(Dollars
in millions except where noted)
|
Note No.
|
|
|
|
Page No.
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
In response to a proposal by President
Franklin D. Roosevelt, in 1933, the U.S. Congress created the Tennessee Valley
Authority (“TVA”), a government corporation. TVA was created among
other things, to improve navigation on the Tennessee River, reduce the damage
from destructive flood waters within the Tennessee River System and downstream
on the lower Ohio and Mississippi Rivers, further the economic development of
TVA’s service area in the southeastern United States, and sell the electricity
generated at the facilities TVA operates.
Today, TVA operates the nation’s
largest public power system and supplies power in most of Tennessee, northern
Alabama, northeastern Mississippi, and southwestern Kentucky and in portions of
northern Georgia, western North Carolina, and southwestern Virginia to a
population of nearly nine million people.
TVA also manages the Tennessee River
and its tributaries — the United States’s fifth largest river system — to
provide, among other things, year-round navigation, flood damage reduction, and
affordable and reliable electricity. Consistent with these primary
purposes, TVA also manages the river system to provide recreational
opportunities, adequate water supply, improved water quality, and economic
development.
The power
program has historically been separate and distinct from the stewardship
programs. TVA is required to be self-supporting from power revenues
and proceeds from power financings, such as proceeds from the issuance of bonds,
notes, and other evidences of indebtedness (“Bonds”). Although TVA
does not currently receive congressional appropriations, it is required to make
annual payments to the U.S. Treasury in repayment of, and as a return on, the
government’s appropriation investment in TVA power facilities (the “Power
Facility Appropriation Investment”). In the 1998 Energy and Water
Development Appropriations Act, Congress directed TVA to fund essential
stewardship activities related to its management of the Tennessee River system
and related properties with power funds in the event that there were
insufficient appropriations or other available funds to pay for such activities
in any fiscal year. Congress has not provided any appropriations to
TVA to fund such activities since 1999. Consequently, during 2000,
TVA began paying for essential stewardship activities primarily with power
revenues, with the remainder funded with user fees and other forms of revenues
derived in connection with those activities. These activities related
to essential stewardship properties do not meet the criteria of an operating
segment under the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (“GAAP"). Accordingly, these assets and properties are
included as part of the power program, TVA’s only operating
segment.
Power rates are established by the TVA
Board of Directors (“TVA Board”) as authorized by the Tennessee Valley Authority
Act of 1933, as amended, 16 U.S.C. §§ 831-831ee (as amended, the “TVA
Act”). The TVA Act requires TVA to charge rates for power that will
produce gross revenues sufficient to provide funds for operation, maintenance,
and administration of its power system; payments to states and counties in lieu
of taxes; debt service on outstanding indebtedness; payments to the U.S.
Treasury in repayment of and as a return on the Power Facility Appropriation
Investment; and such additional margin as the TVA Board may consider desirable
for investment in power system assets, retirement of outstanding Bonds in
advance of maturity, additional reduction of the Power Facility Appropriation
Investment, and other purposes connected with TVA’s power
business. In setting TVA’s rates, the TVA Board is charged by the TVA
Act to have due regard for the primary objectives of the TVA Act, including the
objective that power shall be sold at rates as low as are
feasible. Rates set by the TVA Board are not subject to review or
approval by any state or federal regulatory body.
Basis
of Presentation
TVA prepares its interim financial
statements in conformity with GAAP for interim financial
information. Accordingly, TVA’s interim financial statements do not
include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial
statements. Because the accompanying interim financial statements do
not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete
financial statements, they should be read in conjunction with the audited
financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2009, and the notes
thereto, which are contained in TVA’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended September 30, 2009 (the “Annual Report”). In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of items of a normal recurring nature)
considered necessary for fair presentation are included.
Use
of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements
requires TVA to estimate the effects of various matters that are inherently
uncertain as of the date of the financial statements. Although the
financial statements are prepared in conformity with GAAP, management is
required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and
the amounts of revenues and expenses reported during the reporting
period. Each of these estimates varies in regard to the level of
judgment involved and its potential impact on TVA’s financial
results. Estimates are deemed critical either when a different
estimate could have reasonably been used, or where changes in the estimate are
reasonably likely to occur from period to period, and such use or change would
materially impact TVA’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash
flows. TVA’s critical accounting policies are also discussed in Note
1 in the Annual Report
.
Fiscal
Year
TVA’s fiscal year ends September
30. Unless otherwise indicated, years (2010, 2009, etc.) refer to
TVA’s fiscal years. References to years that are preceded by “CY” are to
calendar years.
The following accounting standards
and interpretations became effective for TVA during the first quarter of
2010.
Fair Value
Measurements
. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance for measuring assets and liabilities
that currently require fair value measurement. The guidance also
responds to investors’ requests for expanded information about the extent to
which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information
used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on
earnings. The guidance applies whenever other standards require (or
permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand
the use of fair value in any new circumstances. The guidance
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to
develop measurement assumptions. In February 2008, FASB issued
guidance that delayed the effective date of the fair value accounting
changes
for
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis. Effective October 1, 2009, TVA adopted these fair value
accounting changes for its nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities. The adoption of this guidance did not materially impact
TVA’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
In August 2009, FASB issued guidance
regarding fair value measurements of liabilities
.
The guidance
clarifies how the fair value of a liability should be measured when a quoted
price in an active market for the identical liability either is or is not
available. Additionally, the guidance clarifies how to consider a
restriction when estimating the various measurement techniques results.
These changes became effective for TVA on October 1, 2009. The adoption of
this guidance did not materially impact TVA's financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flows.
In
September 2009, FASB issued guidance regarding fair value measurements for
certain alternative investments, such as interests in hedge funds, private
equity funds, real estate funds, venture capital funds, offshore fund vehicles,
and funds of funds. The guidance allows reporting entities to use net
asset value per share to estimate the fair value of these investments as a
practical expedient. The guidance also requires disclosures by major
category of investment about the attributes of the investments, such as the
nature of any restrictions on the investor's ability to redeem its investments
at the measurement date, any unfunded commitments, and the investment strategies
of the investees. These changes became effective for TVA on October
1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not materially impact
TVA’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Business
Combinations
. In December 2007, FASB issued guidance that
changes the accounting for business combinations. The guidance
establishes principles and requirements for determining how an enterprise
recognizes and measures the fair value of certain assets and liabilities
acquired in a business combination, including non-controlling interests,
contingent consideration, and certain acquired contingencies. The
guidance also requires acquisition-related transaction expenses and
restructuring costs to be expensed as incurred rather than capitalized as a
component of the business combination. In April 2009, FASB issued
additional guidance
to amend and clarify
the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting,
and related disclosures arising from contingencies in a business
combination. This guidance became effective for TVA on October 1,
2009. The adoption of this guidance did not materially impact TVA’s
financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows but will impact the
accounting for any future business acquisitions.
