures in place to protect our intellectual
property, we have not sought patent protection for our processes nor have we registered the
copyrights in any of our catalogs, websites or proprietary software. Other than licenses to
commercially available third party software, we have no licenses to intellectual property that are
significant to our business.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive environment. We compete in the global laboratory supply
industry primarily with two other major distributors, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. and Sigma
Aldrich Corporation. We also compete with many smaller regional, local and specialty distributors,
as well as with manufacturers selling directly to their customers. Competitive factors include
price, service and delivery, breadth of product line, customer support, e-business capabilities and
the ability to meet the special requirements of customers.
Some of our competitors are increasing their manufacturing operations both internally and
through acquisitions of manufacturers, including manufacturers that supply products to us. To date,
we have not experienced an adverse impact on our ability to continue to source products from
manufacturers that have been vertically integrated, although there is no assurance that we will not
experience such an impact in the future.
Government Regulation
Some of the products we offer and our operations are subject to a number of complex and
stringent laws and regulations governing the production, handling, transportation, import, export
and distribution of chemicals, drugs and other similar products, including the operating and
security standards of the United States Drug Enforcement Administration, the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Food and Drug Administration, the Bureau of Industry and
Security and various state boards of pharmacy as well as comparable state and foreign agencies. In
addition, our logistics activities must comply with the rules and regulations of the Department of
Transportation, the Federal Aviation Administration and similar foreign agencies. While we believe
we are in compliance in all material respects with such laws and regulations, any non-compliance
could result in substantial fines or otherwise restrict our ability to provide competitive
distribution services and thereby have an adverse impact on our financial condition. For
information on environmental, health and safety matters, see below under Environmental, Health
and Safety Matters.
Employees
As of December 31, 2008, we had approximately 6,800 employees, including approximately 3,500
employees in North America, approximately 2,900 employees in Europe and approximately 400 employees
in Asia Pacific. As of December 31, 2008, approximately 8% of our employees in North America are
represented by unions, and virtually all of our employees in Europe are represented by workers
councils and/or unions. While we believe our relations with our employees are good, there can be no
assurance that further union expansion will not occur and cause increased future costs.
Environmental, Health and Safety Matters
We are subject to a broad range of foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health and
safety laws and regulations, including those pertaining to air emissions, water discharges, the
handling, disposal and transport of solid and hazardous materials and wastes, the investigation and
remediation of contamination and otherwise relating to health and safety and the protection of the
environment and natural resources. As our global operations involve, and have involved, the
handling, transport and distribution of materials that are or could be classified as toxic or
hazardous, there is some risk of contamination and environmental damage inherent in our operations
and the products we handle, transport and distribute. Our environmental, health and safety
liabilities and obligations may result in significant capital expenditures and other costs, which
could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of
operations. We may be fined or penalized by regulators for failing to comply with
environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. In addition, contamination resulting from
our current or past operations may trigger investigation or remediation obligations, which may have
a material impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
4
Based on current information, we believe that any costs we may incur relating to environmental
matters will not be material. We cannot be certain, however, that identification of presently
unidentified environmental conditions, more vigorous enforcement by regulatory authorities or other
unanticipated events will not arise in the future and give rise to additional environmental
liabilities, compliance costs or penalties which could have a material impact on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. In addition, environmental laws and regulations are
constantly evolving and it is not possible to predict accurately the effect they, or any new
regulations or legislation, may have in future periods. We currently do not maintain third-party
insurance for most of any current or future environmental liabilities.
Available Information
We file or furnish annual and quarterly reports and other information with or to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). You may read and copy any documents we file at the
SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room. Our SEC filings are also
available to the public free of charge at the SECs website at
www.sec.gov.
You may also access our press releases, financial information and reports filed with or
furnished to the SEC (for example, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q and our Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those forms) online at
www.vwr.com.
Copies of any documents on our website are available without charge, and reports filed with or
furnished to the SEC will be available as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with
or furnished to the SEC. The information found on our website is not part of this or any other
report filed with or furnished to the SEC.
Corporate Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 1310 Goshen Parkway, P.O. Box 2656, West
Chester, PA 19380 and our telephone number is (610) 431-1700. Our Internet website is located at
www.vwr.com.
5
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to a number of important risks and uncertainties that are described below.
You should carefully consider these risks and all other information included in this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
.
Risks Related to Our Capital Structure
Our substantial indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
prevent us from fulfilling our debt or contractual obligations.
We have a substantial amount of debt, which requires significant interest and principal
payments. As of December 31, 2008, we had an aggregate principal amount of debt outstanding of
$2,815.6 million. Our high level of debt could have important consequences to us including the
following:
|
|
|
|
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our debt or contractual obligations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to debt
service payments, which would reduce the funds available for working capital, capital
expenditures, investments or acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business, future
business opportunities and the industry in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to any of our less leveraged
competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to a downturn in our business and both general and
industry-specific adverse economic conditions; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing at a favorable cost of borrowing, or
if at all, to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, investments, acquisitions
or other general corporate requirements.
|
Despite current indebtedness levels and restrictive covenants, we may incur additional indebtedness
in the future, which would intensify our leverage risks.
Although the terms of the indentures governing the Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes
and the credit agreement governing the Senior Secured Credit Facility restrict us and our
restricted subsidiaries from incurring additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to
exceptions and qualifications, including with respect to our ability to incur additional senior
secured debt. If we and/or our subsidiaries incur additional indebtedness, the risks that they and
we now face as a result of our leverage could intensify. If our financial condition or operating
results deteriorate, our relations with our creditors, lenders under the Senior Secured Credit
Facility and our suppliers may be materially and adversely affected.
Our debt agreements contain restrictions on our ability to operate our business and to pursue our
business strategies, and our failure to comply with, cure breaches of, or obtain waivers for
covenants could result in an acceleration of the due date of our indebtedness.
The credit agreement governing our Senior Secured Credit Facility and the indentures governing
the Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes contain, and agreements governing future debt
issuances may contain, covenants that restrict our ability to finance future operations or capital
needs, to respond to changing business and economic conditions or to engage in other transactions
or business activities that may be important to our growth strategy or otherwise important to us.
The credit agreement and the indentures restrict, among other things, our ability and the ability
of our subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or make distributions in respect of our capital stock or to make certain
other restricted payments or investments;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchase or redeem stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
make investments or other specified restricted payments;
|
6
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sell assets and subsidiary stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enter into mergers, consolidations and sales of substantially all assets.
|
We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain compliance with such covenants in the
future and, if we fail to do so, that we will be able to obtain waivers from the lenders or note
holders and/or amend the covenants.
Any breach of the covenants in the credit agreement or the indentures could result in a
default of the obligations under such debt and cause a default under other debt. If there were an
event of default under the credit agreement related to our Senior Secured Credit Facility that was
not cured or waived, the lenders under our Senior Secured Credit Facility could cause all amounts
outstanding with respect to the borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility to be due and
payable immediately. Our assets and cash flow may not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under
our Senior Secured Credit Facility and our obligations under the Senior Notes and Senior
Subordinated Notes if accelerated upon an event of default. If, as or when required, we are unable
to repay, refinance or restructure our indebtedness under, or amend the covenants contained in, our
Senior Secured Credit Facility, the lenders under our Senior Secured Credit Facility could
institute foreclosure proceedings against the assets securing borrowings under the Senior Secured
Credit Facility.
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows or access sufficient additional capital to
meet our debt obligations or to fund our other liquidity needs.
Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or future borrowings under
our Senior Secured Credit Facility or from other sources may not be available to us in an amount
sufficient, to enable us to make required interest payments on our indebtedness or to fund our
other liquidity needs, including capital expenditure requirements, investments, acquisitions and
other transactions that are important to the implementation of our business strategy.
Additionally, significant portions of our debt are scheduled to mature beginning in 2013, and we
will need to refinance or satisfy this debt as it matures. We may not be able to refinance our
maturing debt on favorable terms, or at all, based on general economic or market conditions, our
historical or projected growth or other factors beyond our control. If our cash flow from
operations or other liquidity sources are not sufficient to make required interest payments or we
are not able to refinance maturing debt on favorable terms, we may have to take actions such as
selling assets, seeking additional equity or debt capital on commercially unreasonable terms or
reducing or delaying important business transactions. Our Senior Secured Credit Facility and the
indentures governing the Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes restrict our ability to sell
assets and use the proceeds from such sales for purposes other than debt payment obligations.
Our ability to make payments on our debt obligations depends on our ability to receive dividends,
payments or other distributions from our subsidiaries.
We are a holding company operating principally through VWR International, LLC (VWR) and
certain of its subsidiaries. As a result, we are substantially dependent on dividends, payments or
other distributions from VWR (and such subsidiaries) to make payments on the Senior Notes, Senior
Subordinated Notes and borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. VWRs ability to make
such dividends, payments or other distributions will depend on its and its subsidiaries financial
and operating performance, which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic and competitive
conditions and financial and business factors, such as the following, which may be beyond our
control:
|
|
|
|
operating difficulties;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
increased operating costs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
decreased demand for the products and services we offer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
market cyclicality;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
product prices;
|
7
|
|
|
|
the response of competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
failure to successfully integrate acquisitions; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
delays in implementing or our inability to fund strategic projects.
|
In addition, the ability of VWR and its subsidiaries to pay such dividends and other
distributions also may be restricted by law.
A change in the control of the Company could require us to repay certain of our outstanding
indebtedness, and we may be unable to do so.
Upon a change of control, as defined in the indentures governing the Senior Notes and the
Senior Subordinated Notes, subject to certain conditions, we will be required to offer to
repurchase the notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to
the date of repurchase. The source of funds for that purchase will be our available cash or cash
generated from operations or other potential sources, including borrowings, sales of assets or
sales of equity. We may not have sufficient funds from such sources at the time of any change of
control to make required repurchases of notes tendered. In addition, the terms of our Senior
Secured Credit Facility limit our ability to repurchase the notes and certain change of control
events will constitute an event of default under the indentures. If the holders of the notes
exercise their right to require us to repurchase all of the notes upon a change of control, the
financial effect of this repurchase could cause a default under our other debt, even if the change
of control itself would not cause a default. Accordingly, it is possible that we will not have
sufficient funds at the time of the change of control to make the required repurchase of our other
debt and the notes or that restrictions in our Senior Secured Credit Facility and the indentures
will not allow such repurchases.
The interests of our controlling stockholders may conflict with your interests.
Private equity funds managed by Madison Dearborn indirectly own a substantial majority of our
common stock through their ownership interests in Holdings. The interests of these funds as equity
holders may conflict with your interests. The controlling stockholders may have an incentive to
increase the value of their investment or cause us to distribute funds at the expense of our
financial condition and liquidity position, subject to the restrictions in our Senior Secured
Credit Facility and the indentures. In addition, these funds have the indirect power to elect a
majority of our Board of Directors and appoint new officers and management and, therefore,
effectively could control many other major decisions regarding our operations. Furthermore, our
controlling stockholders are in the business of making investments in companies and may, from time
to time, acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. Our
controlling stockholders may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our
business and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. We have not
instituted any formal plans to address any conflicts of interests that may arise.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our business is affected by general economic conditions in the United States, Europe and the other
markets in which we operate, and the current global recession and instability in the capital and
credit markets could adversely impact our business in 2009 and for the foreseeable future.
Over the past year, most major economies have been in recession and the global capital and
credit markets have been experiencing unprecedented volatility and disruption. While U.S.,
European and Asian governments have taken various intervention measures to promote stability and
liquidity to their countries respective markets, there is no assurance that these programs
individually or collectively will have the desired effects. The failure of these measures to
address the global recession and the current volatility in the capital and credit markets,
including the general credit availability and liquidity issues facing us and our counterparties
(most importantly, our customers, suppliers and lenders), could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations. In particular, if current global economic
and market conditions continue or worsen, we could encounter:
|
|
|
|
a reduction in orders and/or less favorable pricing or terms from new and existing
customers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the inability to expand our customer base in existing or new markets;
|
8
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in product prices from our suppliers that we are not able to pass through to
our customers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an acceleration of payment terms to our suppliers and/or the imposition of more restrictive
credit terms and other contractual requirements;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a reduction in research and development spending by our customers, especially those in the
pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in the discretionary spending by schools and other customers to which we sell
products and services through our Science Education business;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the inability to access additional capital or refinance existing indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the need to record additional impairment charges against our goodwill and/or intangible and
other long-lived assets.
|
The demand for our products depends on the level of our customers research and development and
other scientific endeavors. Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be
harmed if our customers spend less on these activities.
Our customers are engaged in research, development and production in the pharmaceutical,
biotechnology, medical device, education, chemical, technology, food processing, consumer products
and other industries. The amount of customer spending on research, development and production has a
large impact on our sales and profitability. Our customers determine the amounts that they will
spend on the basis of, among other things, general economic conditions, their financial condition
and liquidity, spending priorities and their need to develop new products, which, in turn, is
dependent upon a number of factors, including their competitors research, development and
production initiatives. In addition, consolidation in the industries in which our customers operate
may have an impact on such spending as customers integrate acquired operations, including research
and development departments and their budgets. Our customers finance their research and development
spending from private and public sources. Government funding of scientific research and education
has varied for several reasons, including general economic conditions, growth in population,
political priorities, changes in the number of students and other demographic changes.
The general deterioration of economic conditions and instability in the capital and credit
markets could trigger further reductions in spending by our customers, especially certain of our
customers in the pharmaceutical industry, which have initiated restructuring of research functions
resulting in workforce reductions, facility closures and budget reductions, and certain of our
customers in the biotechnology industry, which are experiencing increased economic and liquidity
pressures. A continued reduction in spending by our customers could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The healthcare industry has and will continue to experience significant changes that could
adversely affect our business.
Many of our customers in the healthcare industry have experienced significant changes in the
last several years and are expected to continue to experience significant changes, including
reductions in governmental support of healthcare services, lower reimbursements for research and
development and adverse changes in legislation or regulations regarding the delivery or pricing of
healthcare services or mandated benefits. In response to these and other changes, some of our
customers have implemented actions in an effort to control and reduce costs, including:
|
|
|
|
development of large and sophisticated group purchasing organizations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
consolidation, especially in the case of pharmaceutical companies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchasing the products that we supply directly from manufacturers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the closing of domestic facilities and establishment of facilities at low-cost offshore
locations; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
significant reductions in and/or outsourcing of research, development and production
activities, including outsourcing to low-cost offshore locations.
|
9
The impact of past and potential future changes in the healthcare industry and our customers
reactions to them may result in our healthcare industry customers significantly reducing their
purchases of products and services from us or the prices they are willing to pay for those products
or services. In addition, we will need to adapt our business to maintain existing customer
relationships and develop new customer relationships as our customers consolidate or move
facilities to low-cost offshore locations or outsource certain activities domestically or to
low-cost offshore locations. For instance, we intend to continue our expansion into the Asia
Pacific region, but there is no assurance that we will be successful in maintaining relationships
with our existing customers who have established operations in that region or in developing new
customer relationships with the outsourcing organizations in that region.
We compete in a highly competitive market. Failure to compete successfully could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We compete globally with two other major distributors, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. and Sigma
Aldrich Corporation, as well as many smaller regional, local and specialty distributors, and with
manufacturers selling directly to their customers. The bases upon which we compete include price,
service and delivery, breadth of customer support, e-business capabilities and the ability to meet
the special requirements of customers.
Some of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do. Most of our
products are available from several sources, and some of our customers have relationships with
several distributors. Our agreements with customers generally provide that the customer can
terminate the agreement or reduce the scope of services provided pursuant to the agreement with
short or no notice. Lack of product availability, stemming from either our inability to acquire
products or interruptions in the supply of products from manufacturers, could have a material
adverse effect on our ability to compete. Our competitors could also obtain exclusive rights to
distribute some products, thereby foreclosing our ability to distribute these products. Vertically
integrated distributors may also have an advantage with respect to the total delivered product cost
of certain of their captive products. Additionally, manufacturers could increase their efforts to
sell directly to consumers and effectively bypass distributors like us. Consolidation in the global
laboratory supply industry could result in existing competitors increasing their market share
through business combinations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. The entry of new distributors in the industry could
also have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations depend upon maintaining our
relationships with manufacturers.
We currently offer products from a wide range of manufacturers. We are dependent on these
manufacturers for our supply of products. Our most significant dependence is on Merck KGaA and its
affiliates, which supplied products that accounted for approximately
13% of our net sales in 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Our ability to sustain our gross margins has been, and will continue to be, dependent in part
upon our ability to obtain favorable terms from our suppliers. These terms may be subject to
changes from time to time, and such changes could adversely affect our gross margins over time. In
addition, our results of operations and cash flows could be adversely impacted by the acceleration
of payment terms to our suppliers and/or the imposition of more restrictive credit terms and other
contractual requirements.
Some of our competitors are increasing their manufacturing operations both internally and
through acquisitions of manufacturers, including manufacturers that supply products to us. For
instance, in 2006, Fisher Scientific International Inc., a supplier of products to us and one of
our largest competitors, merged with Thermo Electron Corporation, another supplier to us, to form
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. To date, we have not experienced an adverse impact on our ability to
continue to source products from manufacturers that have been vertically integrated (including
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), although there is no assurance that we will not experience such an
impact in the future.
The loss of one or more of our large suppliers, a material reduction in their supply of
products or provision of services to us, extended disruptions or interruptions in their operations
or material changes in the terms we obtain from them, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
10
A significant part of our growth strategy is to engage in acquisitions or business combinations,
which will subject us to a variety of risks that could harm our business.
We intend to continue to review and complete selective acquisition opportunities throughout
the world as a part of our growth strategy. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
complete suitable acquisitions for a variety of reasons, including competition for acquisition
targets, the need for regulatory approvals, the inability of the parties to agree to the structure
or purchase price of the transaction and our inability to fund the transaction. In addition, any
completed acquisition will subject us to a variety of other risks:
|
|
|
|
we may need to allocate substantial operational, financial and management resources in
integrating new businesses, technologies and products, and management may encounter
difficulties in integrating the operations, personnel or systems of the acquired businesses;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
future acquisitions or business combinations might have a material adverse effect on our
business relationships with customers or manufacturers, or both, and could lead to a
termination of, or otherwise affect our relationships with, such customers or manufacturers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we may assume substantial actual or contingent liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we may incur substantial unanticipated costs or encounter other problems associated with
acquired businesses; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to retain the key personnel, customers and suppliers of the acquired
business.
|
The international scope of our operations may adversely affect our business.
We derived approximately 47% of our 2008 net sales from operations outside the United States,
and we are continuing to expand our sourcing, commercial operations and administrative activities
in Asia Pacific. Accordingly, we face certain risks, including:
|
|
|
|
restrictions on foreign ownership of subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tariffs and other trade barriers and restrictions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
political risks;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
differing laws or administrative practices;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
local business practices that are inconsistent with local or U.S. law, such as the
U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended (the FCPA), or other applicable
anti-bribery regulations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
disruptions in the efficiency and effectiveness of, and difficulty in overseeing
and managing, certain important administrative functions, including those that have been
or in the future may be transferred to our shared services center in Coimbatore, India;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences of operating in multiple jurisdictions.
|
In addition, an adverse change in laws or administrative practices in countries within which
we operate could have a material adverse effect on us. Our operations outside the United States
also may present additional risk with respect to compliance with government regulations and
licensing requirements.
11
We have incurred in 2008 and may in the future incur impairment charges on our goodwill and intangible assets, which could negatively impact our results of operations.
Goodwill included in our consolidated financial statements primarily represents the excess of
acquisition costs over the fair value of net assets acquired in connection with the Merger. Our
intangible assets with finite useful lives primarily relate to customer relationships and are
amortized over their respective estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis. Our
indefinite-lived intangible assets relate to our trademarks and trade names.
Goodwill and other intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life are not amortized and
are tested at least annually for impairment. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite
lives must also be tested for impairment between the annual tests if an event or change in
circumstance occurs that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the asset below its
carrying amount. Other amortizable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever
indication of potential impairment exists. The results of our 2008 impairment testing identified
impairments of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets aggregating $392.1 million.
As of December 31, 2008, goodwill and intangible assets represented approximately $3.8 billion
or 75% of our total assets. We may recognize additional impairment charges in the future should our
operating results or market conditions decline significantly due to, among other things, ongoing or
worsening recessionary or other macro economic pressures.
If we do not comply with existing government regulations or if we or our suppliers become subject
to more onerous government regulations, we could be adversely affected.
Some of the products we offer and our operations are subject to a number of complex and
stringent laws and regulations governing the production, handling, transportation, import, export
and distribution of chemicals, drugs and other similar products, including the operating and
security standards of the United States Drug Enforcement Administration, the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Food and Drug Administration, the Bureau of Industry and
Security and various state boards of pharmacy as well as comparable state and foreign agencies. In
addition, our logistics activities must comply with the rules and regulations of the Department of
Transportation, the Federal Aviation Administration and similar foreign agencies. While we believe
we are in compliance in all material respects with such laws and regulations, any non-compliance
could result in substantial fines, penalties or assessments or otherwise restrict our ability to
provide competitive distribution services and thereby have an adverse impact on our financial
condition. We cannot assure you that existing laws and regulations will not be revised or that new,
more restrictive laws will not be adopted or become applicable to us or the products that we
distribute.
If our suppliers become subject to more stringent laws, they may seek to recover any or all
increased costs of compliance from us by increasing the prices at which we purchase products from
them, and we may not be able to recover all such increased prices from our customers. Accordingly,
we cannot assure you that our business and financial condition will not be materially and adversely
affected by future changes in applicable laws and regulations applicable to our suppliers.
If any of our operations are found not to comply with applicable antitrust or competition laws, our
business may suffer.
Our operations are subject to applicable antitrust and competition laws in the countries in
which we conduct our business, in particular the United States and in the European Union. These
laws prohibit, among other things, anticompetitive agreements and practices. If any of our
commercial agreements are found to violate or infringe such laws, we may be subject to civil and
other penalties and/or third party claims for damages. Further, agreements that infringe these laws
may be void and unenforceable, in whole or in part, or require modification in order to be lawful
and enforceable. If we are unable to enforce any of our commercial agreements, whether at all or in
material part, our business could be adversely affected.
We are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, and costs to comply with
such laws and regulations, or any liability or obligation imposed under such laws or regulations,
could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to a broad range of foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health and
safety laws and regulations, including those pertaining to air emissions, water discharges, the
handling, disposal and transport of solid and hazardous materials and wastes, the investigation and
remediation of contamination and otherwise relating to health and safety and the protection of the
environment and natural resources. As our global operations involve and have involved the handling,
transport and distribution of materials that are or could be classified as toxic or hazardous,
there is some risk of contamination and environmental damage inherent in our operations and the
products we handle, transport and distribute. Our environmental, health and safety liabilities and
obligations may result in significant capital expenditures and other costs, which could negatively
impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may be fined or penalized by
regulators for failing to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. In
addition, contamination resulting from our current or past operations may trigger investigation or
remediation obligations, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Based on current information, we believe that any costs we may incur relating to
environmental, health and safety matters will not be material. We cannot be certain, however, that
identification of presently unidentified environmental, health and safety conditions, new
regulations, more vigorous enforcement by regulatory authorities or other unanticipated events will
not arise in the future and give rise to additional liabilities, compliance costs or penalties
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. In addition, environmental, health and safety laws and regulations are constantly
evolving and it is not possible to predict accurately the effect they may have in future periods.
We currently do not maintain third-party insurance for most of any current or future environmental
liabilities.
12
We are subject to product liability and other claims in the ordinary course of business.
Our business involves a risk of product liability, patent infringement and other claims in the
ordinary course of business arising from the products that we source from various manufacturers.
