UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-K
|
(Mark One)
|
||
|
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 | ||
| or | ||
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| For the transition period from to | ||
Commission File Number 001-13957
WestCoast Hospitality Corporation
|
Washington
|
91-1032187 | |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
201 W. North River Drive, Suite 100
Spokane Washington (Address of principal executive offices) |
99201-2293
(Zip Code) |
|
Registrants Telephone Number, Including
Area Code:
(509) 459-6100
Securities registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
Guarantee with Respect to 9.5% Trust Preferred
Securities (Liquidation Amount of $25 per Trust Preferred
Security)
of WestCoast Hospitality Capital Trust
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants common stock held by non-affiliates was $45.5 million as of June 30, 2003. There were 13,045,549 shares of the Registrants common stock outstanding as of March 22, 2004.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the Registrants 2003 fiscal year, is incorporated by reference herein in Part III.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PART I
This annual report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements. We have based these statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. When words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan, seek, should, will and similar expressions or their negatives are used in this annual report, these are forward-looking statements. Many possible events or factors, including those discussed in Risk Factors Relating to Our Business beginning on page 9 of this annual report, could affect our future financial results and performance, and could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those expressed. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this annual report.
In this report, we, us, our, our company and the company refer to WestCoast Hospitality Corporation and, as the context requires, its wholly and partially owned subsidiaries, and WestCoast refers to WestCoast Hospitality Corporation. The term the system or system of hotels refers to our entire group of owned, leased, managed and franchised hotels.
Item 1. Business
Introduction
We are a NYSE-listed hospitality and leisure company primarily engaged in the ownership, management, development and franchising of mid-scale, full service hotels under our WestCoast and Red Lion brands. In addition to our hotel operations, we are engaged in entertainment and real estate operations. As of December 31, 2003, our hotel system contained 71 hotels located in 12 states and one Canadian province, with more than 12,300 rooms and 579,000 square feet of meeting space. We managed 48 of these hotels, consisting of 27 owned hotels, 15 leased hotels and six third-party owned hotels. The remaining 23 hotels were owned and operated by third-party franchisees.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, we reported net income of approximately $1.2 million, compared to net income of approximately $8.0 million in 2002. This decrease of $6.8 million between years includes a $3.7 million decline between periods in operating income for hotels and restaurants.
A number of repositioning initiatives impacted year-on-year financial comparisons, including the following: results from the first quarter of 2002 included a $3.0 million pre-tax gain on the sale of an office building; 2003 results included more than $794 thousand of conversion expenses including a non-cash write down of signage related to the re-branding of hotels to the Red Lion name; we completed the refinance and replacement of our revolving credit facility in the second and third quarter of 2003, resulting in a non-cash write-off of $927 thousand in loan fees; in the second quarter of 2003 we realized a loss on disposition of a partnership interest of $443 thousand; and, during 2003 we recaptured approximately $2.1 million of non-cash depreciation expense associated with assets that were reclassified in 2003 as no longer held for sale. The above items combined to account for $7.3 million of the decline in income before taxes in 2003 compared to 2002.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, we recorded a loss applicable to common shareholders of $1.3 million or $0.10 per common share. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 we recorded income applicable to common shareholders of $5.4 million and $7.6 million, respectively, or $0.42 and $0.59 per share, respectively. Included in those amounts for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 are $2.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively, of preferred stock dividends.
In the first quarter of 2004 we completed a public offering of $46 million of trust preferred securities through WestCoast Hospitality Capital Trust, a Delaware statutory trust sponsored by WestCoast. This transaction is discussed further in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
A comprehensive discussion of net income for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, individual operating unit performances, general corporate expenses and other significant items can be found in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of
2
Overview and Company Strategy
As discussed above, we are a hospitality and leisure company. We intend to grow our hotel operations primarily by expanding the number of hotels franchised under the Red Lion and WestCoast brands. We are focusing our growth in the western United States and Canada by pursuing a hub and spoke pattern of establishing brand penetration in key cities, followed by expansion into adjoining markets. We intend to increase the number of management agreements we have with third-party hotel owners by aggressively marketing our management services, and we will also seek opportunities to grow through acquisitions of whole or partial interests in hotels.
Through our entertainment division, which includes our TicketsWest.com, Inc. subsidiary (TicketsWest), we engage in activities complementary to the operation of the hotels in our system. TicketsWest provides event ticket distribution services and promotes and presents a variety of entertainment productions in communities we have targeted for hotel market penetration. TicketsWest offers ticketing inventory management systems, call center services and outlet and electronic channel distribution, and has developed an electronic ticketing platform that is integrated with our electronic hotel distribution system, allowing us to cross-sell leisure and entertainment packages to promote occupancy in system hotels.
Our real estate division engages in the traditional real estate related services that we have pursued since we were originally founded, including developing, managing and acting as a broker for sales and leases of commercial and multi-unit residential properties. This division provides services that we utilize for our hotels and other real estate that we own and lease. Our real estate division also derives a substantial part of its revenues from fees it generates from services it provides to third parties.
We trace our history back to 1937, with the founding of our predecessor as a general commercial real estate development and management business. In the 1970s, our predecessor began focusing on the development and management of hotels. Our company was incorporated in the State of Washington on April 25, 1978 as its successor. We continued to grow our hotel business under the brand name Cavanaughs throughout the 1980s and 1990s, and in 1998 we completed the initial public offering of our common stock. We acquired WestCoast Hotels, Inc. on December 31, 1999, which added more than 4,800 rooms in 20 cities to our system of hotels, enhanced our presence in certain key western hub markets, including Seattle, Portland, San Francisco and Southern California, and launched our company into the franchise business. Following this acquisition, we rebranded our Cavanaughs hotels to the WestCoast brand and changed our name to WestCoast Hospitality Corporation. On December 31, 2001 we acquired Red Lion Hotels, Inc., which added more than 7,400 rooms in 40 cities to our system of hotels, further enhanced our presence in a number of hub markets and afforded us the opportunity to expand our franchise business to include the Red Lion brand.
Our senior management team, led by our President and Chief Executive Officer, Arthur M. Coffey, brings an experienced and innovative approach to the management of our operations. Our senior management team has extensive relevant business experience, and five members of the team have been with our company for more than 20 years. Our senior management teams strengths include hotel development, ownership and management; franchising, sales and marketing; food and beverage management; entertainment production and real estate services. Their extensive expertise, along with their diverse working backgrounds provides our company with a broad perspective from which we can make strategic management and operational decisions.
A substantial portion of our assets are held by three of our subsidiaries: Red Lion Hotels, Inc., WestCoast Hotels, Inc. and WestCoast Hospitality Limited Partnership, which we refer to as WHLP. We are the sole general partner and approximately 98% owner of WHLP. We own 100% of the outstanding capital stock of both Red Lion Hotels, Inc. and WestCoast Hotels, Inc.
3
Hospitality Industry Performance Measures
We believe that the following performance measures, which are widely used in the hospitality industry and appear throughout this annual report, are important to our discussion of operating performance:
| Total available rooms represents the number of rooms available multiplied by the number of days in the reported period. We use total available rooms as a measure of capacity in our system of hotels. Rooms under significant renovation are excluded from total available rooms. | |
| Average occupancy represents total paid rooms occupied divided by total available rooms. We use average occupancy as a measure of the utilization of capacity in our system of hotels. | |
| Revenue per available room, or RevPAR, represents total room and related revenues divided by total available rooms. We use RevPAR as a measure of performance yield in our system of hotels. | |
| Average daily rate, or ADR, represents total room revenues divided by the total number of paid rooms occupied by hotel guests. We use ADR as a measure of room pricing in our system of hotels. |
Comparable hotels are hotels that have been owned, leased, managed or franchised by us for more than one year. Throughout this annual report, unless otherwise stated, RevPAR, ADR and average occupancy statistics are calculated using statistics for comparable hotels.
Business Segments
For financial accounting purposes, we divide our operations into four business segments: hotels and restaurants; franchise, central service and development; entertainment; and real estate. In addition, corporate services consist primarily of miscellaneous revenues and expenses, cash and cash equivalents, certain receivables and certain property and equipment that are not specifically associated with an operating segment. Management reviews and evaluates the operating segments exclusive of interest expense, income tax expense and other income and expense items. Therefore, these items are not allocated to the segments.
The following table illustrates, for the periods indicated, revenue per reportable business segment and the percentage of total revenue generated by each segment. For additional information regarding segments, please refer to Business Segments in the notes to our consolidated financial statements that are part of this annual report (in thousands).
