Quarterly Report




UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q

x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008

OR

o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from________to________
 
Commission File Number:  1-9764
 
 
Harman International Industries, Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Commission File Number:  1-9764

Delaware
 
11-2534306
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
400 Atlantic Street, Suite 1500
Stamford, CT
 
06901
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip code)
 
(203) 328-3500
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x Yes    o No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer     x   Accelerated filer     o
     
Non-accelerated filer       o (Do not check if smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company     o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     o Yes     x No
 
As of October 31, 2008, 58,545,866 shares of common stock, par value $.01, were outstanding.
 



 
Harman International Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
FORM 10-Q

Table of Contents

   
Page
     
 
Forward-Looking Statements
i
     
Part I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
     
Item 1.
 
     
 
1
     
 
2
     
 
3
     
 
4
     
Item 2.
20
     
Item 3.
29
     
Item 4.
30
     
Part II OTHER INFORMATION  
     
Item 1
30
     
Item 1A.
33
     
Item 2.
33
     
Item 6.
34
     
 
35
 
The page numbers in this Table of Contents reflect actual page numbers, not EDGAR page tag numbers.
 
References to “Harman International”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our” in this Form 10-Q refer to Harman International Industries, Incorporated and its subsidiaries unless the context requires otherwise.
 
 
Forward–Looking Statements
 
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). You should not place undue reliance on these statements. Forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations, capital expenditures, the outcome of pending legal proceedings and claims, goals and objectives for future operations, including descriptions of our business strategies and purchase commitments from customers. These statements are typically identified by words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate” and similar expressions. We base these statements on particular assumptions that we have made in light of our industry experience, as well as our perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors that we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. As you read and consider the information in this report, you should understand that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. In light of these risks and uncertainties, we cannot assure you that the results and events contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this report will in fact transpire.
 
You should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information in this report.  Our operating results may fluctuate significantly and may not meet our expectations or those of securities analysts or investors.  The price of our stock would likely decline if this occurs.  Factors that may cause fluctuations in our operating results include, but are not limited to, the following:
 
 
our ability to successfully implement our strategic initiatives and to achieve the intended benefits of those initiatives;
 
automobile industry sales and production rates and the willingness of automobile purchasers to pay for the option of a premium audio system and/or a multi-function infotainment system;
 
changes in consumer confidence and spending, the impact of the current credit markets and worsening economic conditions worldwide;
 
changes in interest rates and the availability of financing affecting corporate and consumer spending, including the effects of continued volatility and further deterioration in the financial and credit markets;
 
fluctuations in currency exchange rates, including the recent increase of the U.S. dollar compared to the Euro, and other risks inherent in international trade and business transactions;
 
warranty obligations for defects in our products;
 
our ability to satisfy contract performance criteria, including our ability to meet technical specifications and due dates on our new automotive platforms;
 
our ability to design, engineer and manufacture our products profitably under our long-term supply arrangements with automakers;
 
the loss of one or more significant customers, including our automotive manufacturer customers, or the loss of a significant platform with an automotive customer;
 
 
competition in the automotive, consumer or professional markets in which we operate, including pricing pressure in the market for personal navigation devices (“PNDs”);
 
our ability to achieve cost reductions and other benefits in connection with the restructuring of our manufacturing, engineering  and administrative organizations;
 
model-year changeovers in the automotive industry;
 
our ability to enforce or defend our ownership and use of intellectual property;
 
our ability to maintain a competitive technological advantage within the systems, services and products we provide into the market place;
 
 
Forward–Looking Statements (continued)
 
our ability to effectively integrate acquisitions made by our Company or manage restructuring and cost migration initiatives;
 
the valuation of certain assets, including goodwill, investments and deferred tax assets, considering recent market conditions;
 
strikes, work stoppages and labor negotiations at our facilities, or at a facility of one of our significant customers; or work stoppages at a common carrier or a major shipping location;
   
 
commodity price fluctuations;
 
the outcome of pending or future litigation and other claims, including, but not limited to the current stockholder and ERISA lawsuits or any claims or litigation arising out of our business, labor disputes at our facilities and those of our customers or common carriers;
 
changes in general economic conditions; and
 
world political stability.
 
Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, you should be aware that many factors could affect our actual financial results, results of operations and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. As a result, the foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read together with the other cautionary statements included in this and other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the information in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of Part I to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 and Item 1A, “Risk Factors” which is located in Item 1A of Part II of this report.
 
 
PART I
 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  
Cond ense d Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Harman International Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
($000s omitted except share amounts)
 
     
September 30,
     
June 30,
 
     
2008
     
2008
 
Assets
   
(Unaudited)
         
Current assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
195,135
     
223,109
 
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,963 at September 30, 2008 and $7,082 at June 30, 2008)
   
533,711
     
574,195
 
Inventories, net
   
406,741
     
390,638
 
Other current assets
   
222,410
     
251,139
 
Total current assets
   
1,357,997
     
1,439,081
 
                 
Property, plant and equipment, net
   
575,347
     
640,042
 
Goodwill
   
413,958
     
436,447
 
Other assets
   
310,355
     
311,355
 
Total assets
 
$
2,657,657
     
2,826,925
 
                 
                 
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
               
Current liabilities
               
Current portion of long-term debt
   
585
     
639
 
Accounts payable
   
301,917
     
343,780
 
Accrued liabilities
   
376,971
     
413,645
 
Accrued warranties
   
121,702
     
126,977
 
Income taxes payable
   
20,307
     
21,911
 
Total current liabilities
   
821,482
     
906,952
 
                 
Borrowings under revolving credit facility
   
25,000
     
25,000
 
Convertible senior notes
   
400,000
     
400,000
 
Other senior debt
   
1,980
     
2,313
 
Minority interest
   
---
     
34
 
Other non-current liabilities
   
146,039
     
152,780
 
Total liabilities
   
1,394,501
     
1,487,079
 
                 
Shareholders’ equity
               
Preferred stock, $.01 par value.  Authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued and outstanding
   
---
     
---
 
Common stock, $.01 par value.  Authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued 84,130,683 at September 30, 2008 and 84,117,883 at June 30, 2008
   
841
     
841
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
624,607
     
628,324
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
               
Unrealized (loss) on available-for-sale securities
   
(1,088
)
   
---
 
Unrealized gain (loss) on hedging derivatives
   
3,353
     
(1,328
)
Pension benefits
   
(12,253
)
   
(11,947
)
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment
   
106,032
     
204,806
 
Retained earnings
   
1,589,234
     
1,566,720
 
Less common stock held in treasury (25,599,817 shares at September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2008)
   
(1,047,570
)
   
(1,047,570
)
Total shareholders’ equity
   
1,263,156
     
1,339,846
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
2,657,657
     
2,826,925
 
 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 
Harman International Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
(000s omitted except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
 
   
Three months ended
 
   
September 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
                 
Net sales
  $ 869,190       946,962  
Cost of sales
    627,260       682,387  
Gross profit
    241,930       264,575  
                 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    209,473       223,134  
Operating income
    32,457       41,441  
                 
Other expenses:
               
Interest (income) expense, net
    (95 )     1,410  
Miscellaneous, net
    989       671  
                 
                 
Income before income taxes and minority interest
    31,563       39,360  
                 
Income tax expense, net
    8,351       3,657  
Minority interest
    (34 )     (826 )
                 
Net income
  $ 23,246       36,529  
                 
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.40       0.56  
                 
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.40       0.55  
                 
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic
    58,524       65,242  
                 
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted
    58,694       66,363  
 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


Harman International Industries, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
($000s omitted)
(Unaudited)
 
   
Three months ended
 
   
September 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
Net income
  $ 23,246       36,529  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    42,191       34,149  
Loss on disposition of assets
    65       81  
Share-based compensation (benefit) expense
    (3,448 )     4,946  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Decrease (increase) in:
               
Receivables
    5,838       (76,602 )
Inventories
    (43,841 )     (6,790 )
Other current assets
    20,423       2,658  
Increase (decrease) in:
               
Accounts payable
    (22,697 )     (40,871 )
Accrued warranty liabilities
    (5,275 )     13,705  
Accrued other liabilities
    3,752       6,170  
Income taxes payable
    224       (75,499 )
Other operating activities
    (2,545 )     (89 )
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
  $ 17,933       (101,613 )
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Contingent purchase price consideration
  $ (2,925 )     (3,347 )
Proceeds from asset dispositions
    58       164  
Capital expenditures
    (22,782 )     (27,469 )
Other items, net
    2,601       (1,910 )
Net cash used in investing activities
  $ (23,048 )     (32,562 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Net decrease in short-term borrowings
  $ ---       (1,838 )
Net borrowings under revolving credit facility
    ---       120,532  
Repayments of long-term debt
    ---       (16,486 )
Other increase (decrease) in long-term debt
    145       (529 )
Dividends paid to shareholders
    (732 )     (816 )
Share-based payment arrangements
    9       833  
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
  $ (578 )     101,696  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
    (22,281 )     3,464  
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (27,974 )     (29,015 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
  $ 223,109       106,141  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 195,135       77,126  
                 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
               
Interest (received) paid
  $ (1,157 )     2,194  
Income taxes paid
  $ 6,287       73,377  
 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
Note 1.   Basis of Presentation
 
Our unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements at September 30, 2008 and for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, have been prepared pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all information and footnote disclosures included in our audited financial statements.  In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.  Operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending June 30, 2009 due to seasonal, economic and other factors.
 
Where necessary, information for prior periods has been reclassified to conform to the consolidated financial statement presentation for the corresponding periods in the current fiscal year. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we revised our business segments to align with our strategic approach to the markets and customers we serve.  We now report the financial information for our QNX business in our “Other” segment.  The QNX business was previously reported in our Automotive segment.  As a result, segment information for the prior period has been reclassified to reflect the new presentation.  See Note 13, Business Segment Data , for further discussion.
 
The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”), have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements.  We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.  The estimates affect the carrying values of assets and liabilities.  Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.
 
Note   2.  Inventories
 
Inventories consist of the following:
 
   
September 30,
   
June 30,
 
($000s omitted)
 
2008
   
2008
 
Finished goods
  $ 174,301       150,634  
Work in process
    55,967       60,045  
Raw materials
    176,473       179,959  
Total
  $ 406,741       390,638  
 
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined principally by the first-in, first-out method. The valuation of inventory requires us to make judgments and estimates regarding obsolete, damaged or excess inventory as well as current and future demand for our products. The estimates of future demand and product pricing that we use in the valuation of inventory are the basis for our inventory reserves and have an effect on our results of operations. We calculate inventory reserves using a combination of lower of cost or market analysis, analysis of historical usage data, forecast demand data and historical disposal rates. Specific product valuation analysis is applied, if practicable, to those items of inventory representing a higher portion of the value of inventory on-hand.

 
Note 3.  Property, Plant and Equipment
 
Property, plant and equipment are composed of the following:
 
   
September 30,
   
June 30,
 
($000s omitted)
 
2008
   
2008
 
Land
  $ 13,546       14,659  
Buildings and improvements
    292,074       311,336  
Machinery and equipment
    1,018,958       1,082,359  
Furniture and fixtures
    45,362       46,749  
      1,369,940       1,455,103  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (794,593 )     (815,061 )
Property, plant and equipment, net
  $ 575,347       640,042  
 
Note 4.   Warranty Liabilities
 
We warrant our products to be free from defects in materials and workmanship for periods ranging from six months to six years from the date of purchase, depending on the business segment and product. Our dealers and warranty service providers normally perform warranty service in field locations and regional service centers, using parts and replacement finished goods we supply on an exchange basis.  Our dealers and warranty service providers also install updates we provide to correct defects covered by our warranties.  Estimated warranty liabilities are based upon past experience with similar types of products, the technological complexity of certain products, replacement cost and other factors. If estimates of warranty provisions are no longer adequate based on our analysis of current activity, incremental provisions are recorded.  We take these factors into consideration when assessing the adequacy of our warranty provision for periods still open to claim.
 
Details of the estimated warranty liabilities are as follows:
 
   
Three months ended
 
   
September 30,
 
($000s omitted)
 
2008
   
2007
 
Beginning balance  (June 30)
  $ 126,977       48,148  
Warranty provisions
    18,273       18,419  
Warranty payments (cash or in-kind)
    (10,718 )     (6,874 )
Other (1)
    (12,830 )     2,160  
Ending balance
  $ 121,702       61,853  
 
(1) Includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for foreign currency translation.
 
Note 5.   Revenue Recognition
 
Revenue is generally recognized at the time of product shipment or delivery, depending on when the passage of title to goods transfers to unaffiliated customers, when all of the following have occurred: a firm sales agreement is in place, pricing is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured.  We record estimated reductions to revenue for customer sales programs, returns and incentive offerings including rebates, price protection, promotions and volume-based incentives.  The reductions to revenue are based on estimates and judgments using historical experience and expectation of future conditions.

 
Note 6.  Comprehensive Income
 
The components of comprehensive income are as follows:
 
   
Three months ended
 
   
September 30,
 
($000s omitted)
 
2008
   
2007
 
Net income
  $ 23,246       36,529  
Other comprehensive income (loss):
               
Foreign currency translation
    (98,774 )     36,647  
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
    (1,088 )     ---  
Unrealized gain (loss) on hedging derivatives
    4,681       (3,280 )
Change in pension benefits
    (306 )     (9 )
Total comprehensive income
  $ (72,241 )     69,887  
 
We have approximately $21.1 million of investments included in other current assets that have been classified as available-for-sale securities under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities .  Under the provisions of this statement, these securities are recorded at fair value with realized gains or losses recorded in income and unrealized gains and losses recorded in other comprehensive income, net of taxes.
 