Our exposure to such claims may increase as we seek to increase the geographic scope of our
sourcing activities and sales of private label products. We maintain insurance policies, including
product liability insurance, and in many cases we have indemnification rights against such claims
from the manufacturers of the products we distribute. We cannot assure you that our insurance
coverage or indemnification agreements with manufacturers will be available in all pending or any
future cases brought against us. Furthermore, our ability to recover under any insurance or
indemnification arrangements is subject to the financial viability of our insurers, our
manufacturers and our manufactures insurers, as well as legal enforcement under the local laws
governing the arrangements. In particular, as we seek to expand our sourcing from manufacturers in
Asia Pacific and other developing locations, we expect that we will increase our exposure to
potential defaults under the related indemnification arrangements. Insurance coverage in general or
coverage for certain types of liabilities, such as product liability or patent infringement in
these developing markets may not be readily available for purchase or cost-effective for us to
purchase. Furthermore, insurance for liability relating to asbestos, lead and silica exposure is
not available, and we do not maintain insurance for product recalls. Accordingly, we could be
subject to uninsured and unindemnified future liabilities, and an unfavorable result in a case for
which adequate insurance or indemnification is not available could result in a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time, we are named as a defendant in cases that arise as a result of our
distribution of laboratory supplies, including litigation resulting from the alleged prior
distribution of products containing asbestos by certain of our predecessors or acquired companies.
While the impact of this litigation on us has typically been immaterial, there can be no assurance
that the impact of the pending and any future claims will not be material to our business,
financial condition and results of operations in the future.
If we are unable to hire, train and retain key personnel, our business, financial condition and
results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our success depends in large part upon our continuing ability to identify, hire, retain and
motivate skilled professionals. We face intense competition for these professionals from our
competitors, customers, suppliers and other companies within the industries in which we compete and
the geographical regions in which we operate. Any failure on our part to hire, train, and retain a
sufficient number of qualified professionals could have a significant adverse impact on our
business.
We depend heavily on the services of our senior management. We believe that our future success
will depend upon the continued services of our senior management. Our business may be harmed by the
loss of one or more members of our senior management. We currently do not maintain key-man life
insurance with respect to our executive officers.
We rely upon third parties to ship products to our customers and interruptions in their operations
could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We ship a significant amount of our orders through various independent package delivery
providers, and prompt shipment of our products is essential to our business. Strikes or other
service interruptions involving our carriers could cause our operating expenses to rise or
seriously harm our ability to fulfill our customers orders or deliver products on a timely basis,
or both. In addition, an increase in prices by these providers, due to increases in fuel prices or
otherwise, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations if we
are unable to find alternative providers or make adjustments to our selling prices.
Problems with or failure of our information services, its connectivity to our customers, suppliers
and certain service providers and the normal functioning of our telephone systems could
significantly disrupt our operations, which could reduce our customer or supplier base and could
harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends, in part, on the secure and uninterrupted performance of our information
services and telephone systems. Our systems, the systems of our customers, suppliers and service
providers, and the connectivity among such systems are vulnerable to disruption and damage from a
variety of sources, including system or network failures, malicious human acts and natural
disasters. Moreover, despite network security measures, our servers and those of our customers,
suppliers and service providers are potentially vulnerable to physical or electronic break-ins,
computer viruses and similar disruptive problems. While we have taken appropriate steps to improve
system redundancy and disaster recovery procedures, reduce our reliance on legacy systems and
reinforce the security of our information services, there can be no guarantee that failures,
disruptions or unauthorized intrusions will not occur. We currently do not maintain third-party
insurance for most of these types of events. Sustained or repeated system failures, service
disruptions or unauthorized intrusions that interrupt our ability to receive and process
orders, receive and process customer payments and deliver products in a timely manner could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
13
In addition, because we accept payment by credit card and similar payment instruments, our
ability to accept, process and settle credit card transactions is subject to rules and regulations
issued and/or amended from time to time by the payment card industry and by individual payment card
companies such as American Express, VISA, MasterCard and Discover. These rules and regulations,
which vary based on annual transaction volumes and transaction experience, require us to safeguard
customer information, including through maintaining minimum security standards for the manner in
which we capture, store, process and transmit such information. Our failure to comply with such
changing rules and standards can subject us to fines, restrictions or expulsion from these card
acceptance programs, which could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We plan to continue to make significant technology and infrastructure investments, with
particular emphasis in North America. Our technology initiatives are designed to enhance the
security, reliability and effectiveness of our operations to continue to provide high quality
service to our customers. The cost and potential problems and interruptions associated with the
implementation of our technology initiatives could disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our
operations in the near term.
We have not registered and in some cases do not own the existing applications and
registrations for our material trademarks or service marks in every country in which we do
business.
We serve our customers globally through our operations in more than 20 countries, and we have
more than 50 different registered and unregistered trademarks and service marks for our products
and services. Although we have registered our material trademarks in the United States and the
primary European countries in which we conduct business, we have not registered and in some cases
do not own the existing applications and registrations for our material trademarks or service marks
in all countries in which we conduct business. Our efforts and cost to protect our intellectual
property rights in certain countries, especially those in the Asia Pacific region, may only provide
us with limited protection. In addition, in some countries, we may be blocked from registering or
otherwise protecting certain of our marks by others who have already registered identical or
similar marks for similar goods or services, and in those cases, we run the risk of being sued for
infringement or being unable to effectively establish brand identity.
The failure to own and have enforceable rights in the trademarks and service marks used in our
business could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We are subject to currency risks with respect to our international operations and certain
outstanding foreign-denominated debt.
While we report our consolidated financial results in U.S. dollars, we derive a significant
portion of our sales and incur costs in foreign currencies (principally the Euro, the British pound
sterling and the Canadian dollar) from our operations outside the United States. For example, in
2008 and 2007, approximately 47% and 44% of our net sales, respectively, came from our operations
outside the United States, primarily from our operations in Europe and Canada. Fluctuations in the
relative values of currencies occur from time to time and could adversely affect our operating
results. Specifically, during times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, our reported international
sales and earnings will be reduced because the local currency will translate into fewer U.S.
dollars. This could also make it more difficult to pay amounts due on our debt, the majority of
which is denominated in U.S. dollars.
Although the majority of our outstanding debt is denominated in U.S. dollars, as of December
31, 2008, we had
725.0 million ($1,009.1 million on a U.S. dollar equivalent basis as of December
31, 2008) of foreign currency-denominated debt recorded on our U.S. dollar-denominated balance
sheet, which constitutes approximately 36% of our total outstanding debt. As a result, our
operating results are exposed to foreign currency risk with respect to this
indebtedness. Specifically, during times of a weakening U.S. dollar, the relative value of this
debt would increase, which could require us to record exchange losses.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
14
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
We own and lease office and warehouse space in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. We
maintain our corporate headquarters in West Chester, Pennsylvania for executive, financial, legal,
information systems, marketing and other administrative activities. Our European executive,
financial, legal, information systems, marketing and other administrative activities are in
Darmstadt, Germany and Haasrode, Belgium. As of December 31, 2008, the following table sets forth
information with respect to our significant distribution and other office facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Owned/Leased
|
|
Size
|
|
Type of Facility
|
|
Batavia, Illinois(1) *
|
|
Owned
|
|
300,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Briare, France(2)
|
|
Owned/Leased
|
|
358,675 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution/Repackaging and Mixing
|
|
Bridgeport, New Jersey(1) *
|
|
Owned/Leased
|
|
446,776 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Brisbane, California(1)
|
|
Leased
|
|
248,280 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Bruchsal, Germany(2)
|
|
Owned/Leased
|
|
218,906 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Buffalo, New York(3) *
|
|
Owned
|
|
127,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution/Assembly
|
|
Coimbatore, India(1)(2)(3)
|
|
Leased
|
|
33,022 sq. ft.
|
|
Shared Services
|
|
Darmstadt, Germany(2)
|
|
Leased
|
|
45,348 sq. ft.
|
|
Offices
|
|
Debrecen, Hungary(2)
|
|
Leased
|
|
67,188 sq ft.
|
|
Distribution/Repackaging and Mixing
|
|
Denver, Colorado(1)
|
|
Leased
|
|
130,091 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Dublin, Ireland(2)
|
|
Leased
|
|
77,067 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Haasrode, Belgium(2)
|
|
Owned
|
|
201,447 sq. ft.
|
|
Offices/Distribution/Repackaging and Mixing
|
|
Karlskoga, Sweden(2)
|
|
Leased
|
|
129,167 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Lutterworth, United Kingdom(2)
|
|
Leased
|
|
183,205 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Manati, Puerto Rico(1)
|
|
Owned
|
|
100,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Mexico City, Mexico(1)
|
|
Leased
|
|
63,948 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Milan, Italy(2)
|
|
Leased
|
|
13,563 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada(1)
|
|
Leased
|
|
114,000 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Mollet del Valles, Spain(2)
|
|
Leased
|
|
33,480 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Rochester, New York(3) *
|
|
Owned
|
|
339,060 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution/Manufacturing/Assembly
|
|
Singapore(1)(2)
|
|
Leased
|
|
27,034 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada(3)
|
|
Leased
|
|
24,318 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
Suwanee, Georgia(1)
|
|
Leased
|
|
168,925 sq. ft.
|
|
Distribution
|
|
West Chester, Pennsylvania(1)(3)
|
|
Leased
|
|
97,516 sq. ft.
|
|
Offices
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Subject to a mortgage lien under the Senior Secured Credit
Facility.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
North American Lab
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Science Education
|
We also lease various regional distribution centers and service facilities in North America,
Europe and Asia that support our sales and warehouse functions.
For information regarding our lease commitments, see Note 15(a) under Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
15
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For information regarding legal and regulatory proceedings and matters, see Note 15(b) under
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for
which information is incorporated by reference into this item.
On March 28, 2006, the Company was served with a complaint filed in the United States District
Court, Western District of New York, by Corning Incorporated (Corning) alleging a breach of
contract and unliquidated damages. In April 2006, Corning amended its complaint to allege trademark
and unfair competition claims. In January 2007, the Company filed counterclaims for breach of
rebate obligation, unfair competition and tortious interference. On November 10, 2008, the Company
and Corning mutually agreed to dismiss with prejudice this court proceeding and released each other
from all claims in this matter. The Companys laboratory supply business and Corning have resumed
conducting business together.
ITEM 4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
16
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
There is no established public trading market for our common stock. The number of shares of
our common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding at March 15, 2009 was 1,000, all of which was held
by VWR Investors.
Holdings was initially capitalized through the issuance of preferred units and common units in
connection with the Merger, and it has issued additional units and repurchased units since the
consummation of the Merger. See Recent Sales and Purchases of Unregistered Equity Securities
below for more information. There is no established public trading market for the preferred units
or common units. As of March 15, 2009, Holdings had 1,412,033 preferred units outstanding and
14,069,364 common units outstanding, and 262 holders of record of its common units. See Item 12
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding the beneficial ownership of the common
units and preferred units of Holdings.
Dividends
Our debt instruments and related agreements include significant restrictions on our and
Holdings ability to pay dividends on our respective common equity. See Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Indebtedness in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We did not pay any dividends on our common stock in 2007 or 2008. We
currently do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock other than in connection with the
repayment of intercompany debt, the funding of equity unit purchases by Holdings from terminated
management investors and/or the funding of company fees and expenses.
Holdings has not in the past paid any dividends on its common equity and it currently does not
expect to pay any dividends on its common equity in the foreseeable future, except for tax
distributions to the extent required by Holdings limited liability company operating agreement.
Recent Sales and Purchases of Unregistered Equity Securities
VWR Funding, Inc. did not sell or purchase any equity securities in 2008.
In 2008, Holdings sold 2,349.32 preferred units and 95,676.19 common units pursuant to
Holdings 2007 Securities Purchase Plan (the Successor Equity Plan), which was established upon
the consummation of the Merger to permit members of management, board members and consultants the
opportunity to purchase equity units of Holdings. The cash purchase price for all of these
issuances was $1,000 per preferred unit and $1.00 per common unit. The proceeds of these issuances
have ultimately been contributed to the Company as additional capital contributions. Holdings
purchased 5,972.65 common units in 2008 from employees whose employment with VWR was terminated in
2007 or 2008, in each case in accordance with Holdings purchase rights under the transaction
documents governing the employees purchases of the units. These purchases were funded by
Holdings subsidiaries.
All of the equity issued by Holdings under the Successor Equity Plan in 2008 were deemed
exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance upon Regulation D, Section
4(2) or Rule 701 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as transactions by an issuer not
involving a public offering, or transactions pursuant to compensatory benefit plans and contracts
relating to compensation. The recipients of securities in each of such transactions represented
their intentions to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale
in connection with any distribution of the securities. All recipients were either furnished with or
had adequate access to, through their relationship with us, information about Holdings.
See Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters for additional information regarding the equity investors in Holdings, and see
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions Management Equity Arrangements for additional
information regarding the Successor Equity Plan. See Note 13 under Item 8 Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the
Companys accounting pursuant to the Successor Equity Plan.
17
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected historical financial data presented below under the captions Income Statement
Data, Other Financial Data and Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the
year ended December 31, 2008 and for the period June 30 through December 31, 2007 are derived from
the consolidated financial statements of VWR Funding, Inc. subsequent to the Merger. The selected
historical financial data presented below under the captions Income Statement Data, Other
Financial Data and Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004 and for the period
January 1 through June 29, 2007 and for each of the periods in the two-year period ended December
31, 2006, and for the period from April 7 through December 31, 2004 are derived from the
consolidated financial statements of the Company prior to the Merger. The selected historical
financial data presented below under the captions Income Statement Data and Other Financial
Data for the period from January 1 through April 6, 2004 are derived from the consolidated
financial statements of the Companys prior predecessor, VWR International Corporation (and its
subsidiaries), prior to the CD&R Acquisition.
The term Prior Predecessor refers to the Company prior to the CD&R Acquisition, and the term
Predecessor refers to the Company subsequent to the CD&R Acquisition and prior to the Merger. The
term Successor refers to the Company following the Merger. As a result of the CD&R Acquisition
and the Merger, the Successor, Predecessor and Prior Predecessor periods are each presented on a
different cost basis and, therefore, are not comparable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Prior Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 7
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
June 29,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
April 6,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,759.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,822.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,699.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,257.6
|
|
|
$
|
3,138.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,212.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
793.2
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
2,693.8
|
|
|
|
1,311.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,230.1
|
|
|
|
2,374.3
|
|
|
|
2,334.5
|
|
|
|
1,652.7
|
|
|
|
|
588.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,065.4
|
|
|
|
511.4
|
|
|
|
|
469.2
|
|
|
|
883.3
|
|
|
|
803.7
|
|
|
|
559.5
|
|
|
|
|
205.2
|
|
|
SG&A expenses(1)
|
|
|
861.6
|
|
|
|
408.5
|
|
|
|
|
371.3
|
|
|
|
693.3
|
|
|
|
640.0
|
|
|
|
455.6
|
|
|
|
|
163.7
|
|
|
Impairment charges (2)
|
|
|
392.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger expenses (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
charges(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(188.3
|
)
|
|
|
102.9
|
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
191.0
|
|
|
|
143.1
|
|
|
|
103.9
|
|
|
|
|
41.5
|
|
|
Interest expense, net(5)
|
|
|
(283.9
|
)
|
|
|
(127.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98.5
|
)
|
|
|
(110.4
|
)
|
|
|
(104.0
|
)
|
|
|
(51.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense),
net(6)
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
(67.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before taxes and cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principal
|
|
|
(450.1
|
)
|
|
|
(91.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(33.9
|
)
|
|
|
79.1
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
|
35.8
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
|
|
115.5
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
(32.7
|
)
|
|
|
(20.9
|
)
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(15.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principal
|
|
|
(334.6
|
)
|
|
|
(49.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
|
46.4
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(334.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
46.4
|
|
|
$
|
21.5
|
|
|
$
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
116.1
|
|
|
$
|
53.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
$
|
41.4
|
|
|
$
|
33.9
|
|
|
$
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.9
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales
|
|
|
28.3
|
%
|
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
$
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
139.4
|
|
|
$
|
126.1
|
|
|
$
|
116.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets(7)
|
|
|
5,084.9
|
|
|
|
5,615.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,646.2
|
|
|
|
2,591.8
|
|
|
|
2,553.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
2,815.6
|
|
|
|
2,797.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,723.7
|
|
|
|
1,451.8
|
|
|
|
1,399.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,008.4
|
|
|
|
1,407.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62.9
|
|
|
|
321.3
|
|
|
|
338.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 Revised,
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R). The Company adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method.
Compensation expense related to stock options of $3.8 million, $2.7 million, $9.0 million and $4.6 million is included in
selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, for the periods June 30 through
December 31, 2007, January 1 through June 29, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we recognized aggregate impairment charges of $392.1 million, relating to the impairment
of goodwill and intangible assets. See Note 3 included in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Predecessor expenses associated with the Merger amounted to $36.8 million for the period January 1 June 29, 2007. These
expenses consisted of investment banking, legal, accounting and advisory fees related to the Merger. There were no Merger
expenses recognized after June 29, 2007.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
During 2005, we recorded pre-tax restructuring charges aggregating $20.6 million to rationalize and streamline our operations.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
As of January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157). See Notes 2 and 14 included in Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
As a result of the change in our capital structure related to the Merger, we have a significant amount of foreign-denominated
debt on our U.S. dollar-denominated balance sheet. Our net exchange gain of $22.1 million recorded during the year ended
December 31, 2008 is substantially related to our recognition of net unrealized gains associated with the weakening of the
Euro against the U.S. dollar. Our net exchange loss of $64.0 recorded
during the periods included in the year ended December 31, 2007 was
substantially related to our recognition of net unrealized losses associated with the strengthening of the Euro against the
U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48). At the date of adoption, we increased deferred tax assets by $1.3 million, decreased
goodwill by $1.6 million and decreased our reserves for uncertain tax positions by $0.3 million. See Note 11 included in
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
19
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cautionary Factors Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this
Form 10-K may constitute forward-looking statements. These statements may be preceded by, followed
by or include the words believes, expects, anticipates, intends, plans, estimates or
similar expressions. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and
projections about future events. Although we believe that our assumptions made in connection with
the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that the assumptions and
expectations will prove to be correct.
Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. You should not place undue reliance
on these statements. Forward-looking statements include the information in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K regarding, among other things:
|
|
|
|
managements forecasts, plans and strategies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
managements general expectations concerning the global laboratory supply industry;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
efficiencies and cost savings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income and margins;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
growth;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
economies of scale;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the economy;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
future acquisitions and dispositions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
litigation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
potential and contingent liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
taxes; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liquidity.
|
You should understand that the following important factors, in addition to those discussed in
Item 1A Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, could affect our future
results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed
or implied in our forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
|
actions by, and our ability to maintain existing business relationships and practices
with, suppliers, customers, carriers and other third parties;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loss of our key executive officers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to consummate and integrate potential acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the effect of political, economic and credit and financial market conditions, inflation
and interest rates worldwide;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the effect of changes in laws and regulations, including changes in accounting standards,
trade, tax, price controls and other regulatory matters;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
increased competition from other companies in our industry and our ability to retain or
increase our market shares in the principal geographical areas in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to generate sufficient funds to meet our debt obligations, capital
expenditure program requirements, ongoing operating costs, acquisition financing and working
capital needs.
|
20
All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are
expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements. In addition, all
forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We
undertake no obligations to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and related notes included in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
We generate our net sales primarily through the sale of products, and also, to a lesser
extent, through the provision of services, in the global laboratory supply industry. Services
comprise a small portion of our revenue. In 2008, we generated approximately 75% of our net sales
from the sale of consumable products, including chemicals. We offer exclusive, branded and private
label products that we source from a wide range of manufacturers. Our customer base is highly
diversified. Our principal customers are major pharmaceutical, biotechnology, industrial and
government organizations, as well as universities and schools. Our largest customer accounted for
less than 3% of our 2008 net sales.
We report our financial results on the basis of the following three business segments: North
American Lab, European Lab and Science Education. Both the North American Lab and European Lab
segments are engaged in the distribution of laboratory supplies to customers in the pharmaceutical,
biotechnology, medical device, chemical, technology, food processing and consumer products
industries, as well as governmental agencies, universities and research institutes, and
environmental organizations. Science Education is engaged in the assembly, manufacture and
distribution of scientific supplies and specialized kits principally to primary and secondary
schools. Our operations in Asia Pacific are engaged in regional commercial operations and support
our North American Lab and European Lab businesses. The results of our regional commercial
operations in Asia Pacific are included in our North American Lab segment.
The Merger and the financing transactions completed in connection with the Merger have had a
significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations and will continue to have a
significant impact in the future. Specifically, as a result of accounting for the Merger using the
purchase method of accounting, our assets and liabilities were adjusted to their respective fair
values. A significant portion of the purchase price was allocated to amortizable intangible assets.
Accordingly, non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization have increased subsequent to the
Merger. In addition, immediately after the Merger, we had approximately $2.7 billion of outstanding
indebtedness, compared to approximately $1.7 billion prior to the Merger. Accordingly, we are a
highly leveraged company and related interest expense has increased. This increase in our debt
obligations, together with the restrictions placed on us in the documents governing our debt
instruments, may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and
future business opportunities and may make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our business,
industry or the economy in general.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, our consolidated net sales and gross profit, as
reported, increased $237.2 million or 6.7% and $84.8 million or 8.6%, respectively, compared to the
periods included in the year ended December 31, 2007. During 2008, we reported growth in net sales
and gross profit in our North American Lab and European Lab segments; however, we reported
declining net sales and gross profit in these segments in the fourth quarter of
2008 primarily as a result of unfavorable economic conditions and negative effects of foreign
currency translation. During 2008, our net sales and gross profit declined in our Science Education
segment, compared to 2007, due to unfavorable economic conditions and the resulting reduction in
discretionary spending by schools. Our consolidated net loss, as reported, increased to $334.6
million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $74.6 million for the periods included in the
year ended December 31, 2007. Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 and
for the periods included in the year ended December 31, 2007 were impacted, in particular, by the
following factors:
|
|
|
|
the effects of the Merger, including increased depreciation, amortization and interest
expense in 2008 and 2007 and the recognition of certain Merger expenses in 2007;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our recognition of non-cash impairment charges during 2008 associated with goodwill and
intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions of certain businesses;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign currency exchange rates; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
foreign currency translation, including our recognition of net unrealized translation
gains (losses).
|
21
In addition to these factors, we believe that our results of operations and cash flows beyond
December 31, 2008 could be adversely impacted by:
|
|
|
|
a reduction in customer spending due, in part, to a general deterioration of economic
conditions, especially with respect to certain of our customers in the pharmaceutical
industry, which have initiated restructuring of research functions resulting in workforce
reductions, facility closures and budget reductions, and certain of our customers in the
biotechnology industry, which are experiencing increased economic and liquidity pressures;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rising product prices from our suppliers, as well as the acceleration of payment terms to
our suppliers and/or the imposition of more restrictive credit terms and other contractual
requirements; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in freight costs due to volatility in fuel prices.
|
We intend to minimize the impact of these risks by implementing market expansion initiatives,
continuing various cost-saving and productivity initiatives and passing on supplier product price
and freight cost increases to our customers. We believe that, through December 31, 2008, we have
been successful in protecting our laboratory business operating margins through the implementation of these measures.
Our prospective financial results could be adversely affected if these measures, or others we may
implement, are not sufficient in the future to cover additional cost increases or if the negative
global economic conditions worsen or are prolonged.
We also believe that general economic conditions in the United States and the resulting
reduction in discretionary spending by schools have adversely impacted, and may continue to
adversely impact, the financial results of our Science Education segment beyond December 31, 2008.
While this segment may benefit from governmental funding or economic stimulus initiatives, it is
difficult to anticipate the impact and timing of such actions on our customer spending.
During January 2009, in reaction to global economic and competitive pressures, we initiated
certain broad-based cost saving actions, including a general freeze on headcount and annual merit
increases in selected major markets, including the United States, and a modest reduction in
personnel. We anticipate cash outlays during 2009 of approximately $10.0 million to complete these
cost saving activities. We expect to recover these cash outlays through expense savings generally
over a one-year period.
Strategy
Our primary goal is to enhance our position as a leader in the global laboratory supply
industry. Toward this end, we have instituted a number of strategies to drive sustainable,
profitable growth through organic sales growth and selective acquisitions. The principal elements
of our strategy are outlined below:
Increase Productivity and Profitability.
Continuous improvement in our customer service and
support and distribution operations remains a cornerstone of our strategy. We will continue to
leverage our new shared services center in India to not only provide cost-effective business
support but enhanced service capabilities as well. Ongoing standardization of processes and systems
within our customer service network will bring enhanced service to our customer and supplier base.
Expand Global Presence.
We will continue to seek opportunities to expand our presence in
emerging markets as well as our global footprint through select acquisitions and expansion of
existing operations.
