UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
x
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
fiscal year ended: August 31, 2009
OR
o
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
transition period from _______________ to _________________
Commission
File Number 0-18859
SONIC
CORP.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
|
73-1371046
|
|
(State
of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
300
Johnny Bench Drive
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
|
73104
|
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
Zip
Code
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (405) 225-5000
Securities
registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities
registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
Common
Stock, Par Value $.01 (Title of class)
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
T
. No
£
.
(Facing
Sheet Continued)
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
£
. No
T
.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file the reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes
T
.
No
£
.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
£
. No
£
.
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
T
.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large
accelerated filer
T
|
Accelerated
filer
£
|
Non-accelerated
filer
£
|
Smaller
reporting company
£
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act).
Yes
£
. No
T
.
As of
February 28, 2009, the aggregate market value of the 57,065,207 shares of common
stock of the Company held by non-affiliates of the Company equaled $513,586,863
based on the closing sales price for the common stock as reported for that
date.
As of
October 15
,
2009, the
Registrant had 61,079,661 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by
Reference
Part III
of this report incorporates by reference certain portions of the definitive
proxy statement which the Registrant will file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission no later than 120 days after August 31, 2009.
PART I
General
Sonic
Corp. operates and franchises the largest chain of drive-in restaurants (“Sonic
Drive-Ins”) in the United States. References to “Sonic Corp.,” “the
Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” in this Form 10-K are references to Sonic Corp.
and its subsidiaries.
The Sonic
Drive-In restaurant chain began in the early 1950’s. Sonic Corp. was
incorporated in the State of Delaware in 1990 in connection with its 1991 public
offering of common stock. Our principal executive offices are located
at 300 Johnny Bench Drive, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104. Our
telephone number is (405) 225-5000.
The
Sonic Brand
At a
standard Sonic Drive-In restaurant, a customer drives into one of 20 to 36
covered drive-in spaces, orders through an intercom speaker system, and has the
food delivered by a carhop. Many Sonic Drive-Ins also include a
drive-thru lane and patio seating.
Sonic
Drive-Ins feature Sonic signature items, such as specialty drinks including
cherry limeades and slushes, frozen desserts, made-to-order sandwiches and
hamburgers, extra-long chili cheese coneys, hand-battered onion rings, tater
tots, salads, and wraps. Sonic Drive-Ins also offer breakfast items
that include sausage or bacon with egg and cheese Breakfast Toaster
®
or
CroisSONIC
TM
Breakfast Sandwiches, and sausage and egg burritos. Sonic Drive-Ins
serve the full menu all day.
Business
Strategy
Our
objective is to maintain our position as or to become a leading restaurant
operator in all of our markets. We have developed and implemented a
strategy designed to build the Sonic brand and to maintain high levels of
customer satisfaction and repeat business. The key elements of that
strategy are: (1) a unique drive-in concept focusing on a distinctive
menu of quality made-to-order food products including several signature items;
(2) a commitment to customer service featuring the quick delivery of food by
carhops; (3) the expansion of Sonic Drive-Ins within the continental United
States; (4) an owner/operator philosophy, in which managers have an equity
interest in their restaurants, thereby providing an incentive for managers to
operate restaurants profitably and efficiently; and (5) a commitment to strong
franchisee relationships.
Restaurant
Locations
As of
August 31, 2009, the Company had
3,544
Sonic
Drive-Ins in operation from coast to coast, consisting of
475
Partner
Drive-Ins and
3,069
Franchise
Drive-Ins. Partner Drive-Ins are those Sonic Drive-Ins in which the
Company owns a majority interest and the supervisor and manager of the drive-in
typically own a minority interest. Franchise Drive-Ins are owned and
operated by our franchisees. The following table sets forth the
number of Partner Drive-Ins and Franchise Drive-Ins by state as of August 31,
2009:
|
States
|
Partner
|
Franchise
|
Total
|
|
Alabama
|
|
110
|
110
|
|
Arizona
|
|
97
|
97
|
|
Arkansas
|
|
195
|
195
|
|
California
|
|
46
|
46
|
|
Colorado
|
35
|
48
|
83
|
|
Delaware
|
|
4
|
4
|
|
Florida
|
38
|
78
|
116
|
|
Georgia
|
12
|
112
|
124
|
|
Idaho
|
|
19
|
19
|
|
Illinois
|
2
|
39
|
41
|
|
Indiana
|
|
29
|
29
|
|
Iowa
|
2
|
12
|
14
|
|
Kansas
|
37
|
99
|
136
|
|
Kentucky
|
1
|
84
|
85
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
171
|
171
|
|
Maine
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
Maryland
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
Michigan
|
|
7
|
7
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
7
|
7
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
122
|
122
|
|
Missouri
|
15
|
191
|
206
|
|
Montana
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
Nebraska
|
|
29
|
29
|
|
New
Jersey
|
|
9
|
9
|
|
New
York
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
Nevada
|
|
23
|
23
|
|
New
Mexico
|
|
71
|
71
|
|
North
Carolina
|
|
96
|
96
|
|
Ohio
|
|
42
|
42
|
|
Oklahoma
|
91
|
177
|
268
|
|
Oregon
|
|
12
|
12
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
20
|
20
|
|
South
Carolina
|
|
74
|
74
|
|
South
Dakota
|
|
4
|
4
|
|
Tennessee
|
28
|
200
|
228
|
|
Texas
|
214
|
736
|
950
|
|
Utah
|
|
23
|
23
|
|
Virginia
|
|
55
|
55
|
|
Washington
|
|
8
|
8
|
|
West
Virginia
|
|
5
|
5
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
6
|
6
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
4
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
475
|
3,069
|
3,544
|
Expansion
During fiscal year
2009
, we opened
141
Sonic
Drive-Ins, which consisted of
11
Partner
Drive-Ins and
130
Franchise
Drive-Ins. Expansion plans for fiscal year 2010 involve the opening
of multiple Sonic Drive-Ins under area development agreements, as well as
single-store development by long-standing franchisees. We believe
that our existing as well as newly opened markets offer significant growth
opportunities for both Partner Drive-In and Franchise Drive-In
expansion. The ability of Sonic and its franchisees to open the
anticipated number of Sonic Drive-Ins during fiscal year 2010 necessarily will
depend on various factors, including those discussed in this Form 10-K under
Item 1A. Risk Factors –
Failure to successfully implement our growth strategy could reduce, or reduce
the growth of, our revenue and net income
.
Restaurant
Design and Construction
The
typical Sonic Drive-In consists of a kitchen housed in a one-story building
flanked by canopy-covered rows of 20 to 36 parking spaces, with each space
having its own payment terminal, intercom speaker system and menu
board. In addition, since 1995, most new Sonic Drive-Ins have
incorporated a drive-thru service and patio seating area.
Marketing
We have
designed our marketing program to differentiate Sonic Drive-Ins from our
competitors by emphasizing five key areas of customer
satisfaction: (1) wide variety of distinctive made-to-order menu
items, (2) personal delivery of service by carhops, (3) speed of service, (4)
quality, and (5) value. The marketing plan includes promotions for
use throughout the Sonic chain. We support those promotions with
television, radio, interactive media, point-of-sale materials, and other media
as appropriate. Those promotions generally center on products which
highlight limited time new product introductions or signature menu items of
Sonic Drive-Ins.
Each year
Sonic develops a marketing plan with the involvement of the Sonic Franchise
Advisory Council. (Information concerning the Sonic Franchise
Advisory Council is set forth on page
6
under Franchise
Program -
Franchise Advisory
Council
.) Funding for our marketing plan is comprised of the
System Marketing Fund, the Sonic Brand Fund and local advertising
expenditures.
The
System Marketing Fund focuses on purchasing advertising on national cable and
broadcast networks and other national media, sponsorship and brand enhancement
opportunities. The Sonic Brand Fund is our national media production
fund. Our franchise agreements require advertising
contributions to these funds by franchisees. Franchisees are also
required to spend additional amounts on local advertising, typically through
participation in the local advertising cooperative.
The total
amount spent on media (principally television) was approximately $
184
million for
fiscal year 2009, and we expect media expenditures to exceed $
178
million for
fiscal 2010.
Purchasing
We
negotiate with suppliers for our primary food products and packaging supplies to
ensure adequate quantities of food and supplies and to obtain competitive
prices. We seek competitive bids from suppliers on many of our food
products. We approve suppliers of those products and require them to
adhere to our established product and food safety
specifications. Suppliers manufacture several key products for Sonic
under private label and sell them to authorized distributors for resale to Sonic
Drive-Ins. We require all Sonic Drive-Ins to purchase from approved
distribution centers.
Food
Safety and Quality Assurance
To ensure
the consistent delivery of safe, high-quality food, we created a food safety and
quality assurance program. Sonic’s food safety program promotes the
quality and safety of all products and procedures utilized by all Sonic
Drive-Ins, and provides certain requirements that must be adhered to by all
suppliers, distributors, and Sonic Drive-Ins. We also have a
comprehensive, restaurant-based food safety program called Sonic
Safe. Sonic Safe is a risk-based system that utilizes Hazard Analysis
& Critical Control Points (HACCP) principles for managing food safety and
quality. Our food safety system includes employee training, supplier
product testing, unannounced drive-in food safety auditing by independent
third-parties, and other detailed components that monitor the safety and quality
of Sonic’s products and procedures at every stage of the food preparation and
production cycle. Employee food safety training is covered under our
Sonic Drive-In training program, referred to as the STAR Training
Program. This program includes specific training information and
requirements for every station in the drive-in. We also require our
drive-in managers and assistant managers to pass the ServSafe training
program. ServSafe is the most recognized food safety training
certification in the restaurant industry.
Company
Operations
Restaurant
Personnel
. A typical Partner Drive-In is operated by a
manager, two to four assistant managers, and approximately 25 hourly employees,
many of whom work part-time. The manager has responsibility for the
day-to-day operations of the Partner Drive-In. Each supervisor has
the responsibility of overseeing an average of four to seven Partner
Drive-Ins. Sonic Restaurants, Inc. (“SRI”), Sonic’s operating
subsidiary, oversees the operations and development of and provides
administrative services to all Partner Drive-Ins.
Ownership
Program
. Our philosophy stresses an ownership relationship
with supervisors and managers. As part of the ownership program,
either a limited liability company or a general partnership is formed to own and
operate each individual Partner Drive-In. SRI owns a majority
interest, typically at least 60%, in each of these limited liability companies
and partnerships. Generally, the supervisors and managers own a
minority interest in the limited liability company or partnership. The amount of
ownership percentage is separately negotiated for each Partner
Drive-In. Supervisors and managers are not employees of Sonic or of
the limited liability companies or partnerships in which they have an ownership
interest. As owners, they share in the cash flow and are responsible
for their share of any losses incurred by their Partner Drive-Ins. We
believe that our ownership structure provides a substantial incentive for
Partner Drive-In supervisors and managers to operate their restaurants
profitably and efficiently. Additional information regarding our
ownership program can be found under
Ownership Program,
in Part
II, Item 7, at page
24
of this Form 10-K.
Sonic
records the interests of supervisors and managers as “minority interest in
earnings of Partner Drive-Ins” under costs and expenses on its financial
statements. We estimate that the average percentage interest of a
supervisor was
17
% and the average
percentage interest of a manager in a Partner Drive-In was
21
% in fiscal year
2009. Each Partner Drive-In distributes its available cash flow to
its supervisors and managers and to Sonic on a monthly basis pursuant to the
terms of the operating agreement or partnership agreement for that
restaurant. Sonic has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase
the minority interest of the supervisor or manager in the
restaurant. The amounts of the buy-in and the buy-out are generally
based on the Partner Drive-In’s sales during the preceding 12 months and
approximate the fair market value of a minority interest in that
restaurant. Most supervisors and managers finance the buy-in with a
loan from a third-party financial institution.