Noncontrolling
Interests
. In December 2007, FASB issued guidance that
introduces significant changes in the accounting for noncontrolling interests
(formerly minority interests) in a partially-owned consolidated
subsidiary. The guidance also changes the accounting for and
reporting for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The guidance
requires that a noncontrolling interest in a consolidated subsidiary be
displayed in the consolidated statement of financial position as a separate
component of equity. The guidance also requires that earnings
attributed to the noncontrolling interests be reported as part of consolidated
earnings, and requires disclosure of the attribution of consolidated earnings to
the controlling and noncontrolling interests on the face of the consolidated
income statement. These changes became effective for TVA on October
1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not materially impact
TVA’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows but will impact
the accounting for any future noncontrolling interests.
The following accounting standards have
been issued, but as of December 31, 2009, were not effective and had not been
adopted by TVA.
Transfers of Financial
Assets
. In June 2009, FASB issued guidance regarding
accounting for transfers of financial assets. This guidance
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (“QSPE”) and
subjects those entities to the same consolidation guidance as other variable
interest entities (“VIEs”). The guidance changes the eligibility
criteria for certain transactions to qualify for sale accounting and the
accounting for certain transfers. The guidance also establishes broad
disclosure objectives and requires extensive specific disclosures related to the
transfers. These changes will become effective for TVA for any
transfers of financial assets occurring on or after October 1,
2010. TVA does not believe adoption of this guidance will materially
affect its financial condition, results of operations, or cash
flows.
Variable Interest
Entities
. In June 2009, FASB issued guidance that changes the
consolidation guidance for VIEs. The guidance eliminates the
consolidation scope exception for QSPEs. The statement amends the
triggering events to determine if an entity is a VIE, establishes a primarily
qualitative model for determining the primary beneficiary of the VIE, and
requires on-going assessments of whether the reporting entity is the primary
beneficiary. These changes will become effective for TVA on October
1, 2010, and will apply to all entities determined to be VIEs as of and
subsequent to the date of adoption. TVA does not believe adoption of
this guidance will materially affect its financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flows.
Accounts receivable primarily consist
of amounts due from customers for power sales. The table below
summarizes the types and amounts of receivables:
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power
receivables billed
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
Power
receivables unbilled
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
Total
power receivables
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
receivables
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Allowance
for uncollectible accounts
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Net
accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
1,093
|
|
|
$
|
1,303
|
|
The table below summarizes the types
and amounts of TVA’s inventories and other current assets
:
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel
inventory
|
|
$
|
572
|
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
|
Materials
and supplies inventory
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
Emission
allowance inventory
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Allowance
for inventory obsolescence
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
Prepaids
and other
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Inventories
and other, net
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
$
|
961
|
|
The table below summarizes the types
and amounts of TVA’s
Other long-term
assets:
|
Other
Long-Term Assets
|
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Loans
and long-term receivables, net
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
Currency
swap assets
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
Coal
contract derivative assets
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
Other
long-term assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Total
other long-term assets
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
Regulatory assets generally represent incurred costs that have been deferred
because such costs are probable of future recovery in customer
rates. These regulatory assets are included in
Deferred nuclear generating
units
and
Other
regulatory assets
on the December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 Balance
Sheets. Regulatory liabilities generally represent obligations to
make refunds to customers for previous collections for costs that are not likely
to be incurred
or
deferral of gains that will be credited to customers in future
periods. These
regulatory
liabilities
are included in
Accounts Payable
and
Accrued
liabilities
and
Regulatory liabilities
on the December
31, 2009 Balance Sheets. Components of
Other
regulatory assets
and
regulatory
liabilities
are summarized in the table below.
|
TVA
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Regulatory
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
other post-retirement benefit costs
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
Deferred
pension costs
|
|
|
3,713
|
|
|
|
3,764
|
|
|
Nuclear
decommissioning costs
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
Non-nuclear
decommissioning costs
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
Debt
reacquisition costs
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
Unrealized
losses relating to TVA’s Financial Trading Program
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
Unrealized
losses on coal contract derivatives
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Unrealized
losses on certain swap and swaption contracts
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
Environmental
cleanup costs - Kingston ash spill
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
Deferred
outage costs
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
Deferred
capital lease asset costs
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
6,972
|
|
|
|
7,287
|
|
|
Deferred
nuclear generating units
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
|
|
2,347
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,221
|
|
|
$
|
9,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gains on coal contract derivatives
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
Capital
lease liabilities
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
Unrealized
gains relating to TVA’s Financial Trading Program
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
Reserve
for future generation
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Accrued
tax equivalents
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
Fuel
cost adjustment liability: short-term
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
863
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
Fuel Cost
Adjustment.
The fuel cost adjustment (“FCA”) provides a
mechanism to regularly alter rates to reflect changing fuel and purchased power
costs. There is typically a lag between the occurrence of a change in
fuel and purchased power costs and the reflection of the change in
rates. As of December 31, 2009, TVA had recognized a short-term
regulatory liability of $620 million with no long-term regulatory liability
related to the FCA. This short-term regulatory liability represents
excess revenues collected to offset fuel and purchased power
costs. The excess revenue is driven by market commodity prices being
lower than those forecasted. This short-term FCA regulatory liability
balance is included in
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
on the Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009.
In August
2009, the TVA Board approved a revision to the FCA formula. Starting
with the October 1, 2009 billing period, all adjustments to the FCA have been
made on a monthly basis instead of a quarterly basis. This allows the
FCA rate to be more closely aligned with TVA’s costs. The FCA formula
also contains a deferred account which is used to reconcile the difference
between actual and forecasted fuel and purchased power costs in the
FCA. The difference between the amounts is included in the deferred
account, and starting with the October 1, 2009 billing period, 50 percent of the
account has been disbursed or collected on a monthly basis instead of a
quarterly basis. This change to a monthly FCA formula is expected to
result in smaller reconciliations and faster liquidation of any balances in the
account. With the change to the monthly FCA formula on October 1,
2009, the remaining balance in the existing deferred liability account balance
at that date from the quarterly FCA formula of approximately $822 million is
being liquidated over a nine-month period from October 1, 2009 through June 30,
2010.
