UNITED STATES
FORM 10-K
| þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
OR
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES |
For the Transition period from to
Commission file number 1-08951
M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
(303) 773-1100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Delaware
84-0622967
(State or other jurisdiction
(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
3600 South Yosemite Street, Suite 900
80237
Denver, Colorado
(Zip code)
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Registranttelephone number, including area code)
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange/The Pacific Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K . o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). þ
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $1.495 billion. Computation is based on the closing sales price of $48.93 per share of such stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2004, the last business day of the Registrants most recently completed second quarter.
As of January 31, 2005, the number of shares outstanding of Registrants common stock was 43,328,000.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from the Registrants 2004 definitive proxy statement to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the Registrants fiscal year.
M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
_______________
Table of Contents
(i)
M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
FORM 10-K
PART I
Item 1. Business.
(a) General Development of Business
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. is a Delaware Corporation. We refer to M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. as the Company, MDC, we or our in this Form 10-K and these designations include our subsidiaries unless we state otherwise. Our primary business is owning and managing subsidiary companies that sell and build homes under the name Richmond American Homes. Our financial services segment consists of HomeAmerican Mortgage Corporation (HomeAmerican), which originates mortgage loans primarily for our homebuyers, and American Home Insurance Agency, Inc. (American Home Insurance), which offers third party insurance products to our homebuyers. In addition, we provide title agency services through American Home Title and Escrow Company (American Home Title) to our homebuyers in Virginia, Maryland, Colorado, Florida, Texas and Delaware.
The following is a summary of our history:
(b) Available Information
Our website is located at www.richmondamerican.com . This Form 10-K and all other reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can be accessed, free of charge, through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after the report is electronically filed with the SEC, at http://www.investorrelations.richmondamerican.com/edgar.cfm .
(c) Financial Information About Industry Segments
Note B to the consolidated financial statements contains information regarding our business segments for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
1
(d) Narrative Description of Business
Our business consists of two segments, homebuilding and financial services. In our homebuilding segment, our homebuilding subsidiaries build and sell primarily single-family detached homes, although we build some townhomes in Virginia and Maryland. Homes are designed and built to meet local customer preferences. We are the general contractor for all of our projects and retain subcontractors for site development and home construction. Our financial services segment consists of the operations of HomeAmerican and American Home Insurance. HomeAmerican is a full service mortgage lender with offices located in each of our markets and originates or brokers mortgage loans for approximately 75% of our homebuyers. As a result, HomeAmerican is an integral part of our business.
The base prices for our homes primarily range from $100,000 to $600,000, although we also build homes with base prices above $1,400,000. The average sales price of our homes closed in 2004 and 2003 was $283,400 and $254,300, respectively. We maintain a balanced product offering in each of our markets, focusing on high quality design and construction of homes in most price points, targeting the largest homebuyer segments within a given market, which generally is the first-time and first-time move-up buyer. As a result, more than 80% of our homebuyers fall into these two categories.
When opening a new homebuilding project, we generally acquire no more than a two-year supply of lots to avoid overexposure to any single sub-market. When we acquire finished lots, we prefer using option contracts or paying in phases with cash. We also acquire entitled land for development into finished lots when we determine that the risk is justified. Our Asset Management Committees, composed of members of MDCs senior management, generally meet weekly to review all proposed land acquisitions and takedowns of lots under option. Additional information about our land acquisition practices may be found in the Homebuilding Segment, Land Acquisition and Development section.
Homebuilding Segment.
General. MDC, whose subsidiaries build homes under the name Richmond American Homes, is one of the largest homebuilders in the United States. We provide mortgage financing, primarily for our homebuyers, through our wholly owned subsidiary HomeAmerican. We are a major regional homebuilder with a significant presence in some of the countrys best housing markets. We are the largest homebuilder in Colorado; among the top five homebuilders in Northern Virginia, suburban Maryland, Phoenix, Tucson, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City; and among the top ten homebuilders in Jacksonville, Northern California and Southern California. We also have established operating divisions in Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston, West Florida, Philadelphia/Delaware Valley and Chicago. We believe a significant presence in these markets enables us to compete effectively for homebuyers, land acquisitions and subcontractor labor.
Our operations are diversified geographically, as shown in the following table of home sales
revenues by state for the years 2002 through 2004 (dollars in thousands).
Total Home Sales Revenues
Percent of Total
2004
2003
2002
2004
2003
2002
$
627,331
$
547,697
$
370,367
16
%
19
%
16
%
1,078,063
748,337
645,700
27
%
26
%
29
%
614,919
675,236
731,211
16
%
24
%
32
%
81,635
15,655
2
%
1
%
994
0
%
161,561
112,975
84,913
4
%
4
%
4
%
676,252
383,659
227,319
17
%
13
%
10
%
109,432
26,143
177
3
%
1
%
0
%
113,579
48,331
16,936
3
%
2
%
1
%
468,247
293,295
183,668
12
%
10
%
8
%
$
3,932,013
$
2,851,328
$
2,260,291
100
%
100
%
100
%
The financial information required by Item 1 is contained in Note B to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Housing. We build homes in a number of basic series, each designed to appeal to a different segment of the homebuyer market. Within each series, we build several models, each with a different floor plan, elevation and standard
2
and optional features. Differences in sales prices of similar models in any series depend primarily upon location, optional features and design specifications. The series of homes offered at a particular location are based on customer preference, lot size, the areas demographics and, in certain cases, the requirements of major land sellers and local municipalities.
Design centers are located in most of our homebuilding markets. Homebuyers are able to customize certain features of their homes by selecting options and upgrades on display at the design centers. Homebuyers can select finishes and upgrades soon after they decide to purchase a Richmond American home. The design centers also provide us with an additional source of revenue and profit. We recently have launched our new Home Gallery concept in the Denver area. These Home Galleries offer thousands of options for customizing a new home, including flooring; countertops; lighting and plumbing fixtures; cabinetry; paint; appliances; home entertainment, security and technology wiring; closet solutions and central vacuum systems. The Home Gallery color studios enable homebuyers to view selections that have been coordinated into color schemes by design consultants. The individualized process is designed to make design and upgrade decisions simpler. Another advantage of the Home Gallery is the ease with which homebuyers can visit to browse the design and upgrade options available before their appointment with a design consultant.
We maintain limited levels of inventories of unsold homes in our markets. Unsold homes in various stages of completion allow us to meet the immediate and near-term demands of prospective homebuyers. In order to mitigate the risk of carrying excess inventory, we have strict controls and limits on the number of our unsold homes under construction.
Land Acquisition and Development. We purchase finished lots using option contracts, in phases or in bulk for cash. We also acquire entitled land for development into finished lots when we believe that the risk is justified. In making land purchases, we consider a number of factors, including projected rates of return, sales prices of the homes to be built, population and employment growth patterns, proximity to developed areas, estimated costs of development and demographic trends. Generally, we acquire finished lots and land for development only in areas that will have, among other things, available building permits, utilities and suitable zoning. We attempt to maintain a supply of finished lots sufficient to enable us to start homes promptly after a contract for a home sale is executed. This approach is intended to minimize our investment in inventories and reduce the risk of shortages of labor and building materials. Increases in the cost of finished lots may reduce Home Gross Margins (as defined below) in the future to the extent that market conditions would not allow us to recover the higher cost of land through higher sales prices. See Forward-Looking Statements below. We define Home Gross Margins to mean home sales revenues less cost of goods sold (which primarily includes land and construction costs, capitalized interest, a reserve for warranty expense and financing and closing costs) as a percent of home sales revenues.
We have the right to acquire a portion of the land we will acquire in the future utilizing option contracts, in some cases on a rolling basis. Generally, in an option contract, we obtain the right to purchase lots in consideration for an option deposit. In the event we elect not to purchase the lots within a specified period of time, we forfeit the option deposit. Our option contracts do not contain provisions requiring specific performance. This practice limits our risk and avoids a greater demand on our liquidity. At December 31, 2004, we had the right to acquire 21,164 lots under option agreements with approximately $41.8 million in non-refundable cash option deposits and $22.1 million in letters of credit at risk. Because of increased demand for finished lots in certain of our markets, our ability to acquire lots using rolling options has been reduced or has become significantly more expensive.
We own and have the right under option contracts to acquire undeveloped parcels of real estate that we intend to develop into finished lots. We develop our land in phases (generally fewer than 100 lots at a time for each home series in a subdivision) in order to limit our risk in a particular project and to efficiently employ available liquidity. Building permits and utilities are available and zoning is suitable for the current intended use of substantially all of our undeveloped land. When developed, these lots generally will be used in our homebuilding activities. See Forward-Looking Statements below.
3
The table below shows the carrying value of land and land under development, by state, as of
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands).
December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
168,489
$
89,950
$
92,639
277,360
239,714
154,980
139,554
105,223
140,930
27,926
12,116
33,656
69,523
53,483
21,892
209,544
129,554
114,142
28,916
19,420
16,420
5,559
35,104
22,548
12,984
100,461
94,561
113,717
$
1,109,953
$
763,569
$
656,843
The table below shows the number of lots owned and under option (excluding lots in housing
completed or under construction), by state, as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
December 31,
2004
2003
2002
5,657
2,902
3,356
2,646
2,733
2,473
3,993
3,392
4,733
594
346
508
650
532
228
3,916
3,634
3,254
312
642
534
170
862
867
730
980
1,411
2,018
20,760
16,351
16,962
5,494
2,356
584
1,782
779
983
1,866
1,814
1,027
2,980
529
203
1,206
1,235
1,223
1,859
1,725
1,137
723
1,694
1,669
671
216
353
131
3,141
1,791
1,239
21,164
12,251
6,995
Labor and Raw Materials . Generally, the materials used in our homebuilding operations are standard items carried by major suppliers. We generally contract for most of our materials and labor at a fixed price during the anticipated construction period of our homes. This allows us to mitigate the risks associated with increases in building materials and labor costs between the time construction begins on a home and the time it is closed. Increases in the cost of building materials, particularly lumber, and subcontracted labor may reduce Home Gross Margins to the extent that market conditions prevent the recovery of increased costs through higher sales prices. From time to time and to varying degrees, we may experience shortages in the availability of building materials and/or labor in each of our markets. These shortages and delays may result in delays in the delivery of homes under construction, reduced Home Gross Margins, or both. See Forward-Looking Statements below.
4
Warranty . Our homes are sold with limited warranties that generally provide for ten years of structural coverage (structural warranty), two years of coverage for plumbing, electrical and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, and one year of coverage for workmanship and materials (general warranty). Warranty reserves are initially established as homes close on a per-unit basis in an amount estimated to be adequate to cover expected costs of materials and outside labor during warranty periods. Reserves are determined based upon historical experience with respect to similar product types and geographical areas. Certain factors are given consideration in determining the per-house reserve amount, including: (1) the historical range of amounts paid per house; (2) the historical average amount paid per house; (3) any warranty expenditures included in (1) and (2) not considered to be normal and recurring; (4) improvements in quality control and construction techniques expected to impact future warranty expenditures; and (5) conditions that may affect certain projects and require higher per-house reserves for those specific projects.
Warranty expenditures are tracked on a house-by-house basis and are charged against the warranty reserve established for the house. Any expenditure incurred within 120 days of closing a home is recorded against the estimate to complete land development and home construction accrual, unless it is clear that the expenditure is a warranty claim. Expenditures incurred after 120 days of closing a home are considered warranty expenditures. Additional reserves are established for known unusual warranty-related expenditures not covered by the initial warranty reserves. If warranty expenditures for an individual house exceed the related reserve, then costs in excess of the reserve are evaluated in the aggregate to determine if an adjustment to housing cost of sales should be recorded.
Seasonal Nature of Business . Our homebuilding business is seasonal to the extent that certain of our operations, especially in the northernmost markets, are subject to weather-related slowdowns. Delays in development and construction activities resulting from adverse weather conditions could increase our risk of buyer cancellations and contribute to higher costs for interest, materials and labor. In addition, homebuyer preferences and demographics influence the seasonal nature of our business. See Forward-Looking Statements below.
Backlog.
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, homes under contract but not yet delivered
(Backlog) totaled 6,505 and 5,593, respectively, with estimated sales values of $1.92 billion and
$1.60 billion, respectively. Based on our past experience, assuming no significant change in market
conditions and mortgage interest rates, we anticipate that approximately 70% to 75% of our December
31, 2004 Backlog will close under existing sales contracts during the first nine months of 2005.
The remaining 25% to 30% of the homes in Backlog are not expected to close under existing contracts
due to cancellations. See
Forward-Looking Statements
below. The table below discloses, by market,
our Backlog for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands).
December 31,
2004 Increase (Decrease)
2004
2003
Amount
%
2,143
1,333
810
61
%
807
1,119
(312
)
-28
%
692
734
(42
)
-6
%
638
104
534
513
%
18
18
N/A
225
269
(44
)
-16
%
746
886
(140
)
-16
%
23
23
N/A
256
143
113
79
%
289
151
138
91
%
668
854
(186
)
-22
%
6,505
5,593
912
16
%
$
1,920,000
$
1,600,000
$
320,000
20
%
$
295.2
$
286.1
$
9.1
3
%
In 2004, we experienced strong demand for homes in Arizona, where our Backlog significantly increased year-over-year. Additionally, our Backlog increased in Florida, in part resulting from the acquisition of certain assets of Crawford Homes, Inc. in 2003 and of Watson Home Builders, Inc. in 2004. In 2004, we slowed the pace of new home offerings in certain communities in Virginia by releasing fewer homes to the market to allow construction to catch up with the Backlog in this market.
5
The 13% increase in orders for 2004 compared with 2003 was impacted by the extraordinary levels of demand experienced in Nevada and California during the first half of 2004. During the second half of 2004, we saw our overall level of net home orders decline to a level comparable to the same period in 2003. This decline was driven by Nevada and California, primarily due to a reduction in the number of net home orders per active community. Higher home order cancellations during the second half of 2004, compared with the same period in 2003, in both of these markets also contributed to the reduced number of net home orders. In addition, the net home orders received in California during the 2004 fourth quarter were impacted by a temporary reduction in the number of active communities, due in part to a higher than anticipated sales pace resulting from the exceptional demand for new homes in the state through the first half of 2004. Notwithstanding these changes in California and Nevada, we generally maintained the significant price increases realized in these markets earlier in the year.
Marketing and Sales . Our homes are sold under various commission arrangements by our own sales personnel and by cooperating brokers and referrals in the realtor community. In marketing our homes, we primarily use on-site model homes, advertisements in local newspapers, radio, billboards and other signage, magazines and illustrated brochures. We also market our homes on our internet website, www.richmondamerican.com , and utilize a variety of other internet sites to advertise our homes and communities.
Title Operations . American Home Title provides title agency services to our homebuyers in Virginia, Maryland, Colorado, Florida, Texas and Delaware. AHT Reinsurance, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MDC, reinsures existing title insurance policies issued to our homebuyers in California, Nevada and Utah. We are evaluating opportunities to provide title agency services in our other markets.
Competition . The homebuilding industry is fragmented and highly competitive. We compete with numerous homebuilders, including a number that are larger and have greater financial resources. Homebuilders compete for customers, desirable financing, land, building materials and subcontractor labor. Competition for home orders primarily is based upon price, style, financing provided to prospective purchasers, location of property, quality of homes built, customer service and general reputation in the community. We also compete with subdivision developers and land development companies when acquiring land.
Mortgage Interest Rates. Our homebuilding operations are dependent upon the availability and cost of mortgage financing. Increases in home mortgage interest rates may reduce the demand for homes and home mortgages and, generally, will reduce home mortgage refinancing activity, which could negatively impact our business. We are unable to predict future changes in home mortgage interest rates or the impact such changes may have on our operating activities and results of operations. See Forward-Looking Statements below.
Regulation . Our homebuilding operations are subject to continuing compliance requirements mandated by applicable federal, state and local statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, including zoning and land use ordinances, building codes, contractors licensing laws, state insurance laws, federal and state human resources laws and regulations and health and safety regulations and laws (including, but not limited to, those of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration). Various localities in which we operate have imposed (or may impose in the future) fees on developers to fund schools, road improvements and low and moderate-income housing. See Forward-Looking Statements below.
From time to time, various municipalities in which we operate restrict or place moratoriums on the availability of utilities, including water and sewer taps. Additionally, certain jurisdictions in which we operate have proposed or enacted growth initiatives that may restrict the number of building permits available in any given year. Although no assurances can be given as to future conditions or governmental actions, in general, we believe that we have, or can obtain, water and sewer taps and building permits for our land inventory and land held for development. See Forward-Looking Statements below.
Our homebuilding operations also are affected by environmental laws and regulations pertaining to availability of water, municipal sewage treatment capacity, land use, hazardous waste disposal, naturally occurring radioactive materials, building materials, population density and preservation of endangered species, natural terrain and vegetation. Due to these considerations, we generally obtain an environmental site assessment for parcels of land that we acquire. The particular environmental laws and regulations that apply to any given homebuilding project vary greatly according to the sites location, the sites environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site. These environmental laws and regulations may result in project delays, causing us to incur substantial compliance and other costs, and/or
6
prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding activity in certain environmentally sensitive regions or areas. See Forward-Looking Statements below.
Bonds and Letters of Credit. In many cases, we are required to obtain bonds and letters of credit in support of our related obligations with respect to subdivision improvement, homeowners association dues and start-up expenses, warranty work, contractors license fees, earnest money deposits, etc. At December 31, 2004, we had issued and outstanding performance bonds and letters of credit totaling $306.8 million and $94.7 million, respectively, including $25.6 million in letters of credit issued by HomeAmerican. In the event any such bonds or letters of credit issued by third parties are called, we would be obligated to reimburse the issuer of the bond or letter of credit. See Forward-Looking Statements below.
Financial Services Segment.
Mortgage Lending Operations.
