UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
( Mark one)
| þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 26, 2005
OR
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-19528
QUALCOMM Incorporated
| Delaware | 95-3685934 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
| incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
| 5775 Morehouse Dr., San Diego, California | 92121-1714 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(858) 587-1121
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the close of business on July 18, 2005, were as follows:
| Class | Number of Shares | ||||
|
Common Stock, $0.0001 per share par value
|
1,630,416,597 | ||||
INDEX
| Page | ||||||||
| 3 | ||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||
| 21 | ||||||||
| 44 | ||||||||
| 45 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
CERTIFICATIONS
|
||||||||
| EXHIBIT 31.1 | ||||||||
| EXHIBIT 31.2 | ||||||||
| EXHIBIT 32.1 | ||||||||
| EXHIBIT 32.2 | ||||||||
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
QUALCOMM Incorporated
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
QUALCOMM Incorporated
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
QUALCOMM Incorporated
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
Financial Statement Preparation.
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared by QUALCOMM Incorporated (the Company or QUALCOMM), without audit, in
accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not necessarily include all
information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of its consolidated financial position,
results of operations and cash flows in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 26, 2004 is derived from
the audited consolidated balance sheet at that date which is not presented herein. The Company
operates and reports using a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the last Sunday in September. The
three month and nine month periods ended June 26, 2005 and June 27, 2004 included 13 weeks and 39
weeks, respectively.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial information for the interim periods
presented reflects all adjustments, which are only normal and recurring, necessary for a fair
statement of results of operations, financial position and cash flows. These condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2004.
Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an
entire fiscal year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts and the disclosure of contingent amounts in the Companys financial statements and
the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain prior year
amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Principles of Consolidation.
The Companys consolidated financial statements include the
assets, liabilities and operating results of majority-owned subsidiaries. The ownership of the
other interest holders of consolidated subsidiaries is reflected as minority interest and is not
significant. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain
of the Companys foreign subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements one
month in arrears to facilitate the timely inclusion of such entities in the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
The Company deconsolidated the Vésper Operating Companies during the first quarter of fiscal
2004 as a result of their sale in December 2003 and TowerCo during the second quarter of fiscal
2004 as a result of its sale in March 2004 (Note 10). Results of operations and cash flows related
to the Vésper Operating Companies and TowerCo are presented as discontinued operations.
Royalty Revenues.
The Company licenses rights to use portions of its intellectual property
portfolio, which includes certain patent rights essential to and/or useful in the manufacture and
sale of CDMA, or Code Division Multiple Access, (including, without limitation, all versions of
cdmaOne, CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA, WCDMA and their derivatives) products. The Company earns royalties on
such licensed CDMA products sold worldwide by its licensees at the time that the licensees sales
occur. The Companys licensees, however, do not report and pay royalties owed for sales in any
given quarter until after the conclusion of that quarter, and, in some instances, although
royalties are reported quarterly, payment is on a semi-annual basis. During the periods preceding
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company estimated and recorded the royalty revenues earned
for sales by certain licensees (the Estimated Licensees) in the quarter in which such sales
occurred, but only when reasonable estimates of such amounts could be made. Not all royalties
earned were recorded based on estimates. Once royalty reports were received from the Estimated
Licensees, the variance between such reports and the estimate was recorded as royalty revenues in
the quarter in which the reports were received, i.e. in most cases, the quarter subsequent to the
quarter in which the estimated royalties were recorded as revenue.
Starting in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company determined that, due to escalating
and changing business trends, the Company no longer had the ability to reliably estimate royalty
revenues from the Estimated Licensees. These escalating and changing trends included the commercial
launches and global expansion of WCDMA networks, changes in market share among licensees due to
increased global competition, and increased variability in the integrated circuit and finished
product inventories of licensees. Starting in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company began
recognizing royalty revenues for a quarter solely based on royalties reported by licensees during
such quarter. The change in the timing of recognizing royalty revenues was made prospectively and
6
QUALCOMM Incorporated
had the initial one-time effect of reducing royalty revenues recorded in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2004. Accordingly, the Company did not estimate royalty revenues earned in the three months
and nine months ended June 26, 2005. Total royalties reported by external licensees for the three
months and nine months ended June 26, 2005 and recorded as revenues for those periods were $401
million and $1,197 million, respectively. Total royalties reported by external licensees during the
three months and nine months ended June 27, 2004 were $373 million and $939 million, respectively,
as compared to $389 million and $1,041 million, respectively, recorded as royalty revenues from
external licensees for the same periods.
Earnings Per Common Share.
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted
earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the combination of dilutive common
share equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under the Companys share-based compensation plans
and shares subject to written put options, and the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the reporting period. The incremental dilutive common share equivalents,
calculated using the treasury stock method, for the three months and nine months ended June 26,
2005 were 50,289,000 and 57,542,000, respectively. The incremental dilutive common share
equivalents, calculated using the treasury stock method, for the three months and nine months ended
June 27, 2004 were 60,472,000 and 57,580,000, respectively.
Employee stock options to purchase approximately 37,180,000 and 33,426,000 shares of common
stock during the three months and nine months ended June 26, 2005, respectively, and employee stock
options to purchase approximately 32,367,000 and 47,579,000 shares of common stock during the three
months and nine months ended June 27, 2004, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per common share because the option exercise price was greater than
the average market price of the common stock, and therefore, the effect on diluted earnings per
share would be anti-dilutive.
Comprehensive Income.
Total comprehensive income consisted of the following (in millions):
7
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Components of accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of the following (in
millions):
Share-Based Payments.
The Company records compensation expense for employee stock options
based upon their intrinsic value on the date of grant pursuant to Accounting Principles Board
Opinion 25 (APB 25), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Because the Company establishes
the exercise price based on the fair market value of the Companys stock at the date of grant, the
stock options have no intrinsic value upon grant, and therefore no expense is recorded. Each
quarter, the Company reports the potential dilutive impact of share-based payments in its diluted
earnings per common share using the treasury stock method. Out-of-the-money stock options (i.e.,
the average stock price during the period is below the strike price of the stock option) are not
included in diluted earnings per common share as their effect is anti-dilutive.
As required under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123 (FAS 123),
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148
(FAS 148), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, the pro forma
effects of share-based payments on net income and earnings per common share have been estimated at
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing
model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no
restrictions and are fully transferable and negotiable in a free trading market. This model does
not consider the employment, transfer or vesting restrictions that are inherent in the Companys
employee stock options or purchase rights granted pursuant to the Employee Stock Purchase Plans.
Use of an option valuation model, as required by FAS 123, includes highly subjective assumptions
based on long-term predictions, including the expected stock price volatility and average life of
each stock option grant. Because the Companys share-based payments have characteristics
significantly different from those of freely traded options, and because changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the Companys estimate of fair values, in the Companys
opinion, existing valuation models may not be reliable single measures of the fair values of the
Companys share-based payments. The Black-Scholes weighted average estimated fair values of stock
options granted during the three months and nine months ended June 26, 2005 were $12.37 and $15.03
per share, respectively. The Black-Scholes weighted average estimated fair values of stock options
granted during the three months and nine months ended June 27, 2004 were $16.89 and $13.83 per
share, respectively. The Black-Scholes weighted average estimated fair values of purchase rights
granted pursuant to the Employee Stock Purchase Plans during the nine months ended June 26, 2005
and June 27, 2004 were $10.20 and $6.57 per share, respectively.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of share-based payments is
assumed to be amortized to expense over their vesting periods. The pro forma effects of recognizing
compensation expense under the fair value method on net income and earnings per common share were
as follows (in millions, except for earnings per common share):
8
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Future Accounting Requirements.
In December 2004, the FASB revised Statement No. 123 (FAS
123R), Share-Based Payment, which requires companies to expense the estimated fair value of
employee stock options and similar awards. On April 14, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission adopted a new rule amending the compliance dates for FAS 123R. In accordance with the
new rule, the accounting provisions of FAS 123R will be effective for the Company beginning in the
first quarter of fiscal 2006. The Company will adopt the provisions of FAS 123R using a modified
prospective application. Under modified prospective application, FAS 123R, which provides certain
changes to the method for valuing share-based compensation among other changes, will apply to new
awards and to awards that are outstanding on the effective date and are subsequently modified or
cancelled. Compensation expense for outstanding awards for which the requisite service had not been
rendered as of the effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period using the
compensation cost calculated for pro forma disclosure purposes under FAS 123. At June 26, 2005,
unamortized compensation expense related to outstanding unvested options, as determined in
accordance with FAS 123, that the Company expects to record during fiscal 2006 was approximately
$401 million before income taxes. The Company will incur additional expense during fiscal 2006
related to new awards granted during the remainder of fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006 that cannot yet
be quantified. The Company is in the process of determining how the guidance regarding valuing
share-based compensation as prescribed in FAS 123R will be applied to valuing share-based awards
granted after the effective date and the impact that the recognition of compensation expense
related to such awards will have on its financial statements.
Note 2 Composition of Certain Financial Statement Items
Marketable Securities.
Marketable securities were comprised as follows (in millions):
9
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Accounts Receivable.
Inventories.
10
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Property, Plant and Equipment.
Depreciation and amortization expense from continuing operations related to property, plant
and equipment for the three months and nine months ended June 26, 2005 was $45 million and $127
million, respectively, as compared to $34 million and $96 million for the three months and nine
months ended June 27, 2004, respectively.
Intangible Assets.
The components of purchased intangible assets, which are included in other
assets, were as follows (in millions):
Wireless licenses increased as a result of the Companys acquisition of additional 700 MHz
spectrum in the United States during the nine months ended June 26, 2005 for its MediaFLO USA
business (Note 8). Increases in other intangible asset categories primarily resulted from
acquisitions during the first quarter of fiscal 2005 (Note 9). As a result of the acquisitions, the
weighted-average amortization period for technology-based intangible assets was 9 years at June 26,
2005, as compared to 11 years at September 26, 2004. The weighted-average amortization period for
other intangible assets was not affected.
Amortization expense from continuing operations for the three months and nine months ended
June 26, 2005 was $5 million and $14 million, respectively, as compared to $3 million and $14
million for the three months and nine months ended June 27, 2004, respectively. Amortization
expense related to these intangible assets is expected to be $5 million for the remainder of fiscal
2005, $21 million in fiscal 2006, $18 million in fiscal 2007, $14 million in fiscal 2008 and $13
million in fiscal 2009.
Note 3 Investments in Other Entities
Inquam Limited.
The Company and another investor (the Other Investor) have equity and debt
investments in Inquam Limited (Inquam). Inquam owns, develops and manages wireless CDMA-based
communications systems, either directly or indirectly, primarily in Romania and Portugal. The
Company recorded $7 million and $26 million in equity in losses of Inquam during the three months
and nine months ended June 26, 2005, respectively, as compared to $17 million and $51 million for
the three months and nine months ended June 27, 2004, respectively. At June 26, 2005 the Companys
equity and debt investments in Inquam totaled $33 million, net of equity in losses.
11
QUALCOMM Incorporated
During the nine months ended June 26, 2005, Inquam secured new long-term financing (the new
facilities). The Company and the Other Investor have each guaranteed 50% of a portion of the
amounts owed under certain of the new facilities, up to a combined maximum of $54 million. Amounts
outstanding under the new facilities subject to the guarantee totaled $54 million as of June 26,
2005. The guarantee expires and the new facilities mature on December 25, 2011.
At June 26, 2005, the Company had a remaining funding commitment under its bridge loan
agreement of $1 million. The Company and the Other Investor continue to have active discussions
with Inquam concerning the necessary funding for all or a part of Inquams business plan, potential
restructuring and investment by other parties. While the Company may provide some additional
funding in furtherance of Inquams business plan, the amount and form of such support is unknown,
and none is expected without commensurate support or consideration being provided by the Other
Investor.
Other.
Other strategic investments as of June 26, 2005 and September 26, 2004 totaled $96
million and $123 million, respectively, including $56 million and $50 million, respectively,
accounted for using the cost method. Funding commitments related to these investments totaled $14
million at June 26, 2005, which the Company expects to fund through fiscal 2009. Such commitments
are subject to the investees meeting certain conditions; actual equity funding may be in lesser
amounts. An investees failure to develop and provide competitive products and services due to lack
of financing, market demand or an unfavorable economic environment could adversely affect the value
of the Companys investment in the investee. There can be no assurance that the investees will be
successful in their efforts.
Note 4 Investment Income, Net
Investment income, net, was comprised as follows (in millions):
Note 5 Income Taxes
The Company currently estimates its annual effective income tax rate to be approximately 22%
for fiscal 2005, as compared to the 25% effective income tax rate in fiscal 2004. The Companys
estimated effective tax rate for fiscal 2005 decreased from 24% in the second quarter to 22% in the
third quarter, which resulted in an 18% effective tax rate in the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
The Company reduced its income tax expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 by recording a tax
benefit of approximately $42 million related to the Companys increased ability to use capital loss
carryforwards and a tax benefit of approximately $38 million related to an election made to compute
the Companys California state income tax based solely on income earned within the United States.
The estimated annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2005 is 13% lower than the United States
federal statutory rate primarily due to benefits of approximately 10% related to foreign earnings
taxed at less than the United States federal rate, 3% related to research and development tax
credits, 3% related to an increase in tax benefits recorded arising from the Companys forecast of
its ability to use its capital loss carryforwards, partially offset by state taxes of approximately
3%. The prior fiscal year rate was lower than the United States federal statutory rate as a result
of foreign earnings taxed at less than the United States federal rate, an increase in the forecast
of our ability to use capital loss carryforwards, and research and development credits, partially
offset by state taxes.
12
QUALCOMM Incorporated
The Company has not provided for United States income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on a
cumulative total of approximately $1.6 billion of undistributed earnings of certain non-United
States subsidiaries indefinitely invested outside the United States. Should the Company decide to
repatriate foreign earnings, the Company would have to adjust the income tax provision in the
period management determined that the Company would repatriate the earnings. The Company is
currently studying the impact of the one-time favorable foreign dividend provisions enacted on
October 22, 2004 as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The Company expects to
repatriate $500 million of foreign earnings no later than fiscal 2006 at an expected tax cost of
approximately $33 million.
The Company believes, more likely than not, that it will have sufficient taxable income after
stock option related deductions to utilize the majority of its deferred tax assets. As of June 26,
2005, the Company has provided a valuation allowance on net capital losses of $73 million. The
valuation allowance related to capital losses reflects the uncertainty surrounding the Companys
ability to generate sufficient capital gains to utilize all capital losses.
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance, decreased by approximately $99 million from
September 26, 2004 to June 26, 2005 primarily because of the use of certain deferred tax assets to
offset the current tax liability that otherwise would have resulted from current operations.
Note 6 Stockholders Equity
Changes in stockholders equity for the nine months ended June 26, 2005 were as follows (in
millions):
Stock Repurchase Program.
On March 8, 2005, the Company authorized the expenditure of up
to $2 billion to repurchase shares of the Companys stock. During the nine months ended June 26,
2005, the Company repurchased and retired 27,083,000 shares at a net aggregate cost of $953 million
under this plan.