Targeted Acquisitions and Efficient Integration.
An important part of our strategy is to
accelerate the Companys growth through selective acquisitions in various locations throughout the
world. Selective acquisitions present an opportunity to leverage our existing infrastructure and to
establish in-country operations in new geographic areas.
Improve Sourcing Strategy.
By utilizing our global scale, strong relationships with our
multinational customers and suppliers and our primary focus on distribution, we intend to continue
developing mutually beneficial relationships with leading manufacturers. An important part of our
strategy involves providing our customers with a choice of products at varying price points. Global
sourcing and supplier integration are key elements of this strategy.
Increase Sales of Private Label Products.
Due to increasing demand by our customers for a
broad product offering, we will direct our sales and marketing efforts toward a balance between
exclusive, branded and private label product offerings. We believe this strategy is timely as
customers seek to realize productivity gains and reduce operating costs during the current global
recession.
22
Factors Affecting Our Operating Results
Effects of Merger
The Merger has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. As such, our assets
and liabilities were adjusted to their respective fair values as of June 29, 2007. This resulted in
an increased value assigned to identifiable intangible assets relating to customer relationships,
trademarks and trade names, certain adjustments to pension and post-retirement liabilities for
existing plans, the recognition of other fair value adjustments, an increase in deferred income tax
liabilities and the impact of the new debt and equity structure. The recognition of the fair value
of assets acquired has resulted in higher non-cash depreciation and amortization expense. In
addition, the new debt incurred in connection with the Merger has resulted in an increase in
interest expense.
Predecessor expenses associated with the Merger amounted to $36.8 million for the period
January 1 June 29, 2007. These expenses consisted of investment banking, legal, accounting and
advisory fees related to the Merger. There were no Merger expenses recognized after June 29, 2007.
Impairments of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
As a result of the Merger, and to a lesser extent due to acquisitions completed subsequent to
the Merger, we carry significant amounts of goodwill and intangible assets, including
indefinite-lived intangible assets, on our balance sheet. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we
recognized aggregate impairment charges of $392.1 million, relating to the impairment of goodwill
and intangible assets. The impairment charges were recognized for each of the Companys segments
($202.1 million in North American Lab, $88.0 million in European Lab and $102.0 million in Science
Education). We believe that the impairment charges recognized in our North American Lab and
European Lab segments were primarily a result of macro economic
factors (global recession and volatility in the financial markets), while the charges
recognized in our Science Education segment were due to a mix of macro economic and
industry-specific factors (reduction in discretionary spending by
schools). We did not recognize any impairment charges during 2007 or 2006. See
Note 3 included in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for more information on the impairment charges we recognized in the fourth quarter of
2008. We may recognize additional impairment charges in the future should our operating results or
market conditions decline significantly due to, among other things, ongoing or worsening
recessionary or other macro economic pressures.
Recent Acquisitions
The Company made the following acquisitions during 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
Entity Name
|
|
Product / Service Offering
|
|
Location
|
|
Business Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2008
|
|
Omnilab AG (Omnilab AG)
|
|
Laboratory supply
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2008
|
|
Spektrum-3D Kft (Spektrum)
|
|
Laboratory supply
|
|
Hungary
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2008
|
|
Jencons (Scientific) Limited (Jencons)
|
|
Laboratory supply
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 1, 2007
|
|
Omnilabo International B.V. (Omnilabo BV)
|
|
Laboratory supply
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2007
|
|
Bie & Berntsen A-S (B&B)
|
|
Laboratory supply
|
|
Denmark
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, 2007
|
|
KMF Laborchemie Handels GmbH (KMF)
|
|
Laboratory supply, including chemical and consumable products
|
|
Germany
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2006
|
|
Sino Chemical Company (Pte.) Limited
|
|
Laboratory supply, including chemicals, equipment and consumables
|
|
Singapore
|
|
North American Lab
|
The acquisitions noted above were funded through a combination of cash and cash equivalents on
hand and incremental borrowings made under the Companys Senior Secured Credit Facility.
23
Foreign Currency
We maintain operations primarily in North America and in Europe. In 2008, approximately 47% of
our net sales originated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, principally the Euro, the
British pound sterling and the Canadian dollar. As a result, changes in our reported revenues and
operating profits include the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We provide
constant currency assessments in the following discussion and analysis to remove the impact of
fluctuation in foreign exchange rates and utilize constant currency results in our analysis of
segment performance. We believe that our constant currency assessments are a useful measure,
indicating the actual results of our operations.
Earnings from our subsidiaries are not generally repatriated to the United States; therefore
we do not incur significant gains or losses on foreign currency transactions with our subsidiaries.
As a result of the change in our capital structure related to the Merger, we have a
significant amount of foreign-denominated debt on our U.S. dollar-denominated balance sheet. The
translation of foreign-denominated debt obligations that are recorded on our U.S.
dollar-denominated balance sheet is recorded in other income (expense) as an exchange gain or loss
each period. As a result, our operating results are exposed to risk
based on fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, principally with respect to the Euro. Our
net exchange gain of $22.1 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2008 is
substantially related to our recognition of net unrealized gains associated with the weakening of
the Euro against the U.S. dollar. Our net exchange loss of $64.0
recorded during the periods included in the year ended
December 31, 2007 was substantially related to our recognition of net unrealized losses associated
with the strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar.
Seasonality and Inflation
Our results of operations are subject to seasonal trends primarily affecting our Science
Education segment, which tend to result in increased net sales and operating income in the third
calendar quarter in comparison to other quarters of the year. For example, in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
approximately 40%, 40% and 35%, respectively, of our Science Education segments total net sales
were generated in the quarter ending September 30. This quarterly performance is typically due to
increased sales volume as schools purchase supplies in preparation for the beginning of the new
school year. Our results of operations are also subject to cyclical trends. For example, the
Science Education segments publisher kitting business tends to follow a five to six-year business
cycle based on certain large states adoption rates for new textbooks. We believe that 2007
represented the height of the most recent business cycle.
During 2008, 2007, and 2006, inflation has not had a significant impact on our results of
operations, as we believe we have been able to pass through the majority of these increases to our
customers. However, our earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected if we are unable to
pass through future cost increases arising from inflation.
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation
Until June 29, 2007, we were controlled by CD&R. As a result of the Merger, affiliates of
Madison Dearborn acquired control of the Company on June 29, 2007. Accordingly, the consolidated
financial statements found in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K reflect the results of operations, cash flows, and statements of
stockholders equity and other comprehensive income (loss) using Predecessor and Successor periods.
In order to provide investors a meaningful basis of comparing our results of operations in our
discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2008 to the year ended December 31, 2007
and for the year ended December 31, 2007 to the year ended December 31, 2006, the results of
operations for the Predecessor period (January 1, 2007 through June 29, 2007) have been combined
with the results of operations for the Successor period (June 30, 2007 through December 31, 2007)
as shown in the following table. This combined presentation is not consistent with U.S. GAAP, and
may yield results that are not strictly comparable on a period-to-period basis primarily due to the
impact of purchase accounting adjustments and the impact of changes in our capital structure
associated with the Merger.
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,822.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,699.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,522.0
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
1,311.3
|
|
|
|
1,230.1
|
|
|
|
2,541.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
511.4
|
|
|
|
469.2
|
|
|
|
980.6
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
408.5
|
|
|
|
371.3
|
|
|
|
779.8
|
|
|
Merger expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
102.9
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
164.0
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(130.4
|
)
|
|
|
(101.8
|
)
|
|
|
(232.2
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(67.2
|
)
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
(63.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(91.7
|
)
|
|
|
(33.9
|
)
|
|
|
(125.6
|
)
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(49.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(74.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that a combined 2007 results of operations presentation (as reported) is
comparable to our 2008 presentation and our historical 2006 presentation relative to net sales and
gross profit due to the fact that the Merger had substantially no impact on these components.
Consequently, we have not applied any pro-forma adjustments to these income statement captions in
the following discussion and analysis. Other income (expense) and income taxes for the 2007 period
were not adjusted as a pro-forma presentation would not provide a meaningful understanding of these
components of our operating results.
However, as a result of the Merger and our new capital structure, we have incurred higher
expenses, including depreciation and amortization and interest expense. Accordingly, for
comparative purposes in our discussion and analysis below of 2007 and 2006 results of operations,
with respect to SG&A expenses, operating income and interest expense, have been adjusted to reflect
pro-forma adjustments assuming the Merger occurred as of January 1, 2006. The pro-forma results do
not purport to be indicative of the results of operations which actually would have resulted had
the Merger occurred at the beginning of 2006, or of the future results of operations of the
Company. We refer to these components in the following discussion and analysis, after the effect of
pro-forma adjustments, on an as adjusted basis.
The financial information set forth herein for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes the
accounts of CDRV and its subsidiaries prior to giving effect to the Merger.
Components of Revenues and Expenses
Our net sales are derived primarily from the sale of laboratory supplies and scientific
educational materials. Net sales are also derived, to a lesser extent, from the provision of
services. Freight costs that are billed to our customers are included in net sales.
Our cost of goods sold consists primarily of the cost of inventory shipped and our cost of
labor for services. Cost of goods sold also includes freight expenses incurred to deliver products
to customers as well as credits for rebates earned from suppliers.
SG&A expenses primarily reflect the costs of operations dedicated to generating sales,
maintaining existing customer relationships, enhancing technology capabilities, receiving and
processing customer orders and maintaining our distribution center facilities. SG&A expenses also
include our corporate, administrative and shared-service costs and depreciation and amortization
expense.
25
Results of Operations
2008 Compared With 2007
Net Sales
The following table presents net sales and net sales growth by reportable segment for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
North American Lab
|
|
$
|
2,092.2
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,018.4
|
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
1,503.4
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,331.2
|
|
|
Science Education
|
|
|
163.6
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
|
|
172.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,759.2
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,522.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the mathematical sum of the 2007 Predecessor period
(January 1 through June 29, 2007) and Successor period (June 30
through December 31, 2007), without pro-forma adjustment.
|
Net sales for 2008 increased $237.2 million or 6.7% over 2007. Foreign currency and the
acquisitions of KMF, B&B, Omnilabo BV, Jencons, Spektrum and Omnilab AG (the Acquisitions)
increased net sales in 2008 by approximately $148.0 million. Accordingly, net sales from comparable
operations increased approximately $89.2 million or 2.5% in 2008 over 2007.
Net sales in our North American Lab segment for 2008 increased $73.8 million or 3.7% over
2007. Foreign currency increased net sales by approximately $2.8 million. Accordingly, net sales
from comparable operations increased approximately $71.0 million or 3.5% in 2008 over 2007. During
2008, net sales to pharmaceutical customers experienced only nominal growth while net sales to
educational, industrial and clinical customers and governmental agencies experienced a higher rate
of growth.
Net sales in our European Lab segment for 2008 increased $172.2 million or 12.9% over 2007.
Foreign currency and the Acquisitions increased net sales by approximately $145.2 million.
Accordingly, net sales from comparable operations increased approximately $27.0 million or 2.0% in
2008 over 2007. During 2008, net sales to pharmaceutical customers were essentially flat while we
experienced double-digit growth with our education customers and mid single-digit growth with our
industrial customers and governmental agencies.
Net sales in our North American Lab and European Lab segments have been negatively impacted
during 2008 due to a general slowdown in sales at certain of our large customers. During the fourth
quarter of 2008, sales growth in our lab businesses was negatively impacted by a reduction in
customer spending due, in part, to a general deterioration of economic conditions. Additionally,
certain of our customers in the pharmaceutical industry have initiated restructuring of research
functions resulting in workforce reductions, facility closures and budget reductions and certain of
our customers in the biotechnology industry have experienced increased economic and liquidity
pressures. These adverse general economic and industry conditions have continued into the first
quarter of 2009 and may continue to impact our lab businesses going forward.
Net
sales in our Science Education segment for 2008 decreased
$8.8 million or 5.1% from 2007. Declines were observed across all product lines and were primarily due to unfavorable economic
conditions and the resulting reduction in discretionary spending by schools. In addition, the
Science Education segments publisher kitting business tends to follow a five to six-year business
cycle based on certain large states adoption rates for new textbooks. We believe that 2007
represented the height of the most recent business cycle.
26
Gross Profit
The following table presents gross profit and gross profit as a percentage of net sales for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
1,065.4
|
|
|
$
|
980.6
|
|
|
Percentage of net sales (gross margin)
|
|
|
28.3
|
%
|
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents the mathematical sum of the 2007 Predecessor period
(January 1 through June 29, 2007) and Successor period (June 30
through December 31, 2007), without pro-forma adjustment.
|
Gross profit for 2008 increased $84.8 million or 8.6% over 2007. Foreign currency and the
Acquisitions increased gross profit in 2008 by $46.4 million. Accordingly, gross profit increased
$38.4 million or 3.9% over 2007, from comparable operations. We experienced gross margin
improvement in our North American Lab and European Lab segments in 2008. Gross margin improvement
in North American Lab is primarily due to efficient pricing as well as the impact of changes in our
customer mix. North American gross margin improvement was further
impacted by a $2.8 million
supplier-related liability reversal recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008. Gross margin
improvement in European Lab is primarily due to efficient pricing and changes in customer and
product mix, offset by increases in the cost of foreign-sourced goods primarily in the United
Kingdom due to a sharp decline in the value of the British pound sterling against the Euro during
the second half of 2008. Our gross profit from Science Education declined during 2008 primarily as
a result of unfavorable economic conditions and the resulting reduction in discretionary spending
by schools. Our Science Education gross margin declined during 2008 primarily as a result of a less
favorable sales mix and higher product costs.
SG&A Expenses
The following table presents SG&A expenses, as reported and as adjusted, and, in each case,
SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A expenses, as reported(3)
|
|
$
|
861.6
|
|
|
$
|
779.8
|
|
|
Percentage of net sales, as reported
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
22.1
|
%
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
Other adjustments(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A expenses, as adjusted
|
|
$
|
861.6
|
|
|
$
|
808.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of net sales, as adjusted
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
For 2007, represents the mathematical sum of the 2007 Predecessor
period (January 1 through June 29, 2007) and Successor period
(June 30 through December 31, 2007), without pro-forma adjustment.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Reflects pro-forma adjustments had the Merger occurred on January
1, 2007. The increases in depreciation and amortization are the
result of increases in the fair value of amortizable intangible
assets acquired and property and equipment, including the
revisions of estimated useful lives.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Represents pro-forma adjustments associated with management and
board service fees and executive officer salaries. Also reflects a
pro-forma adjustment to exclude $7.9 million of share-based
compensation associated with the acceleration of unvested stock
options and restricted stock units as a result of the change in
control caused by the Merger.
|
Adjusted SG&A expenses for 2008 increased $52.9 million or 6.5% over 2007. Foreign currency
and the Acquisitions increased adjusted SG&A expenses by approximately $38.6 million. Accordingly,
adjusted SG&A expenses from comparable operations increased approximately $14.3 million or 1.8%
over 2007. This increase in adjusted SG&A expenses reflects our continued spending discipline
across all segments. The increase in adjusted SG&A expenses was
primarily the result of wage and benefit increases,
increased spending on information technology in our North American Lab segment of approximately
$7.4 million, increased charges associated with certain cost reduction programs in our European Lab
segment of $3.0 million and a charge of $1.3 million relating to the write down of certain
long-lived assets within our Science Education segment.
27
Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we recognized aggregate impairment charges of $392.1
million, relating to the impairment of goodwill and intangible assets. The impairment charges were
recognized at each of the Companys segments ($202.1 million in North American Lab, $88.0 million
in European Lab and $102.0 million in Science Education). We believe that the impairment charges
recognized in our North American Lab and European Lab segments were primarily a result of macro
economic factors, while the charges recognized in our Science Education segment were due to a mix
of macro economic and industry-specific factors. We did not recognize any impairment charges during
2007.
Merger Expenses
Predecessor expenses associated with the Merger amounted to $36.8 million for the period
January 1 June 29, 2007. These expenses consisted of investment banking, legal, accounting and
advisory fees related to the Merger. There were no Merger expenses incurred after June 29, 2007.
Operating (Loss) Income
The following table presents operating (loss) income, as reported and as adjusted, and, in
each case, operating (loss) income as a percentage of net sales by segment for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income, as reported:(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Lab
|
|
$
|
(95.3
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
105.9
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
80.9
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
Science Education
|
|
|
(95.8
|
)
|
|
|
(58.6
|
)%
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
Merger expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.8
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188.3
|
)
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)%
|
|
|
164.0
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A adjustments:(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Lab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Science Education
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income, as adjusted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Lab
|
|
|
(95.3
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
|
|
95.7
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
Science Education
|
|
|
(95.8
|
)
|
|
|
(58.6
|
)%
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
Merger Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.8
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(188.3
|
)
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
135.1
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
For 2007, represents the mathematical sum of the 2007 Predecessor period
(January 1 through June 29, 2007) and Successor period (June 30 through
December 31, 2007) by segment, without pro-forma adjustment.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
See notes (4) and (5) above for explanation of these pro-forma adjustments.
|
Adjusted operating income (loss) decreased $323.4 million from $135.1 million of income in
2007 to a $(188.3) million loss in 2008. Foreign currency and the Acquisitions increased adjusted
operating income by approximately $7.8 million over 2007. As discussed above, impairment charges
negatively impacted adjusted operating income by $392.1 million in 2008 and Merger expenses
negatively impacted adjusted operating income by $36.8 million
in 2007. The following table highlights the changes in adjusted
operating income (loss) from 2007 to 2008 by segment (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 operating
|
|
|
of goodwill
|
|
|
currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income (loss),
|
|
|
& intangible
|
|
|
and the
|
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2008 operating
|
|
|
|
|
as adjusted
|
|
|
assets
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
expenses
|
|
|
(explained
below)
|
|
|
(loss) income
|
|
|
North American Lab
|
|
$
|
95.7
|
|
|
$
|
(202.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.4
|
|
|
$
|
(95.3
|
)
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
(88.0
|
)
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
Science Education
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
(102.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
(95.8
|
)
|
|
Merger expenses
|
|
|
(36.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
135.1
|
|
|
$
|
(392.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.8
|
|
|
$
|
36.8
|
|
|
$
|
24.1
|
|
|
$
|
(188.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Operating income in our North American Lab segment for 2008 decreased $191.0 million from
2007. Impairment charges of $202.1 million negatively impacted
our operating income during
2008. Foreign currency decreased operating income in 2008 by approximately $0.3 million.
Accordingly, operating income increased approximately $11.4 million or 11.9% over 2007, from
comparable operations. The increase for 2008 was primarily the result of gross margin
improvement, driven by efficient pricing actions and customer mix. Improvements in gross
margin were partially offset by wage and benefit cost increases which were somewhat mitigated by
reductions in discretionary spending.
Operating income in our European Lab segment for 2008 decreased $62.2 million from 2007.
Impairment charges of $88.0 million negatively impacted our
operating income during 2008.
Foreign currency and the Acquisitions increased operating income in 2008 by approximately
$8.1 million. Accordingly, operating income increased approximately $17.7 million or 27.2%
over 2007, from comparable operations. The increase for 2008 was primarily the result of
gross margin improvement, driven by efficient pricing actions as well as favorable customer
and product mix. The increase in operating income for 2008 was further influenced by
disciplined spending practices and cost savings generated from cost reduction efforts.
Operating income in our Science Education segment for 2008 decreased $107.0 million from
2007. Impairment charges of $102.0 million negatively impacted
our operating income during
2008. Operating income from comparable operations declined primarily as the result of a
decrease in gross profit of $6.2 million from reduced customer demand and adverse product
mix, partially offset by decreases in adjusted SG&A expenses of $1.2 million. The decrease
in operating income for 2008 was primarily the result of unfavorable economic conditions and
the resulting reduction in discretionary spending by schools and
further due to a charge of $1.3 million related to the write
down of certain long-lived assets.
Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income
The following table presents the components of interest expense, net on an as reported and as
adjusted basis for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income(8)
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
Interest expense(8)
|
|
|
(289.6
|
)
|
|
|
(232.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net, as reported
|
|
|
(283.9
|
)
|
|
|
(225.9
|
)
|
|
Interest expense adjustments(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net, as adjusted
|
|
$
|
(283.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(270.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
For 2007, represents the mathematical sum of the 2007 Predecessor
period (January 1 through June 29, 2007) and Successor period
(June 30 through December 31, 2007), without pro-forma adjustment.
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
Reflects increased interest expense as a result of the new capital
structure. In determining these amounts, we used interest rates in
effect as of December 31, 2007, and included adjustments to
reflect the estimated effect of our interest rate swaps entered
into at the time of the Merger. For pro-forma purposes, interest
expense was reflected as if cash interest was paid on the Senior
Notes consistent with our actual elections to pay cash interest in
the year ended December 31, 2008 and the period from June 30
December 31, 2007, but this is not necessarily indicative of the
actual method of payment that may be selected in future periods.
|
Interest expense, net of interest income on an adjusted basis, was $283.9 million and $270.1
million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in adjusted net interest expense during 2008
is primarily attributable to increased borrowings under our
Senior Secured Credit Facility as well as increased interest expense on Euro-denominated debt
due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, interest expense was further
influenced in 2008 by our recognition of a net unrealized loss on interest rate swaps of $35.4
million. These increases were partially offset by the write-off of unamortized deferred financing
costs of $27.8 million in 2007 related to the debt obligations that were refinanced in connection
with the Merger and a commitment fee for a bridge loan of $3.4 million incurred in 2007. Our
recognition of net unrealized losses on our interest rate swap arrangements is due to our
discontinuance of hedge accounting with a corresponding decrease in variable rates of interest
during the fourth quarter of 2008. As a result of our discontinuance of hedge accounting under our
interest rate swap arrangements, interest expense may continue to fluctuate significantly from
period to period, however, such fluctuations will not impact the Companys operating cash flows
until realized. See Note 14 included in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on our interest rate swap arrangements.
29
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net was $22.1 million for 2008 compared to $(63.7) million for the
comparable period of 2007. Other income (expense) is primarily comprised of exchange gains
(losses). Our net exchange gain for 2008 is substantially related to our recognition of net
unrealized gains associated with the weakening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar. Our net
exchange loss for 2007 is substantially related to our recognition of net unrealized losses
associated with the strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar. Due to the significant
amount of foreign-denominated debt recorded on our U.S. dollar-denominated balance sheet, other
income (expense), net may continue to experience significant fluctuations.
Income Taxes
During the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the periods included in the year ended
December 31, 2007, we recognized an income tax benefit of $115.5 million and $51.0 million, on
pre-tax losses of $450.1 million and $125.6 million, respectively, resulting in an effective income
tax benefit of 25.7% and 40.6%, respectively. The benefit recognized
in 2008 reflects the impairment charges associated with our
indefinite-lived intangible assets. Impairment charges
associated with goodwill are generally not deductible for tax purposes.
The benefit recognized in the 2007 periods reflect our recognition of net operating losses and
an income tax benefit of $34.6 million related to a change in tax rates on deferred taxes on
European intangible assets, as a result of a reduction in the German income tax rate. The Company
recognized the impact of these rate changes, consistent with the date of enactment of the
legislation, offset by the recognition of tax expense of $25.5 million on dividends received from
foreign operations.
Changes
to our uncertain tax positions during 2008 and 2007 primarily relate
to pre-Merger contingencies, and accordingly, have increased or
decreased goodwill by a corresponding amount.
See Note 11 in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, for a further discussion of our uncertain tax positions.
2007 Compared With 2006
Net Sales
The following table presents net sales and net sales growth by reportable segment for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
North American Lab
|
|
$
|
2,018.4
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,966.0
|
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
1,331.2
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,137.6
|
|
|
Science Education
|
|
|
172.4
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
154.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,522.0
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,257.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the mathematical sum of the 2007
Predecessor period (January 1 through June 29, 2007)
and Successor period (June 30 through December 31,
2007), without pro-forma adjustment.
|
Net sales for 2007 increased $264.4 million or 8.1% over 2006. Foreign currency and the
acquisitions of KMF, B&B and Omnilabo BV increased net sales in 2007 by $161.7 million. Net sales
increased $102.7 million or 3.2% over 2006, from comparable operations.