Deferred Outage Costs
.
TVA’s investment in the fuel used in its nuclear units is being amortized and
accounted for as a component of fuel expense. Nuclear refueling outage and
maintenance costs already incurred have historically been deferred and amortized
on a straight-line basis over the estimated period until the next refueling
outage. In August 2009, the TVA Board approved a change in the accounting
for deferred outage costs. Beginning October 1, 2010, outage costs are no
longer deferred as a regulatory asset and are being expensed as incurred.
Previously deferred outage costs continue to be amortized as the remaining
amounts are collected in rates.
The
Event
. On December 22, 2008, approximately five million cubic
yards of water and coal fly ash flowed out of the ash pond at the Kingston
Fossil Plant (“Kingston”) onto approximately 300 acres, primarily Watts Bar
Reservoir and shoreline property owned by the United States and managed by TVA,
but also structurally damaged three homes, interrupted utility service, and
blocked a local road. Fly ash is a coal combustion product of a
coal-fired plant. Kingston used wet ash containment impoundments for
fly ash.
TVA is
conducting cleanup and recovery efforts in conjunction with federal and state
agencies. Under the May 11, 2009 Administrative Order and Agreement
on Consent (“Order and Agreement”) entered into by TVA and the Environmental
Protection Agency (“EPA”) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), TVA retains its status as a lead
federal agency, but TVA's work is subject to review and approval by the EPA, in
consultation with the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation
(“TDEC”). Under the Order and Agreement, response actions are
classified into three categories: time-critical removal; non-time-critical
removal; and remedial actions. Generally, removal of the ash from the
Emory River is time-critical. TVA estimates that this work will be
completed in 2010. Removal of the remaining ash is considered to be
non-time-critical. TVA estimates that this work will be completed in
2013. Once the removal actions are completed, TVA will be required to
assess the site and determine whether any additional actions may be needed at
Kingston or the surrounding impacted area. This assessment and any
additional activities found to be necessary are considered the remedial
actions.
Insurance
. TVA
has property and excess liability insurance programs in place that may cover
some of the Kingston ash spill costs. The insurers for each of these
programs have been notified of the event. Although three of the
insurers that provide liability insurance have denied coverage, TVA is working
with its insurers to provide information, on the event and its cause to
determine applicable coverage. As a result, no estimate for potential
insurance recovery has been accrued.
Claims and
Litigation
. Fifty-seven lawsuits based on the Kingston ash
spill have been filed, and one of these has been voluntarily
dismissed. All of the remaining cases are pending in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. See Note
16
.
Financial
Impact
. TVA has recorded an estimate in the amount of $933
million for the cost of cleanup related to this event. TVA originally
charged this amount to expense in 2009 as follows: $525 million, $150
million, and $258 million during the three months ended December 31, 2008, March
31, 2009, and June 30, 2009, respectively. However, due to actions of
the TVA Board in August 2009, the amount was reclassified as a regulatory asset
during the fourth quarter of 2009 and will be charged to expense as it is
collected in future rates over 15 years, beginning October 1,
2009. TVA has revised the estimated cost of the cleanup over the
course of the project consistent with receipt of better information as the
remediation work has progressed.
As work
progresses and more information is available, TVA will review its estimates and
revise them as appropriate. TVA currently estimates the recovery
process will be completed in 2013. As such, TVA has accrued a portion
of the estimate in current liabilities, with the remaining portion shown as a
long-term liability on TVA’s December 31, 2009 Balance Sheets. Costs
incurred since the event through December 31, 2009, totaled $316 million,
resulting in a remaining estimated liability of $617 million at December 31,
2009.
The $933 million estimate currently
includes, among other things, a reasonable estimate of costs related to ash
dredging and processing, ash disposition, infrastructure repair, dredge cell
repair, root cause analysis, certain legal and settlement costs, environmental
impact studies and remediation, human health assessments, community outreach and
support, regulatory oversight, cenosphere recovery, skimmer wall installation,
construction of temporary ash storage areas, dike reinforcement, project
management, and certain other remediation costs associated with the clean
up. If the actual amount of ash removed is more or less than the
estimate, the expense could change significantly as this affects the largest
cost components of the estimate. The cost of the removal of the ash
is in large part dependent on the final disposal plan, which is still in
development by TVA and regulatory authorities.
Due to
the uncertainty at this time of the final methods of disposal, a range of
reasonable estimates has been developed by cost category and either the known
amounts, most likely scenarios, or low end of the range for each category has
been accumulated and evaluated to determine the total estimate. The
costs related to loading, transport, and disposal of all time critical ash and
final disposition of dredge cell closures are the ones most subject to
change. It is not currently known exactly how much ash will need to
be removed. The range of estimated costs varies from approximately
$933 million to approximately $1.2 billion.
TVA has
not included the following categories of costs in the above estimate since it
has determined that these costs are currently either not probable, not
reasonably estimable, or not appropriately accounted for as part of the estimate
accrual: fines or regulatory directives, outcome of lawsuits, future claims,
long-term environmental impact costs, final long-term disposition of ash
processing area, associated capital asset purchases, ash handling and
disposition from current plant operations, costs of remediating any discovered
mixed waste during ash removal process, and other costs not meeting the
recognition criteria. As ash removal continues, it is possible that
other environmentally sensitive material potentially in the river sediment
before the ash spill may be uncovered. If other materials are
identified, additional remediation not included in the above estimates may be
required.
On
January 26, 2010, the owners of the landfill in Perry County, Alabama that is
receiving the ash dredged from the Emory River filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy. At this time it is unclear whether this filing will cause
TVA to incur any additional costs.