General . HomeAmerican is a full-service mortgage lender and is the principal originator of mortgage loans for our homebuyers. Through office locations in each of our markets and a centralized loan origination center, HomeAmerican originates mortgage loans primarily for our homebuyers. HomeAmerican also brokers mortgage loans for origination by outside lending institutions for our homebuyers.
HomeAmerican is authorized to originate Federal Housing Administration-insured (FHA), Veterans Administration-guaranteed (VA), Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and other private investor mortgage loans. HomeAmerican also is an authorized loan servicer for FNMA, FHLMC and the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) and, as such, is subject to the rules and regulations of these organizations.
Substantially all of the mortgage loans originated by HomeAmerican are sold to investors within 45 days of origination. We use HomeAmericans secured warehouse line of credit, other borrowings and Company generated funds to finance these mortgage loans until they are sold.
Portfolio of Mortgage Loan Servicing . Mortgage loan servicing involves the collection of principal, interest, taxes and insurance premiums from the borrower and the remittance of such funds to the mortgage loan investor, local taxing authorities and insurance companies. The servicer is paid a fee to perform these services. HomeAmerican obtains the servicing rights related to the mortgage loans it originates. Certain mortgage loans are sold servicing released (the servicing rights are included with the sale of the corresponding mortgage loans). In 2004, 51% of the mortgage loans were sold servicing released. The servicing rights on the remainder of the mortgage loans generally are sold under minibulk contracts within two months of the sale of the mortgage loan. HomeAmerican intends to continue selling servicing rights on all mortgage loans originated in the future. See Forward-Looking Statements below.
HomeAmericans portfolio of mortgage loan servicing at December 31, 2004 consisted of servicing rights with respect to 2,906 single-family loans, 99% of which were less than one year old. This includes 2,330 single-family loans for which the servicing rights had been sold but not transferred to the purchasers as of December 31, 2004. HomeAmerican anticipates transferring these servicing rights in the first half of 2005. These loans are secured by mortgages on properties in eleven states, with interest rates on the loans ranging from approximately 4.25% to 6.00% and averaging 5.77%. The underlying value of a servicing portfolio generally is determined based on the interest rates and the annual servicing fee rates, gross of guarantee fees, currently .44% for FHA/VA loans and .25% for conventional loans applicable to the loans comprising the portfolio.
Pipeline. HomeAmericans mortgage loans in process that had not closed (the Pipeline) at December 31, 2004 had aggregate principal balances of $1.3 billion. An estimated 70% to 75% of the Pipeline at December 31, 2004 is anticipated to close during the first nine months of 2005. If mortgage interest rates decline, a smaller percentage of these loans would be expected to close. See Forward-Looking Statements below.
Forward Sales Commitments. HomeAmerican is exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on its mortgage loan inventory. Derivative instruments utilized in the normal course of business by HomeAmerican include forward sales securities commitments, private investor sales commitments and commitments to originate mortgage loans. HomeAmerican utilize the sales commitments to manage the price risk on fluctuations in interest rates on our mortgage loans owned and commitments to originate mortgage loans. Such contracts are the only significant
7
financial derivative instruments utilized by the Company and are generally settled within 45 days of origination. Due to this hedging philosophy, the market risk associated with HomeAmericans mortgages is limited.
Competition. The mortgage industry is fragmented and highly competitive. In each of the locations in which it originates loans, HomeAmerican competes with numerous banks, thrifts and other mortgage bankers, many of which are larger and have greater financial resources. Competitive factors include pricing, loan terms, underwriting criteria and customer service.
Insurance Operations.
American Home Insurance provides third party homeowners, auto and other types of casualty insurance to our homebuyers.
Employees.
At December 31, 2004, we employed approximately 3,600 employees. We consider our employee relations to be very good.
Item 2. Properties.
Our corporate headquarters currently is located at 3600 South Yosemite Street, Denver, Colorado 80237, where we lease office space in a 134,000 square foot office building. We have given notice of termination of our existing lease and have entered into a lease for new office space in the Denver area. We also lease office space at our homebuilding divisions and our financial services locations. All operations currently are either satisfied with the suitability and capacity of their properties or are in the process of locating additional space suitable for expanding operations.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various claims, complaints and other legal actions arising in the normal course of business, including moisture intrusion and related mold claims. In the opinion of management, the outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. See Forward-Looking Statements below.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) filed an administrative action against Richmond American Homes of Colorado, Inc. (Richmond), alleging that Richmond violated the terms of Colorados general permit for discharges of stormwater from construction activities at two of Richmonds development sites. In its complaint, the EPA sought civil penalties against Richmond in the amount of $122,000. On November 11, 2003, the EPA filed a motion to withdraw the administrative action so that it could refile the matter in United States District Court as part of a consolidated action against Richmond for alleged stormwater violations at not only the original two sites, but also two additional sites. The EPAs motion to withdraw was granted by the Administrative Law Judge on February 9, 2004. The EPA has not yet refiled the matter. The EPA recently has inspected a number of sites under development by Richmond affiliates in Virginia, Maryland, Arizona, California and again in Colorado, and claims to have found additional stormwater permit violations. Richmond has substantial defenses to the allegations made by the EPA and also is exploring methods of resolving this matter with the EPA.
Because of the nature of the homebuilding business, and in the ordinary course of its operations, the Company from time to time may be subject to product liability claims.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No meetings of the Companys stockholders were held during the fourth quarter of 2004.
8
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities.
On December 31, 2004, MDC had 954 shareowners of record. The shares of MDC common stock are
traded on the New York and the Pacific Stock Exchanges. The following table sets forth, for the
periods indicated, the price ranges of MDCs common stock. Amounts have been adjusted for
the effects of the 10% stock dividend distributed on March 23, 2004, as well as the 1.3 for 1 stock
split effective January 10, 2005.
The following table sets forth the cash dividends declared and paid in 2004 and 2003. Amounts
have been adjusted for the effects of the 10% stock dividend distributed on March 23, 2004, as well
as the 1.3 for 1 stock split effective January 10, 2005 (dollars in thousands, except per share
amounts).
On January 24, 2005, MDCs board of directors approved the payment of a cash dividend of 15.0
cents per share payable February 24, 2005 to shareowners of record on February 10, 2005.
On December 14, 2004, MDCs board of directors declared a 1.3 for 1 stock split, effected in
the form of a stock dividend that was distributed on January 10, 2005.
On February 23, 2004, MDCs board of directors declared a 10% stock dividend that was
distributed on March 23, 2004 to shareowners of record on March 8, 2004.
In connection with the declaration and payment of dividends, the Company is required to comply
with certain covenants contained in its unsecured revolving line of credit agreement which had a
capacity of $700 million as of December 31, 2004 and was amended and increased in January 2005 to
$1.058 billion. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, dividends may be declared or paid if the
Company is in compliance with certain stockholders equity and debt coverage tests. At December
31, 2004, the Company had a permitted dividend capacity of approximately $371 million pursuant to
the most restrictive of these covenants.
There were no shares repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2004.
The Company declared a 1.3 for 1 stock split effective January 10, 2005. As a result of this
stock split, the number of shares issuable under the Companys registration statements identified
below have been adjusted accordingly.
9
Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, the following registration statements on Form S-8 are deemed to cover the additional
number of shares of the Companys common stock as listed below, as a result of the adjustments to
account for such stock split:
10
Item 6.
Selected Financial and Other Data.
The data in this table should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements. Weighted-average shares and per share amounts have been adjusted for the effects of
the 10% stock dividend distributed on March 23, 2004 and the 1.3 for 1 stock split effective
January 10, 2005 (in thousands, except per share and unit amounts).
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
11
12
Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. is a Delaware Corporation. We refer to M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. as the
Company, MDC, we or our in this Form 10-K, and these designations include our subsidiaries
unless we state otherwise. Our primary business is owning and managing subsidiary companies that
build and sell homes under the name Richmond American Homes. Our financial services segment
consists of HomeAmerican Mortgage Corporation (HomeAmerican), which originates mortgage loans
primarily for our homebuyers, and American Home Insurance Agency, Inc. (American Home Insurance),
which offers third party insurance products to our homebuyers. In addition, we provide title agency
services through American Home Title and Escrow Company (American Home Title) to our homebuyers
in Virginia, Maryland, Colorado, Florida, Texas and Delaware.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
The economic climate for the homebuilding industry was excellent in 2004, and we were able to
capitalize on the fundamentals that drove the housing market, such as increasing consumer
confidence, improving job growth, low interest rates and a limited supply of land in high-demand
markets. We also were able to capitalize on the economies of scale that we experienced as a large,
well-capitalized homebuilder. Earnings per share increased by 79% to $8.79 in 2004. Our net
income of $391 million represents the 7th consecutive year for record earnings, and our total
revenues of $4 billion marks our 11th consecutive annual record. In addition, we achieved all-time
highs for home closings and Home Gross Margins, as defined below.
Strong demand for homes in most of our markets in 2004, particularly during the first half of
the year, led to our highest-ever level of annual orders for 14,248 homes. These strong orders
enabled us to end the year with a record Backlog, as defined below, of over 6,500 homes valued at
nearly $2 billion, representing a year-over-year value increase of 20%.
Our financial position continued to strengthen in 2004. Total stockholders equity at year-end
exceeded $1.4 billion, or $32.80 per outstanding share, and our yearend debt-to-capital ratio, net
of cash, was .19. Earlier in 2004, the term of our homebuilding line of credit was extended to five
years, and we increased our borrowing capacity to $700 million. Additionally in 2004, we expanded our shelf registration to $1 billion,
earmarking $500 million for our medium-term notes program. In December 2004, we issued $250
million of 10-year medium-term senior notes at a coupon rate of 5
3/8%. We ended the year with more than $1 billion in cash and borrowing capacity. In January 2005, we further
increased our borrowing capacity under our homebuilding line of
credit to $1.058 billion, with the ability to expand to $1.25 billion
with lender approval.
We declared a 10% stock dividend in February 2004 and, in January 2005, we completed a 1.3 for
1 stock split. As a result of these actions, we have effectively tripled our quarterly dividend
payment over the last 24 months. In addition, we repurchased 155,000 shares of stock in 2004,
adjusted for the 1.3 for 1 stock split, and we have 2,145,000 additional shares authorized for
repurchase.
We made significant progress in 2004 in furthering our expansion efforts in markets across the
country, evidenced by a 22% increase in our actively selling communities. We acquired control of
certain assets of Watson Home Builders, Inc. in Jacksonville and Patriot Homes and others in southern
New Jersey in the third quarter of 2004. These transactions significantly expanded our presence in
two of the countrys strongest housing markets. Also, in January 2005, we acquired the right to purchase
approximately 1,200 finished lots in the Central Valley of California from Del Valle Homes.
As a merchant homebuilder, we are focused on maximizing risk-adjusted returns. While we will
complete some level of development work on lots when the returns justify the risk, generally we
will not develop master-planned communities. We attempt to focus on the largest demand segments
within a given market, which generally is the first-time and first-time move-up buyer. As a result,
more than 80% of our homebuyers fall into these two categories.
Our objective is to achieve a major market share in each of our markets. The markets in which
we operate have been selected because of their potential for population and employment growth. We
attempt to establish homebuilding operations in the best markets in the country. When we enter a
market, our goal is to be one of the top builders in that market. We have accomplished this goal in
most of the markets we have operated in since the mid-1980s.
13
When opening a new homebuilding project, our land strategy generally is to acquire no more
than a 2
1
/
2
year supply of lots to avoid overexposure to any single sub-market. We prefer to acquire
finished lots using rolling options or in phases for cash. However, we will acquire entitled land
for development into finished lots when we determine that the risk is justified. Our Asset
Management Committees, composed of members of our senior management, generally meet weekly to
review all proposed land acquisitions and takedowns of lots under option. In evaluating land and
lot acquisition opportunities, our objective is to increase our land under option and reduce the
percentage of land owned.
Consolidated Results.
The following discussion for both consolidated results of operations and segment results
refers to the year ended December 31, 2004, compared with the same period in 2003, and the year
ended December 31, 2003, compared with the same period in 2002. The table below summarizes our
results of operations (in thousands, except per share amounts). Earnings per share for prior
periods have been restated to reflect the effect of the 10% stock dividend distributed on March 23,
2004 and the 1.3 for 1 stock split effective January 10, 2005.
2004
Compared With 2003
. The 37% growth in revenues primarily resulted from a 24% increase
in the number of homes closed to 13,876, as well as an increase of $29,100 in our average home
selling price.
Income before income taxes increased 83% in 2004. The increase primarily was due to an 83%
increase in homebuilding segment operating profit, partially offset by a 35% decrease in financial
services segment operating profit. The homebuilding segment profit increase principally was the
result of the increases in home closings and average selling prices described above and a 360 basis
point increase in Home Gross Margins. The financial services segment profit decrease primarily was
due to a 21% decrease in gains on sales of mortgage loans and a 19% increase in general and
administrative expenses resulting from HomeAmericans expanded loan origination activity. The
improvement in homebuilding operating profits more than offset a 36%
increase in total corporate expenses.
2003 Compared With 2002
. The 26% increase in revenues primarily resulted from a 26% increase
in the number of homes closed to 11,211.
Income before income taxes increased 27% in 2003. The increase primarily was due to a 33%
increase in homebuilding segment operating profit and a 17% increase in financial services segment
operating profit. The homebuilding segment profit increase principally was the result of the home
closing increases described above and a 110 basis point increase in Home Gross Margins. The
financial services segment profit increase primarily was due to a 46% increase in gains on sales of
mortgage loans and a 19% increase in loan origination fees, partially offset by higher general and
administrative expenses resulting from HomeAmericans expanded loan origination activity. These
improvements in homebuilding and financial services operating profits more than offset a 40%
increase in corporate general and administrative expenses and a $9.3 million charge for expenses
related to the redemption of our $175 million 8 3/8% senior notes due 2008.
14
Homebuilding Activities 2004 Compared With 2003 (dollars in thousands).
15
Home Sales Revenues and Homes Closed.
Home sales revenues in 2004 increased 38% over 2003.
The improvement resulted from a 24% increase in home closings, as well as an increase of $29,100 in our average home selling price.
Our home closings were higher in 2004, compared with 2003, in all of our markets except
Colorado. Home closings particularly were strong in Nevada, Arizona, California and Virginia,
primarily due to the strong demand for new homes in these markets
which resulted in a higher Backlog of homes to begin the year, as
compared with the start of the prior year. In addition, our recently
entered markets in Utah, Texas, Florida and Illinois contributed an increase of 1,231 home closings
in 2004. We closed fewer homes in 2004, compared with 2003, in Colorado, primarily due to lower
home orders resulting from fewer average active subdivisions in this market.
Average Selling Price Per Home Closed.
The average selling price per home closed increased by
$29,100 to $283,400 in 2004, compared with $254,300 in 2003. The
increase is partially attributable to
closing a greater number of homes in California and Virginia, where average home selling prices are
significantly above the Company average. We also closed significantly more homes in Nevada, where
our average selling price increased $60,900, or 33%, over 2003. These increases partially were
offset by the impact of higher home closings in Arizona, Utah, Texas and Florida, where average
selling prices were more than $90,000 lower than the Company average. The following table displays
our average selling price per home closed by market for the years indicated below (in thousands).
Home Gross Margins.
We define Home Gross Margins to mean home sales revenues less cost of
goods sold (which primarily includes land and construction costs, capitalized interest, a reserve
for warranty expense and financing and closing costs) as a percent of home sales revenues.
Home Gross Margins were 27.7% for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared with 24.1% in
2003. The increase in our Home Gross Margins primarily was due to
strong demand for homes and increased
selling prices in many of our markets, particularly in Nevada, California and Virginia. In
addition, we closed 33% more homes in Nevada, where we realized significantly higher Home Gross
Margins than the Company average. These Home Gross Margin increases partially were offset by the impact of
a greater number of homes closed in Florida, Utah and Texas in 2004, where Home Gross Margins were
lower than the Company average. We were able to minimize the impact of labor and material
16
cost increases by leveraging our national purchasing power, thus limiting the impact on Home Gross
Margins across the Company.
Future Home Gross Margins may be impacted by, among other things: (1) increased competition,
which could affect our ability to raise home prices and maintain lower levels of incentives; (2)
increases in the costs of subcontracted labor, finished lots, building materials (for example,
lumber and steel have significantly increased year-over-year), and other resources, to the extent
that market conditions prevent the recovery of increased costs through higher selling prices; (3)
adverse weather; (4) shortages of subcontractor labor, finished lots and other resources, which can result
in delays in the delivery of homes under construction and increases in related cost of sales; (5)
the impact of changes in demand for housing in Nevada, California and Arizona, and (6) other
general risk factors. See
Forward-Looking Statements
below.
Orders for Homes and Backlog
. Home orders during 2004 particularly were strong in Arizona,
despite having fewer actively selling communities than a year ago, aided by the continued strong
demand for new homes in this market. Also, we received a combined increase of 1,324 home orders in
2004 from our new markets in Utah, Texas, Florida, Illinois and Philadelphia/Delaware Valley.
Colorado home orders were lower for 2004, compared with 2003, primarily resulting from a reduction
in the number of our active Colorado subdivisions. In addition, we intentionally slowed the pace of
new home orders over the last year in Virginia, one of the countrys strongest markets for new
homes, to allow construction activities to catch-up with our Backlog of homes sold but not yet
started in this market.
The
13% increase in orders for 2004 compared with 2003 was impacted by
the extraordinary levels of demand experienced in Nevada and
California during the first half of 2004. During the second half of
2004, we saw our overall level of net home orders decline to a level comparable to the same period in 2003. This decline was driven by
Nevada and California, primarily due to a reduction in the number of
net home orders per active community. Higher home order cancellations
during the second half of 2004, compared with the same period in 2003, in both of these markets also contributed to the reduced number
of net home orders. In addition, the net home orders received in
California during the 2004 fourth quarter were impacted by a
temporary reduction in the number of active communities, due in part
to a higher than anticipated sales pace resulting from the
exceptional demand for new homes in the state through the first half
of 2004. Notwithstanding these changes in California and Nevada, we
generally maintained the significant price increases realized in
these markets earlier in the year.