Each
Partner Drive-In usually purchases equipment with funds borrowed from Sonic at
competitive rates. In most cases, Sonic also owns or leases the land
and building and guarantees any third-party lease entered into for the
site.
Partner Drive-In
Data
. The following table provides certain financial
information relating to Partner Drive-Ins and the number of Partner Drive-Ins
opened and closed during the past five fiscal years.
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Average
Sales per Partner Drive-In (
in
thousands
)
|
|
$
|
954
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
1,017
|
|
|
$
|
980
|
|
|
$
|
957
|
|
|
Number
of Partner Drive-Ins:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Open at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
Newly-Opened
and Re-Opened
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Purchased
from Franchisees
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Sold
to Franchisees
(1)
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
Closed
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Total
Open at Year End
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
(1)
The large number of drive-ins sold by Sonic in fiscal 2009 reflects the
refranchising initiative which Sonic implemented in fiscal 2009 and
includes
88
drive-ins in which Sonic retained a minority
interest.
|
Franchise
Program
General
. As of
August 31, 2009, we had
3,069
Franchise
Drive-Ins in operation. A large number of successful multi-unit
franchisee groups have developed during the Sonic system’s 56 years of
operation. Those franchisees continue to develop new Franchise
Drive-Ins in their franchise territories either through area development
agreements or single-site development. Our franchisees opened
130
Franchise
Drive-Ins during fiscal year 2009. We consider our franchisees a
vital part of our continued growth and believe our relationship with our
franchisees is good.
Franchise
Agreements
. For traditional drive-ins, the current franchise
agreement provides for an initial franchise fee of $45,000 per drive-in, a
royalty fee of up to 5% of gross sales on a graduated percentage basis,
advertising fees of up to 5.9% of gross sales, and a 20-year
term. For fiscal year 2009, Sonic’s average royalty rate was equal to
3.87
%.
Area Development
Agreements
. We use area development agreements to facilitate
the planned expansion of the Sonic Drive-In restaurant chain through multiple
unit development. While many existing franchisees continue to expand
on a single drive-in basis, approximately
88
% of the new
Franchise Drive-Ins opened during fiscal year 2009 occurred as a result of
then-existing area development agreements. Each area development
agreement gives a developer the exclusive right to construct, own, and operate
Sonic Drive-Ins within a defined area. In exchange, each developer
agrees to open a minimum number of Sonic Drive-Ins in the area within a
prescribed time period.
During
fiscal year 2009, we entered into
nine
new area
development agreements calling for the opening of
104
Franchise
Drive-Ins and amended
seven
existing area
development agreements calling for the opening of an additional
37
Franchise
Drive-Ins, all during the next seven years. We currently have more
than
150
area
development agreements in effect, calling for the development of approximately
970
Sonic
Drive-Ins during the next seven years. We cannot give any assurance that our
franchisees will achieve that number of new Franchise Drive-Ins during the next
seven years. Of the
196
Franchise
Drive-Ins scheduled to open during fiscal year 2009 under area development
agreements in place at the beginning of that fiscal year,
115
or
59
% opened during
the period. During fiscal year 2009, we terminated
14
of the
170
area
development agreements existing at the beginning of the fiscal
year. The terminated area development agreements called for the
opening of
41
Franchise Drive-Ins in fiscal year 2009 and an additional
24
Franchise
Drive-Ins in the next seven fiscal years. All of these terminations
were as a result of the franchisee failing to meet the development schedule
under the area development agreement.
In
addition to the area development agreement commitments, during fiscal 2007,
existing franchisees purchased options to develop drive-ins, which allow them to
open new drive-ins under an older form of license agreement with a lower
franchise fee and royalty rate, rather than the current form of license
agreement. As of August 31, 2009, 264 options remained
outstanding. The development options and area development agreements
together reflect a total development pipeline of
1,234
drive-ins in
the next seven fiscal years.
Beginning
in fiscal 2010, we have
also offered
development incentives to our franchisees. These incentives include
(i) a reduced franchise fee for the second drive-in and waiver of the franchise
fee for subsequent drive-ins opened by the franchisee in fiscal 2010; and (ii)
for all drive-ins opened in “developing markets” before March 31, 2011, waiver
of the franchise fee, waiver of the royalty fees during the first five years of
operation and payment of an additional advertising contribution during the
fourth and fifth years of operation. “Developing markets” are those
markets where the penetration of Sonic Drive-Ins (as measured by population per
restaurant, advertising level and share of restaurant spending) has not yet
reached the level of market maturity established by management.
Franchise Drive-In
Development
. We assist each franchisee in selecting sites and
developing Sonic Drive-Ins. Each franchisee has responsibility for
selecting the franchisee’s drive-in location but must obtain our approval of
each Sonic Drive-In design and each location based on accessibility and
visibility of the site and targeted demographic factors, including population
density, income, age, and traffic. We provide our franchisees with
the physical specifications for the typical Sonic Drive-In.
Franchisee
Financing
. Other than the agreements described below, we do
not generally provide financing to franchisees or guarantee loans to franchisees
made by third-parties.
We had an
agreement with GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation (“GEC”) pursuant to
which GEC made loans to existing Sonic franchisees who met certain underwriting
criteria set by GEC. Under the terms of the agreement with GEC, Sonic
provided a guaranty of 10% of the outstanding balance of a loan from GEC to the
Sonic franchisee. The portions of loans made by GEC to Sonic
franchisees that are guaranteed by the Company total $
13.0
million as of
August 31, 2009. We ceased guaranteeing new loans made under the
program during fiscal year 2002 and have not been required to make any payments
under our agreement with GEC.
We have
an agreement with Irwin Franchise Capital Corporation (“IFCC”) pursuant to which
IFCC has agreed to make loans to existing Sonic franchisees who meet certain
underwriting criteria set by IFCC to finance the equipment and improvements for
our retrofit program in which significant trade dress modifications are being
made to Sonic Drive-Ins. Under the terms of the agreement with IFCC,
we will provide a guaranty to IFCC of the greater of (i) 5% of the outstanding
balance of a loan from IFCC to the Sonic franchisee or (ii) $250,000, provided
that in no event will our maximum liability to IFCC exceed $3.75 million in the
aggregate. As of August 31, 2009, the total amount guaranteed under
the IFCC agreement was $
1.3
million
.
Franchise Advisory
Council
. Our Franchise Advisory Council provides advice,
counsel, and input to Sonic on important issues impacting the business, such as
marketing and promotions, operations, purchasing, building design, human
resources, technology, and new products. The Franchise Advisory
Council currently consists of 20 members selected by Sonic. We have
six executive committee members who are selected at large, 12 regional members
representing four defined regions of the country, and two at large members
representing new franchisees and smaller operators. We have four
Franchise Advisory Council task groups comprised of approximately 50 members who
serve three-year terms and lend support on individual key
priorities.
Franchise Drive-In
Data
. The following table provides certain financial
information relating to Franchise Drive-Ins and the number of Franchise
Drive-Ins opened, purchased from or sold to Sonic, and closed during Sonic’s
last five fiscal years.
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Average
Sales Per Franchise Drive-In (
in
thousands
)
|
|
$
|
1,122
|
|
|
$
|
1,154
|
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
|
$
|
1,092
|
|
|
$
|
1,039
|
|
|
Number
of Franchise Drive-Ins:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Open at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
2,689
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
|
|
2,465
|
|
|
|
2,346
|
|
|
New
Franchise Drive-Ins
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
Sold
to the Company
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
Purchased
from the Company
(1)
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Closed
and Terminated,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
of Re-openings
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
Total
Open at Year End
|
|
|
3,069
|
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
2,689
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
|
|
2,465
|
|
|
|
(1)
The large number of drive-ins sold by Sonic in fiscal 2009 reflects the
refranchising initiative which Sonic implemented in fiscal 2009 and
includes
88
drive-ins in which Sonic retained a minority
interest.
|
Competition
We
compete in the restaurant industry, a highly competitive industry in terms of
price, service, location, and food quality. The restaurant industry
is often affected by changes in consumer trends, economic conditions,
demographics, traffic patterns, and concerns about the nutritional content of
quick-service foods. We compete on the basis of speed and quality of
service, method of food preparation (made-to-order), food quality and variety,
signature food items, and limited-time promotions. The quality of
service, featuring Sonic carhops, constitutes one of our primary marketable
points of difference from the competition. There are many
well-established competitors with substantially greater financial and other
resources. These competitors include a large number of national,
regional, and local food services, including quick-service restaurants and
casual dining restaurants. A significant change in pricing or other
marketing strategies by one or more of those competitors could have an adverse
impact on Sonic’s sales, earnings, and growth. In selling franchises,
we also compete with many franchisors of quick-service and other restaurants and
other business opportunities.
Seasonality
Our
results during Sonic’s second fiscal quarter (the months of December, January
and February) generally are lower than other quarters because of the lower
temperatures in the locations of a number of Partner Drive-Ins and Franchise
Drive-Ins, which tends to reduce customer visits to our drive-ins.
Employees
As of
August 31, 2009, we had
350
full-time
corporate employees. This number does not include the approximately
13,800
full-time and part-time employees employed by separate partnerships and
limited liability companies that operate our Partner Drive-Ins or the
supervisors and managers of the Partner Drive-Ins who own a minority interest in
the separate partnerships or limited liability companies.
None of
our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We
believe that we have good labor relations with our employees.
Intellectual
Property
Sonic
owns or is licensed to use valuable intellectual property including trademarks,
service marks, patents, copyrights, trade secrets and other proprietary
information, including the “Sonic” logo and trademark, which are of material
importance to our business. Depending on the jurisdiction, trademarks
and service marks generally are valid as long as they are used and/or
registered. Patents, copyrights and licenses are of varying
durations.
Customers
Our
business is not dependent upon either a single customer or small group of
customers.
Government
Contracts
No
portion of our business is subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of
contracts or subcontracts at the election of the U.S. government.
Environmental
Matters
We are
not aware of any federal, state or local environmental laws or regulations that
will materially affect our earnings or competitive position or result in
material capital expenditures. However, we cannot predict the effect on
operations of possible future environmental legislation or regulations. During
fiscal year 2009, there were no material capital expenditures for environmental
control facilities, and no such material expenditures are
anticipated.
Available
Information
We
maintain a website with the address of
www.sonicdrivein.com
. Copies
of the Company’s reports filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and
Exchange Commission on Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K and any amendments to such
reports are available for viewing and copying at such website, free of charge,
as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material with, or furnishing
it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, copies of
Sonic’s corporate governance materials, including the Corporate Governance
Guidelines, Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, Code of Ethics for Financial
Officers, and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are available for viewing and
copying at the website, free of charge.
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. A
forward-looking statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of future
events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances may not
occur. Investors should not place undue reliance on the
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this
report. These forward-looking statements are all based on currently
available operating, financial and competitive information and are subject to
various risks and uncertainties. Our actual future results and trends
may differ materially depending on a variety of factors including, but not
limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed below. Accordingly,
such forward-looking statements do not purport to be predictions of future
events or circumstances and may not be realized. For these reasons,
you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We
undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise them, except as may be
required by law.
Events
reported in the media, such as incidents involving food-borne illnesses or food
tampering, whether or not accurate, can cause damage to our reputation and
rapidly affect sales and profitability.
Reports,
whether true or not, of food-borne illnesses, such as e-coli, avian flu, bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (commonly known as mad cow disease), hepatitis A or
salmonella, and injuries caused by food tampering have in the past severely
injured the reputations of participants in the restaurant industry and could in
the future affect us. The potential for terrorism of our nation’s
food supply also exists and, if such an event occurs, it could have a negative
impact on our brand’s reputation and could severely hurt sales, revenues, and
profits.