4
Hotel Operations
Hotel operations include our hotels and restaurants business segment, as well as our franchise, central services and development segment.
| Owned Hotels |
We owned or had an ownership interest in and operated 27 hotels with a total of 4,952 rooms and more than 244,000 square feet of meeting space as of December 31, 2003. The number of owned properties includes three hotels for which the underlying land is leased. The lease expiration dates range from 2014 to 2062, with one lease containing a renewal option. Under these land leases, we are responsible for repairs and maintenance, operating expenses and management of operations. For additional information, refer to Operating Lease Commitments in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. We operate restaurants in 22 of our owned hotels. Two of these 22 hotels also contain a restaurant space under lease to a third party.
| Leased Hotels |
As of December 31, 2003 we leased 15 hotels with a total of 2,536 rooms and more than 113,000 square feet of meeting space. Under these leases, we are responsible for hotel operations and management. We recognize revenues and associated expenses with leased hotel operations. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally the owners responsibility; however, under certain leases we are obligated to replace these items on an as needed basis. Lease terms typically require us to pay fixed monthly rent and variable rent based on a percentage of revenue if certain sales thresholds are reached. In addition, we are responsible for repairs and maintenance, operating expenses and management of operations. Refer to Operating Lease Commitments in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. We operate restaurants in 13 of our leased hotels. Each of the remaining two leased hotels has a restaurant under lease to a third party.
| Managed Hotels |
As of December 31, 2003, we managed six third-party owned hotels with a total of 1,199 rooms and more than 87,000 square feet of meeting space. We refer to these hotels as managed hotels. Under the typical management agreement, we manage virtually all aspects of the hotels operations, while the hotel owner is responsible for operating and other expenses. Our management fee is normally based on a percentage of the hotels gross revenue plus an incentive fee based on operating performance. We are generally reimbursed for out-of-pocket costs. The duration of our management agreements varies, and hotel owners in some cases have renewal options. Five of the managed hotels operated as Red Lion or WestCoast franchisees.
| Franchised Hotels |
As of December 31, 2003, we had franchise arrangements with 23 hotels that were owned and operated by third parties under our licensed brand names. These hotels, which we refer to as franchised hotels, had at that date a total of 3,636 rooms and more than 134,000 square feet of meeting space. We do not have management or operational responsibility for franchised hotels. However, we do provide certain services to those hotels, including reservation systems, advertising and national sales, a guest loyalty program, revenue
5
| Hotel Brands |
The hotels in our system primarily operate under our WestCoast and the Red Lion brands. In February 2003, we re-branded 22 hotels to Red Lion Hotels, bringing the 62 hotels then under the Red Lion brand to its largest size in the history of the brand. Our Red Lion brand is nationally recognized and is typically associated with three- and four-star full-service hotels. As discussed below, we plan to focus our growth strategy on conversion of new hotels to our Red Lion brand. Our WestCoast brand is associated with distinctive and independently recognized hotels that are known apart from their WestCoast affiliation and are located in the western region of the United States.
| Statistical Information |
The following table provides certain information about our system of hotels as of December 31, 2003.
| Total | Meeting | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Available | Space | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hotels | Rooms | (sq. ft.) | Occupancy | ADR | RevPAR | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Owned or leased
|
42 | 7,488 | 357,413 | 55.1% | $ | 68.35 | $ | 37.65 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Managed
|
6 | 1,199 | 87,534 | 71.1% | 82.98 | 59.02 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Franchised
|
23 | 3,636 | 134,923 | 54.8% | 66.59 | 36.46 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
71 | 12,323 | 579,870 | 56.7% | $ | 69.92 | $ | 39.65 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Hotel System Growth Strategy
We intend to grow our hotel operations primarily by increasing the number of hotels franchised and managed under our Red Lion and WestCoast brands, with an immediate focus on the western region of the United States and Canada. As we expand the number of franchised hotels in our franchise system, we expect our royalty fee income to increase.
We anticipate that most of our growth will come through conversion of three-and four-star hotels to the nationally recognized Red Lion brand. Our expansion of the Red Lion brand will follow our hub and spoke expansion model. Initially, we will seek to achieve market penetration in a hub. After establishing a critical mass in the hub, we will seek to expand into surrounding areas to increase brand penetration in the market.
We plan to focus our expansion of the WestCoast brand by targeting distinctive and independently recognized hotels located in the western region of the United States. We believe the WestCoast brand will be attractive to independent hotels that desire to maintain their own identity while obtaining the benefits of a larger hotel system.
We intend to increase the number of management agreements we have with third-party hotel owners by aggressively marketing our management services. We believe that our experience in managing our own hotels and those of third parties gives us a competitive advantage to obtain such agreements. We also intend to seek opportunities to sell reservation and distribution management services to hotels that want to remain independent.
We have recently upgraded the technology for our central reservation and distribution management system to make the system more effective for existing, and more attractive for prospective, participants in our hotel system. The new system gives us greater access to current information about our room inventory and allows us to change rates in real time, thereby affording us greater managerial control over our occupancy and ADR. We believe this new system will have a positive financial impact on the hotels in our system and will therefore be attractive to other hotels that might desire to join our system.
6
We expect to receive a progressively higher percentage of our reservations through third-party internet channels such as Travelocity.com, Expedia.com and Priceline.com, which we refer to as alternate distribution systems or ADS. It is important to carefully manage our reservations through ADS channels because they are typically at lower rates than through other channels. To help manage distribution on these channels, we have signed fixed-charge markup agreements with nine ADS providers that typically entitle the provider to keep a fixed percentage of the price paid by the customer for each room booked. Our recent technological upgrades allow us to manage the yield on these ADS channels on a real-time, hotel-by-hotel basis. We have the ability to change our prices on these channels at any time for any hotel, which allows us to seek to maximize our return on these channels in accordance with the then prevailing market conditions.
We also will seek opportunities to grow through acquisitions of whole or partial interests in hotels. We plan to leverage our management and marketing services capabilities to enter into joint venture relationships to own, operate, market and/or manage additional hotels. We expect these relationships will allow us to expand our system of branded hotels and derive revenues from expanded hotel ownership and from management and marketing activities.
We have positioned our company to take advantage of an economic recovery by increasing our market penetration through an expanded sales force, the implementation of technology upgrades and the establishment of a new guest loyalty program, GuestAwards. Specifically, we have made a significant investment to upgrade our central reservations and distribution management system and expanded our national sales team in an effort to increase the cross-selling of our products and services. Additionally, our GuestAwards program enhances customer retention by providing a single guest loyalty program for our customers across all brands. We are also in the process of standardizing our food and beverage services across all of our owned and many of our other hotels, which we believe will help create a consistent guest experience at a reduced cost.
During the year ended December 31, 2003, we spent a total of $7.3 million on capital improvement programs, including $5.6 million on our hotels and restaurants. During 2004, we expect to spend approximately an additional $11.5 million on capital improvements with a focus in our hotels and restaurants segment, primarily in guest contact areas. In addition to our owned hotels, we are proactively working with our franchisees to ensure that they continue to meet Red Lion and WestCoast standards.
Guest Loyalty Program
In February 2003, we integrated the best features of our Red Lion Club and WestAwards guest loyalty programs in order to enhance guest services with a single expanded guest loyalty program, GuestAwards. We are continuing to promote guest loyalty by providing our guests the flexibility to earn air miles with each qualifying hotel stay or points for every eligible dollar charged to the guest room. GuestAward points are redeemable for complimentary hotel stays, air miles or travel, car rental, merchandise, entertainment and other incentives.
E-Business
In February 2003, we launched a new hotel reservation system that allows us to manage single image inventory through our distribution channels and execute rate management strategies through channels of distribution including voice, global distribution systems and Internet sites.
In addition, we provide effective and efficient guest service including online hotel reservations, GuestAwards enrollment and ticketing of TicketsWest events, through our various websites, www.redlion.com, www.westcoasthotels.com, www.guestawards.com and www.ticketswest.com.
Team Red
In February 2003, we launched Team Red, an innovative community outreach program designed to benefit local communities while rewarding employees and guests for volunteer work. We continue to build on our long-term commitment to assist and support our local communities through Team Red and other civic initiatives.
7
Marketing
Our marketing strategy provides quality and value to the hotels in our system through our national reach and regional focus. Through consistent messaging in high visibility markets, we target the majority of market segments and distribution channels for our system of hotels. In addition, we offer intelligence tools such as rate management strategies, competitive set benchmarking and market demand reports to the majority of the hotels in our system to increase our regional reach with individuality, focused on the propertys customer base.
Competition
The lodging industry is comprised of numerous national, regional and local hotel companies. We compete against these companies in the mid-scale full-service hotel segment of the industry, primarily in downtown locations. Competition for occupancy is focused on three major segments of traveler: the business traveler, which is a significant occupancy driver for our hotel system; the convention and group business traveler, which utilizes room nights, meeting space and food and beverage operations; and the leisure traveler. Leisure travelers occupy approximately the same number of rooms as the convention and group business travelers, however, their travel is seasonal in nature. Marketing efforts throughout the year are geared towards these three major segments.
We also compete with other hotel operators and management companies for hotels to add to our system. Our competitors include management companies as well as large hotel chains that own and operate their own hotels and franchise their brands.
Trademarks
We have registered the following trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: Red Lion, WestCoast, WestAwards, TicketsWest and G&B (G&B Real Estate Services is the name used by our real estate division). We have also registered some of these trademarks in Canada and Mexico. We also own various derivatives of these trademarks, each of which is registered with or has a registration application pending with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We have also applied to register GuestAwards as a trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Our trademarks and the associated name recognition are valuable to our business.