Net sales in our North American Lab segment for 2007 increased $52.4 million or 2.7% over
2006. Foreign currency increased net sales by $11.4 million. Net sales increased $41.0 million or
2.1% over 2006, from comparable operations. During 2007, revenue
growth in our North American Lab segment primarily reflects the impact of favorable pricing
realization. Revenue growth in our North American Lab segment was constrained in 2007 due to lower
demand for production supplies as a result of certain customer facility closures, headcount and
cost reduction initiatives in some of our large accounts. During 2007, our net sales to customers
in the pharmaceutical-research industry experienced low-single digit growth and our net sales to
industrial customers achieved mid-single digit growth. These increases were partially offset by
weaker performance in net sales to our pharmaceutical-production and microelectronics customers.
30
Net sales in our European Lab segment for 2007 increased $193.6 million or 17.0% over 2006.
Foreign currency and the acquisitions of KMF, B&B and Omnilabo BV increased net sales in 2007 by
$150.3 million. Net sales increased $43.3 million or 3.8% over 2006, from comparable operations.
During 2007, the favorable revenue trends in our European Lab segment reflect favorable pricing,
increases in demand across virtually all product lines and most geographies and improved recovery
of freight costs. During 2007, we experienced higher growth from our pharmaceutical, industrial and
food & beverage customers offset by a lower rate of growth from public institutions and a decline
in net sales associated with our export business.
Net sales in our Science Education segment for 2007 increased $18.4 million or 11.9% over
2006. This increase was primarily a result of strong performance in our publisher, international
and Sargent Welch product lines, as compared to 2006. The Science Education segments publisher
kitting business tends to follow a five to six-year business cycle based on certain large states
adoption rates for new textbooks. We believe that 2007 represented the height of the most recent
business cycle.
Gross Profit
The following table presents gross profit and gross profit as a percentage of net sales for
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
980.6
|
|
|
$
|
883.3
|
|
|
Percentage of net sales (gross margin)
|
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents the mathematical sum of the 2007 Predecessor period
(January 1 through June 29, 2007) and Successor period (June 30
through December 31, 2007), without pro-forma adjustment.
|
Gross profit for 2007 increased $97.3 million or 11.0% over 2006. Foreign currency and the
acquisitions of KMF, B&B and Omnilabo BV increased gross profit in 2007 by $49.1 million. Gross
profit increased $48.2 million or 5.5% over 2006, from comparable operations. Our gross margin
percentages improved in our North American Lab and European Lab segments while remaining fairly
constant in our Science Education segment. The increase in gross margin in our North American Lab
segment is primarily a result of favorable pricing and improved product mix. The increase in gross
margin in our European Lab segment is primarily a result of favorable pricing, improved product
mix, as well as improvement in recovery of freight costs. Gross margin improvement in Science
Education was negatively impacted due to the increased volume associated with the publisher kitting
business in 2007, which yields a relatively lower profit margin.
SG&A Expenses
The following table presents SG&A expenses, as reported and as adjusted, and, in each case,
SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
SG&A expenses, as reported(3)
|
|
$
|
779.8
|
|
|
$
|
693.3
|
|
|
Percentage of net sales, as reported
|
|
|
22.1
|
%
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(4)
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
66.4
|
|
|
Other adjustments(5)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A expenses, as adjusted
|
|
$
|
808.7
|
|
|
$
|
760.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of net sales, as adjusted
|
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
For 2007, represents the mathematical sum of the 2007 Predecessor
period (January 1 through June 29, 2007) and Successor period
(June 30 through December 31, 2007), without pro-forma adjustment.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Reflects pro-forma adjustments had the Merger occurred on January
1, 2006. The increases in depreciation and amortization are the
result of increases in the fair value of our amortizable
intangible assets and property and equipment acquired, including
the revisions of estimated useful lives.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Represents incremental pro-forma adjustments associated with
share-based compensation, management and board service fees and
executive officer salaries. The year ended 2007 also reflects a
pro-forma adjustment to exclude $7.9 million of share-based
compensation associated with the acceleration of unvested stock
options and restricted stock units as a result of the change in
control caused by the Merger.
|
31
Adjusted SG&A expenses for 2007 increased $47.9 million or 6.3% over 2006. Excluding the
effects of foreign currency and the acquisitions of KMF, B&B and Omnilabo BV in 2007, which
increased SG&A expenses by $41.8 million, adjusted SG&A expenses increased $6.1 million or 0.8%
over 2006 primarily as a result of inflation and increased costs related to our global
sourcing/category management initiatives, on-going expansion in Asia Pacific and business
development activities. In addition, the Company has incurred costs in the expanded and on-going
training of its general and specialist sales force. Also contributing to the increase in 2007,
Science Education experienced increased costs necessary to support the increased sales activity
associated with the publishers business and bonus expense rose across all segments. Partially
offsetting these increases were external cost reductions related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance of
$5.0 million and savings derived from improved efficiencies in our service and distribution
centers, particularly in our North American Lab segment.
Merger Expenses
Predecessor expenses associated with the Merger amounted to $36.8 million for the period
January 1 through June 29, 2007. These expenses consisted of investment banking, legal, accounting
and advisory fees related to the Merger. There were no Merger expenses incurred during the period
June 30 through December 31, 2007 nor during 2006.
Operating Income
The following table presents operating income, as reported and as adjusted, and, in each case,
operating income as a percentage of net sales by segment for the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Operating income, as reported:(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Lab
|
|
$
|
105.9
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
112.2
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
80.9
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
59.4
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
Science Education
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
Merger expenses
|
|
|
(36.8
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164.0
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
191.0
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A adjustments:(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Lab
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Science Education
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income, as adjusted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Lab
|
|
|
95.7
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
79.5
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
European Lab
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
Science Education
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
Merger expenses
|
|
|
(36.8
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
135.1
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
123.5
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
For 2007, represents the mathematical sum of the 2007 Predecessor period
(January 1 through June 29, 2007) and Successor period (June 30 through
December 31, 2007) by segment, without pro-forma adjustment.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
See notes (4) and (5) above for explanation of these pro-forma adjustments.
|
32
Adjusted operating income for 2007 increased $11.6 million or 9.4% over 2006. Foreign currency
and the acquisitions of KMF, B&B and Omnilabo BV increased adjusted operating income by $7.3
million over 2006. Merger expenses negatively impacted adjusted operating income by $36.8 million
in 2007.
The
following discussion of operating income by segment is presented on an adjusted basis:
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income in our North American Lab segment for 2007 increased $16.2 million or
20.4% over 2006. Foreign currency increased adjusted operating income in 2007 by $0.5 million. In
2006, the Company recorded a $1.0 million restructuring credit. Excluding the effects of
foreign currency and the restructuring credit, adjusted operating income increased $16.7 million or
21.3% over 2006, from comparable operations. The increase was the result of an increase in
gross profit of $13.5 million and a decrease in adjusted SG&A expenses of $3.2 million.
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income in our European Lab segment for 2007 increased $34.4 million or 112.4%
over 2006. Foreign currency and the acquisitions of KMF, B&B and
Omnilabo BV increased adjusted operating income in 2007 by $6.8 million. Adjusted operating income increased $27.6 million or 90.2%
over 2006, from comparable operations. The increase was the result of an increase in gross
profit of $28.1 million partially offset by an SG&A expenses increase of $0.5 million.
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income in our Science Education segment for 2007 decreased $2.2 million or 16.4%
from 2006. This decrease was the result of an increase in SG&A expenses of $8.8 million
partially offset by a gross profit increase of $6.6 million.
|
Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income
The following table presents the components of interest expense, net on an as reported and as
adjusted basis for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Interest income(8)
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
Interest expense(8)
|
|
|
(232.2
|
)
|
|
|
(117.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net, as reported
|
|
|
(225.9
|
)
|
|
|
(110.4
|
)
|
|
Interest expense adjustments(9)
|
|
|
(44.2
|
)
|
|
|
(121.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net, as adjusted
|
|
$
|
(270.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(231.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
For 2007, represents the mathematical sum of the 2007 Predecessor
period (January 1 through June 29, 2007) and Successor period
(June 30 through December 31, 2007), without pro-forma adjustment.
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
Reflects increased interest expense as a result of the new capital
structure. In determining these amounts, we used interest rates in
effect as of December 31, 2007, and included adjustments to
reflect the estimated effect of our interest rate swaps entered
into at the time of the Merger. For pro-forma purposes, interest
expense is reflected as if cash interest will be paid on the
Senior Notes for the relevant periods.
|
Interest expense, net of interest income on an adjusted basis was $270.1 million and $231.8
million for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The 2007 increase was primarily due to the write-off of
unamortized deferred financing costs of $27.8 million related to the debt obligations of the
Company that were refinanced in connection with the Merger and a commitment fee for the bridge loan
of $3.4 million paid in 2007.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net was $(63.7) million and $(1.5) million during the periods included
in the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2006, respectively. Other
expense, net during 2007 primarily relates to $(64.0) million of net exchange losses. Our net
exchange loss during 2007 primarily relates to net unrealized losses associated with the
strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar.
33
Income Taxes
During the periods included in the year ended December 31, 2007 and for the year ended
December 31, 2006, on an as reported basis, we recognized an income tax benefit (provision) of
$51.0 million and $(32.7) million, on pre-tax (loss) income of $(125.6) million and $79.1 million,
respectively. The benefit recognized in the 2007 periods reflect our recognition of net operating
losses and an income tax benefit of $34.6 million related to a change in tax rates on deferred
taxes on European intangible assets, as a result of a reduction in the German income tax rate. The
Company recognized the impact of these rate changes, consistent with the date of enactment of the
legislation, offset by the recognition of tax expense of $25.5 million on dividends received from
foreign operations.
Our 2006 effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate as a result of a $1.3 million
reduction in deferred tax liabilities due to reduced future tax rates in Canada and lower charges
related to valuation allowances of approximately $3.0 million due to improved French operations,
partially offset by increased valuation allowances of approximately $1.0 million in Ireland where
the statutory tax is significantly lower.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our future financial and operating performance, ability to service or refinance our debt and
ability to comply with covenants and restrictions contained in our debt agreements will be subject
to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are
beyond our control and will be substantially dependent on the global economy, demand for our
products, and our ability to successfully implement our overall business and profitability
strategies. As of December 31, 2008, we had $42.0 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand and
our compensating cash balance totaled $100.7 million.
As of December 31, 2008, we had $2,815.6 million of outstanding indebtedness, including
$1,504.8 million of indebtedness under our Senior Secured Credit Facility, $675.0 million of Senior
Notes and $527.3 million of Senior Subordinated Notes. We also had unused availability of $183.6
million under our multi-currency revolving loan facility (which is a component of our Senior
Secured Credit Facility) as of December 31, 2008. From time-to-time, our liquidity needs cause the
aggregate amount of outstanding borrowings under our multi-currency revolving loan facility to
fluctuate. Accordingly, the amount of credit available to us can
increase or decrease based on changes in our operating cash flows,
debt service requirements and investment needs. All borrowings under the multi-currency revolving
loan facility bear interest at variable rates. Borrowings under the multi-currency revolving loan
facility are a key source of our liquidity.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility does not contain any financial maintenance covenants that
require the Company to comply with specified financial ratios or tests, such as a minimum interest
expense coverage ratio or a maximum leverage ratio, unless the Company wishes to incur additional
indebtedness associated with acquisitions or make certain restricted payments. The indentures
governing the Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes contain covenants that, among other
things, limit the Companys ability and that of its restricted subsidiaries to make restricted
payments, pay dividends, incur or create additional indebtedness, issue certain types of common and
preferred stock, make certain dispositions outside the ordinary course of business, execute certain
affiliate transactions, create liens on assets of the Company and restricted subsidiaries, and
materially change our lines of business. As of December 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance
with the covenants under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and with the indentures and related
requirements governing the Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes.
Based on the terms and conditions of these debt obligations and our current operations and
expectations for future growth, we believe that cash generated from operations, together with
remaining amounts available under our multi-currency revolving loan facility and our ability to
make certain non-cash payment-in-kind (PIK) interest elections under each of our Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated
Notes will be adequate to permit us to meet our current and expected operating, capital investment,
acquisition financing and debt service obligations, although no assurance can be given in this
regard. Given the state of capital markets, we continue to evaluate the
possibility of electing to make certain non-cash PIK interest elections as a means of funding
acquisition and investment opportunities. See Indebtedness Senior Notes and Senior
Subordinated Notes section below for more information on our non-cash PIK interest election
options. The majority of our long-term debt obligations will mature between 2013 and 2017. We currently
intend to reduce our debt to earnings ratio in advance of these maturities, which we believe will
be important as we seek to refinance or otherwise satisfy these debt obligations.
Financial markets continue to exhibit volatility and many market participants are experiencing
difficulty obtaining liquidity to fund their business needs. We continue to assess the potential
impact of current market conditions on various aspects of our liquidity, financial condition and
results of operations, including, but not limited to, the continued availability and general
creditworthiness of our debt and financial instrument counterparties, the impact of market
conditions on our customers, suppliers and our insurers and the
general recoverability and realizability of our long-lived assets and certain financial
instruments, including investments held under our defined benefit pension plans. To date, aside
from the recording of non-cash impairment charges related to the recoverability of our long-lived
intangible assets and goodwill and a general tightening of credit with certain suppliers, we have
not had a financial statement impact based on the aforementioned assessments. However, there can be no
assurance that our business, liquidity, financial condition or results of operations will not be
materially and adversely impacted in the future as a result of existing or future market
conditions. See Item 1A Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of
risks related to our capital structure.
34
Historical Cash Flows
In order to provide a meaningful basis of comparing our cash flows in the following discussion
and analysis of cash flow activity, we have combined our cash flow activity for the Predecessor
period (January 1, 2007 through June 29, 2007) with our cash flow activity for the successor period
(June 30, 2007 through December 31, 2007). This combined presentation is not consistent with U.S.
GAAP, and may yield results that are not strictly comparable on a period-to-period basis primarily
due to the impact of required purchase accounting adjustments and the impact of changes in our
capital structure associated with the Merger. Our operating cash flows were generally unaffected by
the Merger with the exception of increased cash paid for Merger expenses and interest.
Operating Activities
The following table presents cash flow from operations before investing and financing
activities related to operations and working capital (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations, excluding working capital
|
|
$
|
45.5
|
|
|
$
|
58.2
|
|
|
$
|
140.7
|
|
|
Cash flow from working capital changes, net
|
|
|
(36.8
|
)
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations
|
|
$
|
8.7
|
|
|
$
|
76.4
|
|
|
$
|
173.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the mathematical sum of the 2007 Predecessor period
(January 1 through June 29, 2007) and Successor period (June 30
through December 31, 2007), without adjustment.
|
We generated $8.7 million of cash from operating activities during 2008 compared to $76.4
million and $173.2 million during 2007 and 2006, respectively. The decrease in cash flow from
operations is primarily due to higher cash interest paid during the 2008 and 2007 periods. We paid
cash interest of $242.8 million, $140.8 million and $77.4 million during 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, with such increases reflecting the Companys new capital structure resulting from the
Merger.
Further impacting our cash flows from operations during 2008, we experienced fluctuations in
various components of our working capital. For example, trade accounts receivable used cash of
$(11.7) million during 2008 compared to $7.6 million of cash provided during 2007. This decrease in
cash flows was primarily the result of increased sales as receivable collection patterns were
essentially unchanged during 2008. In addition, inventories in 2008 provided $2.4 million of cash
compared to using $(13.3) million of cash during 2007. This increase in cash flows was due to, in
part, improved inventory management practices. Lastly, our trade accounts payable in 2008
represented a $(22.3) million use of cash as compared to $(7.8) million of cash used in 2007. The
decrease in cash provided by trade accounts payable was primarily due to a general tightening of
credit terms with certain suppliers, especially in the second half of 2008 as conditions in the
economy deteriorated. We anticipate continued pressure into 2009 with respect to vendor credit
terms and customer payment patterns. In addition, our cash disbursements follow a standardized
process, therefore, we expect to continue to experience fluctuations in cash flows associated with
trade accounts payable from period to period.
During 2007, we also experienced fluctuations in various components of our working capital.
For example, trade accounts receivable provided cash of $7.6 million during 2007 compared to
$(27.3) million of cash used during 2006. This increase was the result of our focus on improving
the quality of receivables as well as the timing of collection, in particular with respect to the
second half of 2007. In addition, inventories in 2007 represented a $(13.3) million use of cash
compared to providing $20.3 million of cash during 2006. This decrease in cash flows was the result
of increased inventory levels in 2007 associated with increased sales activity. In 2006,
inventories provided cash as we undertook a significant inventory reduction program. Lastly, our
trade accounts payable in
2007 represented a $(7.8) million use of cash as compared to $27.9 million of cash provided in
2006. The decrease in cash provided by trade accounts payable was primarily influenced by the
timing associated with the clearing of cash disbursements in relation to each calendar year end.
35
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $74.9 million, $3,887.0 million and $24.1 million
during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net cash used in the 2008 period was primarily associated
with the acquisitions of Jencons, Spektrum and Omnilab AG and ongoing capital expenditures,
partially offset by proceeds from the sales of property and equipment. Capital expenditures
increased during 2008 reflecting our investments in information technology and internet-based
infrastructure. The 2007 usage primarily relates to the Merger consideration paid and the
acquisitions of KMF, B&B and Omnilabo BV. The 2006 usage primarily relates to capital expenditures
of $23.6 million. We anticipate 2009 capital expenditures to approximate $30.0 million.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $65.0 million, $3,848.2 million and
$(139.1) million during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash provided during 2008 was primarily
due to net cash proceeds drawn from our Senior Secured Credit Facility used to meet our debt
service, acquisition financing and general working capital needs. Cash provided during 2007 was
primarily due to debt and equity issuances associated with the Merger. Cash used in 2006 was
primarily related to debt principal prepayments of $104.5 million on the Predecessor senior secured
credit facility, a decrease in bank checks outstanding of $33.4 million due primarily to the timing
of vendor payments, proceeds of $350.0 million from the issuance of the Predecessor senior floating
rate notes in December 2006, partially offset by a distribution to the holders of our common stock
of $343.5 million.
Schedule of Contractual Obligations
The following table details the Companys contractual obligations as of December 31, 2008
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
<1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
>5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility term loans
|
|
$
|
1,450.1
|
|
|
$
|
7.2
|
|
|
$
|
29.0
|
|
|
$
|
29.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,384.9
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility revolving facility
|
|
|
54.7
|
|
|
|
54.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes due 2015
|
|
|
675.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675.0
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017
|
|
|
527.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527.3
|
|
|
Predecessor Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
Interest(1)
|
|
|
1,413.3
|
|
|
|
216.3
|
|
|
|
411.6
|
|
|
|
413.5
|
|
|
|
371.9
|
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
Operating leases(2)
|
|
|
164.3
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
Compensating cash balance and other debt(3)
|
|
|
101.9
|
|
|
|
101.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
obligations(4)
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
Other(5)
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,441.1
|
|
|
$
|
425.2
|
|
|
$
|
496.4
|
|
|
$
|
479.5
|
|
|
$
|
3,040.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For purposes of calculating interest above, interest rates and
effects of foreign currency on the Senior Secured Credit Facility,
the Senior Subordinated Notes and our interest rate swap
arrangements were assumed to be unchanged from December 31, 2008
and we assumed cash interest will be paid on the Senior Notes and
Senior Subordinated Notes until maturity. In addition,
outstanding amounts under our multi-currency revolving loan
facility, a component of our Senior Secured Credit Facility, were
assumed to remain outstanding through the remaining term of the
multi-currency revolving loan facility (2013).
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
See Note 15 in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for further discussion
on our operating lease commitments.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Our compensating cash balance represents bank overdraft positions
of subsidiaries participating in our global cash pooling
arrangement with a third-party bank. Due to the nature of these
overdrafts, all amounts have been classified within the short-term
portion of debt at each period end. As of December 31, 2008, our
compensating cash balance was $100.7 million.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
The amounts in the table
reflect estimated cash payments to be made by the Company over the
next five years and thereafter with respect to certain pension
obligations. The pension obligations are included
in other long-term liabilities on our balance sheet as of December
31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Other includes $10.0 million related to cost saving actions
undertaken in January 2009 as well as $2.7 million related to the
funding of equity unit purchases by Holdings from terminated
management investors. See Item 5 Market for Registrants
Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities and Note 13 in Item 8 Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for
further discussion on the equity unit purchases by Holdings.
|
36
Noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities as of December 31, 2008 were $546.7 million.
Deferred tax liabilities are calculated based on cumulative temporary differences between the
financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. This amount is
not included in the table above because this presentation would not be meaningful. These
liabilities do not have a direct connection with the amount of cash taxes to be paid in any future
periods and do not relate to liquidity needs. In addition, the Company has excluded from the above
table uncertain tax liabilities as defined in FIN 48 due to the uncertainty of the period of
payment. The Company had uncertain tax liabilities of $8.6 million at December 31, 2008.
The employment agreements with our executive officers include non-compete, non-solicit and
non-hire covenants as well as severance provisions. In general, if the executive officer is
terminated without Cause or resigns for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in the
respective employment agreements) the executive officer is entitled to one and a half times (two
times in the case of our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer) the sum of base salary
plus the target bonus for the year in which such termination or resignation occurs and continued
health benefits for the 12-month period (18-month period in the case of our Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer) following termination or resignation. Salary and bonus payments are
payable in equal installments over the 12-month period following such termination or resignation.
The aggregate potential payments under these employment agreements for terminations without Cause
and resignations for Good Reason, including estimated costs associated with continued health
benefits, is approximately $11.7 million as of December 31,
2008. Effective June 30, 2009, Mr. Wyszomierski will retire as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of VWR Funding, Inc. and VWR International, LLC.
Indebtedness
See Note 10 in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K, for additional discussion of our debt obligations.
Senior Secured Credit Facility.
Our Senior Secured Credit Facility is with a syndicate of
lenders and provides for aggregate maximum borrowings consisting of (1) term loans denominated in
Euros in an aggregate principal amount currently outstanding of
600.0 million ($835.1 million on a
U.S. dollar equivalent basis as of December 31, 2008), (2) term loans denominated in U.S. dollars
in an aggregate principal amount currently outstanding of $615.0 million and (3) a multi-currency
revolving loan facility, providing for an equivalent in U.S. dollars of up to $250.0 million in
multi-currency revolving loans (inclusive of swingline loans of up to $25.0 million and letters of
credit of up to $70.0 million). The multi-currency revolving loan facility permits one or more of
our foreign subsidiaries to become foreign borrowers under such facility upon the satisfaction of
certain conditions.
Subject to the Companys continued compliance with its covenants, the Company may at any time
or from time to time request additional tranches of term loans or increases in the amount of
commitments under the its Senior Secured Credit Facility. The terms and conditions of any such
incremental new term loans or incremental new revolving credit commitments must be mutually
agreeable to the Company and existing and any new lenders. Additionally, the total amount
outstanding under any incremental new tranches of term loans or incremental new revolving credit
commitments may not exceed in aggregate the lesser of $300.0 million or an amount which would cause
the Company to exceed certain ratios. To present, the Company has not requested any such
incremental term loans or credit commitments. Based on current credit market conditions, we do not believe
we would be able to obtain any such incremental term loans or commitments in the near term.
As of December 31, 2008, an aggregate U.S. dollar equivalent of $54.7 million was outstanding
under the multi-currency revolving loan facility, consisting of $13.5 million in swingline loans
and £16.5 million ($24.2 million on a U.S. dollar equivalent basis) and $17.0 million of revolving
loans. In addition, we had $11.7 million of undrawn letters of credit outstanding. As of December
31, 2008, we had $183.6 million of available borrowing capacity under the multi-currency revolving
loan facility.
The
term loans will mature on June 30, 2014 and the multi-currency
revolving loan facility will mature on June 30, 2013.
Subject to any mandatory or optional prepayments, the principal amounts of the term loans require
quarterly amortization payments commencing on September 30, 2009 equal to 0.25% of their respective
original principal amounts drawn, with the final amortization
payments due at maturity. The Company is not required to make a
principal repayment on its outstanding term loans based on the Companys
excess cash flow (as defined under the Senior Secured
Credit Facility) calculation applicable to the year end
December 31, 2008.