The table below summarizes the types
and amounts of liabilities:
|
Other
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Currency
swap liabilities
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
Swaption
liability
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
Interest
rate swap liabilities
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
Coal
contract derivative liabilities
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Post-retirement
and postemployment benefit obligations
|
|
|
3,656
|
|
|
|
3,678
|
|
|
Other
long-term liability obligations
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
Total
other long-term liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,517
|
|
|
$
|
4,805
|
|
During
the first quarters of 2010 and 2009, TVA’s total asset retirement obligation
(“ARO”) liability increased $34 million and $32 million, respectively, due
primarily to accretion. The nuclear accretion of $26 million and $24
million and the non-nuclear accretion of $11 million and $8 million were
deferred as regulatory assets. However, amounts equal to those
collected in rates for the funding of the nuclear decommissioning trust
(“NDT”) and the asset retirement trust (“ART”) are charged to accretion and
depreciation expense. During the first quarter of 2010, $5 million of
nuclear accretion and $9 million of non-nuclear accretion was expensed as these
amounts were being collected in rates. The nuclear ARO liability as
of December 31, 2009 was $1,863 million. The non-nuclear ARO
liability as of December 31, 2009 was $854 million.
|
Reconciliation
of Asset Retirement Obligation Liability
Three
Months Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
2,683
|
|
|
$
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in nuclear estimates to future cash flows
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Non-nuclear
additional obligations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Changes
in non-nuclear estimates to future cash flows
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,680
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
Add: ARO
accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear
accretion
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
Non-nuclear
accretion
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at end of period
|
|
$
|
2,717
|
|
|
$
|
2,350
|
|
Debt
Outstanding
The TVA Act authorizes TVA to issue
Bonds in an amount not to exceed $30 billion at any time. Debt
outstanding at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, including translation
losses of $41 million and $30 million, respectively, related to Bonds
denominated in foreign currencies, consisted of the following:
|
Debt
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Short-term
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount
notes (net of discount)
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
|
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Total
short-term debt, net
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
22,101
|
|
|
|
22,012
|
|
|
Unamortized
discount
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
Total
long-term debt, net
|
|
|
21,878
|
|
|
|
21,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
outstanding debt
|
|
$
|
22,943
|
|
|
$
|
22,640
|
|
Debt
Securities Activity
The table below summarizes TVA’s
long-term Bond activity for the period from October 1, 2009, to December 31,
2009.
|
|
Date
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Interest
Rate
|
|
|
Issuances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
electronotes
®
|
First
Quarter 2010
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemptions/Maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
electronotes
®
|
First
Quarter 2010
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
%
|
|
2009
Series A
|
November
2009
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
|
2009
Series B
|
December
2009
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3.77
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TVA also
has access to a financing arrangement with the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the TVA
Act. TVA and the U.S. Treasury entered into a memorandum of
understanding under which the U.S. Treasury provides TVA with a $150 million
credit facility. This credit facility matures on September 30, 2010,
and is expected to be renewed. Access to this credit facility or
other similar financing arrangements have been available to TVA since the
1960s. TVA plans to use the U.S. Treasury credit facility as a
secondary source of liquidity. The interest rate on any borrowing
under this facility is based on the average rate on outstanding marketable
obligations of the United States with maturities from date of issue of one year
or less. TVA did not borrow under the credit facility during 2009 or
the three months ended December 31, 2009.
TVA also
has short-term funding available in the form of two short-term revolving credit
facilities of $1.0 billion each, one of which matures on May 12, 2010, and the
other of which matures on November 8, 2010. The credit facilities
accommodate the issuance of letters of credit. The interest rate on
any borrowing and the fees on any letter of credit under these facilities are
variable based on market factors and the rating of TVA’s senior unsecured
long-term non
-credit
enhanced debt. TVA is required to pay an unused facility fee on the
portion of the total $2.0 billion which TVA has not borrowed or committed under
letters of credit. The fee fluctuates depending on the non-enhanced
credit ratings on TVA’s senior unsecured long-term debt. At December
31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, there were $145 million and $103 million,
respectively, of letters of credit outstanding under the facilities, and there
were no outstanding borrowings. TVA anticipates renewing each credit
facility as it matures.
Seven
States Power Corporation ("Seven States"), through its subsidiary, Seven States
Southaven, LLC ("SSSL"), exercised Seven States’s option to purchase an
undivided 90 percent interest in a combined cycle combustion turbine facility in
Southaven, Mississippi. As part of interim joint-ownership
arrangements, Seven States has the right at any time during the interim period,
and for any reason, to require TVA to buy back the Seven States interest in the
facility (and the related assets). TVA will buy back the Seven States
interest if long-term operational and power sales arrangements for the facility
among TVA, Seven States, and SSSL, or alternative arrangements, are not in place
by April 30, 2010. TVA’s buy-back obligation will terminate if such
long-term arrangements are in place by that date or may be extended to a later
date if alternative arrangements are put in place. In the event of a buy-back,
TVA would re-acquire the Seven States interest in the facility and the related
assets. As of February 3, 2010, long-term arrangements were not in
place. TVA, Seven States, and SSSL, however, are discussing
alternative arrangements that would extend TVA’s buy-back obligation to a later
date even if long-term arrangements are not in place by April 30,
2010. Because of TVA’s continued ownership interest in the facility
as well as the buy-back provisions, the transaction did not qualify as a sale
and, accordingly, has been recorded as a leaseback obligation. As of
December 31, 2009, the carrying amount of the obligation was approximately $412
million.
TVA
recognizes certain of its derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities
on its Balance Sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in
the fair value of these instruments depends on (1) whether the derivative
instrument has been designated and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment and
(2) if so, the type of hedge relationship (e.g., cash flow hedge).
TVA is exposed to various market
risks. These market risks include risks related to commodity prices,
investment prices, interest rates, currency exchange rates, inflation, and
counterparty credit risk. To help manage certain of these risks, TVA
has entered into various derivative transactions, principally commodity option
contracts, forward contracts, swaps, swaptions, futures, and options on
futures. Other than certain derivative instruments in investment
funds, it is TVA’s policy to enter into these derivative transactions solely for
hedging purposes and not for speculative purposes.
Overview of Accounting
Treatment
The following tables summarize the
accounting treatment that certain of TVA’s financial derivative transactions
receive.
|
Summary
of Derivative Instruments That Receive Hedge Accounting
Treatment
|
|
|
Derivatives
in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship
|
Objective
of Hedge Transaction
|
Accounting
for Derivative
Hedging
Instrument
|
|
Amount
of Mark-to-Market Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss
(“OCL”) Three Months Ended December 31
|
|
|
Amount
of Exchange (Loss)
Gain
Reclassified from
OCL
to Interest Expense
Three
Months Ended
December
31 (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
swaps
|
To
protect against changes in cash
flows
caused by changes in foreign currency exchange rates (exchange
rate
risk)
|
Cumulative
unrealized gains and losses are recorded in OCL and reclassified to
interest expense to the extent they are offset by cumulative gains and
losses on the hedged transaction
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
(364
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
Note
(a)
There were no ineffective portions or amounts
excluded from effectiveness testing for any of the periods
presented. Also see Note 13.
|
|
|
Summary
of Derivative Instruments That Do Not Receive Hedge Accounting
Treatment
|
|
|
Derivative
Type
|
Objective
of Derivative
|
Accounting
for Derivative Instrument
|
|
Amount
of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized in
Income
on Derivatives
Three
Months Ended
December
31 (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Swaption
|
To
protect against decreases in value of
the
embedded call (interest rate risk)
|
Gains
and losses are recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities until
settlement, at which time the gains/losses (if any) are recognized in
gain/loss on derivative contracts.