Our
brand’s reputation is an important asset to the business; as a result, anything
that damages our brand’s reputation could immediately and severely hurt sales,
revenues, and profits. If customers become ill from food-borne
illnesses or food tampering, we could also be forced to temporarily close some,
or all, Sonic Drive-Ins. In addition, instances of food-borne
illnesses or food tampering occurring at the restaurants of competitors could,
by resulting in negative publicity about the restaurant industry, adversely
affect our sales on a local, regional, or
national basis. A
decrease in customer traffic as a result of these health concerns or negative
publicity, or as a result of a temporary closure of any Sonic Drive-Ins, could
materially harm our brand, sales, and profitability.
The
restaurant industry is highly competitive, and that competition could lower our
revenues, margins, and market share.
The
restaurant industry is intensely competitive with respect to price, service,
location, personnel, dietary trends, including nutritional content of
quick-service foods, and quality of food, and is often affected by changes in
consumer tastes and preferences, economic conditions, population, and traffic
patterns. We compete with international, regional and local
restaurants, some of which operate more restaurants and have greater financial
resources. We compete primarily through the quality, price, variety,
and value of food products offered. Other key competitive factors include the
number and location of restaurants, quality and speed of service, attractiveness
of facilities, effectiveness of advertising and marketing programs, and new
product development by us and our competitors. Some of our
competitors have substantially larger marketing budgets, which may provide them
with a competitive advantage. In addition, our system competes within
the quick-service restaurant industry not only for customers but also for
management and hourly employees, suitable real estate sites, and qualified
franchisees.
Changing
dietary preferences may cause consumers to avoid our products in favor of
alternative foods.
The
restaurant industry is affected by consumer preferences and
perceptions. Although we monitor these changing preferences and
strive to adapt to meet changing consumer needs, growth of our brand and,
ultimately, system-wide sales depend on the sustained demand for our
products. If dietary preferences and perceptions cause consumers to
avoid certain products offered by Sonic Drive-Ins in favor of different foods,
demand for our products may be reduced, and our business could be
harmed.
Our
earnings and business growth strategy depends in large part on the success of
our franchisees, who exercise independent control of their
businesses.
We have
significantly increased the percentage of restaurants owned and operated by our
franchisees. A portion of our earnings comes from royalties, rents
and other amounts paid by our franchisees. Franchisees are
independent contractors, and their employees are not our
employees. We provide training and support to, and monitor the
operations of, our franchisees, but the quality of their drive-in operations may
be diminished by any number of factors beyond our
control. Franchisees may not successfully operate drive-ins in a
manner consistent with our high standards and requirements, and franchisees may
not hire and train qualified managers and other restaurant
personnel. Any operational shortcoming of a Franchise Drive-In is
likely to be attributed by consumers to the entire Sonic brand, thus damaging
our reputation and potentially affecting revenues and
profitability.
Changes
in economic, market and other conditions could adversely affect Sonic and its
franchisees, and thereby Sonic’s operating results.
The
quick-service restaurant industry is affected by changes in economic conditions,
consumer tastes and preferences and spending patterns, demographic trends,
consumer perceptions of food safety, weather, traffic patterns, the type, number
and location of competing restaurants, and the effects of war or terrorist
activities and any governmental responses thereto. Factors such as
interest rates, inflation, gasoline prices, food costs, labor and benefit costs,
legal claims, and the availability of management and hourly employees also
affect restaurant operations and administrative expenses. Economic
conditions, including interest rates and other government policies impacting
land and construction costs and the cost and availability of borrowed funds,
affect our ability and our franchisees’ ability to finance new restaurant
development, improvements and additions to existing restaurants, and the
acquisition of restaurants from, and sale of restaurants to,
franchisees. Inflation can cause increased food, labor and benefits
costs and can increase our operating expenses. As operating expenses
increase, we recover increased costs by increasing menu prices, to the extent
permitted by competition, or by implementing alternative products or cost
reduction procedures. We cannot ensure, however, that we will be able
to recover increases in operating expenses in this manner.
Our
financial results may fluctuate depending on various factors, many of which are
beyond our control.
Our sales
and operating results can vary from quarter to quarter and year to year
depending on various factors, many of which are beyond our
control. Certain events and factors may directly and immediately
decrease demand for our products. If customer demand decreases
rapidly, our results of operations would also decline
precipitously. These events and factors include:
|
|
•
|
variations
in the timing and volume of Sonic Drive-Ins’
sales;
|
|
|
•
|
sales
promotions by Sonic and its
competitors;
|
|
|
•
|
changes
in average same-store sales and customer
visits;
|
|
|
•
|
variations
in the price, availability and shipping costs of supplies such as food
products;
|
|
|
•
|
seasonal
effects on demand for Sonic’s
products;
|
|
|
•
|
unexpected
slowdowns in new drive-in development
efforts;
|
|
|
•
|
changes
in competitive and economic conditions generally including increases in
energy costs;
|
|
|
•
|
changes
in the cost or availability of ingredients or
labor;
|
|
|
•
|
weather
and other acts of God; and
|
|
|
•
|
changes
in the number of franchise agreement
renewals.
|
Our
profitability may be adversely affected by increases in energy
costs.
Our
success depends in part on our ability to absorb increases in energy
costs. Various regions of the United States in which we operate
multiple drive-ins have experienced in the recent past significant increases in
energy prices. If these increases occur again, they would have an
adverse effect on our profitability.
Shortages
or interruptions in the supply or delivery of perishable food products or rapid
price increases could adversely affect our operating results.
We are dependent on
frequent deliveries of perishable food products that meet certain
specifications. Shortages or interruptions in the supply of
perishable food products may be caused by unanticipated demand, problems in
production or distribution, acts of terrorism, financial or other difficulties
of suppliers, disease or food-borne illnesses, inclement weather or other
conditions. We purchase large quantities of food and supplies, which
can be subject to significant price fluctuations due to seasonal shifts, climate
conditions, industry demand, energy costs, changes in international commodity
markets and other factors. These shortages or rapid price increases
could adversely affect the availability, quality and cost of ingredients, which
would likely lower revenues and reduce our profitability.
Failure
to successfully implement our growth strategy could reduce, or reduce the growth
of, our revenue and net income.
We plan
to increase the number of Sonic Drive-Ins, but may not be able to achieve our
growth objectives, and any new drive-ins may not be profitable. The
opening and success of drive-ins depend on various factors,
including:
|
|
•
|
competition
from other restaurants in current and future
markets;
|
|
|
•
|
the
degree of saturation in existing
markets;
|
|
|
•
|
consumer
interest in the Sonic brand;
|
|
|
•
|
the
identification and availability of suitable and economically viable
locations;
|
|
|
•
|
sales
levels at existing drive-ins;
|
|
|
•
|
the
negotiation of acceptable lease or purchase terms for new
locations;
|
|
|
•
|
permitting
and regulatory compliance;
|
|
|
•
|
the
cost and availability of construction
resources;
|
|
|
•
|
the
ability to meet construction
schedules;
|
|
|
•
|
the
availability of qualified franchisees and their financial and other
development capabilities;the cost and availability of and delays in
financing;
|
|
|
•
|
the
ability to hire and train qualified management
personnel;
|
|
|
•
|
general
economic and business conditions.
|
If we are
unable to open as many new drive-ins as planned, if the drive-ins are less
profitable than anticipated or if we are otherwise unable to successfully
implement our growth strategy, revenue and profitability may grow more slowly or
even decrease.
Our
outstanding and future leverage could have an effect on our
operations.
On
December 20, 2006, the Company closed on a securitized financing facility
comprised of a $600 million fixed rate term loan and a $200 million variable
rate revolving credit facility. As of August 31, 2009, we had $
511
million in
outstanding debt under the fixed rate note at an interest rate of 5.7% and
$
187.3
million outstanding under the variable rate note at an interest rate of
1.4%.
Our
increased leverage could have the following consequences:
|
|
•
|
We
may be more vulnerable in the event of deterioration in our business, in
the restaurant industry or in the economy generally. In
addition, we may be limited in our flexibility in planning for or reacting
to changes in our business and the industry in which we
operate.
|
|
|
•
|
We
may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to the
payment of interest on our indebtedness, which could reduce the amount of
funds available for operations or development of new Partner Drive-Ins and
thus place us at a competitive disadvantage as compared with competitors
that are less leveraged.
|
|
|
•
|
From
time to time, we may engage in various capital markets, bank credit and
other financing activities to meet our cash requirements. We
may have difficulty obtaining additional financing at economically
acceptable interest rates.
|
|
|
•
|
Our
existing and future debt obligations may contain certain negative
covenants including limitations on liens, consolidations and mergers,
indebtedness, capital expenditures, asset dispositions, sale-leaseback
transactions, stock repurchases and transactions with affiliates, which
may reduce our flexibility in responding to changing business and economic
conditions.
|
|
|
•
|
Our
debt obligations are subject to customary rapid amortization events and
events of default. Although management does not anticipate an
event of default or any other event of noncompliance with the provisions
of the notes, if such an event occurred, the unpaid amounts outstanding
could become immediately due and
payable.
|
|
|
•
|
The
third-party insurance company that provides credit enhancements in the
form of financial guaranties of our fixed and variable rate note payments
has been the subject of credit rating downgrades by Standard & Poor’s
and Moody’s, which ratings were CC and Caa2, respectively, at October 29,
2009. We are unable to determine whether additional downgrades
may occur and what impact prior downgrades have had or additional
downgrades would have on our insurer’s financial condition. If
the insurance company were to become the subject of insolvency or similar
proceedings, our lenders would not be required to fund additional advances
on our variable rate notes. In addition, an event of default
would occur if: (i) the insurance company were to become the subject of
insolvency or similar proceedings and (ii) the insurance policy were not
continued or sold to a third party (who would assume the insurance
company’s obligations under the policy), but instead were terminated or
canceled as a result of those proceedings. In an event of default, all
unpaid amounts under the fixed and variable rate notes could become
immediately due and payable only at the direction or consent of holders
with a majority of the outstanding principal. Such acceleration
of our debt could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity if we
were unable to negotiate mutually acceptable new terms with our lenders or
if alternate funding were not available to
us.
|
Sonic
Drive-Ins are subject to health, employment, environmental and other government
regulations, and failure to comply with existing or future government
regulations could expose us to litigation, damage to our reputation and lower
profits.
Sonic and
its franchisees are subject to various federal, state and local laws affecting
their businesses. The successful development and operation of
restaurants depends to a significant extent on the selection and acquisition of
suitable sites, which are subject to zoning, land use (including the placement
of drive-thru windows), environmental (including litter), traffic and other
regulations. More stringent requirements of local and state
governmental bodies with respect to zoning, land use and environmental factors
could delay, prevent or make cost prohibitive the continuing operations of an
existing restaurant or the development of new restaurants in particular
locations. Restaurant operations are also subject to licensing and
regulation by state and local departments relating to health, food preparation,
sanitation and safety standards, federal and state labor and immigration laws
(including applicable minimum wage requirements, overtime, working and safety
conditions and work authorization requirements), federal and state laws
prohibiting discrimination and other laws regulating the design and operation of
facilities, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act. If we fail
to comply with any of these laws, we may be subject to governmental action or
litigation, and our reputation could be accordingly harmed. Injury to
our reputation would, in turn, likely reduce revenues and profits.
In recent
years, there has been an increased legislative, regulatory and consumer focus on
nutrition and advertising practices in the food industry, particularly among
restaurants. As a result, we may become subject to regulatory
initiatives in the area of nutritional content, disclosure or advertising, such
as requirements to provide information about the nutritional content of our food
products, which could increase expenses. The operation of our
franchise system is also subject to franchise laws and regulations enacted by a
number of states and rules promulgated by the U.S. Federal Trade
Commission. Any future legislation regulating franchise relationships
may negatively affect our operations, particularly our relationship with our
franchisees. Failure to comply with new or
existing franchise laws and
regulations in any jurisdiction or to obtain required government approvals could
result in a ban or temporary suspension on future franchise
sales. Changes in applicable accounting rules imposed by governmental
regulators or private governing bodies could also affect our reported results of
operations.