In connection with the Companys stock repurchase program, the Company sold two put options,
with expiration dates of September 6, 2005 and December 7, 2005, under separate contracts with an
independent third party during the nine months ended June 26, 2005 that may require the Company to
purchase 11,500,000 shares of its common stock upon exercise at a net cost of $389 million (net of
the option premiums received). The Company recorded the $29 million in premiums received as
additions to other current liabilities and recognized $9 million and $12 million in losses on
derivative instruments for the three months and nine months ended June 26, 2005, respectively, due
to increases in the fair values of the options. At June 26, 2005, the recorded values of the option
liabilities totaled $41 million. Any shares repurchased upon exercise of the put options will be
retired.
At June 26, 2005, $659 million remains authorized for repurchases under this program, which
does not have an expiration date.
Dividends.
On March 8, 2005, the Company announced an increase in the future cash dividend
rate on the Companys common stock from $0.07 to $0.09 per share. Cash dividends announced in the
nine months ended June 26, 2005 and June 27, 2004 were as follows (in millions, except per share
data):
13
QUALCOMM Incorporated
On July 7, 2005, the Company announced a cash dividend of $0.09 per share on the
Companys common stock, payable on September 23, 2005 to stockholders of record as of August 26,
2005, which will be reflected in the fourth quarter.
Note 7 Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation.
Durante, et al v. QUALCOMM
: On February 2, 2000, three former employees filed a
putative class action against the Company, alleging unlawful age discrimination in their selection
for layoff in 1999, and seeking monetary damages based thereon. On April 15, 2003, the United
States District Court for the Southern District of California granted the Companys summary
judgment motions as to all then-remaining class members disparate impact claims. On June 18, 2003,
the Court ordered decertification of the class and dismissed the remaining claims of the opt-in
plaintiffs without prejudice. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal, which was argued on June 22, 2005.
On June 20, 2003, 76 of the opt-in plaintiffs filed, but have not yet served, a new action in the
same court, alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act as a result of their
layoffs in 1999. To date, all but 27 of the class members and plaintiffs agreed to dismiss all
pending appeals and claims against the Company in exchange for a waiver of litigation costs.
Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. v. QUALCOMM, Inc. and SnapTrack, Inc.
: On March 30, 2001,
Zoltar Satellite Alarm Systems, Inc. filed suit against QUALCOMM and its subsidiary SnapTrack, Inc.
in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California seeking monetary
damages and injunctive relief based on the alleged infringement of three patents. Following a
verdict and finding of no infringement of Zoltars patent claims, the Court entered a judgment in
favor of the Company and SnapTrack on Zoltars complaint and awarded the Company and SnapTrack
their costs of suit. Zoltar filed a notice of appeal, and the Company and SnapTrack filed a
responsive notice and motion to dismiss. Zoltars appeal was dismissed and the issue of reaching a
final judgment on issues aside from non-infringement is pending before the district court.
QUALCOMM Incorporated v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.:
On December 2, 2002, the Company
filed an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against
Maxim alleging infringement of three patents and seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief
based thereon. The Company amended the complaint, bringing the total number of patents at issue to
four and adding misappropriation of trade secret and unfair competition claims. Maxim
counterclaimed against the Company, alleging antitrust violations, patent misuse and unfair
competition seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief based thereon. On May 5, 2004, the Court
granted Maxims motion that no indirect infringement arose in connection with defendants sales of
certain products to certain licensees of the Company. A motion by the Company for preliminary
injunction regarding the alleged trade secret misappropriations by Maxim was heard on January 4,
2005. The Court found that Maxim had acted unlawfully by misappropriating the Companys trade
secrets and issued an injunction order prohibiting further misappropriation and requiring Maxim to
notify customers of the order. Maxim has sought appellate review of the injunction order.
Whale Telecom Ltd v. QUALCOMM Incorporated:
On November 15, 2004, Whale Telecom Ltd. sued the
Company in the New York State Supreme Court, County of New York, seeking monetary damages based on
the claim that the Company fraudulently induced it to enter into certain infrastructure services
agreements in 1999 and later interfered with their performance of those agreements.
Broadcom Corporation v. QUALCOMM Incorporated:
On May 18, 2005, Broadcom filed two
actions in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against the
Company alleging infringement of ten patents and seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief
based thereon. On the same date, Broadcom also filed a complaint in the United States
International Trade Commission (ITC) alleging infringement of five of the same
14
QUALCOMM Incorporated
patents at issue in the Central District Court cases seeking a determination and relief under
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. On July 1, 2005, Broadcom filed an action in the United
States District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Company alleging violations of
state and federal antitrust and unfair competition laws as well as common law claims, generally
relating to licensing and chip sales activities, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief
based thereon. Discovery has commenced in the ITC action. Discovery has yet to begin in the
District Court actions.
QUALCOMM Incorporated v. Broadcom Corporation:
On July 11, 2005, the Company filed an action
in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against Broadcom
alleging infringement of seven patents, each of which is essential to the practice of either the
GSM or 802.11 standards, and seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief based thereon.
Discovery has yet to begin in the action.
Other:
The Company has been named, along with many other manufacturers of wireless phones,
wireless operators and industry-related organizations, as a defendant in purported class action
lawsuits, including In re Wireless Telephone Frequency Emissions Products Liability Litigation,
United States District Court for the District of Maryland, and several individually filed actions,
seeking monetary damages arising out of its sale of cellular phones. On March 5, 2003, the Court
granted the defendants motions to dismiss five of the consolidated cases (Pinney, Gimpleson,
Gillian, Farina and Naquin) on the grounds that the claims were preempted by federal law. On March
21, 2005, the 4
th
Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the ruling by the District Court and
ordered the cases remanded to state court. All remaining cases filed against the Company allege
personal injury as a result of their use of a wireless telephone. Those cases have been remanded to
the Washington, D.C. Superior Court. The courts that have reviewed similar claims against other
companies to date have held that there was insufficient scientific basis for the plaintiffs claims
in those cases.
Although there can be no assurance that unfavorable outcomes in any of the foregoing matters
would not have a material adverse effect on the Companys operating results, liquidity or financial
position, the Company believes the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the actions.
The Company has not recorded any accrual for contingent liability associated with the legal
proceedings described above based on the Companys belief that a liability, while possible, is not
probable. Further, any possible range of loss cannot be estimated at this time. The Company is
engaged in numerous other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of its business and believes
that the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on its operating
results, liquidity or financial position. In addition, some matters that have previously been
disclosed may no longer be described in this Note because of rulings in the case, settlements,
changes in the Companys business or other developments rendering them no longer material to the
Companys operating results, liquidity or financial position.
Finance Receivables.
Finance receivables, which are included in other assets, result from
arrangements in which the Company has agreed to provide its customers or certain CDMA customers of
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson) with long-term interest bearing debt financing for the
purchase of equipment and/or services. At June 26, 2005, the Company has a commitment to extend up
to $118 million in long-term financing to certain CDMA customers of Ericsson. The funding of this
commitment, if it occurs, is not subject to a fixed expiration date and is subject to the CDMA
customers meeting conditions prescribed in the financing arrangement and, in certain cases, to
Ericsson also financing a portion of such sales and services. Financing under this arrangement is
generally collateralized by the related equipment. The commitment represents the maximum amount to
be financed; actual financing may be in lesser amounts.
Operating Leases.
The Company leases certain of its facilities and equipment under
noncancelable operating leases, with terms ranging from less than 1 year to 20 years and with
provisions for cost-of-living increases. Future minimum lease payments for the remainder of fiscal
2005 and each of the subsequent four years from fiscal 2006 through 2009 are $14 million, $48
million, $31 million, $18 million and $14 million, respectively, and $18 million thereafter.
Purchase Obligations.
The Company has agreements with suppliers and other parties to purchase
inventory, other goods and services and long-lived assets and estimates its noncancelable
obligations under these agreements for the remainder of fiscal 2005 and for each of the subsequent
four years from fiscal 2006 through 2009 to be $343 million, $201 million, $74 million, $28 million
and $7 million, respectively. Of the totals for the remainder of 2005 and for each of the
subsequent four years from fiscal 2006 through 2009, commitments to purchase integrated circuit
product inventories comprised $295 million, $144 million, $65 million, $24 million and $5 million,
respectively.
15
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Note 8 Segment Information
The Company is organized on the basis of products and services. The Company aggregates three
of its divisions into the QUALCOMM Wireless & Internet segment. Reportable segments are as follows:
During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company reorganized its MediaFLO USA business
into the QSI segment. The operating expenses related to the MediaFLO USA business were included in
reconciling items through the end of fiscal 2004. During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the
Company also reorganized a division in the QWI segment that develops and sells test tools to
support the design, development, testing and deployment of infrastructure and subscriber products
into the QCT segment. Prior period segment information has been adjusted to conform to the new
segment presentation.
The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on earnings (loss) before income
taxes (EBT) from continuing operations, excluding certain impairment and other charges that are not
allocated to the segments for management reporting purposes. EBT includes the allocation of certain
corporate expenses to the segments, including depreciation and amortization expense related to
unallocated corporate assets. Segment data includes intersegment revenues.
16
QUALCOMM Incorporated
The table below presents revenues and EBT for reportable segments (in millions):
Reconciling items in the previous table were comprised as follows (in millions):
Generally, revenues between segments are based on prevailing market rates for
substantially similar products and services or an approximation thereof. Certain charges are
allocated to the corporate functional department in the Companys management reports based on the
decision that those charges should not be used to evaluate the segments operating performance.
Unallocated charges include research and
development expenses and marketing expenses related to the development of the CDMA market that were
not deemed to be directly related to the businesses of the segments.
Revenues from external customers and intersegment revenues were as follows (in millions):
17
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Segment assets are comprised of accounts receivable and inventory for QCT, QTL and QWI.
The QSI segment assets include certain marketable securities, accounts receivable, finance
receivables, notes receivable, wireless licenses, other investments and all assets of consolidated
investees. Total segment assets differ from total assets on a consolidated basis as a result of
unallocated corporate assets primarily comprised of cash, cash equivalents, certain marketable
securities, property, plant and equipment, deferred tax assets, goodwill and certain other
intangible assets. Segment assets were as follows (in millions):
The increase in QTLs segment assets resulted from an increase in accounts receivable
from licensees that report royalties quarterly and make payments on a semi-annual basis.
Note 9 Acquisitions
In October 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding capital stock
of Iridigm Display Corporation (Iridigm), a privately held display technology company, that it did
not already own. As a result of the closing of the acquisition, the Company no longer treats its
previously owned interest in Iridigm as a cost method investment. The purchase price was
approximately $188 million, comprised primarily of $160 million in cash consideration, $18 million
related to the fair value of vested and unvested options exchanged at the closing date, and the $9
million recorded value of the Companys earlier investment in Iridigm. The $160 million of total
cash consideration less cash acquired of approximately $24 million resulted in a net cash outlay of
approximately $136 million. Iridigm is a nonreportable segment included in reconciling items in the
reconciliation of revenues and EBT for reportable segments to the consolidated totals.
In October 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding capital stock
of Trigenix Limited (Trigenix), a United Kingdom-based developer of user interfaces for mobile
phones for a purchase price of
18
QUALCOMM Incorporated
approximately $35 million, comprised primarily of $33 million in
cash consideration. Trigenix is consolidated in the QIS division of the QWI segment.
In November 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding capital
stock of Spike Technologies, Inc., Spike InfoTech Private Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Spike Technologies, Inc., and Spike Technologies India Private Ltd. (collectively Spike). Spike is
a semiconductor design services company based primarily in India. The initial purchase price of
approximately $15 million was comprised primarily of $7 million in cash consideration, $6 million
in notes payable to the former shareholders and $1 million related to the fair value of vested and
unvested options exchanged at the closing date. The $7 million of cash consideration less cash
acquired of approximately $3 million resulted in a net cash outlay of approximately $4 million. An
additional $4 million in consideration is payable in cash through November 2006 if certain
performance and other milestones are reached. Spike is consolidated in the QCT segment.
The preliminary allocation of purchase price to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities
based on the estimated fair values was as follows (in millions):
The Company expects to finalize the purchase price allocations within one year of the
acquisition dates and does not anticipate material adjustments to the preliminary purchase price
allocations. Amounts allocated to other intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives ranging from three to seven years. The consolidated
financial statements include the operating results of these businesses from their respective dates
of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of the
acquisitions was not material.
Note 10 Discontinued Operations
On December 2, 2003, Embratel Participações S.A. (Embratel) acquired the Companys direct and
indirect ownership interests in Vésper São Paulo S.A. and Vésper S.A. (the Vésper Operating
Companies), consolidated
subsidiaries of the Companys QSI segment, (the Embratel sale transaction) for no
consideration. The Vésper Operating Companies existing communication towers and related interests
in tower site property leases (Vésper Towers) were not included in the Embratel sale transaction,
and as such, the Company effectively retained, through a new wholly-owned subsidiary (TowerCo),
ownership and control of the Vésper Towers. The Company realized a net loss of $52 million on the
Embratel sale transaction during the first quarter of fiscal 2004, including a $74 million loss on
the net assets sold to Embratel and a $46 million loss related to the recognition of cumulative
foreign currency translation losses previously included in stockholders equity, partially offset
by $68 million in gains related to the extinguishment of local bank debt and the settlement of
other liabilities.
In December 2003, the Company initiated a waiver and return of its personal mobile service
(SMP) licenses in certain regions in Brazil to Anatel, the telecommunications regulatory agency in
Brazil. In February 2004, the waiver and return of the SMP licenses was approved by Anatel, and the
license debt was extinguished.
On March 2, 2004, the Company sold TowerCo to Embratel in a separately negotiated transaction
(the TowerCo sale transaction) for $45 million in cash. TowerCos assets were primarily comprised
of $5 million in property, plant and equipment. As a result of the disposition of the remaining
operations and assets related to the Vésper Operating Companies, the Company determined that the
results of operations and cash flows related to the Vésper Operating
19
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Companies, including the
results related to TowerCo and the SMP licenses and the gains and losses realized on the Embratel
and TowerCo sales transactions, should be presented as discontinued operations in its consolidated
statements of operations and cash flows. For the nine months ended June 27, 2004, revenues of $36
million were reported in the loss from discontinued operations. At June 26, 2005 and September 26,
2004, the Company had no remaining assets or liabilities related to the Vésper Operating Companies,
TowerCo or SMP licenses recorded on its condensed consolidated balance sheet.
20
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
This information should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report and the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended September 26, 2004
contained in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In addition to historical information, the following discussion contains forward-looking
statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ substantially
from those referred to herein due to a number of factors, including but not limited to risks
described in the section entitled Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
Overview
Quarterly Highlights
Revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 were $1.36 billion, with net income of $560
million. The following recent developments occurred with respect to key elements of our business or
our industry:
Our Business and Operating Segments
We design, manufacture and market digital wireless telecommunications products and services
based on our CDMA technology and other technologies. We derive revenue principally from sales of
integrated circuit products, from license fees and royalties for use of our intellectual property,
from services and related hardware sales and from software development and licensing and related
services. Operating expenses primarily consist of cost of equipment and services, research and
development and selling, general and administrative expenses.