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate swaps
|
To
fix short-term debt variable rate to a
fixed
rate (interest rate risk)
|
Gains
and losses are recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities until
settlement, at which time the gains/losses (if any) are recognized in
gain/loss on derivative contracts.
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal
contract derivatives
|
To
protect against fluctuations in market prices of purchased coal (price
risk)
|
Gains
and losses are recorded as regulatory assets or
liabilities. They are recognized in fuel and purchased power
expense when the related coal is used in production.(b)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
derivatives
under
Financial Trading Program
|
To
protect against fluctuations in
market
prices of purchased commodities
(price
risk)
|
Realized
gains and losses are recorded in earnings as fuel and purchased power
expense. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a
regulatory asset/liability.
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
Notes
(a)
All
of TVA’s derivative instruments that do not receive hedge accounting
treatment have unrealized gains (losses) that would otherwise be
recognized in income but instead
are deferred as regulatory assets and liabilities. As such, there was
no related gain (loss) recognized in income for these unrealized gains
(losses) for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008.
(b)
Settlement
fees associated with early contract termination are recognized in fuel and
purchased power expense in the period incurred. Settlement fees with
early contract terminations that qu
alify
for regulatory accounting are recorded as regulatory
assets.
|
|
|
Mark-to-Market
Values of TVA Derivatives
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2009
|
|
At
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Derivatives that Receive Hedge Accounting
Treatment:
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Balance
Sheets Presentation
|
|
Balance
|
|
Balance
Sheets Presentation
|
|
Currency
swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£200
million Sterling
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
£250
million Sterling
|
|
|
36
|
|
Other
long-term assets
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
long-term assets
|
|
£150
million Sterling
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other
long-term assets
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
Derivatives that do Not Receive Hedge Accounting
Treatment:
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Balance
Sheets Presentation
|
|
Balance
|
|
Balance
Sheets Presentation
|
|
Swaption:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1.0
billion notional
|
|
$
|
(455
|
)
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
$
|
(592
|
)
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$476
million notional
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
$42
million notional
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
Coal
contract derivatives
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other
long-term assets
$78,
Other long-term
liabilities ($72)
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
long-term assets
$87, Other long-term
liabilities ($80)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
derivatives under Financial Trading Program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin
cash account*
|
|
|
14
|
|
Inventories
and other, net
|
|
|
28
|
|
Inventories
and other, net
|
|
Unrealized
losses, net
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
Other
regulatory assets
($110),
Regulatory
liabilities
$25
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
Other
regulatory assets
($85),
Regulatory
liabilities
$17
|
|
Note
* In
accordance with certain credit terms, TVA uses leveraging to trade
financial instruments under the Financial Trading Program. Therefore,
the margin cash account balance does not represent 100 percent of the net
market value of the derivative positions outstanding as shown in the
Commodity Derivatives Under Financial Trading Program table
below.
|
Cash
Flow Hedging Strategy for Currency Swaps
To
protect against the exchange rate risk related to three sterling denominated
Bond transactions, TVA entered into foreign currency hedges at the time the Bond
transactions occurred. TVA has the following currency swaps
outstanding as of December 31, 2009:
|
Currency
Swaps Outstanding
As
of December 31, 2009
|
|
Effective
Date of
Currency
Swap
Contract
|
Associated
TVA Bond
Issues
– Currency
Exposure
|
Expiration
Date
of
Swap
|
Overall
Effective
Cost
to TVA
|
|
2003
|
£150
million
|
2043
|
4.96%
|
|
2001
|
£250
million
|
2032
|
6.59%
|
|
1999
|
£200
million
|
2021
|
5.81%
|
When the
dollar strengthens against the British pound sterling, the exchange gain on the
Bond liability is offset by an exchange loss on the swap
contract. Conversely, when the dollar weakens, the exchange loss on
the Bond liability is offset by an exchange gain on the swap
contract. All such exchange gains or losses are included in
Long-term debt,
net
. The offsetting exchange losses or gains on the swap
contracts are recognized in
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss. I
f any loss (gain) were to be incurred as
a result of the early termination of the foreign currency swap contract, any
resulting charge (income) would be amortized over the remaining life of the
associated Bond as a component of interest expense.
Derivatives
Not Receiving Hedge Accounting Treatment
Swaption
and Interest Rate Swaps
TVA has entered into four swaption
transactions to monetize the value of call provisions on certain of its Bond
issues. A swaption grants a third party the right to enter into a
swap agreement with TVA under which TVA receives a floating rate of interest and
pays the third party a fixed rate of interest equal to the interest rate on the
Bond issue for which the call provision has been monetized by
TVA.
|
|
•
|
In
2003, TVA monetized the call provisions on a $1.0 billion Bond issue by
entering into a swaption agreement with a third party in exchange for $175
million (the “2003A Swaption”).
|
|
|
•
|
In
2003, TVA also monetized the call provisions on a $476 million Bond issue
by entering into a swaption agreement with a third party in exchange for
$81 million (the “2003B Swaption”).
|
|
|
•
|
In
2005, TVA monetized the call provisions on two electronotes
®
issues ($42 million total par value) by entering into swaption agreements
with a third party in exchange for $5 million (the “2005
Swaptions”).
|
In February 2004, the counterparty to
the 2003B Swaption exercised its option to enter into an interest rate swap with
TVA, effective April 10, 2004, requiring TVA to make fixed rate payments to the
counterparty of 6.875 percent and the counterparty to make floating payments to
TVA based on London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). These payments
are based on the notional principal amount of $476 million and began on June 15,
2004.
In February 2008, the counterparty to
the 2005 Swaptions exercised its options to enter into interest rate swaps with
TVA, effective March 11, 2008. Under the swaps, TVA is required to
make fixed rate payments to the counterparty at 6.125 percent, and the
counterparty is required to make floating payments to TVA based on
LIBOR. These payments are based on a combined notional amount of $42
million and began on April 15, 2008.