We are
subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act, which governs such matters as minimum
wage, overtime and other working conditions, along with the Americans with
Disabilities Act, various family leave mandates and a variety of other laws
enacted, or rules and regulations promulgated, by federal, state and local
governmental authorities that govern these and other employment
matters. We have experienced and expect further increases in payroll
expenses as a result of government-mandated increases in the minimum wage, and
although such increases are not expected to be material, there may be material
increases in the future. Enactment and enforcement of various
federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations on immigration and labor
organizations may adversely impact the availability and costs of labor for our
restaurants in a particular area or across the United States. In
addition, our vendors may be affected by higher minimum wage standards or
availability of labor, which may increase the price of goods and services they
supply to us.
Litigation
from customers, franchisees, employees and others could harm our reputation and
impact operating results.
Claims of
illness or injury relating to food content, food quality or food handling are
common in the quick-service restaurant industry. In addition, class
action lawsuits have been filed, and may continue to be filed, against various
quick-service restaurants alleging, among other things, that quick-service
restaurants have failed to disclose the health risks associated with foods we
serve and that quick-service restaurants’ marketing practices have encouraged
obesity and other health issues. In addition to decreasing our sales
and profitability and diverting management resources, adverse publicity or a
substantial judgment against us could negatively impact our reputation,
hindering the ability to attract and retain qualified franchisees and grow the
business.
Further,
we may be subject to employee, franchisee and other claims in the future based
on, among other things, discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination and
wage, rest break and meal break issues, including those relating to overtime
compensation.
We
may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property, which could
decrease the value of our brand and products.
The
success of our business depends on the continued ability to use existing
trademarks, service marks and other components of our brand in order to increase
brand awareness and further develop branded products. All of the
steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not be
adequate.
Our
reputation and business could be materially harmed as a result of data
breaches.
Unauthorized
intrusion into portions of our computer systems or those of our franchisees that
process and store information related to customer transactions may result in the
theft of customer data. We rely on proprietary and commercially
available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide security for
processing, transmission and storage of confidential customer information, such
as payment card and personal information. Further, the systems
currently used for transmission and approval of payment card transactions, and
the technology utilized in payment cards themselves, all of which can put
payment card data at risk, are determined and legally mandated by payment card
industry standards, not by us. Improper activities by third-parties,
advances in computer and software capabilities and encryption technology, new
tools and discoveries and other events or developments may facilitate or result
in a compromise or breach of our or our franchisees’ computer
systems. Any such compromises or breaches could cause interruptions
in our operations and damage to our reputation, subject us to costs and
liabilities and hurt sales, revenues and profits.
Disruptions
in the financial markets may adversely impact the availability and cost of
credit and consumer spending patterns.
The
disruptions to the financial markets and continuing economic downturn have
adversely impacted the availability of credit already arranged and the
availability and cost of credit in the future. The disruptions in the
financial markets also had an adverse effect on the economy, which has
negatively impacted consumer spending patterns. There can be no
assurance that various governmental responses to the disruptions in the
financial markets will restore consumer confidence, stabilize the markets or
increase liquidity or the availability of credit.
Ownership
and leasing of significant amounts of real estate exposes us to possible
liabilities and losses.
We own or
lease the land and building for all Partner Drive-Ins. Accordingly,
we are subject to all of the risks associated with owning and leasing real
estate. In particular, the value of our assets could decrease and our
costs could increase because of changes in the investment climate for real
estate, demographic trends and supply or demand for the use of our drive-ins,
which may result from competition from similar restaurants in the area, as well
as liability for environmental conditions. We generally cannot cancel
the leases, so if an existing or future Sonic Drive-In is not profitable, and we
decide to close it, we may nonetheless be committed to perform our obligations
under the applicable lease including, among other things, paying the base rent
for the balance of the lease term. In addition, as each of the leases
expires, we may fail to negotiate renewals, either on commercially acceptable
terms or at all, which could cause us to close drive-ins in desirable
locations.
Catastrophic
events may disrupt our business.
Unforeseen
events, or the prospect of such events, including war, terrorism and other
international conflicts, public health issues including health epidemics or
pandemics, and natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes, or other
adverse weather and climate conditions, whether occurring in the United States
or abroad, could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of franchisees,
suppliers or customers, or result in political or economic
instability. These events could reduce demand for our products or
make it difficult or impossible to receive products from suppliers.
It
em
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Of the 475 Partner
Drive-Ins operating as of August 31, 2009, we operated 262 of them on property
leased from third-parties and
213
of them on
property we own. The leases expire on dates ranging from 2010 to
2028, with the majority of the leases providing for renewal
options. All leases provide for specified monthly rental payments,
and some of the leases call for additional rentals based on sales
volume. All leases require Sonic to maintain the property and pay the
cost of insurance and taxes. We also own the real property on which
166 Franchise Drive-Ins are operated. These leases for Franchise
Drive-Ins expire on dates ranging from 2012 to 2029, with the majority of the
leases providing for renewal options. The majority of the leases for
Franchise Drive-Ins provide for percentage rent based on sales volume, with a
minimum base rent. These leases generally require the
franchisee to maintain the property and pay the costs of insurance and
taxes.
Our
corporate headquarters are located in the Bricktown district of downtown
Oklahoma City. We have a 15-year lease to occupy approximately 83,000
square feet. The lease expires in November 2018 and has two five-year
renewal options. Sonic believes its properties are suitable for the
purposes for which they are being used.
It
em
3. Legal Proceedings
The
Company is involved in various legal proceedings and has certain unresolved
claims pending. Based on the information currently available,
management believes that all claims currently pending are either covered by
insurance or would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business
or financial condition.
It
em
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
Sonic did
not submit any matter during the fourth quarter of the Company’s last fiscal
year to a vote of Sonic’s stockholders, through the solicitation of proxies or
otherwise.
It
em
4A. Executive Officers of the Company
Identification
of Executive Officers
The
following table identifies the executive officers of the Company:
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Officer Since
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.
Clifford Hudson
|
54
|
Chairman
of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|
June
1985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.
Scott McLain
|
47
|
President
of Sonic Corp. and President of Sonic Industries Services
Inc.
|
April
1996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen
C. Vaughan
|
43
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
January
1996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omar
Janjua
|
51
|
President
of Sonic Restaurants, Inc.
|
October
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paige
S. Bass
|
40
|
Vice
President, General Counsel and Assistant Corporate
Secretary
|
January
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carolyn
C. Cummins
|
51
|
Vice
President of Compliance and Corporate Secretary
|
April
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terry
D. Harryman
|
44
|
Vice
President and Controller
|
January
1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claudia
San Pedro
|
40
|
Vice
President of Investor Relations and Brand Strategies and
Treasurer
|
January
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharon
T. Strickland
|
56
|
Vice
President of People
|
January
2008
|
Business
Experience
The
following sets forth the business experience of the executive officers of the
Company for at least the past five years:
J.
Clifford Hudson has served as the Company’s Chairman of the Board since January
2000 and Chief Executive Officer since April 1995. Mr. Hudson served
as President of the Company from April 1995 to January 2000 and reassumed that
position from November 2004 until May 2008. He has served in various
other offices with the Company since 1984. Mr. Hudson has served as a
Director of the Company since 1993. Mr. Hudson has served on the
Board of Trustees of the Ford Foundation since January 2006 and on the Board of
Trustees of the National Trust for Historic Preservation since January 2001,
where he now serves as Chairman of the Board.
W. Scott
McLain has served as President of the Company since May 2008. He also
has served as President of Sonic Industries Services Inc. since September
2004. He served as Executive Vice President of the Company from
November 2004 until May 2008. He served as the Company’s Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from January 2004 until November 2004
and as the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from
January 2000 until January 2004. Mr. McLain joined the Company in
1996.
Stephen
C. Vaughan has served as Executive Vice President of the Company and Chief
Financial Officer since August 2008 and was the Company’s Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer from November 2004 until August 2008. Mr.
Vaughan also served as Treasurer of the Company from November 2001 until April
2005. He joined the Company in 1992.
Omar
Janjua has served as President of Sonic Restaurants, Inc. since September
2009. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer for The Steak n Shake Company from June 2007 to September
2009. Prior to joining Steak n Shake, Mr. Janjua worked for 18 years
with Yum Brands, Inc. in its Pizza Hut operations in various positions of
increasing responsibility, lastly as Vice President of Company
Operations.
Paige S.
Bass has served as Vice President and General Counsel of the Company since
January 2007 and has also served as Assistant Corporate Secretary since October
2008. Ms. Bass joined the Company as Associate
General Counsel in April
2004. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Bass was employed
seven
years as an
associate with the law firm of Crowe & Dunlevy in Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma.
Carolyn
C. Cummins has served as the Company’s Corporate Secretary since January 2007
and as the Company’s Vice President of Compliance since April
2004. Ms. Cummins joined the Company as Assistant General Counsel in
January 1999.
Terry D.
Harryman has served as Vice President of the Company since January 2008 and as
the Company’s Controller since January 1999. Mr. Harryman has also
served as the Controller of Sonic Restaurants, Inc. and Sonic Industries
Services Inc. since January 2002. Mr. Harryman joined the Company in
1996.
Claudia
San Pedro has served as Vice President of Investor Relations and Brand
Strategies of the Company since October 2009. She served as Vice
President of Investor Relations of the Company from January 2007 until October
2009. She has also served as Treasurer of the Company since January
2007 and as Treasurer of Sonic Industries Services Inc. and Sonic Restaurants,
Inc. since November 2006. She served as the Director of the Oklahoma
Office of State Finance from June 2005 through November 2006. From
July 2003 to May 2005, Ms. San Pedro served as the Budget Division Director for
the Office of State Finance.
Sharon T.
Strickland has served as Vice President of People of the Company since January
2008. She served as Senior Director of Potential from August 2005
until January 2008. Ms. Strickland was a Human Resources Advisor for
Kerr-McGee Corporation from April 2004 until August 2005.
PART II
It
em
5. Market for the Company’s
Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
Market
Information
The
Company’s common stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market (“Nasdaq”) under the
symbol “SONC.” The following table sets forth the high and low sales price for
the Company’s common stock during each fiscal quarter within the two most recent
fiscal years as reported on Nasdaq.
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
August 31, 2009
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
August 31, 2008
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
$
|
18.19
|
|
|
$
|
5.78
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.19
|
|
|
$
|
21.57
|
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
$
|
12.86
|
|
|
$
|
7.35
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
$
|
24.65
|
|
|
$
|
18.53
|
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
$
|
12.09
|
|
|
$
|
6.05
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
$
|
23.33
|
|
|
$
|
18.54
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
$
|
11.75
|
|
|
$
|
8.34
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.38
|
|
|
$
|
12.50
|
|
Stockholders
As of
October 15, 2009, the Company had 678 record holders of its common
stock.
Dividends
The
Company did not pay any cash dividends on its common stock during its two most
recent fiscal years and does not intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable
future as profits are reinvested in the Company to fund expansion of its
business, repurchases of the Company’s common stock, and payments under the
Company’s financing arrangements. As in the past, future payment of
dividends will be considered after reviewing, among other factors, returns to
stockholders, profitability expectations and financing needs.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
It
em
6. Selected Financial Data
The
following table sets forth
selected financial data
regarding the Company’s financial condition and operating
results. One should read the following information in conjunction
with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations,” below, and the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included
elsewhere in this report.