Non-core Asset Sales
We continue to focus on our hotel operations and, as a result, may from time to time seek to opportunistically divest our interests in non-core assets, such as office buildings, to reinvest in our hotel business. We are currently actively marketing for sale two office buildings in Spokane, Washington.
Seasonality
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Significant portions of our revenues and profits are realized from May through October. Our results for any quarter may not be indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full fiscal year. In addition, results are affected by our rapid growth; national and regional economic conditions, including the magnitude and duration of the current economic slowdown in the United States; actual and threatened terrorist attacks and international conflicts and their impact on travel; and weather conditions.
Employees
As of December 31, 2003, we employed approximately 4,300 persons on a full- and part-time basis, with 3,900 in hotel operations and the remainder in our administrative office and our entertainment and real estate divisions. Approximately 300 persons in hotel operations were covered by various collective bargaining agreements providing, generally, for basic pay rates, working hours, other conditions of employment and orderly settlement of labor disputes. We believe our employee relations are satisfactory.
8
Risk Factors Relating to Our Business
| Our operating results are subject to conditions affecting the lodging industry. |
Our revenues and our operating results are subject to conditions affecting the lodging industry. These include:
| | changes in the national, regional and local economic climate; | |
| | actual and threatened terrorist attacks and international conflicts and their impact on travel; | |
| | local conditions such as an oversupply of, or a reduction in demand for, hotel rooms; | |
| | the attractiveness of the hotels in our system to consumers and competition from other hotels; | |
| | the quality, philosophy and performance of the managers of the hotels in our system; | |
| | increases in operating costs due to inflation and other factors such as increases in the price of energy, healthcare or insurance; | |
| | changes in travel patterns, extreme weather conditions and cancellation of or changes in events scheduled to occur in our markets; and | |
| | the need periodically to repair and renovate the hotels in our system. |
Changes in any of these conditions could adversely impact hotel room demand and pricing and result in reduced occupancy, ADR and RevPAR or could otherwise adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We have a limited ability to pass through increased operating costs in the form of higher room rates, so that such increases could result in lower operating margins.
| If we are unable to compete successfully, our business may be materially harmed. |
The lodging industry is highly competitive. Competition in the industry is primarily based on service quality, range of services, brand name recognition, convenience of location, room rates, guest amenities and quality of accommodations. We compete with other national limited and full service hotel companies as well as various regional and local hotels. Many of our competitors have a larger network of locations and greater financial resources than our company. Additionally, new and existing competitors may offer significantly lower rates, greater convenience, services or amenities or superior facilities, which could attract customers away from our hotels, resulting in a decrease in occupancy rates, ADR and RevPAR for our hotels. Changes in demographics and other changes in our markets may also adversely impact the convenience or desirability of our hotel locations thereby reducing occupancy, ADR and RevPAR and otherwise adversely impacting our results of operations and financial condition.
| Due to the geographic concentration of the hotels in our system, our results of operations and financial condition are subject to fluctuations in regional economic conditions. |
Of the hotels in our system, 53 are located in Oregon, Washington, Idaho or Montana. Therefore, our results of operations and financial condition may be significantly affected by the economy of the Pacific Northwest, which is dependent in large part on a limited number of major industries, including agriculture, tourism, technology, timber and aerospace. These industries may be affected by:
| | changes in governmental regulations and economic conditions; | |
| | the relative strength of national and local economies; and | |
| | the rate of national and local unemployment. |
In addition, companies in these industries may decide to relocate all or part of their businesses outside the Pacific Northwest. Any of these factors could materially affect the local economies in which these industries operate and where we have a presence. Other adverse events affecting the Pacific Northwest, such as economic recessions or natural disasters, could cause a loss of revenues for our hotels in this region, which may
9
| Our expenses may remain constant even if revenues decline. |
The expenses of owning property are not necessarily reduced when circumstances such as market factors and competition cause a reduction in income from a hotel. Accordingly, a decrease in our revenues could result in a disproportionately higher decrease in our earnings because our expenses are unlikely to decrease proportionately. In such instances, our financial condition and ability to service debt could be adversely affected by:
| | interest rate levels; | |
| | the availability of financing; | |
| | the cost of compliance with government regulations, including zoning and tax laws; and | |
| | changes in government regulations, including those governing usage, zoning and taxes. |
| Our inability to sell real estate when appropriate may adversely affect our financial condition. |
Real estate assets generally cannot be sold quickly. We may not be able to vary our portfolio of hotels or other real estate promptly in response to economic or other conditions. This inability to respond promptly to changes in the performance of our assets could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to service debt, including the debentures. In addition, sales of appreciated real property could generate material adverse tax consequences, which may make it disadvantageous for us to sell certain of our hotels.
| If we are unable to effectively integrate new hotels into our operations, our results of operations and financial condition may suffer. |
We intend to grow our hotel operations partly by acquiring whole or partial interests in hotels. However, we cannot assure you that:
| | we will be able to successfully integrate these new hotels or new hotel products into our operations; | |
| | these new hotels or new hotel products will achieve revenue and profitability levels comparable to our existing hotels; or | |
| | to the extent integration occurs, our business will be profitable. |
Based on our experience, newly acquired, developed or converted hotels typically begin with lower occupancy and room rates, thereby resulting in lower revenue. Our expansion within our existing markets could adversely affect the financial performance of our existing hotels in those markets and thus negatively impact our overall results of operations. Expansion into new markets may also present operating and marketing challenges that are different from those we currently encounter in our existing markets. Our inability to anticipate all of the changing demands that expanding operations will impose on our management and management information and reservation systems, or our failure to quickly adapt our systems and procedures to the new markets could result in lost revenue and increased expenses and otherwise have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
| If our franchisees terminate or fail to renew their relationship with our company, our franchise revenue will decline. |
As of December 31, 2003, there were 23 hotels in our system that were owned by others and operated under franchise agreements with us. Although these agreements generally specify a fixed term, they typically contain various early termination provisions, such as the right to terminate upon notice by paying us a
10
| We may be unsuccessful in identifying and completing acquisition opportunities, which could limit our ability to implement our long-term growth strategy and result in significant expenses. |
We intend to pursue a full range of growth opportunities, including identifying hotels for acquisition, development, management, rebranding and franchising. We compete for growth opportunities with national and regional hospitality companies, some of which have greater name recognition, marketing support, reservation system capacity and financial resources than we do. Our ability to make acquisitions is dependent upon, among other things, our relationships with owners of existing hotels and certain major hotel investors, financing acquisitions and renovations and successfully integrating new hotels into our operations. We may be unable to find suitable hotels for acquisition, development, management, rebranding or franchising on acceptable terms, or at all. Competition with other hotel companies may increase the cost of acquiring hotels. Even if suitable hotels are identified for acquisition, we may not be able to find financing to acquire the hotels on acceptable terms. Further, we may not have adequate cash from operations to pursue such growth opportunities. Our failure to compete successfully for acquisitions, to obtain suitable financing for acquisitions we have identified or to attract and maintain relationships with hotel owners and major hotel investors could adversely affect our ability to expand our system of hotels. An inability to implement our growth strategy could limit our ability to grow our revenue base and otherwise adversely affect our results of operations.
| Hotel and entertainment acquisitions could fail to perform in accordance with our expectations, and our hotel development, redevelopment and renovation projects might be more costly than we anticipate. |
We intend to acquire additional hotels and we may acquire additional ticket and entertainment operations in the future. We also intend to continue the redevelopment and re-branding of other acquired hotels into WestCoast and Red Lion hotels. In addition, we expect to develop new hotels in the future, depending on market conditions. Hotel redevelopment, renovation and new project development are subject to a number of risks, including:
| | construction delays or cost overruns; | |
| | risks that the hotels will not achieve anticipated performance levels; and | |
| | new project commencement risks such as receipt of zoning, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations. |
As a result of these risks, we could incur substantial costs for a project that is never completed. Further, financing for these projects may not be available or, even if available, may not be on acceptable terms. Any unanticipated delays or expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition, development, redevelopment or renovation of the hotels in our system could impact expected revenues, negatively affect our reputation among hotel customers, owners and franchisees and otherwise adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
| Risks associated with real estate ownership may adversely affect revenue or increase expenses. |
As of December 31, 2003, our hotel system contained 71 hotels located in 12 states and one Canadian province, with more than 12,300 rooms and 579,000 square feet of meeting space. We managed 48 of these hotels, including 27 owned hotels, 15 leased hotels and six third-party owned hotels. The remaining 23 hotels were owned and operated by third-parties franchisees. We also own several other commercial and multi-unit residential properties. Accordingly, we are subject to varying degrees of risk that generally arise from the
11
| | changes in national, regional and local economic conditions; | |
| | changes in local real estate market conditions; | |
| | increases in interest rates, and other changes in the availability, cost and terms of financing and capital leases; | |
| | increases in property and other taxes; | |
| | the impact of present or future environmental legislation and adverse changes in zoning laws and other regulations; and | |
| | compliance with environmental laws. |
An increase in interest rates or property and other taxes could increase expenses and adversely affect our cash flow. Adverse conditions such as those discussed above could cause the terms of our borrowings to become unfavorable to us. In such circumstances, if we were in need of capital to repay indebtedness in accordance with its terms or otherwise, we could be required to sell one or more hotels at times that might not permit realization of the maximum return on our investments. Unfavorable changes in one or more of these conditions could also result in unanticipated expenses and higher operating costs, thereby reducing operating margins and otherwise adversely affecting our results of operations and financial condition.