On October 1, 2007, TVA began using
regulatory accounting treatment to defer the mark-to-market gains and losses on
these swap and swaption agreements to reflect that the gain or loss is included
in the ratemaking formula when these transactions settle. The values
of the swap and swaption agreements and related deferred unrealized gains and
losses are recorded on TVA's
Balance
Sheets
with realized gains or losses, if any, recorded on TVA's
Statements
of Operations
. There were no realized gains or losses for the three
months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
For the three months ended December 31,
2009 and 2008, the changes in market value resulted in deferred unrealized gains
(losses) on the value of interest rate swaps and swaption of $218 million and
$(755) million, respectively. All net deferred unrealized gains
(losses) are reclassified as regulatory liabilities (assets) on the
Balance
Sheets
.
Coal
Contract Derivatives
TVA enters into certain coal supply
contracts that require delivery of fixed quantities of coal (base tons) at fixed
prices. Most of these contracts are not required to be marked to
market because (1) they are probable of physical delivery and (2) early net
settlement is not probable. Coal contracts that do not qualify for
this exception are marked to market on a quarterly basis as coal contract
derivatives. Additionally, certain coal contracts also contain
options that permit TVA to either increase or reduce the amounts of coal
delivered within specified guidelines. Essentially, the option to
take more or less coal represents a purchased option that is combined with the
forward coal contract in a single supply contract. TVA marks to
market the value of these contracts on a quarterly basis as coal contract
derivatives.
At December 31, 2009 and September 30,
2009, TVA’s coal contract derivatives had net market values of approximately $6
million and $7 million, respectively, which TVA deferred as regulatory assets
and liabilities on a gross basis. TVA will continue to defer all
unrealized gains or losses related to these contracts and record only realized
gains or losses as fossil fuel expense at the time the coal is used in
production. The $6 million net market value of TVA’s coal contract
derivatives at December 31, 2009, also includes a $15 million expected net
settlement related to the early termination of a coal supply contract subsequent
to December 31, 2009.
|
|
Coal
Contract Derivatives
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2009
|
|
At
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Number
of
Contracts
|
Notional
Amount
(in
tons)
|
Fair
Value (MtM)
(in
millions)
|
|
Number
of Contracts
|
Notional
Amount
(in
tons)
|
Fair
Value (MtM)
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal
Contract Derivatives
|
12
|
30
million
|
$ 6
|
|
7
|
29 million
|
$ 7
|
Commodity
Derivatives Under Financial Trading Program
TVA
has a Financial Trading Program (“FTP”) under which it can purchase and sell
futures, swaps, options, and combinations of these instruments (as long as they
are standard in the industry) to hedge TVA’s exposure to (1) the price of
natural gas, fuel oil, electricity, coal, emission allowances, nuclear fuel, and
other commodities included in TVA’s FCA calculation, (2) the price of
construction materials, and (3) contracts for goods priced in or indexed to
foreign currencies. The combined transaction limit for the FCA and
construction material transactions is $130 million (based on one-day value at
risk). In addition, the maximum hedge volume for the construction
material transactions is 75 percent of the underlying net notional volume of the
material that TVA anticipates using in approved TVA projects, and the market
value of all outstanding hedging transactions involving construction materials
is limited to $100 million at the execution of any new
transaction. The portfolio value at risk limit for the foreign
currency transactions is $5 million and is separate and distinct from the $130
million transaction limit discussed above. Under the FTP, TVA is
prohibited from trading financial instruments for speculative
purposes. At December 31, 2009, the only risks hedged under the FTP
were the economic risks associated with the prices of natural gas, fuel oil, and
crude oil.
|
Commodity
Derivatives Under Financial Trading Program
|
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
Amount
|
|
|
Fair
Value (MtM)
(in
millions)
|
|
|
Notional
Amount
|
|
|
Fair
Value (MtM)
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
gas (in mmBtu)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures
contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
positions
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
Open
positions at end of period
|
|
|
28,280,000
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
30,020,000
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
Net
position at end of period
|
|
|
28,280,000
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
30,020,000
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swap
contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
positions
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
Open
positions at end of period
|
|
|
122,850,000
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
115,307,500
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
Net
position at end of period
|
|
|
122,850,000
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
115,307,500
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
contracts open at end of period
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
7,300,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
gas financial positions
at
end of period, net
|
|
|
152,380,000
|
|
|
$
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
152,627,500
|
|
|
$
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel
oil/crude oil (in barrels)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures
contracts open at end of period
|
|
|
297,000
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
398,000
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swap
contracts open at end of period
|
|
|
1,609,000
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,660,000
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
contracts open at end of period
|
|
|
1,035,000
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,236,000
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel
oil/crude oil financial positions at end of period,
net
|
|
|
2,941,000
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
3,294,000
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
TVA defers all FTP unrealized gains
(losses) as regulatory liabilities (assets) and records only realized gains or
losses to match the delivery period of the underlying commodity
product.
Natural Gas
At December 31, 2009, TVA had natural
gas hedges with notional volumes equivalent to 152,380,000 (in mmBtu), the
market value of which was a net loss of $107 million. The unrealized
loss of $110 million and unrealized gain of $3 million for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, were deferred as a regulatory asset and a regulatory
liability, respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2009, TVA
recognized realized losses on natural gas hedges of $55 million, which were
recorded as an increase to purchased power expense.
At September 30, 2009, TVA had natural
gas hedges with notional volumes equivalent to 152,627,500 (in mmBtu), the
market value of which was a net loss of $81 million. The unrealized
loss of $84 million and unrealized gain of $3 million for the year ended
September 30, 2009, were deferred as a regulatory asset and a regulatory
liability, respectively. For the three months ended December 31,
2008, TVA recognized realized losses on natural gas hedges of $69 million, which
were recorded as an increase to purchased power expense.
Fuel Oil/Crude Oil
At December 31, 2009, TVA had notional
volumes of fuel oil/crude oil hedges equivalent to 2,941,000 (in barrels), the
market value of which was a net gain of $22 million. The unrealized
gain of $22 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, was deferred as a
regulatory liability. For the three months ended December 31, 2009,
TVA recognized realized gains on fuel oil/crude oil hedges of $5 million, which
were recorded as a reduction of fossil fuel expense.
At September 30, 2009, TVA had notional
volumes of fuel oil/crude oil hedges equivalent to 3,294,000 (in barrels), the
market value of which was a net gain of $13 million. The unrealized loss of $1
million and unrealized gain of $14 million for the year ended September 30,
2009, were deferred as a regulatory asset and a regulatory liability,
respectively. For the three months ended December 31, 2008, TVA
recognized realized losses on fuel oil/crude oil hedges of less than $1 million,
which were recorded as an increase to fossil fuel expense.