37
As of December 31, 2008, the interest rates on the U.S. dollar-denominated and
Euro-denominated term loans were 2.96% and 5.19%, respectively, which include a variable margin of
2.5%. Amounts drawn under the multi-currency revolving loan facility bear interest at a weighted
average rate of 4.40%. As of December 31, 2008, there were no loans under our Senior Secured Credit
Facility denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, Euro and British pound sterling.
Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes
. The Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes,
and related guarantees, are unsecured obligations of the Company and are subordinate to all of the
Companys and the Subsidiary Guarantors obligations under all secured indebtedness, including any
borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility to the extent of the value of the assets
securing such obligations, and are effectively subordinate to all obligations of each of the
Companys subsidiaries that is not a guarantor of the Senior Notes or the Senior Subordinated Notes
(as the case may be). The Senior Notes, and related guarantees, rank senior in right of payment to
all of the Companys and the Subsidiary Guarantors existing and future subordinated indebtedness,
including the Senior Subordinated Notes.
The Senior Notes, which amount to $675 million as of December 31, 2008, will mature on July
15, 2015. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable twice a year, on each January 15 and July 15.
Until July 15, 2011, the Company may elect to pay interest on the Senior Notes (1) entirely in cash
(Cash Interest), (2) entirely by increasing the principal amount of the Senior Notes (PIK
Interest) or (3) 50% as Cash Interest and 50% as PIK Interest. PIK Interest will accrue on the
Senior Notes at a rate per annum equal to the cash interest rate of 10.25% plus 100 basis points.
To date, the Company has paid only Cash Interest, including on January 15, 2009.
The Senior Subordinated Notes are denominated in Euros in an aggregate principal amount
currently outstanding of
125.0 million ($174.0 million on a U.S. dollar equivalent basis as of
December 31, 2008) and in U.S. dollars in an aggregate principal amount currently outstanding of
$353.3 million. The Senior Subordinated Notes will mature on June 30, 2017. Interest on the Senior
Subordinated Notes is payable quarterly on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each
year. On any interest payment date on or prior to the third anniversary of the issuance of the
Senior Subordinated Notes (June 2010), the Company will have the option to capitalize up to
approximately 28% per annum of the interest payable on such date by capitalizing such interest and
adding it to the then outstanding principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes.
If the
Company makes an election to pay PIK interest under either the Senior Notes or Senior
Subordinated Notes, it shall become subject to additional restrictions on certain
payments and certain investments beginning on such election date and ending on the first
date after such interest period on which the Company resumes making full cash interest
payments.
Interest Rate Swap Arrangements.
Borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facility bear
interest at variable rates while our Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes bear interest at
fixed rates. The Company manages its exposure to changes in market interest rates by entering into
interest rate swaps. The Company is party to two interest rate swaps that became effective on June
29, 2007 and mature on December 31, 2012 for the purpose of fixing the variable rate of interest on
a portion of our outstanding term loan borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The
interest rate swaps carry initial notional principal amounts of $425.0 million (the USD Swap) and
300.0 million (the Euro Swap). Beginning on December 31, 2007, the notional value of the USD
Swap declines over its term in annual decrements of $25.0 million through December 29, 2011 and
carries a final notional principal amount of $160.0 million for the period from December 30, 2011
through December 30, 2012. Beginning on December 31, 2007, the notional value of the Euro Swap
declines over its term in annual decrements of
20.0 million through December 29, 2011 and carries
a final notional principal amount of
110.0 million for the period from December 30, 2011 through
December 30, 2012. Under the USD Swap and Euro Swap, the Company receives monthly interest at a
variable rate equal to one-month U.S. Libor and one-month Euribor, respectively, and pay monthly
interest at a fixed rate of 5.40% and 4.56%, respectively.
As of December 31, 2008, the Amended Swaps effectively convert $375.0 million of variable rate
U.S. dollar-denominated debt and
260.0 million ($361.9 million on a U.S. dollar equivalent basis)
of variable rate Euro-denominated debt to fixed rates of interest. The counterparty to our interest
rate swap agreements is a major financial institution. The Company actively monitors its asset or
liability position under the interest rate swap agreements and the credit ratings of the
counterparty, in an effort to understand and evaluate the risk of non-performance by the
counterparty.
The aggregate fair value of the interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2008 was a liability of
$49.9 million and is reflected in other long-term liabilities. During the year ended December 31,
2008, we recognized non-cash net unrealized losses on our Amended Swaps of $35.4 million,
respectively, as a component of interest expense. See Note 14 in Item 8 Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of our
interest rate swap arrangements.
Compensating Cash Balance.
Our foreign subsidiaries obtain their liquidity from our global
cash pooling arrangement or from formal or informal lines of credit offered by local banks. The
borrowings drawn by our foreign subsidiaries from local banks are limited in aggregate by certain
covenants contained within the Senior Secured Credit Facility, Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated
Notes. The borrowings available to our foreign subsidiaries under our global cash pooling
arrangement are limited in aggregate by the
amount of compensating cash balances supporting the global cash pooling arrangement. Our
compensating cash balance represents bank overdraft positions of subsidiaries participating in our
global cash pooling arrangement with a third-party bank. Due to the nature of these overdrafts, all
amounts have been classified within the short-term portion of debt at each period end. As of
December 31, 2008, our compensating cash balance was $100.7 million.
38
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are not involved in any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely
to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.
Critical Accounting Policies
See Note 2 included in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for a description of our significant accounting policies. The policies discussed
below are considered by management to be critical to an understanding of our consolidated financial
statements because their application places the most significant demands on managements judgment,
with financial reporting results relying on estimation about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain. Specific risks for these critical accounting policies are described in the
following paragraphs. For all of these policies, management cautions that future events rarely
develop exactly as forecast, and such estimates routinely require adjustment.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets.
We have significant amounts of goodwill and intangible assets
on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008. Goodwill primarily represents the excess
of acquisition costs over the fair value of net assets acquired in connection with the Merger. Our
intangible assets with finite useful lives primarily relate to customer relationships and are
amortized over their respective estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis. Our
indefinite-lived intangible assets relate to our trademarks and trade names.
We believe that accounting for goodwill and intangible assets represents a critical accounting
policy because of the significant judgments and estimates that must be made by management in order
to determine each assets useful life and to apply the impairment testing model required by U.S.
GAAP.
We reevaluate the estimated useful lives of our intangible assets annually. We determined that
our trademarks and trade names have indefinite lives because they do not have legal, regulatory,
contractual, competitive or economic limitations and are expected to contribute to the generation
of cash flows indefinitely.
Goodwill and other intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life are not amortized and
are tested at least annually for impairment or between the annual tests if an event or change in
circumstance occurs that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the asset below its
carrying amount. Other amortizable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever
indication of potential impairment exists.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment prior to goodwill or amortizable
intangible assets. An impairment charge is measured if the carrying value of an indefinite-lived
intangible asset exceeds its fair value. We evaluate the recoverability of our amortizable
intangible assets by comparing the carrying value to estimated undiscounted future cash flows
expected to be generated. If an amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired, the impairment
loss to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the assets carrying value exceeds its
fair value. The fair value of our intangible assets is determined using a discounted cash flow
approach.
Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the segment (or reporting unit) level. The
goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The first step (Step 1), used to identify
potential impairment, involves comparing the reporting units estimated fair value to its carrying
value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is
considered not to be impaired. If the
carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential
impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment. The second step
(Step 2) involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value of
goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill calculated in a business
combination. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill, there is
no impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an
impairment charge is recorded for the excess. Goodwill impairments cannot be reversed in subsequent
periods.
The Company estimates the fair value of each reporting unit using both the income approach
(which is a discounted cash flow technique) and market approach (which is a market multiple
technique). These valuation methods required management to make various assumptions, including, but
not limited to, assumptions related to future profitability and cash flows, discount rates and
control premiums. Our estimates are based upon historical trends, managements knowledge and
experience and overall economic factors, including projections of future earnings potential.
Determining
the fair value of a reporting unit or an intangible asset involves management judgment and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Developing discounted future cash flows
in applying the income approach requires us to evaluate our intermediate to longer-term strategies
for each reporting unit, including, but not limited to, estimates about revenue growth, operating
margins, capital requirements, inflation and working capital management. The development of
appropriate rates to discount the estimated future cash flows of each reporting unit requires the
selection of risk premiums, which can materially impact the present value of future cash flows.
Selection of an appropriate peer group under the market approach involves judgment and an
alternative selection of guideline companies could yield materially different market multiples. We
seek to minimize judgment in the selection of an acquisition control premium by referring to
historical control premiums observed in the marketplace. We believe the estimates and assumptions
used in the valuation methods are reasonable.
39
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we recognized aggregate impairment charges of $392.1
million, relating to the impairment of goodwill and intangible assets. The impairment charges were
recognized for each of the Companys segments ($202.1 million in North American Lab, $88.0 million
in European Lab and $102.0 million in Science Education). We believe that the impairment charges
recognized in our North American Lab and European Lab segments were primarily a result of macro
economic factors, while the charges recognized in our Science Education segment were due to a
mix of macro economic and industry-specific factors. We did not recognize any impairment charges
during 2007 or 2006. See Note 3 included in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on the impairment charges we recognized in
the fourth quarter of 2008.
Should
the future profitability and cash flows of our reporting units
significantly decline and/or discount
rates increase and/or market multiples at comparable companies further decline, additional impairment
charges to goodwill and/or long-lived assets may be required. As of December 31, 2008, and after recognition of the impairment charges, the consolidated carrying
value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill was
$703.0 million and $1,784.7 million, respectively.
An instantaneous 10.0% decline in the fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets, due
primarily to increases in discount rates, and an instantaneous 10.0% decline in the fair value of
each reporting unit, due to changes in projected cash flows, discount rates, control premiums
and/or market multiples, would have increased our pre-tax impairment charges
by approximately $320.0 million.
Interest
Rate Swap Valuations.
We apply the fair value provisions of Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
, to our interest rate swap
arrangements and also to our pension plan holdings, including certain
funds which primarily invest in interest rate swaps. We determine the
fair value of all of our direct and indirect interest rate swaps using a discounted cash flow model
based on the contractual terms of the instrument and using observable inputs such as interest
rates, counterparty credit spread and our own credit spread. The discounted cash flow model does
not involve significant management judgment and does not incorporate significant unobservable
inputs. Accordingly, we classify all of our direct and indirect interest rate swap valuations
within Level 2 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy. We consider our
interest rate swap valuations to be a critical accounting policy as
we do not apply hedge accounting on our direct interest rate swaps and therefor changes in
fair value are recognized as a component of income or loss each
period. We had no other material financial assets or
liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2008.
As of December 31, 2008, the incorporation of credit spreads into our discounted cash flow
model had the effect of lowering the fair value (liability) of our interest rate swap arrangements
by $10.0 million. As of December 31, 2008, a 100 basis point (or 1.00%) improvement (deterioration)
in our own credit spread would have had the impact of increasing (decreasing) our liability for
interest rate swaps by approximately $0.6 million. As of December 31, 2008, counterparty credit
spread did not have a material impact on the fair value of our interest rate swaps. See Note 14
included in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form
10-K for more information on our direct and indirect interest rate swaps.
Accounts Receivable and Reserves.
The carrying amount of trade accounts receivable reflects a
reserve representing our estimate of the amounts that will not be collected for losses due to
uncollectibility and for estimated sales returns and allowances. In addition to reviewing
delinquent accounts receivable, we consider many factors in estimating our reserve, including
historical data, experience, customer types, creditworthiness and economic trends. From time to
time, we may adjust our assumptions for anticipated changes in any of these or other factors
expected to affect collectibility. During 2008, bad debt expense was
$2.7 million.
Inventories.
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined
principally by the last-in, first-out method for the U.S. subsidiaries and the first-in, first-out
method for all other subsidiaries. We review our inventory realization based upon several factors,
including customer demand, supply of inventory, inventory levels, competitive activity and
technology changes and record reserves for obsolescence based upon those and other factors. From
time to time, we may adjust our assumptions for anticipated changes in any of these or other
factors.
Rebates from Suppliers.
We earn rebates from certain of our suppliers from the achievement of
certain sales growth and/or purchase volume thresholds. To the extent that rebates relate to
inventory on hand, the inventory cost is reduced to reflect the lower cost. During the course of
the year, estimates made concerning the achievement of these goals or milestones can vary from
quarter to quarter. Generally, a proportionally larger amount of rebates are earned in the fourth
quarter of each year. During 2008, vendor rebate income was $32.7 million.
40
Agreements with Customers.
We have agreements with several of our customers, which contain
provisions related to pricing, volume purchase incentives and other contractual provisions. During
the course of the year, estimates are made concerning customer contracts and changes in estimates
related to these contracts may vary from quarter to quarter and are recorded against net sales.
Product Liability.
We are subject to product liability and other claims in the ordinary
course of business. Our business involves a risk of product liability and other claims in the
ordinary course of business, and from time to time we are named as a defendant in cases as a result
of our distribution of laboratory and production supplies. While the impact on us of this
litigation has typically been immaterial, there can be no assurance that the impact of the pending
and any future claims will not be material to our business, financial condition and results of
operations in the future. Our estimates of potential liability are based on several factors,
including our historical experience in similar cases, legal venue and the merits of each individual
case.
Pension Plans.
We have defined benefit pension plans covering a significant number of
domestic and international employees. Accounting for these plans requires the use of assumptions,
including estimates on the expected long-term rate of return on assets, discount rates and the
average rate of increase in employee compensation. In order to make informed assumptions,
management consults with actuaries and reviews public market data and general economic information.
We periodically assess these assumptions based on market conditions, and if those conditions
change, our pension cost and pension obligation may be adjusted accordingly. See Note 12 included
in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
more information on our defined benefit pension plans.
Income Taxes.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax
purposes and net operating loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date. We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount
that is more likely than not to be realized.
The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more
likely than not to be sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount
that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are
reflected in the period in which a change in judgment occurs, as a result of information that
arises or when a tax position is effectively settled. Prior to the adoption of FIN 48, the Company
recognized the effect of income tax positions only if such positions were probable of being
sustained.
We must make assumptions, judgments and estimates to determine our current provision for
income taxes and also our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance to be
recorded against a deferred tax asset. Our assumptions, judgments and estimates take into account
current tax laws, our interpretation of current tax laws and possible outcomes of current and
future audits conducted by foreign and domestic tax authorities and estimates of the amount of
future taxable income, if any. Any of the assumptions, judgments and estimates could cause our
actual income tax obligations to differ from our estimates. See Note 11 included in Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more
information on income taxes.
Estimates and Other Accounting Policies.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Those
estimates and assumptions are based on managements best estimates and judgment. Management
evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other
factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable
under the circumstances. We adjust such estimates and assumptions when we believe relevant facts
and circumstances warrant an adjustment. Current adverse economic conditions, illiquid credit
markets, volatile equity and foreign currency markets, and declines in customer spending have
combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As future events
and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly
from those estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from continued changes in the economic
environment will be reflected in our consolidated financial statements in future periods.
41
New Accounting Standards
See Note 2 in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, for a complete description of new accounting standards, including those standards
adopted as of December 31, 2008 and to be adopted in future periods.
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
Our Senior Secured Credit Facility contains variable interest rates, which exposes the Company
to fluctuating rates of interest. In order to partially mitigate such potential variations in
interest rates, the Company has entered into certain interest rate swaps.
As of December 31, 2008, our two interest rate swaps effectively convert $375.0 million of
variable rate U.S. dollar-denominated debt and
260.0 million ($361.9 million on a U.S. dollar
equivalent basis) of variable rate Euro-denominated debt to fixed rates of interest.
As of December 31, 2008, an instantaneous 100 basis point (or 1.00%) change in the variable
rates for the Senior Secured Credit Facility would, on an annualized basis, impact interest expense
by approximately $7.7 million on a pre-tax basis and inclusive of our interest rate swaps. See
Indebtedness above for more information on our variable rate debt and our interest rate swap
arrangements.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
While we report our consolidated financial results in U.S. dollars, we derive a significant
portion of our sales and incur costs in foreign currencies (principally the Euro, the British pound
sterling and the Canadian dollar) from our operations outside the United States. Fluctuations in
the relative values of currencies occur from time to time and could favorably or unfavorably affect
our operating results. Specifically, during times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, our reported
international sales and earnings will be reduced because the local currency will translate into
fewer U.S. dollars. A 10.00% change in foreign currency exchange rates
relative to the U.S. dollar would have impacted our operating income by approximately $8.4 million.
Net sales and costs tend to be incurred in the same currency, and therefore, reduce local currency
risks.
As a result of a change in our capital structure related to the Merger, we have a significant
amount of foreign-denominated debt on our U.S. dollar-denominated balance sheet. An instantaneous
10.00% change in foreign currency exchange rates associated with foreign
denominated debt outstanding as of December 31, 2008 would have impacted our exchange gain or loss
by approximately $86.3 million on a pre-tax basis.
Where we deem it prudent, we have engaged in hedging programs, using primarily foreign
currency forward contracts, aimed at limiting the impact of foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations on cash flows and earnings. We may purchase short-term foreign currency forward
contracts to protect against currency exchange risks primarily associated with the payment of
merchandise purchases to foreign vendors or our international subsidiaries. Cash flows from
currency forward contracts accounted for as hedges are classified in the statement of cash flows in
the same category as the item being hedged. These activities have not been material to our
consolidated financial statements. See Note 14 in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for additional discussion of our hedging programs.
42
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The following consolidated financial statements and schedule of the Company for the periods
indicated are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The term Successor refers to the
Company after giving effect to the consummation of the Merger (as defined in Note 1) on June 29,
2007. The term Predecessor refers to the Company prior to giving effect to the consummation of
the Merger. As a result of the Merger, including changes in our capital structure and the effects
of purchase accounting, the Predecessor and Successor financial statements are not comparable. See
Note 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
43
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
VWR Funding, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VWR Funding, Inc. and subsidiaries
(Successor) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity and other comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and for the period from June 30, 2007 to December 31, 2007 (Successor
periods) and for the period from January 1, 2007 to June 29, 2007 and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (Predecessor periods). In connection with our audits of the consolidated
financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule for the Successor and
Predecessor periods as listed on the index on page 43. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the Successor consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of VWR Funding, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the
Successor periods, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Further, in
our opinion, the aforementioned Predecessor consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the results of operations and the cash flows of CDRV Investors, Inc. and its
subsidiaries for the Predecessor periods, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Also in our opinion, the related consolidated financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of VWR Funding, Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated
Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO),
and our report dated March 30, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective June 29, 2007, VWR
Funding, Inc. acquired all of the outstanding stock of CDRV Investors, Inc. in a business
combination accounted for as a purchase (the Merger). As a result of the Merger, the consolidated
financial information for the periods after the Merger are presented on a different cost basis than
that for the periods before the Merger and, therefore, are not comparable.
As discussed in Notes 2 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
, effective
January 1, 2008. As discussed in Notes 2 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes
, effective January 1, 2007.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 30, 2009
44
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
$
|
45.0
|
|
|
Compensating cash balance
|
|
|
100.7
|
|
|
|
87.4
|
|
|
Trade
accounts receivable, less reserves of $10.1 and $12.0, respectively
|
|
|
472.2
|
|
|
|
479.0
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
284.8
|
|
|
|
295.6
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
963.9
|
|
|
|
970.1
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
190.1
|
|
|
|
200.7
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,784.7
|
|
|
|
1,964.8
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
2,012.9
|
|
|
|
2,377.0
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
119.1
|
|
|
|
87.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,084.9
|
|
|
$
|
5,615.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, Redeemable Equity Units and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
165.0
|
|
|
$
|
89.8
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
356.5
|
|
|
|
385.2
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
189.8
|
|
|
|
187.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
711.3
|
|
|
|
662.6
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
2,650.6
|
|
|
|
2,707.6
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
121.5
|
|
|
|
104.1
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
546.7
|
|
|
|
690.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,030.1
|
|
|
|
4,164.8
|
|
|
Redeemable equity units
|
|
|
46.4
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
Commitments and contingences (Note 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized,
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,360.4
|
|
|
|
1,360.2
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(383.6
|
)
|
|
|
(49.0
|
)
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
96.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,008.4
|
|
|
|
1,407.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, redeemable equity units and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
5,084.9
|
|
|
$
|
5,615.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
45
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,759.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,822.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,699.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,257.6
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
2,693.8
|
|
|
|
1,311.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,230.1
|
|
|
|
2,374.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,065.4
|
|
|
|
511.4
|
|
|
|
|
469.2
|
|
|
|
883.3
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
861.6
|
|
|
|
408.5
|
|
|
|
|
371.3
|
|
|
|
692.3
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
392.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(188.3
|
)
|
|
|
102.9
|
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
191.0
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(289.6
|
)
|
|
|
(130.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(101.8
|
)
|
|
|
(117.1
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
(67.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(450.1
|
)
|
|
|
(91.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(33.9
|
)
|
|
|
79.1
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
|
|
115.5
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
(32.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(334.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
46.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
For the Period January 1, 2006 June 29, 2007 (Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value of
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
Treasury stock,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
restricted
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
stock issued
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
5,779,178
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
268.0
|
|
|
$
|
43.6
|
|
|
$
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
25,750
|
|
|
$
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
321.3
|
|
|
Equity reclassification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection
with our Predecessor stock plan
|
|
|
52,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
25,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
Tax benefit related to stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
Make whole option payment recorded as
a reduction to equity, net of $4.7 tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
Reduction of common stock purchase
subject to guarantee agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
Cash distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255.2
|
)
|
|
|
(88.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(343.5
|
)
|
|
Stock dividend
|
|
|
5,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,730
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.4
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of $4.9 tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of applying
SFAS 158, net of $1.5 tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
5,862,892
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
59,480
|
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
62.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection
with our Predecessor stock plan
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
5,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
Tax benefit related to stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 29, 2007
|
|
|
5,870,549
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
24.0
|
|
|
$
|
(23.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
75.5
|
|
|
|
66,680
|
|
|
$
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
70.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
47
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
For the Period June 30, 2007 December 31, 2008 (Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
deficit
|
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance at June 30, 2007
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to parent, net of expenses
and redeemable equity units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,354.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,354.9
|
|
|
Tax benefit related to transaction fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
Capital contributions from parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense associated with our
parent company equity plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
Reclassification of redeemable equity units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49.0
|
)
|
|
Realized loss on derivatives, net of $4.6 tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
Amortization of realized loss on derivatives, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives, net of $9.4 tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)
|
|
Minimum pension and postretirement liability, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117.3
|
|
|
|
117.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,360.2
|
|
|
|
(49.0
|
)
|
|
|
96.1
|
|
|
|
1,407.3
|
|
|
Capital contributions from parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense associated with our
parent company equity plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
Reclassification of redeemable equity units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(334.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(334.6
|
)
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives, net of $(5.5) tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
Amortization
of realized loss on derivatives, net of $(1.5) tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
Minimum
pension and postretirement asset, net of $(22.0) tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107.2
|
)
|
|
|
(107.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(399.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,360.4
|
|
|
$
|
(383.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
31.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,008.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
48
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(334.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
46.4
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
116.1
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
Net unrealized translation (gain) loss
|
|
|
(30.1
|
)
|
|
|
67.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
35.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
392.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash interest accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
Non-cash equity compensation expense
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
Amortization and write-off of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
(150.9
|
)
|
|
|
(60.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(15.7
|
)
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
Changes in working capital, net of business acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
(14.1
|
)
|
|
|
(27.3
|
)
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
Other current and non-current assets
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
(10.1
|
)
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(22.3
|
)
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
173.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger consideration, net of cash acquired of $135.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,802.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of businesses and other intangible assets
|
|
|
(54.2
|
)
|
|
|
(36.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(29.7
|
)
|
|
|
(16.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(15.7
|
)
|
|
|
(23.6
|
)
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(74.9
|
)
|
|
|
(3,854.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(32.9
|
)
|
|
|
(24.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
381.7
|
|
|
|
2,622.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
354.4
|
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(319.2
|
)
|
|
|
(33.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21.4
|
)
|
|
|
(106.1
|
)
|
|
Issuance of common stock to parent, net of expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,353.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in bank overdrafts
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(55.7
|
)
|
|
Net change in compensating cash balance
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
(43.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
Proceeds from equity and stock incentive plans
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(62.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(343.5
|
)
|
|
Acquisition of treasury stock and make-whole payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(10.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
3,877.9
|
|
|
|
|
(29.7
|
)
|
|
|
(139.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139.4
|
|
|
|
126.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
$
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
135.8
|
|
|
$
|
139.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
49
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(1) Background, Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
VWR Funding, Inc. (formerly CDRV Investors, Inc. (CDRV)) offers products and services
through its wholly-owned subsidiary, VWR International, LLC (VWR), and VWRs subsidiaries. We
distribute laboratory supplies, including chemicals, glassware, equipment, instruments, protective
clothing, production supplies and other assorted laboratory products, primarily in North America
and Europe. We also provide services, including technical services, on-site storeroom services and
laboratory and furniture design, supply and installation, which comprise only a small portion of
our net sales. Our business is diversified across products, geographic regions and customer
segments.
We report financial results on the basis of the following three business segments: North
American laboratory distribution (North American Lab), European laboratory distribution
(European Lab) and Science Education. Both the North American Lab and European Lab segments are
engaged in the distribution of supplies to customers in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical
device, chemical, technology, food processing and consumer products industries, as well as
governmental agencies, universities and research institutes, and environmental organizations.
Science Education is engaged in the assembly, manufacture and distribution of scientific supplies
and specialized kits principally to primary and secondary schools. Our operations in Asia Pacific
are engaged in regional commercial operations and support our North American Lab and European Lab
businesses. The results of our regional commercial operations in Asia Pacific are included in our
North American Lab segment.
Until April 2004, the Company was owned by Merck KGaA. On April 7, 2004, the Company was
acquired from Merck KGaA by affiliates of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc. (CD&R) (the CD&R
Acquisition). On June 29, 2007, the Company was acquired from CD&R by affiliates of Madison
Dearborn Partners, LLC (Madison Dearborn) pursuant to a merger (the Merger). The Company
changed its name to VWR Funding, Inc. in connection with the Merger. As used herein, the Company,
we, us, and our refer to VWR Funding, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries before and/or
after the Merger and the name change, as the context requires.
After giving effect to the Merger and related transactions, the Company became a direct,
wholly owned subsidiary of VWR Investors, Inc., a Delaware corporation (VWR Investors), which is
a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Varietal Distribution Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (Holdings). VWR Investors and Holdings
have no operations other than the ownership of the Company. Private equity funds managed by Madison Dearborn beneficially own
approximately 75% of our outstanding common stock through their ownership interests in Holdings.
As a result of the Merger, our assets and liabilities were adjusted to their estimated fair
values as of June 30, 2007. This resulted in a significant increase in the carrying value of our
identified intangible assets and goodwill. In addition, we revalued our pension obligations,
recorded significant deferred tax liabilities and certain deferred tax assets and we incurred
substantial additional indebtedness. The Merger, including the redemption of previous debt and the
payment of related fees and expenses, was financed by equity contributions of $1,425.0, the
issuance of $675.0 aggregate principal amount of 10.25%/11.25% unsecured senior notes due 2015 (Senior Notes),
the issuance of $353.3 and 125.0 million aggregate principal amount of 10.75% unsecured senior
subordinated notes due 2017 (Senior Subordinated Notes) and senior secured term loan borrowings
under a senior secured credit facility of $615.0 and 600.0 million (the Senior Secured Credit
Facility).
The Merger has been reflected as of June 30, 2007 and the consolidated financial statements
reflecting the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the results
of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the period from June 30
through December 31, 2007 (after giving effect to the consummation of the Merger) are designated as
Successor financial statements. The consolidated financial statements reflecting the results of
operations and cash flows of the Company through the close of business on June 29, 2007 (prior to
giving effect to the consummation of the Merger) are designated as Predecessor financial
statements.
50
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The below accounting policies are applicable to the Predecessor and Successor financial
statements unless otherwise noted.
(a) Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. For example, significant estimates and assumptions were
made in determining triggering events and in quantifying impairments of our assets (Note 3), the
fair value of our financial instruments (Note 14), the need for valuation allowances on deferred
taxes (Note 11) and the discount rates and expected return on plan assets (Note 12), among others.
Those estimates and assumptions are based on managements best estimates and judgment. Management
evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other
factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable
under the circumstances. We adjust such estimates and assumptions when we believe relevant facts
and circumstances warrant an adjustment. Current adverse economic conditions, illiquid credit
markets, volatile equity and foreign currency markets, and declines in customer spending have
combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As future events
and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly
from those estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from continued changes in the economic
environment will be reflected in our consolidated financial statements in future periods.
(b) Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of VWR Funding, Inc.
and its subsidiaries after elimination of all intercompany balances and transactions. The
consolidated financial statements exclude the accounts of Holdings and VWR Investors, but include
Holdings investment cost basis allocated to assets and liabilities acquired in the Merger.
(c) Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries, where the functional currency is the local
currency, are translated into U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates, and income and expenses
are translated using average exchange rates. Resulting translation adjustments are reported in
accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders equity. Foreign
currency transaction gains and losses are reported in other income (expense), net within our
statements of operations.
We have a significant amount of foreign-denominated debt on our U.S. dollar-denominated
balance sheet. The translation of foreign-denominated debt obligations on our U.S.
dollar-denominated balance sheet is reported in other income
(expense), net as a foreign currency
exchange gain or loss each period. As a result, our operating results are exposed to foreign
currency risk, principally with respect to the Euro. An instantaneous
10.00%
change in foreign currency exchange rates associated with foreign denominated debt outstanding as
of December 31, 2008 would have impacted our exchange gains or losses by approximately $86.3 on a
pre-tax basis.
Foreign currency exchange gains and losses included in other income (expense), net were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Exchange gains (losses), net
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
$
|
(67.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
(2.0
|
)
|
During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, we recorded foreign currency
exchange gains (losses) based primarily on changes in the value of the Euro, the British pound
sterling and the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar, as well as the Euro against the British
pound sterling during such time periods. Our net exchange gain for the year ended December 31, 2008
is substantially related to unrealized gains due to the weakening of the Euro against the U.S.
dollar. Our net exchange loss for the period from June 30 through December 31, 2007 is
substantially related to unrealized losses due to the strengthening of the Euro against the U.S.
dollar.
51
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of highly liquid investments with original maturities
of three months or less. Our cash equivalents consisted of overnight deposits with major banks and
overnight investments in money market funds. The amount of
restricted cash was $0.4 at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
While our global cash pooling arrangement is with a single financial institution with specific
provisions for the right to offset positive and negative cash balances, we believe it is unlikely
that we would offset an underlying cash deficit with a cash surplus from another country.
Accordingly, we classify a positive amount of cash, equal to our aggregate bank overdraft positions
of subsidiaries participating in our global cash pooling arrangement, as a compensating cash
balance separate from cash and cash equivalents. Due to the nature of bank overdraft positions, all
amounts have been classified within the short-term portion of debt at each period end.
(e) Trade Accounts Receivable
The carrying amount of trade accounts receivable reflects a reserve representing our estimate
of the amounts that will not be collected and for estimated sales returns and allowances. In
addition to reviewing delinquent accounts receivable, we consider many factors in estimating our
reserve, including historical data, experience, customer types, creditworthiness and economic
trends. From time to time, we may adjust our assumptions for anticipated changes in any of these or
other factors expected to affect collectability.
Trade accounts receivable reflects a diverse customer base and our wide geographic dispersion
of businesses. As a result, no significant concentrations of credit risk existed as of December 31,
2008 and 2007.
(f) Inventories
Inventories, consisting primarily of products held for sale, are valued at the lower of cost
or market, cost being determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for our
U.S. subsidiaries and the first-in, first-out method for all other subsidiaries. We periodically
review quantities of inventories on hand and compare these amounts to the expected use of each
product or product line. We record a charge to cost of goods sold for the amount required to reduce
the carrying value of inventory to net realizable value. The table below shows the percentage of
inventories determined using the LIFO method and the amount by which the LIFO cost is less than the
current cost for each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent using LIFO method
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
Amount less than current cost
|
|
$
|
6.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
(g) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Property and equipment held under capital leases
are stated at the present value of minimum lease payments. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method as follows: buildings and improvements ranges from 10 to 40 years; equipment
and software ranges from 3 to 15 years. Property and equipment held under capital leases and
leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated
useful lives of the assets or the estimated remaining life of the lease. Costs for repairs and
maintenance that do not significantly increase the value or estimated lives of property and
equipment are treated as expense as such costs are incurred.
(h) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets used in operations when events or changes
in circumstances indicate a possible inability to recover carrying amounts. The Company assesses
recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the asset to estimated undiscounted future cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset. If an asset is considered impaired, the impairment
loss to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the assets carrying value exceeds its
fair value.
52
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(i) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of net
assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized, but instead is reviewed for
impairment at least annually. Goodwill is tested annually or between annual tests if events occur
or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit
below its carrying amounts. We have elected to perform our annual goodwill impairment test on
October 1
st
of each year. Goodwill included in the consolidated financial statements
primarily represents the excess of acquisition costs over the fair value of net assets acquired in
connection with the Merger.
We determined that our trademarks and trade names have indefinite lives because they do not
have legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive or economic limitations and are expected to
contribute to the generation of cash flows indefinitely. Intangible assets with indefinite lives
are reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate a
possible impairment. Our intangible assets with finite useful lives primarily relate to customer
relationships and are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives on a straight-line
basis.
No impairment losses associated with goodwill and intangible assets were recorded in 2007 and
2006. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company recognized certain impairment charges. See
Note 3.
(j) Advertising
We expense advertising costs as incurred, except for certain direct-response advertising,
which is capitalized and amortized over its expected period of future benefit, generally between 12
to 48 months. Capitalized direct-response advertising, which is included in other current assets
and other assets, consists of catalog production and mailing costs that are expensed over the
estimated useful life from the date catalogs are mailed. Capitalized direct-response advertising as
of December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $7.4 and $6.5, respectively. The table below shows total
advertising expense, including amortization of capitalized direct-response advertising costs, for
each of the reporting periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising expense
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
21.5
|
|
(k) Revenue Recognition
We record product revenue on a gross basis when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
the price is fixed or determinable, title and risk of loss have been transferred to the customer
and collectibility of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Title and risk of loss is
transferred at the time of shipment or upon delivery to customers, depending upon the terms of the
arrangement with the customer. Products are delivered without significant post-sale obligations to
the customer. Provisions for discounts, rebates to customers, sales returns and other adjustments
are provided for as a reduction of sales in the period the related sales are recorded.
Our service revenues, which represent a small part of our business, are primarily comprised of
technical services, on-site storeroom services, laboratory and furniture design, supply and
installation. Revenues related to technical services and on-site storeroom services are recognized
as the services are performed. Certain of our arrangements to provide on-site storeroom services
contain multiple elements. We recognize revenue separately for each element based on the fair value
of the element provided. The majority of contracts associated with our laboratory and furniture
design, supply and installation are recorded under the percentage-of-completion method of
accounting. Profits recognized on contracts in process are based upon estimated contract revenue
and cost to completion. Cost to completion is measured based on actual costs incurred to date
compared to total estimated costs. Typically, the duration of such projects does not extend beyond
two months.
We record shipping and handling charges billed to customers in net sales and record shipping
and handling costs in cost of goods sold for all periods presented. Sales taxes collected from
customers and remitted to governmental authorities are accounted for on a net basis and therefore
are excluded from net sales.
53
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(l) Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the expected net tax effects of temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes and net
operating loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is
more likely than not to be realized.
The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more
likely than not to be sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount
that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are
reflected in the period in which a change in judgment occurs, as a result of information that
arises or when a tax position is effectively settled. Prior to January 1, 2007, the Company
recognized the effect of income tax positions only if such positions were probable of being
sustained.
(m) Insurance
We maintain corporate insurance programs with third parties in the areas of executive risk,
commercial property, business interruption and casualty. We also self-insure certain risks inherent
in our business which, taken together with the deductible levels and exclusions contained within
our third party programs, results in our recording of accruals for incurred claims. Our ultimate
exposure may be mitigated by amounts we expect to recover from third parties associated with such
claims.
(n) Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans
We have defined benefit plans covering certain of our employees. The benefits include pension,
salary continuance, life insurance and health care. Benefits are accrued over the employees
service period.
(o) Share-Based Compensation
The Company expenses the grant-date fair value of share-based awards over the vesting period
during which services are performed. Share-based compensation expense that has been included in
selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses
amounted to $3.8, $2.7, $9.0 and $4.6 for the year ended
December 31, 2008, for the period from June 30 through December 31, 2007,
for the period from January 1 through June 29, 2007 and for the
year ended December 31, 2006, respectively.
(p) Financial Instruments and Derivatives
All derivatives, whether designated for hedging relationships or not, are recorded on the
balance sheet at fair value. For all hedging relationships the Company formally documents the
hedging relationship and its risk-management objective and strategy, the hedged instrument, the
hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the hedging instruments effectiveness will
be assessed prospectively and retrospectively, and a description of the method of measuring
ineffectiveness. If the derivative is designated as a fair value hedge, the changes in the fair
value of the derivative and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in
the results of operations. If the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective
portions of changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and are recognized in the results of operations when the hedged item
affects earnings. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges are
recognized in the results of operations. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging
instruments, changes in fair value are recognized in the results of operations in the current
period.
We regularly enter into foreign currency forward contracts primarily to hedge exposures to
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that arise from purchasing of products that are
denominated in foreign currencies. Gains and losses on the foreign currency forward contracts
generally offset gains and losses on certain expected commitments. To the extent these foreign
currency forward contracts are considered effective hedges, gains and losses on these positions are
deferred and included in the basis of the transaction when it is completed. Cash flows from foreign
currency forward contracts accounted for as hedges are classified in the statement of cash flows in
the same category as the item being hedged or on a basis consistent with the nature of the
instrument.
We also have entered into certain interest rate swap arrangements (see Note 14). Cash flows
from our interest rate swaps are classified in the statement of cash flows within operating
activities consistent with the classification of interest.
54
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(q) Investments
Prior to April 2007, we had a 24% investment in KMF Laborchemie Handels GmbH (KMF), which
was accounted for using the equity method. On April 2, 2007, we acquired the remaining 76% interest
in KMF and discontinued equity method treatment, as KMF became a consolidated subsidiary. Equity
income, included in other income (expense), net for the period from January 1 through June 29, 2007
and for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $0.4 and $0.5, respectively.
(r) Asset Retirement Obligations
The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation is recognized in the period
when the asset is placed in service. The fair value of the liability is estimated using discounted
cash flows. In subsequent periods, the retirement obligation is accreted to its future value or the
estimate of the obligation at the asset retirement date. The accretion charge is reflected as a
component of SG&A expenses. A corresponding retirement asset equal to the fair value of the
retirement obligation is also recorded as part of the carrying amount of the related long-lived
asset and depreciated over the assets useful life. Our conditional asset retirement obligations
primarily relate to restoration costs for leased facilities, including the removal of certain
leasehold improvements. Costs related to our asset retirement obligations are not material.
(s) Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss) components include foreign currency translation adjustments,
pension and other postretirement benefit liability adjustments, realized and unrealized gains
(losses) on derivatives and amortization of realized gains (losses) on derivatives. We report
comprehensive income (loss) in our consolidated statements of stockholders equity and other
comprehensive income (loss).
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
$
|
117.3
|
|
|
Realized loss on derivatives, net of taxes of $8.1 and $4.2
|
|
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
Unrealized
gain (loss) on derivatives, net of taxes of
$(1.6) and $9.4
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)
|
|
Retirement benefit plans, net of taxes of $(21.5) and $0.5
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31.6
|
|
|
$
|
96.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(t) Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
242.8
|
|
|
$
|
89.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
51.8
|
|
|
$
|
77.4
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
(u) New Accounting Standards
The following accounting standards were adopted during 2008:
During September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157). In February
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2, providing a one-year deferral of SFAS
157s fair value measurement requirements for non-financial assets and liabilities that
are not required or permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. We adopted
SFAS 157 with respect to certain financial instruments on January 1, 2008. We are currently
evaluating the impact SFAS 157 will have on our non-financial assets and liabilities that are not
required or permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. See Note 14 for more
information on our adoption of SFAS 157.
55
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
During February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(SFAS 159). SFAS 159
permits entities to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value
with an objective to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to
mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities
differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 was effective for
the Company beginning January 1, 2008. During 2008, we did not elect the fair value option for
eligible items; therefore, the adoption of SFAS 159 had no impact on the Company. However, SFAS 159
allows us to make the fair value election, on an instrument-by-instrument basis, in future periods.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3 (FAS 157-3) to clarify and illustrate the
application of SFAS 157 to an inactive market. The guidance in FAS 157-3 was effective immediately.
We adopted FAS 157-3 as of September 30, 2008 and considered its guidance in preparing our
consolidated financial statements and it had no impact.
The following accounting standards will be adopted in the future:
During December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R replaces SFAS No. 141, but retains its fundamental requirements. SFAS 141R
is expected to change our application of the acquisition method in a number of respects. SFAS 141R
will require that: (1) all assets and liabilities of an acquired business, including goodwill,
generally be recorded at fair value; (2) contingent consideration be recognized at its fair value
on the acquisition date and, for certain arrangements, changes in fair value be recognized in
earnings until settled; (3) acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs be expensed and
(4) when making adjustments to finalize initial accounting, any previously issued post-acquisition
financial information in future financial statements be revised to reflect adjustments as if they
had been recorded on the acquisition date. We will apply SFAS 141R to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
January 1, 2009 and accounting for valuation allowances on
deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies for prior business
combinations. The impact of our
adoption of SFAS 141R will depend on the magnitude of acquisition activities occurring subsequent
to January 1, 2009.
During December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 amends ARB 51,
Consolidated
Financial Statements
, to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 clarifies that a
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that
should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 will become
effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. As of December 31, 2008, we do not have any
noncontrolling or minority interests; therefore, the adoption of SFAS 160 will have no
impact on our financial position or results of operations.
During March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities
(SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires entities to provide enhanced disclosures about
how and why derivative instruments are used, how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
and its related interpretations, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect
financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 will become effective for the
Company on January 1, 2009. We expect the adoption of SFAS 161
will affect disclosures but will have
no impact on our financial position or results of operations.
During April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets
(FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 requires entities, upon estimating the useful lives of
recognized intangible assets, to consider historical experience in renewing or extending similar
arrangements or, in the absence of historical experience, to consider assumptions that
market-participants would use about renewal or extension. Market-participant assumptions used in
the application of FSP 142-3 should be consistent with the concept of highest and best use of the
asset. FSP 142-3 enhances certain disclosure requirements of SFAS 142. FSP 142-3 will become
effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. Early adoption is prohibited. We are currently
evaluating the impact FSP 142-3 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
During December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1,
Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets
(FSP 132R-1) to provide increased disclosure around plan
assets similar to the disclosure principles of SFAS 157. FSP 132R-1 will
require disclosure of: (1) how investment allocation decisions are made, including investment
policies and strategies; (2) the fair value of each major category of plan assets, categories being
determined based on the nature and risk of plan assets; (3) the inputs and valuation techniques
used to develop fair value measurements, including measurements using significant unobservable
inputs and (4) significant concentrations of risk in plan assets. FSP 132R-1 will become effective
for the Companys disclosures as of December 31, 2009. We expect the adoption of FSP 132R-1 will
affect disclosures but will have no impact on our financial position or results of operations.
56
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(v) Reclassifications
Certain amounts from prior periods presented in the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
(3) Impairment
As a result of the Merger, and to a lesser extent due to acquisitions completed subsequent to
the Merger, we carry significant amounts of goodwill and intangible assets, including
indefinite-lived intangible assets, on our balance sheet.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company conducted the required annual test of goodwill
for impairment as of October 1, 2008. There was no indicated impairment for our North American Lab
and European Lab reporting units, as the estimated fair value exceeded its corresponding book
value. However, as a result of a decline in operating results in our Science Education reporting
unit and due to a decline in forecasted cash flows, we recognized an impairment of goodwill and
intangible assets of $99.0.
As of December 31, 2008, based on an adverse change in the general business climate as a
result of the global economic slowdown, the Company determined an impairment test was
required for all reporting units, including tests of long-lived assets, indefinite-lived intangible
assets and goodwill. As a result of our impairment tests, we recognized aggregate
impairment charges of $293.1, relating to the impairment of goodwill and intangible assets. We
believe that the impairment charges recognized in our North American Lab and European Lab
reporting units were primarily a result of macro economic factors, while the charges recognized in
our Science Education reporting unit were due to a mix of macro
economic and industry-specific factors.
These impairment charges reduced the carrying value of our reporting units during the fourth
quarter of 2008 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
European
|
|
|
Science
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Lab
|
|
|
Lab
|
|
|
Education
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Asset category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
|
|
$
|
106.6
|
|
|
$
|
88.0
|
|
|
$
|
39.0
|
|
|
$
|
233.6
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
95.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.0
|
|
|
|
158.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment charges
|
|
$
|
202.1
|
|
|
$
|
88.0
|
|
|
$
|
102.0
|
|
|
$
|
392.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To determine each of the impairment charges noted above, the Company estimated the
fair value of each reporting unit using both the income approach (which is a discounted cash flow
technique) and market approach (which is a market multiple technique). These valuation methods
required management of the Company to make various assumptions, including, but not limited to,
assumptions related to future profitability and cash flows, discount rates and control premiums. We
believe the estimates and assumptions used in the valuation methods are reasonable. Should the
future profitability and cash flows of our reporting units decline and/or discount rates increase
and/or market multiples at comparable companies further decline, additional impairment charges to goodwill
and/or long-lived assets may be required. As of December 31, 2008, and after recognition of the impairment charges, the consolidated carrying
value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill was $703.0 and $1,784.7, respectively.
An instantaneous 10.0% decline in the fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets, due
primarily to increases in discount rates, and an instantaneous 10.0% decline in the fair value of
each reporting unit, due to changes in projected cash flows, discount rates, control premiums
and/or market multiples, would have increased our pre-tax impairment charges
by approximately $320.0.
57
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(4) Business Combinations and Acquisitions
(a) The Merger
The Merger was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The following table
summarizes the allocation of the purchase price as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger consideration, including transaction costs of $108.8
|
|
$
|
4,002.0
|
|
|
Net current assets
|
|
|
(986.0
|
)
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(188.3
|
)
|
|
Intangible assets acquired
|
|
|
(2,331.9
|
)
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(26.3
|
)
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
595.1
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
83.9
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
783.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
1,932.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger consideration in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the period June
30 through December 31, 2007 of $3,802.9 excludes cash and cash equivalents acquired of $135.8,
management equity in the Predecessor of $35.6 exchanged for equity in Holdings and payments made in
July 2007 related to the repayment of debt and interest of $25.7 and other liabilities of $2.0.
Included in Merger consideration are pre-payment penalties and tender offer premiums of $93.0
related to debt obligations of the Company that were redeemed in
connection with the Merger. See Note 5 for adjustments to Merger
allocation during 2008.
(b) Successor Acquisitions
Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 and during the period from June
30 through December 31, 2007 includes the effects of certain business combinations and acquisitions
noted below:
|
|
|
|
On July 2, 2007, we acquired Bie & Berntsen A-S (B&B), a Danish scientific laboratory
supply distributor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 1, 2007, we acquired Omnilabo International B.V. (Omnilabo BV), a
Netherlands-based scientific laboratory supply distributor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On April 1, 2008, we acquired Jencons (Scientific) Limited (Jencons), a scientific
laboratory supply distributor. Based in the UK, Jencons also has operations in Ireland,
Kenya and the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 1, 2008, we acquired Spektrum-3d Kft (Spektrum), a Hungarian-based scientific
laboratory supply distributor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On October 1, 2008, we acquired Omnilab AG (Omnilab), a Swiss scientific laboratory
supply distributor.
|
The results of B&B, Omnilabo BV, Jencons, Spektrum and Omnilab (collectively, the Successor
Acquisitions) have been included in the European Lab segment
from the dates of acquisition. The Successor Acquisitions were funded through a combination of cash and cash
equivalents on hand and incremental borrowings made under the Companys Senior Secured Credit
Facility. The accumulated excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the acquired net
assets of the Successor Acquisitions is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price, including transaction costs
|
|
$
|
90.3
|
|
|
Net tangible assets acquired
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
Intangible assets acquired
|
|
|
(27.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
purchase accounting adjustments of Spektrum and Omnilab as of
December 31, 2008 are preliminary, as there is not sufficient
information to make a final allocation.