We conduct business through four operating segments. These segments are: QUALCOMM CDMA
Technologies, or QCT; QUALCOMM Technology Licensing, or QTL; QUALCOMM Wireless & Internet, or QWI;
and QUALCOMM Strategic Initiatives, or QSI.
QCT is a leading developer and supplier of integrated circuits and system software for
wireless voice and data communications, multimedia functions and global positioning products. QCTs
integrated circuit products and software are used in wireless phones and infrastructure equipment.
The wireless phone integrated circuits include the MSM, Radio Frequency (RF) and Power Management
(PM) devices. The wireless phone integrated circuits and software perform voice and data
communication, multimedia and global positioning functions, radio conversion between radio and
baseband signals and power management. The infrastructure equipment integrated circuits provide the
core baseband CDMA modem functionality in the operators equipment. QCT software products are the
operating systems that control the phone and the functionality imbedded in our integrated circuit
products.
QCT revenues comprised 56% and 59% of total consolidated revenues for the third quarter of
fiscal 2005 and 2004. QCT revenues comprised 58% and 60% of total consolidated revenues for the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively.
21
QTL grants licenses to use portions of our intellectual property portfolio, which includes
certain patent rights essential to and/or useful in the manufacture and sale of CDMA (including,
without limitation, all versions of cdmaOne, CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA, WCDMA and their derivatives)
products. QTL receives license fees as well as ongoing royalties based on worldwide sales by
licensees of products incorporating our intellectual property. QTL revenues comprised 33% of total
consolidated revenues for the third quarter of both fiscal 2005 and 2004. QTL revenues comprised
33% and 31% of total consolidated revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
QWI, which includes QUALCOMM Wireless Business Solutions (QWBS), QUALCOMM Internet Services
(QIS) and QUALCOMM Government Technologies (QGOV), generates revenues primarily through mobile
communication products and services, software and software development aimed at support and
delivery of wireless applications. QWBS provides satellite and terrestrial-based two-way data
messaging, position reporting and wireless application services to transportation companies,
private fleets, construction equipment fleets and other enterprise companies. QIS provides the BREW
(Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless) product and services, including the UiOne product, for
the development and over-the-air deployment of data services on wireless devices. QIS also provides
QChat and QPoint products and services. QChat enables virtually instantaneous push-to-chat
functionality on CDMA-based wireless devices while QPoint enables operators to offer E-911 and
location-based applications and services. The QGOV division provides development, hardware and
analytical expertise to United States government agencies involving wireless communications
technologies. QWI revenues comprised 12% and 11% of total consolidated revenues in the third
quarter of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively. QWI revenues comprised 12% and 11% of total
consolidated revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively.
QSI makes strategic investments to promote the worldwide adoption of CDMA products and
services. Our strategy is to invest in CDMA operators, licensed device manufacturers and start-up
companies that we believe open new markets for CDMA technology, support the design and introduction
of new CDMA-based products or possess unique capabilities or technology. Effective as of the
beginning of fiscal 2005, we present the operating results of our wireless multimedia operator,
MediaFLO USA, Inc. (MediaFLO USA), in the QSI segment. Our MediaFLO USA subsidiary expects to offer
a FLO (Forward Link Only) technology based network, initially targeting 100 top markets, with the
eventual capability for broad nationwide coverage. This network is expected to be utilized as a
shared resource for wireless operators and their customers in the United States starting in 2006.
FLO is a multicast technology specifically designed for markets where dedicated spectrum is
available and where regulations permit high-power transmission, thereby reducing the number of
towers required to provide market coverage. MediaFLO USA plans to use our nationwide 700 MHz
spectrum and will be responsible for procuring and distributing content made available to its
wireless operator customers. Distribution, marketing, billing and customer relationships are
expected to remain with the wireless operator partners. We are evaluating a number of corporate
structuring options, including potentially distributing our ownership interest in MediaFLO USA to
our stockholders in a spin-off transaction.
Nonreportable segments include the Iridigm business, a display technology company that we
acquired in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, and other product initiatives.
Looking Forward
We expect continued growth in demand for CDMA2000 and WCDMA products and services in markets
around the world:
22
We are dependent upon the adoption and commercial deployment of 3G wireless communications
equipment, products and services based on our CDMA technology to increase our revenues and market
share. We continue to face significant competition from non-CDMA technologies, as well as
competition from companies offering other CDMA-based products. You should also refer to the Risk
Factors included in this Quarterly Report for further discussion of these and other risks related
to our business.
Revenue Concentrations
Revenues from customers in South Korea, Japan and the United States comprised 38%, 21% and
19%, respectively, of total consolidated revenues in the first nine months of fiscal 2005 as
compared to 43%, 19% and 21%, respectively, in the first nine months of fiscal 2004. We distinguish
revenue from external customers by geographic areas based on customer location. The increase in
revenues from customers in Japan from 19% of total revenues to 21% is primarily attributable to
higher sales of integrated circuit products to manufacturers in Japan and higher royalties from
licensees in Japan, both resulting from the growth of CDMA2000 and WCDMA sales in Japan as well as
the success of Japanese manufacturers in exporting products worldwide. Combined revenues from
customers in South Korea and the United States decreased as a percentage of total revenues, from
64% to 57%, due primarily to increases in revenues from WCDMA manufacturers in Western Europe and
increased activity by Chinese manufacturers.
Third Quarter of Fiscal 2005 Compared to Third Quarter of Fiscal 2004
Revenues.
Total revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 were $1.36 billion, compared to
$1.34 billion for the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Revenues from sales of equipment and services for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 were $882
million, compared to $888 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. Revenues from sales of
integrated circuit products decreased $27 million, resulting primarily from a decrease of $80
million related to the net effects of reductions in average sales prices and changes in product
mix, partially offset by an increase of $52 million related to higher unit shipments of MSM and
accompanying RF integrated circuits. Revenues from the sale of satellite and terrestrial-based
two-way data messaging systems and related messaging services increased $12 million.
Revenues from licensing and royalty fees for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 were $476
million, compared to $453 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. During the third quarter of
fiscal 2005, the QTL segment recorded royalty revenues solely based on royalties reported by
licensees during the quarter, as compared to the method used during the third quarter of fiscal
2004 of recording royalty revenues from certain licensees based on estimates of royalty revenues
earned by those licensees during the quarter. Revenues from licensing and royalty fees increased
primarily as a result of a $28 million increase in royalties reported to the QTL segment by
its external licensees, resulting from an increase in phone and infrastructure equipment sales by
its licensees at higher average selling prices of phones, partially offset by the effect of using
estimates to record royalty revenues in the third quarter of fiscal
2004 and an adjustment due to a royalty reimbursement claim by a certain
licensee. In the third quarter of
fiscal 2005, our licensees reported CDMA phone sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2005 of
approximately 43 million units, as compared to 38 million units reported in the third quarter of
fiscal 2004 for phone sales during the second quarter of fiscal 2004.
Cost of Equipment and Services.
Cost of equipment and services revenues for the third quarter
of fiscal 2005 was $389 million, compared to $369 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Cost of equipment and services revenues as a percentage of equipment and services revenues was 44%
for the third quarter of fiscal 2005, compared to 42% in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The
margin percentage decline in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 compared
23
to the third quarter of
fiscal 2004 was primarily due to a 1.0% decrease in the QCT margin percentage resulting primarily
from an increase in product support costs. Cost of equipment and services revenues as a percentage
of equipment and services revenues may fluctuate in future quarters depending on the mix of
products sold and services provided, competitive pricing, new product introduction costs and other
factors.
Research and Development Expenses.
For the third quarter of fiscal 2005, research and
development expenses were $259 million or 19% of revenues, compared to $194 million or 14% of
revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The dollar and percentage increases in research and
development expenses primarily resulted from increases in costs
related to the development of integrated circuit
products and initiatives to support lower cost phones, multimedia applications, high-speed
wireless Internet access and multimode, multiband, multinetwork products, including CDMA2000
1xEV-DO, WCDMA, MediaFLO and HSDPA.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.
For the third quarter of fiscal 2005, selling,
general and administrative expenses were $150 million or 11% of revenues, compared to $156 million
or 12% of revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The dollar decrease was primarily due to a
$13 million decrease in charitable contributions largely attributable to a grant to an educational
institution in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and a $4 million increase in other income,
partially offset by an $8 million increase in employee related expenses and professional fees.
Net Investment Income.
Net investment income was $126 million for the third quarter of fiscal
2005, compared to $46 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The net increase was primarily
comprised as follows (in millions):
The increase in interest income on cash and marketable securities held by corporate and other
segments was a result of higher average cash and marketable securities balances and higher interest
rates and dividends earned on these balances. Net realized gains on corporate investments increased
primarily as a result of an increase in marketable equity securities as a percentage of total
corporate investments in fiscal 2005, as compared to fiscal 2004. The increase in net realized
gains on strategic investments in QSI resulted primarily from a $48 million gain on our minority
investment in a wireless publisher. Gains and losses on derivative instruments in both fiscal 2005
and 2004 relate primarily to changes in the fair values of put options sold in connection with our
stock repurchase program. Equity in losses of investees decreased primarily due to a decrease in
losses incurred by Inquam, of which our share was $7 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2005
as compared to $17 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Income Tax Expense.
Income tax expense from continuing operations was $126 million for the
third quarter of fiscal 2005, compared to $182 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The
annual effective tax rate is estimated to be 22% for fiscal 2005, compared to the 29% estimated
annual effective tax rate recorded during the third quarter of fiscal 2004, and the effective tax
rate of 25% for fiscal 2004. The estimated effective tax rate for fiscal 2005 decreased from 24% in
the second quarter to 22% in the third quarter, which resulted in an 18% effective tax rate in the
third quarter of fiscal 2005. Our income tax expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 was
reduced as the result of a tax benefit of approximately $42 million related to our increased
ability to use capital loss carryforwards and a tax benefit of approximately $38 million related to
an election made to compute our California state income tax based solely on our income earned
within the United States.
24
The estimated annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2005 is 13% lower than the United States
federal statutory rate primarily due to benefits of approximately 10% related to foreign earnings
taxed at less than the United States federal rate, 3% related to research and development tax
credits, 3% related to an increase in tax benefits recorded arising from our forecast of our
ability to use our capital loss carryforwards, partially offset by state taxes of approximately 3%.
As of June 26, 2005, we had a valuation allowance of approximately $73 million on previously
incurred capital losses due to uncertainty as to our ability to generate sufficient capital gains
to utilize all capital losses. We will continue to assess the realizability of capital losses. The
amount of the valuation allowance on capital losses may be adjusted in the future as our ability to
utilize capital losses changes. A change in the valuation allowance may impact the provision for
income taxes in the period the change occurs.
First Nine Months of Fiscal 2005 Compared to First Nine Months of Fiscal 2004
Revenues.
Total revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 were $4.11 billion, compared
to $3.76 billion for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. Revenues from LG Electronics, Samsung,
and Motorola, customers of our QCT and QTL segments, comprised an aggregate of 16%, 12% and 11% of
total consolidated revenues, respectively, in the first nine months of fiscal 2005, as compared to
15%, 15% and 10% of total consolidated revenues, respectively, in the first nine months of fiscal
2004.
Revenues from sales of equipment and services for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 were
$2.71 billion, compared to $2.56 billion for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. Revenues from
sales of integrated circuit products increased $109 million, resulting primarily from an increase
of $302 million related to higher unit shipments of MSM and accompanying RF integrated circuits,
partially offset by a decrease of $208 million related to the net effects of reductions in average
sales prices and changes in product mix. Revenues from the sale of satellite and terrestrial-based
two-way data messaging systems and related messaging services increased $28 million.
Revenues from licensing and royalty fees for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 were $1.40
billion, compared to $1.20 billion for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. During the first nine
months of fiscal 2005, the QTL segment recorded royalty revenues solely based on royalties reported
by licensees during the quarter, as compared to the method used during the first nine months of
fiscal 2004 of recording royalty revenues from certain licensees based on estimates of royalty
revenues earned by those licensees during the quarter. Revenues from licensing and royalty fees
increased primarily as a result of a $258 million increase in royalties reported to the QTL segment
by its external licensees, resulting from an increase in phone and infrastructure equipment sales
by its licensees at higher average selling prices of phones, partially offset by the effect of
using estimates to record royalty revenues in the first nine months of fiscal 2004. In the first
nine months of fiscal 2005, our licensees reported CDMA phone sales for the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2004 and the first and second quarters of fiscal 2005 of approximately 134 million units, as
compared to 107 million units reported in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 for phone sales
during the comparative periods.
Cost of Equipment and Services.
Cost of equipment and services revenues for the first nine
months of fiscal 2005 was $1.20 billion, compared to $1.07 billion for the first nine months of
fiscal 2004. Cost of equipment and services revenues as a percentage of equipment and services
revenues was 44% for the first nine months of fiscal 2005, compared to 42% in the first nine months
of fiscal 2004. The margin percentage decline in the first nine months of fiscal 2005 compared to
the first nine months of fiscal 2004 was primarily due to a 1.8% decrease in QCT margin percentage.
Increases in product support costs and the reserves for excess and obsolete inventory contributed
1.1% and 0.9%, respectively, to the total decrease in QCT margin percentage. Cost of equipment and
services revenues as a percentage of equipment and services revenues may fluctuate in future
quarters depending on the mix of products sold and services provided, competitive pricing, new
product introduction costs and other factors.
Research and Development Expenses.
For the first nine months of fiscal 2005, research and
development expenses were $740 million or 18% of revenues, compared to $513 million or 14% of
revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. The dollar and percentage increases in research
and development expenses primarily resulted from increases in costs
related to the development of integrated circuit
products and initiatives to support lower cost phones, multimedia applications, high-speed
wireless Internet access and multimode, multiband, multinetwork products, including CDMA2000
1xEV-DO, WCDMA, MediaFLO and HSDPA.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.
For the first nine months of fiscal 2005,
selling, general and administrative expenses were $452 million or 11% of revenues, compared to $409
million or 11% of revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. The dollar increase was
primarily due to a $30 million increase in employee related expenses and a $19 million increase in
professional fees related to patent and audit activities, partially offset
25
by a $12 million decrease in charitable contributions largely attributable to a grant to an
educational institution in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and a $5 million decrease in other
income.
Net Investment Income.
Net investment income was $307 million for the first nine months of
fiscal 2005, compared to $114 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. The net increase
was primarily comprised as follows (in millions):
The increase in interest income on cash and marketable securities held by corporate and other
segments was a result of higher average cash and marketable securities balances and higher interest
rates and dividends earned on these balances. The decrease in QSI interest income was primarily the
result of the prepayment on the Pegaso debt facility in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. Net
realized gains on corporate investments increased primarily as a result of an increase in
marketable equity securities as a percentage of total corporate investments in fiscal 2005, as
compared to fiscal 2004. The increase in net realized gains on strategic investments in QSI
resulted primarily from a $48 million gain on our minority investment in a wireless publisher and a
$41 million gain on the sale of our investment in Next
Wave
Telecom Inc. Gains and losses on
derivative instruments in both fiscal 2005 and 2004 relate primarily to changes in the fair values
of put options sold in connection with our stock repurchase program. Equity in losses of investees
decreased primarily due to a decrease in losses incurred by Inquam, of which our share was $26
million for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 as compared to $51 million for the first nine
months of fiscal 2004.