Other
Derivative Instruments
Other Commodity
Derivatives
TVA enters into forward contracts that
hedge cash flow exposures to market fluctuations in the price and delivery of
certain commodities including coal, natural gas, fuel oil, crude oil,
electricity, uranium, and construction commodities. TVA expects to
take or make delivery, as appropriate, under these forward
contracts. Accordingly, these contracts qualify for normal purchases
and normal sales accounting.
Investment Fund
Derivatives
Investment funds consist primarily of
funds held in trusts designed to fund nuclear decommissioning requirements,
asset retirement obligations, and the supplemental executive retirement plan
(“SERP”). All securities in the trusts are classified as
trading. See Note 13 for a discussion of the trusts’ objectives and
the types of investments included in the various trusts. Derivative
instruments in these trusts include swaps, futures, options, forwards, and other
instruments. As of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, the fair
value of derivative instruments in these trusts was immaterial.
Collateral
TVA’s
interest rate swaps, two of its currency swaps, and its swaption contain
contract provisions that require a party to post collateral (in a form such as
cash or a letter of credit) when the party’s liability balance under the
agreement exceeds a certain threshold. These derivative instruments
contain provisions which may adjust these thresholds based on the credit rating
of TVA’s debt per Standard & Poor’s Rating Service (“S&P”) or Moody’s
Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and TVA’s continued status as a
majority-owned U.S. government entity. If these credit risk-related contingent
features were triggered, TVA could be required by its counterparties to provide
additional collateral on these derivative instruments in net liability
positions.
As of December 31, 2009, the aggregate
fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk related contingent
features that were in a liability position was $661 million. TVA’s
collateral obligation as of December 31, 2009, under these arrangements was $5
million, for which TVA had posted $145 million under a letter of
credit. The difference between the obligation and the collateral
amount is due to the timing of the collateral posting. In January
2010, TVA reduced the posted letter of credit to $5 million. These
letter of credit postings reduce the available balance in TVA’s two $1.0 billion
revolving credit facilities. TVA’s assessment of the risk of its
nonperformance includes a reduction in its exposure under the contract as a
result of this posted collateral. If the credit risk-related
contingent features underlying these agreements were triggered at December 31,
2009, TVA would have been required to post up to $516 million of additional
collateral with its counterparties.
Concentration
of Credit
Credit risk is the exposure to economic
loss that would occur as a result of a counterparty’s nonperformance of its
contractual obligations. Where exposed to credit risk, TVA analyzes
the counterparty’s financial condition prior to entering into an agreement,
establishes credit limits, monitors the appropriateness of those limits, as well
as any changes in the creditworthiness of the counterparty on an ongoing basis,
and employs credit mitigation measures, such as collateral or prepayment
arrangements and master purchase and sale agreements, to mitigate credit
risk. The majority of TVA’s credit risk is limited to trade accounts
receivable from delivered power sales to municipal and cooperative distributor
customers, all located in the Tennessee Valley region. To a lesser
extent, TVA is exposed to credit risk from industries and federal agencies
directly served and from exchange power arrangements with a small number of
investor-owned regional utilities related to either delivered power or the
replacement of open positions of longer-term purchased power or fuel
agreements. Outstanding accounts receivable for the top seven
customers at December 31, 2009, were $393 million, or 36 percent of total
outstanding accounts receivable, and at September 30, 2009, were $528 million,
or 41 percent of total outstanding accounts receivable.
TVA is also exposed to credit risk from
the banking and coal industries because multiple companies in these industries
serve as counterparties to TVA in various derivative transactions. As
of December 31, 2009, the swaption and all of TVA’s currency swaps, interest
rates swaps, and commodity derivatives under the FTP were with counterparties
whose Moody’s credit rating was “A2” or higher. As of December 31,
2009, all of the coal tonnage associated with TVA’s coal contract derivatives
was with counterparties whose Moody’s credit rating, or TVA’s internal analysis
when such information was unavailable, was “B2” or higher.
To
help ensure a reliable supply of coal, TVA had coal contracts with 19 different
suppliers at December 31, 2009. The contracted supply of coal is
sourced from multiple geographic regions of the United States and is to be
delivered via various transportation methods (e.g., barge, rail, and
truck).
Fair
value is determined based on the exchange price that would be received for an
asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in TVA’s principal market,
or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the
asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants. TVA uses market or observable inputs as the preferred
source of values, followed by assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in
the absence of market inputs.
Valuation
Techniques
There are three main approaches to
measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities: (1) the market approach; (2)
the income approach; and (3) the cost approach. The market approach
uses prices and other relevant information generated from market transactions
involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income
approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present
value amount. The measurement is based on the value indicated by
current market expectations about those future amounts of income. The
cost approach is based on the amount that would currently be required to replace
an asset. TVA uses the market approach and the income approach in its
fair value measurements.
The valuation techniques used to
measure fair value are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable
inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable
inputs reflect TVA’s market assumptions. These two types of inputs
create the following fair value hierarchy:
|
Level
1
|
—
|
|
Unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets accessible by the reporting entity for
identical assets or liabilities. Active markets are those in
which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient
frequency and volume to provide pricing.
|
|
Level
2
|
—
|
|
Pricing
inputs other than quoted market prices included in Level 1 that are based
on observable market data and that are directly or indirectly observable
for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability. These include quoted market prices for similar
assets or liabilities, quoted market prices for identical or similar
assets in markets that are not active, adjusted quoted market prices,
inputs from observable data such as interest rate and yield curves,
volatilities and default rates observable at commonly quoted intervals,
and inputs derived from observable market data by correlation or other
means.
|
|
Level
3
|
—
|
|
Pricing
inputs that are unobservable, or less observable, from objective
sources. Unobservable inputs are only to be used to the extent
observable inputs are not available. These inputs maintain the
concept of an exit price from the perspective of a market participant and
should reflect assumptions of other market participants. An
entity should consider all market participant assumptions that are
available without unreasonable cost and effort. These are given
the lowest priority and are generally used in internally developed
methodologies to generate management's best estimate of the fair value
when no observable market data is available.
|
A financial instrument's level within
the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input significant to
the fair value measurement, where Level 1 is the highest and Level 3 is the
lowest.
Nonperformance
Risk
The impact of nonperformance risk,
which includes credit risk, considers changes in current market conditions,
readily available information on nonperformance risk, letters of credit,
collateral, other arrangements available, and the nature of master netting
arrangements. TVA is a counterparty to currency swaps, a swaption,
interest rate swaps, commodity contracts, and other derivatives which subject
TVA to nonperformance risk. Nonperformance risk on the majority of
investments and certain exchange-traded instruments held by TVA is incorporated
into the exit price that is derived from quoted market data that is used to mark
the investment to market.