Note 7.   Earnings Per Share
 
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share outstanding:
 
   
Three months ended September 30,
 
($000s omitted except per share amounts)
 
2008
   
2007
 
   
Basic
   
Diluted
   
Basic
   
Diluted
 
Net income
  $ 23,246       23,246       36,529       36,529  
                                 
Weighted average shares outstanding
    58,524       58,524       65,242       65,242  
Employee stock options
    ---       170       ---       1,121  
Total weighted average shares outstanding
    58,524       58,694       65,242       66,363  
                                 
Earnings per share
  $ 0.40       0.40       0.56       0.55  
 
Options to purchase 2,232,011 shares of our common stock with exercise prices ranging from $32.14 to $126.94 per share during the quarter ended September 30, 2008, were outstanding and not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise of these options would have been antidilutive.  In addition, 28,870 shares of restricted stock were outstanding and not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they would have had an antidilutive effect.
 
Options to purchase 617,796 shares of our common stock with exercise prices ranging from $85.36 to $126.94 per share during the quarter ended September 30, 2007 were outstanding and not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise of these options would have been antidilutive.
 
The conversion terms of our 1.25 percent Convertible Senior Notes due 2012 (the “Notes”) will affect the calculation of diluted earnings per share if the price of our common stock exceeds the conversion price of the Notes.  The initial conversion price of the Notes was $104 per share, subject to adjustment in specified circumstances as described in the indenture related to the Notes.  Upon conversion, a holder will receive an amount in cash equal to the lesser of $1,000 or the conversion value of the Notes, determined in the manner set forth in the indenture.  If the conversion value exceeds $1,000, we will deliver $1,000 in cash and at our option, cash or common stock or a combination of cash and common stock for the conversion price in excess of $1,000.  The conversion option is indexed to our common stock and therefore is classified as equity.  As a result, the conversion option will not result in an adjustment to net income in calculating diluted earnings per share.  The dilutive effect of the conversion option will be calculated using the treasury stock method.  Accordingly, conversion settlement shares will be included in diluted shares outstanding if the price of our common stock exceeds the conversion price.
 
 
Note 8.  Convertible Senior Notes
 
On October 23, 2007, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes.  The initial conversion rate is 9.6154 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes (which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $104 per share).  The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in specified circumstances described in the indenture for the Notes.
 
The Notes are convertible at the option of the holders:
 
 
·
during any calendar quarter commencing after December 31, 2007, if the closing price of our common stock exceeds 130% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive tradings days ending on the last trading day of the preceding calendar quarter;
 
 
·
during the five business day period immediately after any five day trading period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes for each day of the trading period was less than 98% of the product of (1) the closing price of our common stock on such date and (2) the conversion rate on such date;
 
 
·
upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions that are described in the indenture for the Notes;  or
 
 
·
at any time after June 30, 2012 until the close of business on the business day immediately prior to October 15, 2012.
 
Upon conversion, a holder will receive in respect of each $1,000 of principal amount of Notes to be converted (a) an amount in cash equal to the lesser of (1) $1,000 or (2) the conversion value, determined in the manner set forth in the indenture for the Notes and (b) if the conversion value per Note exceeds $1,000, the Company will also deliver, at its election, cash or common stock or a combination of cash and common stock for the conversion value in excess of $1,000.
 
Debt issuance costs of $4.8 million associated with this transaction were capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the Notes.  The unamortized balance at September 30, 2008 was $3.9 million.
 
On October 23, 2007, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement requiring us to register the Notes and the shares contingently issuable upon conversion of the Notes.  On October 23, 2008, we filed an automatically effective registration statement with the SEC, thereby registering the Notes and shares contingently issuable upon conversion of the Notes.  We are required to keep the registration statement effective until the earlier of (a) such time as the Notes and the shares contingently issuable under the Notes (1) are sold under an effective registration statement or Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, (2) are freely transferable under Rule 144 more than two years following October 23, 2007, or (3) cease to be outstanding, or (b) five years and three months following October 23, 2007.  In the event we fail to keep the registration statement effective as required under the agreement, additional interest will accrue on the Notes at the rate per annum of 0.25%.
 
Note 9.  Income Taxes
 
Our provision for income taxes is based on an estimated annual tax rate for the year applied to federal, state and foreign income.  Income tax expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 was $8.4 million, compared to $3.7 million for the same period last year.  The effective rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 was 26.5 percent, compared to 9.3 percent in the prior year period. The rate was higher in the current period due to a favorable conclusion of a German tax audit recorded in the prior year.

 
As of September 30, 2008, unrecognized tax benefits and the related interest were $9.0 million and $2.4 million respectively, all of which would affect the tax rate if recognized.  During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded only interest related to uncertain tax positions of $0.3 million.
 
Note 10.   Share-Based Compensation
 
On September 30, 2008, we had one share-based compensation plan with shares available for future grants, the 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”).  The 2002 Plan permits the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units for up to 6,000,000 shares of our common stock.  During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, options to purchase 716,735 shares of our common stock, 5,000 shares of restricted stock and 350,771 restricted stock units were granted under the 2002 Plan.  In addition, 28,344 restricted stock units were granted outside the 2002 Plan during the same period.
 
Share-based compensation (benefit) expense was ($3.4 million) and $4.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The share-based compensation benefit recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2008 resulted from significant stock option forfeitures recorded in connection with the retirement of senior executives.   The total income tax (expense) benefit recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for share-based compensation arrangements was ($1.7 million) and $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
 
Fair Value Determination
 
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, which uses the assumptions noted in the following table.
 
   
Three months ended September 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
Expected volatility
    42.0% - 54.0 %     35.1% - 40.8 %
Weighted-average volatility
    49.0 %     37.0 %
Expected annual dividend
  $ 0.05     $ 0.05  
Expected term (in years)
    1.96 – 6.51       2.71 – 6.71  
Risk-free rate
    1.7% - 3.6 %     4.9% - 5.0 %
 
Groups of option holders (directors, executives and non-executives) that have similar historical behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. Expected volatilities are based on historical closing prices of our common stock over the expected option term. We use historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted is derived using the option valuation model and represents the estimated period of time from the date of grant that the option is expected to remain outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

 
Stock Option Activity
 
A summary of option activity under our stock option plans as of September 30, 2008 and changes during the three months ended September 30, 2008 is presented below:
 
   
Shares
   
Weighted
average
exercise
price
   
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term(years)
   
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
($000s)
 
Outstanding at June 30, 2008
    2,636,627     $ 73.40            
 
Granted
    716,735       32.50              
Exercised
    (800 )     11.00              
Forfeited or expired
    (411,280 )     80.06              
                             
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
    2,941,282       62.52       7.92     $ 5,967  
                                 
Exercisable at September 30, 2008
    811,094     $ 61.59       4.90     $ 4,663  
 
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $11.67 and $45.08, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $0 and $2.2 million, respectively.
 
A summary of the status of our nonvested restricted stock as of September 30, 2008 and changes during the three months ended September 30, 2008, is presented below:
 
   
Shares
   
Weighted average
grant-date
fair value
 
Nonvested at June 30, 2008
    92,910     $ 95.23  
   Granted
    5,000       32.83  
   Vested
    (15,000 )     88.93  
   Forfeited
    ---       ---  
Nonvested at September 30, 2008
    82,910     $ 92.61  
 
As of September 30, 2008, there was $3.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock-based compensation arrangements. The weighted average recognition period was 1.91 years.
 
Grant of Stock Options with Market Conditions
 
We granted 330,470 stock options containing a market condition to employees on March 21, 2008.  The options vest three years from the date of grant based on a comparison of Harman’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) to the TSR of a selected peer group of publicly listed multinational companies.  TSR will be measured as the annualized increase in the aggregate value of a company’s stock price plus the value of dividends, assumed to be reinvested into shares of the company’s stock at the time of dividend payment.  The base price to be used for the TSR calculation is the 20-day trading average from February 6, 2008 through March 6, 2008.  The ending price to be used for the TSR calculation will be the 20-day trading average prior to and through March 6, 2011.  The grant date fair value of $4.2 million was calculated using a combination of Monte Carlo simulation and lattice-based models.  Share-based compensation expense for these awards was $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.

 
Restricted Stock Units
 
In January and September 2008, we granted 34,608 and 28,344 cash-settled restricted stock units, respectively, outside the 2002 Plan.  These restricted stock units are accounted for as liability awards and are recorded at the fair value at the end of the reporting period in accordance with their vesting schedules.  On July 2, 2008, 1,608 of these restricted stock units were settled at a cost of approximately $0.1 million.
 
We granted 133,507 restricted stock units with performance conditions in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 under the 2002 Plan.  The restricted stock units vest three years from the date of grant based on attainment of certain performance targets in fiscal 2011.  The targets are consistent with our current business plans, and therefore it was deemed probable that 100% vesting would be achieved, requiring ratable accrual of share-based compensation expense over the three-year vesting period based on grant date fair value.
 
In the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we also granted 217,264 restricted stock units under the 2002 Plan that vest three years from the date of grant.
 
A summary of equity classified restricted stock unit activity as of September 30, 2008 and changes during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 is presented below:
 
   
Shares
 
Nonvested at June 30, 2008
    25,000  
 Granted
    350,771  
 Vested
    ---  
 Forfeited
    ---  
Nonvested at September 30, 2008
    375,771  
 
At September 30, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of equity classified restricted stock units was $12.8 million.  As of September 30, 2008, there was $9.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock unit compensation arrangements. The weighted average recognition period was 2.83 years.
 
Chief Executive Officer Special Enterprise Value Bonus
 
Our Chief Executive Officer was granted a special bonus award in November 2007.  The award will be settled in cash based on a comparison of Harman’s enterprise value at November 2012 to the enterprise value at the grant date in November 2007.  The award is classified as a liability award.  As a result, the fair value is required to be measured each quarter.  The fair value of this award at September 30, 2008 was $0.8 million, calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation.  No compensation expense was recorded during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 due to the decrease in the award’s computed fair value.
 
Note 11.   Restructuring Program
 
We announced a restructuring program in June 2006 designed to increase efficiency in our manufacturing, engineering and administrative organizations.  During the third quarter of fiscal 2008, we expanded our restructuring actions to improve our global footprint, cost structure, technology portfolio, human resources and internal processes.  These actions will reduce the number of our manufacturing, engineering and operating locations.
 
We have announced plant closings in Northridge, California and Martinsville, Indiana and closed a plant in South Africa and a small facility in Massachusetts.  We have also completed the transition of our corporate headquarters from Washington D.C. to Stamford, Connecticut.
 
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses included $4.9 million for our restructuring program, of which $2.2 million was recorded for employee termination benefits.  Cash paid for restructuring actions during the quarter totaled $7.0 million.  We also recorded $5.6 million in cost of sales relating to accelerated depreciation and the classification of the Martinsville property from held and used to held for sale, both of which were recorded in accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets .
 
 
Below is a rollforward of our restructuring accrual, accounted for in accordance with SFAS 88, SFAS 112 and SFAS 146:
 
   
Three months ended
September 30,
 
($000s omitted)
 
2008
   
2007
 
Beginning accrued liability
  $ 35,601       7,527  
Expense
    4,869       361  
Utilization (1)
    (7,847 )     (2,380 )
Ending accrued liability
  $ 32,623       5,508  
 
(1) Includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
 
Restructuring expenses by reporting segment are as follows:
 
   
Three months ended
September 30,
 
($000s omitted)
 
2008
   
2007
 
Automotive
  $ 3,618       320  
Consumer
    415       (11 )
Professional
    19       52  
Other
    817       ---  
Total
  $ 4,869       361  
 
Note 12.  Retirement Benefits
 
We provide defined pension benefits to certain eligible employees.  The measurement date used for determining pension benefits is the last day of our fiscal year, June 30. We have certain business units in Europe that maintain defined benefit pension plans for many of our current and former employees. The coverage provided and the extent to which the retirees’ share in the cost of the program vary by business unit. Generally, plan benefits are based on age, years of service and average compensation during the final years of service.  In the United States, we have a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) that provides retirement, death and termination benefits, as defined, to certain key executives designated by the Board of Directors.
 
Our retirement benefits are more fully disclosed in Note 16, Retirement Benefits , to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.

 
The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit costs:
 
   
Three months ended
 
   
September 30,
 
($000s omitted)
 
2008
   
2007
 
Service cost
  $ 606       917  
Interest cost
    2,190       1,588  
Amortization of prior service cost
    518       215  
Amortization of net loss
    68       303  
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 3,382       3,023  
 
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we made an insignificant contribution to the defined benefit pension plans.  We expect to contribute approximately $9 million in fiscal 2009.  
 
Note 13.  Business Segment Data
 
We design, manufacture and market high-quality, high fidelity audio products and electronic systems for the automotive, consumer and professional markets.  We organize our businesses into reporting segments by the end-user markets we serve.  Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance and allocate resources primarily based on net sales, operating income and working capital in each of the reporting segments.  We report on the basis of three segments:  Automotive, Consumer and Professional.
 
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we revised our business segments to align with our strategic approach to the markets and customers we serve.  We now report financial information for the QNX business in our “Other” segment.  The QNX business was previously reported in our Automotive segment.  Segment information for the prior period has been reclassified to reflect the new presentation.
 
Our Automotive segment designs, manufactures and markets audio, electronic and infotainment systems for vehicle applications primarily to be installed as original equipment by automotive manufacturers.  Our automotive products and systems are marketed worldwide under brand names including JBL, Infinity, Harman/Kardon, Becker, Logic 7 and Mark Levinson.  Our premium branded audio, video, navigation and infotainment systems are offered to automobile manufacturers through engineering and supply agreements.  See Note 14, Significant Customers.
 
Our Consumer segment designs, manufactures and markets audio and electronic systems for home, computer and multimedia applications and mobile applications.  Our Consumer home products and systems are marketed worldwide under brand names including JBL, Infinity, Harman/Kardon, Lexicon, Mark Levinson, Revel and AKG.  Our audio and electronic products are offered through audio specialty and retail chain stores.  Our branded audio products for computer and multimedia applications are focused on retail customers with products designed to enhance sound for computers, Apple’s iPod and other music control players.
 