Selected
Financial Data
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Year
ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
(1)
|
|
|
2005
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-In sales
|
|
$
|
567,436
|
|
|
$
|
671,151
|
|
|
$
|
646,915
|
|
|
$
|
585,832
|
|
|
$
|
525,988
|
|
|
Franchise
Drive-Ins:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
royalties
|
|
|
126,706
|
|
|
|
121,944
|
|
|
|
111,052
|
|
|
|
98,163
|
|
|
|
88,027
|
|
|
Franchise
fees
|
|
|
5,006
|
|
|
|
5,167
|
|
|
|
4,574
|
|
|
|
4,747
|
|
|
|
4,311
|
|
|
Gain
on sale of Partner Drive-Ins
|
|
|
13,154
|
|
|
|
3,044
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,487
|
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
7,196
|
|
|
|
4,520
|
|
|
|
4,740
|
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
|
718,789
|
|
|
|
804,713
|
|
|
|
770,469
|
|
|
|
693,262
|
|
|
|
623,066
|
|
|
Cost
of Partner Drive-In sales
|
|
|
480,227
|
|
|
|
548,102
|
|
|
|
520,176
|
|
|
|
468,627
|
|
|
|
421,906
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
63,358
|
|
|
|
61,179
|
|
|
|
58,736
|
|
|
|
52,048
|
|
|
|
47,503
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
48,064
|
|
|
|
50,653
|
|
|
|
45,103
|
|
|
|
40,696
|
|
|
|
35,821
|
|
Provision
for impairment of long-lived
assets
|
|
|
11,163
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
602,812
|
|
|
|
660,505
|
|
|
|
625,180
|
|
|
|
561,635
|
|
|
|
505,617
|
|
|
Income
from operations
|
|
|
115,977
|
|
|
|
144,208
|
|
|
|
145,289
|
|
|
|
131,627
|
|
|
|
117,449
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net
|
|
|
35,657
|
|
|
|
47,927
|
|
|
|
44,406
|
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
|
|
5,785
|
|
|
Income
before income taxes
|
|
$
|
80,320
|
|
|
$
|
96,281
|
|
|
$
|
100,883
|
|
|
$
|
124,049
|
|
|
$
|
111,664
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
49,442
|
|
|
$
|
60,319
|
|
|
$
|
64,192
|
|
|
$
|
78,705
|
|
|
$
|
70,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
per share
(2)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares used in calculation
(2)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
60,761
|
|
|
|
60,403
|
|
|
|
68,019
|
|
|
|
86,260
|
|
|
|
89,992
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
61,238
|
|
|
|
62,270
|
|
|
|
70,592
|
|
|
|
89,239
|
|
|
|
93,647
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital (deficit)
|
|
$
|
84,813
|
|
|
$
|
(13,115
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,784
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35,585
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,093
|
)
|
|
Property,
equipment and capital leases, net
|
|
|
523,938
|
|
|
|
586,245
|
|
|
|
529,993
|
|
|
|
477,054
|
|
|
|
422,825
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
849,041
|
|
|
|
836,312
|
|
|
|
758,520
|
|
|
|
638,018
|
|
|
|
563,316
|
|
|
Obligations
under capital leases (including current portion)
|
|
|
39,461
|
|
|
|
37,385
|
|
|
|
39,318
|
|
|
|
36,625
|
|
|
|
38,525
|
|
|
Long-term
debt (including current portion)
|
|
|
699,550
|
|
|
|
759,422
|
|
|
|
710,743
|
|
|
|
122,399
|
|
|
|
60,195
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(4,268
|
)
|
|
|
(64,116
|
)
|
|
|
(106,802
|
)
|
|
|
391,693
|
|
|
|
387,917
|
|
|
Cash
dividends declared per common share
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Previously
reported prior-year results have been adjusted to implement SFAS 123R on a
modified retrospective basis.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Adjusted
for a three-for-two stock split in
2006.
|
It
em
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Overview
Description
of the Business
.
Sonic operates
and franchises the largest chain of drive-in restaurants in the United
States. As of August 31, 2009, the Sonic system was comprised of
3,544 drive-ins, of which 13% were Partner Drive-Ins and 87% were Franchise
Drive-Ins. Sonic Drive-Ins feature signature menu items such as
specialty drinks and frozen desserts, made-to-order sandwiches and a unique
breakfast menu. The Company derives revenues primarily from Partner
Drive-In sales and royalties from franchisees. The Company also
receives revenues from initial franchise fees and, to a lesser extent, from the
selling and leasing of signs and real estate.
Costs of
Partner Drive-In sales, including minority interest in earnings of drive-ins,
relate directly to Partner Drive-In sales. Other expenses, such as
depreciation, amortization, and general and administrative expenses, relate to
the Company’s franchising operations, as well as Partner Drive-In
operations. Our revenues and expenses are directly affected by the
number and sales volumes of Partner Drive-Ins. Our revenues and, to a
lesser extent, expenses also are affected by the number and sales volumes of
Franchise Drive-Ins. Initial franchise fees and franchise royalties
are directly affected by the number of Franchise Drive-In openings.
Overview
of Business Performance
.
Fiscal year 2009
was a challenging year marked by economic disruptions and constrained consumer
discretionary spending. In response to these and other challenges, we
made progress against a number of initiatives during the year. In
January 2009, we introduced the Sonic Everyday Value Menu featuring 11 items for
$1. We also made significant progress against our refranchising
initiative evidenced by the sale of 205 Partner Drive-Ins to franchisees during
the year. Partner Drive-Ins now comprise 13% of the entire
system, down from 20% at the beginning of the fiscal year.
Investments
by franchisees in new and existing development remained solid throughout the
year, with the opening of 130 new drive-ins, the relocation or rebuilding
of 46 existing drive-ins, and the completion of 337 retrofits for the
fiscal year. We also opened the first Sonic Drive-Ins in several new markets and
new states with very strong opening results.
The
growth and success of our business is built around implementation of our
multi-layered growth strategy, which features the following
components:
|
|
·
|
Same-store
sales growth fueled by increased media expenditures, new product news,
improved sales performance of Partner Drive-Ins and product and service
differentiation initiatives;
|
|
|
·
|
Expansion
of the Sonic brand through new unit growth, particularly by
franchisees;
|
|
|
·
|
Increased
franchising income stemming from franchisee new unit growth, same-store
sales growth and our unique ascending royalty rate;
and
|
|
|
·
|
The
use of excess cash for shareholder value-enhancing
initiatives.
|
The
following table provides information regarding the number of Partner Drive-Ins
and Franchise Drive-Ins in operation as of the end of the years indicated as
well as the system-wide growth in sales and average unit volume. System-wide
information includes both Partner Drive-In and Franchise Drive-In information,
which we believe is useful in analyzing the growth of the brand as well as the
Company’s revenues since franchisees pay royalties based on a percentage of
sales.
System-Wide
Performance
($
in thousands)
|
|
|
Year
Ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Percentage
increase in sales
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System-wide
drive-ins in operation
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
at beginning of period
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
|
3,188
|
|
|
Opened
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
Closed
(net of re-openings)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
Total
at end of period
|
|
|
3,544
|
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
sales per drive-in:
|
|
$
|
1,093
|
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in same-store sales
(2)
:
|
|
|
(4.3
|
%)
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Drive-ins
that are temporarily closed for various reasons (repairs, remodeling,
relocations, etc.) are not considered closed unless the Company determines
that they are unlikely to reopen within a reasonable
time.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents
percentage change for drive-ins open for a minimum of 15
months.
|
System-wide
same-store sales decreased 4.3% during fiscal year 2009 primarily as a result of
a decrease in the average check amount. The decrease in check is
consistent with an industry trend of consumers purchasing fewer items per
transaction and purchasing lower-priced items, such as items from our Everyday
Value Menu. The Company has initiated strategies to offset this trend
including offering a free upgrade to a 44 ounce drink with the purchase of a
combo meal during the summer of 2009 and increasing the discount percentage when
consumers purchase a combo meal versus the ala carte menu pricing.
During
fiscal year 2009, our system-wide media expenditures were approximately $184
million as compared to $190 million in fiscal year
2008. Approximately one-half of our media dollars are spent on
system-wide marketing fund efforts, which are largely used for network cable
television advertising. Expenditures for national cable advertising
increased from approximately $95 million in fiscal year 2008 to approximately
$96 million in fiscal year 2009. Increased network cable advertising
provides several benefits including the ability to more effectively target and
better reach the cable audience, which surpasses broadcast networks in terms of
viewers. In addition, national cable advertising allows us to bring
additional depth to our media and expand our message beyond our traditional
emphasis on a single monthly promotion. The balance of our
system-wide media expenditures is focused on local store
advertising. Looking forward, we expect system-wide media
expenditures to exceed $178 million in fiscal 2010, with the system-wide
marketing fund representing approximately one-half of total media
expenditures.
The
following table provides information regarding drive-in development across the
system. Retrofits represent investments to upgrade the exterior look
of our drive-ins, typically including an upgraded building exterior, new more
energy-efficient lighting, a significantly enhanced patio area, and improved
menu housings.
|
|
|
Year
ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
New
drive-ins:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
Franchise
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
System-wide
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
Rebuilds/relocations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
Franchise
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
System-wide
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Retrofits,
including rebuilds/relocations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
Franchise
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
System-wide
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
Results
of Operations
Revenues
.
The following
table sets forth the components of revenue for the reported periods and the
relative change between the comparable periods.
|
Revenues
|
|
|
($
in thousands)
|
|
|
Year
Ended August 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Increase/
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Percent
Increase/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-In sales
|
|
$
|
567,436
|
|
|
$
|
671,151
|
|
|
$
|
(103,715
|
)
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)%
|
|
Franchise
revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
royalties
|
|
|
126,706
|
|
|
|
121,944
|
|
|
|
4,762
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
Franchise
fees
|
|
|
5,006
|
|
|
|
5,167
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
Gain on sale of Partner Drive-Ins
|
|
|
13,154
|
|
|
|
3,044
|
|
|
|
10,110
|
|
|
|
332.1
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,487
|
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
3,080
|
|
|
|
90.4
|
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
$
|
718,789
|
|
|
$
|
804,713
|
|
|
$
|
(85,924
|
)
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
Year
Ended August 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
Increase/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-In sales
|
|
$
|
671,151
|
|
|
$
|
646,915
|
|
|
$
|
24,236
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
Franchise revenues:
Franchise
royalties
|
|
|
121,944
|
|
|
|
111,052
|
|
|
|
10,892
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
Franchise fees
|
|
|
5,167
|
|
|
|
4,574
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
Gain on sale of Partner
Drive-Ins
|
|
|
3,044
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
|
|
315.8
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
7,196
|
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
(52.7
|
)
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
804,713
|
|
|
$
|
770,469
|
|
|
$
|
34,244
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
The
following table reflects the changes in Partner Drive-In sales and comparable
drive-in sales. It also presents information about average unit
volumes and the number of Partner Drive-Ins, which is useful in analyzing the
growth of Partner Drive-In sales.
|
Partner
Drive-In Sales
|
|
|
($
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-In sales
|
|
$
|
567,436
|
|
|
$
|
671,151
|
|
|
$
|
646,915
|
|
|
Percentage
change
|
|
|
(15.5
|
%)
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-Ins in operation
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
at beginning of period
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
Opened
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
Acquired
from (sold to) franchisees, net
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Closed
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
Total
at end of period
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
sales per Partner Drive-In
|
|
$
|
954
|
|
|
$
|
1,007
|
|
|
$
|
1,017
|
|
|
Percentage
change
|
|
|
(5.3
|
%)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
%)
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in same-store sales
(2)
|
|
|
(6.4
|
%)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
%)
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Drive-ins
that are temporarily closed for various reasons (repairs, remodeling,
relocations, etc.) are not considered closed unless the Company determines
that they are unlikely to reopen within a reasonable
time.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents
percentage change for drive-ins open for a minimum of 15
months.
|
For
fiscal year 2009, the decrease in Partner Drive-In revenues was largely driven
by the decline in same-store sales for existing drive-ins and the refranchising
of 205 Partner Drive-Ins. As a result of the refranchising, Partner
Drive-Ins now comprise 13% of the entire system compared to 20% in fiscal
2008.
