CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
ASSETS
|
|
(Unaudited)
November
30,
2008
|
|
|
August
31,
2008
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
45,863
|
|
|
$
|
44,266
|
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
16,875
|
|
|
|
14,934
|
|
|
Accounts
and notes receivable, net
|
|
|
24,218
|
|
|
|
29,838
|
|
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
9,887
|
|
|
|
10,389
|
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
96,843
|
|
|
|
99,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
equipment and capital leases
|
|
|
841,409
|
|
|
|
844,345
|
|
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(268,484
|
)
|
|
|
(258,100
|
)
|
|
Property,
equipment and capital leases, net
|
|
|
572,925
|
|
|
|
586,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill,
net
|
|
|
105,600
|
|
|
|
105,762
|
|
|
Trademarks,
trade names and other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
12,255
|
|
|
|
12,418
|
|
|
Noncurrent
restricted cash
|
|
|
10,922
|
|
|
|
11,192
|
|
|
Investment
in direct financing leases and noncurrent portion of notes
receivable
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
|
|
4,764
|
|
|
Debt
origination costs and other assets, net
|
|
|
15,386
|
|
|
|
16,504
|
|
|
Intangibles
and other assets, net
|
|
|
148,703
|
|
|
|
150,640
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
818,471
|
|
|
$
|
836,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
17,692
|
|
|
$
|
20,762
|
|
|
Deposits
from franchisees
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
32,836
|
|
|
|
46,200
|
|
|
Income
taxes payable
|
|
|
6,349
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
Obligations
under capital leases and long-term debt due within one
year
|
|
|
46,591
|
|
|
|
41,351
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
105,877
|
|
|
|
112,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations
under capital leases due after one year
|
|
|
34,404
|
|
|
|
34,503
|
|
|
Long-term
debt due after one year
|
|
|
699,162
|
|
|
|
720,953
|
|
|
Other
noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
33,719
|
|
|
|
32,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, par value $.01; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none
outstanding
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Common
stock, par value $.01; 245,000,000 shares authorized; 117,161,982 shares
issued (117,004,879 shares issued at August 31, 2008)
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
Paid-in
capital
|
|
|
211,450
|
|
|
|
209,316
|
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
607,087
|
|
|
|
599,956
|
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(2,032
|
)
|
|
|
(2,191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
817,676
|
|
|
|
808,251
|
|
|
Treasury
stock, at cost; 56,600,080 common shares
|
|
|
(872,367
|
)
|
|
|
(872,367
|
)
|
|
Total
stockholders’ deficit
|
|
|
(54,691
|
)
|
|
|
(64,116
|
)
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
|
|
$
|
818,471
|
|
|
$
|
836,312
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
Three
months ended
November
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-In sales
|
|
$
|
153,047
|
|
|
$
|
159,285
|
|
|
Franchise
Drive-Ins:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
royalties
|
|
|
29,055
|
|
|
|
28,639
|
|
|
Franchise
fees
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,066
|
|
|
|
190,181
|
|
|
Costs
and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-Ins:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food
and packaging
|
|
|
42,424
|
|
|
|
41,078
|
|
|
Payroll
and other employee benefits
|
|
|
49,863
|
|
|
|
49,316
|
|
|
Minority
interest in earnings of Partner Drive-Ins
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
5,296
|
|
|
Other
operating expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization included
below
|
|
|
34,523
|
|
|
|
33,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,635
|
|
|
|
129,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
16,162
|
|
|
|
14,914
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
13,019
|
|
|
|
12,206
|
|
|
Provision
for impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,230
|
|
|
|
156,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from operations
|
|
|
23,836
|
|
|
|
33,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
12,053
|
|
|
|
12,669
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
(689
|
)
|
|
Net
interest expense
|
|
|
11,666
|
|
|
|
11,980
|
|
|
Income
before income taxes
|
|
|
12,170
|
|
|
|
21,907
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
5,039
|
|
|
|
8,324
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
7,131
|
|
|
$
|
13,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income per share – basic
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income per share – diluted
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
Three
months ended
November
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
7,131
|
|
|
$
|
13,583