Income Tax Expense.
Income tax expense from continuing operations was $418 million for the
first nine months of fiscal 2005, compared to $543 million for the first nine months of fiscal
2004. The annual effective tax rate is estimated to be 22% for fiscal 2005, compared to the 29%
estimated annual effective tax rate recorded during the first nine months of fiscal 2004, and the
annual effective tax rate of 25% for fiscal 2004. The decrease in the estimated rate for fiscal
2005 is primarily the result of our increased ability to use capital loss carryforwards and an
election made to compute our California state income tax based solely on our income earned within
the United States.
The estimated annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2005 is 13% lower than the United States
federal statutory rate primarily due to benefits of approximately 10% related to foreign earnings
taxed at less than the United States federal rate, 3% related to research and development tax
credits, 3% related to an increase in tax benefits recorded arising from our forecast of our
ability to use our capital loss carryforwards, partially offset by state taxes of approximately 3%.
As of June 26, 2005, we had a valuation allowance of approximately $73 million on previously
incurred capital losses due to uncertainty as to our ability to generate sufficient capital gains
to utilize all capital losses. We will continue to assess the realizability of capital losses. The
amount of the valuation allowance on capital losses may be adjusted in the future as our ability to
utilize capital losses changes. A change in the valuation allowance may impact the provision for
income taxes in the period the change occurs.
Our Segment Results for the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2005 Compared to the Third Quarter of Fiscal
2004
The following should be read in conjunction with the third quarter financial results of fiscal
2005 for each reporting segment. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Note 8
Segment Information.
26
QCT Segment.
QCT revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 were $766 million, compared to
$794 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. Equipment and services revenues, primarily from
MSM and accompanying RF integrated circuits, were $743 million for the third quarter of fiscal
2005, compared to $771 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The decrease in MSM and
accompanying RF integrated circuits revenue was comprised of a decrease of $80 million related to
the net effects of reductions in average sales prices and changes in product mix, partially offset
by an increase of $52 million related to higher unit shipments. Approximately 36 million MSM
integrated circuits were sold during the third quarter of fiscal 2005, compared to approximately 35
million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
QCTs earnings before taxes for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 were $186 million, compared
to $255 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. QCTs operating income as a percentage of its
revenues (operating margin percentage) was 24% in the third quarter of fiscal 2005, compared to 32%
in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The decline in operating margin percentage in the third
quarter of fiscal 2005 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 is primarily the result of a
37% increase in research and development expenses for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 as compared
to the third quarter of fiscal 2004, mainly related to increased investment in new integrated
circuit products and technology research and development initiatives to support lower cost phones,
multimedia applications, high-speed wireless Internet access and multiband, multimode, multinetwork
products including CDMA2000 1xEV-DO, WCDMA and HSDPA.
QTL Segment.
QTL revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 were $448 million, compared to
$436 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. QTLs earnings before taxes for the third
quarter of fiscal 2005 were $407 million, compared to $398 million for the third quarter of fiscal
2004. QTLs operating margin percentage was 91% in the third quarter of both fiscal 2005 and 2004.
The increase in both revenues and earnings before taxes primarily resulted from a $28 million
increase in royalties reported to us by our external licensees, partially offset by the effect of
using estimates to record royalty revenue in the third quarter of
fiscal 2004 and an adjustment due to
a royalty reimbursement claim by a certain licensee. Royalties reported
to us by external licensees were $401 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2005, compared to $373
million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The increase in royalties reported to us by external
licensees was primarily due to an increase in sales of CDMA products by licensees, resulting from
higher worldwide demand for CDMA products at higher average selling prices due primarily to the
growth of higher priced WCDMA sales and shifts in the geographic distribution of sales of CDMA
products. Revenues from amortization of license fees were $18 million in the third quarter of
fiscal 2005, compared to $15 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. In each of these
quarters, license fee revenue included $1 million related to equity received as license fees. Other
revenues were comprised of intersegment royalties.
During the periods preceding the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we estimated and recorded the
royalty revenues earned for sales by certain licensees (the Estimated Licensees) in the quarter in
which such sales occurred, but only when reasonable estimates of such amounts could be made. Not
all royalties earned were recorded based on estimates. Starting in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2004, we determined that, due to escalating and changing business trends, we no longer have the
ability to reliably estimate royalty revenues from the Estimated Licensees. These escalating and
changing trends included the commercial launches and global expansion of WCDMA networks, changes in
market share among licensees due to increased global competition, and increased variability in the
integrated circuit and finished product inventories of licensees. Starting in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2004, we began recognizing royalty revenues solely based on royalties reported by licensees
during the quarter. The change in the timing of recognizing royalty revenue was made prospectively
and had the initial one-time effect of reducing royalty revenues recorded in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2004. Accordingly, we did not estimate royalty revenues earned in the third quarter of
fiscal 2005.
QWI Segment.
QWI revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 were $164 million, compared
with $143 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. Revenues increased primarily due to a $12
million increase in QWBS revenue and an $8 million increase in QIS revenue. The increase in QWBS revenue is primarily
attributable to a $9 million increase in equipment revenue, net of a $6 million decrease in
amortization of deferred revenues related to historical equipment sales. QWBS shipped approximately
13,800 satellite-based systems and 19,600 terrestrial-based systems during the third quarter of
fiscal 2005, compared to approximately 10,200 satellite-based systems and 2,300 terrestrial-based
systems in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The increase in QIS revenue is primarily attributed to
an $11 million increase in fees related to our expanded BREW customer base and products.
QWIs earnings before taxes for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 were $12 million, compared to
$1 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. QWIs operating margin percentage was 7% in the
third quarter of fiscal 2005, compared to 1% in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The increases in
QWI earnings before taxes and operating margin
27
percentage were primarily due to an $8 million
increase in QIS gross margin largely resulting from the increase in fees related to our expanded
BREW customer base and products.
QSI Segment.
QSIs earnings before taxes from continuing operations for the third quarter of
fiscal 2005 were $30 million, compared to losses before taxes of $12 million for the third quarter
of fiscal 2004. During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, QSI recorded $46 million in realized gains
on marketable securities and other investments, compared to $7 million for the third quarter of
fiscal 2004. Equity in losses of investees decreased by $11 million primarily due to a decrease in
losses incurred by Inquam during the third quarter of fiscal 2005 as compared to the third quarter
of fiscal 2004, of which our share was $7 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 as compared
to $17 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. These improvements in QSIs earnings before
taxes from continuing operations were partially offset by a $12 million increase in MediaFLO
operating expenses and the effect of $4 million of other income recorded in the third quarter of
fiscal 2004 related to the transfer of a portion of the ADV to a wireless operator.
Our Segment Results for the First Nine Months of Fiscal 2005 Compared to the First Nine Months of
Fiscal 2004
The following should be read in conjunction with the first nine months financial results of
fiscal 2005 for each reporting segment. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 Segment Information.
QCT Segment.
QCT revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 were $2.38 billion,
compared to $2.26 billion for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. Equipment and services
revenues, primarily from MSM and accompanying RF integrated circuits, were $2.32 billion for the
first nine months of fiscal 2005, compared to $2.21 billion for the first nine months of fiscal
2004. The increase in MSM and accompanying RF integrated circuits revenue was comprised of an
increase of $302 million related to higher unit shipments, partially offset by a decrease of $208
million related to the net effects of reductions in average sales prices and changes in product
mix. Approximately 111 million MSM integrated circuits were sold during the first nine months of
fiscal 2005, compared to approximately 98 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
QCTs earnings before taxes for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 were $586 million,
compared to $776 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. QCTs operating margin
percentage was 25% in the first nine months of fiscal 2005, compared to 34% in the first nine
months of fiscal 2004. The decline in operating margin percentage in the first nine months of
fiscal 2005 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 is primarily the result of a 41%
increase in research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses during the
first nine months of fiscal 2005 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2004, mainly
related to increased investment in new integrated circuit products and technology research,
development and marketing initiatives to support multimedia applications, high-speed wireless
Internet access and multiband, multimode, multinetwork products including CDMA2000 1xEV-DO, WCDMA
and HSDPA.
QTL Segment.
QTL revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 were $1.34 billion,
compared to $1.18 billion for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. QTLs earnings before taxes for
the first nine months of fiscal 2005 were $1.21 billion, compared to $1.08 billion for the first
nine months of fiscal 2004. QTLs operating margin percentage was 90% in the first nine months of
fiscal 2005, compared to 92% in the first nine months of fiscal 2004. The increase in both revenues
and earnings before taxes primarily resulted from a $258 million increase in royalties reported to
us by our external licensees, partially offset by the effect of using estimates to record royalty
revenue in the first nine months of fiscal 2004. Royalties reported to us by external licensees
were $1.20 billion in the first nine months of fiscal 2005, compared to $939 million in the first
nine months of fiscal 2004. The increase in royalties reported to us by external licensees was
primarily due to an increase in sales of CDMA products by licensees, resulting from higher
worldwide demand for CDMA products at higher average selling prices due primarily to the growth of
higher priced WCDMA sales and shifts in the geographic distribution of sales of CDMA products.
Revenues from amortization of license fees were $52 million in the first nine months of fiscal
2005, compared to $45 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004. During the first nine months
of fiscal 2005 and 2004, license fee revenue included $3 million and $4 million, respectively,
related to equity received as license fees. Other revenues were comprised of intersegment
royalties.
QWI Segment.
QWI revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 were $473 million, compared
with $417 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. Revenues increased primarily due to a
$30 million increase in QIS revenue and a $29 million increase in QWBS revenue. The increase in QIS
revenue is primarily attributed to a $34 million increase in fees related to our expanded BREW
customer base and products. The increase in QWBS revenue is primarily attributable to a $20 million
increase in equipment revenue, net of an $18 million decrease in
28
amortization of deferred revenues
related to historical equipment sales, and a $9 million increase in messaging revenue as a result
of a larger installed base. QWBS shipped approximately 35,800 satellite-based systems and 45,000
terrestrial-based systems during the first nine months of fiscal 2005, compared to approximately
29,600 satellite-based systems and 5,100 terrestrial-based systems in the first nine months of
fiscal 2004.
QWIs earnings before taxes for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 were $37 million,
compared to $7 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. QWIs operating margin percentage
was 7% in the first nine months of fiscal 2005, compared to 2% in the first nine months of fiscal
2004. The increases in QWI earnings before taxes and operating margin percentage was primarily due
to a $30 million increase in QIS gross margin largely resulting from the increase in fees related
to our expanded BREW customer base and products.
QSI Segment.
QSIs earnings before taxes from continuing operations for the first nine months
of fiscal 2005 were $37 million, compared to losses before taxes from continuing operations of $42
million for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. During the first nine months of fiscal 2005, QSI
recorded $98 million in realized gains on marketable securities and other investments, compared to
$11 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. Equity in losses of investees decreased by
$30 million primarily due to a decrease in losses incurred by Inquam during the first nine months
of fiscal 2005 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2004, of which our share was $26
million for the first nine months of fiscal 2005 as compared to $51 million for the first nine
months of fiscal 2004. These improvements in QSIs earnings before taxes from continuing
operations were partially offset by a $27 million increase in MediaFLO operating expenses and an
$11 million decrease in interest income that resulted from the prepayment of the Pegaso debt
facility in the first quarter of fiscal 2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities were $7.9 billion at June 26, 2005, an
increase of $229 million from September 28, 2004. The increase was primarily the result of $1.7
billion in cash provided by operating activities and $236 million in net proceeds from the issuance
of common stock under our stock option and employee stock purchase plans, partially offset by $953
million in repurchases of our common stock under our stock repurchase program, $438 million in
capital expenditures, $377 million in dividends paid and $189 million invested in other entities
and acquisitions.
On March 8, 2005, we authorized the expenditure of up to $2 billion to repurchase shares of
our stock. Through July 19, 2005, we repurchased approximately 27,083,000 shares of our common
stock at a net aggregate cost of $953 million. In connection with this stock repurchase program, we
sold two put options, with expiration dates of September 6, 2005 and December 7, 2005, that may
require us to repurchase 11,500,000 shares at a net cost of $389 million (net of the premiums
received). At July 19, 2005, $659 million remains authorized for repurchases under our stock
repurchase program, which does not have an expiration date.
On March 8, 2005, we announced an increase in the dividend rate on our common stock from $0.07
to $0.09 per share. On July 7, 2005, we announced a cash dividend of $0.09 per share on our common
stock, payable on September 23, 2005 to stockholders of record as of August 26, 2005.
Accounts receivable increased by 25% during the third quarter of fiscal 2005. Days sales
outstanding, on a consolidated basis, were 41 days at June 26, 2005, compared to 32 days at March
27, 2005. The increases in accounts receivable and days sales outstanding were primarily due to the
contractual timing of cash receipts for royalty receivables, some of which are paid semi-annually.
We believe our current cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and cash generated
from operations will satisfy our expected working and other capital requirements for the
foreseeable future based on current business plans, including acquisitions, investments in other
companies and other assets to support the growth of our business, financing for customers of CDMA
infrastructure products in accordance with the agreements with Ericsson,
financing under agreements with CDMA telecommunications operators, other commitments, the
payment of dividends and possible additional stock repurchases. We started construction of two
facilities in San Diego, California in fiscal 2003, totaling approximately one million additional
square feet, to meet the requirements projected in our business plan. The remaining cost of these
new facilities is expected to be approximately $144 million through fiscal 2007. In October 2004,
we announced our plans to expand our current Network Operations Center in Las Vegas, Nevada, which
uses GPS and other technologies to track freight transportation and shipping nationwide. We expect
the cost of this expansion will be approximately $52 million through fiscal 2007.
We intend to continue our strategic investment activities to promote the worldwide adoption of
CDMA products and the growth of CDMA-based wireless data and wireless Internet products. As part of
these investment activities,
29
we may provide financing to facilitate the marketing and sale of CDMA equipment by authorized suppliers.
In the event additional needs or uses for cash arise, we may raise additional funds from a combination of
sources including potential debt and equity issuance.
Contractual Obligations
We have no significant contractual obligations not fully recorded on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets or fully disclosed in the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. We have
no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in S-K 303(a)(4)(ii).
At June 26, 2005, our outstanding contractual obligations included (in millions):
Contractual Obligations
Additional information regarding our financial commitments at June 26, 2005 is provided
in the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2 Composition of Certain Financial Statement Items,
Finance Receivables, Note 3 Investments in Other Entities and Note 7 Commitments and
Contingencies.
Future Accounting Requirements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued revised statement No.
123 (FAS 123R), Share-Based Payment, which requires companies to expense the estimated fair value
of employee stock options and similar awards. On April 14, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission adopted a new rule amending the compliance dates for FAS 123R. In accordance with the
new rule, the accounting provisions of FAS 123R will be effective for us beginning the first
quarter of fiscal 2006. We will adopt the provisions of FAS 123R using a modified prospective
application. Under modified prospective application, FAS 123R, which provides certain changes to
the method for valuing share-based compensation among other changes, will apply to new awards and
to awards that are outstanding on the effective date and are subsequently modified or cancelled.