| Due to the shareholdings of our Chairman together with other members of the Barbieri family, we may be limited in our ability to undertake a change of control transaction requiring shareholder approval. |
As of March 22, 2004, Donald K. Barbieri, our Chairman of the Board, had sole or shared voting and investment power with respect to 26.4% of our outstanding shares of common stock. His brother, Richard L. Barbieri, who is also a director, beneficially owned 4.2% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of that date. David M. Bell, who is one of our executive officers and the brother-in-law of Messrs. Barbieri beneficially owned 4.6% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of that date. In addition, we believe that other members of the Barbieri family who are not directors, executive officers or 5% shareholders may hold individually or in the aggregate significant amounts of our outstanding common stock. As long as these holders own a substantial portion of the outstanding common stock, they may have the ability as a group to approve or block actions requiring the approval of our shareholders, including a merger or a sale of all the assets of our company or a transaction that results in a change of control. In some circumstances, such actions could be against the interests of the other common shareholders and holders of our other securities.
| We are subject to governmental regulations affecting the lodging industry; the costs of complying with governmental regulations, or our failure to comply with such regulations, could affect our financial condition and results of operations. |
We are subject to numerous federal, state and local government regulations affecting the lodging industry, including building and zoning requirements. Increased government regulation could require us to make unplanned expenditures and result in higher operating costs. Further, we are subject to laws governing our relationship with employees, including minimum wage requirements, overtime, working conditions and work permit requirements. An increase in the minimum wage rate, employee benefit costs or other costs associated with employees could increase expenses and result in lower operating margins. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the ADA), all public accommodations are required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. We may be required to remove access barriers or make unplanned, substantial modifications to our hotels to comply with the ADA or to comply with other changes in governmental rules and regulations, which could reduce the number of total available rooms, increase operating costs and have a negative impact on revenues and earnings. Any failure to comply with ADA requirements or other governmental regulations could result in the U.S. government imposing fines or in private litigants winning damage awards against us.
12
| Our business is seasonal in nature, and we are likely to experience fluctuations in our results of operations and financial condition. |
Our business is seasonal in nature, with the months from May through October generally accounting for a greater portion of annual revenues than the months from November through April. Therefore, our results for any quarter may not be indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full fiscal year. The seasonal nature of our business increases our vulnerability to risks such as labor force shortages and cash flow problems. Further, if an adverse event such as an actual or threatened terrorist attack, international conflict, regional economic downturn or poor weather conditions should occur during the months of May through October, the adverse impact to our revenues could likely be greater as a result of our seasonal business.
| Failure to retain senior management could adversely affect our business. |
We place substantial reliance on the lodging industry experience and the institutional knowledge of members of our senior management team. Mr. Coffey and Mr. Taffin are particularly important to our future success due to their substantial experience in the lodging industry and their long history with our company. The loss of the services of either of these members of our senior management team could hinder our ability to effectively manage our business and implement our growth strategies. Finding suitable replacements for Mr. Coffey or Mr. Taffin could be difficult, and competition for such personnel of similar experience is intense. We do not carry key person insurance on any of our senior management.
| If we are unable to locate lessees for our office and retail space our revenues and cash flow may be adversely affected. |
We own and lease to others approximately 500,000 square feet of office and retail space in Spokane, Washington and Kalispell, Montana. We are subject to the risk that leases for this space might not be renewed upon their expiration, the space may not be relet or the terms of renewal or reletting such space (including the cost of required renovations) might be less favorable to us than current lease terms. Vacancies could result due to the termination of a tenants tenancy, the tenants financial failure or a breach of the tenants obligations. We may be unable to locate tenants for rental spaces vacated in the future or we may be limited to renting space on unfavorable terms. Delays or difficulties in attracting tenants and costs incurred in preparing for tenants could reduce cash flow, decrease the value of a property and jeopardize our ability to pay our expenses.
| We are subject to risks associated with managing and leasing properties owned by third parties. |
We plan to continue to manage and lease properties owned by third parties. Risks associated with these activities include the risks that:
| | related contracts (which are typically cancelable upon 30-days notice or upon major events, including sale of the property) will be terminated by the property owner or will be lost in connection with a sale of such property; | |
| | contracts might not be renewed upon expiration or might not be renewed on terms consistent with current terms; and | |
| | rental revenues upon which management and leasing fees are based will decline as a result of general real estate market conditions or specific market factors affecting properties managed or leased by us, resulting in decreased management or leasing fee income. |
| The performance of our entertainment division is particularly subject to fluctuations in economic conditions. |
Our entertainment division, which comprised 4.3% of our total revenues in 2003, engages in event ticketing and the presentation of various entertainment productions. We have in the past attracted additional hotel guests by cross-selling to them products of our TicketsWest subsidiary. Our entertainment division is vulnerable to risks associated with changes in general regional and economic conditions, the potential for significant competition and a change in consumer trends, among others. In addition, we face the risk that
13
| We face risks relating to litigation. |
At any given time, we are subject to claims and actions incidental to the operation of our business. The outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted. If a plaintiff were successful in a claim against our company, we could be faced with the payment of a material sum of money. If this were to occur it could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.
| We may experience material losses in excess of insurance coverage. |
We carry comprehensive liability, public area liability, fire, flood, boiler and machinery, extended coverage and rental loss insurance covering our properties. There are, however, certain types of catastrophic losses that are not generally insured because it is not economically feasible to insure against such losses. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur with respect to any particular property, we could lose our capital invested in the property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property and, in the case of debt which is with recourse to us, would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property. We cannot assure you that material losses in excess of insurance coverage will not occur in the future. Any such loss could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
| We are subject to environmental risks that could be costly. |
Our operating costs may be affected by the obligation to pay for the cost of complying with existing environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, as well as the cost of compliance with future environmental legislation. Under current federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, the presence of contamination from hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure to remediate such contaminated property properly, may adversely affect the ability of the owner of the property to borrow using such property as collateral for a loan or to sell such property. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which a property may be used or transferred or in which businesses may be operated, and may impose remedial or compliance costs. The costs of defending against claims of liability or remediating contaminated property and the cost of complying with environmental laws could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We have not performed Phase II environmental assessments on two of our owned properties for which Phase II assessments were recommended, because we determined that any further investigation was not warranted. We cannot assure you that these properties do not have any environmental concerns associated with them. While we have not been notified by any governmental authority and we have no other knowledge of any material noncompliance, liability or claim relating to hazardous or toxic substances or other environmental substances in connection with any of our properties, we have not performed Phase I environmental assessments on all of our leased property, and we cannot assure you that we will not discover problems that currently exist but to which we have no current knowledge, that future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability, or that the current environmental condition of our existing and future properties will not be affected by the condition of neighboring properties (such as the presence of leaking underground storage tanks) or by third parties (whether neighbors such as dry cleaners or others) unrelated to us.
| We have incurred debt financing and may incur increased indebtedness in connection with future acquisitions. |
Our outstanding indebtedness as of December 31, 2003 was $151.4 million. Subsequent to that date we completed a trust preferred offering for $46 million. Much of our outstanding indebtedness is secured by individual properties, including our owned hotels. Borrowings under our existing credit facility may
14
| The increasing use of third-party travel websites by consumers may adversely affect our profitability. |
Some of our hotel rooms will be booked through third-party travel websites such as Travelocity.com, Expedia.com and Priceline.com. If these Internet bookings increase, these intermediaries may be able to obtain higher commissions, reduced room rates or other significant contract concessions from us. Moreover, some of these Internet travel intermediaries are attempting to offer hotel rooms as a commodity, by increasing the importance of price and general indicators of quality (such as three-star downtown hotel) at the expense of brand identification. We believe that these Internet intermediaries hope that consumers will eventually develop brand loyalties to their reservation systems rather than to our brands. Although most of the business for our hotels is expected to be derived from traditional channels, if the amount of sales made through Internet intermediaries increases significantly, room revenues may flatten or decrease and our profitability may be adversely affected.
Overview
Our hotel properties provide caring service and
comfortable accommodations at competitive prices consistent with
the markets they serve. We seek to maintain consistent quality
in our system of hotels, a majority of which offer valuable
services such as dining, fitness centers, business services and
other ancillary services. In addition, guest rooms are well
equipped with products important to both leisure and business
travelers. Most of our hotels offer flexible meeting space to
service the group and convention markets. We continue to invest
in our hotel properties to maintain quality conditions.