We believe that both California and Nevada provide favorable environments for continued
strength in the demand for new homes for the foreseeable future, particularly in our locations and
price points, and we have allocated significant capital for growth in these markets in 2005. As a
result, we expect to have approximately twice as many active communities in Nevada by the end of
the 2005 first quarter as we had a year earlier. Additionally, in California, we plan to add as
many as ten active communities during the first quarter of 2005. Assuming no material changes in
market conditions and anticipation of continued increases in active communities in most of our
markets in 2005, we believe that our home order comparisons will improve as the 2005 year
progresses beyond the first quarter. See
Forward-Looking Statements
below.
Homes under contract but not yet delivered (Backlog) at December 31, 2004 increased 16% to
6,505 homes with an estimated sales value of $1.92 billion, compared with the Backlog of 5,593
homes with an estimated sales value of $1.60 billion at December 31, 2003. Assuming no significant
change in market conditions or mortgage interest rates, we expect approximately 70% to 75% of our
Backlog to close under existing sales contracts during the first nine months of 2005. The remaining
25% to 30% of the homes in Backlog are not expected to close under existing contracts due to
cancellations. See
Forward-Looking Statements
below.
Marketing
. Marketing expenses (which include sales commissions, advertising, amortization of
deferred marketing costs, model home expenses and other costs) totaled $198.5 million in 2004,
compared with $162.1 million in 2003. The increase in 2004 primarily was due to increases of (1)
$24.5 million in sales commissions resulting from our increased home sales revenues; (2) $7.7
million in product advertising and deferred marketing amortization in connection with the increased
number of active subdivisions and greater number of home closings in 2004; and (3) $3.7 million in
salaries and benefits attributable to our expanding homebuilding operations in new and existing
markets.
General and Administrative.
General and administrative expenses totaled $181.6 million in
2004, compared with $138.5 million in 2003. The increase in 2004 primarily was due to increased
compensation and other employee
17
benefit costs associated with the expanded operations in many of
our markets, most notably California, Colorado, Nevada and Virginia, and in our new markets in
Utah, Texas, Florida, Philadelphia/Delaware Valley and Illinois.
Homebuilding Activities 2003 Compared With 2002 (dollars in thousands).
18
Home Sales Revenues and Homes Closed.
Home sales revenues in 2003 increased 26% compared with
2002. The increase resulted from home closings which reached 11,211 for 2003, 26% higher than
2002.
Our home closings were higher in 2003, compared with 2002, in all of our markets except
Colorado. Home closings particularly were strong in Nevada and Arizona, primarily due to the strong
demand for new homes in these markets. In addition, the newly entered markets in Utah, Texas and
Florida contributed an increase of 429 home closings in 2003. We closed fewer homes in 2003,
compared with 2002, in Colorado, primarily due to lower home orders in this market, resulting from
fewer active subdivisions and the more challenging economic conditions experienced in this market.
Average Selling Price Per Home Closed.
The average selling price per home closed remained
relatively consistent at $254,300 in 2003, compared with $254,000 in 2002. Average selling prices
increased in Maryland, Virginia and Arizona, primarily resulting from the ability to increase sales
prices due to the strong demand for new homes in these markets throughout 2003. Also, a greater
number of homes were closed in relatively higher-priced subdivisions in the above noted markets, as
well as in Colorado and Utah. These increases partially were offset by the impact of increased home
closings in Nevada, Utah, Texas and Florida, where selling prices are lower than the Company
average. The following table displays our average selling price per home closed by market for the
years indicated below (in thousands).
Home Gross Margins.
Home Gross Margins were 24.1% for the year ended December 31, 2003,
compared with 23.0% in 2002. The increase in Home Gross Margins primarily was attributable to
increased demand and higher home selling prices in many of our markets, as well as the impact of
corporate initiatives directed at reducing construction costs. Additionally, insurance recoveries
relating to warranty expenses incurred in prior periods for water intrusion issues in Colorado and
reductions in previous estimates to complete land development and construction in certain markets
contributed to this increase. These Home Gross Margin increases partially were offset by the impact
of higher incentives in Colorado, as well as a greater number of homes closed in 2003 in Florida,
Utah and Texas, where Home Gross Margins were lower than the Company average.
Orders for Homes and Backlog
. Home orders during 2003 particularly were strong in Nevada and
Arizona, aided by the continued strong demand for new homes in these markets. Also, we received a
combined 725 home orders in 2003 from our new markets in Utah, Texas and Florida. Colorado home
orders were lower for 2003, compared with 2002, primarily resulting from the reduced number of
active subdivisions and the challenging economic environment
19
discussed above. We received net orders for 2,690 homes during the fourth quarter of 2003, 39%
higher than net orders for 1,931 homes for the same period in 2002.
Record home orders received during 2003 contributed to the 39% increase in Backlog at December
31, 2003 to 5,593 homes with an estimated sales value of $1.60 billion, compared with the Backlog
of 4,035 homes with an estimated sales value of $1.12 billion at December 31, 2002.
Marketing
. Marketing expenses totaled $162.1 million in 2003, compared with $125.1 million in
2002. The increase in 2003 primarily was due to (1) increased sales commissions resulting from our
increased home sales revenues; (2) higher product advertising and deferred marketing amortization
in connection with the increased number of active subdivisions and greater number of home closings
in 2003; (3) increased sales overhead resulting from our expanding home sales activities; and (4)
higher salaries and benefits attributable to our expanding homebuilding operations in new and
existing markets.
General and Administrative.
General and administrative expenses totaled $138.5 million in
2003, compared with $105.5 million in 2002. The increase in 2003 primarily was due to increased
compensation and other administrative costs associated with the expanded operations in many of our
markets, most notably Arizona, Nevada, California and Virginia, and in our new markets of Utah,
Texas, Florida, Philadelphia/Delaware Valley and Illinois.
Title Operations.
American Home Title provides title agency services to our homebuyers in Virginia, Maryland,
Colorado, Florida, Texas and Delaware. AHT Reinsurance, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MDC,
reinsures existing title insurance policies issued to our homebuyers in California, Nevada and
Utah. We are evaluating opportunities to provide title agency services in our other markets.
Income before income taxes from title operations totaled $5.0 million, $3.1 million and $2.4
million, respectively, in 2004, 2003 and 2002.
Land Sales.
Revenue from land sales totaled $8.9 million, $1.3 million and $6.0 million in 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively. The land sales in 2004 primarily were in Florida, Texas and Colorado. The land
sales in 2003 were in Virginia, Utah and Northern California. Land sales in 2002 primarily were in
Colorado and Utah. Gross profits from these sales were $0.1 million, $0.5 million and $1.4 million
in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Asset Impairment Charges.
No homebuilding asset impairment charges were recorded by the Company in 2004, 2003 or 2002.
New Homebuilding Operations.
In September 2003, we expanded our operations in the Florida homebuilding market by one of our
subsidiaries acquiring certain assets of Crawford Homes, Inc. in
Jacksonville, Florida and hiring approximately 40 of its former employees. The assets acquired included approximately 550 lots and
165 homes under construction in 15 subdivisions. In
September 2004, this same subsidary acquired certain assets of Watson Home Builders, Inc. in Jacksonville and hired approximately 55 of
its former employees. The assets acquired included control of approximately 2,000 lots and 330
homes under construction in 18 subdivisions. At December 31, 2004, we controlled more than 2,500
lots in this market. During 2004, this subsidiary received 446 home orders and closed 452 homes in
Jacksonville.
We expanded into the Houston and Philadelphia/Delaware Valley markets in the 2003 second
quarter and into the West Florida and Chicago markets in the third quarter of 2003. Each of these
expansion efforts was initiated by hiring a division president to manage start-up operations. In
September 2004, we expanded our Philadelphia/Delaware Valley operations by acquiring control of
approximately 600 residential lots from Patriot Homes, LLC, and others, in southern New Jersey. As
of December 31, 2004, we controlled 4,174 lots in all of these markets.
In January 2005, we expanded our
California operations by acquiring control of approximately 1,200 finished residential lots in the
Central Valley of California from Del Valle Homes.
20
Financial Services Activities 2004 Compared With 2003.
The
table below sets forth selected financial data relating to our
financial services operations (dollars in thousands).
The decline in operating profit in 2004 primarily was due to a reduction in gains on sales of
mortgage loans, as well as higher general and administrative expenses incurred to handle the
higher volume of mortgage loan closings and the record backlog level of the homebuilding segment.
The decline was driven by a more competitive mortgage pricing environment during 2004, the impact
of originating a greater number of less-valuable adjustable rate mortgage loans and brokering to third party mortgage companies a
higher percentage of total loans processed in 2004.
The principal amount of originated and brokered loans increased 12% and 79%, respectively, in
2004 compared with 2003. These improvements primarily were due to the increases in homes closed by
the homebuilding segment. Our homebuyers were the source of approximately 99% of the principal
amount of mortgage loans originated and brokered by HomeAmerican in 2004. The number of mortgage
loans originated by HomeAmerican for our homebuyers as a percentage of total MDC home closings is
defined as our Capture Rate. The declines in the Capture Rate primarily resulted from HomeAmerican
brokering out a higher percentage of mortgage loans to outside lending institutions for our
homebuyers due to the competitive environment for mortgage loans that resulted from the
significant decline in refinancing activity in the marketplace over the last year. Brokered loans,
for which HomeAmerican receives a fee, have been excluded from the computation of the Capture
Rate.
Forward Sales Commitments.
HomeAmericans operations are affected by changes in mortgage
interest rates. HomeAmerican utilizes forward mortgage securities contracts to manage price risk
related to fluctuations in interest rates on our fixed-rate mortgage loans held in inventory and
rate-locked mortgage loans in process that had not closed. Reported gains on sales of mortgage loans may vary
significantly from period to period depending on the volatility in the interest rate market.
Insurance Operations.
American Home Insurance provides third party homeowners, auto and other
types of casualty insurance to our homebuyers. The results of our insurance operations were not
material for any of the periods presented.
Financial Services Activities 2003 Compared With 2002.
The table below sets forth
selected financial data relating to our financial services operations (dollars
in thousands).
21
The increase in operating profit primarily was due to higher gains on sales of mortgage
loans, as well as higher origination fees received from record levels of mortgage loans originated
and brokered for our homebuyers. Revenues from mortgage loan origination fees in 2003, driven by
the record home closings from the homebuilding segment, partially were offset by higher general
and administrative expenses incurred to handle the higher volume of mortgage loans. Our
homebuyers were the source of approximately 99% of the principal amount of the mortgage loans
originated and brokered by HomeAmerican in 2003.
Mortgage loans originated by HomeAmerican for our homebuyers as a percentage of total MDC home
closings was 63% for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared with 71% for the same period in
2002. This decline in the Capture Rate primarily resulted from HomeAmerican brokering out a higher
percentage of mortgage loans to outside lending institutions for our homebuyers due to the
competitive pricing environment for mortgage loans that resulted from a significant decline in
refinancing activity in the marketplace toward the end of 2003.
Other Operating Results.
Interest Expense.
We capitalize interest on our homebuilding inventories during the period of
active development and through the completion of construction. Corporate and homebuilding interest
incurred but not capitalized is reflected as interest expense. All corporate and homebuilding
interest incurred in 2004, 2003 and 2002 was capitalized. Interest incurred by the financial
services segment is charged to interest expense, which is deducted from interest income and
reported as net interest income in Note B to our consolidated financial statements. Corporate and
homebuilding interest incurred increased to $32.9 million in 2004, compared with $26.8 million in
2003 and $21.1 million in 2002. The increase in 2004 compared with 2003 primarily was due to an
increase in the average debt balance, which was used to fund our long-term growth. For a
reconciliation of interest incurred, capitalized and expensed, see Note I to our consolidated
financial statements.
Expenses Related to Debt Redemption.
In May 2003, we redeemed $175.0 million principal amount
of our 8 3/8% senior notes due February 2008 (8 3/8%
Senior Notes). The 8 3/8% Senior Notes were redeemed
at 104.188% of their principal amount, or $182.3 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest through
the date of redemption. Expenses for 2003 related to this debt redemption of $9.3 million include
the above redemption premium of $7.3 million and the related unamortized discount and debt issuance
costs of $2.0 million. In compliance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 145, the expenses related to this debt
redemption are no longer treated as an extraordinary loss.
Corporate General and Administrative Expenses.
Corporate general and administrative expenses
totaled $101.6 million for 2004, compared with $65.4 million and $46.7 million, respectively, for
2003 and 2002. The increase in 2004 primarily was due to greater compensation-related costs
principally resulting from our higher profitability and expansion in all of our new and existing
markets. Additionally, we contributed $6.3 million in the form
of MDC common stock to the M.D.C.
Holdings, Inc. Charitable Foundation (the Foundation) in 2004, compared with $4.0 million in 2003 and
no contributions in 2002.
The Foundation is a nonprofit organization operated exclusively for charitable, educational
and other purposes beneficial to social welfare within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Certain directors and officers of the Company are the trustees and officers
of the Foundation. The Foundation takes action with respect to shares held by it, including the
voting of such shares, by majority vote of the five member board of trustees and, accordingly none
of the trustees should be considered to beneficially own such shares.
Income Taxes.
Our overall effective income tax rate of 38.6% for 2004, and 39.0% for both
2003 and 2002, differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the impact of state
income taxes.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We use our liquidity and capital resources to (1) support our operations, including our
homebuilding inventories; (2) provide working capital; and (3) provide mortgage loans for our
homebuyers. Liquidity and capital resources are generated internally from operations and from
external sources. During the 2004 third quarter, we filed a registration statement, which has been
declared effective, increasing our capacity to issue equity, debt or hybrid securities to $1
billion from $550 million. In December 2004, we issued $250 million principal amount of
5 3/8% medium-term senior notes, thereby reducing our capacity to issue equity, debt or hybrid
securities to $750 million.
22
Capital Resources.
Our capital structure is a combination of (1) permanent financing, represented by
stockholders equity; (2) long-term financing, represented by our publicly traded 7% senior notes
due 2012 (the 7% Senior Notes), 5 1/2% senior notes due
2013 (the 5 1/2% Senior Notes), 5 3/8%
medium-term senior notes due 2014 (the 5 3/8% Medium-Term Senior Notes) and our homebuilding line of
credit (the Homebuilding Line); and (3) current financing, primarily our mortgage lending line of
credit (the Mortgage Line). Based upon our current capital resources and additional capacity
available under existing credit agreements, we believe that our current financial condition is both
balanced to fit our current operating structure and adequate to satisfy our current and near-term
capital requirements, including the acquisition of land and expansion into new markets. We believe
that we can meet our long-term capital needs (including meeting future debt payments and
refinancing or paying off other long-term debt as it becomes due) from operations and external
financing sources, assuming that no significant adverse changes in our business or capital and
credit markets occur as a result of the various risk factors described elsewhere in this report.
See
Forward-Looking Statements
below.
Lines of Credit and Notes Payable.
Homebuilding.
Our Homebuilding Line is an unsecured revolving line of credit with a group of
lenders for support of our homebuilding operations. During April 2004, we renewed the Homebuilding
Line, increasing the aggregate commitment amount to $700 million and extending the maturity date to
April 7, 2009. In addition, the facilitys provision for letters of credit was increased to an
available aggregate amount of $350 million. At December 31, 2004, the facility permitted an
increase in the maximum commitment amount to $850 million upon our request, subject to receipt of
additional commitments from existing or additional participant lenders. In January 2005, the
facility was increased to $1.058 billion with the ability to increase the maximum commitment amount
to $1.25 billion with lender approval. At December 31,
2004, there were no borrowings outstanding and $67.0
million in letters of credit had been issued under the Homebuilding Line. We could have borrowed
funds at interest rates ranging from 2.5% to 5.25%.
Mortgage Lending.
Our Mortgage Line has a borrowing limit of $175 million with terms that
allow for increases of up to $50 million in the borrowing limit to a maximum of $225 million,
subject to concurrence by the participating banks. The terms of the Mortgage Line are set forth in
the Third Amended and Restated Warehousing Credit Agreement dated as of October 23, 2003, as
amended by the First Amendment dated as of February 27, 2004 and the Second Amendment dated as of
September 28, 2004. Available borrowings under the Mortgage Line are collateralized by mortgage
loans and mortgage-backed certificates and are limited to the value of eligible collateral as
defined. At December 31, 2004, $135.5 million was borrowed and an additional $23.9
million was collateralized and available to be borrowed. The Mortgage Line is cancelable upon 120
days notice. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the interest rates on our Mortgage Line were 3.4% and
2.3%, respectively.
General.
The agreements for our bank lines of credit and the indentures for our senior notes
require compliance with certain representations, warranties and covenants. We believe that we are
in compliance with these representations, warranties and covenants and we are not aware of any
covenant violations. The agreements containing these representations, warranties and covenants for
the bank lines of credit and the indentures for our senior notes are on file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and are listed in the Exhibit Table in Part IV of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The financial covenants contained in the Homebuilding Line credit agreement include a leverage
test and a consolidated tangible net worth test. Under the leverage test, generally, our
consolidated indebtedness is not permitted to exceed 55% (subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances) of the sum of consolidated indebtedness and our adjusted consolidated tangible net
worth, as defined. Under the consolidated tangible net worth test, our adjusted consolidated
tangible net worth, as defined, must not be less than the sum of (1) $776,018,000; (2) 50% of
consolidated net income, as defined, of the borrower, as defined, and the guarantors, as
defined, after December 31, 2003; and (3) 50% of the net proceeds or other consideration received
for the issuance of capital stock after December 31, 2003. Failure to satisfy the financial
covenant tests could result in a scheduled term-out of the facility. In addition, consolidated
tangible net worth, as defined, must not be less than the sum of (1) $485,011,000; (2) 50% of the
quarterly consolidated net income of borrower and the guarantors earned after December 31,
2003; and (3) 50% of the net proceeds or other consideration received for the issuance of capital
stock after
23
December 31, 2003. Failure to satisfy this covenant could result in a termination of the facility.
We believe that we are in full compliance with these covenants and are not aware of any covenant
violations.
Our senior notes are not secured and the senior notes indentures do not contain financial
covenants. Our senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis, jointly
and severally, by most of our homebuilding segment subsidiaries.
As of December 31, 2004, the maximum amount of additional homebuilding and corporate
indebtedness that we could have incurred under the most restrictive of the debt limitations
described above was approximately $900 million.
MDC Common Stock Repurchase Program.
In January 2005, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional
495,120 shares of MDC common stock, bringing the total authorization under our stock repurchase
program to 5,654,000 shares. We repurchased 155,000 shares of MDC common stock in 2004, adjusted
for the 1.3 for 1 stock split on January 10, 2005, bringing the total shares repurchased to
3,509,000 and leaving 2,145,000 shares available to be repurchased as of December 31, 2004 under
this program. The per share prices, including commissions, for the 155,000 shares repurchased
ranged from $43.17 to $44.42, with an average cost of $43.96, adjusted for the stock split. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, we held 31,000 and 4,007,000 shares of treasury stock with average
purchase prices of $43.97 and $12.56 per share, respectively, adjusted for the stock split.
Consolidated Cash Flow.
During
2004, we used cash of $23.9 million for our operating activities. The 2004 operating
cash use primarily was the result of a $38.9 million increase in our mortgage loans held in
inventory and a $527.1 million increase in our homebuilding inventories and other assets in
conjunction with our expanded homebuilding operations partially offset by income before deferred taxes, depreciation and amortization of $424.2 million and an increase in accounts payable and
other accrued expenses of $135.1 million. We continued to expand our homebuilding operations in new
markets to complement our expansion in existing markets through increased active subdivisions and
controlled lot inventory, thereby expending cash to acquire additional homebuilding assets.
Financing
activities generated cash of $288.4 million in 2004 primarily due to the issuance of
$250 million principal amount of 5 3/8%
Senior Notes and the net advancement on our lines of credit of $56.2 million. Additionally, we
repurchased 155,000 shares of MDC common stock for $6.8 million,
paid dividends of $18.6 million
and received $11.0 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock options.
We used $29.9 million in investing activities during 2004. These cash outlays primarily
related to purchases of property and equipment, including a corporate aircraft, computer equipment
and office furniture.
During 2003, we generated cash of $83.9 million from our operating activities. The 2003
operating cash flow primarily was generated by income before deferred taxes, depreciation and
amortization and debt redemption expenses of $251.1 million, an increase in accounts payable and
other accrued expenses of $77.6 million and a decrease in mortgage loans held in inventory of $67.9
million. These cash inflows partially were offset by increases in homebuilding inventories and other assets of
$310.3 million in conjunction with our expanded homebuilding operations.
Financing activities generated cash of $67.5 million in 2003. The 2003 cash provided by
financing activities primarily was due to the issuance of
$350 million principal amount of 5 1/2%
Senior Notes, partially offset by the redemption of the
$175 million 8 3/8% Senior Notes, including a
premium of $7.3 million on the redemption, and the net repayment of our lines of credit of $74.8
million. Additionally, we repurchased 1,040,000 shares of MDC common
stock for $26.7 million, paid dividends of
$11.8 million and received $17.0 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock
options.
During 2002, operating activities used cash of $166.4 million, primarily resulting from a
significant increase in homebuilding and mortgage lending inventories in conjunction with our
expanded homebuilding operations. Financing activities generated cash of $171.2 million in 2002,
primarily due to the issuance of $150 million principal amount of 7% Senior Notes, as well as an
increase in our Mortgage Line, partially offset by a use of $29.4 million in cash to repurchase MDC
common stock.
24
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.
At December 31, 2004, we had outstanding performance bonds of $306.8 million issued by third
parties to secure our performance under various contracts. We expect that the obligations secured
by these performance bonds generally will be performed in the ordinary course of business and in
accordance with the applicable contractual terms. To the extent that the obligations are performed,
the related performance bonds will be released and we will not have any continuing obligations.
In the normal course of business, MDC enters into lot option purchase contracts, generally
through a deposit of cash, for the right to purchase land or lots at a future point in time with
predetermined terms. Our liability with respect to option contracts generally is limited to
forfeiture of the related non-refundable cash deposits and letters of
credit, which totaled approximately $41.8 million and $22.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2004. At
December 31, 2004, we had the right to acquire 21,164 lots at an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.1 billion. Under FASBs Interpretation No. 46
(Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities) (FIN 46), certain of these contracts create a
variable interest, with the land seller being the variable interest entity (VIE). We have
evaluated, based on the provisions of FIN 46, all lot option purchase contracts outstanding as of
December 31, 2004. In connection with this evaluation, we requested financial information from
these VIEs, assessed the market conditions where we have contracted with these VIEs, and evaluated
whether we retain the risk of loss from the VIEs activities or are entitled to receive a majority
of the VIEs residual returns or both. Based on this evaluation, MDC has determined that its
interests in these VIEs do not result in significant variable interests or require consolidation as
our interests do not qualify it as the primary beneficiary of residual returns or losses.
We have made no material guarantees with respect to third-party obligations.
Contractual Obligations.
Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2004 are as follows (in thousands).
IMPACT OF INFLATION, CHANGING PRICES AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
Real estate and residential housing prices are affected by inflation, which can cause
increases in the price of land, raw materials and subcontracted labor. Unless these increased
costs are recovered through higher sales prices, Home Gross Margins would decrease. If interest
rates increase, construction and financing costs, as well as the cost
of borrowings, also could
increase, which can result in lower Home Gross Margins. Increases in home mortgage interest rates
make it more difficult for our customers to qualify for home mortgage loans, potentially decreasing
home sales revenue. Increases in interest rates also may affect adversely the volume of mortgage
loan originations.
The volatility of interest rates could have an adverse effect on our future operations and
liquidity. Reported gains on sales of mortgage loans may vary significantly from period to period
depending on the volatility in the interest rate market. Derivative instruments utilized in the
normal course of business by HomeAmerican include forward sales securities commitments, private
investor sales commitments and commitments to originate mortgage loans. We utilize these
commitments to manage the price risk on fluctuations in interest rates on our mortgage loans held
in inventory and
25
commitments to originate mortgage loans. Such contracts are the only significant financial
derivative instruments we utilize.
Among other things, an increase in interest rates may affect adversely the demand for housing
and the availability of mortgage financing and may reduce the credit facilities offered to us by
banks, investment bankers and mortgage bankers. See
Forward-Looking Statements
below.
Our business also is significantly affected by general economic conditions and, particularly,
the demand for new homes in the markets in which we build. The demand for new homes in Nevada
reached unprecedented levels during the last half of 2003 and the first six months of 2004. This
extraordinary demand, which has diminished in recent months, resulted in a substantial increase in
new home sales and median home prices. Our average home selling price in Nevada, along with our
Home Gross Margins, also increased significantly in 2004, compared with 2003, without a substantial
change in product mix.
We have increased our market share in Nevada to become the third-largest homebuilder in that
market, based on sales of single family detached homes, according to The Meyers Group. As a result,
we are well-positioned to continue to take advantage of the demand for new homes in Nevada.
Nevertheless, we have continued to follow our disciplined strategy of controlling approximately a
two-year supply of land in this market. Recently, we have experienced a decline in the rate of home
orders in Nevada, but market conditions generally have sustained the significant home price
increases realized earlier in 2004, and these conditions have continued to result in increased
prices in certain communities, albeit at a much slower rate. If demand for new homes in Nevada were
to continue to decline in the future, our financial results potentially could be impacted by the
recent significant appreciation in land costs, which could adversely affect our Home Gross Margins.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Management
bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Management evaluates such estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and makes
adjustments as deemed necessary. Actual results could differ from these estimates using different
estimates and assumptions, or if conditions are significantly different in the future. See
Forward-Looking Statements
below.
Listed below are those policies that we believe are critical and require the use of complex
judgment in their application. Our critical accounting policies are those related to (1)
homebuilding inventory valuation; (2) estimates to complete land development and home construction;
(3) warranty costs; and (4) litigation reserves.
Homebuilding Inventory Valuation.
Homebuilding inventories under development and construction
are carried at cost unless facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the
underlying projects may be impaired, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Impairment is determined by comparing the estimated
future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) from an individual project to its
carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the projects carrying value, the carrying value
of the project is written down to its estimated fair value, less cost
to sell. Homebuilding inventories held for sale are
carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less selling costs, and are evaluated on an individual
asset basis. Fair value is determined by management estimate and incorporates anticipated future
revenues and costs. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, it is at least reasonably
possible that actual results could differ from those estimates. We continue to evaluate the
carrying value of our inventory and, based on historical results, believe that our existing
estimation process is accurate and do not anticipate the process to materially change in the
future.
Estimates
to Complete Land Development and Home Construction.
When home sales revenue is
recognized upon home closing, an estimate
is made by the Company as to certain construction and land development costs incurred but not
yet paid at the time of closing. Estimated costs to complete a home are determined for each closed
home based upon historical data with respect to similar product types and geographical areas. We
monitor the accuracy of each monthly estimate by comparing actual costs incurred
subsequent to closing to the estimate made at the time of closing. We have made slight
modifications to the estimates based on these comparisons and will continue to monitor actual
results in the future. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, we had accruals of $35.4 million and $37.0
million, respectively. Historical estimates have been materially consistent with actual results. We do not expect
the estimates to materially change in the future, however actual results could differ from such estimates.
26
Warranty Costs.
The Companys homes are sold with limited warranties that generally provide
for ten years of structural coverage (structural warranty), two years of coverage for plumbing,
electrical and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, and one year of coverage for
workmanship and materials (general warranty). Warranty reserves are initially established as homes close
on a per-unit basis in an amount estimated to be adequate to cover expected costs of materials and
outside labor during warranty periods. Reserves are determined based upon historical experience
with respect to similar product types and geographical areas. Certain factors are given
consideration in determining the per-house reserve amount, including (1) the historical range of
amounts paid per house; (2) the historical average amount paid per house; (3) any warranty
expenditures included in (1) and (2) not considered to be normal and recurring; (4) improvements in
quality control and construction techniques expected to impact future warranty expenditures; and
(5) conditions that may affect certain projects and require higher per-house reserves for those
specific projects.
Warranty expenditures are tracked on a house-by-house basis and are charged against the
warranty reserve established for the house. Any expenditures incurred within 120 days of closing a
home are recorded against the estimate to complete land development and home construction accrual discussed above,
unless it is clear that the expenditure is a warranty claim. Expenditures incurred after
120 days of closing a home are considered warranty expenditures. Additional reserves are
established for known unusual warranty-related expenditures not covered by the initial warranty
reserves. If warranty expenditures for an individual house exceed the
related reserve, then costs in excess of the reserve are evaluated in the aggregate to determine if
an adjustment to housing cost of sales should be recorded.
Warranty reserves are reviewed quarterly, using historical data and other relevant
information, to determine the reasonableness and adequacy of both the reserve and the per unit
reserve amount initially included in cost of sales, as well as the timing of the reversal of the
reserve. Warranty reserves are included in corporate and homebuilding accounts payable and accrued
expenses in the consolidated balance sheets and totaled $64.4 million and $51.1 million,
respectively, at December 31, 2004 and 2003. Reserves carried over from prior years primarily are
the result of the Companys volume of homes closed increasing by over 200% in the last ten years,
giving rise to continuing warranty reserves that exceed current
expenditures. In addition, the carryover reserve includes additional
warranty reserves created pursuant to the qualified settlement fund. Due to uncertainties
in the estimation process, it is at least reasonably possible that actual results could differ from
those estimates. We continue to evaluate warranty reserves and, based on historical results,
believe that our existing estimation process is accurate and do not anticipate the process to
materially change in the future.
Litigation Reserves.
MDC and certain of our subsidiaries have been named as defendants in
various cases arising in the normal course of business. We have accrued for costs to be incurred
with respect to these cases based upon information provided by its legal counsel. Due to
uncertainties in the estimation process, it is at least reasonably possible that actual results
could differ from those estimates. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, we had accruals of $8.2 million
and $10.1 million, respectively. Historical estimates have been materially consistent with actual results. We do not
expect the estimates to materially change in the future, however due to uncertainties in the estimation process actual results could
differ from such estimates.
ISSUANCE OF STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R)), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(
SFAS 123
). SFAS 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees
, and amends SFAS Statement No. 95,
Statement of Cash Flows
. Generally, the approach in
Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123(R) requires
all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized
in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an
alternative.
SFAS 123(R) must be adopted no later than July 1, 2005. SFAS 123(R) permits public companies
to adopt its requirements using one of two methods:
27
We expect to adopt SFAS 123(R) on July 1, 2005, and we currently are evaluating adoption
alternatives.
As permitted by SFAS 123, we currently account for share-based payments to employees using APB
Opinion No. 25s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognizes no compensation cost for
employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS 123(R)s fair value method will have a
significant impact on our results of operations, although it will have no impact on our overall
financial position. The impact of adoption of SFAS 123(R) in future
periods will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had we adopted
SFAS 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of
SFAS 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and
earnings per share as disclosed
in Note A under Stock-Based Compensation to our consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost
to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under
current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net
financing cash flows in periods after adoption.
The amount of operating cash flows recognized in prior periods for the benefit of tax
deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost were $10.5 million, $7.2 million and $0 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
OTHER
Forward-Looking Statements.
Certain statements in this Form 10-K Annual Report, the Companys Annual Report to
Shareowners, as well as statements made by us in periodic press releases, oral statements made by
our officials to analysts and shareowners in the course of presentations about the Company and
conference calls following quarterly earnings releases, constitute forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We have identified the
forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K by cross-referencing this section at the end of the
paragraph in which the forward-looking statement is located. Such forward-looking statements
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results,
performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors
include, among other things, those listed below:
28
We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise. However, any further disclosures made on related
subjects in subsequent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K should be consulted.
29
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on mortgage loans
held in inventory and debt. Derivative instruments utilized in the normal course of business by
HomeAmerican include forward sales securities commitments, private investor sales commitments and
commitments to originate mortgage loans. We utilize these commitments to manage the price risk on
fluctuations in interest rates on our mortgage loans owned and commitments to originate mortgage
loans. Such contracts are the only significant financial derivative instruments utilized by MDC.
HomeAmerican provides mortgage loans that generally are sold forward and subsequently
delivered to a third-party purchaser within approximately 45 days. Forward commitments are used for
non-trading purposes to sell mortgage loans and hedge price risk due to fluctuations in interest
rates on rate-locked mortgage loans in process that have not closed. Due to this hedging
philosophy, the market risk associated with these mortgages is limited.
We utilize both short-term and long-term debt in our financing strategy. For fixed rate debt,
changes in interest rates generally affect the fair value of the debt instrument, but not our
earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for variable rate debt, changes in interest rates generally do
not impact the fair value of the debt instrument, but may affect our future earnings and cash
flows. We do not have an obligation to prepay fixed rate debt prior to maturity and, as a result,
interest rate risk and changes in fair value should not have a significant impact on the fixed rate
debt until we would be required to refinance such debt.
As of December 31, 2004, short-term debt was $135.5 million, which consisted of amounts
outstanding on our Mortgage Line. The Mortgage Line is collateralized by mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed certificates and are limited to the value of eligible collateral as defined. We
borrow on a short-term basis from banks under committed lines of credit, which bear interest at the
prevailing market rates. Long-term debt obligations outstanding, their maturities and estimated
fair value at December 31, 2004 are as follows (in thousands).
We believe that our overall balance sheet structure has repricing and cash flow
characteristics that mitigate the impact of interest rate changes.
30
Item 8.
Consolidated Financial Statements.
M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries at December
31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with United States generally
accepted accounting principles.
We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on
criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated February 15, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Denver, Colorado
F-2
M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information (in thousands)
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
A. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of M.D.C.
Holdings, Inc. (MDC or the Company, which, unless otherwise indicated, refers to M.D.C.
Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries) include the accounts of MDC and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Description of Business
The Company has determined that its reportable segments are
those that are based on its method of internal reporting, which disaggregates its business by
product category. MDCs products come from two segments, homebuilding and financial services. In
its homebuilding segment, through separate subsidiaries, the Company is engaged in the design,
construction and sale of single-family homes, as well as provides title agency services through its
wholly owned subsidiary American Home Title and Escrow Company. In the Companys financial services
segment, HomeAmerican Mortgage Corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.,
HomeAmerican) provides mortgage loans primarily to the Companys homebuyers (the mortgage lending
operations). The Company also makes available to its homebuyers third party homeowners, auto and
other types of insurance products through its wholly owned subsidiary American Home Insurance
Agency, Inc.
Presentation
The Companys balance sheet presentation is unclassified due to the
fact that certain assets and liabilities have both short and long-term characteristics.
Homebuilding.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Net
Homebuilding prepaid expenses and other
assets include qualified settlement fund (QSF) assets that are held for the processing and
disposition of eligible claims made under the warranties created pursuant to the settlement of
litigation commenced in 1994 and settled in November 1996. Available for sale investments included
in QSF assets are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, which is based on
quoted prices, with the related unrealized gain or loss included in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss). At December 31, 2004, MDC had intercompany notes payable (including accrued
interest) to the QSF, and the QSF had offsetting intercompany notes receivable from MDC, of $12.5
million, under a borrowing arrangement that was approved by the Colorado Division of Insurance.
The following table sets forth the information relating to homebuilding prepaid expenses and
other assets, net (in thousands).
Deferred Marketing Costs
Certain marketing costs related to model homes and sales
offices are capitalized as prepaid assets and amortized to selling, general and administrative
expenses as the homes in the related subdivision are closed. All other marketing costs are expensed
as incurred.
F-8
Intangible
Assets
The Companys intangible assets primarily consist of architectural
plans and third-party developer, subcontractor and customer relationships. Intangible amortization
expense was $2.0 million in 2004 and $0.2 million in 2003. No amortization expense was recorded in
2002. The estimated future aggregate amortization expense for existing intangible assets as of
December 31, 2004 is $3.2 million in 2005, $3.2 million in 2006 and $2.3 million in 2007.
The Company evaluates
the carrying value of these intangible assets in accordance with SFAS
No. 144. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment on an annual basis and whenever events
indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment is determined by comparing
the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) from an individual
asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the assets carrying value, the
carrying value of the asset is written down to its fair value. As of December 31, 2004, the Company
did not have any impairments.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from real estate sales are recognized in accordance
with SFAS No. 66 Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. The
Company records revenue at closing when a sufficient down payment has been received, financing has
been arranged, and title, possession and other attributes of ownership have been transferred to the
buyer and the Company is not obligated to perform significant additional activities after sale and
delivery.
Warranty Costs
The Companys homes are sold with limited warranties that generally
provide for ten years of structural coverage (structural warranty), two years of coverage for
plumbing, electrical and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, and one year of
coverage for workmanship and materials (general warranty). Warranty reserves are initially established as
homes close on a per-unit basis in an amount estimated to be adequate to cover expected costs of
materials and outside labor during warranty periods. Reserves are determined based upon historical
experience with respect to similar product types and geographical areas. Certain factors are given
consideration in determining the per-house reserve amount, including (1) the historical range of
amounts paid per house; (2) the historical average amount paid per
house; (3) any warranty
expenditures included in (1) and (2) not considered to be
normal and recurring; (4) improvements in
quality control and construction techniques expected to impact future
warranty expenditures; and (5)
conditions that may affect certain projects and require higher per-house reserves for those
specific projects.
Warranty expenditures are
tracked on a house-by-house basis and are charged against the
warranty reserve established for the house. Any expenditures incurred within 120 days of closing a
home are recorded against the estimate to complete land development and home construction accrual discussed below,
unless it is clear that the expenditure is a warranty claim. Expenditures incurred after
120 days of closing a home are considered warranty expenditures. Additional reserves are established for known unusual warranty-related expenditures not
covered by the initial warranty reserves. If warranty
expenditures for an individual house exceed the related reserve, then costs in excess of the
reserve are evaluated in the aggregate to determine if an adjustment to housing cost
of sales should be recorded.
Warranty reserves are reviewed quarterly, using historical data and other relevant
information, to determine the reasonableness and adequacy of both the reserve and the per unit
reserve amount initially included in cost of sales, as well as the timing of the reversal of the
reserve. Warranty reserves are included in corporate and homebuilding accounts payable and accrued
expenses in the consolidated balance sheets and totaled $64.4 million and $51.1 million,
respectively, at December 31, 2004 and 2003. The Companys volume of homes closed has increased by
over 200% in the last ten years, giving rise to warranty reserves that exceed current expenditures.
In addition, the carryover reserve includes additional warranty reserves created pursuant to the
QSF.
F-9
The following table summarizes the warranty activity for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002 (in thousands).
Homebuilding
Inventory Valuation
Homebuilding inventories under development and
construction are carried at cost unless facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of
the underlying projects may be impaired, in accordance with SFAS No. 144. Impairment is determined
by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) from an
individual project to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the projects carrying
value, the carrying value of the project is written down to its estimated fair value, less cost to sell. Homebuilding
inventories held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less selling costs, and
are evaluated on an individual asset basis. Fair value is determined by management estimate and
incorporates anticipated future revenues and costs. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process,
it is at least reasonably possible that actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company
continues to evaluate the carrying value of our inventory and, based on
historical results, believes that the existing estimation process is accurate and does not
anticipate the process to materially change in the future.
Estimates to Complete Land Development and Home Construction
When home sales revenue is
recognized upon home closing, an estimate
is made by the Company as to certain construction and land development costs incurred but not
yet paid at the time of closing. Estimated costs to complete a home are determined for each closed
home based upon historical data with respect to similar product types and geographical areas. The
Company monitors the accuracy of each monthly estimate by comparing actual costs incurred
subsequent to closing to the estimate made at the time of closing. The Company has made slight
modifications to the estimates based on these comparisons and will continue to monitor actual
results in the future. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had accruals of $35.4 million and
$37.0 million, respectively. Historical estimates have been materially consistent with actual results.
The Company does not expect the estimates to materially
change in the future, however actual results could differ from such estimates.
Variable interest entities
In the normal course of business, MDC enters into lot option purchase contracts, generally through a deposit of cash, for the right
to purchase land or lots at a future point in time with predetermined terms. The Companys liability with respect to option contracts generally is limited to
forfeiture of the related non-refundable cash deposits and letters of credit, which totaled approximately
$41.8 million and $22.1 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2004, the Company had
the right to acquire 21,164 lots at an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $1.1 billion. Under FASBs Interpretation No. 46
(Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities) (FIN 46), certain of these contracts create a variable interest, with the land
seller being the variable interest entity (VIE). The Company has evaluated, based on the provisions of FIN 46, all lot option purchase contracts outstanding
as of December 31, 2004. In connection with this evaluation, the
Company requested financial information from these VIEs, assessed the market conditions where the Company has contracted with these VIEs, and evaluated whether the Company retains the risk
of loss from the VIEs activities or are entitled to receive a majority of the VIEs residual returns or both.
Based on this evaluation, MDC has determined that its interests in these VIEs do not result in significant variable interests or
require consolidation as MDCs interests do not qualify it as the primary beneficiary of residual returns or losses.
Financial Services.
Mortgage Loans Held in Inventory
The Company generally purchases forward commitments
to deliver mortgage loans held for sale. Mortgage loans held in inventory are stated at the lower
of aggregate cost or fair value based upon such commitments for loans to be delivered or prevailing
market for uncommitted loans. Substantially all of the loans originated by the Company are sold to
investors within 45 days of origination. Gains or losses on mortgage loans held in inventory are
realized when the loans are sold. Credit losses related to mortgage loans in inventory have been insignificant.
F-10
Revenue Recognition
Loan origination fees, net of certain direct loan origination
costs incurred, and loan commitment fees are deferred until the related loans are sold. Loan
servicing fees are recorded as revenue when the mortgage loan payments are received. Revenues from
the sale of mortgage loan servicing are recognized when title and all risks and rewards of
ownership have irrevocably passed to the buyer and there are no significant unresolved
contingencies.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) SFAS
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No.
138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities and SFAS No.
149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No.
133), requires companies to recognize all of their derivative instruments as either assets or
liabilities in the balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value
(i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been properly
designated by a company as a hedging relationship and is determined to qualify for hedge
accounting. To qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, at the inception of a hedge, a
company must formally document the relationship between the derivative instrument and the hedged
item, as well as the risk management objective, the strategy for undertaking the hedge
transactions, and the method the company will use to assess the hedges effectiveness in achieving
offsetting changes in fair value. In addition, the company must document the results of the method
used to assess hedge effectiveness on an ongoing basis.
If a company either does not properly designate the hedging relationship or subsequently
determines that the derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting, the derivative
instruments are considered free standing derivatives. Free standing derivatives are
marked-to-market and included in the balance sheet as either derivative assets or liabilities with
corresponding changes in fair value recorded in income as they occur.
The Company utilizes certain derivative instruments in the normal course of operations. These
instruments include forward sales of mortgage-backed securities commitments, private investor sales
commitments and commitments to originate mortgage loans (interest rate lock commitments or locked
pipeline), all of which typically are short-term in nature. Forward sales securities commitments
and private investor sales commitments are utilized to hedge changes in fair value of mortgage loan
inventory and commitments to originate mortgage loans.
For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company determined that its derivative instruments
qualified for SFAS No. 133 hedge accounting as fair value hedges and the resulting adjustments
related to this qualification were immaterial to the Companys financial position and results of
operations. Additionally, the Company marked-to-market its mortgage loan inventory in accordance
with SFAS No. 133. During 2004 and 2003, the Company did not designate its derivatives as hedging
instruments and recorded its forward sales commitments and its locked pipeline as free standing
derivatives and applied the lower-of-cost-or-market method to account for mortgage loan inventory
in accordance with SFAS No. 65, Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities. The effect of
not designating the derivatives as hedging instruments did not impact materially the Companys
results of operations for 2004 and 2003.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Company allocates the cost of mortgage loans
originated between the mortgage loans and the right to service those mortgage loans, based on
relative fair value, on the date the loan is sold. Mortgage servicing rights (Servicing Rights)
of $8.9 million and $11.6 million were capitalized during 2004 and 2003, respectively. Servicing
Rights are amortized over the estimated period of net servicing revenues. The cost attributed to
the Servicing Rights sold and the amortization of Servicing Rights was $8.9 million and $11.7
million for 2004 and 2003, respectively. Servicing Rights are evaluated for impairment by
stratifying the portfolio based on loan type and interest rate. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
the Company had unamortized Servicing Rights of $0.1 million
with no related impairment as of both periods ended, included in financial services other assets, net in the consolidated balance sheets.
F-11
General.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company periodically invests funds not immediately
required for operating purposes in highly liquid, short-term investments with an original maturity
of 90 days or less, such as
commercial paper, money market funds and repurchase agreements, which are included in cash and cash
equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of cash flows.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from two to 15 years.
Depreciation expense was $8.0 million, $5.1 million and $3.5 million for the years ended December
31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Accumulated depreciation as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
was $22.0 million and $15.6 million, respectively.
Advertising Costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising
expense was $26.4 million, $23.6 million and $20.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company grants options to certain employees and
directors to acquire a fixed number of shares with an exercise price not less than the fair market
value of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. The Company also makes restricted stock
grants to employees, which are valued based on the market price of MDCs common stock at the grant
dates and vest over four years. Unearned compensation arising from the restricted stock grants is
shown as a reduction in stockholders equity in the consolidated balance sheets and is amortized to
expense over the vesting period. The expense recognized in the consolidated income statement for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $0.5 million, $0.5 million and $0.2 million,
respectively.
The Company has elected to account for stock options using the intrinsic value method as
prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25 and related interpretations and,
has recorded no compensation expense in the determination of net income in the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and
earnings per share if the fair value method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards
in each of the following years (in thousands, except per share amounts).
The following table is a summary of the average fair values of options granted during 2004,
2003 and 2002 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
assumptions used for the expected volatility, risk free interest rate and dividend yield rate.
F-12
Other Comprehensive Income
The accumulated balances related to each component of
other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in thousands).
Estimates in Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such
estimates include warranty, other accrued expenses, litigation reserves, estimates to complete land
development and construction and estimates related to potential asset impairment charges.
Litigation Reserves
MDC and certain of our subsidiaries have been named as
defendants in various cases arising in the normal course of business.
The Company has accrued for
costs to be incurred with respect to these cases based upon information provided by its legal
counsel. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, it is at least reasonably possible that
actual results could differ from those estimates. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had
accruals of $8.2 million and $10.1 million, respectively.
Historical estimates have been materially consistent with actual
results. We do not expect the estimates to materially change in the
future, however due to uncertainties in the estimation process actual
results could differ from such estimates.
Recent Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
On December 16, 2004, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R)), which is a revision of
SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation
(
SFAS 123
). SFAS 123(R) supersedes APB
Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees
, and amends SFAS Statement No. 95,
Statement of Cash Flows
. Generally, the approach in Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach
described in SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their
fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.
SFAS 123(R) must be adopted no later than July 1, 2005. SFAS 123(R) permits public companies
to adopt its requirements using one of two methods:
The
Company expects to adopt SFAS 123(R) on July 1, 2005 and is
currently evaluating adoption alternatives.
As permitted by SFAS 123, the Company currently accounts for share-based payments to employees
using Opinion 25s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognizes no compensation cost
for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS 123(R)s fair value method will have
a significant impact on the Companys results of operations, although it will have no impact on the
Companys overall financial position. The impact of adoption of
SFAS 123(R) in future periods will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However,
had the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have
approximated the impact of SFAS 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net
F-13
income and earnings per share
as disclosed above in this Note A under Stock-Based Compensation to
the Companys consolidated financial statements. SFAS 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax
deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow,
rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will
reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows
in periods after adoption. The amount of operating cash flows
recognized in prior periods for the benefit of tax deductions in
excess of recognized compensation cost were $10.5 million, $7.2 million and $0
in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
B. Information on Business Segments
The Company operates in two business segments homebuilding and financial services. A
summary of the Companys business segments is shown below (in thousands).
Corporate general and administrative expenses consist principally of salaries and other
administrative expenses that are not identifiable to a specific segment. Transfers between
segments are recorded at cost. Capital expenditures and related depreciation and amortization for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were not material. Identifiable segment assets
are shown on the face of the consolidated balance sheets.
F-14
C. Mortgage Loans Held in Inventory
The following table sets forth the information relating to mortgage loans held in inventory
(in thousands).
Mortgage loans held in inventory consist primarily of loans collateralized by first mortgages
and deeds of trust due over periods of up to 30 years. The weighted-average effective yield on
mortgage loans held in inventory was approximately 5.7% and 5.9% at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
D. Lines of Credit
Homebuilding
The Companys homebuilding line of credit (Homebuilding Line) is an
unsecured revolving line of credit with a group of lenders for support of our homebuilding
operations. During April 2004, the Company renewed the Homebuilding Line, increasing the aggregate
commitment amount to $700 million and extending the maturity date to April 7, 2009. In addition,
the facilitys provision for letters of credit was increased to an available aggregate amount of
$350 million. The facility permitted an increase in the maximum commitment amount to $850 million
upon the Companys request, subject to receipt of additional commitments from existing or
additional participant lenders. At December 31, 2004, there were
no borrowings outstanding and $67.0 million in
letters of credit had been issued under the Homebuilding Line. The Company could have borrowed
funds at interest rates ranging from 2.5% to 5.25%.
Mortgage Lending
The Companys mortgage line of credit (Mortgage Line) has a
borrowing limit of $175 million with terms that allow for increases of up to $50 million in the
borrowing limit to a maximum of $225 million, subject to concurrence by the participating banks.
The terms of the Mortgage Line are set forth in the Third Amended and Restated Warehousing Credit
Agreement dated as of October 23, 2003, as amended by the First Amendment dated as of February 27,
2004 and the Second Amendment dated as of September 28, 2004. Available borrowings under the
Mortgage Line are collateralized by mortgage loans and mortgage-backed certificates and are limited
to the value of eligible collateral as defined. At December 31, 2004, $135.5 million was
borrowed and an additional $23.9 million was collateralized and available to be borrowed. The
Mortgage Line is cancelable upon 120 days notice. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the interest rates
on the Mortgage Line were 3.4% and 2.3%, respectively.
General
The agreements for the Companys bank lines of credit and the indentures for
the Companys senior notes require compliance with certain representations, warranties and
covenants. The Company believes that it is in compliance with these representations, warranties
and covenants and the Company is not aware of any covenant violations. The agreements containing
these representations, warranties and covenants for the bank lines of credit and the indentures for
the Companys senior notes are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are listed
in the Exhibit Table in Part IV of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The financial covenants contained in the Homebuilding Line credit agreement include a leverage
test and a consolidated tangible net worth test. Under the leverage test, generally, the Companys
consolidated indebtedness is not permitted to exceed 55% (subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances) of the sum of consolidated indebtedness and the Companys adjusted consolidated
tangible net worth, as defined. Under the consolidated
F-15
tangible net worth test, the Companys adjusted consolidated tangible net worth, as defined, must
not be less than the sum of (1) $776,018,000; (2) 50% of consolidated net income, as defined, of
the borrower, as defined, and the guarantors, as defined, after December 31, 2003; and (3) 50%
of the net proceeds or other consideration received for the issuance of capital stock after
December 31, 2003. Failure to satisfy the financial covenant tests could result in a scheduled
term-out of the facility. In addition, consolidated tangible net worth, as defined, must not be
less than the sum of (1) $485,011,000; (2) 50% of the quarterly consolidated net income of
borrower and the guarantors earned after December 31, 2003; and (3) 50% of the net proceeds or
other consideration received for the issuance of capital stock after December 31, 2003. Failure to
satisfy this covenant could result in a termination of the facility. The Company believes that it
is in full compliance with these covenants and is not aware of any covenant violations.
The Companys senior notes are not secured and the senior notes indentures do not contain
financial covenants. The senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured
basis, jointly and severally, by most of the Companys homebuilding segment subsidiaries.
E. Senior Notes and Total Debt Obligations
In December 2002, the Company completed a public offering of $150 million principal amount of
7% senior notes due December 2012 (the 7% Senior Notes) at a discount, with an effective yield of
7.30%. The principal amount outstanding, net of unamortized discount, at December 31, 2004 was
$148.7 million. Interest is due and payable on June 1 and December 15 of each year until maturity.
The Company does not make any principal payments and the 7% Senior Notes are fully due in December
2012. The 7% Senior Notes are guaranteed by certain of the Companys subsidiaries and may be
redeemed, at the election of the Company, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at the
redemption prices set forth in the 7% Senior Notes supplemental indenture.
In May 2003, the Company completed a public offering of $150 million principal amount of 5 1/2%
senior notes due May 2013 (the 5 1/2% Senior Notes) at a discount, with an effective yield of 5.74%.
Also in May 2003, the Company redeemed $175 million
principal amount of its 8 3/8% senior notes due
2008 (the 8 3/8% Senior Notes). The 8 3/8% Senior Notes were redeemed at 104.188% of their principal
amount, or $182.3 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest through the date of redemption. In
compliance with SFAS No. 145, the expenses related to this debt redemption of $9.3 million are no
longer treated as an extraordinary loss. In December 2003, the Company issued an additional $200
million principal amount of the 5 1/2% Senior Notes at a premium, with an effective yield of 5.57%.
The 5 1/2% Senior Notes have interest due and payable on May 15 and November 15 of each year until
maturity. The Company does not make any principal payments and the 5 1/2% Senior Notes are fully due
in May 2013. The 5 1/2% Senior Notes are guaranteed by certain of the Companys subsidiaries and may
be redeemed, at the election of the Company, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at
the redemption prices set forth in the 5 1/2% Senior Notes supplemental indenture.
In December 2004, the Company completed a public offering of $250 million principal amount of
5 3/8% medium-term senior notes due December 2014 (the 5 3/8% Medium-Term Senior Notes) at a discount,
with an effective yield of 5.55%. The 5 3/8% Medium-Term Senior Notes have interest due and payable
on June 15 and December 15 of each year until maturity. The Company does not make any principal
payments and the 5 3/8% Medium-Term Senior Notes are fully due in December 2014. The 5 3/8% Medium-Term
Senior Notes are guaranteed by certain of the Companys subsidiaries and may be redeemed, at the
election of the Company, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at the redemption
prices set forth in the 5 3/8% Medium-Term Senior Notes supplemental indenture.
F-16
The Company classifies the senior notes as corporate liabilities due to the fact that M.D.C.
Holdings, Inc. is the borrower and the senior notes are guaranteed by certain homebuilding
subsidiaries. The Companys total debt obligations as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 are as follows
(in thousands).
F. Retirement Plans
In October 1997, the Company established a defined benefit retirement plan (the Retirement
Plan) for two executive officers of the Company under which the Company agreed to make future
payments that have a projected benefit obligation of $11.8 million at December 31, 2004. The
Retirement Plan is not funded and benefits were fully vested as of December 31, 2004, the
measurement date, for both participants. Unrecognized prior service cost of $1.6 million at
December 31, 2004 is being recognized over the officers average estimated service periods.
Included on the December 31, 2004 consolidated balance sheet is an intangible asset of $1.6 million
related to unamortized prior service cost and a corresponding accrued pension liability of $2.1
million and an accumulated other comprehensive loss of $0.5 million. Accrued benefit costs as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $8.1 million and
$6.9 million, respectively. The aggregate benefit payments over
the next five years are expected to be $1.5 million. Below is a summary of
the changes in the projected benefit obligation, the assumptions used in its calculation and the
components of Retirement Plan expense for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(dollars in thousands).
The Company sponsors a Section 401(k) defined contribution plan that is available to all
of the Companys eligible employees. At its discretion, the Company may make annual matching
contributions. The matching
F-17
contributions have been funded with shares of MDC common stock, and the expense recognized by
the Company for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $3.2 million, $3.7 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
G. Stockholders Equity
Stock Dividends and Stock Splits
On December 14, 2004, MDCs board of directors
declared a stock split in the form of a stock dividend that was distributed on January 10,
2005. On February 23, 2004, MDCs board of directors declared a 10% stock dividend that was
distributed on March 23, 2004 to shareowners of record on March 8, 2004. In accordance with SFAS
No. 128, Earnings per Share, basic and diluted net income per share amounts, weighted-average
shares outstanding, and dividends declared per share have been
restated for all periods presented to
reflect the effect of all stock dividends and splits.
Equity Incentive Plans
A summary of the Companys equity incentive plans follows.
Employee Equity Incentive Plans In June 1993, the Company adopted the Employee Equity
Incentive Plan (the Employee Plan). The Employee Plan provided for an initial authorization of
2,795,100 shares of MDC common stock (restated for stock dividends and the stock split) for
issuance thereunder, plus an additional annual authorization equal to 10% of the then authorized
shares of MDC common stock under the Employee Plan as of each succeeding annual anniversary of the
effective date of the Employee Plan. Under the Employee Plan, the Company could grant awards of
restricted stock, incentive and non-statutory stock options and dividend equivalents, or any
combination thereof, to officers and employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The
incentive and non-statutory stock options granted under the Employee Plan are exercisable at prices
not less than the market value on the date of grant over periods of up to six years. In 2003,
options to purchase 325,611 shares of MDC common stock and 12,793 shares of restricted stock were
awarded under the Employee Plan. The Companys ability to make further grants under the Employee
Plan terminated pursuant to its terms on April 20, 2003.
In March 2001, the Company adopted the M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (the
Equity Incentive Plan). The Equity Incentive Plan provided for an initial authorization of
3,460,000 shares of MDC common stock (restated for all stock dividends and the stock split) for
issuance thereunder, plus an additional annual authorization equal to 10% of the authorized shares
of MDC common stock under the Equity Incentive Plan. In April 2003, an additional 1,573,000 shares
were authorized for issuance by vote of the Companys shareowners (restated for the March 23, 2004
stock dividend and the January 10, 2005 stock split). The Equity Incentive Plan provides for the
grant of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, stock units and other stock grants to employees of the Company. Incentive stock
options granted under the Equity Incentive Plan must have an exercise price that is at least equal
to the fair market value of the common stock on the date the incentive stock option is granted. In
2004, options to purchase 1,080,755 shares of MDC common stock and 13,391 shares of restricted
stock were awarded under the Equity Incentive Plan, which vest over a period of up to seven years.
Director Equity Incentive Plans In March 2001, the Company adopted the M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the Director Stock Option Plan). Under the
Director Stock Option Plan, non-employee directors of the Company are granted non-qualified stock
options. The Director Stock Option Plan provided for an initial authorization of 865,000 shares of
MDC common stock (restated for all stock dividends and the stock split) for issuance thereunder,
plus an additional annual authorization of shares equal to 10% of the then authorized shares of MDC
common stock under the Director Stock Option Plan. Pursuant to the Director Stock Option Plan, on
October 1 of each year, each non-employee director of the Company is granted options to purchase
25,000 shares of MDC common stock. Each option granted under the Director Stock Option Plan vests
immediately and expires ten years from the date of grant. The option exercise price must be equal
to 100% of the market value of the MDC common stock on the date of grant of the option.
F-18
A summary of the changes in stock options during each of the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 is as follows, restated as applicable for stock dividends and the stock split
(in shares of MDC common stock).
The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable options
at December 31, 2004.
MDC Common Stock Repurchase Programs
On March 24, 2003, the MDC board of
directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 1,350,000 shares of MDC common stock,
bringing the total authorization under the Companys stock repurchase program to 4,350,000 shares.
The Company repurchased a total of 727,100 shares, prior to the March 23, 2004 10% stock dividend
and the January 10, 2005 1.3 for 1 stock split, of MDC common stock in the first quarter of 2003,
bringing the total shares repurchased to 2,580,400. No shares of MDC common stock were repurchased
in the second, third or fourth quarters of 2003, leaving 1,769,600 shares available to be
repurchased as of December 31, 2003 under this program. The per share prices, including
commissions, for the 727,100 shares repurchased ranged from $25.15 to $27.29 with an average cost
of $25.71, adjusted for the March 23, 2004 10% stock dividend and January 10, 2005 1.3 for 1 stock
split. At December 31, 2003, the Company held 4,007,000 shares of treasury stock with an average
purchase price of approximately $12.56 per share.
During
the 2004 second quarter, the Company repurchased 155,000 shares of MDC common stock,
adjusted for the 1.3 for 1 stock split. No shares of MDC common stock were repurchased in the
first, third or fourth quarters of 2004. As of December 31, 2004 the Company had repurchased
3,509,000 shares of MDC common stock, leaving 2,145,000 shares available to be repurchased as of
December 31, 2004 under this program. At December 31, 2004, the Company held 31,000 shares of
treasury stock with an average purchase price of approximately $43.97 per share.
F-19
H. Supplemental Balance Sheet Information
The following table sets forth information relating to homebuilding accounts payable and
accrued liabilities (in thousands):
I. Interest Activity
The Company capitalizes interest incurred on its corporate and homebuilding debt during the
period of active development and through the completion of construction of its homebuilding
inventories. Corporate and homebuilding interest incurred but not capitalized is reported as
interest expense. Interest incurred by the financial services segment is charged to interest
expense, which is deducted from interest income and reported as net interest income in Note B.
Interest activity, in total and by business segment, is shown below (in thousands).
F-20
J. Income Taxes
The significant components of the provision for income taxes are as follows (in thousands).
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount that would be computed by applying the
statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes as a result of the following
(in thousands).
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. The tax effects of significant temporary differences that give rise
to the net deferred tax asset are as follows (in thousands).
F-21
K. Earnings Per Share
Pursuant to SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, the computation of diluted earnings per share
takes into account the effect of dilutive stock options. Weighted-average shares outstanding and
per share amounts have been adjusted for the effects of the 10% stock dividend distributed on March
23, 2004, as well as the 1.3 for 1 stock split effective January 10, 2005. The basic and diluted
earnings per share calculations are shown below (in thousands, except per share amounts).
L. Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, the Company is a defendant in cases primarily relating to
construction defects. These cases seek relief from the Company under various theories, including
breach of implied and express warranty, negligence, strict liability, misrepresentation and
violation of consumer protection statutes. The Company has reserved for these cases based upon
information provided to it by its legal counsel, including counsels ongoing evaluation of the
merits of the claims and defenses and the likelihood of the Company prevailing in these cases. In
the opinion of management, the outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect
upon the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
M. Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of
financial instruments at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For cash and cash equivalents, the carrying value is a
reasonable estimate of fair value.
Investments and Marketable Securities, Net
Investments in marketable equity
securities (other than the QSF assets, see Note A) are recorded on the balance sheet at cost, which
approximates market value. Accordingly, the carrying value of the investment is a reasonable
estimate of the fair value.
Mortgage Loans Held in Inventory
The Company generally purchases forward commitments
to deliver mortgage loans held for sale. For loans that have no forward commitments, loans in
inventory are stated at the lower of cost or market. The carrying value is a reasonable estimate
of fair value.
Lines of Credit
The Companys lines of credit are at floating rates or at fixed
rates that approximate current market rates and have relatively short-term maturities. The
carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
F-22
Senior Notes
The estimated fair value of the senior notes in the following table are
based on dealer quotes (in thousands).
N. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company believes that it is subject to risks and uncertainties common to the homebuilding
industry, including (1) cyclical markets sensitive to changes in general and local economic
conditions; (2) volatility of interest rates, which affects homebuilding demand and may affect
credit availability; (3) seasonal nature of the business due to weather-related factors; (4)
significant fluctuations in the price of building materials, particularly lumber, and of finished
lots and subcontract labor; (5) counter-party non-performance risk associated with performance
bonds; (6) competition; (7) the availability and cost of performance bonds and insurance covering
risks associated with our business; (8) slow growth initiatives; (9) building moratoria; (10)
governmental regulation, including the interpretation of tax, labor and environmental laws; and
(11) changes in consumer confidence and preferences. The Companys operations are concentrated in
the geographic regions of Colorado, Virginia, Maryland, California,
Arizona, Nevada, Utah, Texas, Illinois, Philadelphia/Delaware Valley and Florida.
The
Company has purchase obligations relating to open work orders and
estimates for land to be developed and homes under construction for
which the Company has not received an invoice for work to be
completed totaling $142.9 million at December 31, 2004.
To reduce exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, HomeAmerican makes commitments to
originate (buy) and sell loans and mortgage-backed securities. At December 31, 2004, commitments
by HomeAmerican to originate mortgage loans totaled $69.9 million at market rates of interest. At
December 31, 2004, unexpired short-term forward commitments to sell loans totaled $77.1 million at
market rates of interest.
MDC leases office space, equipment and certain of its model show homes under non-cancelable
operating leases. Future minimum rental payments for leases with initial terms in excess of one
year total $12.5 million in 2005, $10.6 million in 2006, $9.3 million in 2007, $8.6 million in 2008
and $6.2 million in 2009 and thereafter. Rent expense under cancelable and non-cancelable leases
totaled $16.4 million, $12.1 million and $8.4 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The Company often is required to obtain bonds and letters of credit in support of its related
obligations with respect to subdivision improvement, homeowners association dues and start-up
expenses, warranty work, contractors license fees, earnest money deposits, etc. At December 31,
2004, the Company had issued and outstanding performance bonds and letters of credit totaling
$306.8 million and $94.7 million, respectively, including
$25.6 million in letters of credit issued by HomeAmerican. In
the event any such bonds or letters of credit issued by third parties are called, MDC would be
obligated to reimburse the issuer of the bond or letter of credit.
O. Related Party Transactions
MDC has transacted business with related or affiliated companies and with certain officers and
directors of the Company.
Certain affiliates of an officer and director of the Company sublease office space from the
Company, for which they paid rent, including parking, of approximately $0.1 million for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Gilbert Goldstein, P.C., a law firm of which a director of the Company is the sole
shareholder, was paid legal fees of $0.3 million, $0.2 million, and $0.2 million in 2004, 2003, and
2002.
F-23
The spouse of an officer and director of the Company owns a company that provides consulting
services to the Company. Total fees paid for these services were $0.2 million in 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively.
During 2004, the Company contributed 115,296 shares, adjusted for the 1.3 for 1 stock split,
of MDC common stock then valued at $6.3 million to the M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. Charitable Foundation
(the Foundation), a Delaware not-for-profit corporation that was incorporated on September 30,
2000. During 2003, the Company contributed 88,989 shares, adjusted for 1.3 for 1 stock split, then
valued at $4.0 million to the Foundation. The Company made no contributions to the Foundation in 2002. The
Foundation is a nonprofit organization operated exclusively for charitable, educational and other
purposes beneficial to social welfare within the meaning of section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code. Certain directors and officers of the Company are the trustees and officers of the
Foundation. The Foundation takes action with respect to shares held by it, including the voting of
such shares, by majority vote of the five member board of trustees and, accordingly, none of the
trustees should be considered to beneficially own such shares.
P. Summarized Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information (Unaudited)
Unaudited summarized quarterly consolidated financial information for the two years ended
December 31, 2004 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts). Weighted-average shares
outstanding and per share amounts have been adjusted for the effects of the 10% stock dividend
distributed on March 23, 2004, as well as the January 10, 2005 1.3 for 1 stock split.
F-24
Q. Supplemental Guarantor Information
The Companys senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis,
jointly and severally by the following subsidiaries (collectively, the Guarantor Subsidiaries).
Subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Companys senior notes (collectively, the
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries) primarily consist of.
The Company has determined that separate, full financial statements of the Guarantor
Subsidiaries would not be material to investors and, accordingly, supplemental financial
information for the Guarantor Subsidiaries is presented.
F-25
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.
F-26
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.
F-27
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.
Year Ended December 31, 2003
F-28
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.
F-29
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.
Year Ended December 31, 2003
F-30
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.
F-31
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
.
None.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
.
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures was performed under the supervision, and with the participation, of the
Companys management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer. Based
on that evaluation, the Companys management, including the chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective
as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including
the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal
Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in
Internal Control Integrated Framework,
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2004.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the fourth quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
31
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,
based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Companys management
is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the COSO criteria
.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2004, and our report dated February 15, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
32
Item 9B.
Other Information.
None
PART III
Item 10.
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
.
The information required with respect to directors and executive officers is incorporated
herein by reference, when filed, from the Companys proxy statement (the Proxy Statement) for the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about April 21, 2005, to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). The information with respect to our audit committee
financial expert is incorporated herein by reference, when filed, from the Proxy Statement.
We will provide to any shareholder or other person without charge, upon request, a copy of our
Corporate Code of Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines, code of ethics applicable to our chief
executive officer and senior financial officers and the charters for our Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee. You may obtain these
documents on our website at http://www.richmondamerican.com, under our Investor Relations section
or by contacting our Investor Relations department at 303-804-7708. Our intention is to post on our
website any amendments to or waivers from our code of ethics applicable to our chief executive
officer and senior financial officers if such disclosure is required.
The information regarding filings under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is incorporated
herein by reference, when filed from the Proxy Statement.
Pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, the
Company submitted the Annual CEO Certification to the NYSE on May 14, 2004.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
.
Information required to be set forth hereunder has been omitted and will be incorporated by
reference, when filed, from the Companys Proxy Statement.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
.
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2004 with respect to the shares of
MDC common stock that may be issued under existing equity compensation plans, all of which have
been approved by the shareowners.
Please refer to the discussion of the Companys equity incentive plans in Note G to the
Companys consolidated financial statements for a description of the plans and the types of grants,
in addition to options, that may be made under the plans. The referenced discussion also describes
the formula by which the number of securities available for issuance under the current plans
automatically increases.
33
Other information required to be set forth hereunder has been omitted and will be incorporated
by reference, when filed, from the Companys Proxy Statement.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
.
Information required to be set forth hereunder has been omitted and will be incorporated by
reference, when filed, from the Companys Proxy Statement.
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Information required to be set forth hereunder has been omitted and will be incorporated by
reference, when filed, from the Companys Proxy Statement.
34
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
.
(a)(1) Financial Statements.
The following consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries are
included in Part II, Item 8.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules.
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not material, not required or the
required information is included in the applicable financial statements or notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits.
35
36
37
38
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on this 17
th
day of February,
2005 on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned officers and/or directors of the
Registrant, by virtue of their signatures to this report, appearing below, hereby constitute and
appoint Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and Paris G. Reece III, or any one of them, with full
power of substitution, as attorneys-in-fact in their names, places and steads to execute any and
all amendments to this report in the capacities set forth opposite their names and hereby ratify
all that said attorneys-in-fact do by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Three Months Ended
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31
$
55.26
$
55.19
$
58.15
$
67.11
$
40.04
$
43.13
$
46.19
$
51.54
$
26.54
$
37.17
$
38.52
$
49.58
$
22.66
$
23.93
$
33.05
$
37.48
Date of
Date of
Dividend
Declaration
Payment
per Share
Dollars
January 26, 2004
February 26, 2004
$
0.0874
$
3,694
April 27, 2004
May 26, 2004
0.1154
4,892
July 27, 2004
August 25, 2004
0.1154
4,898
October 25, 2004
November 23, 2004
0.1154
5,140
$
0.4336
$
18,624
January 21, 2003
February 21, 2003
$
0.0509
$
2,121
April 28, 2003
May 27, 2003
0.0572
2,341
August 4, 2003
August 28, 2003
0.0874
3,629
October 20, 2003
November 19, 2003
0.0874
3,721
$
0.2829
$
11,812
Table of Contents
Registration Statement No.
Additional Number of Shares
433,915
202,658
878,334
435,562
330,421
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
$
4,009,072
$
2,920,070
$
2,318,524
$
2,125,874
$
1,751,545
$
719,197
$
393,879
$
295,604
$
279,267
$
227,319
16,579
26,983
24,194
21,116
14,282
1,904
1,294
18,483
28,277
24,194
21,116
14,282
(100,766
)
(73,933
)
(45,754
)
(44,996
)
(38,400
)
$
636,914
$
348,223
$
274,044
$
255,387
$
203,201
$
391,165
$
212,229
$
167,305
$
155,715
$
123,303
$
9.19
$
5.11
$
3.97
$
3.75
$
3.02
$
8.79
$
4.90
$
3.83
$
3.64
$
2.95
42,560
41,521
42,103
41,560
40,858
44,498
43,333
43,657
42,836
41,773
$
0.434
$
0.283
$
0.197
$
0.153
$
0.126
December 31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
$
408,150
$
173,565
$
28,942
$
36,600
$
14,115
$
851,628
$
732,744
$
578,475
$
456,752
$
443,512
$
1,109,953
$
763,569
$
656,843
$
450,502
$
388,711
$
2,790,044
$
1,969,800
$
1,595,180
$
1,190,956
$
1,061,598
$
$
$
$
$
90,000
$
746,310
$
497,700
$
322,990
$
174,503
$
174,444
$
$
2,479
$
$
$
$
746,310
$
500,179
$
322,990
$
174,503
$
264,444
$
1,418,821
$
1,015,920
$
800,567
$
653,831
$
482,230
$
32.80
$
24.06
$
19.25
$
15.64
$
11.96
.53
.49
.40
.27
.55
.24
.32
.37
.21
.52
.34
.33
.29
.21
.35
.19
.24
.27
.17
.34
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
$
3,932,013
$
2,851,328
$
2,260,291
$
2,076,807
$
1,701,108
14,248
12,630
9,899
7,701
7,835
13,876
11,211
8,900
8,174
7,484
6,505
5,593
4,035
2,882
3,292
$
1,920,000
$
1,600,000
$
1,120,000
$
760,000
$
775,000
$
283.4
$
254.3
$
254.0
$
254.1
$
227.3
27.7
%
24.1
%
23.0
%
23.2
%
22.3
%
$
(23,864
)
$
83,927
$
(166,429
)
$
93,251
$
(63,457
)
$
(29,917
)
$
(6,785
)
$
(12,441
)
$
(3,219
)
$
(3,160
)
$
288,366
$
67,481
$
171,212
$
(67,547
)
$
41,802
12.3
%
12.8
%
12.3
%
12.1
%
11.9
%
(1)
Net corporate expenses represent (a) net realized gains and losses on corporate investments
and marketable securities; (b) interest, dividend and other income; and (c) corporate general
and administrative expense.
(2)
Excludes mortgage lending debt from the calculation.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
4,009,072
$
2,920,070
$
2,318,524
$
636,914
$
348,223
$
274,044
$
391,165
$
212,229
$
167,305
$
9.19
$
5.11
$
3.97
$
8.79
$
4.90
$
3.83
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2004 Increase (Decrease)
2004
2003
Amount
%
$
3,932,013
$
2,851,328
$
1,080,685
38
%
$
719,197
$
393,879
$
325,318
83
%
$
283.4
$
254.3
$
29.1
11
%
27.7
%
24.1
%
3.6
%
15
%
4,066
3,229
837
26
%
2,034
2,116
(82
)
-4
%
2,276
2,433
(157
)
-6
%
446
58
388
669
%
20
20
N/A
341
372
(31
)
-8
%
2,596
2,595
1
0
%
23
23
N/A
807
289
518
179
%
753
378
375
99
%
886
1,160
(274
)
-24
%
14,248
12,630
1,618
13
%
3,256
2,972
284
10
%
2,346
1,919
427
22
%
2,318
2,656
(338
)
-13
%
452
93
359
386
%
2
2
N/A
385
291
94
32
%
2,736
2,059
677
33
%
694
162
532
328
%
615
277
338
122
%
1,072
782
290
37
%
13,876
11,211
2,665
24
%
2,143
1,333
810
61
%
807
1,119
(312
)
-28
%
692
734
(42
)
-6
%
638
104
534
513
%
18
18
N/A
225
269
(44
)
-16
%
746
886
(140
)
-16
%
23
23
N/A
256
143
113
79
%
289
151
138
91
%
668
854
(186
)
-22
%
6,505
5,593
912
16
%
$
1,920,000
$
1,600,000
$
320,000
20
%
$
295.2
$
286.1
$
9.1
3
%
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2004 Increase (Decrease)
2004
2003
Amount
%
32
38
(6
)
-16
%
22
26
(4
)
-15
%
53
49
4
8
%
18
9
9
100
%
1
1
N/A
11
9
2
22
%
31
17
14
82
%
2
2
N/A
24
11
13
118
%
22
11
11
100
%
26
28
(2
)
-7
%
242
198
44
22
%
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
$
192.7
$
184.3
459.5
390.0
265.3
254.2
180.6
168.3
496.9
N/A
419.6
388.2
247.2
186.3
157.7
161.4
184.7
174.5
436.8
375.1
$
283.4
$
254.3
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2003 Increase (Decrease)
2003
2002
Amount
%
$
2,851,328
$
2,260,291
$
591,037
26
%
$
393,879
$
295,604
$
98,275
33
%
$
254.3
$
254.0
$
0.3
0
%
24.1
%
23.0
%
1.1
%
5
%
3,229
2,669
560
21
%
2,116
2,086
30
1
%
2,433
2,681
(248
)
-9
%
58
58
N/A
372
277
95
34
%
2,595
1,260
1,335
106
%
289
17
272
N/A
378
111
267
241
%
1,160
798
362
45
%
12,630
9,899
2,731
28
%
2,972
2,218
754
34
%
1,919
1,654
265
16
%
2,656
2,919
(263
)
-9
%
93
93
N/A
291
246
45
18
%
2,059
1,204
855
71
%
162
1
161
N/A
277
102
175
172
%
782
556
226
41
%
11,211
8,900
2,311
26
%
December 31,
2003 Increase (Decrease)
2003
2002
Amount
%
1,333
1,076
257
24
%
1,119
922
197
21
%
734
957
(223
)
-23
%
104
104
N/A
269
188
81
43
%
886
350
536
153
%
143
16
127
794
%
151
50
101
202
%
854
476
378
79
%
5,593
4,035
1,558
39
%
$
1,600,000
$
1,120,000
$
480,000
43
%
$
286.0
$
278.0
$
8.0
3
%
Table of Contents
December 31,
2003 Increase (Decrease)
2003
2002
Amount
%
38
44
(6
)
-14
%
26
24
2
8
%
49
61
(12
)
-20
%
9
9
N/A
9
6
3
50
%
17
18
(1
)
-6
%
11
1
10
N/A
11
4
7
175
%
28
20
8
40
%
198
178
20
11
%
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
$
184.3
$
167.0
390.0
390.4
254.2
250.5
168.3
N/A
388.2
345.2
186.3
188.8
161.4
176.8
174.5
166.0
375.1
330.3
254.3
254.0
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2004 Increase (Decrease)
2004
2003
Amount
%
$
24,728
$
22,245
$
2,483
11
%
$
2,093
$
1,972
$
121
6
%
$
22,657
$
28,622
$
(5,965
)
-21
%
$
18,483
$
28,277
$
(9,794
)
-35
%
$
1,652,206
$
1,478,334
$
173,872
12
%
$
749,440
$
418,999
$
330,441
79
%
53
%
63
%
-10
%
74
%
79
%
-5
%
Year Ended December 31,
2003 Increase (Decrease)
2003
2002
Amount
%
$
22,245
$
18,771
$
3,474
19
%
$
1,972
$
1,773
$
199
11
%
$
28,622
$
19,587
$
9,035
46
%
$
28,277
$
24,194
$
4,083
17
%
$
1,478,334
$
1,322,237
$
156,097
12
%
$
418,999
$
221,090
$
197,909
90
%
63
%
71
%
-8
%
79
%
81
%
-2
%
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Payments due by Period
Less than
After
Total
1 Year
1 3 Years
4 5 Years
5 Years
$
746,310
$
$
$
$
746,310
387,500
43,188
86,375
86,375
171,562
47,339
12,522
19,955
14,176
686
142,890
142,890
$
1,324,039
$
198,600
$
106,330
$
100,551
$
918,558
(1)
Our purchase obligations relate to open work orders and estimates for land to be
developed and homes under construction for which we have not received an invoice for
work to be completed.
(2)
The table above excludes $135.5 million of short-term indebtedness related to
the Mortgage Line.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
1.
A modified prospective method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with
the effective date (a) based on the requirements of SFAS 123(R) for all share-based
payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS 123 for
all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123(R) that remain
unvested on the effective date.
Table of Contents
2.
A modified retrospective method which includes the requirements of the modified
prospective method described above, but also permits entities to restate based on the
amounts previously recognized under SFAS 123 for purposes of pro forma disclosures either
(a) all prior periods presented or (b) prior interim periods of the year of adoption.
General Economic and Business Conditions
Changes in national, regional and
local economic conditions, as well as changes in consumer confidence and preferences, can
have a negative impact on our business.
Interest Rate Changes
Our homebuilding and mortgage lending operations are
impacted by the availability and cost of mortgage financing.
Changes in Federal Lending Programs
The availability of mortgage financing
under federal lending programs is an important factor in our business. Any change in the
availability of this financing could reduce our home sales and mortgage lending volume.
Availability of Capital
Our ability to grow our business is dependent on our
ability to generate or obtain capital. Increases in interest rates and changes in the
capital markets could increase our costs of borrowing or reduce the availability of funds.
Competition
The real estate industry is fragmented and highly competitive.
Our homebuilding subsidiaries compete with numerous homebuilders, including a number that
are substantially larger and have greater financial resources.
The Availability and Cost of Land, Labor and Materials
Our operations depend
on our ability to continue to obtain land, labor and materials at reasonable prices.
Changes in the general availability or cost of these items may hurt our ability to build
homes and develop new residential communities.
Table of Contents
The Availability and Cost of Performance Bonds and Insurance
Our operations
also are affected by our ability to obtain performance bonds and insurance at reasonable
prices. Changes in the availability and cost of bonds and insurance can adversely impact
our business operations.
Weather and Geology
The climates and geology of many of the states in which
we operate present increased risks of natural disasters and adverse weather. To the extent
that such events occur, our business may be adversely affected.
Governmental Regulation and Environmental Matters
Our operations are subject
to continuing compliance requirements mandated by applicable federal, state and local
statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, including environmental laws, moratoriums on
utility availability, growth restrictions, zoning and land use ordinances, building,
plumbing and electrical codes, contractors licensing laws, state insurance laws, federal
and state human resources laws and regulations and health and safety regulations and laws.
Product Liability Litigation and Warranty Claims
As a homebuilder, we are
subject to construction defect and home warranty claims, including moisture intrusion and
related mold claims that can be costly and adversely affect our business.
Other Factors
Other factors over which we have little or no control, such as
required accounting changes and terrorist acts and other acts of war, can also adversely
affect us.
Table of Contents
Maturities through December 31,
Estimated
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Thereafter
Total
Fair Value
$
$
$
$
$
$
746,310
$
746,310
$
773,113
5.76
%
5.76
%
Table of Contents
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
F-2
F-3
F-5
F-6
F-7
F-8
Table of Contents
M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
February 15, 2005
Table of Contents
(In thousands)
December 31,
2004
2003
$
389,828
$
163,133
28,932
10,152
40,963
32,096
5,671
4,232
9,022
7,460
474,416
217,073
16,961
8,246
31,018
8,394
851,628
732,744
1,109,953
763,569
115,544
88,419
2,125,104
1,601,372
1,361
2,186
178,925
140,040
10,238
9,129
190,524
151,355
$
2,790,044
$
1,969,800
Table of Contents
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share amounts)
December 31,
2004
2003
$
94,178
$
72,212
50,979
25,011
746,310
497,700
891,467
594,923
325,468
259,294
2,479
325,468
261,773
18,810
17,944
135,478
79,240
154,288
97,184
1,371,223
953,880
433
424
660,699
484,052
760,780
582,927
(1,418
)
(1,169
)
(290
)
(9
)
1,420,204
1,066,225
(1,383
)
(50,305
)
1,418,821
1,015,920
$
2,790,044
$
1,969,800
Table of Contents
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
3,951,644
$
2,859,086
$
2,272,195
56,610
60,216
45,356
818
768
973
4,009,072
2,920,070
2,318,524
3,232,447
2,465,207
1,976,591
38,127
31,939
21,162
9,315
101,584
65,386
46,727
3,372,158
2,571,847
2,044,480
636,914
348,223
274,044
(245,749
)
(135,994
)
(106,739
)
$
391,165
$
212,229
$
167,305
$
9.19
$
5.11
$
3.97
$
8.79
$
4.90
$
3.83
42,560
41,521
42,104
44,498
43,333
43,657
$
.434
$
.283
$
.197
Table of Contents
(In thousands)
Accumulated
Additional
Other
Unearned
Common
Paid-In
Retained
Comprehensive
Restricted
Treasury
Stock
Capital
Earnings
Income (Loss)
Stock
Stock
Total
$
408
$
356,943
$
342,485
$
(163
)
$
(412
)
$
(45,430
)
$
653,831
167,305
167,305
(41
)
(41
)
206
206
167,470
5
8,939
2,307
11,251
5,525
5,525
34
34
(29,403
)
(29,403
)
(8,292
)
(8,292
)
360
(559
)
199
151
151
413
371,801
501,498
2
(820
)
(72,327
)
800,567
212,229
212,229
(158
)
(158
)
147
147
212,218
12
20,333
3,425
23,770
12,561
12,561
896
896
2,882
1,118
4,000
(26,731
)
(26,731
)
(11,812
)
(11,812
)
(1
)
75,013
(118,988
)
43,976
566
(800
)
234
451
451
424
484,052
582,927
(9
)
(1,169
)
(50,305
)
1,015,920
391,165
391,165
(21
)
(21
)
(260
)
(260
)
390,884
10
13,840
1,063
14,913
16,030
16,030
1,231
5,069
6,300
(6,812
)
(6,812
)
(18,624
)
(18,624
)
(1
)
145,358
(194,688
)
49,331
328
(748
)
420
(140
)
262
(149
)
(27
)
237
237
$
433
$
660,699
$
760,780
$
(290
)
$
(1,418
)
$
(1,383
)
$
1,418,821
Table of Contents
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
391,165
$
212,229
$
167,305
9,315
41,906
35,677
26,907
(8,867
)
(6,116
)
4,101
(22,624
)
(4,875
)
(898
)
(467,747
)
(258,516
)
(328,064
)
(59,346
)
(51,793
)
(37,900
)
(38,885
)
67,898
(62,967
)
135,138
77,551
63,846
5,396
2,557
1,241
(23,864
)
83,927
(166,429
)
(29,917
)
(6,785
)
(12,441
)
1,816,738
2,353,400
2,627,632
(1,760,500
)
(2,428,234
)
(2,573,200
)
246,575
346,148
146,791
(175,000
)
(7,329
)
(18,624
)
(11,812
)
(8,292
)
(6,812
)
(26,731
)
(29,403
)
10,989
17,039
7,684
288,366
67,481
171,212
234,585
144,623
(7,658
)
173,565
28,942
36,600
$
408,150
$
173,565
$
28,942
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
31,742
$
30,217
$
20,276
$
212,610
$
126,298
$
85,304
$
$
2,479
$
Table of Contents
December 31,
2004
2003
$
14,465
$
15,116
(12,500
)
46,510
19,574
28,200
26,307
1,681
1,093
8,188
4,815
7,250
9,888
5,503
10,162
3,254
8,950
5,507
$
115,544
$
88,419
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
51,068
$
44,743
$
38,430
37,985
36,014
24,529
(24,629
)
(29,689
)
(18,216
)
$
64,424
$
51,068
$
44,743
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
391,165
$
212,229
$
167,305
(8,799
)
(8,574
)
(9,144
)
$
382,366
$
203,655
$
158,161
$
9.19
$
5.11
$
3.97
$
8.98
$
4.90
$
3.76
$
8.79
$
4.90
$
3.83
$
8.59
$
4.70
$
3.62
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
29.23
$
18.16
$
13.31
45.3
%
47.6
%
54.9
%
3.9
%
3.9
%
3.8
%
0.8
%
0.8
%
0.8
%
6.0 yrs.
6.0 yrs.
7.0 yrs.
Table of Contents
December 31,
2004
2003
$
(295
)
$
(274
)
5
265
$
(290
)
$
(9
)
1.
A modified prospective method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with
the effective date (a) based on the requirements of SFAS 123(R) for all share-based
payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS 123 for
all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123(R) that remain
unvested on the effective date.
2.
A modified retrospective method which includes the requirements of the modified
prospective method described above, but also permits entities to restate based on the
amounts previously recognized under SFAS 123 for purposes of pro forma disclosures either
(a) all prior periods presented or (b) prior interim periods of the year of adoption.
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
3,932,013
$
2,851,328
$
2,260,291
8,898
1,298
6,022
10,733
6,460
5,882
3,951,644
2,859,086
2,272,195
2,843,543
2,163,696
1,741,449
8,783
842
4,600
198,541
162,148
125,060
181,580
138,521
105,482
3,232,447
2,465,207
1,976,591
719,197
393,879
295,604
3,838
4,616
4,348
24,728
22,245
18,771
2,093
1,972
1,773
22,657
28,622
19,587
3,294
2,761
877
56,610
60,216
45,356
38,127
31,939
21,162
18,483
28,277
24,194
737,680
422,156
319,798
818
768
973
(9,315
)
(101,584
)
(65,386
)
(46,727
)
(100,766
)
(73,933
)
(45,754
)
$
636,914
$
348,223
$
274,044
Table of Contents
December 31,
2004
2003
$
157,687
$
117,620
20,961
21,200
178,648
138,820
52
(72
)
(815
)
159
1,050
1,133
(10
)
$
178,925
$
140,040
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
December 31,
December 31,
2004
2003
148,688
148,565
349,197
349,135
248,425
746,310
497,700
2,479
746,310
500,179
135,478
79,240
$
881,788
$
579,419
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
11,328
$
10,391
$
9,667
116
684
691
649
(167
)
246
(41
)
$
11,845
$
11,328
$
10,391
$
10,209
$
9,328
$
8,209
6.00
%
6.25
%
6.75
%
3.25
%
3.50
%
4.00
%
$
$
$
116
684
691
649
325
325
325
162
171
116
$
1,171
$
1,187
$
1,206
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
2004
2003
2002
Weighted
Weighted
Weighted
Average
Average
Average
Exercise
Exercise
Exercise
Shares
Price
Shares
Price
Shares
Price
6,432,452
$
23.36
6,460,713
$
16.49
5,567,358
$
13.28
1,243,255
$
60.68
1,649,925
$
39.97
1,904,091
$
22.60
(975,927
)
$
11.26
(1,405,078
)
$
12.13
(830,887
)
$
9.22
(463,023
)
$
29.81
(273,108
)
$
18.80
(179,849
)
$
15.65
6,236,757
$
32.21
6,432,452
$
23.36
6,460,713
$
16.49
2,641,376
3,057,190
2,280,874
8,878,133
9,489,642
8,741,587
2,441,048
$
21.98
2,430,152
$
16.49
2,715,822
$
12.97
Options Outstanding
Options Exercisable
Average
Weighted
Weighted
Range of
Number
Remaining
Average
Number
Average
Exercise Price
Outstanding
Contract Life
Exercise Price
Exercisable
Exercise Price
$15.35 - $17.95
891,894
1.28
$
15.36
890,228
$
15.36
$18.47 - $20.78
1,248,413
6.88
$
18.47
907,098
$
18.47
$20.85 - $21.39
1,211,607
4.75
$
21.39
180,828
$
21.39
$21.73 - $43.81
734,831
5.83
$
30.32
300,394
$
33.21
$44.68 - $46.92
939,387
8.88
$
44.69
$49.05 - $68.06
1,210,625
9.86
$
61.10
162,500
$
57.66
6,236,757
6.42
$
32.21
2,441,048
$
21.98
Table of Contents
December 31,
2004
2003
$
150,769
$
136,960
8,994
2,443
159,763
139,403
55,053
41,663
38,791
31,433
71,861
46,795
165,705
119,891
$
325,468
$
259,294
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
32,879
$
26,779
$
21,116
1,946
1,967
1,822
$
34,825
$
28,746
$
22,938
$
20,043
$
17,783
$
17,358
32,879
26,779
21,116
(28,702
)
(24,519
)
(20,691
)
$
24,220
$
20,043
$
17,783
$
5,785
$
6,583
$
6,170
(1,946
)
(1,967
)
(1,822
)
$
3,839
$
4,616
$
4,348
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
220,662
$
123,630
$
88,999
33,954
18,480
13,639
254,616
142,110
102,638
(8,486
)
(5,473
)
3,906
(381
)
(643
)
195
(8,867
)
(6,116
)
4,101
$
245,749
$
135,994
$
106,739
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
222,920
$
121,878
$
95,915
192
175
175
22,292
13,929
8,615
345
12
2,034
$
245,749
$
135,994
$
106,739
38.6
%
39.0
%
39.0
%
December 31,
2004
2003
$
35,474
$
27,160
1,879
2,284
7,484
7,012
10,576
11,295
55,413
47,751
7,342
8,014
1,193
1,153
1,615
1,305
2,082
2,345
2,218
2,838
14,450
15,655
$
40,963
$
32,096
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$
391,165
$
212,229
$
167,305
42,560
41,521
42,103
$
9.19
$
5.11
$
3.97
$
391,165
$
212,229
$
167,305
42,560
41,521
42,103
1,938
1,812
1,553
44,498
43,333
43,656
$
8.79
$
4.90
$
3.83
Table of Contents
December 31, 2004
December 31, 2003
Recorded
Estimated
Recorded
Estimated
Amount
Fair Value
Amount
Fair Value
$
148,688
$
168,225
$
148,565
$
166,805
$
349,197
$
356,188
$
349,135
$
350,970
$
248,425
$
248,700
$
$
Table of Contents
Quarter
Fourth
Third
Second
First
$
1,343,858
$
1,026,129
$
875,483
$
763,604
$
371,528
$
283,894
$
237,643
$
195,405
$
142,623
$
105,073
$
82,568
$
60,901
$
3.31
$
2.47
$
1.95
$
1.44
$
3.17
$
2.36
$
1.87
$
1.38
43,117
42,493
42,318
42,306
44,960
44,442
44,233
44,282
Quarter
Fourth
Third
Second
First
$
862,080
$
798,906
$
689,442
$
596,642
$
211,718
$
193,487
$
156,454
$
125,973
$
67,022
$
65,476
$
42,694
$
37,037
$
1.59
$
1.57
$
1.04
$
.90
$
1.52
$
1.51
$
1.00
$
.87
42,073
41,564
41,024
41,463
44,041
43,333
42,781
42,804
Table of Contents
M.D.C. Land Corporation
RAH of Texas, LP
RAH Texas Holdings, LLC
RAH of Florida, Inc.
Richmond American Construction, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of Arizona, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of California, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of Colorado, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of Florida, LP.
Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of Nevada, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of Texas, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of Utah, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of Virginia, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of Delaware, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of Illinois, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of New Jersey, Inc.
Richmond American Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc.
American Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
American Home Title and Escrow Company
HomeAmerican Mortgage Corporation
Lion Insurance Company
StarAmerican Insurance Ltd.
Allegiant Insurance Company, Inc., A Risk Retention Group
AHT Reinsurance, Inc
Table of Contents
Supplemental Combining Balance Sheet
December 31, 2004
(In thousands)
Table of Contents
Supplemental Combining Balance Sheet
December 31, 2003
(In thousands)
Table of Contents
Supplemental Combining Statements of Income
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2004
Table of Contents
Supplemental Combining Statements of Income
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2002
Table of Contents
Supplemental Combining Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2004
Non-
Guarantor
Guarantor
Eliminating
Consolidated
MDC
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries
Entries
MDC
$
(26,147
)
$
34,228
$
(31,298
)
$
(647
)
$
(23,864
)
(23,358
)
(6,198
)
(361
)
(29,917
)
44,719
(22,113
)
(22,606
)
1,760,500
56,238
1,816,738
(1,760,500
)
(1,760,500
)
246,575
246,575
(19,271
)
647
(18,624
)
(6,812
)
(6,812
)
10,989
10,989
276,200
(22,113
)
33,632
647
288,366
226,695
5,917
1,973
234,585
163,133
6,335
4,097
173,565
$
389,828
$
12,252
$
6,070
$
$
408,150
Non-
Guarantor
Guarantor
Eliminating
Consolidated
MDC
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries
Entries
MDC
$
21,846
$
(34,120
)
$
96,623
$
(422
)
$
83,927
(2,088
)
(3,700
)
(997
)
(6,785
)
(21,682
)
39,984
(18,302
)
2,353,400
2,353,400
(2,353,400
)
(74,834
)
(2,428,234
)
346,148
346,148
(175,000
)
(175,000
)
(7,329
)
(7,329
)
(12,234
)
422
(11,812
)
(26,731
)
(26,731
)
17,039
17,039
120,211
39,984
(93,136
)
422
67,481
139,969
2,164
2,490
144,623
23,164
4,171
1,607
28,942
$
163,133
$
6,335
$
4,097
$
$
173,565
Table of Contents
Supplemental Combining Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2002
Non-
Guarantor
Guarantor
Eliminating
Consolidated
MDC
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries
Entries
MDC
$
14,770
$
(140,207
)
$
(40,698
)
$
(294
)
$
(166,429
)
(10,177
)
(2,018
)
(246
)
(12,441
)
(129,237
)
142,044
(12,807
)
2,573,200
54,432
2,627,632
(2,573,200
)
(2,573,200
)
146,791
146,791
(8,586
)
294
(8,292
)
(29,403
)
(29,403
)
7,684
7,684
(12,751
)
142,044
41,625
294
171,212
(8,158
)
(181
)
681
(7,658
)
31,322
4,352
926
36,600
$
23,164
$
4,171
$
1,607
$
$
28,942
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
/s/Ernst & Young LLP
February 15, 2005
Table of Contents
Common Shares
Common Shares Remaining
to be Issued Upon
Weighted-Average
Available for Future
Exercise of
Exercise Price of
Issuance Under Equity
Outstanding Options
Outstanding Options
Compensation Plans
1,948,345
$
19.74
3,831,520
$
37.58
2,244,024
456,892
$
40.37
397,352
6,236,757
$
32.21
2,641,376
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Page
F-2
F-3
F-5
F-6
F-7
F-8
3.1
Form of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.
(hereinafter sometimes referred to as MDC, the Company or the Registrant) regarding
director liability, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on July 1, 1987
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1(a) of the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1987). *
3.2
Form of Certificate of Incorporation of MDC, as amended (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.1(b) of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated June 30,
1987). *
3.3
Form of Amendment to the Bylaws of MDC regarding indemnification adopted by its board
of directors and effective as of March 20, 1987 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.2(a) of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1987). *
3.4
Form of Bylaws of MDC, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2(b)
of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1987). *
4.1
Indenture dated as of December 3, 2002, by and among MDC and U.S. Bank National
Association (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
the Companys Form S-3/A filed September 1, 2004). *
4.2
Form of Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 3, 2002, by and among MDC, the
Guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association (including without limitation
the form of 7.0% Senior Notes due 2012 and form of Guarantee appended to such Supplemental
Indenture) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Form 8-K filed
December 3, 2002). *
Table of Contents
4.3
Form of Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 19, 2003, by and among MDC, the
Guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association (including without limitation
the form of 5 1/2% Senior Notes due 2013 and form of Guarantee appended to such
Supplemental Indenture) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys
Form 8-K dated May 19, 2003). *
4.4
Second Supplemental Indenture (7.0% Senior Notes Due 2012), dated as of September 29,
2003, by and among MDC, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Richmond American
Homes of Florida, LP, a Colorado limited partnership and a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company, as Additional Guarantor, including the Guaranty signed by the Additional Guarantor
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Form 10-Q dated September
30, 2003). *
4.5
Second Supplemental Indenture (5.5% Senior Notes Due 2013), dated as of September 29,
2003, by and among MDC, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Richmond American
Homes of Florida, LP, a Colorado limited partnership and a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company, as Additional Guarantor, including the Guaranty signed by the Additional Guarantor
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Form 10-Q dated September
30, 2003). *
4.6
Third Supplemental Indenture (7.0% Senior Notes Due 2012), dated as of February 12,
2004, by and among MDC, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, and the following
wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company: Richmond American Homes of Delaware, Inc., a
Colorado corporation, Richmond American Homes of Illinois, Inc., a Colorado corporation,
Richmond American Homes of New Jersey, Inc., a Colorado corporation, and Richmond American
Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc., a Colorado corporation, as Additional Guarantors, including
the Guaranty signed by the Additional Guarantors (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.6 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2003). *
4.7
Third Supplemental Indenture (5.5% Senior Notes Due 2013), dated as of February 12,
2004, by and among MDC, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, and the following
wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company: Richmond American Homes of Delaware, Inc., a
Colorado corporation, Richmond American Homes of Illinois, Inc., a Colorado corporation,
Richmond American Homes of New Jersey, Inc., a Colorado corporation, and Richmond American
Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc., a Colorado corporation, as Additional Guarantors, including
the Guaranty signed by the Additional Guarantors (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.7 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2003). *
4.8
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 6, 2004, by and among MDC, the
Guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to
MDCs Medium Term Senior Notes (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Companys Form 8-K dated October 6, 2004). *
4.9
Pricing Supplement No. 1, dated December 6, 2004, with respect to MDCs 5.375% Medium Term
Senior Notes due 2014 (incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Rule 424(b)(2)
filing on December 8, 2004). *
10.1
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of January 28, 2005, among MDC as
Borrower and the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative
Agent, including form of Amended and Restated Guaranty and form of Promissory Note.
10.2
Third Amended and Restated Warehousing Credit Agreement dated as of October 23, 2003,
among HomeAmerican Mortgage Corporation and the Banks that are signatories thereto and U.S.
Bank National Association, as administrative agent (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2003). *
Table of Contents
10.3
First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Warehousing Credit Agreement dated
February 27, 2004 among HomeAmerican Mortgage Corporation and the Banks that are
signatories thereto and U.S. Bank National Association as administrative agent
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 10-Q dated June 30,
2004). *
10.4
Second Amendment to Third Amended and restated Warehousing Credit Agreement, dated
September 28, 2004, among HomeAmerican Mortgage Corporation and the Banks that are
signatories thereto and U.S. Bank National Associations as administrative agent
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 10-Q dated
September 30, 2004). *
10.5
The Companys Employee Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit A of the Companys Proxy Statement dated May 14, 1993 relating to the 1993 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders). *
10.6
Form of Non-Statutory Option Agreement (Employee Equity Incentive Plan).
10.7
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Employee Equity Incentive Plan) (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Companys Form 10-K dated December 31, 1998). *
10.8
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Effective March 26, 2001 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit B of the Companys Proxy Statement dated March 31, 2001
relating to the 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders). *
10.9
First Amendment to M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, effective April
28, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Form 10-Q dated
March 31, 2003). *
10.10
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Certificate (2001 Equity Incentive Plan).
10.11
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (2001 Equity Incentive Plan).
10.12
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors Effective March 26,
2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit C of the Companys Proxy Statement dated
March 31, 2001 relating to the 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders). *
10.13
First Amendment to M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors,
October 20, 2003.
10.14
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors).
10.15
Form of Indemnity Agreement entered into between the Registrant and each member of its
board of directors as of March 20, 1987 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 19.1
of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1987). *
10.16
Form of Indemnity Agreement entered into between the Registrant and certain officers
of the Registrant on various dates during 1988 and early 1989 (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.18(b) to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1988). *
10.17
Indemnification Agreements by and among the Company and Larry A. Mizel and David D.
Mandarich dated December 21, 1989 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 9 of the
Companys Form 8-K dated December 28, 1989). *
Table of Contents
10.18
Consulting Agreement, effective as of March 1, 2003, by and between Gilbert Goldstein,
P.C. and the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys
Form 10-Q dated March 31, 2003). *
10.19
Amendment to Consulting Agreement, July 26, 2004, by and between Gilbert Goldstein,
P.C. and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q dated June 30, 2004). *
10.20
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. Executive Officer Performance-Based Compensation Plan
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to the Companys Proxy Statement dated May
25, 1994 related to the 1994 Meeting of Stockholders). *
10.21
Employment Agreement between the Company and Larry A. Mizel, restated as of February
26, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Companys Form 8-K dated
February 26, 2003). *
10.22
Employment Agreement between the Company and David D. Mandarich, restated as of
February 26, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the Companys Form
8-K dated February 26, 2003). *
10.23
Change in Control Agreement between the Company and Paris G. Reece III effective
January 26, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form
8-K dated March 27, 1998). *
10.24
Change in Control Agreement between the Company and Michael Touff effective January
26, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form 8-K dated
March 27, 1998). *
10.25
Form of Change in Control Agreement between the Company and certain employees of
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys
Form 8-K dated March 27, 1998). *
10.26
Independent Contractor Agreement between Mizel Design and Decorating Company and the
Company effective as of January 1, 2005.
10.27
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan Prototype Retirement Plan and Trust
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K dated December 31, 2002). *
10.28
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan Prototype Retirement Plan and Trust Adoption
Agreement between M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. and INVESCO/BankOne, as of January 1, 2003
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K dated December 31, 2002). *
10.29
2003 Post-EGTRRA Amendments (401(k) Savings Plan Prototype Retirement Plan and Trust),
dated December 30, 2003. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2003). *
12
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Schedule.
21
Subsidiaries of the Company.
23
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
Table of Contents
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by 17 CFR 240.13a-14(b), pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by 17 CFR 240.13a-14(b), pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*
Incorporated herein by reference.
Table of Contents
M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.
(Registrant)
By:
/s/ LARRY A. MIZEL
Larry A. Mizel
Chief Executive Officer
By:
/s/ PARIS G. REECE III
Paris G. Reece III
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Signature
Title
Date
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
February 17, 2005
Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
February 17, 2005
Director
February 17, 2005
Director
February 17, 2005
Director
February 17, 2005
Director
February 17, 2005
Director
February 17, 2005