58
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(c) Predecessor Acquisition
We had a 24% investment in KMF, which was accounted for using the equity method. On April 2,
2007, we acquired the remaining 76% interest in KMF. The purchase price was funded from cash and
cash equivalents on hand. KMF is a German-based scientific laboratory supply distribution firm that
offers highly diversified chemicals and consumable products to the laboratory industry in Germany.
The results of KMF have been included in the European Lab segment from the date of acquisition on a
consolidated basis.
(d) Pro-Forma Financial Information
The following unaudited pro-forma financial information presents a summary of consolidated
results of operations of the Company as if the Merger, the acquisition of KMF and the Successor
Acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,787.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,626.2
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(447.4
|
)
|
|
|
(197.6
|
)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(332.6
|
)
|
|
|
(122.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the mathematical sum of the 2007 Predecessor (January
1 through June 29, 2007) and Successor (June 30 through
December 31, 2007) periods, including pro-forma adjustments.
|
These pro-forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and primarily include
pro-forma adjustments for interest expense including non-cash amortization of deferred financing
costs, depreciation, amortization and income taxes. The pro-forma results also include an
adjustment to remove the effect of the Companys accounting for KMF as an equity method investment
prior to April 1, 2007. The pro-forma results assume interest rates in effect as of December 31,
2008 and further that certain effective interest rate swaps were established as of January 1, 2007,
in the same notional amounts and with identical terms as the actual interest rate swaps entered
into upon the Merger. These results do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations
which actually would have resulted had the Merger, the acquisition of KMF and the Successor
Acquisitions occurred at the beginning of 2007, or of the future results of operations of the
Company.
59
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(5) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following tables reflect changes in the carrying value of goodwill by segment from
January 1, 2007 through June 29, 2007 (prior to the Merger) and from June 30 through December 31,
2008 (subsequent to the Merger):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
European
|
|
|
Science
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Lab
|
|
|
Lab
|
|
|
Education
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Predecessor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
648.6
|
|
|
$
|
216.8
|
|
|
$
|
67.7
|
|
|
$
|
933.1
|
|
|
Adjustment related to adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
Initial KMF allocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
Currency translation changes
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
662.9
|
|
|
$
|
251.7
|
|
|
$
|
67.8
|
|
|
$
|
982.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,009.1
|
|
|
$
|
744.0
|
|
|
$
|
143.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,897.0
|
|
|
Adjustments to Merger allocation
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
(44.3
|
)
|
|
|
(31.8
|
)
|
|
Restructuring charges, net of tax
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
Adjustments to previous restructuring, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
Successor Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
Currency translation changes
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,022.2
|
|
|
|
843.0
|
|
|
|
99.6
|
|
|
|
1,964.8
|
|
|
Adjustments to Merger allocation
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
Successor Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment charges (Note 3)
|
|
|
(95.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63.0
|
)
|
|
|
(158.5
|
)
|
|
Currency translation changes
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)
|
|
|
(46.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
915.7
|
|
|
$
|
832.5
|
|
|
$
|
36.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,784.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net for each of the reporting periods is shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Period (Years)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships in North America (net of
accumulated amortization of $55.5 and $18.8)
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
$
|
685.4
|
|
|
$
|
736.5
|
|
|
Customer relationships in Europe (net of accumulated
amortization of $36.3 and $12.4)
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
446.4
|
|
|
|
480.3
|
|
|
Customer relationships in Science Education (net of
accumulated amortization of $9.8 and $3.3)
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
121.2
|
|
|
|
127.7
|
|
|
Chemical supply agreement (net of accumulated amortization
of $11.9 and $4.2)
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
Other (net of accumulated amortization of $5.0 and $1.5)
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable intangible assets (net of accumulated
amortization of $118.5 and $40.2)
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
1,309.9
|
|
|
|
1,413.2
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and tradenames (Note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703.0
|
|
|
|
963.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,012.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,377.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
Amortization expense for each of the reporting periods is shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
$
|
82.4
|
|
|
$
|
39.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.8
|
|
|
$
|
15.5
|
|
The estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years and thereafter is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
79.5
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
79.2
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
78.3
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
77.6
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
77.5
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
917.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,309.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) Restructuring
The Company has undertaken restructuring activities at acquired businesses. In addition, and
from time to time, the Company has undertaken restructuring activities outside the context of an
acquisition. Restructuring activities typically include severance and facility closure costs.
Restructuring expenses recognized in our statements of operations during 2008, 2007 and 2006 were
not material. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, $6.7 and $7.4, respectively, of our aggregate
restructuring liabilities are included in accrued expenses and $1.1 and $3.8, respectively, are
included in other long-term liabilities.
Upon our adoption of SFAS 141(R) on January 1, 2009, restructuring activities associated with
future acquired businesses, if any, will no longer qualify for purchase accounting and will be
expensed. See Note 2.
(7) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, net, for each of the reporting periods is shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
16.8
|
|
|
$
|
17.0
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
102.1
|
|
|
|
101.5
|
|
|
Equipment and computer software
|
|
|
106.9
|
|
|
|
83.4
|
|
|
Capital additions in process
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233.9
|
|
|
|
214.4
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(43.8
|
)
|
|
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
190.1
|
|
|
$
|
200.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
Depreciation expense for each of the reporting periods is shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
$
|
33.7
|
|
|
$
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
$
|
25.9
|
|
(8) Accounts Payable
The Company maintains a centralized cash management system for certain U.S. accounts payable
functions. Included in accounts payable at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are $6.1 and $4.6,
respectively, of uncleared payments.
(9) Accrued Expenses
The components of accrued expenses for each of the reporting periods is shown in the table
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
66.4
|
|
|
$
|
66.2
|
|
|
Employee-related accruals
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
Restructuring-related accruals
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
189.8
|
|
|
$
|
187.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) Debt
The following is a summary of our debt obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
1,504.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,491.2
|
|
|
Senior Notes
|
|
|
675.0
|
|
|
|
675.0
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
527.3
|
|
|
|
535.8
|
|
|
Compensating cash balance
|
|
|
100.7
|
|
|
|
87.4
|
|
|
Predecessor Senior Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
Other debt
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
2,815.6
|
|
|
|
2,797.4
|
|
|
Less short-term portion
|
|
|
(165.0
|
)
|
|
|
(89.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long term-portion
|
|
$
|
2,650.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,707.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
The following table summarizes the principal maturities of our debt as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility term loans
|
|
$
|
7.2
|
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,384.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,450.1
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility revolving facility
|
|
|
54.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.7
|
|
|
Senior Notes due 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675.0
|
|
|
|
675.0
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527.3
|
|
|
|
527.3
|
|
|
Compensating cash balance
|
|
|
100.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.7
|
|
|
Predecessor Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
Other debt
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
165.0
|
|
|
$
|
15.6
|
|
|
$
|
15.6
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
15.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,588.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,815.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Senior Secured Credit Facility
Our Senior Secured Credit Facility is with a syndicate of lenders and provides for aggregate
maximum borrowings consisting of (1) term loans denominated in Euros in an aggregate principal
amount currently outstanding of 600.0 million ($835.1 on a U.S. dollar equivalent basis as of
December 31, 2008), (2) term loans denominated in U.S. dollars in an aggregate principal amount
currently outstanding of $615.0 and (3) a multi-currency revolving loan facility, providing for an
equivalent in U.S. dollars of up to $250.0 in multi-currency revolving loans (inclusive of
swingline loans of up to $25.0 and letters of credit of up to $70.0). The multi-currency revolving
loan facility permits one or more of our foreign subsidiaries to become foreign borrowers under
such facility upon the satisfaction of certain conditions.
Subject to the Companys continued compliance with its covenants, the Company may at any time
or from time to time request additional tranches of term loans or increases in the amount of
commitments under the its Senior Secured Credit Facility. The terms and conditions of any such
incremental new term loans or incremental new revolving credit commitments must be mutually
agreeable to the Company and existing and any new lenders. Additionally, the total amount
outstanding under any incremental new tranches of term loans or incremental new revolving credit
commitments may not exceed in aggregate the lesser of $300.0 or an amount which would cause the
Company to exceed certain ratios. To present, the Company has not requested any such incremental
term loans or credit commitments. Based on current credit market conditions, we do not believe we would be
able to obtain any such incremental term loans or commitments in the near term.
As of December 31, 2008, an aggregate U.S. dollar equivalent of $54.7 was outstanding under
the multi-currency revolving loan facility, consisting of $13.5 in swingline loans and £16.5
million ($24.2 on a U.S. dollar equivalent basis) and $17.0 of revolving loans. In addition, we had
$11.7 of undrawn letters of credit outstanding. As of December 31, 2008, we had $183.6 of available
borrowing capacity under the multi-currency revolving loan facility.
Maturity; Prepayments
The
term loans will mature on June 30, 2014 and the multi-currency
revolving loan facility will mature on June 30, 2013.
Subject to any mandatory or optional prepayments, the principal amounts of the term loans require
quarterly amortization payments commencing on September 30, 2009 equal to 0.25% of their respective
original principal amounts drawn, with the final amortization
payments due at maturity. The Company is not required to make a
principal repayment on its outstanding term loans based on the Companys
excess cash flow (as defined under the Senior Secured
Credit Facility) calculation applicable to the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Security; Guarantees
The obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are guaranteed by VWR Investors, the
Company and each of the Companys wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries other than its U.S. foreign
subsidiary holding companies (collectively, the Subsidiary Guarantors). In addition, the Senior
Secured Credit Facility and the guarantees thereunder are secured by (1) security interests in and
pledges of or liens on substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of VWR Investors,
the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantors and (2) pledges of 100% of the capital stock of each of
the Subsidiary Guarantors and 65% of the capital stock of each of its U.S foreign subsidiary
holding companies.
63
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
Interest
At our election, the interest rates on all U.S. dollar loans, other than swingline loans, may
generally be based on either (1) the then applicable British Bankers Association London Interbank
Offered Rate (commonly known as U.S. Libor) plus a variable margin, or (2) the then applicable
alternate base rate (defined as the greater of the U.S. Prime lending rate or the Federal Funds
effective rate plus 0.5%) plus a variable margin. Swingline loans shall be denominated only in U.S.
dollars and based on the alternate base rate plus a variable margin. All loans denominated in
Canadian dollars may generally be based on either (1) the then applicable Canadian prime interest
rate plus a variable margin, or (2) the then applicable average offered interest rate for Canadian
bankers acceptances plus a variable margin. All loans denominated in Euros shall generally be
based on the then applicable interest rate determined by the Banking Federation of the European
Union (commonly known as the Euribor rate) plus a variable margin. All loans denominated in
currencies other than U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars and Euros shall generally be based on the then
applicable London Interbank Offered Rate for each respective loan and currency of denomination plus
a variable margin.
As of December 31, 2008, the interest rates on the U.S. dollar-denominated and
Euro-denominated term loans were 2.96% and 5.19%, respectively, which include a variable margin of
2.5%. Amounts drawn under the multi-currency revolving loan facility bear interest at a weighted
average rate of 4.40%. As of December 31, 2008, there were no loans under our Senior Secured Credit
Facility denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, Euro and British pound sterling. See
Note 14 for related interest rate swap arrangements.
Fees
The Company pays quarterly fees with respect to the Senior Secured Credit Facility, including
(1) a commitment fee equal to 0.50% per year on the unused portion of the multi-currency revolving
loan facility (subject to two step downs if certain net leverage ratios are met), and (2) letter of
credit fees consisting of a participation fee (equal to the then applicable Eurodollar variable
margin on the multi-currency revolving loan facility times any outstanding letters of credit), a
fronting fee (equal to 0.125% on the outstanding undrawn letters of credit paid to the issuing
bank) and administrative fees.
(b) The Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes
Ranking
The Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes, and related guarantees, are unsecured
obligations of the Company and are subordinate to all of the Companys and the Subsidiary
Guarantors obligations under all secured indebtedness, including any borrowings under the Senior
Secured Credit Facility to the extent of the value of the assets securing such obligations, and are
effectively subordinate to all obligations of each of the Companys subsidiaries that is not a
guarantor of the Senior Notes or the Senior Subordinated Notes (as the case may be). The Senior
Notes, and related guarantees, rank senior in right of payment to all of the Companys and the
Subsidiary Guarantors existing and future subordinated indebtedness, including the Senior
Subordinated Notes.
Maturity; Interest Payments
The
Senior Notes, which amount to $675.0 as of December 31, 2008, will mature on July 15,
2015. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable twice a year, on each January 15 and July 15. Until
July 15, 2011, the Company may elect to pay interest on the Senior Notes (1) entirely in cash
(Cash Interest), (2) entirely by increasing the principal amount of the Senior Notes (PIK
Interest) or (3) 50% as Cash Interest and 50% as PIK Interest. PIK Interest will accrue on the
Senior Notes at a rate per annum equal to the cash interest rate of 10.25% plus 100 basis points.
To date, the Company has paid only Cash Interest, including on January 15, 2009.
The Senior Subordinated Notes are denominated in Euros in an aggregate principal amount
currently outstanding of 125.0 million ($174.0 on a U.S. dollar equivalent basis as of December
31, 2008) and in U.S. dollars in an aggregate principal amount currently outstanding of $353.3. The
Senior Subordinated Notes will mature on June 30, 2017. Interest on the Senior Subordinated Notes
is payable quarterly on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year, beginning on
September 30, 2007. On any interest payment date on or prior to the third anniversary of the
issuance of the Senior Subordinated Notes (June 2010), the Company will have the option to
capitalize up to approximately 28% per annum of the interest payable on such date by capitalizing
such interest and adding it to the then outstanding principal amount of the Senior Subordinated
Notes.
If the
Company makes an election to pay PIK interest under either the Senior Notes or Senior
Subordinated Notes, it shall become subject to additional restrictions on certain
payments and certain investments beginning on such election date and ending on the first
date after such interest period on which the Company resumes making full cash interest
payments.
64
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
Guarantees
The obligations under the Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes are guaranteed, jointly
and severally and fully and unconditionally, on an unsubordinated basis by each of the Subsidiary
Guarantors. The Subsidiary Guarantors obligations under the guarantees of the Senior Notes and
Senior Subordinated Notes are not secured by any of the Companys assets or the Subsidiary
Guarantors assets.
Redemption
The Company may redeem some or all of the Senior Notes at any time prior to July 15, 2011 at a
price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
redemption, plus a make whole premium. Before July 15, 2011, the Company may redeem up to 35% of
the original aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 110.250%
of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued interest, with the net cash proceeds of certain
equity offerings. In addition, on or after July 15, 2011, the Company may redeem some or all of the
Senior Notes at any time at redemption prices that start at 105.125% of their aggregate principal
amount. The Company is required to offer to purchase the Senior Notes at 101% of their aggregate
principal amount, plus accrued interest to the repurchase date, if it experiences specific kinds of
changes in control.
The Company may redeem some or all of the Senior Subordinated Notes at any time prior to June
30, 2012 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to
the date of redemption, plus a make whole premium. Before June 30, 2012, the Company may redeem
up to 40% of the original aggregate principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes at a
redemption price equal to 110.750% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued interest, with
the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings. In addition, on or after June 30, 2012, the
Company may redeem some or all of the Senior Subordinated Notes at any time at redemption prices
that start at 105.375% of their aggregate principal amount. The Company is required to offer to
purchase the Senior Subordinated Notes at 101% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued
interest to the repurchase date, if it experiences specific kinds of changes in control.
Registration Rights
The Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with respect to the Senior Notes (the
Senior Notes Registration Rights Agreement). The Company satisfied its obligations under the
Senior Notes Registration Rights Agreement, and in February 2008, it completed the exchange offer
pursuant to which 100% of the outstanding Senior Notes were exchanged for new Senior Notes
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and with the same terms.
The Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with respect to the Senior
Subordinated Notes (the Subordinated Notes Registration Rights Agreement). Under the Subordinated
Notes Registration Rights Agreement, the Company is obligated, upon the request of holders of a
majority in principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes, to (1) file and cause to become
effective a registration statement with respect to an offer to exchange the Senior Subordinated
Notes for other freely tradable notes that have substantially identical terms, or (2) file with the
SEC and cause to become effective a shelf registration statement relating to the resales of the
Senior Subordinated Notes if the Company is not able to effect the exchange offer. The Company is
obligated to pay additional interest on the Senior Subordinated Notes in certain instances,
including if we do not file the registration statement within 90 days following a request or
completed the related exchange offer within 30 days of the effective date of the registration
statement. If the Company fails to satisfy certain of the registration obligations under the
Subordinated Notes Registration Rights Agreement, it will be subject to a registration default and
the annual interest on the Senior Subordinated Notes will increase by 0.25% and by an additional
0.25% for each subsequent 90-day period during which the registration default continued, up to a
maximum additional interest rate of 1.0% per annum. If we determine a registration payment
arrangement is probable and can be reasonably estimated, a liability will be recorded. As of
December 31, 2008, we concluded the likelihood of having to make any payments under the
arrangements was remote, and therefore did not record a contingent liability.
65
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(c) Covenant Compliance
The Senior Secured Credit Facility does not contain any financial maintenance covenants that
require the Company to comply with specified financial ratios or tests, such as a minimum interest
expense coverage ratio or a maximum leverage ratio, unless the Company wishes to incur additional
indebtedness associated with acquisitions or make certain restricted payments.
The indentures governing the Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes contain covenants
that, among other things, limit the Companys ability and that of its restricted subsidiaries to
make restricted payments, pay dividends, incur or create additional
indebtedness, issue certain types of common and preferred stock, make certain dispositions
outside the ordinary course of business, execute certain affiliate transactions, create liens on
assets of the Company and restricted subsidiaries, and materially change our lines of business.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with the covenants under the Senior
Secured Credit Facility and with the indentures and related requirements governing the Senior Notes
and Senior Subordinated Notes.
(d) Compensating Cash Balance
Our compensating cash balance represents bank overdraft positions of subsidiaries
participating in our global cash pooling arrangement with a third-party bank. Due to the nature of
these overdrafts, all amounts have been classified within the short-term portion of debt at each
period end.
(e) Other
The Company entered into a bridge loan commitment arrangement to secure funding for the
Merger. This bridge loan facility was not utilized because the Company issued the Senior Notes. The
bridge loan fee of $3.4 was paid at closing and recorded to interest expense in the Successor
financial statements as of June 30, 2007.
Substantially all of the debt obligations of the Company outstanding prior to the consummation
of the Merger were repaid or redeemed through the tender offers and redemptions as of the Merger.
As of December 31, 2008, $1.0 of 8% unsecured senior subordinated notes due 2014 (Predecessor
Senior Subordinated Notes) remain outstanding. Effective on the closing date of the Merger, the
indenture relating to the Predecessor Senior Subordinated Notes was amended pursuant to a
supplemental indenture, which eliminated substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain
events of default and related provisions in the indenture.
66
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(11) Income Taxes
(a) Income Tax Benefit (Provision)
The components of (loss) income before benefit (provision) for income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
(406.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(124.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(54.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
19.0
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(44.0
|
)
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
60.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(450.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(91.7
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(33.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
79.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the benefit (provision) for income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(35.9
|
)
|
|
|
(17.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
|
(22.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.4
|
)
|
|
|
(17.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
|
(27.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
88.3
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
State
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
43.1
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150.9
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax benefit (provision)
|
|
$
|
115.5
|
|
|
$
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
$
|
(32.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During
the year ended December 31, 2008, in addition to providing an
income tax benefit of $115.5 in our statement of operations, the
Company also recorded tax benefits through goodwill and
tax charges through stockholders equity of $3.2 and $27.4, respectively. During the period June 30
through December 31, 2007, in addition to providing an income tax benefit of $42.7 in our statement
of operations, the Company also recorded tax benefits through goodwill and stockholders equity of
$103.0 and $25.0, respectively.
67
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
The benefit (provision) for income taxes in the accompanying statements of operations differs
from the benefit (provision) calculated by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%
due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory tax benefit (expense)
|
|
$
|
157.6
|
|
|
$
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
|
$
|
(27.7
|
)
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
Change in foreign tax rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
Foreign rate differential
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
Dividend received from foreign operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairments
|
|
|
(44.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductible expenses
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax benefit (provision)
|
|
$
|
115.5
|
|
|
$
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
$
|
(32.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The benefit recognized in 2008 reflects recognition of net operating losses and impairment charges
associated with indefinite-lived intangible assets. Impairment charges associated with
goodwill are generally not deductible for tax purposes. The foreign
rate differential for 2008 of $5.7 primarily relates to rate differences applied to impairment charges associated with indefinite-lived
intangible assets.
During the period June 30 through December 31, 2007, the Company recorded an income tax
benefit of $34.6 primarily as a result of a reduction in the German income tax rate. This tax
benefit was partially offset by the recognition of tax expense of $25.5 related to dividends
received from foreign operations, which were offset by operating losses and by operating loss
carryforwards. The Company recorded valuation allowances of $3.1 during the period June 30 through
December 31, 2007, primarily related to our operations in Ireland and for U.S. withholding tax.
(b) Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
224.8
|
|
|
$
|
179.6
|
|
|
Pension and other compensation benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation loss
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
Derivative
financial instruments
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
Foreign tax credit and alternative minimum tax carryforwards
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
Inventory overhead capitalization
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
Transaction fees
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277.6
|
|
|
|
248.7
|
|
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
(47.2
|
)
|
|
|
(36.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances
|
|
|
230.4
|
|
|
|
212.5
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
710.5
|
|
|
|
840.9
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
Inventory valuation
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
Goodwill amortization
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
Pension and other compensation benefits
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
771.0
|
|
|
|
891.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
540.6
|
|
|
$
|
679.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
Deferred income taxes have been classified in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset current (included in other current assets)
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset noncurrent
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability current (included in accrued expenses)
|
|
|
(15.7
|
)
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
Deferred tax liability noncurrent
|
|
|
(546.7
|
)
|
|
|
(690.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
(540.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(679.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company evaluates the realization of deferred tax assets taking into consideration such
factors as the reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, expected profitability by tax
jurisdiction and available carryforward periods. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had valuation
allowances of $47.2 associated with certain foreign net operating loss carryforwards, foreign tax
credit carryforwards, short-lived state net operating losses and other deferred tax assets that are
not expected to be realized. The increase in the deferred tax valuation allowance of $11.0 during 2008 is the result of certain
losses on intercompany financing arrangements, foreign net operating losses, foreign tax credit
carryforwards and short-lived state net operating losses not expected to be realized.
Although a significant component of the Companys valuation allowance reflects assessments
prior to the Merger, beginning January 1, 2009 upon adoption of SFAS 141(R), should applicable
losses, credits and deductions ultimately be realized, the resulting reduction in the valuation
allowance will generally be recognized as a component of our tax benefit (provision).
(c) Other Matters
Neither
income taxes nor foreign withholding taxes have been provided on $194.5 of cumulative
undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008. These earnings are
considered permanently invested in the business.
As
of December 31, 2008, the Company has federal net operating loss
carryforwards of $420.9
that begin to expire in 2025 and state net operating loss carryforwards of $440.1, with a
corresponding state tax benefit of $17.6, that expire at various times through 2028. In addition,
the Company has foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $197.7, which predominantly have
indefinite expirations. Further, as of December 31, 2008, there are U.S. foreign tax credit
carryforwards of $7.3 that will expire at various times through 2018.
The Company files a consolidated federal and certain state combined income tax returns with
its domestic subsidiaries and its parent, VWR Investors.
(d) Uncertain Tax Positions
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes
(FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, we identified
a net unrecorded tax benefit of $1.3 related to uncertainties that existed prior to the CD&R
Acquisition. Accordingly, the Company increased deferred tax assets by $1.3, decreased the reserve
for uncertain tax positions by $0.3, and credited goodwill for $1.6. The liability for uncertain
tax positions was $8.3 as of January 1, 2007, which included $1.3 of accrued interest and estimated
tax penalties.