Compensation expense for outstanding awards for which the requisite service had not been rendered
as of the effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period using the
compensation cost calculated for pro forma disclosure purposes under FAS 123. At June 26, 2005,
unamortized compensation expense related to outstanding unvested options, as determined in
accordance with FAS 123, that we expect to record during fiscal 2006 was approximately $401 million
before income taxes. We will incur additional expense during fiscal 2006 related to new awards
granted during the remainder of fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006 that cannot yet be quantified. We are in
the process of determining how the guidance regarding valuing share-based compensation as
prescribed in FAS 123R will be applied to valuing share-based awards granted after the effective
date and the impact that the recognition of compensation expense related to such awards will have
on our financial statements.
30
RISK FACTORS
You should consider each of the following factors as well as the other information in this
Quarterly Report in evaluating our business and our prospects. The risks and uncertainties
described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently
known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations. If
any of the following risks actually occur, our business and financial results could be harmed. In
that case the trading price of our common stock could decline. You should also refer to the other
information set forth in this Quarterly Report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 26, 2004, including our financial statements and the related notes.
Risks Related to Our Businesses
If CDMA technology is not widely deployed, our revenues may not grow as anticipated.
We focus our business primarily on developing, patenting and commercializing CDMA technology
for wireless telecommunications applications. Other digital wireless communications technologies,
particularly GSM technology, have been more widely deployed than CDMA technology. If CDMA
technology does not become the preferred wireless communications industry standard in the countries
where our products and those of our customers and licensees are sold, or if wireless operators do
not select CDMA for their networks or update their current networks to any CDMA-based third
generation technology, our business and financial results could suffer.
To increase our revenues and market share in future periods, we are dependent upon the
commercial deployment of third generation (3G) wireless communications equipment, products and
services based on our CDMA technology. Although network operators have commercially deployed
CDMA2000 1X and WCDMA, we cannot predict the timing or success of further commercial deployments of
CDMA2000 1X, WCDMA or other CDMA systems. If existing deployments are not commercially successful,
or if new commercial deployments of CDMA2000 1X, WCDMA or other CDMA systems are delayed or
unsuccessful, our business and financial results may be harmed. In addition, our business could be
harmed if network operators deploy competing technologies or switch existing networks from CDMA to
GSM or if network operators introduce new technologies. For example, a limited number of operators
have started testing OFDMA technology, a multi-carrier transmission technique not based on CDMA
technology, that divides the available spectrum into many carriers, with each carrier being
modulated at a low data rate relative to the combined rate for all carriers. Although we have
hundreds of issued or pending patents relating to applications of GPRS, EDGE, OFDM, OFDMA and MIMO
(multi in, multi out), there can be no assurance that our patent portfolio in these areas would be
as valuable as our CDMA portfolio.
Our business and the deployment of CDMA technology are dependent on the success of our
customers and licensees. Our customers and licensees may incur lower operating margins on
CDMA-based products than on products using alternative technologies due to greater competition in
the CDMA-based market, lack of product improvements or other factors. If CDMA phones and/or
infrastructure manufacturers exit the CDMA market, the deployment of CDMA technology could be
negatively affected, and our business could suffer.
Our three largest customers as of June 26, 2005 accounted for 39% and 40% of consolidated revenues
in the first nine months of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively, and 40% and 44% of consolidated
revenues in fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. The loss of any one of our major customers or any
reduction in the demand for devices utilizing our CDMA technology could reduce our revenues and
harm our ability to achieve or sustain desired levels of operating results.
QCT Segment.
The loss of any one of our QCT segments significant customers or the delay, even
if only temporary, or cancellation of significant orders from any of these customers would reduce
our revenues in the period of the cancellation or deferral and could harm our ability to achieve or
sustain desired levels of profitability. Accordingly, unless and until our QCT segment diversifies
and expands its customer base, our future success will significantly depend upon the timing and
size of future purchase orders, if any, from these customers. Factors that may impact the size and
timing of orders from customers of our QCT segment include, among others, the following:
31
QTL Segment.
Our QTL segment derives royalty revenues based upon sales of CDMA products by our
licensees. Although we have over 125 licensees, we derive a significant portion of our royalty
revenue from a smaller number of licensees. Our future success depends upon the ability of our
licensees to develop, introduce and deliver high volume products that achieve and sustain market
acceptance. We have little or no control over the sales efforts of our licensees, and we cannot
assure you that our licensees will be successful or that the demand for wireless communications
devices and services offered by our licensees will continue to increase. Any reduction in the
demand for or any delay in the development, introduction or delivery of wireless communications
devices utilizing our CDMA technology could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Reductions in the average selling price of wireless communications devices utilizing our CDMA
technology, without a comparable increase in the volumes of such devices sold, could have a
material adverse effect on our business. Weakness in the value of foreign currencies in which our
customers products are sold may reduce the amount of royalties payable to us in U.S. dollars.
Royalties under our license agreements are generally payable to us for the life of the patents
that we license under our agreements. The licenses granted to and
from us under a number of our license
agreements include only patents that are either filed or issued prior to a certain date. As a
result, there are agreements with some licensees where later patents are not licensed by or to us
under our license agreements. In order to license any such later patents, we will need to extend or
modify our license agreements or enter into new license agreements
with such licensees. Although in the past we have amended many of our
license agreements to include later patents without affecting the
material terms and conditions of our license agreements, there is no
assurance that we will be able to modify our license agreements in
the future to license any such later patents or extend such date(s) to
incorporate later patents without affecting the material terms and conditions of our license
agreements with such licensees.
Changes in financial accounting standards related to share-based payments are expected to have a
significant effect on our reported results.
The FASB recently issued a revised standard that requires that we record compensation expense
in the statement of operations for share-based payments, such as employee stock options, using the
fair value method. The adoption of the new standard is expected to have a significant effect on our
reported earnings, although it will not affect our cash flows, and could adversely impact our
ability to provide accurate guidance on our future reported financial results due to the
variability of the factors used to estimate the values of share-based payments. As a result, the
adoption of the new standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 could negatively affect our stock
price and our stock price volatility.
We depend upon a limited number of third party manufacturers to provide component parts,
subassemblies and finished goods for our products. Any disruptions in the operations of, or the
loss of, any of these third parties could harm our ability to meet our delivery obligations to our
customers and increase our cost of sales.
Our ability to meet customer demands depends, in part, on our ability to obtain timely and
adequate delivery of parts and components from our suppliers and available manufacturing capacity.
A reduction or interruption in component supply, an inability of our partners to react to rapid
shifts in demand or a significant increase in component prices could have a material adverse effect
on our business or profitability. Component shortages could adversely affect our ability and that
of our customers to ship products on a timely basis and our customers demand for our products. Any
such shipment delays or declines in demand could reduce our revenues and harm our ability to
achieve or sustain desired levels of profitability. Additionally, failure to meet customer demand
in a timely manner could damage our reputation and harm our customer relationships potentially
resulting in reduced market share.
32
QCT Segment.
We outsource all of the manufacturing and assembly, and most of the testing, of
our integrated circuits. We depend upon a limited number of third parties to perform these
functions, some of which are only available from single sources with which we do not have long-term
contracts. IBM, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. and United Microelectronics are the primary
foundry partners for our family of baseband integrated circuits. IBM, Freescale (formerly Motorola
Semiconductor) and Atmel are the primary foundry partners for our family of radio frequency and
analog integrated circuits. Our reliance on a sole-source vendor primarily occurs during the
start-up phase of a new product. Once a new product reaches a significant volume level, we
typically establish alternative suppliers for technologies that we consider critical. Our reliance
on sole or limited-source vendors involves risks. These risks include possible shortages of
capacity, product performance shortfalls and reduced controls over delivery schedules,
manufacturing capability, quality assurance, quantity and costs. During fiscal 2004 and the first
quarter of fiscal 2005, we experienced supply constraints which resulted in our inability to meet
certain customer demands. These constraints substantially diminished during the second quarter of
fiscal 2005 and were alleviated in the third quarter of fiscal 2005, with improvements to supply
more closely aligning with our current customer demand profile. To improve the supply and delivery
of parts and components from our suppliers, we worked with our existing suppliers to increase
available manufacturing capacity and increased and extended our firm orders to our suppliers.
Additionally, we continue to evaluate potential new suppliers to augment our future needs. We work
closely with customers to expedite their processes for evaluating new products from our foundry
suppliers; however, in some instances, transition to new product supply may cause a temporary
decline in shipments of specific products to individual customers. To the extent that we do not
have firm commitments from our manufacturers over a specific time period or in any specific
quantity, our manufacturers may allocate, and in the past have allocated, capacity to the
production of other products while reducing deliveries to us on short notice.
Our operations may also be harmed by lengthy or recurring disruptions at any of the facilities
of our manufacturers and may be harmed by disruptions in the distribution channels from our
suppliers and to our customers. These disruptions may include labor strikes, work stoppages,
widespread illness, terrorism, war, political unrest, fire, earthquake, flooding or other natural
disasters. These disruptions could cause significant delays in shipments until we are able to shift
the products from an affected manufacturer to another manufacturer. The loss of a significant
third-party manufacturer or the inability of a third-party manufacturer to meet performance and
quality specifications or delivery schedules could harm our ability to meet our delivery
obligations to our customers.
In addition, one or more of our manufacturers may obtain licenses from us to manufacture CDMA
integrated circuits that compete with our products. In this event, the manufacturer could elect to
allocate scarce components and manufacturing capacity to their own products and reduce deliveries
to us. In the event of a loss of or a decision to change a key third-party manufacturer, qualifying
a new manufacturer and commencing volume production or testing could involve delay and expense,
resulting in lost revenues, reduced operating margins and possible loss of customers.
QWI Segment.
Several of the critical subassemblies and parts used in our QWBS divisions
existing and proposed products are currently available only from third-party single or limited
sources. These include items such as electronic and radio frequency components, and other
sophisticated parts and subassemblies which are used in the OmniTRACS, TruckMAIL, OmniExpress, T2
Untethered TrailerTRACS, GlobalTRACS and EutelTRACS products. These third parties include companies
such as Tyco International (M/A Com), Rakon, Mini-Circuits, Cambridge Tool & Mfg., PCTEL Antenna
Products Group, Inc., American Design, Deutsch ECD, PCI Limited, KeyTronic EMS, Danaher Motors,
Fujitsu Corporation, Tectrol, uBlox, Navman NZ, Eagle-Picher Industries, Centurion Wireless
Technologies, Sony/Ericsson and Sharp Corporation. Our reliance on sole or limited source vendors
involves risks. These risks include possible shortages of certain key components, product
performance shortfalls, and reduced control over delivery schedules, manufacturing capability,
quality and costs. In the event of a long-term supply interruption, alternate sources could be
developed in a majority of the cases. The inability to obtain adequate quantities of significant
compliant materials on a timely basis could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results, liquidity and financial position.
We are subject to the risks of our and our licensees conducting business outside the United States.
A significant part of our strategy involves our continued pursuit of growth opportunities in a
number of international markets. We market, sell and service our products internationally. We have
established sales offices around the world. We expect to continue to expand our international sales
operations and enter new international markets. This expansion will require significant management
attention and financial resources to successfully develop direct and indirect international sales
and support channels, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful or that our expenditures
in this effort will not exceed the amount of any resulting revenues. If we are not
33
able to maintain or increase international market demand for our products and technologies, we
may not be able to maintain a desired rate of growth in our business.
Our international customers sell their products to markets throughout the world, including
China, India, Japan, Korea, North America, South America and Europe. We distinguish revenues from
external customers by geographic areas based on customer location. Consolidated revenues from
international customers as a percentage of total revenues were 81% and 79% in the first nine months
of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively and 79% and 77% in fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Because most of our foreign sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, our products and those of our
customers and licensees that are sold in U.S. dollars become less price-competitive in
international markets if the value of the U.S. dollar increases relative to foreign currencies.
In many international markets, barriers to entry are created by long-standing relationships
between our potential customers and their local service providers and protective regulations,
including local content and service requirements. In addition, our pursuit of international growth
opportunities may require significant investments for an extended period before we realize returns,
if any, on our investments. Our business could be adversely affected by a variety of uncontrollable
and changing factors, including:
In addition to general risks associated with our international sales, licensing activities and
operations, we are also subject to risks specific to the individual countries in which we do
business. We cannot be certain that the laws and policies of any country with respect to
intellectual property enforcement or licensing, issuance of wireless licenses or the adoption of
standards will not be changed in a way detrimental to our licensing program or to the sale or use
of our products or technology. Declines in currency values in selected regions may adversely affect
our operating results because our products and those of our customers and licensees may become more
expensive to purchase in the countries of the affected currencies. During the first nine months of
fiscal 2005, 38% and 21% of our revenues were from customers and licensees based in South Korea and
Japan, respectively, as compared to 43% and 19%, respectively, during the first nine months of
fiscal 2004. During fiscal 2004, 43% and 18% of our revenues were from customers and licensees
based in South Korea and Japan, respectively, as compared to 45% and 15% during fiscal 2003. These
customers based in South Korea and Japan sell their products to markets worldwide, including Japan,
South Korea, North America, South America and Europe. A significant downturn in the economies of
Asian countries where many of our customers and licensees are located, particularly the economies
of South Korea and Japan, or the economies of the major markets they serve would materially harm
our business.
34
The wireless markets in China and India, among others, represent growth opportunities for us.
If wireless carriers in China or India, or the governments of China or India, make technology
deployment or other decisions that result in actions that are adverse to the expansion of CDMA
technologies our business could be harmed.
We are subject to risks in certain global markets in which wireless operators provide
subsidies on phone sales to their customers. Increases in phone prices that negatively impact phone
sales can result from changes in regulatory policies related to phone subsidies. Limitations or
changes in policy on phone subsidies in South Korea, Japan, China and other countries may have
additional negative impacts on our revenues.
We expect that royalty revenues from international licensees based upon sales of their
products outside of the United States will continue to represent a significant portion of our total
revenues in the future. Our royalty revenues from international licensees are denominated in U.S.
dollars. To the extent that such licensees products are sold in foreign currencies, any royalties
that we derive as a result of such sales are subject to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. In
addition, if the effective price of products sold by our customers were to increase as a result of
fluctuations in the exchange rate of the relevant currencies, demand for the products could fall,
which in turn would reduce our royalty revenues.
Currency fluctuations could negatively affect future product sales or royalty revenue, harm our
ability to collect receivables, or increase the U.S. dollar cost of the activities of our foreign
subsidiaries and international strategic investments.
We are exposed to risk from fluctuations in currencies, which may change over time as our
business practices evolve, that could impact our operating results, liquidity and financial
condition. We operate and invest globally. Adverse movements in currency exchange rates may
negatively affect our business due to a number of situations, including the following:
We may engage in strategic transactions that could result in significant charges or management
disruption and fail to enhance stockholder value.