Nonperformance risk for most of TVA’s
derivative instruments is an adjustment to the initial asset/liability fair
value. TVA adjusts for nonperformance risk, both of TVA (for
liabilities) and the counterparty (for assets), by applying a credit valuation
adjustment (“CVA”). TVA determines an appropriate CVA for each
applicable financial instrument based on the term of the instrument and TVA’s or
counterparty’s credit rating as obtained from Moody’s. For companies
that do not have an observable credit rating, TVA uses internal analysis to
assign a comparable rating to the company. TVA discounts each
financial instrument using the historical default rate (as reported by Moody’s
for CY 1983 to CY 2008) for companies with a similar credit rating over a time
period consistent with the remaining term of the contract as of December 31,
2009.
The following sections describe the
valuation methodologies TVA uses to measure different financial instruments at
fair value. All changes in fair value of these assets and liabilities
have been reflected as changes in regulatory assets, regulatory liabilities, or
accumulated other comprehensive loss on TVA’s B
alance sheets
as of
December 31, 2009, and S
tatements of changes in
proprietary capital
for the three months ended December 31,
2009. There has been no impact to the S
tatements of operations
or the S
tatement
s
of cash flows
related
to these fair value measurements.
Investments
At December 31, 2009, TVA’s investment
funds comprised $1.0 billion of securities classified as trading and measured at
fair value and $2 million of equity investments not required to be measured at
fair value. TVA holds trading securities in its NDT, ART, and
SERP. The NDT holds funds for the ultimate decommissioning of its
nuclear power plants. The ART holds funds for the costs related to
the future closure and retirement of TVA’s long-lived assets. TVA
established a SERP for certain executives in critical positions to provide
supplemental pension benefits tied to compensation that is not creditable under
the qualified pension plan. TVA has historically funded the annual
calculated expense of the SERP. The NDT and SERP are invested in
securities generally designed to achieve a return in line with broad equity
market performance. The ART is presently invested to achieve a return
in line with fixed-income market performance.
The NDT, ART, and SERP are composed of
multiple types of investments. Most U.S. and international equities,
Treasury inflation-protected securities, real estate investment trusts
(“REITs”), cash securities, and certain derivative instruments are
exchange-traded and are classified as Level 1
valuations. Fixed-income investments, high-yield fixed-income
investments, commingled funds, currencies, and most derivative instruments are
classified as Level 2
valuations. These
measurements are based on market and income approaches with observable market
inputs. The application of CVAs did not materially affect the fair
value of TVA’s investments at December 31, 2009.
Gains and losses on trading securities
are recognized in current earnings and are based on average cost. The
gains and losses on the NDT and ART are subsequently reclassified to a
regulatory liability or asset account in accordance with TVA’s regulatory
accounting policy. The NDT had unrealized gains of $20 million for
the three months ended December 31, 2009, and had unrealized losses of $73
million for the three months ended December 31, 2008. The ART had
unrealized gains of less than $1 million for the three months ended December 31,
2009, and had unrealized losses of $1 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2008. The SERP had unrealized gains of $1 million for
the three months ended December 31, 2009, and had unrealized losses of $7
million for the three months ended December 31, 2008.
Currency
Swaps, Swaption, and Interest Rate Swaps
See Note 12 —
Cash Flow Hedging Strategy for
Currency Swaps
and
Derivatives Not Receiving Hedge
Accounting Treatment
for a discussion of the nature, purpose, and
contingent features of TVA’s currency swaps, swaption, and interest rate
swaps.
The currency swaps are classified as
Level 2 valuations and are valued based on income approaches with observable
market inputs. The swaption is classified as a Level 3 valuation and
is valued based on an income approach. The valuation is computed
using a broker-provided pricing model utilizing interest and volatility
rates. While most of the fair value measurement is based on
observable inputs, volatility for TVA’s swaption is generally
unobservable. Therefore, the valuation is derived from an observable
volatility measure with adjustments. The interest rate swaps are
classified as Level 2 valuations and are valued based on income
approaches. At December 31, 2009, the application of CVAs resulted in
a decrease of $1 million in the fair value of the swaption and interest rate
swap liabilities, and a decrease of $2 million in the fair values of the
currency swap assets.
Coal
Contract Derivatives and Commodity Derivatives Under TVA’s Financial Trading
Program
See Note 12 —
Derivatives Not Receiving Hedge
Accounting Treatment — Coal Contract Derivatives
and
Commodity Derivatives Under
Financial Trading Program
for a discussion of the nature and purpose of
coal contract derivatives and commodity derivatives under TVA’s Financial
Trading Program.
Coal Contract
Derivatives
.
These contracts are
classified as Level 3 valuations and are valued based on income
approaches. TVA develops an overall coal price forecast using
widely-used short-term market data from an external pricing specialist,
long-term price forecasts developed with the assistance of a third-party
valuation service, and other internal estimates. To value the volume
option component of applicable coal contracts, TVA uses a Black-Scholes pricing
model which includes inputs from the overall coal price forecast,
contract-specific terms, and other market inputs. The application of
CVAs resulted in a decrease of $2 million in the fair value of applicable coal
contract derivatives in an asset position at December 31, 2009, and did not
materially affect the fair value of applicable coal contract derivatives in a
liability position at December 31, 2009.
Commodity Derivatives Under
Financial Trading Program
. These contracts are valued based on
market approaches which utilize Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”) quoted
prices. Contracts settled on the CME (e.g., futures and options) are
classified as Level 1 valuations. Contracts where nonperformance risk
exists outside of the exit price (e.g., swaps and over-the-counter options) are
measured with the incorporation of CVAs and are classified as Level 2
valuations.
The
application of CVAs did not materially affect the fair value of commodity
derivatives under the FTP at December 31, 2009.
The
following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, TVA's
financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of December 31, 2009. Financial assets and liabilities have
been classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. TVA's assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires
judgment and may affect the determination of the fair value of the assets and
liabilities and their classification in the fair value hierarchy
levels.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
As
of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Netting
1
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
securities
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
Debt
securities-U.S. government corporations and agencies
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
Corporate
debt securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Commercial
mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Collateralized
debt obligations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Commingled
funds
2
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
security commingled funds
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
Debt
security commingled funds
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
Foreign
currency commingled funds
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Other
commingled funds
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
Currency
swaps
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
Coal
contract derivatives
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|