We conduct business globally and, as a result, the Company or one or more of its subsidiaries,
files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign
jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing
authorities mainly throughout North America and Europe, including jurisdictions in which we have
significant operations such as Germany, France, the UK, Belgium, Sweden and the U.S. We have
concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for years through 2005. Substantially all income tax
matters in the major foreign jurisdictions that we operate have been concluded for years through
2003. Examinations are currently in process in France. Substantially all state and local income tax
matters have been finalized through 2004. Based on the status of examinations, it is not reasonably
possible to determine if these examinations will be concluded in the next twelve months, and accordingly, it
is not possible to estimate the impact through December 2009, if any, to our tax exposure reserves.
As
of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had $8.8 and $15.5, respectively, of
unrecognized tax benefits, including $0.2 and $1.6, respectively, for the payment of interest and
penalties. Accruals for interest and penalties of $0.1 and $0.3 were recognized during the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related
to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense in our consolidated financial
statements. Although substantially all tax uncertainties pertain either directly to the Merger or
relate to uncertain positions from the Predecessor period, beginning January 1,
2009 upon adoption of SFAS 141(R), should such tax uncertainties ultimately be
different, the resultant reduction in tax uncertainties will generally be recognized as a component
of our tax benefit (provision).
69
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
A reconciliation of the reserve associated with uncertain tax positions, exclusive of interest
and penalties, as of the adoption date through December 31, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertain Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Positions
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
7.0
|
|
|
Tax positions related to the current year additions
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
Tax positions related to prior years additions
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
Tax positions related to prior years reductions
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
Tax positions related to the current year additions
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
Tax positions related to prior years reductions
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
Reductions for settlements or payments
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the U.S. federal income tax and German income tax audits
for the 2004 and 2005 tax years were concluded, we benefitted from a Belgian court decision and we
favorably resolved certain other foreign and state tax matters, offset by charges related to a
pre-Merger uncertain tax position that became known to us.
70
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(12) Benefit Programs
The Company sponsors various retirement plans, as summarized below.
(a) U.S. Defined Benefit Plan
The U.S. defined benefit plan (U.S. Retirement Plan) is a funded and tax-qualified defined
benefit retirement plan that covers substantially all VWRs full-time U.S. employees who completed
one full year of service as of May 31, 2005. Benefits under the U.S. Retirement Plan were frozen on
May 31, 2005. The Company generally funds the minimum amount required by applicable laws and
regulations. As of December 31, 2008, the U.S. Retirement Plan covered approximately 3,788
participants. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for the U.S. Retirement Plan.
The change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets, and reconciliation of funded status
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation beginning of period
|
|
$
|
150.6
|
|
|
$
|
141.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
147.4
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation end of period
|
|
|
159.1
|
|
|
|
150.6
|
|
|
|
|
141.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets beginning of period
|
|
|
147.9
|
|
|
|
137.4
|
|
|
|
|
129.3
|
|
|
Actual gain on plan assets
|
|
|
74.1
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets end of period
|
|
|
216.6
|
|
|
|
147.9
|
|
|
|
|
137.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
57.5
|
|
|
$
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet for the U.S. Retirement Plan were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
57.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income or loss pretax
|
|
|
(61.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
The amount in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) that has not been recognized as
net periodic pension cost at December 31, 2008 relates to an actuarial gain. The accumulated
benefit obligation was $159.1 and $150.6 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
71
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
Net periodic pension cost includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
addition to the net periodic pension cost above, the following net actuarial gains (losses) were
included in other comprehensive income or loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net actuarial gain (loss) included in other
comprehensive income or loss
|
|
$
|
61.9
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.7
|
|
The net periodic pension cost and the projected benefit obligation were based on the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate for benefit obligation at period end
|
|
|
5.80
|
%
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
6.35
|
%
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
|
Discount rate for net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
|
|
6.35
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
|
|
5.65
|
%
|
|
Expected rate of return on plan assets for net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
5.70
|
%
|
|
|
6.50% / 8.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
|
Assumed annual rate of compensation increase for benefit
obligation and net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
We select our discount rate by reviewing certain bond yield curves available as of year end
with Moodys ratings of Aa or AA, respectively. Based on our review, at December 31, 2008, we
selected 5.80% to adjust for any differences between the maturity of the reference bonds and the
weighted average maturity date of our future expected benefit payments.
The expected rate of return on plan assets for net periodic pension costs was 8.25% from
January 1 through September 30, 2007 and 6.50% from October 1 through December 31, 2007.
During the third quarter of 2007, we implemented a liability driven investment strategy which
seeks to more closely correlate U.S. Retirement Plan asset returns with expected plan liabilities
thereby reducing the Companys exposure to future expenses and funding obligations. Accordingly,
the U.S. Retirement Plan substantially reallocated its asset holdings from equities into
fixed income funds (which primarily invest in interest rate swaps) during the third and
fourth quarters of 2007. As a result, the expected rate of return on plan assets was revised
downward to 5.70% as of December 31, 2007. During the year ended December 31, 2008, U.S. Retirement
Plan assets experienced a substantial increase in value as the lower interest rate environment
applicable to our fixed income fund returns more than offset both declines in equity
market returns and also the interest rate yield curve
applicable to our discount rate (due to widening credit spreads). The expected rate of return
on equity plan assets was based on historical market returns for each asset class.
72
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
The table below shows the asset allocation target range as of December 31, 2008 and the
December 31, 2008 and 2007 positions for each asset class:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
range at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income and money market funds
|
|
|
80-90
|
%
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
|
Domestic equity funds
|
|
|
5-10
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
International equity funds
|
|
|
5-10
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company does not expect to make contributions to the U.S. Retirement Plan in 2009. The
following benefit payments are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
2014 2018
|
|
|
46.3
|
|
(b) Other U.S. Benefit Plans
The Company also sponsors defined contribution plans as well as a supplemental pension plan
and a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for certain senior officers. The supplemental pension
plan also was frozen on May 31, 2005; it covered three active participants as of December 31, 2008.
In addition, certain employees are covered under union-sponsored, collectively bargained plans.
Expenses under these union-sponsored plans are determined in accordance with negotiated labor
contracts. Expenses incurred under these plans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined contribution plans
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
6.2
|
|
|
Union-sponsored plans
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
Supplemental pension plan
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
Nonqualified deferred compensation plan
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the Company provides health benefits to certain retirees and a limited number of
active employees and their spouses. These benefit plans are unfunded. Shown below are the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and the weighted average discount rate used in
determining the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. The annual cost of these plans is
not material.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit obligations
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.4
|
|
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
|
|
5.80
|
%
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
|
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
9.10
|
%
|
|
|
9.50
|
%
|
|
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed
to decline (the ultimate trend rate)
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
2028
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for
health care plans. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would
change our postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2008 by approximately $0.5.
73
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(c) Non-U.S. Benefit Plans
The Company has defined benefit pension plans at various foreign subsidiaries. Our significant
Non-U.S. defined benefit plans are in Germany, the UK and France. Our German subsidiary has an
unfunded defined benefit pension plan for current employees and retirees. Our UK subsidiary has
established two defined benefit plans. Our French subsidiary has a defined benefit pension plan for
a certain group of employees that is closed to new participants. In addition, the Company has
several small defined benefit pension plans at other locations. The Company uses a December 31
measurement date for these non-U.S. defined benefit plans. Combined information for the German,
French and the UK plans change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets, and reconciliation of
funded status were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation beginning of period
|
|
$
|
103.8
|
|
|
$
|
102.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
104.6
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
Currency translation changes
|
|
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation end of period
|
|
|
82.6
|
|
|
|
103.8
|
|
|
|
|
102.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets beginning of period
|
|
|
73.2
|
|
|
|
73.1
|
|
|
|
|
70.7
|
|
|
Actual (loss) gain on plan assets
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
Currency translation changes
|
|
|
(16.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets end of period
|
|
|
45.3
|
|
|
|
73.2
|
|
|
|
|
73.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
(37.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(29.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(37.6
|
)
|
|
|
(35.2
|
)
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income or loss pretax
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
The
amount in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss that has not been recognized as
net periodic pension cost at December 31, 2008 relates to net actuarial losses. The combined
accumulated benefit obligation was $77.1 and $96.8 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
74
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
Combined net periodic pension cost includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
addition to the combined net periodic pension cost above, the
following net actuarial (losses) gains were
included in other comprehensive income or loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net
actuarial (loss) gain included in other
comprehensive income or loss
|
|
$
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3.6
|
)
|
The combined net periodic pension cost and the combined projected benefit obligation were
based on the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate for benefit obligation
|
|
|
6.13
|
%
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.43
|
%
|
|
|
4.83
|
%
|
|
Discount rate for net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
5.78
|
%
|
|
|
5.43
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.15
|
%
|
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
|
Expected rate of return on plan assets for net
periodic pension cost (French and UK plans only)
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
6.60
|
%
|
|
|
6.17
|
%
|
|
Assumed annual rate of compensation
increase for benefit obligation
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
%
|
|
|
3.37
|
%
|
|
Assumed annual rate of compensation
increase for net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
3.42
|
%
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.70
|
%
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
The Company expects to make contributions to the French and UK plans of approximately $1.4 in
2009. The table below shows the combined asset allocation target and the combined December 31, 2008
and 2007 positions for each asset class:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
range at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following combined benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as
appropriate, are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
2014 2018
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
75
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(d) Other Non-U.S. Postemployment Benefits
Certain of the Companys European subsidiaries provide post employment benefits in the form of
lump-sum cash payments to employees when they leave the Company, regardless of their reason for
leaving. The Company estimates and accrues a liability for these benefits. The largest such plans
are in France and Italy. The combined liability recorded for these plans was $1.9 and $2.0 at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
(13) Share-Based Compensation
(a) Successor Equity Plan
Holdings has established the 2007 Securities Purchase Plan (Successor Equity Plan) pursuant
to which members of management, members of the Board of Directors (Board Members) and consultants
(Consultants) may be provided the opportunity to purchase equity units of Holdings. To date, the
equity units issued by Holdings have consisted of vested Class A Preferred Units (Preferred
Units), vested Class A Common Units (Common Units), and unvested Class A Common Units (Founders
Units). The proceeds of these issuances have ultimately been contributed to the Company as
additional capital contributions.
The Preferred Units, which are fully vested upon issuance, are non-voting units that accrue a
yield at a rate of 8.0% per annum on a daily basis, compounded quarterly, on the amount of
unreturned capital with respect to such Preferred Units. As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate
accrued yield on the outstanding Preferred Units was $179.8, which is
recorded at Holdings.
The Common Units, which are fully vested upon issuance, each are entitled to one vote for all
matters to be voted on by holders of equity units. The Common Units are subordinate to the
Preferred Units, including with respect to the unreturned capital and unpaid yield on the Preferred
Units. Holders of Common Units will be entitled to participate in distributions, if and when
approved by Holdings Board of Managers, ratably on a per-unit basis.
The terms of the Founders Units are the same as the Common Units except that they are subject
to vesting pro rata on a daily basis during the four-year service period following issuance,
subject to accelerated vesting upon the occurrence of certain events. Founders Units are owned upon
issuance. The vesting feature of the Founders Units impacts only the purchase price applicable to
the repurchase and put options described below.
As a holding company that operates through its subsidiaries, Holdings would be dependent on
dividends, payments or other distributions from its subsidiaries to make any dividend payments to
holders of the Preferred Units, Common Units or Founders Units. Holdings has not in the past paid
any dividends on any of the Units and it currently does not expect to pay any dividends on the
Units in the foreseeable future, except for tax distributions to the extent required by Holdings
limited liability company operating agreement.
Successor Equity Plan Activity and Accounting Model Management Investors
On June 29, 2007 and during the period June 30 through December 31, 2007, certain members of
management (Management Investors) acquired an aggregate of $36.4 and $5.2, respectively, in the
equity units of Holdings. During the year ended December 31, 2008, Management Investors acquired
additional equity units of Holdings in the aggregate of $2.3. These investments were allocated to
Preferred Units, Common Units and Founders Units in accordance with the related Management Unit
Purchase Agreements (Management Agreements). The ratio of Preferred Units to Common Units
acquired by the Management Investors was the same as the ratio of Preferred Units to Common Units
acquired by Madison Dearborn and other institutional co-investors in connection with the Merger and
related transactions (the Preferred/Common Ratio).
The equity units purchased by the Management Investors had a fair value, for accounting
purposes, in excess of the original cost paid to purchase such units. The excess was attributed to
the Founders Units. As Founders Units contain a vesting requirement predicated upon an employees
future service with the Company, the excess is recognized as compensation expense over the
applicable four-year vesting period. The fair value of the equity units issued in connection with the Merger and during the period June 30
through December 31, 2007 exceeded their original cost by $14.1. The fair value of equity units
issued during the year ended December 31, 2008 exceeded their original cost by $1.9. During the
year ended December 31, 2008 and during the period June 30 through December 31, 2007, we recognized
non-cash compensation expense relating to the Founders Units of $3.8 and $1.7, respectively, which
was classified as SG&A expenses. As of December 31, 2008,
there was $10.0 of unamortized compensation related to unvested Founders Units, which will be
amortized to compensation expense over their four-year vesting period (a weighted average period of
2.7 years at December 31, 2008).
76
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
The Management Agreements include certain repurchase and put options that are triggered if a
Management Investors employment is terminated. Upon the termination of a Management Investors
employment, Holdings and its affiliates would first have an option to repurchase the Management
Investors equity units in cash. If Holdings or its affiliates do not exercise the option, then the
Management Investor has the right to put the equity units to Holdings. Under the put option,
Holdings payment to the Management Investor would be made in cash for the Preferred Units and via
the issuance of a subordinated promissory note for the Common Units and Founders Units.
Under the repurchase option or put option, the Preferred Units, the Common Units and the
vested Founders Units can be repurchased by or sold to Holdings at fair market value and unvested
Founders Units can be repurchased by or sold to Holdings at the lower of original cost or fair
market value. Upon a termination for cause (as defined in the Management Agreements), Common
Units and vested and unvested Founders Units can be repurchased by or sold to Holdings at the lower
of original cost or fair market value. The fair market value of the equity units is calculated in
accordance with the relevant transaction documents. The fair market value of the Preferred Units
has been based on unreturned capital plus accrued and unpaid yield thereon (the Preferred Unit
Liquidation Preference). The calculation of the fair market value of the Common Units (the Common
Unit Calculated Value) takes into account the enterprise value of Holdings, the Preferred Unit
Liquidation Preference, and the number of outstanding Common Units and Founders Units. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, the Company funded various repurchases of units by Holdings from
terminated employees. As of December 31, 2008, $2.7 was included within accrued expenses in the
accompanying balance sheet relating to the required repurchase of units by Holdings that closed in
January 2009. Holdings is dependent on dividends, payments or other distributions from its
subsidiaries to fund its repurchases of units from terminated employees under the Successor Equity
Plan, and the Company expects to continue to fund such repurchases of units.
As a result of the put option, the equity units issued to the Management Investors are subject
to a repurchase obligation due to events outside of our control. We therefore classify all equity
units held by Management Investors outside of permanent equity on our consolidated balance sheet.
As of December 31, 2008, we have $46.4 recorded as redeemable equity units, which reflects the
aggregate amount that would be paid to Management Investors for the equity units pursuant to the
put option as of the balance sheet date. On a quarterly basis, we expect to continue to adjust the
reported carrying value of redeemable equity units based on the Preferred Unit Liquidation
Preference and Common Unit Calculated Value as of that date, which will result in a corresponding
adjustment to additional paid-in capital.
During the year ended December 31, 2008 and during the period June 30 through December 31,
2007, we adjusted the reported carrying value of redeemable equity units by $5.9 and $8.7,
respectively, with a corresponding adjustment to additional paid-in capital related primarily to
the additional equity units purchased by the Management Investors and the accrual of dividend yield
on Preferred Units held by Management Investors.
Successor Equity Plan Activity Board Members and Consultants
During the period June 30 December 31, 2007, certain Board Members and Consultants acquired
an aggregate of $4.9 in the equity units of Holdings. These investments were allocated to the
Preferred Units and Common Units consistent with the Preferred/Common Ratio, but certain of the
Board Members and Consultants also were permitted to acquire additional Common Units, in accordance
with their respective Unit Purchase Agreements.
During the period June 30 through December 31, 2007, we recognized non-cash compensation
expense of $1.0 relating to the equity units acquired by the Board Members and Consultants, which
was classified as SG&A expenses. The non-cash compensation expense, which is equal to the fair
value of the equity units issued to Board Members and Consultants in excess of their original cost,
was immediately recognized due to the lack of a service or vesting condition.
(b) Predecessor Stock Plan
Shortly after the CD&R Acquisition, we adopted the CDRV Investors, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan
(the Predecessor Stock Plan). Our prior Board of Directors granted rights to purchase shares of
our common stock, options to purchase shares of our common stock, restricted stock units and other
share-based awards to certain of our executive officers, other employees and our directors who were
not also our employees or associated with CD&R. Options granted provided for vesting in equal
annual installments on the first five
anniversaries of the grant date and expired ten years from the grant date. Restricted stock
units granted represented a future right to receive shares of our common stock. Awards vested
earlier upon a change of control or certain other circumstances.
77
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
2007 Activities
During the first quarter of 2007, we sold 500 shares to one of our employees at $98.64 per
share. Coincident with this purchase, the employee was granted options to purchase 1,000 shares at
$98.64 per share. During the period January 1 through June 29, 2007, we issued 1,257 director stock
units to our directors who were not also our employees or associated with CD&R for director
compensation.
2006 Activities
During the first quarter of 2006, we sold 19,643 shares to our President and Chief Executive
Officer at $56.00 per share. The offer to purchase the shares was issued in the fourth quarter of
2005 when the fair market value was $75.00 per share. Coincident with this purchase, this executive
was granted options to purchase 58,929 shares at $75.00 per share.
During the second quarter of 2006, we offered eighty-five of our officers and employees the
option to purchase 40,166 shares at $75.00 per share. The fair value of this purchase option of
$1.3 was charged to operations in the second quarter of 2006. Fifty-one of our officers and
employees ultimately purchased 25,070 shares. In connection with these purchases, these officers
and employees were to be granted two options, for each share purchased, at grant date fair value
during the third quarter of 2006. As a result of the delay in the issuance of the options, these
officers and employees received a special bonus totaling $2.2 that was recorded as a compensation
charge, primarily in the third quarter of 2006.
During the third quarter of 2006, we sold 4,201 shares to our President and Chief Executive
Officer at $119.00 per share. Coincident with this purchase, this executive was granted options to
purchase 12,603 shares at $119.00 per share. Also during the third quarter of 2006, we granted
options to purchase 49,140 shares at $119.00 per share to fifty of our officers and employees in
connection with the offering discussed above that occurred in the second quarter of 2006.
In December 2006, we used the net proceeds from the sale of certain Predecessor debt to pay a
distribution to the holders of our common stock. Under the terms of the Predecessor Stock Plan,
this distribution required an adjustment to the exercise price or other terms of all stock options
outstanding under the Predecessor Stock Plan to the extent necessary or appropriate to reflect the
distribution. Accordingly, the exercise price of all outstanding stock options was reduced, but, in
consideration of applicable U.S. federal tax regulations, we were not able to sufficiently lower
the exercise price of certain stock options. As a result, we made cash payments in the form of
special payments of $13.5 to certain holders of vested and unvested stock options, to ensure that
such holders maintained the same rights and benefits under such options after the distribution as
they had before the distribution. Individual payments were equal to the difference, if any, between
the per share amount of the distribution and the amount by which the option exercise price would
otherwise have been reduced. These payments constitute a partial settlement of certain outstanding
stock options and $1.4 of this payment was recorded as a compensation charge, which represents a
portion of the unamortized grant date fair value of the unvested options that was accelerated as of
the date of payment. In addition, we also charged $12.1 of the payment to additional paid-in
capital since there was no incremental value being provided in connection with the transaction.
Also during 2006, we issued 3,373 director stock units to our directors who were not also our
employees or associated with CD&R for director compensation.
78
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
Valuation Model
The fair value of each option was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The
weighted average fair value of options granted and the assumptions used for each of the reporting
periods are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of options granted
|
|
$
|
42.96
|
|
|
$
|
43.07
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.53
|
%
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
Expected life of options
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time
of grant, the expected life was calculated using the simplified method and volatility was
estimated based on historical peer group industry data. We recognized compensation expense for our
stock options granted to our employees that contain pro-rata vesting on a straight-line basis.
Summary of Employee Option Activity
Information regarding our stock options granted to our employees under the Predecessor Stock
Plan for each of the reporting periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
483,728
|
|
|
|
51.24
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
120,672
|
|
|
|
97.51
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(57,485
|
)
|
|
|
51.58
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(3,421
|
)
|
|
|
52.17
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(25,660
|
)
|
|
|
50.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding prior to distribution
|
|
|
517,834
|
|
|
|
62.04
|
|
|
Repricing due to distribution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(517,834
|
)
|
|
|
62.04
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
456,591
|
|
|
|
24.66
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
61,243
|
|
|
|
59.64
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
|
24.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
515,734
|
|
|
|
28.81
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
98.64
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(900
|
)
|
|
|
24.66
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(5,900
|
)
|
|
|
24.66
|
|
|
Settled pursuant to the Merger
|
|
|
(509,934
|
)
|
|
|
29.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Exercises
Cash received as a result of stock options exercised was $0.2 and the tax benefit realized was
immaterial for the period January 1 through June 29, 2007. Cash received as a result of stock
options exercised was $1.3 and the tax benefit realized was $0.1 for the year ended December 31,
2006. Total intrinsic value related to stock options exercised was $0.4 for the period January
1 through June 29, 2007 and $0.7 for the year ended December 31, 2006. No options were exercised
prior to 2006.
Impact of the Merger
In accordance with the terms of the Predecessor Stock Plan, all unvested options and
restricted stock units vested as a result of the change in control caused by the Merger. We
expensed the unamortized grant date fair value of $6.5 relating to all unvested options and $1.4
relating to all unvested restricted stock units in the period January 1 through June 29, 2007.
Total intrinsic value related to stock options and restricted stock units settled as of the Merger
was $168.3. Share-based compensation of $9.0, including the acceleration of unamortized grant date
fair value as of the Merger, was recorded to SG&A expenses in the period January 1 through June 29,
2007.
79
VWR FUNDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except share data)
(14) Financial Instruments
Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents held with financial
institutions, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, short and long-term debt, foreign
currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and investments held by certain pension plans we
sponsor. The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts
payable and short-term debt approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these
instruments.
Our financial instruments are spread across a number of large financial institutions whose
credit ratings we monitor and believe do not currently carry a material risk of non-performance.
Certain of our financial instruments, including our interest rate swap arrangements, foreign
currency forward contracts and certain of our pension plan assets, contain an off-balance-sheet
risk.
(a) Adoption of SFAS 157
We adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008, with the exception of the application of the
statement to non-recurring non-financial assets and liabilities which we will adopt beginning
January 1, 2009. Non-recurring non-financial assets and liabilities, for which we have not yet
applied the provisions of SFAS 157, include those measured at fair value in goodwill impairment
testing, indefinite lived intangible assets measured at fair value for impairment testing, asset
retirement obligations initially measured at fair value and those initially measured at fair value
in a business combination. More specifically with respect to our goodwill impairment testing
performed through December 31, 2008, the provisions of SFAS 157 were not applied to fair value
measurements of the Companys reporting units (Step 1 of goodwill impairment tests) and
non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value to determine the amount of goodwill
impairment (Step 2 of goodwill impairment tests). See Note 3.
SFAS 157 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuations used to
measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels. Level 1 inputs
are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs
are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration,
for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs
based on our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial
asset or liabilitys classification within the valuation hierarchy is determined based on the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
We apply the fair value provisions of SFAS 157 to our interest rate swap arrangements and also
to our pension plan holdings, including certain funds which
primarily invest in interest rate swaps. We determine the fair value of all of our
direct and indirect interest rate swaps using a discounted cash flow model based on the contractual
terms of the instrument and using observable inputs such as interest rates, counterparty credit
spread and our own credit spread. The discounted cash flow model does not involve significant
management judgment and does not incorporate significant unobservable inputs. Accordingly, we
classify all of our direct and indirect interest rate swap valuations within Level 2 of the SFAS
157 valuation hierarchy.
The following table presents information
about the Companys financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Description
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
|