From time to time, we engage in strategic transactions with the goal of maximizing stockholder
value. In the past we have acquired businesses, entered into joint ventures and made strategic
investments in or loans to CDMA wireless operators, early stage companies, or venture funds to
support global adoption of CDMA and the use of the wireless Internet. Most of our strategic
investments entail a high degree of risk and will not become liquid until more than one year from
the date of investment, if at all. We cannot assure you that our strategic investments (either
those
35
we currently hold or future investments) will generate financial returns or that they will
result in increased adoption or continued use of CDMA technologies.
We will continue to evaluate potential strategic transactions and alternatives that we believe
may enhance stockholder value. These potential future transactions may include a variety of
different business arrangements, including acquisitions, spin-offs, strategic partnerships, joint
ventures, restructurings, divestitures, business combinations and equity or debt investments.
Although our goal is to maximize stockholder value, such transactions may impair stockholder value
or otherwise adversely affect our business and the trading price of our stock. Any such transaction
may require us to incur non-recurring or other charges and/or to consolidate or record our equity
in losses and may pose significant integration challenges and/or management and business
disruptions, any of which could harm our operating results and business.
Defects or errors in our products and services or in products made by our suppliers could harm our
relations with our customers and expose us to liability. Similar problems related to the products
of our customers or licensees could harm our business.
Our products are inherently complex and may contain defects and errors that are detected only
when the products are in use. Further, because our products and services are responsible for
critical functions in our customers products and/or networks, such defects or errors could have a
serious impact on our customers, which could damage our reputation, harm our customer relationships
and expose us to liability. Defects or impurities in our components, materials or software or those
used by our customers or licensees, equipment failures or other difficulties could adversely affect
our ability and that of our customers and licensees to ship products on a timely basis as well as
customer or licensee demand for our products. Any such shipment delays or declines in demand could
reduce our revenues and harm our ability to achieve or sustain desired levels of profitability. We
and our customers or licensees may also experience component or software failures or defects which
could require significant product recalls, reworks and/or repairs which are not covered by warranty
reserves and which could consume a substantial portion of the capacity of our third-party
manufacturers or those of our customers or licensees. Resolving any defect or failure related
issues could consume financial and/or engineering resources that could affect future product
release schedules. Additionally, a defect or failure in our products or the products of our
customers or licensees could harm our reputation and/or adversely affect the growth of 3G wireless
markets.
Global economic conditions that impact the wireless communications industry could negatively affect
our revenues and operating results.
Global economic weakness can have wide-ranging effects on markets that we serve, particularly
wireless communications equipment manufacturers and network operators. We cannot predict negative
events, such as war, that may have adverse effects on the economy or on phone inventories at CDMA
equipment manufacturers and operators. The continued threat of terrorism and heightened security
and military action in response to this threat, or any future acts of terrorism, may cause further
disruptions to the global economy and to the wireless communications industry and create further
uncertainties. Further, an economic recovery may not benefit us in the near term. If it does not,
our ability to increase or maintain our revenues and operating results may be impaired. In
addition, because we intend to continue to make significant investments in research and development
and to maintain extensive ongoing customer service and support capability, any decline in the rate
of growth of our revenues will have a significant adverse impact on our operating results.
Our industry is subject to competition that could result in decreased demand for our products and
the products of our customers and licensees and/or declining average selling prices for our
licensees products and our products, negatively affecting our revenues and operating results.
We currently face significant competition in our markets and expect that competition will
continue. Competition in the telecommunications market is affected by various factors, including:
36
This competition may result in reduced average selling prices for our products and those of
our customers and licensees. Reductions in the average selling price of our licensees products,
unless offset by an increase in volumes, generally result in reduced royalties payable to us. While
pricing pressures from competition may, to a large extent, be mitigated by the introduction of new
features and functionality in our licensees products, there is no guarantee that such mitigation
will occur. We anticipate that additional competitors will enter our markets as a result of growth
opportunities in wireless telecommunications, the trend toward global expansion by foreign and
domestic competitors, technological and public policy changes and relatively low barriers to entry
in selected segments of the industry.
Companies that promote non-CDMA technologies (e.g. GSM and WiMax) and companies that design
competing CDMA integrated circuits are included amongst our competitors. Examples of such
competitors (some of whom are partners of ours in other areas) include Ericsson, Freescale, Intel,
NEC, Nokia, Samsung, Texas Instruments and VIA Telecom. With respect to our OmniTRACS, TruckMAIL,
OmniExpress, T2 Untethered TrailerTRACS, GlobalTRACS, QConnect, OmniOne, EutelTRACS and LINQ
products and services, our existing competitors are aggressively pricing their products and
services and could continue to do so in the future. In addition, these competitors are offering new
value-added products and services similar in many cases to those we have developed or are
developing. Emergence of new competitors, particularly those offering low cost terrestrial-based
products and current as well as future satellite-based products, may impact margins and intensify
competition in current and new markets. Similarly, some original equipment manufacturers of trucks
and truck components are beginning to offer built-in, on-board communications and position location
reporting products that may impact our margins and intensify competition in our current and new
markets. Some potential competitors of our QWBS business, if they are successful, may harm our
ability to compete in certain markets.
Many of these current and potential competitors have advantages over us, including:
As a result of these and other factors, our competitors may be more successful than us. In
addition, we anticipate additional competitors will enter the market for products based on 3G
standards. These competitors may have more established relationships and distribution channels in
markets not currently deploying wireless communications technology. These competitors also may have
established or may establish financial or strategic relationships among themselves or with our
existing or potential customers, resellers or other third parties. These relationships may affect
our customers decisions to purchase products or license technology from us. Accordingly, new
competitors or alliances among competitors could emerge and rapidly acquire significant market
share to our detriment.
Our operating results are subject to substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations and to market
downturns.
Our revenues, earnings and other operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past
and may fluctuate significantly in the future. General economic or other conditions causing a
downturn in the market for our products or technology, affecting the timing of customer orders or
causing cancellations or rescheduling of orders could also adversely affect our operating results.
Moreover, our customers may change delivery schedules or cancel or reduce orders without incurring
significant penalties and generally are not subject to minimum purchase requirements.
Our future operating results will be affected by many factors, including, but not limited to:
our ability to retain existing or secure anticipated customers or licensees, both domestically and
internationally; our ability to develop, introduce and market new technology, products and services
on a timely basis; management of inventory by us and
37
our customers and their customers in response to shifts in market demand; changes in the mix
of technology and products developed, licensed, produced and sold; seasonal customer demand; and
other factors described elsewhere in this report and in these risk factors. Our corporate cash
investments represent a significant asset that may be subject to fluctuating or even negative
returns depending upon interest rate movements and financial market conditions in fixed income and
equity securities.
These factors affecting our future operating results are difficult to forecast and could harm
our quarterly or annual operating results. If our operating results fail to meet the financial
guidance we provide to investors or the expectations of investment analysts or investors in any
period, securities class action litigation could be brought against us and/or the market price of
our common stock could decline.
Our stock price may be volatile.
The stock market in general, and the stock prices of technology-based and wireless
communications companies in particular, have experienced volatility that often has been unrelated
to the operating performance of any specific public company. The market price of our common stock
has fluctuated in the past and is likely to fluctuate in the future as well. Factors that may have
a significant impact on the market price of our stock include:
Our future earnings and stock price may be subject to volatility, particularly on a quarterly
basis. Shortfalls in our revenues or earnings in any given period relative to the levels expected
by securities analysts could immediately, significantly and adversely affect the trading price of
our common stock.
From time to time, we may repurchase our common stock at prices that may later be higher than
the market value of the stock on the repurchase date. This could result in a loss of value for
stockholders if new shares are issued at lower prices.
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company
following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. Due to changes in the
volatility of our stock price, we may be the target of securities litigation in the future.
Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert managements attention and
resources. In addition, stock volatility may be precipitated by failure to meet earnings
expectations or other factors, such as the potential uncertainty in future reported earnings
created by the adoption of option expensing and the related valuation models used to determine such
expense.
38
Our industry is subject to rapid technological change, and we must keep pace to compete
successfully.
New technological innovations generally require a substantial investment before they are
commercially viable. We intend to continue to make substantial investments in developing new
products and technologies, and it is possible that our development efforts will not be successful
and that our new technologies will not result in meaningful revenues. In particular, we intend to
continue to invest significant resources in developing integrated circuit products to support
high-speed wireless Internet access and multimode, multiband, multinetwork operation and multimedia
applications which encompass development of graphical display, camera and video capabilities, as
well as higher computational capability and lower power on-chip computers and signal processors.
While our research and development activities have resulted in inventions relating to applications
of GPRS, EDGE, OFDM, OFDMA and MIMO and hundreds of issued or pending patent applications, there
can be no assurance that our patent portfolio in these areas would be as valuable as our CDMA
portfolio. We will also continue our significant development efforts with respect to our BREW
applications development platform. We also continue to invest in the development of our MediaFLO
media distribution system and FLO technology for delivery of low cost multimedia content to
multiple subscribers. We cannot assure you that the revenues generated from these products will
meet our expectations.
The market for our products and technology is characterized by many factors, including:
Our future success will depend on our ability to continue to develop and introduce new
products, technology and enhancements on a timely basis. Our future success will also depend on our
ability to keep pace with technological developments, protect our intellectual property, satisfy
varying customer requirements, price our products competitively and achieve market acceptance. The
introduction of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards
could render our existing products and technology, and products and technology currently under
development, obsolete and unmarketable. If we fail to anticipate or respond adequately to
technological developments or customer requirements, or experience any significant delays in
development, introduction or shipment of our products and technology in commercial quantities,
demand for our products and our customers and licensees products that use our technology could
decrease, and our competitive position could be damaged.
The enforcement and protection of our intellectual property rights may be expensive and could
divert our valuable resources.
We rely primarily on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as
nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary
information, technologies and processes, including our patent portfolio. Policing unauthorized use
of our products and technologies is difficult and time consuming. We cannot be certain that the
steps we have taken will prevent the misappropriation or unauthorized use of our proprietary
information and technologies, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our
proprietary rights as fully or as readily as United States laws.
The vast majority of our patents and patent applications relate to our CDMA digital wireless
communications technology and much of the remainder of our patents and patent applications relate
to our other technologies and products. Litigation may be required to enforce our intellectual
property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of proprietary
rights of others. As a result of any such litigation, we could lose our proprietary rights or incur
substantial unexpected operating costs. Any action we take to enforce our intellectual property
rights could be costly and could absorb significant management time and attention, which, in turn,
could negatively impact our operating results. In addition, failure to protect our trademark rights
could impair our brand identity.
Claims by other companies that we infringe their intellectual property or that patents on which we
rely are invalid could adversely affect our business.
From time to time, companies may assert patent, copyright and other intellectual proprietary
rights against our products or products using our technologies or other technologies used in our
industry. These claims may result in our involvement in litigation. We may not prevail in such
litigation given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in intellectual property
litigation. If any of our products were found to infringe on another companys
39
intellectual property rights, we could be required to redesign our products or license such
rights and/or pay damages or other compensation to such other company. If we were unable to
redesign our products or license such intellectual property rights used in our products, we could
be prohibited from making and selling such products.
In addition, as the number of competitors in our market increases and the functionality of our
products is enhanced and overlaps with the products of other companies, we may become subject to
claims of infringement or misappropriation of the intellectual property rights of others. Any
claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming to address, result in costly litigation,
divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel or cause product release or shipment
delays, any of which could have a material adverse effect upon our operating results. In any
potential dispute involving other companies patents or other intellectual property, our licensees
could also become the targets of litigation. Any such litigation could severely disrupt the
business of our licensees, which in turn could hurt our relations with our licensees and cause our
revenues to decrease.
A number of other companies have claimed to own patents essential to various CDMA standards,
GSM standards and implementations of OFDM and OFDMA systems. If we or other product manufacturers
are required to obtain additional licenses and/or pay royalties to one or more patent holders, this
could have a material adverse effect on the commercial implementation of our CDMA or multi-mode
products and technologies and our profitability.
Other companies or entities also may commence actions seeking to establish the invalidity of
our patents. In the event that one or more of our patents are challenged, a court may invalidate
the patent or determine that the patent is not enforceable, which could harm our competitive
position. If any of our key patents are invalidated, or if the scope of the claims in any of these
patents is limited by court decision, we could be prevented from licensing the invalidated or
limited portion of such patents. Even if such a patent challenge is not successful, it could be
expensive and time consuming to address, divert management attention from our business and harm our
reputation.
Potential tax liabilities could adversely affect our results.
We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions.
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the
ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate
tax determination is uncertain. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities. Although we
believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related
litigation could be materially different than that which is reflected in historical income tax
provisions and accruals. In such case, a material effect on our income tax provision and net income
in the period or periods in which that determination is made could result.
The high amount of capital required to obtain radio frequency licenses and deploy and expand
wireless networks could slow the growth of the wireless communications industry and adversely
affect our business.
Our growth is dependent upon the increased use of wireless communications services that
utilize our technology. In order to provide wireless communications services, wireless operators
must obtain rights to use specific radio frequencies. The allocation of frequencies is regulated in
the United States and other countries throughout the world and limited spectrum space is allocated
to wireless communications services. Industry growth may be affected by the amount of capital
required to: obtain licenses to use new frequencies; deploy wireless networks to offer voice and
data services; and expand wireless networks to grow voice and data services. Over the last several
years, the amount paid for spectrum licenses has increased significantly, particularly for
frequencies used in connection with 3G technology. The significant cost of licenses and wireless
networks may slow the growth of the industry if wireless operators are unable to obtain or service
the additional capital necessary to implement or expand 3G wireless networks. Our growth could be
adversely affected if this occurs.
If we experience product liability claims or recalls, we may incur significant expenses and
experience decreased demand for our products.
Testing, manufacturing, marketing and use of our products and those of our licensees and
customers entails the risk of product liability. Although we believe our product liability
insurance will be adequate to protect against product liability claims, we cannot assure you that
we will be able to continue to maintain such insurance at a reasonable cost or in sufficient
amounts to protect us against losses due to product liability. Our inability to maintain insurance
at an acceptable cost or to otherwise protect against potential product liability claims could
prevent or inhibit the commercialization of our products and those of our licensees and customers
and harm our future operating results. Furthermore, not all losses associated with alleged product
failure are insurable. In addition, a product liability claim or recall, whether against us, our
licensees or customers, could harm our reputation and result in decreased demand for our products.
40
If wireless phones pose safety risks, we may be subject to new regulations, and demand for our
products and those of our licensees and customers may decrease.
Concerns over the effects of radio frequency emissions, even if unfounded, may have the effect
of discouraging the use of wireless phones, which would decrease demand for our products and those
of our licensees and customers. In recent years, the FCC and foreign regulatory agencies have
updated the guidelines and methods they use for evaluating radio frequency emissions from radio
equipment, including wireless phones. In addition, interest groups have requested that the FCC
investigate claims that wireless communications technologies pose health concerns and cause
interference with airbags, hearing aids and medical devices. Concerns have also been expressed over
the possibility of safety risks due to a lack of attention associated with the use of wireless
phones while driving. Any legislation that may be adopted in response to these expressions of
concern could reduce demand for our products and those of our licensees and customers in the United
States as well as foreign countries.