Our Professional segment designs, manufactures and markets loudspeakers and electronic systems used by audio professionals in concert halls, stadiums, airports and other buildings and for recording, broadcast, cinema and music reproduction applications.  Our Professional products are marketed worldwide under brand names including JBL Professional, AKG, Crown, Soundcraft, Lexicon, DigiTech, dbx and Studer.  We provide high-quality products to the sound reinforcement, music instrument support and broadcast and recording segments of the professional audio market.  We offer complete systems solutions for professional installations and users around the world.
 
Our Other segment includes the operations of the QNX business, which offers embedded operating system software and related development tools and consulting services used in a variety of products and industries.  Our Other segment also includes compensation, benefit and occupancy costs for corporate employees.
 
 
The following table reports net sales and operating income (loss) by each reporting segment:
 
 
Three months ended
   
September 30,
 
($000s omitted)
 
2008
     
2007
 
Net sales:
             
Automotive
 
$
616,923
     
673,232
 
Consumer
 
105,918
     
119,438
 
Professional
 
136,859
     
145,221
 
Other
 
9,490
     
9,071
 
Total
 
$
869,190
     
946,962
 
               
Operating income (loss):
             
Automotive
 
$
20,464
     
44,537
 
Consumer
 
(999
)
   
(3,093
)
Professional
 
20,791
     
20,388
 
Other
 
(7,799
)
   
(20,391
)
Total
 
$
32,457
     
41,441
 
 
Note 14.  Significant Customers
 
Presented below are the percentages of net sales to and receivables due from customers who represent 10 percent or more of our net sales or accounts receivable for the periods presented:
 
   
Net Sales
   
Accounts
Receivable
 
   
Three months ended
September 30,
   
September 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
Daimler AG
    11 %     21 %     8 %     15 %
Audi/VW
    16       10       13       6  
BMW
    12       9       15       8  
Other customers
    61       60       64       71  
Total
    100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %
 
We anticipate that Daimler AG, Audi/VW and BMW will continue to account for a significant portion of our net sales and accounts receivable for the foreseeable future.  Our automotive customers are not obligated to any long-term purchase of our products.
 
Note 15.  Commitments and Contingencies
 
In re Harman International Industries, Inc. Securities Litigation
 
On October 1, 2007, a purported class action lawsuit was filed by Cheolan Kim (the “Kim Plaintiff”) against the Company and certain of its officers in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking compensatory damages and costs on behalf of all persons who purchased the Company’s common stock between April 26, 2007 and September 24, 2007 (the “Class Period”).  The original complaint purported to allege claims for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
 
The complaint alleged that defendants omitted to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s financial condition and business prospects.  The complaint contended that had these facts not been concealed at the time the merger agreement with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (“KKR”) and GS Capital Partners VI Fund, L.P. and its related funds (“GSCP”) was entered, there would not have been a merger agreement, or it would have been at a much lower price, and the price of the Company’s common stock therefore would not have been artificially inflated during the Class Period.  The Kim Plaintiff alleged that, following the reports that the proposed merger was not going to be completed, the price of the Company’s common stock declined, causing the plaintiff class significant losses.

 
On November 30, 2007, the Boca Raton General Employees’ Pension Plan (the “Boca Raton Plaintiff”) filed a purported class action lawsuit against the Company and certain of its officers in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking compensatory damages and costs on behalf of all persons who purchased the Company’s common stock between April 26, 2007 and September 24, 2007.  The allegations in the Boca complaint are essentially identical to the allegations in the original Kim complaint, and like the original Kim complaint, the Boca complaint alleges claims for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
 
On January 16, 2008, the Kim Plaintiff filed an amended complaint.  The amended complaint, which extended the Class Period through January 11, 2008, contended that, in addition to the violations alleged in the original complaint, the Company also violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) and Rule 10b-5 by knowingly failing to disclose “significant problems” relating to its PND “sales forecasts, production, pricing, and inventory” prior to January 14, 2008.  The amended complaint claimed that when “Defendants revealed for the first time on January 14, 2008 that shifts in PND sales would adversely impact earnings per share by more than $1.00 per share in fiscal 2008,” that led to a further decline in the Company’s share value and additional losses to the plaintiff class.
 
On February 15, 2008, the Court ordered the consolidation of the Kim action with the Boca action, the administrative closing of Boca, and designated the short caption of the consolidated action as In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation, civil action no. 1:07-cv-01757 (RWR).  That same day, the Court appointed Arkansas Public Retirement System as Lead Plaintiff and approved the law firm Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld and Toll, P.L.L.C. to serve as Lead Counsel.
 
On March 24, 2008, the Court ordered, for pretrial management purposes only, the consolidation of Patrick Russell v. Harman International Industries, Incorporated, et al. with In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation.
 
On May 2, 2008, Lead Plaintiff filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the “Consolidated Complaint”).  The Consolidated Complaint, which extends the Class Period through February 5, 2008, contends that the Company and certain of its officers and directors violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) and Rule 10b-5 by issuing false and misleading disclosures regarding the Company’s financial condition in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008.  In particular, the Consolidated Complaint alleges that defendants knowingly or recklessly failed to disclose material adverse facts about MyGIG radios, PNDs and the Company’s capital expenditures.  The Consolidated Complaint alleges that when the Company’s true financial condition became known to the market, the price of the Company’s stock declined significantly, causing losses to the plaintiff class.
 
On July 3, 2008, defendants moved to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint in its entirety.  Lead Plaintiff opposed defendants’ motion to dismiss on September 2, 2008, and defendants filed a reply in further support of their motion to dismiss on October 2, 2008.  The motion is now fully briefed.
 
We believe the lawsuit, which is still in its earliest stages, is without merit and we intend to vigorously defend against it.

 
Patrick Russell v. Harman International Industries, Incorporated, et al.
 
Patrick Russell (the “Russell Plaintiff”) filed a complaint on December 7, 2007 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and an amended purported putative class action complaint on June 2, 2008 against the Company and certain of its officers and directors alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and seeking, on behalf of all participants in and beneficiaries of the Harman International Industries, Incorporated Retirement Savings Plan  (the “Plan”), compensatory damages for losses to the Plan as well as injunctive relief, imposition of a constructive trust, restitution, and other monetary relief.  The amended complaint alleges that from April 26, 2007 to the present, defendants failed to prudently and loyally manage the Plan’s assets, thereby breaching their fiduciary duties in violation of ERISA, by causing the Plan to invest in Company stock notwithstanding that the stock allegedly was “no longer a prudent investment for the Participants’ retirement savings.”  The amended complaint further claims that, during the Class Period, defendants failed to monitor the Plan fiduciaries, and failed to provide the Plan fiduciaries with, and to disclose to Plan participants, adverse facts regarding the Company and its businesses and prospects.  The Russell Plaintiff also contends that defendants breached their duties to avoid conflicts of interest and to serve the interests of participants in and beneficiaries of the Plan with undivided loyalty.  As a result of these alleged fiduciary breaches, the complaint asserts that the Plan has “suffered substantial losses, resulting in the depletion of millions of dollars of the retirement savings and anticipated retirement income of the Plan’s Participants.”
 
On March 24, 2008, the Court ordered, for pretrial management purposes only, the consolidation of Patrick Russell v. Harman International Industries, Incorporated, et al . with In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation.
 
Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint in its entirety on August 5, 2008.  Plaintiff opposed defendants’ motion to dismiss on September 19, 2008, and defendants filed a reply in further support of their motion to dismiss on October 20, 2008.  The motion is now fully briefed.
 
We believe the lawsuit, which is still in its earliest stages, is without merit and we intend to vigorously defend against it.
 
Siemens vs. Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH.
 
In October 2006, Harman Becker received notice of a complaint filed by Siemens AG against it with the Regional Court in Düsseldorf in August 2006 alleging that certain of Harman Becker’s infotainment products including both radio receiver and Bluetooth hands free telephony functionality, infringe upon a patent owned by Siemens.  In November 2006 Harman Becker filed suit with the German Federal Patent Court in Munich to nullify the claims of this patent.
 
On August 14, 2007, the court of first instance in Düsseldorf ruled that the patent in question had been infringed and ordered Harman Becker to cease selling the products in question in Germany, and to compile and submit data to Siemens concerning its prior sales of such products.  Harman Becker has appealed that ruling.
 
Despite the pending appeal, Siemens AG provisionally enforced the ruling against Harman Becker.  Accordingly, Harman Becker ceased selling aftermarket products covered by the patent in Germany, and submitted the required data to Siemens AG.
 
On June 4, 2008, the German Federal Patent Court nullified all relevant claims of Siemens’ patent.  As a result, Harman Becker resumed selling the affected products, and Siemens suspended further attempts to enforce the patent.  Siemens also requested that Harman Becker suspend its appeal of the Düsseldorf court’s ruling of infringement until the German Federal Patent Court’s nullity ruling has become final.  Harman has consented to this suspension.  Harman Becker received the written decision of the German Federal Patent Court on August 18, 2008, and Siemens has appealed the decision to the German Federal Supreme Court. We expect these appellate proceedings to take at least three years until a final decision is rendered.

 
We intend to continue vigorously defending this lawsuit.
 
While the outcome of any of the legal proceedings described above cannot at this time be predicted with certainty, we do not expect these matters will materially affect our financial condition or results of operations.
 
Other Legal Actions
 
At September 30, 2008, we were involved in several other legal actions.  The outcome of these legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty; however, management, based upon advice from legal counsel, believes such actions are either without merit or will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
 
Automotive Supply Arrangements
 
We have arrangements with our automotive customers to provide products that meet predetermined technical specifications and delivery dates.  In the event that we do not satisfy the performance obligations under these arrangements, we may be required to indemnify the customer.  We accrue for any loss that we expect to incur under these arrangements when that loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we did not incur any material costs relating to delayed delivery of product to an automotive customer.  An inability to meet performance obligations on automotive platforms to be delivered in future periods could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition in future periods.
 
Note 16.  Fair Value Measurements
 
In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we adopted SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”).  The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).  The three levels are defined as follows:
 
Level 1 :
Observable inputs, such as unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for the identical asset or liability.
 
Level 2 :
Inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
 
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs that reflecting the entity’s own assumptions in measuring the asset or liability at fair value.
 
 
The following table provides the fair value hierarchy for financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis:
 
   
Fair Value at September 30, 2008
 
Description
 
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
 
Assets:
                 
Money market funds
  $ ---       31,593       ---  
Available-for-sale securities
    ---       21,062       ---  
Foreign currency forward contracts
    ---       4,636       ---  
Interest rate swap
    ---       390       ---  
Total
  $ ---       57,681       ---  
 
Money market funds and available-sale-securities are classified as Level 2 as the fair value was determined from market quotes obtained from financial institutions in active markets.
 
We use foreign currency contracts and an interest rate swap contract to hedge market risks relating to possible adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.  Our foreign currency contracts were measured at fair value using Level 2 inputs.  Such inputs include foreign currency spot and forward rates for similar transactions in actively quoted markets.
 
We have elected to use the income approach to value our interest rate swap contract, which uses observable Level 2 inputs at the measurement date and standard valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount (discounted).  Level 2 inputs for the swap contract valuation are limited to quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets (specifically futures contracts on LIBOR for the first two years) and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (specifically LIBOR cash and swap rates) at commonly quoted intervals, and credit risk.  These key inputs, including the LIBOR cash rates for very short-term, futures rates for up to two years, and LIBOR swap rates beyond the derivative maturity are used to construct the swap yield curve and discount the future cash flows to present value at the measurement date.  As the interest rate swap contract is a derivative asset, a credit default swap basis available at commonly quoted intervals has been collected from Bloomberg and applied to all cash flows. If the interest rate swap contract was determined to be a derivative liability, we would be required to reflect potential credit risk to lenders using a borrowing rate specific to our company.  See Note 17, D erivatives , for further discussion regarding our derivative financial instruments.
 
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No.159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS 159”), which allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on an instrument-by-instrument basis.  Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings.  We did not elect fair value measurement for financial assets and liabilities.  Therefore, SFAS 159 did not impact our results of operations.
 
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (“FSP 157-2”) which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 by one year for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis.  The provisions of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities will be adopted by us in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.

 
Note 17.  Derivatives
 
We use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge a portion of our foreign denominated forecasted purchase transactions.  These forward contracts are designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges and recorded at fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with a corresponding entry to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the underlying forecasted foreign currency transaction occurs.
 
When the transaction occurs, the gain or loss from the derivative designated as a hedge of the transaction is reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to either cost of goods sold or SG&A expenses depending upon the nature of the underlying transaction.  When it becomes apparent that an underlying forecasted transaction will not occur, the amount recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to the hedge is reclassified to the miscellaneous, net line item of the consolidated statement of operations in the then-current period.
 
Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged items because the amounts and the maturities of the derivatives approximate those of the forecasted exposures.  Any ineffective portion of the derivative is recognized in current earnings to the same line item of the consolidated statement of operations in which the foreign currency gain or loss on the underlying hedged transactions is recorded.  When it has been determined that a hedge has become ineffective, the ineffective portion of the hedge is recorded in current earnings. For the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we recognized no ineffectiveness for foreign currency forward contracts.
 
We elected to exclude forward points from the effectiveness assessment.  At the end of the period we calculate the excluded amount, which is the fair value relating to the change in forward points that is recorded to current earnings as miscellaneous, net.  For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized $0.9 million in net losses related to the change in forward points.
 
At September 30, 2008, we had forward contracts maturing through June 2009 to sell Euros and buy U.S. dollars totaling approximately $62.5 million to hedge future foreign currency purchases.  At September 30, 2008, the amount associated with these hedges that was expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings within the following twelve months was a gain of approximately $4.6 million.  The fair market value of the forward contracts as of September 30, 2008 was $3.8 million. In the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized a loss of $0.2 million from cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign currency transactions compared to less than $0.1 million in net losses in the same period last year.
 
When forward contracts do not meet the requirements of hedge accounting, we recognize the gain or loss on the associated contracts directly in current period earnings in cost of goods sold as unrealized exchange gains/(losses).  At September 30, 2008, we had forward contracts maturing through February 2010 to sell Japanese Yen and buy U.S. dollars of approximately $5.6 million to hedge foreign currency denominated purchases that were not eligible for hedge accounting.  For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized a loss on these hedge contracts of $0.1 million.
 
As of September 30, 2008, we had forward contracts maturing through November 2008 to purchase and sell the equivalent of $39.6 million of various currencies to hedge foreign currency denominated inter-company loans.  At September 30, 2008, the fair value of these contracts was $0.7 million.  Adjustments to the carrying value of the foreign currency forward contracts offset the gains and losses on the underlying loans in other non-operating income.
 
In February 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap contract to effectively convert interest on an operating lease from a variable rate to a fixed rate.  The objective of the swap is to offset changes in rent expenses caused by interest rate fluctuations.  The interest rate swap contract is designated as a cash flow hedge. At the end of each reporting period, the discounted fair value of the swap contract is calculated and recorded to other comprehensive income.  The accrued but unpaid net interest on the swap contract is recorded in rent expense, which is included in SG&A expenses in our consolidated statement of operations.  If the hedge is determined to be ineffective, the ineffective portion will be reclassified from other comprehensive income and recorded as rent expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized ineffectiveness of less than $0.1 million. As of September 30, 2008, the notional amount of the swap contract was $27.1 million and the amount recorded in other comprehensive income was a gain of $0.4 million.  The amount associated with the swap contract that is expected to be recorded as rent expense through September 30, 2009 is a gain of $0.2 million.
 
 
Note 18.  Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141R, Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”) which requires the recognition of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interests at the acquisition date fair value with limited exceptions.  SFAS 141R will change the accounting treatment for certain specific items and include a substantial number of new disclosure requirements.  These changes include (a) the “acquirer” recording all assets and liabilities of the acquired business, including goodwill, generally at their fair values, (b) contingent consideration arrangements being recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings until settled, and (c) acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs being expensed rather than treated as part of the cost of the acquisition and included in the amount recorded for assets acquired.  SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.  SFAS 141R will apply to any acquisitions consummated by us on or after July 1, 2009.  We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 141R on future acquisitions.
 
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133   (“SFAS 161”) which requires expanded disclosures about a company’s derivative instruments including how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows.  The required disclosures also include the location and fair value of derivative instruments and their gains or losses in tabular format, information about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements, counterparty credit risk, and the company’s strategies and objectives for using derivative instruments.  SFAS 161 is effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after November 15, 2008 with early adoption permitted.  SFAS 161 is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.  We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 161 on our consolidated financial statements.
 
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (“FSP APB 14-1”).  FSP APB 14-1 requires the issuer of convertible debt instruments with cash settlement features to account separately for the liability and equity components of the instrument. The debt would be recognized at the present value of its cash flows discounted using the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance. The equity component would be recognized as the difference between the proceeds from the issuance of the note and the fair value of the liability. FSP APB 14-1 will also require an accretion of the resultant debt discount over the expected life of the debt. The proposed transition guidance requires retrospective application to all periods presented, and does not grandfather existing instruments. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008.  Early adoption is not permitted.  FSP APB 14-1 is effective for us beginning July 1, 2009.  We expect the implementation of FSP APB 14-1 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and will result in higher non-cash interest expense for fiscal 2008 through fiscal 2013 and be dilutive to earnings per share.  We are currently evaluating our non-convertible borrowing rate and the fair value of the conversion privilege with respect to the Notes.
 
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”).  This FSP provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.  This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years.  Upon adoption, a company is required to retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data (including any amounts related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected financial data) to conform to the provisions in this FSP.  Early application of this FSP is prohibited.  FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for us beginning July 1, 2009.  We are currently evaluating the impact of FSP EITF 03-6-1 on our consolidated financial statements.
 
 
In June 2008, the FASB released Proposed Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 141(R) .  The proposed statement would (a) expand the population of loss contingencies that are required to be disclosed; (b) require disclosure of specific quantitative and qualitative information about loss contingencies; (c) require a tabular reconciliation of recognized loss contingencies; and (d) provide an exemption from disclosing certain required information if disclosing such information would be prejudicial to an entity’s position in dispute.  If approved as written, the proposed statement would be effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009 and all interim an annual periods in subsequent fiscal years.
 
Note 19.   Subsequent Events
 
Subsequent to September 30, 2008, we experienced a relatively consistent decline in market capitalization due to deteriorating market conditions and overall weakness in the automotive industry.  During this period, the market price of our common stock ranged from $34.07 on September 30, 2008 to $16.50 on October 27, 2008.  Based on the decline in the market value of our common stock, we are considering whether a triggering event occurred subsequent to September 30, 2008, requiring us to perform an interim period goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
 
In October 2008, we announced our intentions to close two engineering sites in Germany by June 30, 2009, consolidating activities into other facilities.  We also announced our intention to outsource our Automotive warranty service operation in the United States by the end of January 2009.  In November 2008, we announced the reorganization of our Consumer sales and marketing organization in the United States. We are currently evaluating the impact of these restructuring activities on our consolidated statement of operations.
 
 
General
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, together with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008 (“2008 Form 10-K”).  This discussion contains forward-looking statements which are based on our current expectations and experience and our perception of historical trends, current market conditions, including customer acceptance of our new products, current economic data, expected future developments, including foreign currency exchange rates, and other factors that we believe are appropriate under the circumstances.  These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested in the forward-looking statements.
 
We begin our discussion with an overview of our company to give you an understanding of our business and the markets we serve.  We then discuss our critical accounting policies.  This is followed by a discussion of our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.  We include in this discussion an analysis of certain significant period-to-period variances in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and an analysis of our restructuring program.  We also provide specific information regarding our three reportable business segments: Automotive, Consumer and Professional.  We then discuss our financial condition at September 30, 2008 with a comparison to June 30, 2008.  This section contains information regarding our liquidity, capital resources and cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities.  We complete our discussion with an update on recent developments and a business outlook for future periods.
 
 
Overview
 
We design, manufacture and market high-quality, high-fidelity audio products and electronic systems for the automotive, consumer and professional markets. We have developed, both internally and through a series of strategic acquisitions, a broad range of product offerings sold under renowned brand names in our principal markets. These brand names have a heritage of technological leadership and product innovation.  Our reportable business segments, Automotive, Consumer and Professional, are based on the end-user markets we serve.
 
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we revised our business segments to align our strategic approach to the markets and customers we serve.  We now report financial information for the QNX business in our “Other” segment.  The QNX business was previously reported in our Automotive segment.  The realignment reflects our focus to grow the QNX business in other, non-automotive industries, including networking, medical, instrumentation and industrial control.  Segment information for the prior period has been reclassified to conform to the new presentation.
 
Automotive designs, manufactures and markets audio, electronic and infotainment systems for vehicle applications. Our systems are generally shipped directly to our automotive customers for factory installation. Infotainment systems are a combination of information and entertainment components that may include or control GPS navigation, traffic information, voice-activated telephone and climate control, rear seat entertainment, wireless Internet access, hard disk recording, MP3 playback and a premium branded audio system.  We expect future infotainment systems to also provide driver safety capabilities such as lane guidance, pre-crash emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, and night vision. Automotive also provides aftermarket products such as PNDs to customers primarily in Europe.
 
Consumer designs, manufactures and markets audio, video and electronic systems for multimedia, home and mobile applications. Multimedia applications include innovative accessories for portable electronic devices including music-enabled cell phones such as the iPhone, and MP3 players including the iPod.  Our multimedia applications also include audio systems for personal computers.  Home applications include systems to provide high-quality audio throughout the home and to enhance home theatres.  Aftermarket mobile products include speakers and amplifiers that deliver audio entertainment in the vehicle.  Consumer products are primarily distributed through retail outlets.
 
Professional designs, manufactures and markets loudspeakers and electronic systems used by audio professionals in concert halls, stadiums, airports, houses of worship and other public spaces.  We also develop products for recording, broadcast, cinema, touring and music reproduction applications.  In addition, we have leading products in both the portable PA market and musician vertical markets serving small bands, DJs and other performers.  A growing number of our products are enabled by our proprietary HiQnet protocol which provides centralized monitoring and control of both complex and simple professional audio systems.
 
Our Other segment includes the operations of the QNX business, which offers embedded operating system software and related development tools and consulting services used in a variety of products and industries.  Our Other segment also includes compensation, benefit and occupancy costs for corporate employees.
 
Our products are sold worldwide, with the largest markets being the United States and Germany. In the United States, our primary manufacturing facilities are located in California, Kentucky, Missouri, Indiana and Utah. Outside of the United States, we have significant manufacturing facilities in Germany, Austria, the United Kingdom, Mexico, Hungary, France and China.  During fiscal 2008, we announced an expansion of our restructuring program that will reduce our manufacturing footprint and result in the closure of our Automotive manufacturing  facilities in California and Indiana.

 
Our sales and earnings may vary due to the production schedules of our automotive customers, customer acceptance of our products, the timing of new product introductions, product offerings by our competitors and general economic conditions.  Since our businesses operate using local currencies, our reported sales and earnings may also fluctuate due to foreign currency exchange rates, especially for the Euro.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, there were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from those disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and the related notes  included in our 2008 Form 10-K, except as discussed below:
 
Impairment of Goodwill
 
Goodwill is not amortized, and is tested for impairment on April 30 of each year, and whenever   events or changes indicate that impairment may have occurred.  In conducting our impairment testing, we compare the carrying value of a reporting unit to the fair value of the unit.  Carrying value is based on the assets and liabilities associated with the operations of that reporting unit, which often requires allocation of shared or corporate items among reporting units.  If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not considered to be impaired.  Our estimates of fair value are based on a discounted cash flow model, which includes estimates for sales and profit growth, discount rates, terminal value growth rates, future capital expenditures, and changes in working capital requirements.  While there are inherent uncertainties related to the assumptions used and to management’s application of these assumptions to this analysis, we believe the income approach provides a reasonable estimate of the fair value of our reporting units.  Our annual goodwill impairment test for fiscal 2008 resulted in no impairment.
 
At September 30, 2008, the goodwill balance was $414 million.  As a result of the current market conditions,  we evaluated whether certain triggering events had occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2008 that would require us to perform an interim period goodwill impairment test in accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets .  We concluded that no such events had occurred through September 30, 2008.  This conclusion was based primarily on our financial results for the three months ended September 30, 2008, which are consistent with the forecasts used for the annual impairment test performed in fiscal 2008.  We continue to evaluate the impact of recent events, including reports of weakness in the automotive market and deterioration of the financial and credit markets, on our projections used to assess the recoverability of goodwill.  Adverse changes in our projections may suggest the goodwill balance is impaired.
 
Results of Operations
 
Net Sales
 
Our net sales for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 were $869.2 million, an 8 percent decrease compared to the prior year period.  All three of our reporting segments reported lower sales compared to the same period in the prior year.  The effects of foreign currency translation had a positive impact on net sales of $48.2 million during the quarter. The decline in overall net sales was attributable to changes in sales mix as new product platforms are launched and customers make strategic sourcing decisions, overall weakness in the automotive market and the repositioning of our PND business.

 
Presented below is a summary of our net sales by reporting segment:
 
($000s omitted)
 
Three months ended September 30,
 
   
2008
   
%
   
2007
   
%
 
Net sales:
                       
    Automotive
  $ 616,923       71 %     673,232       71 %
    Consumer
    105,918       12 %     119,438       13 %
    Professional
    136,859       16 %     145,221       15 %
    Other
    9,490       1 %     9,071       1 %
Total
  $ 869,190       100 %     946,962       100 %
 
Automotive - Net sales for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 decreased $56.3 million, or 8.4 percent compared to the same period last year.  Foreign currency translation had a positive impact on net sales of $41.2 million during the quarter.  The reduction in net sales is primarily attributable to Daimler’s strategic decision to move to dual sourcing on select Mercedes models, as well as reduced production by some of the major automakers, specifically Chrysler and Toyota.  These reductions were partially offset by higher sales relating to the launch of our new platforms included in various Audi, BMW and Hyundai models.
 
Consumer - Net sales for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 decreased $13.5 million, or 11.3 percent, compared to the same period last year.  Foreign currency translation had a positive impact on net sales of $5.7 million during the quarter.  The consumer retail environment continues to be challenging as the worldwide economy slows.  The decline in net sales from the prior year period is primarily attributable to Consumer’s exit of the PND business and other unprofitable products.
 
Professional - Net sales for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 decreased $8.4 million, or 5.7 percent compared to the same period last year. Foreign currency translation had a positive impact on net sales of $1.3 million during the quarter.  The decrease in sales compared to the same period last year was primarily due to continued softness in the small project contracting business in the United States.  The weakening worldwide economy also contributed to a decrease in net sales across a number of our Professional brands.
 
Gross Profit
 
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased 0.1 percentage points to 27.8 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to 27.9 percent of net sales in the same period last year.  The modest decrease in gross profit margins was primarily due to lower margins in our Automotive segment, partially offset by an increase in gross margin in our Consumer and Professional segments.  
 
Presented below is a summary of our gross profit by reporting segment:
 
($000s omitted)
 
Three months ended September 30,
 
   
2008
   
Percent
of net
sales
   
2007
   
Percent
of net
sales
 
Gross Profit:
                       
   Automotive
  $ 153,587       24.9 %     174,542       25.9 %
   Consumer
    26,977       25.5 %     28,107       23.5 %
   Professional
    54,833       40.1 %     55,882       38.5 %
   Other
    6,533       68.8 %     6,044       66.6 %
Total
  $ 241,930       27.8 %     264,575       27.9 %
 

Automotive – Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased 1.0 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year.  The gross margin decline was primarily due to additional restructuring costs incurred in connection with the announced plant closings in Northridge, California and Martinsville, Indiana.  Restructuring costs recorded during the quarter at these locations relate to accelerated depreciation on machinery and equipment and the classification of the Martinsville property from held and used to held for sale.
 
Consumer – Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased 2.0 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year.  The improvement in gross margin results from a favorable product mix during the quarter as the Consumer division exited the PND market, where competitive pressures had adversely affected margins in the prior year period.  Improvements in gross margin were reduced by PND product inventory write-downs.
 
Professional – Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased 1.6 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year.  The increase in gross margin was primarily due to favorable product mix and lower manufacturing costs.  
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased 0.5 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in the prior year.  Despite the benefits received from our restructuring programs, which resulted in lower spending and lower headcount at our divisions, SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales were higher due to lower net sales.  Foreign currency translation adversely impacted SG&A expenses by $10.0 million during the quarter.  SG&A expenses decreased $13.7 million when compared to the same period in the prior year.  The decrease reflects a benefit from share-based compensation of $3.4 million resulting from the retirement of senior executives, which compares to $4.9 million of share-based compensation expense recorded for the same period in the prior year.  We also recorded a benefit in the quarter based on our Compensation and Option Committee’s decision to not make a profit sharing contribution under our Retirement Savings Plan for fiscal 2008.  A significant portion of the $5.0 million profit sharing accrual was adjusted in SG&A expenses.  The decrease further reflects a reduction in research and development (“R&D”) costs.  R&D, a significant component of our SG&A expenses, decreased to $86.7 million for the quarter compared to $87.8 million in the same period last year.  We continue to incur costs relating to our restructuring program, which is designed to address our global footprint, cost structure, technology portfolio, human resources and internal processes.  We recorded restructuring charges in SG&A of $4.9 million in the current period, which compares to merger related costs of $4.7 million for the same period in the prior year.  Restructuring costs are further described under the caption Restructuring Programs later in this discussion.
 
Presented below is a summary of SG&A expenses by reporting segment:
 
($000s omitted)
 
Three months ended September 30,
 
   
2008
   
Percent
of net
sales
   
2007
   
Percent
of net
sales
 
                         
SG&A Expenses:
                       
Automotive
  $ 133,122       21.6 %     130,005       19.3 %
Consumer
    27,976       26.4 %     31,200       26.1 %
Professional
    34,042       24.9 %     35,494       24.4 %
Other
    14,333       ---       26,435       ---  
Total
  $ 209,473       24.1 %     223,134       23.6 %
 
 
Automotive – SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased 2.3 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period last year.  The primary reason for the increase is due to higher R&D spending to support new automotive infotainment systems for platforms launching in fiscal 2009.  R&D expenses were $69.6 million, or 11.3 percent of net sales, for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to $68.9 million, or 10.2 percent of net sales, in the prior year period.
 
Consumer – SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased 0.3 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period last year.  The increase was primarily due to an overall decline in net sales due to the weakening economy partially offset by lower R&D spending.  R&D expenses were $5.8 million, or 5.5 percent of net sales, for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to $8.9 million, or 7.4 percent of net sales, in the same period last year.
 
Professional – SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased 0.5 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period last year.  The increase as a percentage of net sales resulted primarily from higher R&D spending related to new product launches in fiscal 2009.  R&D expenses were $9.4 million, or 6.8 percent of net sales, for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to $9.2 million, or 6.4 percent of net sales, in the same period last year.
 
Other – SG&A expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $12.1 million compared to the same period last year.  Other SG&A expenses primarily include compensation, benefit and occupancy costs for corporate employees.  The decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily due to a benefit from share-based compensation of $3.4 million resulting from the retirement of senior executives, which compares to $4.9 million of share-based compensation expense recorded for the same period in the prior year.  In addition, SG&A expenses for the prior year period included $4.7 million of merger related costs incurred in connection with our proposed merger with KKR.
 
Restructuring Program – We   announced a restructuring program in June 2006 designed to increase efficiency in our manufacturing, engineering and administrative organizations.  During the third quarter of fiscal 2008, we expanded our restructuring actions to improve our global footprint, cost structure, technology portfolio, human resources and internal processes.  These actions will reduce the number of our manufacturing, engineering and operating locations.
 
We have announced plant closings in Northridge, California and Martinsville, Indiana and closed a plant in South Africa and a small facility in Massachusetts.  We have also completed the transition of our corporate headquarters from Washington D.C. to Stamford, Connecticut.
 
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, SG&A expenses included $4.9 million for our restructuring program, of which $2.2 million was recorded for employee termination benefits.  Cash paid for restructuring actions during the quarter totaled $7.0 million.  We also recorded $5.6 million in cost of sales relating to accelerated depreciation and the classification of the Martinsville property from held and used to held for sale, both of which were recorded in accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets .
 
 
Below is a rollforward of our restructuring accrual, accounted for in accordance with SFAS 88, SFAS 112 and SFAS 146:
 
($000s omitted)
 
Three months ended September 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
Beginning accrued liability
  $ 35,601       7,527  
Expense
    4,869       361  
Utilization (1)
    (7,847 )     (2,380 )
Ending accrued liability
  $ 32,623       5,508  
 
(1) Includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
 
Please also see Note 11, Restructuring Program , for additional information.
 
Operating Income
 
Operating income for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 was $32.5 million, or 3.7 percent of net sales, compared to $41.4 million, or 4.4 percent of net sales in the same period last year.  The decrease in operating income was primarily driven by higher restructuring expenses incurred during the quarter and lower net sales due to weakness in the automotive market.
 
Interest (Income) Expense, Net
 
Interest income, net, was $0.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to $1.4 million of interest expense, net in the same period last year.  Interest income, net, in the quarter included $2.2 million of interest expense and $2.3 million of interest income.  Interest expense, net in the prior year period included interest expense of $3.1 million and interest income of $1.7 million.  Weighted average borrowings outstanding were $439.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to $162.7 million for the same period in the prior year.
 
The weighted average interest rate on our borrowings was 2.0 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to 6.1 percent in the same quarter last year.  The decrease was due to our issuance in October 2008 of the Notes, which have an interest rate of 1.25 percent.
 
Miscellaneous, Net
 
Net miscellaneous expenses were $1.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to $0.7 million in the same period last year.  For each period, miscellaneous expenses were primarily bank charges.
 
Income Tax Expense, Net
 
Income tax expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 was $8.4 million compared to $3.7 million for the same period last year.  The effective tax rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 was 26.5 percent compared to 9.3 percent in the prior year period.  The increase was primarily due to a favorable conclusion of a German tax audit recorded in the prior year.
 
As of September 30, 2008, unrecognized tax benefits and the related interest were $9.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively, all of which would affect the tax rate if recognized.  During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded only interest related to uncertain tax positions of $0.3 million.
 
 
Financial Condition
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
We primarily finance our working capital requirements through cash generated by operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facility and trade credit.  Cash and cash equivalents were $195.1 million at September 30, 2008 compared to $223.1 million at June 30, 2008.  During the three months ended September 30, 2008, cash was used to make investments in our manufacturing facilities and meet the working capital needs of our business segments.
 
We will continue to have cash requirements to support seasonal working capital needs, investments in our manufacturing facilities, interest and principal payments and dividend payments.  We intend to use cash on hand, cash generated by operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility to meet these requirements.  The credit markets have recently experienced adverse conditions.  Our existing cash and cash equivalents may decline and our ability to refinance our existing credit facility may be adversely affected in the event of continued volatility in the capital markets or a further weakening economy.  Notwithstanding these adverse market conditions, we believe that cash from operations and our borrowing capacity, if needed, will be adequate to meet our normal cash requirements over the next twelve months.  Below is a more detailed discussion of our cash flow activities during the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
 
Operating Activities
 
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, our net cash provided by operations was $17.9 million compared to net cash used in operations of $101.6 million in the same period last year.  The increase in operating cash flows was primarily due to a reduction in tax payments, primarily in Germany.  At September 30, 2008, working capital, excluding cash and short-term debt, was $342.0 million, compared with $309.7 million at June 30, 2008.  The increase was primarily due to lower accounts payable and accrued liabilities, partially offset by reductions in accounts receivable.
 
Investing Activities
 
Net cash used in investing activities was $23.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $32.6 million in the same period last year.  Capital expenditures for the three months ended September 30, 2008 were $22.9 million compared to $27.5 million for the same period last year.  Capital spending is lower as the prior year included more significant expenditures relating to the launch of new automotive platforms and a new manufacturing facility in China.  We expect capital expenditures in fiscal 2009 to be below fiscal 2008 levels.
 
Financing Activities
 
Our total debt at September 30, 2008 was $427.0 million, primarily comprised of $25.0 million of borrowings under our revolving credit facility and $400.0 million of the Notes issued in October 2008.  Also included in total debt are capital leases and other borrowings of $2.0 million.
 
We are party to a $300 million committed multi-currency revolving credit facility with a group of banks.  This facility expires in June 2010.   The maximum principal amount of borrowings permitted under the credit facility is $300 million. The credit facility includes our conditional option to increase the maximum aggregate revolving commitment amount to $550 million. At September 30, 2008, we had borrowings of $25.0 million and outstanding letters of credit of $6.0 million under this facility.  Unused availability under the revolving credit facility was $269.0 million at September 30, 2008.
 
On October 23, 2007, we issued $400 million of 1.25 percent Convertible Senior Notes due 2012.  The initial conversion rate is 9.6154 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes (which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $104 per share). The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in specified circumstances as described in the indenture for the Notes.  The Notes are convertible under the specified circumstances set forth in the indenture for the Notes.
 
 
Upon conversion, a holder will receive in respect of each $1,000 of principal amount of Notes to be converted an amount in cash equal to the lesser of (1) $1,000 or (2) the conversion value, determined in the manner set forth in the indenture for the Notes.  If the conversion value per Note exceeds $1,000, we will also deliver, at our election, cash or common stock or a combination of cash and common stock for the conversion value in excess of $1,000.
 
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (“FSP APB 14-1”).  FSP APB 14-1 requires the issuer of convertible debt instruments with cash settlement features to account separately for the liability and equity components of the instrument. The debt would be recognized at the present value of its cash flows discounted using the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance. The equity component would be recognized as the difference between the proceeds from the issuance of the note and the fair value of the liability. FSP APB 14-1 will also require an accretion of the resultant debt discount over the expected life of the debt. The proposed transition guidance requires retrospective application to all periods presented, and does not grandfather existing instruments. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008.  Early adoption is not permitted.  FSP APB 14-1 is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.  We expect the implementation of FSP APB 14-1 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and will result in higher non-cash interest expense for fiscal 2008 through the first half of fiscal 2013 and a corresponding reduction in our reported net income.  We are currently evaluating our non-convertible borrowing rate and the fair value of the conversion privilege with respect to the Notes.
 
Our long-term debt agreements contain financial and other covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, restrict subsidiary dividends and distributions, limit our ability to encumber certain assets and restrict our ability to issue capital stock of our subsidiaries.  Our long-term debt agreements permit us to pay dividends or repurchase our capital stock without any dollar limitation provided that we would be in compliance with the financial covenants in our revolving credit facility after giving effect to such dividend or repurchase.  At September 30, 2008, we were in compliance with the terms of our long-term debt agreements.
 
Equity
 
Total shareholders’ equity at September 30, 2008 was $1.263 billion compared with $1.340 billion at June 30, 2008.  The decrease is primarily due to unfavorable foreign currency translation of $98.8 million, partially offset by net income of $23.2 million.  There were no shares of our common stock repurchased during the three months ended September 30, 2008.
 
Recent Developments
 
As previously announced, on September 22, 2008, Mr. Todd Suko joined the Company as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.  He succeeded Mr. Edwin Summers, who had served as the Company’s General Counsel since 1998.  Mr. Summers will remain with the Company in a senior legal role reporting to Mr. Suko.
 
As previously announced, effective October 1, 2008, the Company appointed Jennifer Peter as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer.  Ms. Peter has served most recently as Vice President, Finance and Administration for the Company’s JBL Professional Unit.
 
As previously announced, on September 2, 2008, the Company announced the launch of a joint engineering center in India with Wipro Limited.  The new Harman India Development Center will operate from Wipro’s existing Bangalore and Chennai facilities, complementing an earlier agreement which outsourced the Company’s global IT infrastructure services to Wipro.
 
 
Business Outlook
 
With the current turmoil in the global credit and financial markets, both investor and consumer confidence has been badly shaken.  Although our first quarter results were not significantly impacted by this economic downturn, our future outlook may be impacted by the contraction in consumer discretionary spending. Our outlook could also be affected by the potential impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates (primarily the Euro compared to the U.S. dollar) which may result in reduced sales.
 
To mitigate the potential impacts of the declining economic markets, we have accelerated many of the strategic initiatives begun in the prior fiscal year.  We continue to focus on improving our global footprint, cost structure, technology portfolio, human resources and internal processes.  Our restructuring actions begun in the prior fiscal year continue.  Also, during the first quarter we successfully completed the definition phase of our 24-month cost improvement and productivity program called STEP Change.  This program is designed to yield $400 million in sustainable savings by 2011.  In addition to the STEP Change program, we have implemented a number of short-term measures to significantly reduce our costs during this difficult fiscal year.  These are the first of multiple actions to improve our cost structure to enable us to remain competitive and achieve results in this challenging environment.
 
 
We are required to include information about potential effects of changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates in our periodic reports filed with the SEC.  Since June 30, 2008, there have been no material changes in the quantitative or qualitative aspects of our market risk profile.  See Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk included in our 2008 Form 10-K.
 
Interest Rate Sensitivity/Risk
 
At September 30, 2008, interest on approximately 94 percent of our borrowings was determined on a fixed rate basis.  The interest rates on the balance of our debt are subject to changes in U.S. and European short-term interest rates.  To assess exposure to interest rate changes, we have performed a sensitivity analysis assuming a hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates across all outstanding debt and investments.  Our analysis indicates that the effect on net income at September 30, 2008 of such an increase or decrease in interest rates would be approximately $0.3 million.
 
Foreign Currency Risk
 
We maintain significant operations in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Austria, Hungary, Mexico, China and Switzerland.  As a result, we are subject to market risks arising from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, principally the change in the value of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar.  Our subsidiaries purchase products and raw materials in various currencies.  As a result, we may be exposed to the cost changes relative to local currencies in the markets to which we sell our products.  To mitigate these transactional risks, we enter into foreign exchange contracts.  Also, foreign currency positions are partially offsetting and are netted against one another to reduce exposure.
 
Changes in currency exchange rates, principally the change in the value of the Euro compared to the U.S. dollar, have an impact on our reported results when the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars.  Over half of our sales are denominated in Euros.  The fluctuation in currency exchange rates, specifically the Euro versus the U.S. dollar, had a significant impact on earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same prior year period due to the strengthening of the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar.  The average exchange rate for the Euro versus the U.S. dollar for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased 9.3 percent from the same period in the prior year.  In recent months, the U.S. dollar has strengthened against the Euro.  To the extent the U.S. dollar continues to strengthen against the Euro, our results of operations may be negatively affected.
 
To assess exposure to changes in currency exchange rates, we prepared an analysis assuming a hypothetical 10 percent change in currency exchange rates across all currencies used by our subsidiaries.  This analysis indicated that a 10 percent increase or decrease in exchange rates would have increased or decreased income before income taxes by approximately $4.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
 
 
Competitive conditions in the markets in which we operate may limit our ability to increase prices in the event of adverse changes in currency exchange rates.  For example, certain products made in Europe are sold in the U.S.  Sales of these products are affected by the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro.  Any weakening of the U.S. dollar could depress the demand for these European manufactured products in the U.S. and reduce sales.  However, due to the multiple currencies involved in our business and the netting effect of various simultaneous transactions, our foreign currency positions are partially offsetting.  In addition, our foreign currency hedging program is designed to limit our exposure.  
 
Actual gains and losses in the future may differ materially from the hypothetical gains and losses discussed above based on changes in the timing and amount of interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate movements and our actual exposure and hedging transactions.
 
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.  We note that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving our stated goals under all potential future conditions.
 
Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) as promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
Part II. 
OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  
 
In re Harman International Industries, Inc. Securities Litigation
 
On October 1, 2007, a purported class action lawsuit was filed by Cheolan Kim (the “Kim Plaintiff”) against the Company and certain of its officers in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking compensatory damages and costs on behalf of all persons who purchased the Company’s common stock between April 26, 2007 and September 24, 2007 (the “Class Period”).  The original complaint purported to allege claims for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
 
The complaint alleged that defendants omitted to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s financial condition and business prospects.  The complaint contended that had these facts not been concealed at the time the merger agreement with KKR and GSCP was entered, there would not have been a merger agreement, or it would have been at a much lower price, and the price of the Company’s common stock therefore would not have been artificially inflated during the Class Period.  The Kim Plaintiff alleged that, following the reports that the proposed merger was not going to be completed, the price of the Company’s common stock declined, causing the plaintiff class significant losses.
 
 
On November 30, 2007, the Boca Raton General Employees’ Pension Plan (the “Boca Raton Plaintiff”) filed a purported class action lawsuit against the Company and certain of its officers in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking compensatory damages and costs on behalf of all persons who purchased the Company’s common stock between April 26, 2007 and September 24, 2007.  The allegations in the Boca complaint are essentially identical to the allegations in the original Kim complaint, and like the original Kim complaint, the Boca complaint alleges claims for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
 
On January 16, 2008, the Kim Plaintiff filed an amended complaint.  The amended complaint, which extended the Class Period through January 11, 2008, contended that, in addition to the violations alleged in the original complaint, the Company also violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) and Rule 10b-5 by knowingly failing to disclose “significant problems” relating to its PND sales forecasts, production, pricing, and inventory” prior to January 14, 2008.  The amended complaint claimed that when “Defendants revealed for the first time on January 14, 2008 that shifts in PND sales would adversely impact earnings per share by more than $1.00 per share in fiscal 2008,” that led to a further decline in the Company’s share value and additional losses to the plaintiff class.
 
On February 15, 2008, the Court ordered the consolidation of the Kim action with the Boca action, the administrative closing of Boca, and designated the short caption of the consolidated action as In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation, civil action no. 1:07-cv-01757 (RWR).  That same day, the Court appointed Arkansas Public Retirement System as Lead Plaintiff and approved the law firm Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld and Toll, P.L.L.C. to serve as Lead Counsel.
 
On March 24, 2008, the Court ordered, for pretrial management purposes only, the consolidation of Patrick Russell v. Harman International Industries, Incorporated, et al. with In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation.
 
On May 2, 2008, Lead Plaintiff filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the “Consolidated Complaint”).  The Consolidated Complaint, which extends the Class Period through February 5, 2008, contends that the Company and certain of its officers and directors violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) and Rule 10b-5 by issuing false and misleading disclosures regarding the Company’s financial condition in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008.  In particular, the Consolidated Complaint alleges that defendants knowingly or recklessly failed to disclose material adverse facts about MyGIG radios, PNDs and the Company’s capital expenditures.  The Consolidated Complaint alleges that when the Company’s true financial condition became known to the market, the price of the Company’s stock declined significantly, causing losses to the plaintiff class.
 
On July 3, 2008, defendants moved to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint in its entirety.  Lead Plaintiff opposed defendants’ motion to dismiss on September 2, 2008, and defendants filed a reply in further support of their motion to dismiss on October 2, 2008.  The motion is now fully briefed.
 
We believe the lawsuit, which is still in its earliest stages, is without merit and we intend to vigorously defend against it.
 
Patrick Russell v. Harman International Industries, Incorporated, et al.
 
Patrick Russell (the “Russell Plaintiff”) filed a complaint on December 7, 2007 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and an amended purported putative class action complaint on June 2, 2008 against the Company and certain of its officers and directors alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and seeking, on behalf of all participants in and beneficiaries of the Harman International Industries, Incorporated Retirement Savings Plan  (the “Plan”), compensatory damages for losses to the Plan as well as injunctive relief, imposition of a constructive trust, restitution, and other monetary relief.  The amended complaint alleges that from April 26, 2007 to the present, defendants failed to prudently and loyally manage the Plan’s assets, thereby breaching their fiduciary duties in violation of ERISA, by causing the Plan to invest in Company stock notwithstanding that the stock allegedly was “no longer a prudent investment for the Participants’ retirement savings.”  The amended complaint further claims that, during the Class Period, defendants failed to monitor the Plan fiduciaries, and failed to provide the Plan fiduciaries with, and to disclose to Plan participants, adverse facts regarding the Company and its businesses and prospects.  The Russell Plaintiff also contends that defendants breached their duties to avoid conflicts of interest and to serve the interests of participants in and beneficiaries of the Plan with undivided loyalty.  As a result of these alleged fiduciary breaches, the complaint asserts that the Plan has “suffered substantial losses, resulting in the depletion of millions of dollars of the retirement savings and anticipated retirement income of the Plan’s Participants.”
 
 
On March 24, 2008, the Court ordered, for pretrial management purposes only, the consolidation of Patrick Russell v. Harman International Industries, Incorporated, et al. with In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation.
 
Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint in its entirety on August 5, 2008.  Plaintiff opposed defendants’ motion to dismiss on September 19, 2008, and defendants filed a reply in further support of their motion to dismiss on October 20, 2008.  The motion is now fully briefed.
 
We believe the lawsuit, which is still in its earliest stages, is without merit and we intend to vigorously defend against it.
 
Siemens vs. Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH.
 
In October 2006, Harman Becker received notice of a complaint filed by Siemens AG against it with the Regional Court in Düsseldorf in August 2006 alleging that certain of Harman Becker’s infotainment products including both radio receiver and Bluetooth hands free telephony functionality, infringe upon a patent owned by Siemens.  In November 2006 Harman Becker filed suit with the German Federal Patent Court in Munich to nullify the claims of this patent.
 
On August 14, 2007, the court of first instance in Düsseldorf ruled that the patent in question had been infringed and ordered Harman Becker to cease selling the products in question in Germany, and to compile and submit data to Siemens concerning its prior sales of such products.  Harman Becker has appealed that ruling.
 
Despite the pending appeal, Siemens AG provisionally enforced the ruling against Harman Becker.  Accordingly, Harman Becker ceased selling aftermarket products covered by the patent in Germany, and submitted the required data to Siemens AG.
 
On June 4, 2008, the German Federal Patent Court nullified all relevant claims of Siemens’ patent.  As a result, Harman Becker resumed selling the affected products, and Siemens suspended further attempts to enforce the patent.  Siemens also requested that Harman Becker suspend its appeal of the Düsseldorf court’s ruling of infringement until the German Federal Patent Court’s nullity ruling has become final.  Harman has consented to this suspension.  Harman Becker received the written decision of the German Federal Patent Court on August 18, 2008, and Siemens has appealed the decision to the German Federal Supreme Court. We expect these appellate proceedings to take at least three years until a final decision is rendered.
 
We intend to continue vigorously defending this lawsuit.
 
While the outcome of any of the legal proceedings described above cannot at this time be predicted with certainty, we do not expect these matters will materially affect our financial condition or results of operations.
 
 
Other Legal Actions
 
At September 30, 2008, we were involved in several other legal actions.  The outcome of these legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty; however, management, based upon advice from legal counsel, believes such actions are either without merit or will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
 
Item 1A.   Risk Factors
 
The risk factors included in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 are updated to include the following:
 
The current economic environment may adversely affect the availability and cost of credit and consumer spending patterns.
 
Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our obligations with respect to indebtedness will depend on our operating and financial performance, which in turn is subject to prevailing economic conditions.  The subprime mortgage crisis and disruptions in the financial markets, including the bankruptcy and restructuring of major financial institutions, may adversely impact the availability of credit already arranged, and the availability and cost of credit in the future.  The disruptions in the financial markets may also have an adverse effect on the United States and world economy, which could negatively impact consumer spending patterns. This could result in reductions in sales of our products, longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and increased price competition.  There can be no assurances that government responses to the disruptions in the financial markets will restore consumer confidence, stabilize the markets or increase liquidity and the availability of credit.
 
 
We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock in the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
 
For a description of limitations on repurchases of shares and on the payment of dividends, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition” located in Item 2 of Part I of this report.

 
Item 6.  Exhibits
 
Exhibit No.
Exhibit Description
   
Letter Agreement, dated August 22, 2008, between Harman International Industries, Incorporated and Todd Suko.
   
Form of Harman International Industries, Incorporated 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan Performance Based Restricted Share Unit Agreement for Officers and Key Employees.
   
Summary of equity awards granted to Mr. Paliwal and Mr. Parker in September 2008.
   
Certification of Dinesh Paliwal pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
Certification of Herbert Parker pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
Certification of Dinesh Paliwal and Herbert Parker, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
SIGNATURES
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Harman International Industries, Incorporated has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
   
Harman International Industries, Incorporated
     
     
Date:  November 10, 2008
 
By:/s/ Herbert Parker
   
Herbert Parker
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
   
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
35


Exhibit 10.1

[HARMAN LETTERHEAD]
 
 
August 22, 2008
 
 
Mr. Todd A. Suko
[Address Omitted]


Dear Todd:
 
On behalf of Harman International Industries, Incorporated (“Harman”), I would like to submit an offer to you for the position of General Counsel.  In this capacity you will report directly to me.  You will be located at our Stamford, Connecticut office.  This offer provides the following:
 
Start Date :  Your start date will be October 1, 2008 or an earlier date if possible.
 
Base Salary :  Your annual base salary will be $350,000, subject to annual review commencing on September 1, 2009, and payable in accordance with our regular payroll schedule in Stamford, CT.
 
Bonus :  Beginning with fiscal year 2009, you will be eligible to participate in the Management Incentive Compensation (MIC) program with a target bonus opportunity equal to 65% of your base salary and a 97.5% maximum.  This bonus program is based upon Harman’s achievement of its business plan, as well as your achievement of personal performance goals.
 
Stock Options :  You will receive on your start date a one-time stock option award of 25,000 shares of Harman common stock under the terms of the Plan at a per share exercise price equal to the fair market value on the grant date.  The option will vest 20% per year over five years commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date, with acceleration and other provisions as provided in the Plan and your option agreement.  You will also be eligible for a stock option grant at the next general grant, at a level commensurate with your position.
 
Restricted Stock :  You will receive a one-time award of 5,000 shares of restricted Harman common stock under the Plan, vesting on October 1, 2011, if you are employed by Harman on that date.

 
 

 

Severance :  If your employment is terminated by Harman without “Cause” within the first year of employment, you will receive one year of salary continuation and company-paid COBRA benefits during the salary continuation period.  Subject to the approval of the Compensation and Option Committee of the Board of Directors, your initial stock option grants and restricted stock award will vest upon such termination and you would have ninety (90) days thereafter within which to exercise, in accordance with the terms of the Plan, those stock options that are vested as of the Termination Date.  “Cause” is defined in Attachment A attached hereto.  Such payments will be subject to the execution by you of a release substantially in the form attached hereto as Attachment B .  Your salary continuation payments would commence on the 60 th day after your termination of employment; provided, however, that if on the due date for any salary continuation payment, all revocation periods have not then expired with respect to your release, such payment will be forfeited.
 
Company Car :  You will have use of a company-leased automobile, with a lease payment of approximately $1,500 per month.  Harman will bear the car expenses ( i.e. , gasoline, insurance, car tax, repairs) associated with the business use of the company car.  You may use the company car for private purposes, however taxes imposed with respect to private usage will be borne by you.
 
Vacation :  You will be eligible for accrual of three (3) weeks of vacation annually, pro-rated for 2008 based on your start date.
 
Other Benefits :  Additional benefits, as defined by Company policy and governing plan documents, currently include medical, dental, vision, life insurance, short and long-term disability insurance, tuition reimbursement, 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan and all Company-paid holidays.  Eligibility to participate in these benefits commences thirty (30) days after your date of hire, except for the 401(k) plan under which participation is available on the first plan enrollment date following 180 days of employment.
 
Section 409A :  For purposes of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, each salary continuation payment and Company-paid COBRA benefit will be considered one of a series of separate payments.  If at the time of your separation from service (within the meaning of Section 409A), (i) you are a specified employee (within the meaning of Section 409A and using the identification methodology selected by Harman from time to time) and (ii) Harman makes a good faith determination that an amount payable hereunder constitutes deferred compensation (within the meaning of Section 409A) the payment of which is required to be delayed pursuant to the six-month delay rule set forth in Section 409A in order to avoid taxes or penalties under Section 409A, then Harman will not pay such amount on the otherwise scheduled payment date but will instead pay it, without interest, on the first business day after such six-month period, subject to the release requirements noted above.  To the extent that there is a material risk that any payments under this letter or any grant may result in the imposition of an additional tax to you under Section 409A, the company will reasonably cooperate with you to amend this letter and related documents such that such documents and payments thereunder comply with Section 409A without materially changing the economic value of this letter or the arrangements hereunder to either party.
 
The Company will, in connection with your employment, withhold from any compensation and benefits payable to you all federal, state, city and other taxes as requested by you or that the Company is required to withhold pursuant to any law or government regulation or ruling.  Harman is not hereby offering you lifetime employment or employment for a fixed or implied period of time.  Either you or Harman may terminate your employment at any time, with or without cause or notice.  The at-will nature of your employment relationship cannot be changed except in a written document signed by you and me.  Upon termination of your employment, Harman will have no further obligations to you under this letter agreement except to the extent provided under “Severance” above.

 
- 2 -

 

Any dispute concerning termination of your employment shall be resolved by final and binding arbitration before a neutral arbitrator.  The arbitrator shall be selected by mutual agreement or in accordance with the procedures of the American Arbitration Association and the employment arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association shall apply.  Such arbitration shall be conducted in Stamford, Connecticut or such other location as to which you and Harman agree.  The law of Connecticut, without regard to its choice of law rules, shall govern any such dispute, and the arbitrator shall not have authority to vary or alter the terms of this letter.
 
You will be expected to sign the Company’s standard form of Invention and Secrecy Agreement on your start date.
 
Your acceptance of this offer and subsequent employment at Harman will be conditional upon Harman’s receipt of an acceptable background screening report which must be completed prior to your start date.  Upon your acceptance of this offer you will be contacted by human resources related to the background screening process.
 
You acknowledge and agree that your acceptance of this offer will violate no agreements or arrangements with other individuals or entities, or duties to your current employer.  Please sign and return the original of this letter.  You should retain one copy of this letter for your files.
 
I look forward to working with you and welcome the contributions you will bring to this outstanding company.
 
 
Best regards,
 
/s/ Dinesh C. Paliwal
 
Dinesh C. Paliwal
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Harman International

 
- 3 -

 

I accept your offer of employment and agree to the provisions stated in this letter.   I acknowledge and agree that this letter constitutes the entire agreement between Harman and me and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements, arrangements or understandings pertaining to my offer of employment.  I understand that I am employed at will and that my employment can be terminated at any time, with or without cause, at the option of either the Company or me.

 
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
 
 
/s/ Todd A. Suko
 
September 2, 2008
 
Todd A. Suko
 
Date
 

 
- 4 -

 

Attachment  “A”
 
Termination Definitions
 
“Cause” means:
 
 
(i)
You have been convicted of a felony; or
 
 
(ii)
You have engaged in conduct that constitutes willful gross neglect or willful gross misconduct with respect to your employment duties which results in material economic harm to Harman, as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors in its reasonable discretion.

 
- 5 -

 

Attachment “B”
 
SAMPLE RELEASE (“Release”)
 
In consideration of the agreement by Harman International Industries, Inc. (the “Company” or “Employer”) to provide the benefits described in the above agreement between me and the Company dated __________ (the “Agreement”) and in consideration for the Company’s other promises in the Agreement and herein, I agree as follows:
 
1.
Release of Known and Unknown Claims by Me .
 
 
a)
I hereby release and forever discharge the Company and each of its associates, owners, stockholders, affiliates, divisions, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors, heirs, assigns, agents, directors, officers, partners, employees, representatives, and insurers (collectively, the “Company Releasees”) of and from any and all manner of action or actions, cause or causes of actions, in law or in equity, suits, debts, liens, contracts, agreements, promises, liabilities, claims, demands, damages, loss, cost or expense, of any nature whatsoever, known or unknown, fixed or contingent, which I now have or may have against the Company or any Company Releasee to the extent acting by, through, under or in concert with the Company, by reason of any matter, cause or thing whatsoever from the beginning of time to the Effective Date.  The claims released herein include, without limitation, claims arising out of, based upon, or relating to the hire, employment, remuneration or termination of my employment and any claims constituting, arising out of, based upon, or relating to any tort theory, any express or implied contract, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights of 1866, the Civil Rights Act of 1991, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (29 U.S.C. §§621 et seq.), the Equal Pay Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and any other local, state or federal law governing the employment relationship.  Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, nothing herein or otherwise shall release the Company from any claims, rights or damages that I may have (i) under the Agreement or this Release; (ii) as a stockholder in the Company; or (iii) that may not be released or waived as a matter of law.
 
 
b)
I expressly acknowledge, agree and recite that (i) the release and waiver set forth in subsection 1(a) above are written in a manner I understand; (ii) in executing this Release, I am not waiving rights or claims that may arise after the date that this Release becomes effective; (iii) I am waiving rights or claims only in exchange for consideration in addition to anything to which I am otherwise entitled; (iv) I have entered into and executed this Release knowingly and voluntarily; (v) I have read and understand this Release in its entirety; and (vi) I have not been forced to sign this Release by any employee or agent of Employer.
 
 
c)
I represent and warrant that there has been no assignment or other transfer of any interest in any claims released hereunder, and I agree to indemnify and hold the Company Releasees harmless from any liability, claims, demands, damages, reasonable costs, reasonable expenses and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by the Company Releasees as a result of any person asserting any such assignment or transfer.  It is the intention of the parties that this indemnity does not require payment as a condition precedent to recovery by the Company Releasees against me under this indemnity.

 
- 6 -

 

 
d)
I agree that, except for claims made to or brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), if I hereafter commence, join in, or in any manner seek relief through any suit arising out of, based upon or relating to any of the claims released hereunder, or in any manner assert against the Company Releasees any of the claims released hereunder, I shall pay to the Company Releasees in addition to any other damages caused to the Company Releasees thereby, all reasonable attorneys fees incurred by the Company Releasees in defending or otherwise responding to said suit or claim.
 
 
e)
It is my intention that my execution of this Release will forever bar every claim, demand, cause of action, charge and grievance released above.
 
2.
Assumption of Risk .  Each of the parties fully understands that if any fact with respect to any matter covered by this Release is found hereafter to be other than, or different from, the facts now believed by any of the parties to be true, each of the parties expressly accepts and assumes the risk of such possible difference in fact and agrees that the release provisions hereof shall be and remain effective notwithstanding any such difference in fact.
 
3.
No Pending Actions .  I represent that I do not presently have on file any complaint, charge or claim (civil, administrative or criminal) against the Company in any court or administrative forum, or before any governmental agency or entity.  I represent that I will not hereafter file any complaints, charges or claims (civil, administrative or criminal) against the Company with any administrative, state, federal or other governmental entity, agency, board or court (except the EEOC) with respect to the claims released in Section 1 above.
 
4.
Proprietary and Privileged Information .  I agree and acknowledge that during the course of my employment with Company, I received confidential and/or proprietary information relating to, without limitation, Company and its subsidiaries’ and affiliates’ business and marketing strategies, finances, benefit plans, systems, products and employees.  I agree on the date upon which I sign this Release to return to the Company any and all documents, papers and material (including any of the same stored on electronic media such as diskettes or tapes) containing such confidential and/or proprietary information which has not theretofore been returned to the Company, although I may retain the laptop computer as provided in the Agreement.  I further agree that, following my signing of this Release and for so long thereafter as such information is not in the public domain through no fault of mine, I will not use or disclose any such confidential and/or proprietary information, either directly or indirectly, to or for the benefit of any other person, firm or corporation.  The provisions of this Section 4 supplement, but do not replace, my legal and other contractual obligations (if any) relating to confidential Company information.
 
5.
No Admission of Liability .  I understand and agree that neither the execution of this Release nor the performance of any term hereof shall constitute or be construed as an admission of any liability whatsoever by either the Company or me, as both the Company and I have consistently taken the position that it/I have no liability whatsoever to the other.
 
6.
Confidentiality .  The terms and conditions of this Release shall be kept confidential by the Company as well as by me; provided , that it shall not be a breach of this Release for me to present this Release under seal to any court called upon to enforce it, and, so long as such disclosure is accompanied by a warning that the recipient must keep the information confidential, it also shall not be a breach of this Release for me to disclose any part of this Release or the information contained herein to a member of my immediate family or to my legal counsel or tax or financial advisor(s); provided further , that it shall not be a breach of this Release for me to comply with a valid court order or subpoena requiring the disclosure of any information about this Release, or as otherwise required by law.

 
- 7 -

 

7.
Arbitration .  The parties hereby agree to submit any claim or dispute arising out of the terms of the Agreement or this Release to private and confidential arbitration by a single neutral arbitrator.  Subject to the terms of this paragraph, the arbitration proceedings shall be governed by the then current Rules of the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) and shall be conducted in New York, N.Y., or such other location upon which Company and I agree.  The arbitrator shall be appointed by agreement of the Company and me or, if no agreement can be reached within two weeks of the matter’s first submission to the AAA, by the AAA pursuant to its Rules.  The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the Company and me, and judgment thereon may be entered in any court having jurisdiction.  All costs of the arbitration proceeding, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and witness expenses, shall be paid by the party against whom the arbitrator rules.  This arbitration procedure is intended to be the exclusive method of resolving any claim for breach of the Agreement or this Release; provided , however, that nothing in this Section 7 shall prohibit either the Company or me from requesting a court of law to issue any injunction to prohibit future breaches of Section 4 or any obligation referred to in the last sentence of Section 4.  This Release and the Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York (excluding the choice of law rules thereof).
 
8.
Attorneys’ Fees .  If the Company or I bring an action or proceeding for breach of the Agreement or this Release or to enforce its or my rights hereunder or thereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including court and/or arbitration costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, if any, incurred in connection with such action.
 
9.
Return of Employer Property .  I represent that I have returned to the Company all Company products, samples, equipment, parts, inventory, manuals, technical information and other Company materials in my possession or under my control, except those with respect to which I have made arrangements with the Company to pick up or otherwise deliver to the Company and except as otherwise provided in the Agreement.  Company’s receipt of all such items which I am obligated to return is a condition of its obligation to provide me the benefits described in the above Agreement.
 
10.
Construction of Agreement and Release .  The Agreement and this Release shall be construed as a whole in accordance with their fair meaning and in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.  Neither the language of the Agreement nor that of this Release shall be construed for or against any particular party, solely by reason of authorship.  Each and every covenant, term, provision and agreement herein contained shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.  The headings used herein and in the Agreement are for reference only and shall not affect the construction of any of them.
 
11.
Sole Agreement .  The Agreement, this Release, and the obligations referred to in the last sentence of Section 4 above (if any), represent the sole and entire agreement between the parties and supersede all prior agreements, negotiations and discussions between the parties and/or their respective counsel with respect to the subject matters covered hereby.

 
- 8 -

 

12.
Severability .  In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in the Agreement and this Release shall, for any reason, by held to be invalid, void, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, voidness, illegality or lack of enforceability shall not affect any other provision of the Agreement or this Release, as the case may be, and the remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect.
 
13.
Amendment to Agreement .
 
 
a)
Any amendment or modification of the Agreement or this Release must be made in a writing signed by me and a duly authorized representative of the Company and stating the intent of both parties to amend the Agreement or the Release, as applicable.
 
 
b)
Notices .  All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder must be in writing, marked “Personal and Confidential,” and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered by hand or mailed by first class, postage and registry fees prepaid, and addressed as follows:
 
 
(1)
If to Employee:
XXXXXX
       
 
(2)
If to Company:
Attn:  Chief Executive Officer
     
Harman International Industries, Inc.
       
     
400 Atlantic Street, 15th Floor
       
     
Stamford, CT 06901
 
14.
Revocation; Effectiveness .  I understand that I have the right to revoke this Release within seven (7) calendar days after I sign it.  This Release will become effective and enforceable only after I have signed it and upon expiration of the seven-day revocation period with no revocation taking place (the “Effective Date”).  I understand that if I desire to revoke this Release, I must give actual, written notice of revocation to the above person at the above address before the seven-day revocation period expires.
 
The date indicated and my signature below acknowledge my review, understanding and full, knowing and voluntary acceptance of the terms and conditions set forth in this Release.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, intending to be legally bound hereby, have executed this Release.
 
       
XXXXXXXXX (“Employee”, “me”, or “I”)
 
Date
 

 
- 9 -


Exhibit 10.2
 
 
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED

2002 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
PERFORMANCE BASED RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT AGREEMENT
FOR OFFICERS AND KEY EMPLOYEES

THIS RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of ____________, is entered into between HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and ____________ (“Grantee”).  Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meanings assigned to those terms in the Company’s 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)

W I T N E S S E T H:

A.            Grantee is ____________ an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary of the Company; and

B.             The execution of this Agreement in the form hereof has been authorized by the Compensation and Option Committee of the Board (the “Committee”);

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and the covenants and agreements set forth in this Agreement, the Company and Grantee agree as follows:

1.
Grant of Restricted Share Units .  Subject to and upon the terms, conditions, and restrictions set forth in this Agreement and in the Plan, the Company hereby grants to the Grantee, ____________ Restricted Share Units, (the “Grant”).  Each Restricted Share Unit shall represent the right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”).  This Agreement constitutes an “Evidence of Award” under the Plan.

2.
Date of Grant .  The effective date of the grant of the Restricted Share Units is ____________ (the “Date of Grant”).

3.
Restrictions on Transfer of Restricted Share Units .  Neither the Restricted Share Units granted hereby nor any interest therein shall be transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

4.
Vesting of Restricted Share Units .

 
(a)
Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the number of Restricted Share Units that shall become nonforfeitable (“Earned RSUs”) on the third anniversary of the Date of Grant shall be the number of Restricted Share Units indicated in Section 1 above, subject to adjustment based upon the Company’s achievement of the performance goals as described on Exhibit A , over the three-year period beginning on July 1, 2008 and ending on June 30, 2011.

 
 

 

 
(b)
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4(a) above, all Restricted Share Units shall become immediately nonforfeitable upon the occurrence of a Change in Control (as defined below).  A “Change in Control” means the occurrence, before this Agreement terminates, of any of the following events:

 
(i)
the acquisition by any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) (a “Person”) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 25% or more of the combined voting power of the then outstanding securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Voting Shares”); provided, however, that for purposes of this Section 4(b)(i), the following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change in Control:  (A) any issuance of Voting Shares directly from the Company that is approved by the Incumbent Board (as defined in Section 4(b)(ii) below), (B) any acquisition by the Company or a Subsidiary of Voting Shares, (C) any acquisition of Voting Shares by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any Subsidiary or (D) any acquisition of Voting Shares by any Person pursuant to a Business Combination that complies with clauses (A), (B) and (C) of Section 4(b)(iii) below;

 
(ii)
individuals who, as of the date hereof, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; provided, however, that any individual becoming a Director after the date hereof whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Directors then constituting the Incumbent Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for director, without objection to such nomination) shall be deemed to have been a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest (within the meaning of Rule 14a-12 of the Exchange Act) with respect to the election or removal of Directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board;

 
(iii)
consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation, a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or other transaction (each, a “Business Combination”), unless, in each case, immediately following the Business Combination, (A) all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners of Voting Shares immediately prior to the Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding Voting Shares of the entity resulting from the Business Combination (including, without limitation, an entity which as a result of such transaction owns the Company or all or substantially all of the Company’s assets either directly or through one or more subsidiaries), (B) no Person (other than the Company, such entity resulting from the Business Combination, or any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company, any Subsidiary or such entity resulting from the Business Combination) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the combined voting power of the then outstanding Voting Shares of the entity resulting from the Business Combination and (C) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the entity resulting from the Business Combination were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement or of the action of the Board providing for the Business Combination; or

 
 

 

 
(iv)
approval by the stockholders of the Company of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company, except pursuant to a Business Combination that complies with clauses (A), (B) and (C) of Section 4(b)(iii) hereof.

5.
Forfeiture of Restricted Share Units.

 
(a)
Except as otherwise described in this Section 5, any of the Restricted Share Units that remain forfeitable in accordance with Section 4 hereof shall be forfeited if Grantee ceases for any reason to be employed by the Company or a Subsidiary at any time prior to such shares becoming nonforfeitable in accordance with Section 4 hereof, unless the Committee determines to provide otherwise at the time of the cessation of Grantee’s employment.   For the purposes of this Agreement, the Grantee’s employment with the Company or a Subsidiary shall not be deemed to have been interrupted, and Grantee shall not be deemed to have ceased to be an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary, by reason of (i) the transfer of Grantee’s employment among the Company and its Subsidiaries, (ii) an approved leave of absence of not more than 90 days, or (iii) the period of any leave of absence required to be granted by the Company under any law, rule, regulation or contract applicable to Grantee’s employment with the Company or any Subsidiary.

 
(b)
Any of the Restricted Share Units that remain forfeitable in accordance with Section 4 shall be forfeited on the date that the Committee determines that such Restricted Share Unites shall be forfeited under the circumstances described in Section 17(g) of the Plan.

6.
Payment of Restricted Share Units .  At such time as the Restricted Share Units shall become nonforfeitable as specified in this Agreement, shares of Common Stock underlying such Restricted Share Units shall be transferred to the Grantee, except as otherwise provided in Section 8[; provided, however, that the Committee, in its sole discretion, may settle the award of Restricted Share Units wholly, or partly in cash].

 
 

 

7.
Dividend, Voting and Other Rights .  The Grantee shall have no rights of ownership in the Restricted Share Units and shall have no voting rights with respect to such Restricted Share Units until the date on which the shares of Common Stock are transferred to the Grantee pursuant to Section 6 above and a stock certificate representing such shares of Common Stock is issued to the Grantee.  From and after the Date of Grant and until the earlier of (a) the time when the Grantee receives the shares of Common Stock underlying the Restricted Share Units in accordance with Section 6 hereof or (b) the time when the Grantee’s right to receive the Restricted Share Units is forfeited in accordance with Section 5 hereof, the Company shall not pay to the Grantee any dividends with respect to the Restricted Share Units.

8.
Retention of Common Stock by the Company .  The shares of Common Stock underlying the Restricted Share Units shall be released to the Grantee by the Company’s transfer agent at the direction of the Company.  At such time as the Restricted Share Units become nonforfeitable as specified in this Agreement, the Company shall direct the transfer agent to forward all such nonforfeitable shares of Common Stock to the Grantee except in the event that the Grantee has notified the Company of his or her election to satisfy any tax obligations by surrender of a portion of such shares, the transfer agent will be directed to forward the remaining balance of shares after the amount necessary for such taxes has been deducted.

9.
Compliance with Law .  The Company shall make reasonable efforts to comply with all applicable federal and state securities laws; provided, however, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Company shall not be obligated to issue any shares of Common Stock or other securities pursuant to this Agreement if the issuance thereof would, in the reasonable opinion of the Company, result in a violation of any such law.

10.
Compliance with Section 409A of the Code .  To the extent applicable, it is intended that this Agreement and the Plan comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, so that the income inclusion provisions of Section 409A(a)(1) do not apply to Grantee.  This Agreement and the Plan shall be administered in a manner consistent with this intent.

11.
Relation to Other Benefits .  Any economic or other benefit to the Grantee under this Agreement shall not be taken into account in determining any benefits to which the Grantee may be entitled.

12.
Relation to Plan .  This Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.  In the event of any inconsistent provisions between this Agreement and the Plan, the Plan shall govern.  Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan.  The Committee, acting pursuant to the Plan shall, except as expressly provided otherwise herein, have the right to determine any questions which arise in connection with this grant.

13.
Employment Rights .  This Agreement shall not confer on Grantee any right with respect to the continuance of employment or other services with the Company or any Subsidiary.  No provision of this Agreement shall limit in any way whatsoever any right that the Company or a Subsidiary may otherwise have to terminate the employment of Grantee at any time.

 
 

 

14.
Communications .  All notices, demands and other communications required or permitted hereunder or designated to be given with respect to the rights or interests covered by this Agreement shall be deemed to have been properly given or delivered when delivered personally or sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, U.S. mail or reputable overnight carrier, with full postage prepaid and addressed to the parties as follows:

If to the Company, at:
400 Atlantic Blvd., 15 th Floor
Stamford, CT  06901
Attention:  Vice President-Financial Operations

 
If to Grantee, at:
Grantee’s address provided by Grantee on the last page hereof

Either the Company or Grantee may change the above designated address by written notice to the other specifying such new address.

15.
Interpretation .  The interpretation and construction of this Agreement by the Committee shall be final and conclusive.  No member of the Committee shall be liable for any such action or determination made in good faith.

16.
Amendment in Writing .  This Agreement may be amended as provided in the Plan; provided, however, that all such amendments shall be in writing.

17.
Integration .  The Restricted Share Units are granted pursuant to the Plan.  Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement is subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Plan, a copy of which is available upon request and which is incorporated herein by reference.  As such, this Agreement and the Plan embody the entire agreement and understanding of the Company and Grantee and supersede any prior understandings or agreements, whether written or oral, with respect to the Restricted Share Units.

18.
Severance .  In the event that one or more of the provisions of this Agreement shall be invalidated for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, any provision so invalidated shall be deemed to be separable from the other provisions hereof and the remaining provisions hereof shall continue to be valid and fully enforceable.

19.
Governing Law .  This Agreement is made under, and shall be construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware.

20.
Counterparts .  This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

 
 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed by a duly authorized representative of the Company on the day and year first above written.

 
HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES,
 
INCORPORATED
     
 
By:
 
     
 
Name:
 
 
Title:
 

The undersigned Grantee acknowledges receipt of an executed original of this Agreement and accepts the Restricted Share Units subject to the applicable terms and conditions of the Plan and the terms and conditions hereinabove set forth.

Date:
       
     
Grantee
 

GRANTEE:           Please complete/update the following information.
Name:
   
     
Home Address:
   
     
     
     
     
     
Social Security Number:
   
     
Date of Hire:
   

Subsidiary or Division:           ______

 
 

 

EXHIBIT A

Performance Goals

Upon vesting, the number of Earned RSUs shall be determined as follows:

(a) Operating Income .  Of the Restricted Share Units subject to the Grant (the “Grant RSUs”), 50% will be subject to adjustment based on the Company’s operating income for fiscal 2011 (the “Operating Income”), as reported in the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The performance target for Operating Income is $478,050,000 (the “Target Operating Income”).  None of the Grant RSUs subject to adjustment based on Operating Income will be payable if Operating Income is below $223,388,250 (the “Threshold Operating Income”), which represents 25% of the difference between the Target Operating Income and the Company’s fiscal 2008 operating income.  The number of Earned RSUs based on Operating Income shall be determined as follows:

(i) if Operating Income is below the Threshold Operating Income, 50% of the Grant RSUs will be cancelled;

(ii) if Operating Income is at the Threshold Operating Income, the Earned RSUs shall include 12.5% of the Grant RSUs;

(iii) if Operating Income is at or above Target Operating Income, the Earned RSUs shall include 50% of the Grant RSUs; and

(iv) if Operating Income is above the Threshold Operating Income and below the Target Operating Income, the Earned RSUs shall include a number of the Grant RSUs to be determined by straight-line interpolation between 12.5% and 50% of the Grant RSUs based on the Operating Income relative to the Threshold Operating Income and the Target Operating Income.

(b) Global Footprint Index .  Of the Grant RSUs, 50% will be subject to adjustment based on an index equal to the sum of (1) the percentage of the Company’s capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 in lower cost countries, (2) the percentage of the Company’s sourcing in lower cost countries in fiscal 2011 and (3) the percentage of the Company’s employees in lower cost countries in fiscal 2011 (the “Global Footprint Index”).  The performance target for the Global Footprint Index is 152% (the “Target Footprint Index”).  None of the Grant RSUs subject to adjustment based on the Global Footprint Index will be payable if the Global Footprint Index is below 96.5% (the “Threshold Footprint Index”), which represents 25% of the difference between the Target Footprint Index and an index for fiscal 2008 calculated in the same manner.  The number of Earned RSUs based on Global Footprint Index shall be determined as follows:

(i) if the Global Footprint Index is below the Threshold Footprint Index, 50% of the Grant RSUs will be cancelled;

(ii) if the Global Footprint Index is at the Threshold Footprint Index, the Earned RSUs shall include 12.5% of the Grant RSUs;

(iii) if the Global Footprint Index is at or above the Target Footprint Index, the Earned RSUs shall include 50% of the Grant RSUs; and

(iv) if the Global Footprint Index is above the Threshold Footprint Index and below the Target Footprint Index, the Earned RSUs shall include a number of Grant RSUs to be determined by straight-line interpolation between 12.5% and 50% of the Grant RSUs based on the Global Footprint Index relative to the Threshold Footprint Index and the Target Footprint Index.
 
 


Exhibit 10.3
 
 
Summary of Equity Awards Granted to Mr. Paliwal and Mr. Parker
 
In September 2008, the Compensation and Option Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Harman International Industries, Incorporated (the “Company”) approved, among other things, long-term equity grants for the Company’s executive officers, including Dinesh Paliwal, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  The grants to Mr. Paliwal included a total of 72,748 stock options and 78,757 restricted stock units, all under the Company’s 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”). 1   The stock options vest ratably over three years, subject to Mr. Paliwal’s continued employment with the Company, and have an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.  For each restricted stock unit, Mr. Paliwal is entitled to one share of the Company’s common stock.  The restricted stock units vest three years from the date of grant, subject to Mr. Paliwal’s continued employment with the Company.  Mr. Paliwal’s letter agreement, which entitles him to receive these annual equity awards, provides for award agreements with provisions that are inconsistent with the applicable award agreements under the Incentive Plan and previously approved by the Committee.  As a result, at its next meeting in December 2008, the Committee intends to approve new award agreements under the Incentive Plan for these awards, consistent with the terms described above and the terms provided for in Mr. Paliwal’s letter agreement.
 
In September 2008, the Committee also approved a one-time grant to Mr. Parker of 28,344 restricted stock units outside of the Incentive Plan.  For each restricted stock unit, Mr. Parker will be entitled to receive one share of the Company’s common stock.  Of the 28,344 restricted stock units, 23,595 vest on February 2, 2009 and 4,749 vest on May 13, 2010, subject to Mr. Parker’s continued employment with the Company.  At its next meeting in December 2008, the Committee intends to approve an award agreement that will set forth the terms of Mr. Parker’s award, consistent with those described above.
 
 
___________________________
1 Of the 78,757 restricted stock units, 28,757 are subject to stockholder approval of amendments to the Incentive Plan, as set forth in the Company’s proxy statement mailed to stockholders on or about October 22, 2008.
 
 


Exhibit 31.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dinesh C. Paliwal, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Harman International Industries, Incorporated;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.



Date:   November 10, 2008
/s/  Dinesh C. Paliwal  
 
 
Dinesh C. Paliwal
 
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 


Exhibit 31.2

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Herbert K. Parker, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Harman International Industries, Incorporated;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 
(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.



Date:   November 10, 2008
/s/  Herbert K. Parker
 
 
Herbert Parker
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 


Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Harman International Industries, Incorporated (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:
 
 
1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 

Date:  November 10, 2008


/s/ Dinesh C. Paliwal
 
Name:
Dinesh Paliwal
  Title:
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
     
     
/s/ Herbert K. Parker
 
Name:
Herbert Parker
  Title:
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.