|
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
13,019
|
|
|
|
12,206
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
1,861
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
Decrease
in operating assets
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
|
|
6,914
|
|
|
Decrease
in operating liabilities
|
|
|
(8,134
|
)
|
|
|
(5,778
|
)
|
|
Total
adjustments
|
|
|
11,194
|
|
|
|
15,801
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
18,325
|
|
|
|
29,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
|
|
(15,113
|
)
|
|
|
(20,988
|
)
|
|
Acquisition
of businesses, net of cash received
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(6,288
|
)
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of assets
|
|
|
14,354
|
|
|
|
3,068
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of minority interests in Partner Drive-Ins
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
Purchases
of minority interests in Partner Drive-Ins
|
|
|
(3,041
|
)
|
|
|
(1,602
|
)
|
|
Other
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,777
|
)
|
|
|
(25,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
on long-term debt
|
|
|
(16,620
|
)
|
|
|
(42,790
|
)
|
|
Proceeds
from long-term borrowings
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
67,000
|
|
|
Purchases
of treasury stock
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(26,674
|
)
|
|
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
(883
|
)
|
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(14,951
|
)
|
|
|
(1,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
44,266
|
|
|
|
25,425
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
45,863
|
|
|
$
|
28,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
to capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
669
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In
thousands, except per share data)
1. Basis
of Presentation
The
unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include all adjustments,
consisting of normal, recurring accruals, which Sonic Corp. (the “Company”)
considers necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the
results of operations for the indicated periods. In certain
situations, these accruals, including franchise royalties, are based on more
limited information at interim reporting dates than at the Company’s fiscal year
end due to the abbreviated reporting period. Actual results may
differ from these estimates. The notes to the condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the
consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended August 31, 2008. The results of operations for the
three months ended November 30, 2008, are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year ending August 31, 2009.
2. Net
Income per Share
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share:
|
|
|
Three
months ended
November
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
7,131
|
|
|
$
|
13,583
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding – basic
|
|
|
60,459
|
|
|
|
60,772
|
|
|
Effect
of dilutive employee stock options
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
2,293
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares – diluted
|
|
|
61,210
|
|
|
|
63,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income per share – basic
|
|
$
|
.12
|
|
|
$
|
.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income per share – diluted
|
|
$
|
.12
|
|
|
$
|
.22
|
|
3. Contingencies
The
Company is involved in various legal proceedings and has certain unresolved
claims pending. Based on the information currently available,
management believes that all claims currently pending are either covered by
insurance or would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business
or financial condition.
The
Company entered into an agreement with Irwin Franchise Capital Corporation
(“Irwin”) in September 2006, pursuant to which existing Sonic franchisees may
qualify with Irwin to finance drive-in retrofit projects. The
agreement originally provided that Sonic will guarantee at least $250 of such
financing, limited to 5% of the aggregate amount of loans, not to exceed
$2,500. In October 2008, the agreement was amended to increase the
aggregate limit to a level not to exceed $3,750. As of November 30,
2008, the total amount guaranteed under the Irwin agreement was
$826. The agreement provides for release of Sonic’s guarantee on
individual loans under the program that meet certain payment history criteria at
the mid-point of each loan’s term. Existing loans under the program
have terms through 2015. In the event of default by a franchisee, the
Company is obligated to pay Irwin the outstanding balances, plus limited
interest and charges up to Sonic’s guarantee limitation. Irwin is
obligated to pursue collections as if Sonic’s guarantee were not in place,
therefore, providing recourse with the franchisee under the
notes. The Company’s liability for this guarantee, which is based on
fair value, is $330 as of November 30, 2008.