Our business depends on the availability of satellite and other networks for our OmniTRACS,
TruckMAIL, EutelTRACS, OmniExpress, LINQ, T2 Untethered TrailerTRACS, GlobalTRACS, QConnect and
OmniOne systems and other communications products.
Our OmniTRACS system currently operates in the United States market on leased Ku-band
satellite transponders. Our primary data satellite transponder and position reporting satellite
transponder lease runs through October 2006 and includes transponder and satellite protection
(back-up capacity in the event of a transponder or satellite failure). Based on system capacity
analysis, we believe that the United States OmniTRACS operations will not require additional
transponder capacity through fiscal 2006. We believe that in the event additional transponder
capacity would be required in fiscal 2006 or in future years, additional capacity will be available
on acceptable terms. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to acquire additional
transponder capacity on acceptable terms in a timely manner. A failure to maintain adequate
satellite capacity would harm our business, operating results, liquidity and financial position.
Our OmniExpress, LINQ, T2 Untethered TrailerTRACS, GlobalTRACS, QConnect and OmniOne systems
are terrestrial-based products and thus rely on various wireless terrestrial communications
networks operated by third parties. We believe these terrestrial networks will be available for our
products; however, we cannot assure you that these networks will continue to be available to us or
that they will perform adequately for our needs. The unavailability or nonperformance of these
network systems could harm our business.
Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures.
Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a
Disaster Recovery Plan for our internal information technology networking systems, our systems are
vulnerable to damages from computer viruses, unauthorized access, energy blackouts, natural
disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures. Any system failure, accident or security
breach that causes interruptions in our operations or to our customers or licensees operations
could result in a material disruption to our business. To the extent that any disruption or
security breach results in a loss or damage to our customers data or applications, or
inappropriate disclosure of confidential information, we may incur liability as a result. In
addition, we may incur additional costs to remedy the damages caused by these disruptions or
security breaches.
Message transmissions for domestic OmniTRACS, TruckMAIL, T2 Untethered TrailerTRACS,
OmniExpress, GlobalTRACS, QConnect and OmniOne operations are formatted and processed at the
Network Operations Center in San Diego, California, which we operate, with a fully redundant backup
Network Operations Center located in Las Vegas, Nevada. Our Network Operations Center operations
are subject to system failures, which could interrupt the services and have a material adverse
effect on our operating results.
From time to time, we install new or upgraded business management systems. To the extent such
systems fail or are not properly implemented, we may experience material disruptions to our
business that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We cannot provide assurance that we will continue to declare dividends at all or in any particular
amounts.
We intend to continue to pay quarterly dividends subject to capital availability and periodic
determinations that cash dividends are in the best interest of the stockholders. Our dividend
policy may be affected by, among other items, our views on potential future capital requirements,
including those related to research and development, creation and expansion of sales distribution
channels and investments and acquisitions, legal risks, stock repurchase programs, changes in
Federal income tax law and changes to our business model. Our dividend policy may change
41
from time to time, and we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to declare dividends
at all or in any particular amounts. A change in our dividend policy could have a negative effect
on our stock price.
Government regulation may adversely affect our business.
Our products and those of our customers and licensees are subject to various regulations,
including FCC regulations in the United States and other international regulations, as well as the
specifications of national, regional and international standards bodies. Changes in the regulation
of our activities, including changes in the allocation of available spectrum by the United States
government and other governments or exclusion or limitation of our technology or products by a
government or standards body, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating
results, liquidity and financial position.
Our business and operating results will be harmed if we are unable to manage growth in our
business.
Certain of our businesses have experienced periods of rapid growth that have placed, and may
continue to place, significant demands on our managerial, operational and financial resources. In
order to manage this growth, we must continue to improve and expand our management, operational and
financial systems and controls, including quality control and delivery and service capabilities. We
also need to continue to expand, train and manage our employee base. We must carefully manage
research and development capabilities and production and inventory levels to meet product demand,
new product introductions and product and technology transitions. We cannot assure you that we will
be able to timely and effectively meet that demand and maintain the quality standards required by
our existing and potential customers and licensees.
In addition, inaccuracies in our demand forecasts, or failure of the systems used to develop
the forecasts, could quickly result in either insufficient or excessive inventories and
disproportionate overhead expenses. If we ineffectively manage our growth or are unsuccessful in
recruiting and retaining personnel, our business and operating results will be harmed.
We may not be able to attract and retain qualified employees.
Our future success depends largely upon the continued service of our Board members, executive
officers and other key management and technical personnel. Our success also depends on our ability
to continue to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. In addition, implementing our
product and business strategy requires specialized engineering and other talent, and our revenues
are highly dependent on technological and product innovations. Key employees represent a
significant asset, and the competition for these employees is intense in the wireless
communications industry. We continue to anticipate significant increases in human resources,
particularly in engineering resources, through the remainder of fiscal 2005. If we are unable to
attract and retain the qualified employees that we need, our business may be harmed.
We may have particular difficulty attracting and retaining key personnel in periods of poor
operating performance given the significant use of incentive compensation by our competitors. We do
not have employment agreements with our key management personnel and do not maintain key person
life insurance on any of our personnel. The loss of one or more of our key employees or our
inability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel could negatively impact our ability
to design, develop and commercialize our products and technology.
Since our inception, we have used stock options and other long-term equity incentives as a
fundamental component of our employee compensation packages. We believe that stock options and
other long-term equity incentives directly motivate our employees to maximize long-term stockholder
value and, through the use of long-term vesting, encourage employees to remain with us. To the
extent that new regulations make it less attractive to grant options to employees, we may incur
increased compensation costs, change our equity compensation strategy or find it difficult to
attract, retain and motivate employees, each of which could materially and adversely affect our
business.
Future changes in financial accounting standards or practices or existing taxation rules or
practices may cause adverse unexpected revenue fluctuations and affect our reported results of
operations.
A change in accounting standards or practices or a change in existing taxation rules or
practices can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting
of transactions completed before the change is effective. New accounting pronouncements and
taxation rules and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements and taxation practice have
occurred and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current
practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way we conduct our business.
42
Compliance with changing regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure may result in
additional expenses.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public
disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations and NASDAQ National
Market rules, are creating uncertainty for companies such as ours. These new or changed laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of
specificity, and as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is
provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty regarding
compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance
practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public
disclosure. As a result, our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards have
resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses
and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance
activities. In particular, our efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and the related regulations regarding our required assessment of our internal controls over
financial reporting and our independent registered public accounting firms audit of that
assessment has required the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources. In
addition, it has become more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer
liability insurance, and we have purchased reduced coverage at substantially higher cost than in
the past. We expect these efforts to require the continued commitment of significant resources.
Further, our board members, chief executive officer and chief financial officer could face an
increased risk of personal liability in connection with the performance of their duties. As a
result, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified board members and executive
officers, which could harm our business. If our efforts to comply with new or changed laws,
regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due
to ambiguities related to practice, our reputation may be harmed.
Our stockholder rights plan, certificate of incorporation and Delaware law could adversely affect
the performance of our stock.
Our certificate of incorporation provides for cumulative voting in the election of directors.
In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides for a classified board of directors and
includes a provision that requires the approval of holders of at least 66 2/3% of our voting stock
as a condition to a merger or certain other business transactions with, or proposed by, a holder of
15% or more of our voting stock. This approval is not required in cases where certain of our
directors approve the transaction or where certain minimum price criteria and other procedural
requirements are met. Our certificate of incorporation also requires the approval of holders of at
least 66 2/3% of our voting stock to amend or change the provisions mentioned relating to the
classified board, cumulative voting or the transaction approval. Under our bylaws, stockholders are
not permitted to call special meetings of our stockholders. Finally, our certificate of
incorporation provides that any action required or permitted by our stockholders must be effected
at a duly called annual or special meeting rather than by any consent in writing.
The classified board, transaction approval, special meeting and other charter provisions may
discourage certain types of transactions involving an actual or potential change in our control.
These provisions may also discourage certain types of transactions in which our stockholders might
otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices and may limit our
stockholders ability to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests.
Further, we have distributed a dividend of one right for each outstanding share of our common
stock pursuant to the terms of our preferred share purchase rights plan. These rights will cause
substantial dilution to the ownership of a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not
approved by our Board of Directors and may have the effect of deterring hostile takeover attempts.
In addition, our Board of Directors has the authority to fix the rights and preferences of and
issue shares of preferred stock. This right may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change
in our control without action by our stockholders.
43
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Financial market risks related to interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity
prices are described in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. At June 26, 2005, there have been no
other material changes to the market risks described at September 26, 2004 except as described
below. Additionally, we do not anticipate any other near-term changes in the nature of our market
risk exposures or in managements objectives and strategies with respect to managing such
exposures.
Interest Rate Risk.
We have investment and non-investment grade fixed income securities
consisting of cash equivalents and investments in marketable debt securities. Changes in the
general level of United States interest rates can affect the principal values and yields of fixed
income investments. The following table provides comparative information about our fixed income
securities, including principal cash flows, weighted average yield and contractual maturity dates.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Equity Price Risk.
We hold a diversified portfolio of marketable securities and equity
mutual fund shares subject to equity price risk. The recorded values of marketable equity
securities increased to $1.03 billion at June 26, 2005 from $765 million at September 26, 2004. The
recorded value of equity mutual fund shares increased to $389 million at June 26, 2005 from $296
million at September 26, 2004. Our diversified portfolios concentrations in specific companies and
industry segments may vary over time, and changes in concentrations may affect the portfolios
price volatility. A 10% decrease in the market price of our marketable equity securities and equity
mutual fund shares at June 26, 2005 would cause a corresponding 10% decrease in the carrying
amounts of these securities, or $142 million.
We sold two put options, which expire on September 6, 2005 and December 7, 2005, that may
require us to repurchase 11,500,000 shares of our common stock upon exercise. The written put
options, with a fair value of $41 million at June 26, 2005, were included in other current
liabilities. If the fair value of our common stock at June 26, 2005 decreased by 10%, the amount
required to physically settle the contracts would exceed the fair value of the shares repurchased
by approximately $41 million, net of the $29 million in premiums received.
44
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our
principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report.
45
(Unaudited)
Table of Contents
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
June 26,
June 27,
June 26,
June 27,
2005
2004
2005
2004
$
882
$
888
$
2,708
$
2,560
476
453
1,404
1,203
1,358
1,341
4,112
3,763
389
369
1,204
1,074
259
194
740
513
150
156
452
409
798
719
2,396
1,996
560
622
1,716
1,767
126
46
307
114
686
668
2,023
1,881
(126
)
(182
)
(418
)
(543
)
560
486
1,605
1,338
(10
)
(1
)
(11
)
$
560
$
486
$
1,605
$
1,327
$
0.34
$
0.30
$
0.98
$
0.83
(0.01
)
$
0.34
$
0.30
$
0.98
$
0.82
$
0.33
$
0.29
$
0.95
$
0.80
$
0.33
$
0.29
$
0.95
$
0.80
1,633
1,622
1,640
1,612
1,683
1,682
1,697
1,669
$
0.09
$
$
0.23
$
0.12
Table of Contents
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
June 26,
June 27,
2005
2004
$
1,605
$
1,338
144
120
(166
)
(32
)
9
(7
)
24
55
319
496
10
28
(50
)
(432
)
(33
)
(6
)
(45
)
52
(25
)
106
(44
)
58
(7
)
(64
)
1,741
1,712
(438
)
(194
)
(6,396
)
(5,774
)
6,477
4,100
(205
)
194
1
195
(14
)
(35
)
38
(189
)
(66
)
29
7
(530
)
(1,740
)
236
201
29
5
(953
)
(377
)
(194
)
(1,065
)
12
(20
)
146
(36
)
1,214
2,045
$
1,360
$
2,009
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
June 26,
June 27,
June 26,
June 27,
2005
2004
2005
2004
$
560
$
486
$
1,605
$
1,327
(6
)
(6
)
7
7
36
(14
)
94
13
8
12
46
1
4
1
(44
)
(10
)
(94
)
(20
)
(5
)
(30
)
23
47
$
555
$
456
$
1,628
$
1,374
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
June 26,
September 26,
2005
2004
$
(20
)
$
(27
)
58
42
$
38
$
15
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
June 26,
June 27,
June 26,
June 27,
2005
2004
2005
2004
$
560
$
486
$
1,605
$
1,327
1
(70
)
(70
)
(219
)
(206
)
$
490
$
416
$
1,387
$
1,121
$
0.34
$
0.30
$
0.98
$
0.82
$
0.30
$
0.26
$
0.85
$
0.70
$
0.33
$
0.29
$
0.95
$
0.80
$
0.29
$
0.25
$
0.82
$
0.67
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Current
Noncurrent
June 26,
September 26,
June 26,
September 26,
2005
2004
2005
2004
$
41
$
10
$
30
$
70
40
30
60
81
10
60
130
936
809
10
17
8
2,485
2,603
7
3
774
1,226
24
692
571
389
296
30
112
999
653
4,276
4,758
2,087
1,523
$
4,357
$
4,768
$
2,147
$
1,653
June 26,
September 26,
2005
2004
(in millions)
$
608
$
529
9
14
17
38
$
634
$
581
June 26,
September 26,
2005
2004
(in millions)
$
27
$
20
5
3
155
131
$
187
$
154
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
June 26,
September 26,
2005
2004
(in millions)
$
65
$
47
542
413
504
430
505
413
31
24
84
54
1,731
1,381
(826
)
(706
)
$
905
$
675
June 26, 2005
September 26, 2004
Gross Carrying
Accumulated
Gross Carrying
Accumulated
Amount
Amortization
Amount
Amortization
$
160
$
(15
)
$
77
$
(11
)
21
(9
)
21
(8
)
109
(45
)
77
(37
)
15
(13
)
15
(12
)
7
(1
)
7
(1
)
$
312
$
(83
)
$
197
$
(69
)
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
June 26,
June 27,
June 26,
June 27,
2005
2004
2005
2004
$
70
$
40
$
184
$
132
(2
)
(3
)
(1
)
74
17
157
32
9
(1
)
(7
)
(1
)
(8
)
7
(9
)
7
(7
)
(18
)
(24
)
(55
)
$
126
$
46
$
307
$
114
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
$
9,664
1,605
23
236
(953
)
234
(377
)
19
(4
)
$
10,447
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
2005
2004
Per Share
Total
Per Share
Total
$
0.07
$
115
$
0.07
(1)
$
112
0.07
115
0.05
81
0.09
147
$
0.23
$
377
$
0.12
$
193
(1)
In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company announced two dividends of $0.035 per
share which were paid in the first and second quarters of fiscal 2004.
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
QUALCOMM CDMA Technologies (QCT) develops and supplies CDMA and WCDMA-based
integrated circuits and system software for wireless voice and data communications,
multimedia functions and global positioning system products;
QUALCOMM Technology Licensing (QTL) grants licenses to use portions of the
Companys intellectual property portfolio, which includes certain patent rights
essential to and/or useful in the manufacture and sale of CDMA (including, without limitation, all versions of cdmaOne,
CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA, WCDMA and their derivatives) products, and collects
license fees and royalties in partial consideration for such licenses;
QUALCOMM Wireless & Internet (QWI) comprised of:
°
QUALCOMM Internet Services (QIS) provides technology to support
and accelerate the convergence of the wireless data market, including its BREW
product and services, QChat and QPoint;
°
QUALCOMM Government Technologies (QGOV) formerly QUALCOMM
Digital Media, provides development, hardware and analytical expertise to United
States government agencies involving wireless communications technologies; and
°
QUALCOMM Wireless Business Solutions (QWBS) provides satellite
and terrestrial-based two-way data messaging, position reporting and wireless
application services to transportation companies, private fleets, construction
equipment fleets and other enterprise companies.