During
fiscal year 2009, same-store sales at Partner Drive-Ins declined 6.4%, as
compared to the 4.3% decrease for the system. To counteract
this decline, the Company implemented initiatives designed to provide a unique
and high quality customer service experience with the goal of improving
same-store sales. These initiatives include restructuring the Partner Drive-In
organization, simplifying incentive compensation plans for store-level
management, implementing a customer service satisfaction measurement tool, and
implementing a more effective pricing tool at the drive-in level. These efforts
are expected to have a positive impact on Partner Drive-In sales going
forward.
During
fiscal year 2008, Partner Drive-In sales increased 3.8%. The increase
was comprised of sales from newly constructed drive-ins and acquired drive-ins,
offset by the decrease in sales from lower same-store sales.
The
following table reflects the growth in franchise income (franchise royalties and
franchise fees) as well as franchise sales, average unit volumes and the number
of Franchise Drive-Ins. While we do not record Franchise Drive-In
sales as revenues, we believe this information is important in understanding our
financial performance since these sales are the basis on which we calculate and
record franchise royalties. This information is also indicative of
the financial health of our franchisees.
|
Franchise
Information
|
|
|
($
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Franchise
fees and royalties
(1)
|
|
$
|
131,712
|
|
|
$
|
127,111
|
|
|
$
|
115,626
|
|
|
Percentage
increase
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
Drive-Ins in operation
(2)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
at beginning of period
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
2,689
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
|
Opened
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
Acquired
from (sold to) Company, net
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
Closed
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
Total
at end of period
|
|
|
3,069
|
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
2,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
Drive-In sales
|
|
$
|
3,269,930
|
|
|
$
|
3,139,996
|
|
|
$
|
2,961,168
|
|
|
Percentage
increase
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective
royalty rate
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
|
|
3.88
|
%
|
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
sales per Franchise Drive-In
|
|
$
|
1,122
|
|
|
$
|
1,154
|
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in same-store sales
(3)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
%)
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
See
Revenue Recognition
Related to Franchise Fees and Royalties
in the
Critical Accounting Policies
and Estimates
section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
|
(2)
|
Drive-ins
that are temporarily closed for various reasons (repairs, remodeling,
relocations, etc.) are not considered closed unless the Company determines
that they are unlikely to reopen within a reasonable
time.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents
percentage change for drive-ins open for a minimum of 15
months.
|
Franchise
royalties experienced a 4.1% increase related primarily to royalties from new
and refranchised drive-ins. This increase was offset by the impact of
the decline in same-store sales at Franchise Drive-Ins.
Franchisees
opened 130 new drive-ins in fiscal year 2009, down from 140 new drive-ins in
fiscal year 2008. However, franchisee investment in existing drive-ins remained
strong during fiscal year 2009, including the relocation or rebuild of 46
drive-ins (versus 64 in the prior year) and the retrofit of 337 drive-ins
(versus 800 in fiscal year 2008). Franchise fees decreased 3.1% to
$5.0 million as a result of fewer Franchise Drive-In openings, in addition to a
decline in fees associated with the termination of area development
agreements.
The
Company recognized a $13.2 million gain from the refranchising of 205 Partner
Drive-Ins during fiscal year 2009. We retained a minority ownership
interest in the operations of 88 of the refranchised drive-ins.
Other
income increased 90.4% to $6.5 million in fiscal year 2009 from $3.4 million in
fiscal year 2008. The increase relates primarily from rental revenue
on refranchised drive-ins in which the Company retained ownership of real
estate.
Operating
Expenses
.
The following
table presents the overall costs of drive-in operations as a percentage of
Partner Drive-In sales. Minority interest in earnings of Partner
Drive-Ins is included as a part of cost of sales, in the table below, since it
is directly related to Partner Drive-In operations.
|
Restaurant-Level
Margins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended August 31,
|
|
|
Percentage
points Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Costs
and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-Ins:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food
and packaging
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|
|
26.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
Payroll
and other employee benefits
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
Minority
interest in earnings of Partner Drive-Ins
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
Other
operating expenses
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
84.6
|
%
|
|
|
81.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
points
Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Costs
and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-Ins:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food
and packaging
|
|
|
26.5
|
%
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
Payroll
and other employee benefits
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
Minority
interest in earnings of Partner Drive-Ins
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
Other
operating expenses
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
81.8
|
%
|
|
|
80.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Restaurant-level
margins declined overall in fiscal year 2009 as a result of higher commodity
prices, higher labor costs driven by minimum wage increases and the
de-leveraging impact of lower same-store sales. These negative
impacts were offset by the decline in minority partners’ share of earnings
reflecting the margin pressures described above. During the year, the pressure
on commodity costs began to subside and turned favorable in the fourth
quarter. Looking forward, the Company expects the commodity costs to
be favorable in fiscal year 2010. However, the minimum wage increase
that was effective in July 2009 will continue to pressure labor
costs.
Selling,
General and Administrative (“SG&A”)
.
SG&A
expenses increased 3.6% to $63.4 million during fiscal year 2009 and 4.2% to
$61.2 million during fiscal year 2008 reflecting, in part, ongoing efforts to
manage expenses with slowing revenue growth. Salary and health
insurance increases were the primary contributor to the increase for fiscal year
2009. Stock-based compensation is included in SG&A, and, as of
August 31, 2009, total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to
unvested stock-based arrangements was $12.2 million and is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years. See Note 1
and Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in
this Form 10-K for additional information regarding our stock-based
compensation.
Depreciation
and Amortization
.
Depreciation and
amortization expense decreased 5.1% to $48.1 million in fiscal year 2009
primarily as a result of refranchising Partner
Drive-Ins. Depreciation and amortization expense increased 12.3% to
$50.7 million in fiscal year 2008 primarily as a result of additional capital
expenditures for newly-constructed Partner Drive-Ins, the retrofit and
relocation of existing Partner Drive-Ins and the acquisition of Franchise
Drive-Ins. Capital expenditures during fiscal year 2009 were $36.1
million. For fiscal year 2010, capital expenditures are expected to
be approximately $30 to $40 million.
Provision
for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
.
We assess
drive-in assets for impairment on a quarterly basis under the guidelines of SFAS
144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets.” Based on the Company’s analysis, we recorded a provision of
$11.2 million in fiscal year 2009 to reduce the carrying cost
of the related operating assets to
an estimated fair value. This provision was attributable to the
declining trend in Partner Drive-Ins sales and profits that occurred throughout
fiscal year 2009. We continue to perform quarterly analyses of certain
underperforming drive-ins. It is reasonably possible that the estimate of future
cash flows associated with these drive-ins could change in the future resulting
in the need to write-down assets associated with one or more of these drive-ins
to fair value. While it is impossible to predict if future
write-downs will occur, we do not believe that future write-downs will impede
our ability to grow earnings.
Interest
Expense and Other Expense, Net
.
Net interest
expense decreased $5.9 million to $42.0 million in fiscal year 2009 and
increased $3.5 million to $47.9 million in fiscal year 2008. The
primary cause for the decrease in fiscal year 2009 is the $6.4 million gain from
the early extinguishment of debt that resulted from purchasing $25.0 million of
the Company’s fixed rate notes at a discount. Excluding the gain, the
decrease in net interest expense relates to the reduction in debt due to
scheduled amortization payments on our fixed rate notes and a declining rate on
our variable rate notes. The increase in fiscal year 2008 is the
result of interest on increased borrowings primarily used to fund share
repurchases earlier in the year and drive-in acquisitions from
franchisees.
Income
Taxes
. The provision for income taxes decreased for fiscal
year 2009 with an effective federal and state tax rate of 38.4% compared with
37.4% in fiscal year 2008 and 36.4% in fiscal year 2007. The higher rate in
fiscal year 2009 related to an increase in the valuation allowance of state net
operating losses offset by a reduction in the liability for unrecognized tax
benefits. Our tax rate may continue to vary significantly from
quarter to quarter depending on the timing of option exercises and dispositions
by option-holders, changes to uncertain tax positions and as circumstances on
individual tax matters change.
Financial
Position
During
fiscal year 2009, current assets increased 103.3% to $202.1 million compared to
$99.4 million as of the end of fiscal year 2008. Cash balances
increased by $93.3 million primarily as a result of refranchising Partner
Drive-Ins and advances under the Company’s variable funding notes. During fiscal
year 2009, noncurrent assets decreased 12.2% to $646.9 million compared to
$736.9 million as of the end of fiscal year 2008. The decrease was
primarily the result of a $62.3 million reduction of net property and equipment
and a decrease of $29.5 million in goodwill, resulting from depreciation and the
refranchising of Partner Drive-Ins.
Total
liabilities decreased $47.1 million or 5.2% during fiscal year 2009 compared to
fiscal year 2008 primarily due to a $59.9 million decrease in long-term debt
which resulted from payments on the Company’s fixed rate notes.
Stockholders’
deficit decreased $59.8 million or 93.3% during fiscal year
2009. Earnings of $49.4 million, along with $10.4 million for the
combination of stock compensation and the proceeds and related tax decrement
from the exercise of stock options, decreased the stockholders’
deficit.
Liquidity
and Sources of Capital
Operating
Cash Flows
.
Net cash
provided by operating was $88.7 million in fiscal year 2009 as compared to
$127.1 million in fiscal year 2008. This decrease generally resulted
from a decrease in operating results as reflected by the decrease in net
income.
Investing
Cash Flows.
Net cash provided by
investing activities was $51.5 million in fiscal year 2009 as compared to net
cash used in investing activities of $107.1 million in fiscal year
2008. The purchase of property and equipment was more than offset by
the proceeds from the disposition of Partner Drive-In assets due to
refranchising. During fiscal year 2009, we opened 11 newly constructed Partner
Drive-Ins and sold 205 drive-ins to franchisees. The following table sets forth
the components of our investments in capital additions for fiscal year 2009 (in
millions):
|
New
Partner Drive-Ins, including drive-ins under construction
|
|
$
|
18.6
|
|
|
Retrofits,
drive-thru additions and LED signs in existing drive-ins
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
Rebuilds,
relocations and remodels of existing drive-ins
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
Replacement
equipment for existing drive-ins and other
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
Total
investing cash flows for capital additions
|
|
$
|
36.1
|
|
During
fiscal year 2009, we purchased the real estate for nine of the 11 newly
constructed drive-ins.
Financing
Cash Flows.
Net cash used in
financing activities was $46.9 million in fiscal year 2009 as compared to $1.2
million in fiscal year 2008. The increase in cash used for financing
activities in fiscal year 2009 primarily relates to the net repayment of
long-term debt compared to net borrowings in fiscal year 2008. The
Company has a securitized financing facility of Variable Funding Notes that
provides for the issuance of up to $200.0 million in borrowings and certain
other credit instruments, including letters of credit. As of August
31, 2009, our outstanding balance under the Variable Funding Notes totaled
$187.3 million at an effective borrowing rate of 1.4%, as well as $0.3 million
in outstanding letters of credit. During fiscal year 2009, upon
request of the Company to draw down the remaining $12.3 million in Variable
Funding Notes from one of the lenders, the lender, which had previously filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, notified the Company that it could not meet its
obligation. The Company no longer considers the $12.3 million to be
available.
Despite
recent challenges with Partner Drive-In operations, operating cash flows remain
healthy, and we believe that cash flows from operations, along with existing
cash balances, will be adequate for mandatory repayment of any long-term debt
and funding of planned capital expenditures in fiscal year 2010. See
Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information regarding our long-term debt.
Our
variable and fixed rate notes are subject to a series of covenants and
restrictions customary for transactions of this type, including (i) required
actions to better secure collateral upon the occurrence of certain
performance-related events, (ii) application of certain disposition proceeds as
note prepayments after a set time is allowed for reinvestment, (iii) maintenance
of specified reserve accounts, (iv) maintenance of certain debt service coverage
ratios, (v) optional and mandatory prepayments upon change in control, (vi)
indemnification payments for defective or ineffective collateral, and (vii)
covenants relating to recordkeeping, access to information and similar
matters. The notes are also subject to customary rapid amortization
events and events of default. Although management does not anticipate
an event of default or any other event of noncompliance with the provisions of
the debt, if such an event occurred, the unpaid amounts outstanding could become
immediately due and payable. See Note 1 –
Restricted Cash
of the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding
restrictions on cash.
We plan
capital expenditures of approximately $30 to $40 million in fiscal year 2010.
These capital expenditures primarily relate to the development of additional
Partner Drive-Ins, retrofit of existing Partner Drive-Ins and other drive-in
level expenditures. We expect to fund these capital expenditures through cash
flow from operations as well as cash on hand.
As of
August 31, 2009, our unrestricted cash balance of $137.6 million reflected the
impact of the cash generated from operating activities, borrowing activity,
refranchising, and capital expenditures mentioned above. We believe
that existing cash and funds generated from operations, as well as borrowings
under the Variable Funding Notes, will meet our needs for the foreseeable
future.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The
Company has obligations for guarantees on certain franchisee loans and lease
agreements. See Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information about these guarantees. Other than such guarantees and
various operating leases, which are disclosed more fully in “Contractual
Obligations and Commitments” below and Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements, the Company has no other material off-balance sheet
arrangements.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
In the
normal course of business, Sonic enters into purchase contracts, lease
agreements and borrowing arrangements. Our commitments and
obligations as of August 31, 2009 are summarized in the following
table:
|
Payments
Due by Period
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than
1
Year
|
|
|
1
– 3 Years
|
|
|
3
– 5 Years
|
|
|
More
than 5 Years
|
|
|
Contractual
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt
(1)
|
|
$
|
777,269
|
|
|
$
|
80,789
|
|
|
$
|
204,162
|
|
|
$
|
492,235
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
Capital
leases
|
|
|
55,375
|
|
|
|
5,861
|
|
|
|
11,174
|
|
|
|
10,849
|
|
|
|
27,491
|
|
|
Operating
leases
|
|
|
189,335
|
|
|
|
11,909
|
|
|
|
23,198
|
|
|
|
22,206
|
|
|
|
132,022
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,021,979
|
|
|
$
|
98,559
|
|
|
$
|
238,534
|
|
|
$
|
525,290
|
|
|
$
|
159,596
|
|
|
(1)
|
The
fixed-rate interest payments included in the table above assume that the
related notes will be outstanding for the expected six-year term, and all
other fixed-rate notes will be held to maturity. Interest
payments associated with variable-rate debt have not been included in the
table. Assuming the amounts outstanding under the variable-rate
notes as of August 31, 2009 are held to maturity, and utilizing interest
rates in effect at August 31, 2009, the interest payments will be
approximately $3 million on an annual basis through December
2013.
|
Impact
of Inflation
We have
experienced impact from inflation. Inflation has caused increased food, labor
and benefits costs and has increased our operating expenses. To the extent
permitted by competition, increased costs are recovered through a combination of
menu price increases and reviewing, then implementing, alternative products or
processes, or by implementing other cost reduction procedures.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this document contain information that is pertinent to management's
discussion and analysis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to use its
judgment to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
These assumptions and estimates could have a material effect on our financial
statements. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an ongoing
basis using historical experience and various other factors that are believed to
be relevant under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We
annually review our financial reporting and disclosure practices and accounting
policies to ensure that our financial reporting and disclosures provide accurate
and transparent information relative to the current economic and business
environment. We believe that of our significant accounting policies
(see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), the following
policies involve a higher degree of risk, judgment and/or
complexity.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
.
We
review Partner Drive-In assets for impairment when events or circumstances
indicate they might be impaired. We test for impairment using historical cash
flows and other relevant facts and circumstances as the primary basis for our
estimates of future cash flows. This process requires the use of
estimates and assumptions, which are subject to a high degree of judgment. These
impairment tests require us to estimate fair values of our drive-ins by making
assumptions regarding future cash flows and other factors. During
fiscal year 2009, we reviewed Partner Drive-Ins and other long-lived assets with
combined carrying amounts of $52 million in property, equipment and capital
leases for possible impairment, and our cash flow assumptions resulted in
impairment charges totaling $11.2 million to write down certain assets to their
estimated fair value.
We assess
the recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets related to our brand
and drive-ins at least annually and more frequently if events or changes in
circumstances occur indicating that the carrying amount of the asset may not be
recoverable. Goodwill impairment testing first requires a comparison of the fair
value of each reporting unit to the carrying value. We estimate fair value based
on a comparison of two approaches: discounted cash flow analyses and a market
multiple approach. The discounted estimates of future cash flows include
significant management assumptions such as revenue growth rates, operating
margins, weighted average cost of capital, and future economic and market
conditions. In addition, the market multiple approach includes significant
assumptions such as the use of recent historical market multiples to estimate
future market pricing. These assumptions are significant factors in
calculating the value of the reporting units and can be affected by changes in
consumer demand, commodity
pricing, labor and other operating costs, our cost of capital and our ability to
identify buyers in the market. If the carrying value of the reporting
unit exceeds fair value, goodwill is considered impaired. The amount of the
impairment is the difference between the carrying value of the goodwill and the
“implied” fair value, which is calculated as if the reporting unit had just been
acquired and accounted for as a business combination.
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, we performed our annual assessment of
recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets and determined that no
impairment was indicated. As of the 2009 impairment testing date, the
fair value of the Partner Drive-In reporting unit exceeded the carrying value by
approximately 15%. The carrying value of goodwill as of August 31, 2009, was
$76.3 million, all of which was allocated to the Partner Drive-In reporting
unit. If cash flows generated by our Partner Drive-Ins were to decline
significantly in the future or there were negative revisions to key assumptions,
we may be required to record impairment charges to reduce the carrying amount of
goodwill.
Ownership
Program
.
Our
drive-in philosophy stresses an ownership relationship with supervisors and
drive-in managers. Most supervisors and managers of Partner Drive-Ins
own an equity interest in the drive-in, which is financed by third
parties. Supervisors and managers are neither employees of Sonic nor
of the drive-in in which they have an ownership interest.
The
minority ownership interests in Partner Drive-Ins of the managers and
supervisors are recorded as a minority interest liability on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets, and their share of the drive-in earnings is reflected as
minority interest in earnings of Partner Drive-Ins in the costs and expenses
section of the Consolidated Statements of Income. The ownership
agreements contain provisions that give Sonic the right, but not the obligation,
to purchase the minority interest of the supervisor or manager in a
drive-in. The amount of the investment made by a partner and the
amount of the buy-out are based on a number of factors, including primarily the
drive-in’s financial performance for the preceding 12 months, and are intended
to approximate the fair value of a minority interest in the
drive-in.
The
Company acquires and sells minority interests in Partner Drive-Ins from time to
time as managers and supervisors buy out and buy in to the partnerships or
limited liability companies. If the purchase price of a minority
interest that we acquire exceeds the net book value of the assets underlying the
partnership interest, the excess is recorded as goodwill. The
acquisition of a minority interest for less than book value is recorded as a
reduction in purchased goodwill. When the Company sells a minority
interest, the sales price is typically in excess of the book value of the
partnership interest, and the difference is recorded as a reduction of
goodwill. If the book value exceeds the sales price, the excess is
recorded as goodwill. In either case, no gain or loss is recognized
on the sale of the minority ownership interest. Goodwill created as a
result of the acquisition of minority interests in Partner Drive-Ins is not
amortized but is tested annually for impairment under the provisions of SFAS
142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”
Revenue
Recognition Related to Franchise Fees and Royalties
. Initial
franchise fees are recognized in income when we have substantially performed or
satisfied all material services or conditions relating to the sale of the
franchise and the fees are nonrefundable. Area development fees are
nonrefundable and are recognized in income on a pro-rata basis when the
conditions for revenue recognition under the individual area development
agreements are met. Both initial franchise fees and area development fees are
generally recognized upon the opening of a Franchise Drive-In or upon
termination of the agreement between Sonic and the franchisee.
Our
franchisees are required under the provisions of the license agreements to pay
royalties to Sonic each month based on a percentage of actual net
sales. However, the royalty payments and supporting financial
statements are not due until the following month under the terms of our license
agreements. As a result, we accrue royalty revenue in the month
earned based on estimates of Franchise Drive-Ins sales. These
estimates are based on projections of average unit volume growth at Franchise
Drive-Ins collected from a majority of Franchise Drive-Ins.
Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation
.
We account for
stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS
123R”). We estimate the fair value of options granted using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model along with the assumptions shown in Note 13
of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form
10-K. The assumptions used in computing the fair value of share-based
payments reflect our best estimates, but involve uncertainties relating to
market and other conditions, many of which are outside of our
control. We estimate expected volatility based on historical daily
price changes of the Company’s stock for a period equal to the current expected
term of the options. The expected option term is the number of years
the Company estimates that options will be outstanding prior to exercise
considering vesting schedules and
our historical exercise patterns. If other assumptions or estimates
had been used, the stock-based compensation expense that was recorded during
fiscal year 2009 could have been materially different. Furthermore,
if different assumptions are used in future periods, stock-based compensation
expense could be materially impacted.
Income
Taxes
. We estimate certain components of our provision for
income taxes. These estimates include, among other items,
depreciation and amortization expense allowable for tax purposes, allowable tax
credits for items such as wages paid to certain employees, effective rates for
state and local income taxes and the tax deductibility of certain other
items.
We
account for uncertain tax positions under the provisions of Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes" (“FIN 48”) which sets out criteria for the use of judgment in assessing
the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items. Although we believe we
have adequately accounted for our uncertain tax positions, from time to time,
audits result in proposed assessments where the ultimate resolution may result
in us owing additional taxes. We adjust our uncertain tax positions in light of
changing facts and circumstances, such as the completion of a tax audit,
expiration of a statute of limitations, the refinement of an estimate, and
penalty and interest accruals associated with uncertain tax positions until they
are resolved. We believe that our tax positions comply with applicable tax law
and that we have adequately provided for these matters. However, to the extent
that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts
recorded, such differences will impact the provision for income taxes in the
period in which such determination is made.
Our
estimates are based on the best available information at the time that we
prepare the provision, including legislative and judicial
developments. We generally file our annual income tax returns several
months after our fiscal year end. Income tax returns are subject to
audit by federal, state and local governments, typically several years after the
returns are filed. These returns could be subject to material
adjustments or differing interpretations of the tax laws. Adjustments
to these estimates or returns can result in significant variability in the tax
rate from period to period.
Leases
.
Certain Partner
Drive-Ins lease land and buildings from third parties. Rent expense
for operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected
lease term, including cancelable option periods when it is deemed to be
reasonably assured that we would incur an economic penalty for not exercising
the options. Judgment is required to determine options expected to be
exercised. Certain of our leases have provisions for rent holidays
and/or escalations in payments over the base lease term, as well as renewal
periods. The effects of the rent holidays and escalations are
reflected in rent expense on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term,
including cancelable option periods when appropriate. The lease term
commences on the date when we have the right to control the use of lease
property, which can occur before rent payments are due under the terms of the
lease. Contingent rent is generally based on sales levels and is
accrued at the point in time we determine that it is probable that such sales
levels will be achieved.
It
em
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Sonic’s
use of debt directly exposes the Company to interest rate
risk. Floating rate debt, where the interest rate fluctuates
periodically, exposes the Company to short-term changes in market interest
rates. Fixed rate debt, where the interest rate is fixed over the
life of the instrument, exposes the Company to changes in market interest rates
reflected in the fair value of the debt and to the risk that the Company may
need to refinance maturing debt with new debt at a higher rate. Sonic
is also exposed to market risk from changes in commodity
prices. Sonic does not utilize financial instruments for trading
purposes. Sonic manages its debt portfolio to achieve an overall
desired position of fixed and floating rates and may employ interest rate swaps
as a tool to achieve that goal in the future.
Interest
Rate Risk.
Our exposure to interest rate risk at August 31,
2009 is primarily based on the fixed rate notes with an effective rate of 5.7%,
before amortization of debt-related costs. At August 31, 2009, the
fair value of the fixed rate notes was estimated at $473.3
million versus carrying
value of $511.9 million (including accrued interest). The difference
between fair value and carrying value is attributable to interest rate decreases
subsequent to when the debt was originally issued, more than offset by the
increase in credit spreads required by issuers of similar debt instruments in
the current market. Should interest rates and/or credit spreads
increase or decrease by one percentage point, the estimated fair value of the
fixed rate notes would decrease by approximately $11.8
million or increase by
approximately $11.4 million, respectively. The fair value estimate
required significant assumptions by management as there are few, if any,
securitized loan transactions occurring in the current
market. Management used market information available for public debt
transactions for companies with ratings that are close to or lower than ratings
for the Company (without consideration for the third-party credit
enhancement). Management believes this fair value is a reasonable
estimate with the information that is available. The difference
between fair value and carrying value is
attributable to interest rate
decreases subsequent to when the debt was originally issued which is more than
offset by the increase in credit spreads required by issuers of similar debt
instruments in the current market.
The
variable funding notes outstanding at August 31, 2009 totaled $187.3
million, with a variable
rate of 1.4%. The annual impact on our results of operations of a
one-point interest rate change for the balance outstanding at year-end would be
approximately $1.9
million before
tax. At August 31, 2009, the fair value of the variable funding notes
was estimated at $159.3 million versus carrying value of $187.3 million
(including accrued interest). Should credit spreads increase or
decrease by one percentage point, the estimated fair value of the variable
funding notes would decrease by approximately $5.2 million or increase by
approximately $5.1 million, respectively. The Company used similar
assumptions to value the variable funding notes as were used for the fixed rate
notes. The difference between fair value and carrying value is
attributable to the increase in credit spreads required by issuers of similar
debt instruments in the current market.
We have
made certain loans to our franchisees totaling $9
.5
million as of August 31,
2009. The interest rates on these notes are generally between 5.0%
and 10.5%. We believe the carrying amount of these notes approximates
their fair value.
Commodity
Price Risk
.
The Company and
its franchisees purchase certain commodities such as beef, potatoes, chicken and
dairy products. These commodities are generally purchased based upon
market prices established with vendors. These purchase arrangements may contain
contractual features that limit the price paid by establishing price floors or
caps; however, we have not made any long-term commitments to purchase any
minimum quantities under these arrangements. We do not use financial instruments
to hedge commodity prices because these purchase agreements help control the
ultimate cost.
This
market risk discussion contains forward-looking statements. Actual
results may differ materially from this discussion based upon general market
conditions and changes in financial markets.
It
em
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The
Company has included the financial statements and supplementary financial
information required by this item immediately following Part IV of this report
and hereby incorporates by reference the relevant portions of those statements
and information into this Item 8.
It
em
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
It
em
9A. Controls and Procedures
As of the
end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management,
including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures were effective. There were no significant changes in
the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.
Management's
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The
management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal
control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s
management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair
presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no
matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those
systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
The
Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2009. In making
this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework. Based on our
assessment,
we believe that, as of August 31, 2009, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
The
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the
financial statements included in the annual report has issued an attestation
report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. This report
appears on the following page.
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board
of Directors and Stockholders of Sonic Corp.
We have
audited Sonic Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 31,
2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(the COSO criteria). Sonic Corp.’s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness
of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, Sonic Corp. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2009, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Sonic Corp.
as of August 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended August 31, 2009 of Sonic Corp. and our report dated October 29,
2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma
October
29, 2009
It
em
9B. Other Information
No
information was required to be disclosed in a Form 8-K during the Company’s
fourth quarter of its 2009 fiscal year which was not reported.
PART IV
It
em
15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Financial
Statements
The
following consolidated financial statements of the Company appear immediately
following this Item 15:
|
|
Pages
|
|
|
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-1
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at August 31, 2009 and 2008
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income for each of the three years in the period ended
August 31, 2009
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for each of the three years in the
period ended August 31, 2009
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended
August 31, 2009
|
F-6
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-8
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
The
Company has included the following schedule immediately following this Item
15:
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule
II
|
-
|
Valuation
and Qualifying Accounts
|
F-34
|
The
Company has omitted all other schedules because the conditions requiring their
filing do not exist or because the required information appears in Sonic’s
Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes to those
statements.
Exhibits
The
Company has filed the exhibits listed below with this report. The
Company has marked all management contracts and compensatory plans or
arrangements with an asterisk (*).
3.01. Certificate
of Incorporation of the Company, which the Company hereby incorporates by
reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement No.
33-37158 filed on October 3, 1990.
3.02. Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, March 4, 1996,
which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 3.05 to the
Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2000.
3.03. Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, January 22, 2002,
which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 3.06 to the
Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002.
3.04.
Certificate of Amendment
of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, January 31, 2006
, which
the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 3.04 to the Company’s
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006
.
3.05. Bylaws
of the Company, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit
3.2 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-37158 filed on
October 3, 1990.
3.06. Certificate
of Designations of Series A Junior Preferred Stock, which the Company hereby
incorporates by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on
June 17, 1997.
4.01. Specimen
Certificate for Common Stock, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference
from Exhibit 4.01 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August
31, 1999.
10.01. Form
of Sonic Industries LLC, successor to Sonic Industries Inc., License Agreement
(the Number 4.2 License Agreement and Number 5.1 License Agreement), which the
Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.03 to the Company’s
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1994.
10.02. Form
of Sonic Industries LLC, successor to Sonic Industries Inc., License Agreement
(the Number 6 License Agreement), which the Company hereby incorporates by
reference from Exhibit 10.04 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 1994.
10.03. Form
of Sonic Industries LLC, successor to Sonic Industries Inc., License Agreement
(the Number 6A License Agreement), which the Company hereby incorporates by
reference from Exhibit 10.05 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 1998.
10.04. Form
of Sonic Industries LLC, successor to Sonic Industries Inc., License Agreement
(the Number 5.2 License Agreement), which the Company hereby incorporates by
reference from Exhibit 10.06 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 1998.
10.05. Form
of Sonic Industries LLC License Agreement (the Number 4.4/5.4 License
Agreement), which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit No.
10.08 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31,
2007.
10.06. Form
of Sonic Industries LLC License Agreement (the Number 5.5 License Agreement),
which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit No. 10.09 to the
Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007.
10.07. Form
of Sonic Industries LLC License Agreement (the Number 7 License Agreement),
which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit No. 10.10 to the
Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007.
10.08. Form
of Sonic Industries LLC, successor to Sonic Industries Inc., Area Development
Agreement (the Number 6A Area Development Agreement), which the Company hereby
incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.05 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended August 31, 1995.
10.09. Form
of Sonic Industries LLC Area Development Agreement (the Number 7 Area
Development Agreement), which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from
Exhibit No. 10.13 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August
31, 2007.
10.10. Form
of Sonic Industries Services Inc. Sign Lease Agreement, which the Company hereby
incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form S-1
Registration Statement No. 33-37158.
10.11. Form
of General Partnership Agreement, Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement
and Master Agreement, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from
Exhibit 10.09 to the Company’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ended August 31,
2003.
10.12. 1991
Sonic Corp. Stock Option Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates by
reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement No.
33-37158.*
10.13. 1991
Sonic Corp. Stock Purchase Plan, amended and restated effective April 2, 2008,
which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.17 to the
Company’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ended August 31, 2008.*
10.14. 1991
Sonic Corp. Directors’ Stock Option Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates
by reference from Exhibit 10.08 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 1991.*
10.15. Sonic
Corp. Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates by
reference from Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement No.
33-37158.*
10.16. Net
Revenue Incentive Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from
Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement No.
33-37158.*
10.17. Form
of Indemnification Agreement for Directors, which the Company hereby
incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form S-1
Registration Statement No. 33-37158.*
10.18. Form
of Indemnification Agreement for Officers, which the Company hereby incorporates
by reference from Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 1995.*
10.19. Employment
Agreement with J. Clifford Hudson dated December 15, 2008, which the Company
hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.01 to the Company’s Form 10-Q
for the second fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2009.*
10.20. Employment
Agreement with W. Scott McLain dated December 15, 2008, which the Company hereby
incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.05 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the
second fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2009.*
10.21. Employment
Agreement with Omar Janjua dated October 15, 2009.*
10.22. Employment
Agreement with Stephen C. Vaughan dated December 15, 2008, which the Company
hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.09 to the Company’s Form 10-Q
for the second fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2009.*
10.23.
Employment Agreement with
Paige S. Bass dated
December 15, 2008, which the Company hereby
incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.02 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the
second fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2009.*
10.24. Employment
Agreement with Carolyn Cummins, which the Company hereby incorporates by
reference from Exhibit 10.03 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the second fiscal
quarter ended February 28, 2009.*
10.25. Employment
Agreement with Terry D. Harryman dated December 15, 2008, which the Company
hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.04 to the Company’s Form 10-Q
for the second fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2009.*
10.26.
Employment Agreement with
Claudia San Pedro dated
December 15, 2008, which the Company hereby
incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.06 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the
second fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2009.*
10.27. Employment
Agreement with Sharon T. Strickland dated December 15, 2008,, which the Company
hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.08 to the Company’s Form 10-Q
for the second fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2009.*
10.28. 2001
Sonic Corp. Stock Option Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates by
reference from Exhibit No. 10.32 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2001.*
10.29. 2001
Sonic Corp. Directors’ Stock Option Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates
by reference from Exhibit No. 10.33 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2001.*
10.30. Sonic
Corp. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan which the Company hereby incorporates by
reference from Exhibit No. 10.31 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2006.*
21.01. Subsidiaries
of the Company.
23.01. Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.01. Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to S.E.C. Rule 13a-14.
31.02. Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to S.E.C. Rule 13a-14.
32.01. Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.02. Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
99.01 Base
Indenture dated December 20, 2006 among Sonic Capital LLC and certain other
indirect subsidiaries of the Company, and Citibank, N.A. as Trustee and
Securities Intermediary, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from
Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2006.
99.02 Supplemental
Indenture dated December 20, 2006 among Sonic Capital LLC and certain other
indirect subsidiaries of the Company, and Citibank, N.A. as Trustee and the
Series 2006-1 Securities Intermediary, which the Company hereby incorporates by
reference from Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 27,
2006.
99.03 Class
A-1 Note Purchase Agreement dated December 20, 2006 among Sonic Capital LLC and
certain other indirect subsidiaries of the Company, certain private conduit
investors, financial institutions and funding agents, Bank of America, N.A. as
provider of letters of credit, and Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as a swing line
lender and as Administrative Agent, which the Company hereby incorporates by
reference from Exhibit 99.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 27,
2006.
99.04 Guarantee
and Collateral Support Agreement dated December 20, 2006 made by Sonic
Industries LLC, as Guarantor in favor of Citibank N.A. as Trustee, which the
Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 99.4 to the Company’s Form
8-K filed on December 27, 2006.
99.05 Parent
Company Support Agreement dated December 20, 2006 made by Sonic Corp. in favor
of Citibank N.A., as Trustee, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference
from Exhibit 99.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on December 27,
2006.