Hotel Listing
The table on the following pages contains a
complete listing of all our hotel properties as of
December 31, 2003:
15
16
17
Environmental Assessments
In connection with our acquisition of a hotel, a
Phase I environmental assessment is conducted by a
qualified independent environmental engineer. A Phase I
environmental assessment involves researching historical usages
of a property, databases containing registered underground
storage tanks and other matters, including an on-site
inspection, to determine whether an environmental issue exists
with respect to the property which needs to be addressed. If the
results of a Phase I environmental assessment reveal
potential issues, a Phase II environmental assessment,
which may include soil testing, ground water monitoring or
borings to locate underground storage tanks, will be ordered for
further evaluation if we determine that further investigation is
warranted. It is possible that Phase I and Phase II
environmental assessments will not reveal all environmental
liabilities or compliance concerns or that there will be
material environmental liabilities or compliance concerns of
which we will not be aware. Phase I environmental
assessments have been performed on all properties owned by us
and we expect that all of our future hotel acquisitions will be
subject to a Phase I environmental assessment and, if we
determine it is warranted, a Phase II environmental
assessment.
Other Properties
In addition to the hotels noted above, the
company maintains direct ownership interest in two office
buildings in Spokane, Washington and a retail mall in Kalispell,
Montana.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
(1)
We exercised our option to purchase this property
in 2003; closing is planned by the second quarter of 2004.
(2)
We purchased this hotel in January of 2004.
(3)
The management agreement for this hotel expired
on December 23, 2003. The property owner entered into an
access agreement with us, which terminated February 24,
2004. The access agreement was for the provision of reservation
services only.
(4)
The management agreement for this hotel expired
on January 15, 2004.
(5)
The franchise agreement for this hotel expired on
December 31, 2003
At any given time, we are subject to claims and
actions incident to the operation of our business. While the
outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted, it is the
opinion of management that none of such proceedings,
individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or
results of operations.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security
holders during the fourth quarter of 2003.
18
Table of Contents
| Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol WEH. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low closing sale prices for the common stock on the NYSE.
The last reported sale price of the common stock on the NYSE on March 22, 2004 was $6.61. As of March 22, 2004, there were approximately 165 shareholders of record of the common stock.
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain earnings to provide funds for the continued growth and development of our business. Please refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources. Any determination to pay cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board. Our board will periodically review the Companys dividend policy on common shares.
We did not repurchase any of our common stock during 2003.
(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank)
19
| Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999. The selected consolidated statement of operations and balance sheet data are derived from our audited financial statements. The audited consolidated financial statements for certain of these periods are included elsewhere in this annual report.
The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by, our consolidated financial statements and related notes, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report (in thousands except per share amounts).
| (1) | The consolidated balance sheet data reflects the acquisition of WestCoast Hotels, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and the acquisition of Red Lion Hotels, Inc. as of December 31, 2001. The results of operations for those entities is included in the consolidated statements of operations beginning the day of the respective acquisition going forward. The comparability is affected by the change in accounting for goodwill amortization beginning with the year ended December 31, 2002. |
20
| (2) | Direct expenses include all direct segment expenses, depreciation and amortization, gain or loss on asset dispositions, and conversion expenses. |
| (3) | Net income or loss applicable to common shareholders represents net income less earned dividends on preferred stock, if applicable. |
| (4) | EBITDA represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not intended to represent net income as defined by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and such information should not be considered as an alternative to net income, cash flows from operations or any other measure of performance prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. |
As noted above, EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We believe it is a useful financial performance measure for us and for our shareholders and is a complement to net income and other financial performance measures provided in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP.
We use EBITDA to measure the financial performance of our owned and leased hotels because it excludes interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which bear little or no relationship to operating performance. By excluding interest expense, EBITDA measures our financial performance irrespective of our capital structure or how we finance our properties and operations. We generally pay federal and state income taxes on a consolidated basis, taking into account how the applicable taxing laws apply to our company in the aggregate. By excluding taxes on income, we believe EBITDA provides a basis for measuring the financial performance of our operations excluding factors that our hotels cannot control. By excluding depreciation and amortization expense, which can vary from hotel to hotel based on historical cost and other factors unrelated to the hotels financial performance, EBITDA measures the financial performance of our hotels without regard to their historical cost. For all of these reasons, we believe that EBITDA provides us and investors with information that is relevant and useful in evaluating our business.
However, because EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization, it does not measure the capital we require to maintain or preserve our fixed assets. In addition, because EBITDA does not reflect interest expense, it does not take into account the total amount of interest we pay on outstanding debt nor does it show trends in interest costs due to changes in our borrowings or changes in interest rates. EBITDA, as defined by us, may not be comparable to EBITDA as reported by other companies that do not define EBITDA exactly as we define the term. Because we use EBITDA to evaluate our financial performance, we reconcile it to net income, which is the most comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or net income determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of performance or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as an indicator of liquidity.
The following table presents a reconciliation of EBITDA to net income in accordance with GAAP for each of the periods presented (in thousands).
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS No. 142), Goodwill and Intangible Assets, which revises the accounting for purchased goodwill and intangible assets. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite
21
Net income and earnings per share adjusted for goodwill amortization for 2001 and years prior compared to fiscal 2003 and 2002 is as follows (in thousands except per share data):
| Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in connection with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and the other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report.
Overview
We operate in four reportable segments: hotels and restaurants; franchise, central services and development; entertainment; and real estate. The hotels and restaurants segment derives revenue primarily from room rentals and food and beverage operations at our owned and leased hotels and from management fees charged to the owners of our managed hotels. Management fees are typically based on a percentage of the hotels gross revenues plus an incentive fee based on operating performance. The franchise, central services and development segment is engaged primarily in licensing our brands to franchisees. This segment generates revenue from royalty fees that are typically based on a percent of room revenues and are charged to hotel owners in exchange for the use of our brands and access to our central services programs (reservation system, guest loyalty program, national and regional sales, revenue management tools, quality inspections, advertising and brand standards.) The entertainment segment derives revenue primarily from ticketing services and promotion of entertainment productions. The real estate segment generates revenue from owning, managing, leasing and developing commercial and multi-unit residential properties.
22
A summary of our consolidated results, balance sheet data and hotel statistics for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
| Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
| Revenues |
Hotel and restaurant revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 declined by $10.2 million, or 5.9%, to $163.1 million compared to $173.3 million in 2002. The decrease was primarily due to reductions of about $6.0 million in room revenue and $3.7 million in food and beverage revenue. At our owned and leased hotels, ADR was $68.35 in 2003 compared to $69.91 in 2002. Average occupancy in 2003 for owned and leased hotels was 55.1% versus 56.9% in 2002. The resulting 2003 RevPAR of $37.65 was $2.14 lower than 2002.
Although demand suffered significantly in the first and second quarters of 2003 due, in our opinion, to declining business and excursion travel resulting from national economic challenges, personal spending cutbacks and certain national security threats, we believe these results reflect that our hotel and restaurants segment began to stabilize during the third quarter. These results are indicative of the overall national trends. We expected to experience normal seasonal declines in revenue during the fourth quarter and were able to reduce the impact of these declines through effective expense management. Also, much of the decline between the fourth quarter of 2003 and 2002 was due to an anticipated drop in group business due to the fact
23
We also believe the rebranding of 22 hotels from WestCoast to Red Lion hotels, which was completed in the first quarter of 2003, is already having a positive effect.
Additionally, in the first quarter of 2002, our hotel in Salt Lake City was positively impacted by the Winter Olympics. The lack of similar activity during the first quarter of 2003 resulted in a $1.3 million decrease in comparative revenues.
Management fee revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 declined $271 thousand from 2002. This drop was the result of both a decline in the number of hotels managed during the comparable periods, from eleven down to six, and a general decline in the room revenues for the managed properties, on which our management fees are primarily based. However, these decreases were partially offset by a $240 thousand management agreement termination fee realized during the fourth quarter of 2003.
We continue to receive a progressively higher percentage of our reservations through third-party Internet channels, on which we generally realize lower room rates. Decreases in ADR slowed during the third and fourth quarters of 2003, partly reflective of our efforts to control these alternate distribution systems, or ADS. We launched a new pilot ADS channel management program in select hotels on August 1, 2003 and have realized positive revenue trends in those properties during the trial period. We have signed fixed-charge markup agreements with nine ADS providers, which typically entitle the provider to keep a fixed percentage of the price paid by the customer for each room booked. The central reservations and distribution management technology placed in service during the first and second quarters of 2003 allows us to manage the yield on ADS channels on a real-time, hotel-by-hotel basis.
Franchise, central services and development revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased by $495 thousand, or 12%, to $3.6 million compared to $4.1 million in 2002. Net changes in franchise fee income accounted for about $672 thousand of this change. The variance was caused by a departure of 17 franchises that left our hotel system in early 2003, offset by the addition of three franchises to our system during the year. However, the decreases in fees during 2003 were offset by the recording of termination fees totaling $798 thousand. We do not believe any of these changes in our system represent a material trend in our business.
Entertainment segment revenue increased $550 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2003 to $8.0 million from $7.4 million in 2002. This increase was due primarily to increased ticket demand for tickets for Broadway productions and for tickets in Eastern Washington and Colorado, especially during the winter ski season in January, February and December of 2003.
Real estate revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased by $87 thousand, or 1.0%, to $8.9 million from $9.0 million in 2002. The decrease was due primarily to reduced rental revenue in connection with the sale of an office building that closed in March 2002, offset by rental income from new tenants at owned real estate properties and by commissions received on the sales and leasing of certain real estate space on behalf of third parties.
| Direct Expenses |
In total, direct expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003 increased $206 thousand or 0.1%, to $169.6 million in 2003 from $169.4 million in 2002.
Direct hotels and restaurants segment expenses decreased from $148.7 million in 2002 to $142.1 million in 2003. The improvement was principally due to savings on labor resulting from adjustments of our workforce. These savings were partially offset by increases in the costs of our self-funded employee medical coverage. We also saw the realization from cost cutting measures early in the year.
In the other operating segments, direct costs increased in aggregate $287 thousand, from $13.3 million in 2002 to $13.6 million in 2003. Direct costs for franchise, central services and development were down $472 thousand due to labor savings and cost containment. Entertainment segment direct costs were up
24
Depreciation and amortization were up due to the $2.1 million recapture of depreciation on assets held for sale described below, additional depreciation on property and equipment additions during the year and additional amortization associated with deferred finance fees associated with the refinance during 2003.
For 2003 the net loss on asset disposals was $390 thousand. The amount is comprised of a $443 thousand loss on the disposition of our interest in a hotel and the disposition of signage related to the rebranding of 22 of our hotels, offset by the recognition of deferred gains related to an office building and a hotel property. The large gain in 2002 is related to the original sale of the same office building. Conversion costs represent the expense incurred unrelated to property and equipment to re-brand the hotels to the Red Lion name.
| Undistributed Corporate Expenses |
Undistributed corporate expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003 increased $523 thousand to $2.6 million from $2.1 million for 2002. This change was due primarily to higher employee benefit costs and increases in the expenses relative to both insurance and professional services in 2003, offset by our cost containment efforts. Undistributed corporate expense includes general and administrative charges such as corporate payroll, legal expense, contributions, directors and officers insurance, bank service charges, outside accountants and consultants expense, and investor relations charges. We consider these expenses to be undistributed because the costs are not directly related to our business segments and therefore are not distributed to those segments. In contrast, costs more directly related to our business segments such as accounting, human resources and information technology expenses are distributed out and included in direct expenses.
| Operating Income |
Operating income for year ended December 31, 2003 decreased $10.9 million or 48.0% from $22.7 million in 2002 to $11.8 million in 2003. We believe the decline in operating income was primarily due to a continued soft market and weak U.S. economy, which continue to result in reduced room rates and occupancy at our hotels.
| Interest Expense |
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $11.2 million, up $433 thousand over 2002 or 4%. The increase was due to a greater average amount of outstanding interest bearing debt in 2003 versus 2002 while the average interest rate on debt stayed consistent, 7.0% in 2003 versus 6.9% in 2002. A substantial portion of our 2003 borrowings carry an interest rate of 6.7% for ten years, which management believes is a favorable long-term rate.
| Income Taxes |
Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased by $4.5 million to a benefit of $132 thousand compared to $4.4 million of expense in 2002 primarily due to lower pre-tax income and the benefit realized from certain tax credits utilized in 2003.
| Other Income (Expense) |
Other income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 2003 was a net expense of $339 thousand, comprised of $927 thousand in deferred loan fee write-offs related to the refinance of debt during the second and fourth quarters of 2003, partially offset by a contract termination fee of $390 thousand and other miscellaneous net gains of $198 thousand. The other income (expense) net balance for the comparable period of 2002 was consistent with our historical results.
25
| Net Income |
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased $6.8 million compared to 2002, due primarily to a $3.7 million decline between periods in operating income for hotels and restaurants. A number of repositioning initiatives impacted year-on-year financial comparisons, including the following: results from the first quarter of 2002 included a $3.0 million pre-tax gain on the sale of an office building; 2003 results included more than $794 thousand of conversion expenses including a non-cash write down of signage related to the re-branding of hotels to the Red Lion name; we completed the refinance and replacement of our revolving credit facility in the second and third quarter of 2003, resulting in a non-cash write-off of $927 thousand in loan fees; in the second quarter of 2003 we realized a loss on disposition of a partnership interest of $443 thousand; and, during 2003 we recaptured approximately $2.1 million of non-cash depreciation expense associated with assets that were reclassified in 2003 as no longer held for sale. The above items accounted for a decline in income before taxes of $7.3 million of the total decline in net income in 2003 compared to 2002.
| Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
Earnings per share for year ended December 31, 2003 decreased by $0.52 to a loss per share of $0.10 compared to $0.42 earnings per share for 2002. The weighted average number of shares outstanding did not change substantively during 2003, however, income (loss) applicable to common shareholders decreased $6.8 million.
| Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2001 |
| Revenues |
Total revenues for 2002 were $194.2 million, an increase of $73.5 million or 61% from 2001. We attribute the overall increase in revenues from 2001 to 2002 to the following:
Hotel and restaurant revenues increased $73.8 million, or 74%, from $99.5 million in 2001 to $173.3 million in 2002. The increase in hotel and restaurant revenues resulted primarily from the acquisition on December 31, 2001 of Red Lion Hotels, Inc., whose hotels contributed $79.4 million to the revenues in 2002. This revenue increase in 2002 was partially offset by a continued soft U.S. economy, resulting in a decrease in demand. Sluggish demand in 2002 resulted in lower room and occupancy rates which contributed to decreases in RevPAR, ADR and average occupancy from their levels in 2001.
Franchise, central services and development revenues increased $924 thousand, or 29%, from $3.2 million in 2001 to $4.1 million in 2002. Of the 2002 revenues, 25%, or $1.0 million, were attributable to franchise and management contracts acquired through the purchase of Red Lion Hotels, Inc. at the end of 2001. This increase was partially offset by reduced franchise application fees and system wide RevPAR declines in 2002 compared to 2001, which we believe resulted from the continued softness of the U.S. economy.
Entertainment division revenues decreased $67 thousand, or 1%, from $7.5 million in 2001 to $7.4 million in 2002. This decrease was primarily due to the removal of call center service revenues and related expenses from the entertainment division to a central program fund which we began to administer effective January 2002 and in which we and our franchisees participate. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in operating revenue as a result of an increase in venues and a favorable event mix in 2002 compared to 2001.
Real estate division revenues decreased $1.1 million, or 11%, from $10.1 million in 2001 to $9.0 million in 2002 primarily due to reduced lease revenue that resulted from the sale of our majority interest in an office building in March 2002.
| Direct Expenses |
Direct expenses increased $74.7 million, or 79%, from $94.7 million in 2001 to $169.4 million in 2002. Virtually all of this increase was due to the addition of 47 hotels to our system as a result of the acquisition of Red Lion Hotels, Inc. at the end of 2001. In addition, net gain on asset dispositions and insurance settlements
26
| Undistributed Corporate Expenses |
Undistributed corporate expenses increased $221 thousand, or 12%, from $1.9 million in 2001 to $2.1 million in 2002. The increase was primarily due to a one-time executive severance payment related to the acquisition of Red Lion Hotels, Inc.
| Operating Income |
Operating income decreased $1.3 million, or 5%, from $24.0 million in 2001 to $22.7 million in 2002. We believe the decline in operating income following the acquisition of Red Lion Hotels, Inc. at the end of 2001 was primarily due to a continued soft market and weak U.S. economy, which resulted in decreases in rates and occupancy in 2002 compared to their levels in 2001. In addition, net gain on asset dispositions was $1.9 million less in 2002 than in 2001.
| Interest Expense |
Interest expense decreased $1.4 million, or 12%, from $12.1 million in 2001 to $10.7 million in 2002. The decrease was attributable to a reduction in outstanding borrowings and a decrease in interest rates charged on our variable rate debt.
| Income Taxes |
Income tax expense decreased $134 thousand from $4.5 million in 2001 to $4.4 million in 2002. The effective income tax rate for 2002 decreased to 35% from 37% in 2001. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the utilization of certain income tax credits in 2002 that exceeded by $118 thousand income tax credits utilized in 2001.
| Net Income |
Net income increased $400 thousand, or 6%, from $7.6 million in 2001 to $8.0 million in 2002. Income applicable to common shareholders decreased $2.2 million, or 29%, from $7.6 million in 2001 to $5.4 million in 2002 due to a $2.6 million of dividends paid in 2002 on preferred stock issued at the end of 2001 in connection with the acquisition of Red Lion Hotels, Inc.
| Earnings Per Share |
Basic earnings per share decreased 29% from $0.59
in 2001 to $0.42 in 2002. Diluted earnings per share decreased
31% from $0.59 in 2001 to $0.41 in 2002.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe that the consummation of the
$46 million offering of trust preferred securities in the
first quarter of 2004 and the $55.2 million debt refinance
in June 2003, described below in Financing, and the
elimination of our preferred stock and its associated dividend
requirements will strengthen our financial condition,
particularly in the long term. In addition, the credit agreement
we entered into in October 2003, also described in
Financing below, provides revolving credit of up to
$10.0 million and a term loan of up to $4.0 million.