QUALCOMM Strategic Initiatives (QSI) manages the Companys strategic investment
activities, including MediaFLO USA, Inc. (MediaFLO USA), the Companys wholly-owned
wireless multimedia operator subsidiary. QSI makes strategic investments to promote the
worldwide adoption of CDMA products and services.
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Reconciling
QCT*
QTL
QWI*
QSI*
Items*
Total
$
766
$
448
$
164
$
$
(20
)
$
1,358
186
407
12
30
51
686
$
794
$
436
$
143
$
$
(32
)
$
1,341
255
398
1
(12
)
26
668
$
2,378
$
1,342
$
473
$
$
(81
)
$
4,112
586
1,212
37
37
151
2,023
$
2,261
$
1,180
$
417
$
$
(95
)
$
3,763
776
1,084
7
(42
)
56
1,881
*As adjusted
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
June 26,
June 27,
June 26,
June 27,
2005
2004*
2005
2004*
$
(35
)
$
(39
)
$
(107
)
$
(111
)
15
7
26
16
$
(20
)
$
(32
)
$
(81
)
$
(95
)
$
(9
)
$
(13
)
$
(29
)
$
(39
)
(3
)
(8
)
3
(31
)
(13
)
(3
)
(40
)
(7
)
81
51
222
138
(5
)
(1
)
(5
)
(5
)
$
51
$
26
$
151
$
56
*As adjusted
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
QCT*
QTL
QWI*
$
762
$
419
$
162
4
29
2
$
793
$
403
$
138
1
33
5
$
2,372
$
1,248
$
466
6
94
7
$
2,259
$
1,085
$
403
2
95
14
*
As adjusted
June 26,
September 26,
2005
2004
$
488
$
565
151
8
140
117
438
400
10,361
9,730
$
11,578
$
10,820
*
As adjusted
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Iridigm
Trigenix
Spike
Total
$
24
$
$
3
$
27
26
3
29
129
34
6
169
16
5
9
30
195
42
18
255
(13
)
(7
)
(3
)
(23
)
6
6
$
188
$
35
$
15
$
238
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Table of Contents
CDMA based 3G subscribers to wireless operators services grew to at least 187
million worldwide through June 2005, including at least 15 million 1xEV-DO subscribers
and approximately 29 million WCDMA subscribers, according to inputs from a large portion
of the wireless operators around the world.
CDMA and WCDMA handset shipments by manufacturers to wireless operators totaled
approximately 43 million units at an average selling price of $231 as reported in the
third quarter of fiscal 2005 for licensee sales during the second quarter of fiscal
2005. WCDMA royalties for all products contributed approximately 36% of our total
royalty revenues.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we shipped approximately 36 million Mobile
Station Modems (MSM) integrated circuits for mobile CDMA phones and data modules, nearly
all of which were 3G, including CDMA2000 1X, 1xEV-DO and WCDMA.
As of July 2005, 45 wireless operators were offering BREW services in 24 countries.
BREW publishers and developers have earned more than $350 million to date from the sale
of wireless applications and services developed for the BREW solution. Through July,
three operators, including ALLTEL, have entered into agreements to license
our UiOne
user interface technology.
Table of Contents
Operators on the CDMA2000 technology path are deploying 1xEV-DO and are preparing to
deploy EV-DO Revision A. GSM operators are migrating their networks to WCDMA and are
preparing to deploy HSDPA (High Speed Downlink Packet Access). The deployment of these
3G networks enables higher voice capacity and supports data intensive applications like
multimedia.
As of July 2005, 78 WCDMA networks have launched, as reported by the Global Mobile
Suppliers Association, an international organization of WCDMA and GSM (Global System for
Mobile Communications) suppliers.
We expect volume increases and growing competition among WCDMA phone manufacturers
will help decrease average WCDMA phone prices significantly and drive growth of WCDMA
phone sales worldwide.
Table of Contents
We expect growing demand for phones and devices with greater multimedia capabilities
will continue to drive the need for increased MSM functionality and
integration, and we
intend to continue to invest significant resources in developing integrated circuit
products.
We expect growing demand for low end phones and have invested resources for single
chip solutions which combine the baseband, radio frequency and power management chips
into one package. Lower component counts and further integration drive costs down and
enable faster time to market to meet the increasing demand for low end phones. While we
are moving aggressively to address the low end market more effectively with CDMA, we
still face significant competition with GSM in this market.
We will also continue our development efforts with respect to our BREW applications
development platform and our new MediaFLO multi-media distribution system and FLO
technology for delivery of low cost multimedia content to multiple subscribers.
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended
June 26,
June 27,
2005
2004
Change
$
68
$
38
$
30
2
2
(2
)
(2
)
28
10
18
46
7
39
(1
)
(1
)
(8
)
7
(15
)
(7
)
(18
)
11
$
126
$
46
$
80
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Nine Months Ended
June 26,
June 27,
2005
2004
Change
$
181
$
118
$
63
3
14
(11
)
(3
)
(1
)
(2
)
68
21
47
98
11
87
(7
)
(1
)
(6
)
(9
)
7
(16
)
(24
)
(55
)
31
$
307
$
114
$
193
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Payments Due By Period
No
Remainder of
Fiscal 2006-
Fiscal 2008-
Beyond
Expiration
Total
Fiscal 2005
2007
2009
Fiscal 2009
Date
$
118
$
$
$
$
$
118
653
343
275
35
143
14
79
32
18
14
14
27
27
1
1
956
358
354
67
45
132
45
38
7
$
1,001
$
358
$
392
$
74
$
45
$
132
(1)
These commitments do not have fixed funding dates. Amounts are presented based on the
expiration of the commitment, but actual funding may occur earlier or not at all as funding
is subject to certain conditions. Commitments represent the maximum amounts to be financed
or funded under these arrangements; actual financing or funding may be in lesser amounts.
(2)
Certain long-term liabilities reflected on our balance sheet, such as unearned revenue,
are not presented in this table because they do not require cash settlement in the future.
Table of Contents
the product requirements of these customers;
the financial and operational success of these customers;
the success of these customers products that incorporate our products;
value added features which drive replacement rates;
shortages of key products and components;
Table of Contents
fluctuations in channel inventory levels;
the success of products sold to our customers by licensed competitors;
the rate of deployment of new technology by the network operators and the rate of
adoption of new technology by the end consumers;
the extent to which certain customers successfully develop and produce CDMA-based
integrated circuits and system software to meet their own needs;
general economic conditions;
changes in governmental regulations in countries where we or our customers currently
operate or plan to operate; and
widespread illness.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
changes in legal or regulatory requirements, including regulations governing the
materials used in our products;
difficulty in protecting or enforcing our intellectual property rights and/or
contracts in a particular foreign jurisdiction;
our inability to succeed in significant foreign markets, such as China, India or Europe;
cultural differences in the conduct of business;
difficulty in attracting qualified personnel and managing foreign activities;
recessions in economies outside the United States;
longer payment cycles for and greater difficulties collecting accounts receivable;
export controls, tariffs and other trade protection measures;
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
inflation and deflation;
nationalization, expropriation and limitations on repatriation of cash;
social, economic and political instability;
natural disasters, acts of terrorism, widespread illness and war;
taxation; and
changes in laws and policies affecting trade, foreign investments, licensing practices and loans.
Table of Contents
Assets or liabilities of our consolidated subsidiaries and our foreign investees that
are not denominated in the functional currency of those entities are subject to the
effects of currency fluctuations, which may affect our reported earnings. Our exposure
to foreign currencies may increase as we expand into new markets.
Investments in our consolidated foreign subsidiaries and in other foreign entities
that use the local currency as the functional currency may decline in value as a result
of declines in local currency values.
Certain of our revenues, such as royalty revenues, are derived from licensee or
customer sales that are denominated in foreign currencies. If these revenues are not
subject to foreign exchange hedging transactions, weakening of currency values in
selected regions could adversely affect our anticipated revenues and cash flows.
Foreign exchange hedging transactions could affect our cash flows and earnings
because they may require the payment of structuring fees, and they may limit the U.S.
dollar value of royalties from licensees sales that are denominated in foreign
currencies.
Our trade receivables are generally U.S. dollar denominated. Any significant increase
in the value of the dollar against our customers or licensees functional currencies
could result in an increase in our customers or licensees cash flow requirements and
could consequently affect our ability to collect receivables.
Strengthening of currency values in selected regions may adversely affect our
operating results because the activities of our foreign subsidiaries may become more
expensive in U.S. dollars.
Strengthening of currency values in selected regions may adversely affect our cash
flows and investment results because strategic investment obligations denominated in
foreign currencies may become more expensive, and the U.S. dollar cost of equity in
losses of foreign investees may increase.
Table of Contents
comprehensiveness of products and technologies;
value added features which drive replacement rates;
manufacturing capability;
scalability and the ability of the system technology to meet customers immediate and
future network requirements;
product performance and quality;
Table of Contents
design and engineering capabilities;
compliance with industry standards;
time to market;
system cost; and
customer support.
longer operating histories and presence in key markets;
greater name recognition;
motivation by our customers in certain circumstances to find alternate suppliers;
access to larger customer bases; and
greater sales and marketing, manufacturing, distribution, technical and other resources than we have.
Table of Contents
announcements concerning us or our competitors, including the selection of wireless
communications technology by wireless operators and the timing of the roll-out of those
systems;
receipt of substantial orders or order cancellations for integrated circuits and
system software products;
quality deficiencies in services or products;
announcements regarding financial developments or technological innovations;
international developments, such as technology mandates, political developments or
changes in economic policies;
lack of capital to invest in 3G networks;
new commercial products;
changes in recommendations of securities analysts;
government regulations, including stock option accounting and tax regulations;
energy blackouts;
acts of terrorism and war;
inflation and deflation;
widespread illness;
proprietary rights or product or patent litigation;
strategic transactions, such as acquisitions and divestitures; or
rumors or allegations regarding our financial disclosures or practices.
Table of Contents
rapid technological advances and evolving industry standards;
changes in customer requirements;
frequent introductions of new products and enhancements; and
evolving methods of building and operating telecommunications systems.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Principal Amount of Fixed Income Securities by Expected Maturity
Average Interest Rates
(Dollars in millions)
Remainder
No Single
Fair
June 26, 2005:
of 2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Thereafter
Maturity
Total
Value
$
256
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
256
$
256
3.2
%
$
10
$
131
$
$
$
$
$
$
141
$
140
1.5
%
1.7
%
$
905
$
1,450
$
688
$
319
$
31
$
65
$
771
$
4,229
$
4,229
2.8
%
3.1
%
3.3
%
3.7
%
3.3
%
3.9
%
3.2
%
$
$
1
$
12
$
25
$
54
$
624
$
$
716
$
716
6.9
%
6.0
%
7.3
%
7.4
%
8.0
%
No Single
Fair
September 26, 2004:
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Thereafter
Maturity
Total
Value
$
458
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
458
$
457
1.5
%
$
10
$
130
$
$
$
$
$
$
140
$
140
1.5
%
1.7
%
$
1,636
$
803
$
806
$
59
$
63
$
39
$
1,243
$
4,649
$
4,649
1.8
%
2.2
%
2.3
%
2.7
%
2.1
%
2.9
%
2.3
%
$
1
$
3
$
5
$
20
$
61
$
481
$
$
571
$
571
1.1
%
7.0
%
8.9
%
9.7
%
8.7
%
8.5
%
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
A review of the Companys current litigation is disclosed in the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements. See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Note
7 Commitments and Contingencies. We are also engaged in other legal actions arising in the
ordinary course of our business and believe that the ultimate outcome of these actions will not
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial position.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (in millions except share and per share data):
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
46
47
Total Number of
Approximate Dollar Value
Shares Purchased as
of Shares that
Part of Publicly
May Yet Be
Total Number of
Average Price Paid
Announced Plans or
Purchased Under the
Shares Purchased
Per Share
(1)
Programs
(2)
Plans or Programs
(3)
10,295,000
$
33.84
10,295,000
$
1,313
2,457,516
$
34.79
2,457,516
$
1,227
5,145,364
$
34.92
5,145,364
$
1,048
17,897,880
$
34.28
17,897,880
$
1,048
(1)
Average Price Paid Per Share excludes cash paid for commissions.
(2)
On March 8, 2005, the Company announced that it had authorized the expenditure of up to $2 billion to repurchase shares of the
Companys stock. This program does not have an expiration date.
(3)
The Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased has not been reduced by the net cost of $389 million (net of the
premiums received) of 11,500,000 shares that may be repurchased related to put options the Company sold during the nine months ended
June 26, 2005.
Exhibits
Share Purchase Agreement dated as of September 25, 2003, by and among Vésper Holding, Ltd.,
QUALCOMM do Brasil Ltda. and Embratel Particpações S.A.(1)
Restated Certificate of Incorporation.(2)
Amended and Restated Bylaws.(2)
Offer Letter Agreement dated January 17, 2005.(3)(4)
Summary of Changes to Non-Employee Director Compensation Program.(3)(5)
Copy of Sulpizio Stock Option Agreement dated March 8, 2005 (18,000 Options).(2)(3)
Copy of Sulpizio Stock Option Agreement dated March 8, 2005 (157,000 Options). (2)(3)
Form of Amended 2001 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan. (6)(3)
Description of 2005 Named Executive Officer Salaries.(3)(7)
Table of Contents
Exhibits
Copy of Cruickshank Stock Option Agreement dated June 3, 2005 (40,000 options). (8)(3)
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Paul E. Jacobs.
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for William E. Keitel.
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Paul E. Jacobs.
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for William E. Keitel.
(1)
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 28, 2003.
(2)
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2005.
(3)
Indicates management or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be identified pursuant
to Item 14(c).
(4)
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 19, 2005.
(5)
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 25,
2005.
(6)
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 6, 2005.
(7)
Filed under the heading 2005 Named Executive Officer Salaries in Item 1.01 of the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2005.
(8)
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 8, 2005.
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: July 20, 2005
QUALCOMM Incorporated
/s/ William E. Keitel
William E. Keitel
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Paul E. Jacobs, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of QUALCOMM Incorporated;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: July 20, 2005 /s/ Paul E. Jacobs ------------------------- Paul E. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, William E. Keitel, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of QUALCOMM Incorporated;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: July 20, 2005 /s/ William E. Keitel --------------------------------------- William E. Keitel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of QUALCOMM Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 26, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Paul E. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: July 20, 2005 /s/ Paul E. Jacobs -------------------------------- Paul E. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of QUALCOMM
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 26,
2005 (the "Report"), I, William E. Keitel, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: July 20, 2005 /s/ William E. Keitel ------------------------------- William E. Keitel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |