Quarterly Report


Table of Contents

 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
 ____________________________________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
 ____________________________________________________________________________
(Mark One)
x
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
or
o
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For the transition period from ______  to  ______
Commission File Number 0-23441
 ____________________________________________________________________________
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 ____________________________________________________________________________
DELAWARE
 
94-3065014
(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
5245 Hellyer Avenue, San Jose, California, 95138
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(408) 414-9200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 ____________________________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES   x     NO  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES   x    NO   o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer   x
 
Accelerated filer   o
Non-accelerated filer     o  
(Do not check if  a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company   o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES   o     NO   x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
Shares Outstanding at October 21, 2011
Common Stock, $.001 par value
28,052,418
 
 
 
 
 

Table of Contents

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
Item 1A.
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 6.
 
 
 
 

2

Table of Contents

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes a number of forward-looking statements that involve many risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are identified by the use of the words “would”, “could”, “will”, “may”, “expect”, “believe”, “should”, “anticipate”, “outlook”, “if”, “future”, “intend”, “plan”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “targets”, “seek” or “continue” and similar words and phrases, including the negatives of these terms, or other variations of these terms, that denote future events. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and our potential financial performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results and financial position to differ materially and adversely from what is projected or implied in any forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q. These factors include, but are not limited to, the risks described under Item 1A of Part II — “Risk Factors,” Item 2 of Part I — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including: our ability to maintain and establish strategic relationships; the risks inherent in the development and delivery of complex technologies; our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel; the emergence of new markets for our products and services; our ability to compete in those markets based on timeliness, cost and market demand; and our ability to procure on reasonable terms an adequate and timely supply of our products from third party manufacturers. We make these forward-looking statements based upon information available on the date of this Form 10-Q, and we have no obligation (and expressly disclaim any such obligation) to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or otherwise except as otherwise required by securities regulations.

3

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
(In thousands)
 
 
September 30,
 
December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
ASSETS
 
 
 
CURRENT ASSETS:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
148,578

 
$
155,667

Short-term investments
48,932

 
27,355

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $202 and $275 in 2011 and 2010, respectively (Note 2)
10,330

 
5,713

Inventories
51,763

 
62,077

Deferred tax assets
1,440

 
1,435

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
6,864

 
9,263

Total current assets
267,907

 
261,510

INVESTMENTS
25,022

 
31,760

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net
85,271

 
84,470

INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net
9,066

 
9,795

GOODWILL
14,786

 
14,826

DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
12,637

 
13,421

OTHER ASSETS
25,799

 
17,288

Total assets
$
440,488

 
$
433,070

 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
17,318

 
$
20,291

Accrued payroll and related expenses
6,290

 
7,395

Taxes payable
1,759

 

Deferred income on sales to distributors
10,316

 
12,221

Other accrued liabilities
2,613

 
9,548

Total current liabilities
38,296

 
49,455

LONG-TERM INCOME TAXES PAYABLE
33,805

 
29,580

Total liabilities
72,101

 
79,035

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 9, 11 and 12)

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
 
 
 
Common stock
28

 
28

Additional paid-in capital
166,007

 
175,295

Accumulated other comprehensive income
80

 
85

Retained earnings
202,272

 
178,627

Total stockholders’ equity
368,387

 
354,035

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
440,488

 
$
433,070

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
NET REVENUES
$
75,063

 
$
75,452

 
$
232,009

 
$
226,817

COST OF REVENUES
40,020

 
36,447

 
122,917

 
110,402

GROSS PROFIT
35,043

 
39,005

 
109,092

 
116,415

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

Research and development
10,345

 
9,348

 
30,563

 
26,133

Sales and marketing
7,990

 
7,657

 
24,342

 
22,104

General and administrative
6,145

 
6,746

 
18,761

 
19,223

Total operating expenses
24,480

 
23,751

 
73,666

 
67,460

INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
10,563

 
15,254

 
35,426

 
48,955

OTHER INCOME
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income, net
552

 
415

 
1,455

 
1,379

Total other income
552

 
415

 
1,455

 
1,379

INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
11,115

 
15,669

 
36,881

 
50,334

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
3,603

 
3,035

 
8,916

 
9,800

NET INCOME
$
7,512

 
$
12,634

 
$
27,965

 
$
40,534

 

 

 

 

EARNINGS PER SHARE:

 

 

 

Basic
$
0.26

 
$
0.45

 
$
0.97

 
$
1.46

Diluted
$
0.25

 
$
0.43

 
$
0.93

 
$
1.38

 

 

 

 

SHARES USED IN PER SHARE CALCULATION:

 

 

 

Basic
28,799

 
27,894

 
28,789

 
27,737

Diluted
29,879

 
29,283

 
30,195

 
29,406

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


5

Table of Contents

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(In thousands)
 
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Net income
$
27,965

 
$
40,534

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation
11,337

 
8,974

Amortization of intangibles
729

 
504

Gain on sale of property and equipment
(41
)
 
(344
)
Stock-based compensation expense
6,617

 
7,459

Amortization of premium on held to maturity investments
1,255

 
1,337

Deferred income taxes
779

 
249

Decrease in accounts receivable allowances
(74
)
 
(25
)
Excess tax benefit from stock options exercised
(729
)
 
(939
)
Tax benefit associated with employee stock plans
1,826

 
1,951

Change in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
(4,542
)
 
13,854

Inventories
10,184

 
(22,796
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
2,823

 
4,610

Accounts payable
(1,090
)
 
93

Taxes payable and accrued liabilities
4,891

 
4,305

Deferred income on sales to distributors
(1,904
)
 
5,808

Net cash provided by operating activities
60,026

 
65,574

 
 
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Purchases of property and equipment
(16,229
)
 
(21,833
)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
2,249

 
1,415

Other assets
(1,271
)
 

Acquisition (Note 14)
(6,914
)
 
(8,598
)
Increase in financing lease receivables
(7,978
)
 

Collections of financing lease receivable
314

 

Note to third party
(3,000
)
 
(6,750
)
Collection of note to third party
3,000

 

Purchases of held-to-maturity investments
(31,269
)
 
(27,224
)
Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity investments
15,175

 
26,491

Net cash used in investing activities
(45,923
)
 
(36,499
)
 
 
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Issuance of common stock under employee stock plans
18,218

 
17,987

Repurchase of common stock
(35,819
)
 
(13,960
)
Retirement of shares for income tax withholding

 
(769
)
Payments of dividends to stockholders
(4,320
)
 
(4,163
)
Excess tax benefit from stock options exercised
729

 
939

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(21,192
)
 
34

 
 
 
 
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(7,089
)
 
29,109

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
155,667

 
134,974

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
$
148,578

 
$
164,083

 
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Unpaid property and equipment
$
3,486

 
$
1,008

Conversion of notes receivable in connection with acquisition (Note 14)
$

 
$
1,752

Application of prepayment to acquisition (Note 14)
$

 
$
1,200

 
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
 
 
 
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds
$
553

 
$
1,951


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents


POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Power Integrations, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
    
While the financial information furnished is unaudited, the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that the Company considers necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods covered and the financial condition of the Company at the date of the interim balance sheet in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Power Integrations, Inc. consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in its Form 10-K/A filed on June 15, 2011 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

No significant changes have been made to the Company's significant accounting policies disclosed in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , in its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, filed on June 15, 2011, for the year ended December 31, 2010. The accounting policy information below is to aid in the understanding of the financial information disclosed.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers cash invested in highly liquid financial instruments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Short-Term and Long-Term Investments

Investments in highly liquid financial instruments with maturities greater than three months but not longer than twelve months from the balance sheet date are classified as short-term investments. Investments in financial instruments with maturities greater than twelve months from the balance sheet date are classified as long-term investments. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 , the Company's short-term and long-term investments consisted of U.S. government backed securities, municipal bonds, corporate commercial paper, certificates of deposit and other high-quality commercial securities, which were classified as held-to-maturity and were valued using the amortized-cost method, which approximates fair market value.

Amortized cost and estimated fair market value of investments classified as held-to-maturity at September 30, 2011 , are as follows (in thousands):

7

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 
 
 
Gross Unrealized
 
 
 
Amortized Cost
 
Gains
Losses
 
Estimated Fair Market Value
Investments due in less than 3 months:
 
 
 
 
 
 
       Commercial paper
$
7,000

 
$

$

 
$
7,000

       Corporate securities
11,602

 
4

(1
)
 
11,605

       Total
$
18,602

 
$
4

$
(1
)
 
$
18,605

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments due in 4-12 months:
 
 
 
 
 
 
       Corporate securities
$
27,330

 
$
241

(30
)
 
$
27,541

       Certificates of deposit
10,000

 
8


 
10,008

       Total
$
37,330

 
$
249

(30
)
 
$
37,549

Investments due in more than 12 months:
 
 
 
 
 
 
       Corporate securities
$
25,022

 
$
25

$
(141
)
 
$
24,906

       Total
$
25,022

 
$
25

$
(141
)
 
$
24,906

Total investment securities
$
80,954

 
$
278

$
(172
)
 
$
81,060


Amortized cost and estimated fair market value of investments classified as held-to-maturity at December 31, 2010  are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
 
Gross Unrealized
 
 
 
Amortized Cost
 
Gains
Losses
 
Estimated Fair Market Value
Investments due in less than 3 months:
 
 
 
 
 
 
       Commercial paper
$
7,135

 
$

$

 
$
7,135

       Corporate securities
1,508

 

(1
)
 
1,507

       Total
$
8,643

 
$

$
(1
)
 
$
8,642

 

 


 
 
Investments due in 4-12 months:

 


 
 
       Corporate securities
$
21,255

 
$
84

$

 
$
21,339

       U.S. government securities
5,095

 
20


 
5,115

       U.S. municipal securities
1,005

 
3


 
1,008

       Total
$
27,355

 
$
107

$

 
$
27,462

 

 


 
 
Investments due in more than 12 months:

 


 
 
       Corporate securities
$
31,760

 
$
648

$

 
$
32,408

       Total
$
31,760

 
$
648

$

 
$
32,408

 

 


 
 
Total investment securities
$
67,758

 
$
755

$
(1
)
 
$
68,512

Revenue Recognition

Product revenues consist of sales to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), merchant power supply manufacturers and distributors. Shipping terms to international OEM customers and merchant power supply manufacturers from the Company's facility in California are “delivered at frontier” (“DAF”). As such, title to the product passes to the customer when the shipment reaches the destination country and revenue is recognized upon the arrival of the product in that country. Shipping terms to international OEMs and merchant power supply manufacturers on shipments from the Company's facility outside of the United States are “EX Works” ("EXW"), meaning that title to the product transfers to the customer upon shipment from the Company's foreign warehouse. Shipments to OEMs and merchant power supply manufacturers in the Americas are “free on board” (“FOB”) point of origin meaning that title is passed to the customer upon shipment. Revenue is recognized upon title transfer for sales to OEMs and merchant power supply manufacturers, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition are met as described below.


8

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The Company applies the provisions of Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 605-10 (“ASC 605-10”) and all related appropriate guidance. Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria have been met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred, (3) the price is fixed or determinable, and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Delivery is considered to have occurred when title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer. The Company considers the price to be fixed based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. With respect to trade receivables, the Company performs ongoing evaluations of its customers' financial conditions and requires letters of credit whenever deemed necessary.
 
The Company makes sales to distributors and retail partners and recognizes revenue based on a sell-through method. Sales to distributors are made under terms allowing certain price protection and rights of return on the Company's products held by the distributors. As a result of these rights, the Company defers the recognition of revenue and the costs of revenues derived from sales to distributors until such distributors resell the Company's products to their custom ers. The Company determines the amounts to defer based on the level of actual inventory on hand at the distributors as well as inventory in transit to the distributors. The gross profit that is deferred as a result of this policy is reflected as “deferred income on sales to distributors” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The total deferred revenue as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately $22.1 million and $24.7 million , respectively. The total deferred cost as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately $11.8 million and $12.5 million , respectively.

Common Stock Repurchases and Common Stock Dividend

In May 2009, the Company's board of directors authorized the use of $25.0 million to repurchase the Company's common stock. From May 2009 to December 31, 2009 the Company purchased 0.5 million shares for approximately $11.0 million , and in the first two quarters of 2010 the Company purchased 0.4 million shares for approximately $14.0 million , concluding this repurchase program.

In February 2011, the board of directors authorized the use of an additional $50.0 million for the repurchase of the Company's common stock, with repurchases to be executed according to certain pre-defined price/volume guidelines set by the board of directors. In the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company repurchased 1.1 million shares for a total cost of $35.8 million , leaving $14.2 million remaining for future repurchases. There is currently no expiration date for this stock repurchase program.

In January 2010, the Company's board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.05 per share to be paid to stockholders of record at the end of each quarter in 2010. The quarterly dividend payments were made on March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010, September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010, to stockholders of record as of February 26, 2010, May 28, 2010, August 31, 2010 and November 30, 2010, respectively, each in the aggregate amount of approximately $1.4 million .

In October 2010, the Company's board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.05 per share to be paid to stockholders of record at the end of each quarter in 2011. The first quarterly dividend payment of approximately $1.4 million was made on March 31, 2011, to stockholders of record as of February 28, 2011, the second quarterly dividend payment of $1.4 million was made on June 30, 2011 to stockholders of record as of May 31, 2011 and the third payment of $1.4 million was made on September 30, 2011 to stockholders of record as of August 31, 2011. The Company expects that the remaining quarterly dividend will result in a similar use of cash. The declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, business conditions and other factors, as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interest of the Company's stockholders.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition and inventories. These estimates are based on historical facts and various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable at the time the estimates are made.
Comprehensive Income

9

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Comprehensive income consists of net income, plus the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments. The components of comprehensive income, net of taxes, are as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Net income
$
7,512

 
$
12,634

 
$
27,965

 
$
40,534

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

Translation adjustments
(78
)
 
105

 
(5
)
 
50

Total comprehensive income
$
7,434

 
$
12,739

 
$
27,960

 
$
40,584

 
Components of the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet    
Accounts Receivable (in thousands):
 
 
September 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
Accounts receivable trade
$
32,764

 
$
30,656

Accrued ship and debit and rebate claims
(22,232
)
 
(24,839
)
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(202
)
 
(275
)
Other

 
171

Total
$
10,330

 
$
5,713

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets (in thousands):
 
 
September 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
Prepaid legal fees
$
1,000

 
$
4,000

Prepaid inventory (Note 16)

 
917

Prepaid income tax
1,351

 
1,117

Prepaid maintenance agreements
786

 
554

Interest receivable
788

 
737

Other
2,939

 
1,938

Total
$
6,864

 
$
9,263


Other Assets (in thousands):

 
September 30, 2011
 
December 31, 2010
Prepaid royalty (Note 15)
$
10,000

 
$
10,000

Investment in third party (Note 15)
7,000

 
7,000

Financing lease receivables and deposits (Note 17)
7,215

 

Other
1,584

 
288

Total
$
25,799

 
$
17,288

Other Accrued Liabilities (in thousands):
 

10

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 
September 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
Accrued payment for acquisition (Note 14)
$

 
$
6,955

Accrued professional fees
1,354

 
1,013

Accrued expense for engineering wafers
529

 
502

Advances from customers
498

 
713

Other
232

 
365

Total
$
2,613

 
$
9,548


3. STOCK PLANS AND SHARE BASED COMPENSATION:

Stock Plans
As of September 30, 2011 , the Company had five stock-based compensation plans (the “Plans”) which are described below.

2007 Equity Incentive Plan

The 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2007 Plan") was adopted by the board of directors on September 10, 2007 and approved by the stockholders on November 7, 2007 as an amendment and restatement of the 1997 Stock Option Plan (the "1997 Plan").  The 2007 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards ("RSUs"), stock appreciation rights, performance stock awards and other stock awards to employees, directors and consultants.  As of September 30, 2011 , the maximum remaining number of shares that may be issued under the 2007 Plan was  6,825,949 shares, which consists of the shares remaining available for issuance under the 1997 Plan, including shares subject to outstanding options and stock awards under the 1997 Plan.  Pursuant to the 2007 Plan, the exercise price for incentive stock options and nonstatutory stock options is generally at least 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant.  Options generally vest over 48 months measured from the date of grant. Options generally expire no later than ten years after the date of grant, subject to earlier termination upon an optionee's cessation of employment or service.  

Beginning January 27, 2009, grants pursuant to the Directors Equity Compensation Program (that was adopted by the board of directors on January 27, 2009) to nonemployee directors have been made primarily under the 2007 Plan. The Directors Equity Compensation Program provides in certain circumstances (depending on the status of the particular director's holdings of Company stock options) for the automatic grant of nonstatutory stock options to nonemployee directors of the Company on the first trading day of July in each year over their period of service on the board of directors. Further, each future nonemployee director of the Company would be granted under the 2007 Plan: (a) on the first trading day of the month following commencement of service, an option to purchase the number of shares of common stock equal to: the fraction of a year between the date of the director's appointment to the board of directors and the next July 1, multiplied by 8,000 , which option shall vest on the next July 1 st ; and (b) on the first trading day of July following commencement of service, an option to purchase 24,000 shares vesting monthly over the three year period commencing on the grant date. The Directors Equity Compensation Program will remain in effect at the discretion of the board of directors or the compensation committee.

On July 28, 2009, the 2007 Plan was amended generally to prohibit outstanding options or stock appreciation rights from being cancelled in exchange for cash without stockholder approval.
1997 Stock Option Plan

In June 1997, the board of directors adopted the 1997 Stock Option Plan (the "1997 Plan"), whereby the board of directors could grant incentive stock options and nonstatutory stock options to purchase the Company's common stock to key employees, directors and consultants. The exercise price of incentive stock options could not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price of nonstatutory stock options may not be less than 85% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Effective November 2007, the board of directors determined that no further options would be granted under the 1997 Plan, and shares remaining available for issuance under the 1997 Plan, including shares subject to outstanding options under the 1997 Plan were transferred to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. All outstanding options would continue to be governed and remain outstanding in accordance with their

11

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

existing terms.

1997 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan

In September 1997, the board of directors adopted the 1997 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan (the ''Directors Plan''). A total of 800,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the Directors Plan. The exercise price per share of all options granted under the Directors Plan is equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant. Options granted under the Directors Plan have a maximum term of ten years after the date of grant, subject to earlier termination upon an optionee's cessation of service. The Directors Plan provides that each future nonemployee director of the Company will be granted an option to purchase 30,000 shares on which such individual first becomes a nonemployee director of the Company (the ''Initial Grant''). Thereafter, each nonemployee director who has served on the board of directors continuously for 12 months will be granted an additional option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock (an ''Annual Grant''). Approximately 1/3 rd of Initial Grants became exercisable one year after the date of grant and 1/36 th of the Initial Grant will become exercisable monthly thereafter. Each Annual Grant will become exercisable in twelve equal monthly installments beginning in the 25th month after the date of grant, subject to the optionee's continuous service. In the event of certain changes in control of the Company, all options outstanding under the Directors Plan will become immediately vested and exercisable in full. The board of directors suspended grants under the Directors Plan, and nonemployee directors have received, and will receive, initial and annual grants primarily under the Power Integrations 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (described above) pursuant to the “Directors Equity Compensation Program” (see description above). The suspension of grants under the Directors Plan is indefinite, and will last until the board of directors or compensation committee determines that grants under the Directors Plan will no longer be suspended.

On July 28, 2009, the Directors Plan was amended generally to prohibit outstanding options from being amended 1) to reduce the exercise price of such outstanding options or 2) canceled in exchanged for cash, other awards or options with a lower exercise price without stockholder approval.

1998 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan

In July 1998, the board of directors adopted the 1998 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”); whereby the board of directors may grant nonstatutory stock options to employees and consultants, but only to the extent that such options do not require approval of the Company's stockholders. The 1998 Plan has not been approved by the Company's stockholders. The exercise price of nonstatutory stock options may not be less than 85% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. As of September 30, 2011 , the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 1998 Plan was 1.0 million and as of that date no shares are available for future issuance. In general, options vest over 48 months. Options generally have a maximum term of ten years after the date of grant, subject to earlier termination upon an optionee's cessation of employment or service.

On July 28, 2009, the 1998 Plan was amended generally to prohibit outstanding options from being amended 1) to reduce the exercise price of such outstanding options or 2) canceled in exchanged for cash, other awards or options with a lower exercise price without stockholder approval.

1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Under the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”), eligible employees may apply accumulated payroll deductions, which may not exceed 15% of an employee's compensation, to the purchase of shares of the Company's common stock at periodic intervals. The purchase price of stock under the Purchase Plan is equal to 85% of the lower of (i) the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the first day of each offering period, or (ii) the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the purchase date (as defined in the Purchase Plan). Each offering period consists of one purchase period of approximately six months duration. An aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance to employees under the Purchase Plan. As of September 30, 2011 , 2,345,615 shares had been purchased and 654,385 shares were reserved for future issuance under the Purchase Plan.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company applies the provisions of ASC 718-10. Under the provisions of ASC 718-10, the Company recognizes the fair value of stock-based compensation in financial statements over the requisite service period of the individual grants,

12

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

which generally equals a four-year vesting period. The Company uses estimates of volatility, expected term, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield and forfeitures in determining the fair value of these awards and the amount of compensation expense to recognize. The Company uses the straight-line method to amortize all stock awards granted over the requisite service period of the award.
 
Determining Fair Value of Stock Options

The Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation model for valuing stock option grants using the following assumptions and estimates:

Expected Volatility . The Company calculates expected volatility as an average of implied volatility and historical volatility.

Expected Term . The Company utilizes a model which uses historical exercise, cancellation and outstanding option data to calculate the expected term of stock option grants.

Risk-Free Interest Rate . The Company bases the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes valuation model on the implied yield available on a U.S. Treasury note with a term approximately equal to the expected term of the underlying grants.

Dividend Yield.   The dividend yield was calculated by dividing the annual dividend by the average closing price of the Company's common stock on a quarterly basis.

Estimated Forfeitures. The Company uses historical data to estimate pre-vesting forfeitures, and records share-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.

The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense recognized in accordance with ASC 718-10 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 (in thousands).

 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Cost of revenues
$
128

 
$
153

 
$
584

 
$
481

Research and development
564

 
1,125

 
2,354

 
2,782

Sales and marketing
449

 
727

 
1,659

 
1,776

General and administrative
527

 
930

 
2,020

 
2,438

Total stock-based compensation expense
$
1,668

 
$
2,935

 
$
6,617

 
$
7,477


As of September 30, 2011 there were approximately $6.7 million , net of expected forfeitures, of total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options. The unrecognized compensation expense at September 30, 2011 is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.

As of September 30, 2011 , the Company had $11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to restricted stock units. The unamortized compensation expense will be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average period of 3.2 years.

As of September 30, 2011 , the total unrecognized compensation cost under the Purchase Plan to purchase the Company's common stock was approximately $0.4 million . The Company will amortize this cost on a straight-line basis over approximately 0.5 years.

Stock compensation expense in the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $1.7 million (comprised of approximately $1.0 million related to stock options, a reduction of $0.7 million related to performance shares that are not expected to vest in 2011 (see the performance-based awards section below for details), $1.1 million related to restricted stock units and $0.3 million related to the Purchase Plan). Stock compensation expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $6.6 million (comprised of approximately $3.1 million related to stock options, $2.5 million related to restricted stock

13

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

units, $0.9 million related to the Purchase Plan and $0.1 million in compensation expense amortized from beginning inventory).

Stock compensation expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 , was $2.9 million (comprised of approximately $1.3 million related to stock options, $1.0 million related to performance shares, $0.5 million related to restricted stock units, $0.2 million related to the Purchase Plan, partially offset by $0.1 million in compensation expense capitalized into inventory) and $7.5 million (comprised of approximately $4.0 million related to stock options, $2.0 million related to performance shares, $0.8 million related to restricted stock units, $0.8 million related to the Purchase Plan, partially offset by $0.1 million in compensation expense capitalized into inventory), respectively.

The fair value of stock options granted is established on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk-free interest rates
1.46%
 
1.53%
 
1.46% - 2.20%
 
1.53% - 2.25%
Expected volatility rates
44%
 
45%
 
44%
 
45% - 48%
Expected dividend yield
0.59%
 
0.62%
 
0.54% - 0.59%
 
0.54% - 0.62%
Expected term of stock options (in years)
6.00
 
5.12
 
6.00
 
5.12
Weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted
$15.58
 
$12.61
 
$15.66
 
$14.82

The fair value of employees’ stock purchase rights under the Purchase Plan was estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Risk-free interest rates
0.16%
 
0.20%
 
0.16% - 0.17%
 
0.17% - 0.20%
Expected volatility rates
37%
 
43%
 
37%
 
36% - 43%
Expected dividend yield
0.59%
 
0.62%
 
0.51% - 0.59%
 
0.34% - 0.62%
Expected term of purchase right (years)
0.50
 
0.50
 
0.50
 
0.50
Weighted-average estimated fair value of purchase rights
$8.93
 
$9.49
 
$9.15
 
$8.65

A summary of stock option activity under the Plans, excluding performance-based shares and restricted stock units, as of September 30, 2011 , and changes during the nine months then ended, is presented below:
 
Shares
(in thousands)
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2011
4,433

 
$
22.68

 
 
 
 
Granted
164

 
37.37

 
 
 
 
Exercised
(734
)
 
19.63

 
 
 
 
Forfeited or expired
(63
)
 
25.02

 
 
 
 
Outstanding at September 30, 2011
3,800

 
$
23.87

 
4.83

 
$
27,924

Exercisable at September 30, 2011
3,119

 
$
22.90

 
4.08

 
$
24,599

Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2011
3,760

 
$
23.76

 
4.79

 
$
27,854


The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $1.8 million and $13.4 million , respectively, and the intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $1.1 million and $18.4 million , respectively.


14

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Performance-based Awards

Under the performance-based awards program, the Company grants awards in the first half of the performance year in an amount equal to twice the target number of shares to be issued if the target performance metrics are met. The number of shares that are released at the end of the performance year can range from zero to 200% of the targeted number depending on the Company's performance. The performance metrics of this program are annual targets consisting of net revenue and non-GAAP operating earnings. Each performance-based award granted from the 2007 Plan will reduce the number of shares available for issuance under the 2007 Plan by 2.0 shares.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 , the Company issued approximately 98,000 performance-based awards to employees and executives. As the net revenue and non-GAAP operating earnings are considered performance conditions, expenses associated with these awards, net of estimated forfeitures, are recorded throughout the year depending on the number of shares expected to be earned based on progress toward the performance targets. The cost of performance-based awards is determined using the fair value of the Company's common stock on the grant date, reduced by the discounted present value of dividends expected to be declared before the awards vest. If the performance conditions are not achieved, no compensation cost is recognized and any previously recognized compensation is reversed. The Company does not believe the net revenue and non-GAAP operating earnings performance targets will be met in 2011, and therefore reversed $0.7 million of previously recognized expense during the three months ended September 30, 2011.

In January 2011, it was determined that the Company had reached the maximum level of the established performance targets for the performance-based awards granted in 2010. Accordingly, the 85,000 performance-based awards, which were fully vested, were released to the Company's employees and executives in the first quarter of 2011 .

A summary of performance-based awards outstanding as of September 30, 2011 , and activity during the nine months then ended, is presented below:
 
 
Shares
(in thousands)
 
Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
 
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in thousands )
Outstanding at January 1, 2011
85

 
$
34.97

 
 
 
 
Granted
98

 
36.57

 
 
 
 
Vested
(85
)
 
34.97

 
 
 
 
Forfeited or expired
(6
)
 
36.61

 
 
 
 
Outstanding at September 30, 2011
92

 
$
36.57

 
0.25

 
$
2,817

Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2011

 
 
 
0.25

 
$


The weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of performance-based awards granted in the three months ended September 30, 2011 was approximately $30.58 , there were no performance-based awards granted in the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of performance-based awards granted in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $36.57 and $34.86 , respectively. The grant date fair value of awards released, which were fully vested, in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $3.0 million and $2.3 million , respectively. There were no performance-based awards released in either of the three months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 .

Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)

The Company grants restricted stock units to employees under the 2007 Plan. RSUs granted to employees typically vest ratably over a four-year period, and are converted into shares of the Company's common stock upon vesting on a one-for-one basis subject to the employee's continued service to the Company over that period. The cost of the RSUs is determined using the fair value of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant, reduced by the discounted present value of dividends expected to be declared before the awards vest. Compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of each grant adjusted for estimated forfeitures. Each RSU award granted from the 2007 plan will reduce the number of shares available for issuance under the 2007 Plan by 2.0 shares.
A summary of RSUs outstanding as of September 30, 2011 , and changes during the nine months then ended, is as

15

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

follows:
 
 
Shares
(in thousands)
 
Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
 
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2011
260

 
$
36.30

 
 
 
 
Granted
253

 
36.16

 
 
 
 
Vested
(58
)
 
36.30

 
 
 
 
Forfeited or expired
(25
)
 
37.28

 
 
 
 
Outstanding at September 30, 2011
430

 
$
36.16

 
1.89

 
$
13,154

Outstanding and expected to vest at September 30, 2011
379

 
 
 
1.87

 
$
11,591


The weighted-average grant-date fair value of RSUs awarded in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was approximately $33.21 and $36.16 , respectively. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of RSUs awarded in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $33.71 and $36.53 , respectively. The grant date fair value of awards vested in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was approximately $0.2 million and $2.1 million , respectively; and $17,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2010 . No RSUs vested in the first six months of 2010.

4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:
ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements , clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 820-10 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical assets in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions. This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.
The Company's cash and investment instruments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The type of instrument valued based on quoted market prices in active markets primarily includes money market securities. This type of instrument is generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The types of instruments valued based on other observable inputs (Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy) include investment-grade corporate bonds and government, state, municipal and provincial obligations. Such types of investments are valued by using a multi-dimensional relational model, the inputs, when available, are primarily benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data including market research publications. The Company's investments classified as Level 1 and Level 2 are held-to-maturity investments, and were valued using the amortized-cost method, which approximates fair market value.
On October 22, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with SemiSouth Laboratories, pursuant to which, among other things, the Company may be obligated to acquire SemiSouth if SemiSouth meets certain financial performance conditions on or before June 30, 2013. At September 30, 2011 , the Company determined the fair value of this potential obligation to be zero. The Company used Level 2 inputs in its fair market valuation using a market approach valuation technique and determined the fair value of this obligation to be zero. The Company derived the Level 2 inputs principally from corroborated observable market data (i.e., correlation values). See Note 15, Investment in Third Party , below for further details on the valuation method used. The Company updates the estimated fair value of this potential obligation quarterly. Any changes are recorded in its unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income.
The fair value hierarchy of the Company's marketable securities and investments at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 , was as follows (in thousands):

16

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 
Fair Value Measurement at
 
 
September 30, 2011
 
Description
September 30, 2011
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
 
Commercial paper
$
7,000

 
$

 
$
7,000

 
Money market funds
33,827

 
33,827

 

 
Certificates of deposit
10,000

 

 
10,000

 
Corporate securities
63,954

 

 
63,954

 
     Total
$
114,781

 
$
33,827

 
$
80,954

 

 
Fair Value Measurement at
 
 
December 31, 2010
 
Description
December 31, 2010
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
 
Commercial paper
$
7,135

 
$

 
$
7,135

 
Money market funds
52,951

 
52,951

 

 
U.S. Government debt securities
6,100

 

 
6,100

 
Corporate securities
54,523

 

 
54,523

 
     Total
$
120,709

 
$
52,951

 
$
67,758

 

The Company did not transfer any investments between level 1 and level 2 of the fair value hierarchy in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.

The Company was issued a $3.0 million note from SemiSouth in the second quarter of 2011, which was classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The note was classified as Level 3 as there was no market data for this instrument. The Company held the note to maturity, which occurred on August 15, 2011. The following table presents the changes in Level 3 investments for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 (in thousands):
 
 
Fair Value Measurement Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
 
Note Receivable
Beginning balance at January 1, 2011
 
$

Purchases and issuances
 
3,000

Settlements
 
(3,000
)
Ending balance at September 30, 2011
 
$


5. INVENTORIES:

Inventories (which consist of costs associated with the purchases of wafers from offshore foundries and of packaged components from offshore assembly manufacturers, as well as internal labor and overhead associated with the testing of both wafers and packaged components) are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Provisions, when required, are made to reduce excess and obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable values. Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

17

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 
September 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
Raw materials
$
9,636

 
$
20,334

Work-in-process
10,144

 
13,171

Finished goods
31,983

 
28,572

Total
$
51,763

 
$
62,077


6. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS:

The carrying amount of goodwill was $14.8 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 .

Intangible assets consist primarily of acquired licenses, in-process research and development and patent rights, and are reported net of accumulated amortization. In August 2010, the Company acquired an early-stage research and development company, resulting in the addition of in-process research and development of $4.7 million . In December 2010, the Company acquired Qspeed Semiconductor resulting in the addition of customer relationships of $0.9 million , and developed technology of $1.8 million (see Note 14, Acquisitions , below). The Company amortizes the cost of all intangible assets over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the term of the acquired license or patent rights, which range from five to ten years, with the exception of $4.7 million of in-process research and development which will be amortized once the development is completed and products are available for sale. The Company does not expect the amortization for its in-process research and development to begin in 2011 . Amortization for acquired intangible assets was approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 , respectively, and $0.7 million and $0.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 , respectively. The Company does not believe there is any significant residual value associated with the following intangible assets:
 
 
September 30, 2011
 
December 31, 2010
 
Gross
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
 
Gross
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
 
(in thousands)
In-process research and development
$
4,690

 
$

 
$
4,690

 
$
4,690

 
$

 
$
4,690

Technology licenses
3,000

 
(1,650
)
 
1,350

 
3,000

 
(1,425
)
 
1,575

Patent rights
1,949

 
(1,922
)
 
27

 
1,949

 
(1,760
)
 
189

Developed technology
2,920

 
(746
)
 
2,174

 
2,920

 
(489
)
 
2,431

Customer relationships
910

 
(85
)
 
825

 
910

 

 
910

Other intangibles
37

 
(37
)
 

 
37

 
(37
)
 

Total intangible assets
$
13,506

 
$
(4,440
)
 
$
9,066

 
$
13,506

 
$
(3,711
)
 
$
9,795


The estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets at September 30, 2011 is as follows:
 
Fiscal Year
Estimated
Amortization
(in  thousands)
2011
(remaining 3 months)
$
214

2012
 
755

2013
 
755

2014
 
754

2015
 
592

Thereafter
1,306

Total (1)
$
4,376

_______________
(1)
 The total above excludes $4.7 million of in-process research and development which will be amortized upon completion of development over the estimated useful life of the technology.

18

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


7. SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS AND EXPORT SALES:

Segment Reporting

The Company is organized and operates as one reportable segment, the design, development, manufacture and marketing of proprietary, high-voltage, analog integrated circuits for use primarily in the AC-DC power conversion markets. The Company's chief operating decision maker, the Chief Executive Officer, reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance.
Customer Concentration
Ten customers accounted for approximately 65% and 64% of net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 , respectively, and 65% and 64% of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 , respectively. A significant portion of these revenues are attributable to sales of the Company’s products to distributors of electronic components. These distributors sell the Company’s products to a broad, diverse range of end users, including OEMs and merchant power supply manufacturers.

The following customers accounted for 10% or more of total net revenues:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
Customer
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
A
19
%
 
18
%
 
19
%
 
16
%
B
12
%
 
11
%
 
12
%
 
11
%

Customers A and B are distributors of the Company's products. No other customers accounted for 10% or more of the Company's net revenues in those periods.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash investments and trade receivables. The Company has cash investment policies that limit cash investments to low-risk investments. With respect to trade receivables, the Company performs ongoing evaluations of its customers' financial conditions and requires letters of credit whenever deemed necessary. Additionally, the Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends related to past write-offs and other relevant information. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 , 71% and 76% , respectively, of accounts receivable were concentrated with the Company's top 10 customers.
The following customers represented 10% or more of accounts receivable:
 
Customer
September 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
A
21
%
 
21
%
B
15
%
 
*

 _______________
*less than 10%
Customers A and B are distributors of the Company’s products. No other customers accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s accounts receivable in these periods.
 
International Sales

The Company markets its products through its sales personnel and a worldwide network of distributors. As a

19

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

percentage of total net revenues, international sales, which consist of domestic and foreign sales to distributors and direct customers outside of the Americas, are comprised of the following:
 
Three Months  Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Hong Kong/China
40
%
 
35
%
 
38
%
 
32
%
Taiwan
18
%
 
23
%
 
21
%
 
24
%
Korea
16
%
 
18
%
 
16
%
 
19
%
Western Europe (excluding Germany)
10
%
 
9
%
 
10
%
 
8
%
Japan
7
%
 
5
%
 
6
%
 
6
%
Singapore
2
%
 
2
%
 
2
%
 
2
%
Germany
1
%
 
1
%
 
1
%
 
2
%
Other
2
%
 
1
%
 
2
%
 
2
%
Total foreign revenue
96
%
 
94
%
 
96
%
 
95
%
    
The remainder of the Company’s sales are to customers within the Americas, primarily located in the United States.

Product Sales

Approximately 97% to 99% of the Company's sales in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 , respectively, were from its three primary groupings of low-power AC-DC power-conversion products - TOPSwitch, TinySwitch and LinkSwitch. Approximately 1% to 3% of the Company's sales came from other product families, principally the Company's DPA-Switch family of high-voltage DC-DC products, and in the first three quarters of 2011 , the Company's Hiper family of products which includes both power-conversion and power-factor-correction products for high-power applications.

Revenue mix by product family for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
Product Family
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
LinkSwitch
43
%
 
39
%
 
42
%
 
37
%
TinySwitch
33
%
 
37
%
 
33
%
 
38
%
TOPSwitch
21
%
 
23
%
 
23
%
 
24
%
Other
3
%
 
1
%
 
2
%
 
1
%

8. EARNINGS PER SHARE:

  Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average shares of common stock and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive common equivalent shares included in this calculation consist of dilutive shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of outstanding common stock options, the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units and performance based awards, and the assumed issuance of awards under the stock purchase plan, as computed using the treasury stock method.

A summary of the earnings per share calculation is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

20

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Basic earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
7,512

 
$
12,634

 
$
27,965

 
$
40,534

Weighted-average common shares
28,799

 
27,894

 
28,789

 
27,737

Basic earnings per share
$
0.26

 
$
0.45

 
$
0.97

 
$
1.46

Diluted earnings per share (1):

 

 

 

Net income
$
7,512

 
$
12,634

 
$
27,965

 
$
40,534

Weighted-average common shares
28,799

 
27,894

 
28,789

 
27,737

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

Employee stock plans
1,080

 
1,389

 
1,406

 
1,669

Diluted weighted-average common shares
29,879

 
29,283

 
30,195

 
29,406

Diluted earnings per share
$
0.25

 
$
0.43

 
$
0.93

 
$
1.38

_______________ 

(1)
The Company includes the shares underlying performance-based awards in the calculation of diluted earnings per share when they become contingently issuable per ASC 260-10, Earnings per Share and excludes such shares when they are not contingently issuable. The Company has excluded all performance-based awards underlying the fiscal 2011 and 2010 awards as those shares were not contingently issuable as of the end of the period.

Approximately 410,000 shares and 530,000 shares attributable to stock-based awards for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 , respectively, and 276,000 shares and 139,000 shares attributable to stock-based awards for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 , respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the periods then ended because they were determined to be anti-dilutive.

9. PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES:

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of ASC 740. Under the provisions of ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, utilizing the tax rates that are expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities and projected future taxable income. The Company limits the deferred tax assets recognized related to certain highly-paid officers of the Company to amounts that it estimates will be deductible in future periods based upon the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). In the event that the Company determines, based on available evidence and management judgment, that all or part of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized in the future, the Company would record a valuation allowance in the period the determination is made. In addition, the calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with the Company’s expectations could have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position.

As of September 30, 2011 , the Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance on a portion of its California deferred tax assets as the Company believes that it is not more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be fully realized. The Company also maintains a valuation allowance with respect to certain of its deferred tax assets relating primarily to tax credits in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions.
    
Income tax expense includes a provision for federal, state and foreign taxes based on the annual estimated effective tax rate applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries, adjusted for certain discrete items which are fully recognized in the period they occur. The Company's effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 were 32.4% and 24.2% , respectively. The difference between the expected statutory rate of 35% and the Company's effective tax rate for

21

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was primarily due to the beneficial impact of the geographic distribution of the Company's world-wide earnings and the beneficial impact of a research and experimentation tax credit. The difference between the expected statutory rate of 35% and the Company's effective tax rate of 19.4% and 19.5% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 , respectively, was due primarily to the beneficial impact of the geographic distribution of the Company's world-wide earnings, and the favorable impact from the expected federal investment tax credit on the Company's solar-power installation.

Although the Company files U.S. federal, U.S. state, and foreign tax returns, its major tax jurisdiction is the U.S. In the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the IRS informed the Company that the IRS intends to propose adjustments to the Company's taxable income for fiscal years 2003 through 2006 related to the Company's intercompany research and development cost-sharing arrangement and related issues. The Company believes that the IRS position is without merit and intends to defend its tax return position vigorously. The fiscal years 2007 through 2009 are also under audit by the IRS.

Determining the consolidated provision for income tax expense, income tax liabilities and deferred tax assets and liabilities involves judgment. The Company calculates and provides for income taxes in each of the tax jurisdictions in which it operates, which involves estimating current tax exposures as well as making judgments regarding the recoverability of deferred tax assets in each jurisdiction. The estimates used could differ from actual results, which may have a significant impact on operating results in future periods.


10. INDEMNIFICATIONS:

The Company sells products to its distributors under contracts, collectively referred to as Distributor Sales Agreements (“DSA”). Each DSA contains the relevant terms of the contractual arrangement with the distributor, and generally includes certain provisions for indemnifying the distributor against losses, expenses, and liabilities from damages that may be awarded against the distributor in the event the Company's products are found to infringe upon a patent, copyright, trademark, or other proprietary right of a third party (“Customer Indemnification”). The DSA generally limits the scope of and remedies for the Customer Indemnification obligations in a variety of industry-standard respects, including, but not limited to, limitations based on time and geography, and a right to replace an infringing product. The Company also, from time to time, has granted a specific indemnification right to individual customers.
    
The Company believes its internal development processes and other policies and practices limit its exposure related to such indemnifications. In addition, the Company requires its employees to sign a proprietary information and inventions agreement, which assigns the rights to its employees' development work to the Company. To date, the Company has not had to reimburse any of its distributors or customers for any losses related to these indemnifications and no material claims were outstanding as of September 30, 2011 . For several reasons, including the lack of prior indemnification claims and the lack of a monetary liability limit for certain infringement cases, the Company cannot determine the maximum amount of potential future payments, if any, related to such indemnifications.

11. COMMITMENTS:

The Company purchases wafers through purchase orders from its foundries. All but one of the Company's wafer agreements were executed in U.S. currency. Until June 2011, this one foundry required wafer purchases to be in Japanese yen; however, the purchase price within this agreement was fixed at a base rate and allowed for some sharing of the impact of exchange rate fluctuations from the base rate. The currency fluctuation experienced between the time invoices were submitted to the Company until the time the yen was purchased and remitted to the supplier was a financial responsibility of the Company. The Company accounted for the gain or loss related to the payment of these transactions as part of other income or expense. The Company has renegotiated its supply agreement with this foundry to purchase wafers in U.S. currency, see below for our revised supply agreement.

Two of our major suppliers have wafer supply agreements based in U.S. dollars; however, our agreements with these foundries also allow for mutual sharing of the impact of the exchange rate fluctuation between Japanese yen and the U.S. dollar. Each year, our management and these suppliers review and negotiate pricing; the negotiated pricing is denominated in U.S. dollars but is subject to contractual exchange rate provisions. The fluctuation in the exchange rate is shared equally between the Company and each of these suppliers.     



22

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

12. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONTINGENCIES:

From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company becomes involved in lawsuits, or customers and distributors may make claims against the Company. In accordance with ASC 450-10, the Company makes a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.

On October 20, 2004, the Company filed a complaint against Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. and Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation (referred to collectively as "Fairchild") in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. In its complaint, the Company alleged that Fairchild has and is infringing four of Power Integrations' patents pertaining to PWM integrated circuit devices. Fairchild denied infringement and asked for a declaration from the court that it does not infringe any Power Integration patent and that the patents are invalid. The Court issued a claim construction order on March 31, 2006 which was favorable to the Company. The Court set a first trial on the issues of infringement, willfulness and damages for October 2, 2006. At the close of the first trial, on October 10, 2006, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the Company finding all asserted claims of all four patents-in-suit to be willfully infringed by Fairchild and awarding $34.0 million in damages. Although the jury awarded damages, at this stage of the proceedings the Company cannot state the amount, if any, which it might ultimately recover from Fairchild, and no benefits have been recorded in the Company's consolidated financial statements as a result of the damages award. Fairchild also raised defenses contending that the asserted patents are invalid or unenforceable, and the court held a second trial on these issues beginning on September 17, 2007. On September 21, 2007, the jury returned a verdict in the Company's favor, affirming the validity of the asserted claims of all four patents-in-suit. Fairchild submitted further materials on the issue of enforceability along with various other post-trial motions, and the Company filed post-trial motions seeking a permanent injunction and increased damages and attorneys' fees, among other things. On September 24, 2008, the Court denied Fairchild's motion regarding enforceability and ruled that all four patents are enforceable. On December 12, 2008, the Court ruled on the remaining post-trial motions, including granting a permanent injunction, reducing the damages award to $6.1 million , granting Fairchild a new trial on the issue of willful infringement in view of an intervening change in the law, and denying the Company's motion for increased damages and attorneys' fees with leave to renew the motion after the resolution of the issue of willful infringement. On December 22, 2008, at Fairchild's request, the Court temporarily stayed the permanent injunction for 90 days to permit Fairchild to petition the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals for a further stay. On January 12, 2009, Fairchild filed a notice of appeal challenging the Court's refusal to enter a more permanent stay of the injunction, and Fairchild filed additional motions requesting that both the Federal Circuit and the District Court extend the stay of injunction. The District Court temporarily extended the stay pending the Federal Circuit ruling on Fairchild's pending motion, but the Federal Circuit dismissed Fairchild's appeal and denied its motion on May 5, 2009, and the District Court issued an order on May 13, 2009 confirming the reinstatement of the permanent injunction as originally entered in December 2008. On June 22, 2009, the Court held a brief bench re-trial on the issue of willful infringement, and the parties completed post-trial briefing on the issue of willfulness shortly thereafter. On July 22, 2010, the Court found that Fairchild willfully infringed all four of the asserted patents. The Court also invited briefing on enhanced damages and attorneys' fees, and Fairchild filed a motion requesting that the Court amend its findings regarding willfulness. On January 18, 2011, the Court denied Fairchild's request to amend the findings regarding Fairchild's willful infringement and doubled the damages award against Fairchild but declined to award attorneys' fees. On February 3, 2011, the Court entered final judgment in favor of the Company for a total damages award of $12.9 million . Fairchild has filed a notice of appeal challenging the final judgment and a number of the underlying rulings, and the Company has filed a cross-appeal seeking to increase the damages award. Briefing on the appeal is now complete, and a hearing is expected in the coming months.

On May 9, 2005, the Company filed a Complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. section 1337 against System General (“SG”). The Company filed a supplement to the complaint on May 24, 2005. The Company alleged infringement of its patents pertaining to pulse width modulation (“PWM”) integrated circuit devices produced by SG, which are used in power conversion applications such as power supplies for computer monitors. The Commission instituted an investigation on June 8, 2005 in response to the Company's complaint. SG filed a response to the ITC complaint asserting that the patents-in-suit were invalid and not infringed. The Company subsequently and voluntarily narrowed the number of patents and claims in suit, which proceeded to a hearing. The hearing on the investigation was held before the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) from January 18 to January 24, 2006. Post-hearing briefs were submitted and briefing concluded February 24, 2006. The ALJ's initial determination was issued on May 15, 2006. The ALJ found all remaining asserted claims valid and infringed, and recommended the exclusion of the infringing products as well as certain downstream products that contain the infringing products. After further briefing, on June 30, 2006 the Commission decided not to review the initial determination on liability, but did invite briefs on remedy, bonding and the public interest. On August 11, 2006 the Commission issued an order excluding from entry into the United States the infringing SG PWM chips, and any LCD computer monitors, AC printer

23

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

adapters and sample/demonstration circuit boards containing an infringing SG chip. The U.S. Customs Service is authorized to enforce the exclusion order. On October 11, 2006, the presidential review period expired without any action from the President, and the ITC exclusion order is now in full effect. SG appealed the ITC decision, and on November 19, 2007, the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC's findings in all respects. On October 27, 2008, SG filed a petition to modify the exclusion order in view of a recent Federal Circuit opinion in an unrelated case, and the Company responded to oppose any modification, but the Commission modified the exclusion order on February 27, 2009. Nevertheless, the exclusion order still prohibits SG and related entities from importing the infringing SG chips and any LCD computer monitors, AC printer adapters, and sample/demonstration circuit boards containing an infringing SG chip.

On May 23, 2008, the Company filed a complaint against Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and Fairchild's wholly-owned subsidiary System General Corporation (“SG”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. In its complaint, the Company alleged that Fairchild has infringed and is infringing three patents pertaining to power supply controller integrated circuit devices. Fairchild answered the Company's complaint on November 7, 2008, denying infringement and asking for a declaration from the Court that it does not infringe any Power Integrations patent and that the patents are invalid and unenforceable. Fairchild's answer also included counterclaims accusing the Company of infringing three patents pertaining to primary side power conversion integrated circuit devices. Fairchild had earlier brought these same claims in a separate suit against the Company, also in Delaware, which Fairchild dismissed in favor of adding its claims to the Company's already pending suit against Fairchild. The Company has answered Fairchild's counterclaims, denying infringement and asking for a declaration from the Court that it does not infringe any Fairchild patent and that the Fairchild patents are invalid. Fairchild also filed a motion to stay the case, but the Court denied that motion on December 19, 2008. On March 5, 2009, Fairchild filed a motion for summary judgment to preclude any recovery for post-verdict sales of parts found to infringe in the parties' other ongoing litigation, described above, and the Company filed its opposition and a cross-motion to preclude Fairchild from re-litigating the issues of infringement and damages for those same products. On June 26, 2009, the Court held a hearing on the parties' motions, and on July 9, 2009 the Court issued an order denying the parties' motions but staying proceedings with respect to the products that were found to infringe and which are subject to the injunction in the other Delaware case between the parties pending the entry of final judgment in that case; the remainder of the case is proceeding. On December 18, 2009, the Court issued an order construing certain terms in the asserted claims of the Company's and Fairchild's patents in suit. Following the Court's ruling on claim construction, Fairchild withdrew its claim related to one of its patents and significantly reduced the number of claims asserted for the remaining two patents. The parties thereafter filed and argued a number of motions for summary judgment, and the Court denied the majority of the parties' motions but granted the Company's motion to preclude Fairchild from re-arguing validity positions that were rejected in the prior case between the parties. Because the assigned Judge retired at the end of July 2010, the case was re-assigned to a different Judge, and the Court vacated the trial schedule and had the parties provide their input on the appropriate course of action. The Court thereafter set a trial schedule with the jury trial on infringement and validity to begin in July 2011. On February 10, 2011, the Court issued an order maintaining the stay with respect to the products that were found to infringe and which are subject to the injunction in the other Delaware case pending the appeal in that case. On April 18, 2011, the Court rescheduled the trial to begin in January 2012, and on June 2, 2011 the Court moved the trial date to permit the parties to address another patent the Company has accused Fairchild of infringing. Trial is currently scheduled to begin in April 2012.

On June 28, 2004, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, against SG Corporation, a Taiwanese company, and its U.S. subsidiary. The Company's complaint alleged that certain integrated circuits produced by SG infringed and continue to infringe certain of its patents. On June 10, 2005, in response to the initiation of the International Trade Commission (ITC) investigation discussed above, the District Court stayed all proceedings. Subsequent to the completion of the ITC proceedings, the District Court temporarily lifted the stay and scheduled a case management conference. On December 6, 2006, SG filed a notice of appeal of the ITC decision as discussed above. In response, and by agreement of the parties, the District Court vacated the scheduled case management conference and renewed the stay of proceedings pending the outcome of the Federal Circuit appeal of the ITC determination. On November 19, 2007, the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC's findings in all respects, and SG did not file a petition for review. The parties subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the District Court case without prejudice. On November 4, 2009, the Company re-filed its complaint for patent infringement against SG and its parent corporations, Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. and Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, to address their continued infringement of patents at issue in the original suit that recently emerged from SG requested reexamination proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The Company seeks, among other things, an order enjoining Fairchild and SG from infringing the Company's patents and an award of damages resulting from the alleged infringement. Fairchild has denied infringement and

24

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

asked for a declaration from the Court that it does not infringe any Power Integrations patent, that the patents are invalid, and that one of the two patents now at issue in the case is unenforceable. On May 5, 2010, Fairchild and SG filed an amended answer including counterclaims accusing the Company of infringing two patents; the Company contests these new claims vigorously, and since that time Fairchild has withdrawn its claim for infringement of one of the patents it asserted against the Company, leaving just one Fairchild patent in the case. The Court held a claim construction hearing on March 24, 2011 and issued a first claim construction order regarding the Company's asserted patents on July 13, 2011 and a second claim construction order regarding Fairchild's asserted patent on August 30, 2011. Discovery is currently under way.

In February 2010, Fairchild and System General (“SG”) filed suits for patent infringement against the Company, Power Integrations Netherlands B.V., and representative offices of Power Integrations Netherlands in Shanghai and Shenzhen with the Suzhou Intermediate Court in the People's Republic of China. The proceedings are still in their early stages, with no hearings or trial currently scheduled. The suits assert four Chinese patents and seek an injunction and damages of approximately $17.0 million . Power Integrations Netherlands has filed invalidation proceedings for all four asserted SG patents in the People's Republic of China Patent Reexamination Board (PRB) of the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO), and all four challenges were accepted by the PRB, with hearings conducted in September 2010 and rulings expected in the coming months. The Company believes the Fairchild and SG claims discussed above are without merit and intends to contest them vigorously.

On July 11, 2011, the Company filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, against David Kappos in his capacity as Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) as part of the ongoing reexamination proceedings related to one of the patents asserted against Fairchild and SG in the Delaware litigation described above. The Company filed a motion for summary judgment on a preliminary jurisdictional issue, and the PTO filed a cross-motion to dismiss on this same issue; briefing on these motions is now complete, with a ruling expected in the coming months. No schedule has been set for the case.    

The Company is unable to predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty, and there can be no assurance that Power Integrations will prevail in the above-mentioned unsettled litigations. These litigations, whether or not determined in Power Integrations' favor or settled, will be costly and will divert the efforts and attention of the Company's management and technical personnel from normal business operations, potentially causing a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and operating results. Currently the company is not able to estimate a loss or a range of loss for the ongoing litigation disclosed above, however adverse determinations in litigation could result in monetary losses, the loss of proprietary rights, subject the Company to significant liabilities, require Power Integrations to seek licenses from third parties or prevent the Company from licensing the technology, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and operating results.

In the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the IRS informed the Company that the IRS intends to propose adjustments to the Company's taxable income for the years 2003 through 2006 related to the Company's intercompany research and development cost-sharing arrangement and related issues (refer to Note 9 for further details). The Company believes that the IRS position is without merit and intends to defend its tax return position vigorously.

While there can be no assurances as to the ultimate outcome of any litigation involving the Company, management does not believe any such pending legal proceeding or claim will result in a judgment or settlement that would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

13. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amendments to the FASB Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) relating to fair value measurements, Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement, ASC Topic 820. The amendments clarify the application of existing fair value measurement requirements and results in common measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The Company will apply these amendments prospectively beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the application of these amendments will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income ( ASC Topic 220). This amendment gives an entity two options to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income. An entity can elect to present comprehensive income in either (1) a single continuous statement of

25

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

comprehensive income, or (2) in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The Company will apply this amendment beginning in the first quarter of 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the application of this amendment will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment, (ASC Topic 350). Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to perform the first step of the two-step impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing the fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the entity is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. An entity may resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The amendments are effective for annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted.

On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted the following accounting pronouncements:

In December 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29 , Business Combinations (ASC Topic 805). The amendments in this update specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also improve the usefulness of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosures by requiring a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments that are directly attributable to the business combination(s). The amendments in this update were effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2011 did not have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic 350). Under Topic 350 on goodwill and other intangible assets, testing for goodwill impairment is a two-step test. When a goodwill impairment test is performed (either on an annual or interim basis), an entity must assess whether the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value (Step 1). If it does, an entity must perform an additional test to determine whether goodwill has been impaired and to calculate the amount of that impairment (Step 2). The amendments in this update modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. The qualitative factors require that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The amendments in this update were effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU in the first quarter of 2011 did not have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Instruments.” ASU No. 2010-06 amends ASC 820 to require additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Specifically, the ASU requires entities to disclose the amounts and reasons for significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, to disclose reasons for any transfers in or out of Level 3 and to separately disclose information in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. In addition, the ASU also amends ASC 820 to clarify certain existing disclosure requirements. Except for the requirement to disclose information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements separately, the amendments to ASC 820 made by ASU No. 2010-06 were effective for the Company's 2010 interim and annual reporting periods. The requirement to separately disclose purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of recurring Level 3 measurements is effective for the Company's 2011 interim and annual reporting

26

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

periods. The adoption of these provisions did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

14. ACQUISITIONS:

On February 26, 2010, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase the assets of an early-stage research and development company involved in developing certain technology that is consistent with the Company's long-term business strategy, for cash totaling $11.5 million .  The Company accounted for the transaction as an acquisition of a business and completed the acquisition on August 26, 2010. The Company allocated $6.2 million of the purchase price to goodwill, which is deductible for tax purposes, $4.7 million to in-process research and development, which the Company will amortize over the estimated life of the technology upon completion of its development (the Company does not expect to amortize in-process research and development within the current year), and $0.6 million to fixed assets. The Company also expensed $0.4 million of acquisition-related costs which were recorded as general and administrative expense in 2010. Goodwill recognized in the acquisition was derived from expected benefits from future technology, cost synergies and a knowledgeable and experienced workforce.

On December 31, 2010, the Company acquired certain assets of Qspeed Semiconductor for approximately $7.0 million in cash. The Company accounted for the transaction as an acquisition of a business.

The Company's acquisition of Qspeed effectively settled a preexisting license agreement under which the Company had paid Qspeed a prepaid royalty of $5.25 million in exchange for the use of its technology. Because the terms of the license agreement were determined to represent fair value at the acquisition date, the Company did not record any gain or loss separately from the acquisition and the $5.25 million unamortized prepaid royalty was included as part of the acquisition-date fair value of consideration transferred.

Fair value consideration consists of the following (in thousands):

Cash
 
$
6,955

Settlement of preexisting arrangement
 
 
5,250

 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
12,205


Of the total consideration transferred, $6.8 million was allocated to goodwill, which is deductible for tax purposes, $1.8 million was allocated to developed technology, $0.9 million was allocated to customer relationships, $0.4 million was allocated to fixed assets, $2.1 million was allocated to inventory, including $0.6 million of inventory markup, which will be amortized to cost of revenues, and $0.2 million was allocated to accounts receivable. Goodwill recognized in the acquisition of Qspeed Semiconductor was derived from expected benefits from future technology, cost synergies and a knowledgeable and experienced workforce.

15. INVESTMENT IN THIRD PARTY:

On October 22, 2010, the Company made a $7.0 million investment in preferred stock of a privately held company, SemiSouth Laboratories (“SemiSouth”). Also in October 2010, the Company paid $10.0 million as a prepaid royalty in exchange for the right to use SemiSouth's technology. The Company will amortize the royalty to cost of revenues based on the Company's sales of products incorporating the licensed technology. The Company classified its investment, with a carrying value of $7.0 million , and prepaid royalty of $10.0 million within Other Assets in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2011. The Company does not expect to amortize the prepaid royalty in 2011 .     

In February 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with SemiSouth to provide a lease line for the financing of capital equipment. Under the term of the agreement, SemiSouth can borrow up to $8.6 million through January 2013. As of September 30, 2011, a total of $8.0 million had been funded, comprised of; $3.9 million funded, less payments withheld under this lease arrangement to finance capital equipment commencing in February 2011, and $4.1 million paid as deposits on equipment which the Company will lease to SemiSouth upon delivery of such equipment, refer to Note 17, Lease Line to Third Party , for details. The Company included the lease line receivable and deposits on equipment in Other Assets and Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets in its condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2011.
The Company has determined that its investment in SemiSouth, in which the Company holds less than 20% equity interest, is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The primary factors in the

27

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Company's assessment were; (i) SemiSouth's management team and board of directors were solely responsible for all business and financial decisions for SemiSouth and (ii) the Company does not have the ability through this VIE to direct the activities that significantly impact the economic performance of SemiSouth. The Company accounts for its non-marketable investment in SemiSouth under the cost method.

The Company's maximum exposure to loss as a result of its interest in SemiSouth is limited to the aggregate of the carrying value of our equity investment, and up to $8.6 million for the lease line agreement. There were no additional future funding commitments to SemiSouth as of September 30, 2011.
The Company's investment in SemiSouth is periodically reviewed for other-than-temporary declines in fair value by considering available evidence, including general market conditions, SemiSouth's financial condition, pricing in recent rounds of financing, earnings and cash flow forecasts, recent operational performance and any other readily available market data.  

The Company's 2010 agreement with SemiSouth provides, among other things, that the Company has the option to acquire SemiSouth in the future (“Call Option”) and that the Company may be obligated to acquire SemiSouth at a future date if SemiSouth achieves certain financial performance conditions (“Put Option”). The Put and Call Options terminate on the date that is approximately a month following delivery to the Company of SemiSouth's financial statements for the quarter ending June 30, 2013.

The Call Option can be exercised by the Company at a multiple of SemiSouth's annualized net operating profits after tax (“NOPAT”) (based on the average of such measures during certain months), as defined in the agreement. The multiple is intended to result in an acquisition price equal to the estimated fair value of SemiSouth. The minimum acquisition price would be $36 million .

The Put Option can only be exercised by SemiSouth once certain revenue and profit metrics have been reached.  At that time, SemiSouth could obligate the Company to acquire SemiSouth at a multiple of SemiSouth's NOPAT. The multiple is intended to result in an acquisition price equal to the estimated fair value of SemiSouth. In order to reach the revenue and profit metrics required to exercise the Put Option, SemiSouth would need to increase its quarterly revenue to approximately 27 times the level of revenues in the third quarter of 2011.

The NOPAT multiple was determined to reflect fair value based on the Market Approach using Level 2 inputs that are derived principally from observable market data by comparing multiples for similar publicly traded companies. Due to the fact that the strike price of the Call Option and Put Option is continually being adjusted to reflect the changes in the fair value of SemiSouth, neither the Put Option nor the Call Option are expected to have value.  Based on these factors, the fair value of the Put/Call Option was determined to be zero.

In July 2011, SemiSouth obtained $15 million of additional financing through the sale, and concurrent licensing back, of its intellectual property ("IP") with a financing company. In connection with this arrangement, the Company entered into a contingent purchase commitment with the financing company for SemiSouth's IP. The contingent purchase commitment requires the Company to purchase the IP previously owned by SemiSouth from its new owner for $15 million (plus reimbursement of certain expenses) under certain conditions generally relating to SemiSouth's failure to make certain payments or SemiSouth's insolvency. In this event, the agreement sets forth a process to be followed before the Company's purchase commitment matures. First, the agreement allows the Company to exercise its Call Option for a certain period of time and under certain conditions. If the Company does not initially exercise its Call Option, then SemiSouth can be sold to a third party during a period of time of up to approximately half a year (which period of time may be shortened by the new SemiSouth IP owner) or the Company could still exercise its Call Option. After that period of time elapses, the Company is obligated to purchase the SemiSouth IP for $15 million (plus reimbursement of certain expenses). The Company provided a $15 million letter of credit in August 2011 to the financing company to secure the contingent purchase commitment.
 
In addition, the Company entered into a contract in July 2011 with SemiSouth to act as a sales representative for SemiSouth. The sales representation agreement will allow the Company to earn a fee for its efforts in representing, promoting and soliciting orders for SemiSouth products. The contract can be terminated with or without cause by giving prior written notice to the other party.
 

16. SUPPLIER AGREEMENT:


28

Table of Contents
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO (Unaudited) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The Company entered into a wafer supply agreement amendment with one of its foundries in the third quarter of 2008, which amended its previous agreement with the foundry. The amended agreement includes a Company prepayment of $3.1 million for raw materials. Purchases of raw materials under this agreement were made based upon production build plans of the Company's wafers. As of December 31, 2010 , $0.9 million remained prepaid under this agreement, and in the six months ended June 30, 2011, this prepayment was fully amortized. The Company included the prepayment in prepaid expenses and other current assets in its December 31, 2010 , condensed consolidated balance sheet.

17. LEASE LINE TO THIRD PARTY:
In February 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with SemiSouth to provide a lease line for the financing of capital equipment. Under the term of the agreement, SemiSouth can borrow up to $8.6 million through January 2013 (reduced from $15.5 million at March 31, 2011). As of September 30, 2011 , a total of $8.0 million had been funded, comprised of; $3.9 million funded, less payments withheld under this lease arrangement to finance capital equipment commencing in February 2011, and $4.1 million paid as deposits on equipment which the Company will lease to SemiSouth upon delivery of such equipment. The Company included the lease line receivable and deposits on equipment in Other Assets and Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets in its condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2011 . The total lease payments related to the $3.9 million funded, including interest, will be received over a four-to-eight year term and are reflected in the table below (in millions):

Fiscal Year
 
Total Minimum Lease Payments
2011 (remaining 3 months)
 
$
0.1

2012
 
0.6

2013
 
0.6

2014
 
0.6

2015
 
0.6

Thereafter
 
1.7

Total
 
$
4.2


The Company assessed the credit worthiness of SemiSouth at the inception of the lease line, and is monitoring their credit quality on an ongoing basis. If the credit worthiness of SemiSouth diminishes the Company will establish a specific reserve against the lease line receivable at that time.

18. BANK LINE OF CREDIT:

In February 2011, the Company entered into an unsecured credit agreement with a bank (the “Credit Agreement”). Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Company can request, from time to time until February 2013, advances in an amount not to exceed an aggregate principal amount of $50.0 million , the proceeds of which can be used for working capital requirements and other general corporate purposes. The agreement also covers advances for commercial letters of credit. At September 30, 2011 , the Company had a $15.0 million outstanding letter of credit in connection with a existing contingent purchase commitment (refer to Note 15, Investment in Third Party , for further details). The terms of this credit agreement require the Company to remain in compliance with certain financial and other covenants, which the Company is currently in compliance with.


19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

In November 2011, the board of directors authorized the use of $30.0 million for the repurchase of the Company's common stock. Any repurchases will be executed according to certain pre-defined price/volume guidelines set by the board of directors. There is no expiration date for this repurchase program.



29

Table of Contents



ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 15, 2011, and with management's discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the SEC on February 25, 2011. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, including our financial outlook, that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those contained in these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed in Part II, Item 1A-“Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report.

Overview
We design, develop, manufacture and market high-voltage, analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits (“ICs”) and high-voltage diodes for use in electronic power supplies, also known as switched-mode power supplies. Our ICs and diodes are used principally in AC-DC power supplies in a wide variety of end products, primarily in the consumer, communications, computer and industrial electronics markets. For example, our ICs are commonly used in such end products as mobile-phone chargers, desktop computers, home entertainment equipment, appliances, utility meters and LED light bulbs and fixtures.
We believe that our products enable power supplies that are superior to those designed with alternative technologies. We differentiate our ICs through innovation aimed at helping our customers meet the desired performance specifications for their power supplies, including increasingly stringent energy-efficiency requirements, while minimizing complexity, component count, time-to-market and overall system cost. We invest significant resources in research and development in an effort to achieve this differentiation.
While the size of the power-supply market fluctuates with changes in macroeconomic conditions, the market has generally exhibited a modest growth rate over time as growth in the unit volumes of power supplies has largely been offset by reductions in the average selling price of components in this market. Therefore, the growth of our business depends primarily on our penetration of the power supply market, and our success in expanding the addressable market by introducing new products that address a wider range of applications. Our growth strategy includes the following elements:

Increase the penetration of our ICs in the “low-power” AC-DC power supply market. The vast majority of our revenues come from power-supply applications requiring 50 watts of output or less. We continue to introduce more advanced products that make our IC-based solutions more attractive in this market. We have also increased the size of our sales and field-engineering staff considerably in recent years, and we continue to expand our offerings of technical documentation and design-support tools and services in order to help customers use our ICs. These tools and services include our PI Expert™ design software, which we offer free of charge, and our transformer-sample service.

Capitalize on the growing demand for more energy-efficient electronic products and lighting technologies. We believe that energy-efficiency is becoming an increasingly important design criterion for power supplies due largely to the emergence of standards and specifications that encourage, and in some cases mandate, the design of more energy-efficient electronic products. While power supplies built with competing technologies are often unable to meet these standards cost-effectively, power supplies incorporating our ICs are generally able to comply with all known efficiency specifications currently in effect.
Additionally, technological advances combined with regulatory and legislative actions are resulting in the adoption of alternative lighting technologies such as light-emitting diodes, or LED. We believe this presents a significant opportunity for us because our ICs are used in power-supply (or “driver”) circuitry for high-voltage LED lighting applications.

Increase the penetration of our products in “high-power” applications. We believe we have developed and acquired new technologies and products that enable us to bring the benefits of highly integrated power supplies to applications requiring more than 50 watts of output. These include such applications as main power supplies for flat-panel TVs and desktop PCs, as well as power supplies for LED streetlights, game consoles, and notebook computers, among others.


30

Table of Contents

Our quarterly operating results are difficult to predict and subject to significant fluctuations. We plan our production and inventory levels based on internal forecasts of projected customer demand, which is highly unpredictable and can fluctuate substantially. Customers typically may cancel or reschedule orders on short notice without significant penalty and, conversely, often place orders with very short lead times to delivery. Also, external factors such as global economic conditions and supply-chain dynamics can cause our operating results to be volatile. For example, our revenues decreased 6% in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the prior quarter, and we expect a further decrease in the subsequent quarter; we believe the downturn in revenues is primarily the result of global macroeconomic factors.

Our net revenues were $75.1 million and $232.0 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $75.5 million and $226.8 million in the same periods of 2010. The slight decrease for the three-month period was driven primarily by lower sales of our products into the communications end market, where our products are primarily used in cell-phone chargers. The decline was partially offset by increased sales into the consumer, industrial and computer end markets. The increase for the nine-month period was driven primarily by increased sales into the industrial and computer end markets, partially offset by slightly lower sales into the communications end market.
 
Our top ten customers, including distributors that resell our products to OEMs and merchant power supply manufacturers, accounted for 65% of our net revenues in both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 64% of our net revenues in both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. Our top two customers, both distributors of our products, collectively accounted for approximately 31% of our net revenues in both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. In 2010, our top two customers, both distributors of our products, collectively accounted for approximately 29% and 27% of our net revenues, in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30 2011, respectively. International sales comprised 96% of our net revenues in both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, and 94% and 95% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
  
Because our industry is intensely price-sensitive, our gross margin (gross profit divided by net revenues) is subject to change based on the relative pricing of solutions that compete with ours. Variations in product and customer mix can also cause our gross margin to fluctuate. Also, because we purchase a large percentage of our silicon wafers from foundries located in Japan, our gross margin is influenced by fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen. Changes in the prices of raw materials used in our products, such as certain metals, can also affect our gross margin. Although our wafer-fabrication and assembly operations are outsourced, as are most of our test operations, a portion of our production costs are fixed in nature. As a result, our unit costs and gross profit margin are impacted by the volume of units we produce.

Our gross profit margin was 47% of net revenues in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared with 52% of net revenues and 51% of net revenues, respectively, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease was due primarily to higher input costs as well as a less favorable product mix; the increase in input costs was driven primarily by the decline in the value of the U.S. dollar versus the Japanese yen, which has increased the cost of silicon wafers purchased from our Japanese wafer fabrication foundries, as well as the rise in the prices of certain materials, primarily gold and copper, used in the assembly of our products. While we cannot necessarily predict the future direction of our gross margin because many of the factors influencing it are outside of our control, we expect our gross margin to improve in the fourth quarter of this year as a result of product-cost improvements, primarily driven by silicon cost reductions.

Total operating expenses in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 were $24.5 million and $73.7 million, respectively, and $23.8 million and $67.5 million in the same periods in 2010, respectively. The increase in both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared with the same periods in the prior year, was driven primarily by increased payroll and related expenses due to increased headcount, including higher research and development headcount resulting from an acquisition we completed in the third quarter of 2010 and increases in sales and marketing headcount as a result of growth in our sales force. These increases were partially offset by decreased stock-based compensation expense, lower acquisition-related expenses (we acquired two businesses in 2010, refer to Note 14, Acquisitions , in our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, for details) and reduced legal expenses related to patent litigation (refer to Note 12, Legal Proceedings and Contingencies , in our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for recent activity).

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those listed below. We base our estimates on historical facts and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable at the time the estimates are made. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

31

Table of Contents


Our critical accounting policies are as follows:
revenue recognition;
stock-based compensation;
estimating distributor pricing credits;
estimating write-downs for excess and obsolete inventory;
income taxes; and
goodwill and intangible assets.

Our critical accounting policies are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and require us to make judgments and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. A brief description of these critical accounting policies is set forth below. For more information regarding our accounting policies, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , in our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue recognition

Product revenues consist of sales to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), merchant power supply manufacturers and distributors. Shipping terms to international OEM customers and merchant power supply manufacturers from our facility in California are “delivered at frontier” (“DAF”), under which title to the product passes to the customer and revenue is recognized when the shipment reaches the destination country. Shipping terms to international OEMs and merchant power supply manufacturers on shipments from our facility outside of the United States are “EX Works” (EXW), meaning that title to the product transfers to the customer upon shipment from our foreign warehouse. Shipments to OEMs and merchant power supply manufacturers in the Americas are “free on board” (“FOB”) point of origin meaning that title is passed to the customer upon shipment. Revenue is recognized upon title transfer for sales to OEMs and merchant power supply manufacturers, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition are met as described below.

We apply the provisions of ASC 605-10 (formerly Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition) and all related appropriate guidance. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria have been met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred, (3) the price is fixed or determinable and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. We generally use customer purchase orders to determine the existence of an arrangement. We consider delivery to have occurred when title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer. We consider the price to be fixed based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. We assess collectability based on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks we perform as well as the customer's payment history.

We make sales to distributors and retail partners and recognize revenue based on a sell-through method. Sales to distributors are made under terms allowing certain price protection and rights of return on our products held by the distributors. As a result of these rights, we defer the recognition of revenue and the costs of revenues derived from sales to distributors until such distributors resell our products to thei r end customers. We determine the a mount to defer based on the level of actual inventory on hand at our distributors as well as inventory in transit to our distributors. Fluctuations in deferred income on sales to distributors coincide with an increase or decrease in revenue shipments to our distributors; in addition, deferred income levels are also impacted by the speed at which our distributors sell our products to their end customers. The gross profit that is deferred as a result of this policy is reflected as “deferred income on sales to distributors” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The total deferred revenue as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately $22.1 million and $24.7 million , respectively. The total deferred cost as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately $11.8 million and $12.5 million , respectively.

Stock-based compensation

We apply the provisions of ASC 718-10, Share-Based Payment . Under the provisions of ASC 718-10, we recognize the fair value of stock-based compensation in financial statements over the requisite service period of the individual grants, which generally equals a four-year vesting period. We use estimates of volatility, expected term, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield and forfeitures in determining the fair value of these awards and the amount of compensation cost to recognize. Changes in these estimates could result in changes to our compensation charges.

Estimating distributor pricing credits

Historically, approximately two-thirds of our total sales have been made through distributors. Frequently, distributors need a cost lower than our standard sales price in order to win business. After the distributor ships product to its customer, the

32

Table of Contents

distributor submits a “ship and debit” claim to us in order to adjust its cost from the standard price to the approved lower price. After verification by us, a credit memo is issued to the distributor to adjust the sell-in price from the standard distribution price to the pre-approved lower price. We maintain a reserve for these credits that appears as a reduction to accounts receivable in our consolidated balance sheets. Any increase in the reserve results in a corresponding reduction in our current and/or future net revenues. To establish the adequacy of our reserves, we analyze historical ship and debit amounts and levels of inventory in the distributor channels. If our reserves are not adequate, our net revenues could be adversely affected.

Estimating write-downs for excess and obsolete inventory

When evaluating the adequacy of our valuation adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory, we identify excess and obsolete products and also analyze historical usage, forecasted production based on demand forecasts, current economic trends and historical write-offs . This write-down is reflected as a reduction to inventory in the consolidated balance sheets and an increase in cost of revenues. If actual market conditions are less favorable than our assumptions, we may be required to take additional write-downs, which could adversely impact our cost of revenues and operating results.

Income taxes

Income tax expense is an estimate of current income taxes payable or refundable in the current fiscal year based on reported income before income taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the effect of temporary differences and carry-forwards that are recognized for financial reporting and income tax purposes.

We account for income taxes under the provisions of ASC 740 (formerly SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes). Under the provisions of ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, utilizing the tax rates that are expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We recognize valuation allowances to reduce any deferred tax assets to the amount that we estimate will more likely than not be realized based on available evidence and management’s judgment. We limit the deferred tax assets recognized related to certain of our officers’ compensation to amounts that we estimate will be deductible in future periods based upon Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). In the event that we determine, based on available evidence and management judgment, that all or part of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized in the future, we would record a valuation allowance in the period the determination is made. In addition, the calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with our expectations could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.
  
As of September 30, 2011 , we continue to maintain a valuation allowance on a portion of our California deferred tax assets as we believe that it is not more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be fully realized. We also maintain a valuation allowance with respect to certain of our deferred tax assets relating primarily to tax credits in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions.

In the first quarter of 2011, the IRS informed us that it intends to propose adjustments to our taxable income for fiscal years 2003 thru 2006 related to our intercompany research and development cost-sharing arrangement and related issues. We believe the IRS's position with respect to the proposed adjustment is inconsistent with applicable tax law, and that we have a meritorious defense to our position. Accordingly, we intend to continue to challenge the IRS's position on this matter vigorously. While we believe the IRS's asserted position on this matter is not supported by applicable law, we have provided reserves for our position in this matter, and we may be required to make payments to the IRS pending resolution of this matter. If this matter is litigated and the IRS is able to successfully sustain its position, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected (refer to Note 9, in our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details). Resolution of this matter is not anticipated within the next year.

Goodwill and intangible assets
In accordance with ASC 350-10, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we evaluate goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or as other indicators of impairment emerge. The provisions of ASC 350-10 require that we perform a two-step impairment test. In the first step, we compare the implied fair value of our single reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of our reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount no impairment adjustment is required. If the carrying amount of our reporting unit exceeds the fair value, step two will be completed to measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any exists. If the carrying value of our single reporting unit's goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we record an impairment loss equal to the difference, but not in excess of the carrying amount of the goodwill. We evaluated

33

Table of Contents

goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter 2010, and concluded that no impairment existed as of December 31, 2010. Additionally, no impairment indicators have been identified during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 .

ASC 350-10 also requires that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 360-10, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets . We review long-lived assets, such as acquired intangibles and property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We measure recoverability of assets to be held and used by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, we recognize an impairment charge by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated.

 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2011
2010
2011
2010
 
 
 
 
 
Net revenues
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Cost of revenues
53.3

48.3

53.0

48.7

Gross profit
46.7

51.7

47.0

51.3

Operating expenses:
 
 


 
Research and development
13.8

12.5

13.2

11.5

Sales and marketing
10.6

10.2

10.5

9.7

General and administrative
8.2

8.9

8.1

8.5

Total operating expenses
32.6

31.6

31.8

29.7

Income from operations
14.1

20.1

15.3

21.6

Other income, net
0.7

0.6

0.6

0.6

Income before provision for income taxes
14.8

20.7

15.9

22.2

Provision for income taxes
4.8