The
Company has an agreement with GE Capital Franchise Finance Corporation (“GEC”)
pursuant to which GEC made loans to existing Sonic franchisees who met certain
underwriting criteria set by GEC. Under the terms of the agreement
with GEC, the Company provided a guarantee of 10% of the outstanding balance of
loans from GEC to the Sonic franchisees, limited to a maximum amount of
$5,000. As of November 30, 2008, the total amount guaranteed under
the GEC agreement was $1,498. The Company ceased guaranteeing new
loans under the program during fiscal year 2002 and has not been required to
make any payments under its agreement with GEC. Existing loans
under guarantee will expire through 2012. In the event of default by
a franchisee, the Company has the option to fulfill the franchisee’s obligations
under the note or to become the note holder, which would provide an avenue of
recourse with the franchisee under the notes. Based on the
ending date for this program, no liability is required for these
guarantees.
The
Company has obligations under various lease agreements with third party lessors
related to the real estate for Partner Drive-Ins that was sold to
franchisees. Under these agreements, the Company remains secondarily
liable for the lease payments for which it was responsible as the original
lessee. As of November 30, 2008, the amount remaining under
guaranteed lease obligations for which no liability has been provided totaled
$5,659. In addition, capital lease obligations totaling $1,003 are
still reflected as liabilities as of November 30, 2008 for properties sold to
franchisees. At this time, the Company has no reason to anticipate
any default under the foregoing leases.
Effective
November 30, 2005, the Company extended a note purchase agreement to a bank that
serves to guarantee the repayment of a franchisee loan and also benefits the
franchisee with a lower financing rate. In the event of default by
the franchisee, the Company would purchase the franchisee loan from the bank,
thereby becoming the note holder and providing an avenue of recourse with the
franchisee. As of November 30, 2008, the balance of the loan was
$940.
4. Debt
and Other Comprehensive Income
We
previously disclosed that Moody’s had placed under review for a possible
downgrade the credit rating of our third-party insurance company that provides
credit enhancements in the form of financial guaranties of our fixed and
variable rate note payments. On November 5, 2008, Moody’s downgraded
the insurer’s credit rating to Baa1. We are unable to determine
whether further downgrades by Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s may occur and
what impact this downgrade has had or further downgrades would have on our
insurer’s financial condition. For information regarding the
consequences if the insurance company were to become the subject of insolvency
or similar proceedings, see Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31,
2008.
In August
2006, the Company entered into a forward starting swap agreement with a
financial institution to hedge part of the exposure to changing interest rates
for debt until it was settled in conjunction with financing closed in December
2006. The forward starting swap was designated as a cash flow
hedge. The loss resulting from settlement was recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income and is being amortized to interest expense over the
expected term of the related debt.
The
following table presents the components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
Three
months ended
November
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
$
|
7,131
|
|
|
$
|
13,583
|
|
|
Change
in deferred hedging loss, net of tax
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
7,290
|
|
|
$
|
13,749
|
|
5.
Segment Information
FASB
Statement No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information” (“FAS 131”) establishes annual and interim reporting standards for
an enterprise’s operating segments. Operating segments are generally
defined as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial
information is available as the basis for management to allocate resources and
assess performance.
Based on internal
reporting and management structure, the Company has determined that it has two
reportable segments: Partner Drive-Ins and Franchise Operations. The
Partner Drive-Ins segment consists of the drive-in operations in which the
Company owns a majority interest and derives its revenues from operating
drive-in restaurants. The Franchise Operations segment consists of
franchising activities and derives its revenues from royalties and initial
franchise fees received from franchisees. The accounting policies of
the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies in our most recent Annual Report on Form
10-K. Segment information for total assets and capital expenditures
is not presented as such information is not used in measuring segment
performance or allocating resources between segments.
The
following table presents the revenues and income from operations for each
reportable segment, along with reconciliation to reported revenue and income
from operations:
|
|
|
Three
months ended
|
|
|
|
|
November
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-Ins
|
|
$
|
153,047
|
|
|
$
|
159,285
|
|
|
Franchise
Operations
|
|
|
30,226
|
|
|
|
29,879
|
|
|
Unallocated
revenues
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
184,066
|
|
|
$
|
190,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-Ins
|
|
$
|
22,412
|
|
|
$
|
30,111
|
|
|
Franchise
Operations
|
|
|
30,226
|
|
|
|
29,879
|
|
|
Unallocated
revenues
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
Unallocated
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
(16,162
|
)
|
|
|
(14,914
|
)
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
(13,019
|
)
|
|
|
(12,206
|
)
|
|
Provision
for impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,836
|
|
|
$
|
33,887
|
|
6. Fair
Value Measures
We
adopted FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measures” (“SFAS 157”), for
financial assets and liabilities as of the beginning of fiscal year 2009. SFAS
157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset
or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. SFAS 157 also establishes a fair
value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair
value:
Level 1 —
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities;
Level 2 —
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar
assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and
Level 3 —
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
As of
November 30, 2008, the Company’s financial assets that are measured at fair
value on a recurring basis consisted of $43,949, $16,875 and
$10,922 million of short-term investments (Level 1) recorded in cash and
cash equivalents, current restricted cash and noncurrent resricted cash,
respectively. The Company has no financial liabilities that are required to
be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
In
accordance with SFAS 157-2, the Company continues to evaluate the potential
impact of applying the provisions of SFAS 157 to its non-financial assets and
liabilities beginning in fiscal year 2010.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”
(“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and is effective for
our current fiscal year. If the fair value option is elected,
unrealized gains and losses will be recognized in earnings at each subsequent
reporting date. The Company did not elect to begin reporting any financial
assets or liabilities at fair value upon adoption of SFAS 159; therefore, the
standard did not have any effect on the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
7. Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141(revised 2007), “Business
Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). This standard retains the fundamental
requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of accounting
be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for
each business combination. SFAS 141(R) requires an acquirer to recognize
the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in
the acquiree at their fair values at the acquisition date. Costs incurred by the
acquirer to effect the acquisition are not allocated to the assets acquired or
liabilities assumed, but are recognized separately. SFAS 141(R)
is effective prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning
on or after December 15, 2008, which for us will be business combinations
with an acquisition date beginning on or after September 1, 2009. The
Company is evaluating the impact that SFAS 141(R) will have on its consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment to ARB No. 51” (“SFAS
160”). This standard establishes accounting and reporting standards
for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary and clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an
ownership interest that should be reported as equity in the consolidated
financial statements. SFAS 160 establishes a single method of accounting
for changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result
in deconsolidation and requires a parent to recognize a gain or loss in net
income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160 also requires
consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts
attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest and to disclose,
on the face of the consolidated statement of income, the amounts of consolidated
net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest.
SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008, which for us will be our fiscal year beginning September
1, 2009. The Company is evaluating the impact that SFAS 160 will have
on its consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
In
September 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 08-5, “Issuer’s Accounting for
Liabilities Measured at Fair Value With a Third-Party Credit Enhancement” ("EITF
08-5"). EITF 08-5 provides guidance for measuring liabilities issued with an
attached third-party credit enhancement (such as a guarantee). It clarifies that
the issuer of a liability with a third-party credit enhancement should not
include the effect of the credit enhancement in the fair value measurement of
the liability. EITF 08-5 is effective for the first reporting period beginning
after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact of EITF
08-5 on its consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
|
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Overview
Results
for the first quarter ended November 30, 2008 reflected a number of challenges
including weak consumer sentiment accompanying the general business recession as
well as rising commodity and labor costs. System-side same-store
sales declined during the quarter, and the performance of Partner Drive-Ins
continued to lag behind that of Franchise Drive-Ins. The de-leveraging impact of
lower sales volumes coupled with rising costs also led to lower restaurant and
operating margins during the quarter.
For the
first quarter of fiscal 2009, revenues decreased 3.2%, while operating income
decreased 29.7%. Net income decreased 47.5% during the quarter and
earnings per share decreased 45.5% to $0.12 per diluted share from $0.22 in the
year-earlier period.
The
following table provides information regarding the number of Partner Drive-Ins
and Franchise Drive-Ins in operation as of the end of the periods indicated as
well as the system-wide growth in sales and average unit
volume. System-wide information includes both Partner and Franchise
Drive-In information, which we believe is useful in analyzing the growth of the
brand as well as the Company’s revenues since franchisees pay royalties based on
a percentage of sales.
System-Wide
Performance
($
in thousands)
|
|
|
Three
months ended
November
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Percentage
increase in sales
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System-wide
drive-ins in operation
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
at beginning of period
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
Opened
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Closed
(net of re-openings)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
Total
at end of period
|
|
|
3,505
|
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
sales per drive-in
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in same-store sales
(2)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
%)
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Drive-ins
that are temporarily closed for various reasons (repairs, remodeling,
management changes, etc.) are not considered closed unless the Company
determines that they are unlikely to reopen within a reasonable
time.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents
percentage change for drive-ins open for a minimum of 15
months.
|
System-wide
same-store sales decreased 3.6% during the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 as
a result of decrease in average check and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in
traffic (number of transactions per drive-in).
The
following table provides information regarding drive-in development across the
system. Retrofits represent investments to upgrade the exterior look
of our drive-ins, typically including an upgraded building exterior, new more
energy-efficient lighting, a significantly enhanced patio area, and improved
menu housings.
|
System-Wide
Drive-In Development
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended
November
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
New
drive-ins:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Franchise
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
System-wide
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Rebuilds/relocations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Franchise
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
System-wide
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Retrofits,
including rebuilds/relocations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Franchise
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
System-wide
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Results
of Operations
Revenues
.
The following
table sets forth the components of revenue for the reported periods and the
relative change between the comparable periods.
Revenues
($
in thousands)
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended November 30,
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
Percent
Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-In sales
|
|
$
|
153,047
|
|
|
$
|
159,285
|
|
|
$
|
(
6,238
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
%)
|
|
Franchise
revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
royalties
|
|
|
29,055
|
|
|
|
28,639
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
Franchise
fees
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
%)
|
|
Other
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
(22.0
|
%)
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
$
|
184,066
|
|
|
$
|
190,181
|
|
|
$
|
(
6,115
|
)
|
|
|
(3.2
|
%)
|
The
following table reflects the changes in Partner Drive-In sales, average unit
volumes and comparable sales for Partner Drive-Ins. It also presents
information about the number of Partner Drive-Ins, which is useful in analyzing
the growth of Partner Drive-In sales.
Partner
Drive-In Sales
($
in thousands)
|
|
|
Three
months ended
November
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-In sales
|
|
$
|
153,047
|
|
|
$
|
159,285
|
|
|
Percentage
change
|
|
|
(3.9
|
%)
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drive-ins
in operation
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
at beginning of period
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
Opened
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Acquired
from (sold to) franchisees
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Closed
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Total
at end of period
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
sales per drive-in
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
Percentage
change
|
|
|
(7.0
|
%)
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in same-store sales
(2)
|
|
|
(6.6
|
%)
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Drive-ins
that are temporarily closed for various reasons (repairs, remodeling,
management changes, etc.) are not considered closed unless the Company
determines that they are unlikely to reopen within a reasonable
time.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents
percentage change for drive-ins open for a minimum of 15
months.
|
For the
first fiscal quarter of 2009, Partner Drive-In sales decreased
3.9%. The decrease was largely driven by the decline in same-store
sales for existing drive-ins, which was partially offset by sales from newly
constructed and acquired drive-ins. The Company believes the decline
in performance at Partner Drive-Ins is attributable, at least in part, to
consumer reaction to aggressive price increases taken during fiscal year 2007,
combined with a decline in service. Since the deterioration in
performance became apparent during the third quarter of fiscal year 2008,
several actions have been taken, including an organizational restructure
(management and personnel changes) as well as a simplified incentive
compensation plan, which strengthens the partnership program and places
increased emphasis on customer service. In addition, we implemented a
more strategic approach to pricing. These efforts are expected to
have a positive impact on Partner Drive-In sales.
The
following table reflects the growth in franchise income (franchise royalties and
franchise fees) as well as franchise sales, average unit volumes and the number
of Franchise Drive-Ins. While we do not record Franchise Drive-In
sales as revenues, we believe this information is important in understanding our
financial performance since these sales are the basis on which we calculate and
record franchise royalties. This information is also indicative of
the financial health of our franchisees.
Franchise
Information
($
in thousands)
|
|
|
Three
months ended
November
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Franchise
fees and royalties
(1)
|
|
$
|
30,226
|
|
|
$
|
29,879
|
|
|
Percentage
increase
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
Drive-Ins in operation
(2)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
at beginning of period
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
2,689
|
|
|
Opened
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Acquired
from (sold to) company
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
Closed
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
Total
at end of period
|
|
|
2,825
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise
Drive-In sales
|
|
$
|
757,443
|
|
|
$
|
740,288
|
|
|
Percentage
increase
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective
royalty rate
|
|
|
3.84
|
%
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
sales per Franchise Drive-In
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in same-store sales
(3)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
%)
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
See
Revenue Recognition
Related to Franchise Fees and Royalties
in the
Critical Accounting Policies
and Estimates
section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31,
2008.
|
|
(2)
|
Drive-ins
that are temporarily closed for various reasons (repairs, remodeling,
management changes, etc.) are not considered closed unless the Company
determines that they are unlikely to reopen within a reasonable
time.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents
percentage change for drive-ins open for a minimum of 15
months.
|
Franchise
royalties experienced a 1.2% increase related primarily to royalties from new
Franchise Drive-Ins, offset by the impact of the declining effective royalty
rate and the decline in same-store sales at Franchise Drive-Ins.
Franchisee
fees remained relatively constant at approximately $1.2 million for the first
fiscal quarter of both 2009 and 2008. Franchisees opened 34 new
drive-ins in the first fiscal quarter of 2009, compared to 31 new drive-ins in
the first fiscal quarter of 2008. Fees associated with the
termination of area development agreements decreased $0.2 million for the first
fiscal quarter of 2009 compared to prior year, offsetting the higher revenue
resulting from the increase in new drive-in openings.
Operating
Expenses
.
The following table
presents the overall costs of drive-in operations, as a percentage of Partner
Drive-In sales. Minority interest in earnings of Partner Drive-Ins is
included as a part of cost of sales, in the table below, since it is directly
related to Partner Drive-In operations.
Restaurant-Level
Margins
|
|
|
Quarter
ended
|
|
|
Percentage
points
|
|
|
|
|
November
30,
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Costs
and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
Drive-Ins:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food
and packaging
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
Payroll
and other employee benefits
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
Minority
interest in earnings of Partner Drive-Ins
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
Other
operating expenses
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.4
|
%
|
|
|
81.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Restaurant-level
margins declined overall in the first fiscal quarter of 2009 as a result of
higher commodity prices, higher labor costs driven by minimum wage increases and
the de-leveraging impact of lower sales. These negative impacts were
offset by the decline in minority partners’ share of earnings reflecting the
margin pressures described above.
Selling,
General and Administrative
.
Selling, general
and administrative expenses increased 8.4% to $16.2 million during the first
fiscal quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. Headcount
additions were the primary contributor to the year-over-year
increase.
Depreciation
and Amortization
.
Depreciation and
amortization expense increased 6.7% to $13.0 million in the first
quarter. Capital expenditures during the first three months of fiscal
year 2009 were $15.1 million. Looking forward, capital expenditures
are expected to total approximately $60 to $65 million for the
year.
Provision
for Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.
We assess drive-in assets
for impairment on a quarterly basis under the guidelines of SFAS 144,
“Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets.” During the first fiscal quarter of 2009, one Partner
Drive-In was impaired, resulting in charges of $0.4 million to reduce the
carrying cost of the related assets to estimated fair value. We
continue to perform quarterly analyses of certain underperforming drive-ins. It
is reasonably possible that the estimate of future cash flows associated with
these drive-ins could change in the future resulting in the need to write down
assets associated with one or more of these drive-ins to fair
value.
Interest
Expense
.
Net interest
expense decreased $0.3 million to $11.7 million as compared to the same period
in fiscal year 2008. The decrease is primarily attributed to the
reduction in debt due to scheduled amortization payments on our fixed rate
notes.
Income
Taxes
.
The provision
for income taxes reflects an effective federal and state tax rate of 41.4% for
the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 as compared to 38.0% in the same period of
2008. The higher rate in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 is due
primarily to federal tax adjustments, the impact of which are amplified by lower
net income for the period. Our tax rate may continue to vary
significantly from quarter to quarter depending on the timing of stock option
exercises and dispositions by stock option-holders and as circumstances on
individual tax matters change.
Financial
Position
During
the first fiscal quarter of 2009, current assets decreased 2.6% to $96.8 million
compared to $99.4 million as of the prior fiscal year end, due primarily to
lower royalty receivable balances associated with seasonally lower sales and the
collection of other receivables. Net property and equipment decreased
approximately $13.3 million primarily as a result of depreciation of $12.9
million and the disposition of $12.5 million in property and equipment related
to the sale of eight Partner Drive-Ins to a franchisee, offset by capital
expenditures of $15.1 million, and sales and retirement of assets for the
balance of the change. These changes combined with the decrease in
current assets to produce a 2.1% decrease in total assets to $818.5 million as
of the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Total
current liabilities decreased $6.7 million or 5.9% during the first fiscal
quarter of 2009 primarily as a result of the general decline in payables
associated with lower sales. The noncurrent portion of long-term debt
decreased $21.8 million or 3.0% as a result of reflecting scheduled principal
payments on the fixed rate notes and payment of $10.0 million on the variable
rate notes. Overall, total liabilities decreased $27.3 million or
3.0% as a result of the items discussed above.
Stockholders’
deficit improved $9.4 million or 14.7% during the first three months of fiscal
year 2009. Earnings of $7.1 million, along with $2.1 million for the combination
of stock compensation and the proceeds and related tax benefits from the
exercise of stock options, decreased the stockholders’ deficit.
Liquidity
and Sources of Capital
Operating
Cash Flows
. Net cash provided by operating activities
decreased $11.1 million or 37.6% to $18.3 million in the first fiscal quarter of
2009 as compared to $29.4 million in the same period of fiscal year
2008. The decrease resulted primarily from lower net income for the
first fiscal quarter of 2009, along with increased use of cash for operating
assets and liabilities.
Investing
Cash Flows
.
Net cash used in
investing activities decreased by $23.2 million to $1.8 million in the first
fiscal quarter of 2009 as compared to $25.0 million in the same period of fiscal
year 2008. Capital expenditures of $15.1 million were mostly offset
by proceeds of $14.4 million from the sale of Partner Drive-Ins. We
opened five newly constructed Partner Drive-Ins, purchasing the real estate for
all of these new drive-ins. The following table sets forth the
components of our investments in capital additions for the first three months of
fiscal year 2009 (in millions):
|
New
Partner Drive-Ins, including drive-ins under construction
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
Retrofits,
drive-thru additions and LED signs in existing drive-ins
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
Rebuilds,
relocations and remodels of existing drive-ins
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
Replacement
equipment for existing drive-ins and other
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
Total
investing cash flows for capital additions
|
|
$
|
15.1
|
|
Financing
Cash Flows
. Net cash used in financing activities increased by
$13.8 million to $15.0 million in the first fiscal quarter of 2009 as compared
to $1.1 million in the same period of fiscal year 2008. The increase
resulted from having sufficient cash on hand to fund operating and investing
activities without taking advances on the Variable Funding Notes. In
addition, no purchases of treasury stock were made during the first quarter of
fiscal year 2009 compared to $26.7 million the same period of the prior
year.
The
Company has a securitized financing facility of Variable Funding Notes that
provides for the issuance of up to $200.0 million in borrowings and certain
other credit instruments, including letters of credit. As of November
30, 2008, our outstanding balance under the Variable Funding Notes totaled
$175.0 million at an effective borrowing rate of 3.38%, as well as $0.3 million
in outstanding letters of credit. Subsequent to November 30, 2008,
the Company requested to draw down the remaining $24.7 million available under
the Variable Funding Notes. Two lenders are each responsible for
funding 50% of the total amount available. One of the lenders filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on September 15, 2008. This lender notified
the Company that it could not meet its obligation at the current
time. Consequently, of the $24.7 million requested, the Company
received approximately $12.4 million. The Company currently does not
consider the remaining amount of approximately $12.3 million to be
available. Prior to August 31, 2008, the Company was aware of
possible issues with the lender and had taken advances that were held in cash to
ensure liquidity for short-term financing needs. See Note 9 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended August 31, 2008 for additional information regarding our
long-term debt.
We plan
capital expenditures of approximately $60 to $65 million in fiscal year 2009,
excluding potential acquisitions and share repurchases. These capital
expenditures primarily relate to the development of additional Partner
Drive-Ins, retrofit of existing Partner Drive-Ins and other drive-in level
expenditures. We expect to fund these capital expenditures through
cash flow from operations as well as cash on hand.
As of
November 30, 2008, our total cash balance of $73.7 million ($45.9 million of
unrestricted and $27.8 million of restricted cash balances) reflected the impact
of the cash generated from operating activities, borrowing activity, and capital
expenditures mentioned above. We believe that existing cash and funds
generated from operations will meet our needs for the foreseeable
future.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Critical
accounting policies are those the Company believes are most important to
portraying its financial conditions and results of operations and also require
the greatest amount of subjective or complex judgments by management. Judgments
and uncertainties regarding the application of these policies may result in
materially different amounts being reported under various conditions or using
different assumptions. There have been no material changes to the critical
accounting policies previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended August 31, 2008.
|
|
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
Sonic’s
use of debt directly exposes the Company to interest rate
risk. Floating rate debt, where the interest rate fluctuates
periodically, exposes the Company to short-term changes in market interest
rates. Fixed rate debt, where the interest rate is fixed over the
life of the instrument, exposes the Company to changes in market interest rates
reflected in the fair value of the debt and to the risk that the Company may
need to refinance maturing debt with new debt at a higher rate. Sonic
is also exposed to market risk from changes in commodity
prices. Sonic does not utilize financial instruments for trading
purposes. Sonic manages its debt portfolio to achieve an overall
desired position of fixed and floating rates and may employ interest rate swaps
as a tool to achieve that goal in the future.
Interest
Rate Risk.
Our exposure to interest rate risk at November 30,
2008 is primarily based on the fixed rate notes with an effective rate of 5.7%,
before amortization of debt-related costs. At November 30, 2008, the
fair value of the fixed rate notes was estimated at $513.2 million versus
carrying value of $567.6 million (including accrued interest). Should interest
rates and/or credit spreads increase or decrease by one percentage point, the
estimated fair value of the fixed rate notes would decrease by
approximately $14.5 million or increase by
approximately $1
5.0
million, respectively. The fair value estimate required significant
assumptions by management as there are few, if any, securiti
zed loan
transactions
occuring
in the current market. Management used market information available for
public debt transactions
for
companies with ratings that are close to or lower than ratings for the Company
(without consideration for the third-party credit enhancement). Management
believes
this fair
value is a reasonable estimate with the information that is available. The
difference between fair value and carrying value is attributable to interest
rate decreases subsequent to when the debt was originally issued, more than
offset by the increase in credit spreads required by issuers of similar debt
instruments in the current market.
The variable fundings
notes
outstanding at November 30, 2008 totaled $175.0 million, with a variable rate of
3.38%. The annual impact on our results of operations of a one-point
interest rate change for the balance outstanding would be approximately $1.8
million before tax. In addition, at November 30, 2008, the fair value
of the variable funding notes was estimated at $150.3 million versus carrying
value of $175.2 million (including accrued interest). Should credit
spreads increase or decrease by one percentage point, the estimated fair value
of the variable funding notes would decrease by approximately $5.5 million or
increase by approximately $5.8 million, respectively. The Company
used similar assumptions to value the variable funding notes as were used for
the fixed rate notes. The difference between fair value and carrying
value is attributable to the increase in credit spreads required by issuers of
similar debt instruments in the current market.
For
further discussion of our exposure to market risk, refer to
Item 7A,
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008.