We currently intend to use this new credit facility for our
short-term working capital needs and to, among other things,
finance capital expenditures and potential acquisitions of
hotels. In January 2004 we closed on the purchase of the Red
Lion Hotel Yakima Gateway property under an option exercised in
2003.
27
Our short-term liquidity needs include funds for
interest payments on our outstanding indebtedness and on the
debentures, funds for capital expenditures and, potentially,
acquisitions. We expect to meet our short-term liquidity
requirements generally through net cash provided by operations
and reserves established from existing cash, the proceeds of the
trust preferred offering and, if necessary, by drawing upon our
credit facility. A majority of our leased and owned hotels are
subject to leases and debt agreements that require us to spend
3% to 5% of room revenues from these hotels on replacement of
furniture, fixtures and equipment at, or payment of insurance
premiums or real and personal property taxes with respect to,
these hotels. This is consistent with what we would spend on
furniture, fixtures and equipment under normal circumstances to
maintain the competitive appearance of our owned and leased
hotels.
In general, we expect to meet our long-term
liquidity requirements for the funding of property development,
property acquisitions, renovations and other non-recurring
capital improvements through net cash from operations, long-term
secured and unsecured indebtedness, including our credit
facility, through the issuance of debt or equity securities and
through joint ventures.
Historically, our cash and capital requirements
have been satisfied through cash generated from operating
activities, borrowings under our credit facilities, and the
issuance of equity securities. We believe cash flow from
operations, available borrowings under our new credit facility
and cash on hand will provide adequate funds for our foreseeable
working capital needs, planned capital expenditures and debt
service and other obligations through 2004.
Our ability to fund operations, make planned
capital expenditures, make required payments on any securities
we may issue in the future and remain in compliance with the
financial covenants under our debt agreements will be dependent
on our future operating performance. Our future operating
performance is dependent on a number of factors, many of which
are beyond our control, including occupancy and the room rates
we can charge. These factors include prevailing economic
conditions and financial, competitive, regulatory and other
factors affecting our business and operations, and may be
dependent on the availability of borrowings under our credit
facility or other borrowings or securities offerings.
Cash flow from operations for the year ended
December 31, 2003 totaled $11.3 million compared to
$14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Net income, after reconciling adjustments to net cash provided
by operations (such as non-cash income statement impacts like
depreciation, loan fee write-offs, the deferred tax provision,
gains and losses on assets, and the provision for doubtful
accounts) totaled $15.4 million in 2003. For 2002 net
income adjusted for those same items totaled $18.3 million.
The difference was predominantly due to lower operating
performance, specifically in the hotels and restaurants segment.
Working capital changes, including restricted cash, receivables,
accruals, payables, and inventories, used an additional
$4.1 million in cash during 2003. This was predominantly
due to the additions to restricted cash and the timing of
payroll liabilities. In 2002, working capital changes accounted
for $4.0 in the change in cash, mostly related to receivables,
prepaid expenses, and restricted cash.
Net cash used in investing activities was
$1.3 million and $8.7 million for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Additions to
property and equipment totaled $7.3 million in 2003
compared to $10.7 million in 2002. Capital additions
included an investment in signage related to the 2003 Red Lion
rebranding initiative and various other projects in the
operating divisions. It also included additions to certain
software and equipment which was sold and then leased back as
described in Financing below. The other major
variances between the two periods were $1.8 million of
proceeds from asset dispositions received in 2002 compared to
$5.4 million of proceeds from asset dispositions received
in the comparable 2003 period, including $350 thousand
received in connection with the disposition of our ownership
interest in a hotel property in the second quarter of 2003 and
$4.4 million related to the sales-operating leaseback of
another property during the fourth quarter of 2003 also
described below in Financing.
Net financing activities used $2.7 million
during 2003, including scheduled term debt and capital lease
payments of $4.2 million, preferred stock dividends of
$2.6 million, and loan fees paid of $1.5 million. The
uses
28
At December 31, 2003, we had
$13.1 million in cash and cash equivalents including
$5.0 million of cash restricted under securitized borrowing
arrangements for future payment of furniture, fixtures and
equipment, repairs, insurance premiums and real and personal
property taxes. Approximately $4.4 million of the cash
balance was held by an intermediary related to the sale of the
Red Lion River Inn, without restriction as to use, to facilitate
a tax deferred exchange transaction completed in January 2004.
At December 31, 2002 we had $2.7 million in cash on
hand included restricted cash of $1.9 million.
On June 27, 2003, we obtained term debt of
$55.2 million from Column Financial, Inc., a Credit
Suisse First Boston subsidiary. The debt is secured by ten of
our owned hotels, requires monthly payments based on a fixed
interest rate of 6.7% per annum and a 25-year principal
amortization schedule, and matures in full on July 11,
2013. In connection with securing this term debt, we incurred
loan fees and other costs totaling $1.1 million which have
been capitalized and will be amortized using the effective
interest method over the ten-year period of the underlying
promissory notes. We then used a majority of these proceeds to
pay off the $51.5 million outstanding balance on our then
existing revolving credit facility with U.S. Bank, National
Association. This facility was terminated in October 2003 and
all collateral securing the facility was released.
In June 2003, we completed the sale to General
Electric Capital Corporation of software and equipment primarily
related to our new central reservation system previously
included in construction in process. The proceeds of
$2.7 million were used to repay the outstanding balance on
an interim note payable to General Electric Capital Corporation
in the same amount. Certain other costs directly related to the
software and equipment were paid for directly by General
Electric Capital Corporation, totaling $451 thousand. We
then entered into an operating lease agreement with General
Electric Capital Corporation which expires in June 2005
requiring monthly payments of $52 thousand. At our option,
the lease term is renewable for three one-year terms.
In October 2003, we entered into a new revolving
credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
The credit agreement provides us a revolving credit facility
with a total of $10 million in borrowing capacity. This
includes two revolving lines of credit: Line A allows for
maximum borrowings of $7.0 million and is collateralized by
our personal property and five of our owned hotels. Line B
allows for maximum borrowings of $3.0 million and is
collateralized by our personal property. We are required to
exhaust our borrowing capacity under Line A before we may
borrow under Line B. Interest under each line is computed
based, at our option, upon either the banks prime rate or
certain LIBOR rates. The agreement contains certain restrictions
and covenants, the most restrictive of which require us to
maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $105 million and a
maximum funded debt to EBITDA (as defined by the bank) ratio of
5.75:1 (which will decrease to 5.50:1 for the fiscal quarter
ending December 31, 2004 and remain at that ratio for the
remainder of the facilitys term). Line A does not
require any principal payments until its maturity date of
October 2006. As a result, any future borrowings under this line
in 2003 or 2004 would be reflected as a long-term liability.
Line B has a maturity date of October 2004. There were no
outstanding line-of-credit borrowings at December 31, 2003.
The bank credit facility also allows for a $4.0 million
term facility that is available to refinance, and would be
collateralized by, the Red Lion Hotel Yakima Gateway. We expect
that the term of the loan would be seven years.
In November 2003, we sold the Red Lion River Inn
to an unrelated third party for $10.8 million. We then
leased the property from the new owner. The lease has a 15-year
term and we have the option to extend the term for up to three
additional five-year periods.
As of December 31, 2003 we had debt
obligations of $151.4 million, of which 96.8%, or
$146.6 million, were fixed rate debt securities secured by
individual properties. There were no borrowings under the any
lines-of-credit during the fourth quarter of 2004.
29
In the first quarter of 2004 we completed a
public offering of $46 million of trust preferred
securities through WestCoast Hospitality Capital Trust, a
Delaware statutory trust sponsored by WestCoast. The securities,
which have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange, are
entitled to cumulative cash distributions at a 9.5% annual rate
and will mature on February 24, 2044. The trust used the
proceeds of the offering to purchase from us $46 million of
our junior subordinated debentures with payment terms that
mirror the distribution terms of the trust preferred securities.
After payment of underwriting commissions and expenses of the
trust preferred offering and before costs incurred directly by
us, we realized net proceeds from the offering of approximately
$44.2 million from the debenture sale. As discussed below,
we applied approximately $29.8 million of these proceeds to
redeem in full all outstanding shares of our Series A and
Series B preferred stock. We will use the balance of the
net proceeds for general corporate purposes.
Other Matters
At December 31, 2002, our assets held for
sale consisted of two office buildings in Spokane, Washington
and the WestCoast Kalispell Center Hotel and Mall with an
aggregate net carrying value of $34.4 million.
In June 2002, we entered into a purchase and sale
agreement with a potential buyer for the WestCoast Kalispell
Center Hotel and Mall. Subsequently, in July 2003, our company
and the buyer mutually terminated this agreement, at which time
we determined that it was no longer in our best interest to
continue to market the property for sale. As a result of this
decision, the net book value of the Kalispell Center Hotel and
Mall of $13.0 million was reclassified from assets held for
sale to property and equipment. A depreciation adjustment of
$520 thousand was recorded as of June 30, 2003,
reflecting non-cash expenses that would have been recognized had
the assets been classified as held and used since July 2002.
Following our strategy of divesture of non-core
assets, we remain committed to the sale of the two Spokane
office buildings. We are actively marketing the properties and
both are available for sale in their present condition at prices
management believes are reasonable compared to their respective
estimated fair values. However, we no longer believe that it is
probable that the sale of these assets will be completed in the
time frame permissible under generally accepted accounting
principles for classification of these assets as held for sale.
As a result of this decision, the net book value of these assets
of $21.7 million was reclassified from assets held for sale
to property and equipment. A depreciation adjustment of
$1.6 million was recorded in September 2003, reflecting
non-cash expenses that would have been recognized had these
assets been classified as property and equipment held and used
since December 2001.
On July 3, 2003 we paid a dividend totaling
approximately $1.3 million to the holders of record as of
June 30, 2003 of our Series A and Series B
Preferred Stock, representing all current dividends and
dividends that were previously accrued. We had not paid a
dividend due April 1, 2003 to the holders of our
Series A and Series B Preferred Stock because of
restrictions under our previous credit facility relating to
anticipatory covenant violations.
On October 1, 2003 we paid the regularly
scheduled dividend to the shareholders of record as of
September 30, 2003 of our Series A and Series B
Preferred Stock, totaling approximately $634 thousand.
On January 3, 2004 we paid the regularly
scheduled dividend to the shareholder of record as of
December 31, 2003 of our Series A and Series B
Preferred Stock, totaling approximately $634 thousand.
In connection with the offering of trust
preferred securities noted above, on February 24, 2004 we
paid accrued dividends to that date on both the Series A
and Series B Preferred Stock totaling $377 thousand.
We then immediately redeemed all of the outstanding and issued
shares of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock
for approximately $29.4 million, or $50 per share.
30
Overall, we are seeking to create a consistent
guest experience across all our hotels. During the year ended
December 31, 2003, we spent a total of $7.3 million on
capital improvement programs, including $5.6 million on our
hotels and restaurants. During 2004 we expect to spend
approximately an additional $11.5 million on capital
improvements with a focus in our hotels and restaurants segment,
primarily in guest contact areas. In addition to our owned
hotels, we are proactively working with our franchisees to
ensure they continue to meet Red Lion and WestCoast standards.
In September 2003, we exercised our lease option
to purchase the Red Lion Hotel Yakima Gateway for
$6.3 million. We completed the purchase of this hotel in
January 2004 utilizing certain proceeds from the sale of the Red
Lion River Inn.
In December 2003, we exercised our lease option
to purchase the Red Lion Hotel Bellevue for $12.0 million.
We expect to complete the purchase of this hotel during the
second quarter of 2004.
During 2003, franchise agreements for 17
franchised hotels and management contracts for two managed
hotels terminated. The owners of 13 of the franchised hotels
were affiliated with each other. Revenue related to the
terminated contracts totaled $1.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2002. We entered into three new
franchise agreements in 2003.
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations.
Significant portions of our revenues and profits are realized
from May through October.
The effect of inflation, as measured by
fluctuations in the U.S. Consumer Price Index, has not had
a material impact on our revenues or net income during the
periods under review.
The following tables summarize our significant
contractual obligations as of December 31, 2003 (in
thousands):
In March 2002, we sold a majority interest in an
office building resulting in net proceeds of $1.7 million
and a pre-tax gain of $5.8 million. We recognized
$3.0 million of the gain for the year ended
December 31,
31
In November 2003, we sold the Red Lion River Inn
to an unrelated third party for $10.8 million. We then
leased the property from the new owner. The lease has a 15-year
term and we have the option to extend the term for up to three
additional five-year periods.
Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates
A critical accounting policy is one which is both
important to the portrayal of our companys financial
condition and results of operations and requires
managements most difficult, subjective or complex
judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about
the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. All of our
significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to
our 2003 consolidated financial statements included in this
annual report. The accounting principles of our company comply
with GAAP. The more critical accounting policies and estimates
used relate to:
Revenue is generally recognized as services are
performed. Hotel and restaurant revenues primarily represent
room rental and food and beverage sales from owned, leased and
other consolidated hotels and are recognized at the time of the
hotel stay or sale of the restaurant services. Hotel and
restaurant revenues also include management fees we earn from
managing third-party owned hotels.
Franchise, central services and development fees
represent fees received in connection with the franchise of our
companys brand name as well as central purchasing,
development and other fees. Franchise fees are recognized as
earned in accordance with the contractual terms of the franchise
agreements. Other fees are recognized when the services are
provided and collection is reasonably assured.
Real estate division revenue represents leasing
income on owned commercial and retail properties as well as
property management income, development fees and leasing and
sales commissions from residential and commercial properties
managed by our company, typically under long-term contracts with
the property owner. Lease revenues are recognized over the
period of the leases. We record rental income from operating
leases which contain fixed escalation clauses on the
straight-line method. The difference between income earned and
lease payments received from the tenants is included in other
assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Rental income from
retail leases which is contingent upon the lessees
revenues is recorded as income in the period earned. Management
fees and leasing and sales commissions are recognized as these
services are performed.
The entertainment segment derives revenue
primarily from computerized event ticketing services and
promotion of Broadway shows and other special events. Where our
company acts as an agent and receives a net fee or commission,
it is recognized as revenue in the period the services are
performed. When our company is the promoter of an event and is
at risk for the production, revenues and expenses are recorded
in the period of the event performance.
Property and equipment is stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation. We also have investments in
partnerships that own and operate hotel properties. The
assessment of long-lived assets for possible impairment requires
us to make judgments, regarding real estate values, estimated
future cash flows from the respective properties and other
matters. We review the recoverability of our long-lived assets
when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
of an asset may not be recoverable.
We account for assets held for sale in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144
(SFAS No. 144). Our companys assets held
for sale are recorded at the lower of their historical carrying
value (cost less accumulated depreciation) or market value.
Depreciation is terminated when the asset is determined to be
held for sale. If the assets are ultimately not sold within the
guidelines of SFAS No. 144, depreciation would be
recaptured for the period they were classified on the balance
sheet as held for sale.
Our companys intangible assets include
brands and goodwill. We account for our brands and goodwill in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142 (SFAS No. 142). We expect to
32
Our other intangible assets include management,
marketing and lease contracts. The value of these contracts is
amortized on a straight-line basis over the weighted average
life of the agreements. The assessment of these contracts
requires us to make certain judgments, including estimated
future cash flow from the applicable properties.
We review the ability to collect individual
accounts receivable on a routine basis. We record an allowance
for doubtful accounts based on specifically identified amounts
that we believe to be uncollectible and amounts that are past
due beyond a certain date. The receivable is written off against
the allowance for doubtful accounts if collection attempts fail.
Our companys estimate for our allowance for doubtful
accounts is impacted by, among other things, national and
regional economic conditions, including the magnitude and
duration of an economic downturn in the United States.
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the dates of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN No. 46). In December 2003, the FASB issued
a revision to this interpretation (FIN
No. 46(r)). FIN No. 46(r) clarifies the
application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 to
certain entities in which equity investors do not have the
characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not
have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its
activities without additional subordinated financial support
from other parties. We adopted FIN No. 46 on July 1,
2003 for those provisions then in effect, and we will adopt FIN
No. 46(r) in its revised entirety for our financial
statements for periods ending after December 15, 2003 and
March 15, 2004, as applicable. As a result of the issuance
of FIN No. 46(r) and the accounting professions
application of the guidance provided by the FASB, issuer trusts,
like our subsidiary WestCoast Hospitality Capital Trust, are
generally variable interest entities. We have determined that we
are not the primary beneficiary under the trust, and accordingly
we will not consolidate the financial statements of the Trust
into our consolidated financial statements.
Based upon the foregoing accounting authority,
our consolidated financial statements prepared under GAAP
beginning with the quarter ending March 31, 2004 will
present the debentures issued to the trust as a related party
liability, and we will record offsetting assets relative to the
cash and common securities received from the trust in our
consolidated balance sheet. For financial reporting purposes, we
will record interest expense on the corresponding debentures in
our consolidated statements of operations.
In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149,
Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 149). SFAS
No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and
reporting for derivative instruments, including certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively
referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under
FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 149 is
effective for all contracts created or modified after
June 30, 2003 except for hedging relationships designated
after June 30, 2003. In addition, except as stated below,
all provisions of SFAS No. 149 should be applied
prospectively. The provisions of SFAS No. 149 that relate
to SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issues that have been
effective for fiscal quarters that began prior to June 15,
2003, should continue to be applied in accordance with their
respective effective dates. In addition, paragraphs 7(a)
and 23(a) of SFAS No. 149, which relate to forward
purchases or sales of when-issued securities or other securities
that do not yet exist, should be applied to both
33
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150,
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS
No. 150). SFAS No. 150 establishes standards on
the classification and measurement of certain financial
instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity.
The provisions of SFAS No. 150 are effective for financial
instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and
to all other instruments that exist as of the beginning of the
first interim financial reporting period beginning after
June 15, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
The following tables summarize the financial
instruments held by us at December 31, 2003 and 2002, which
are sensitive to changes in interest rates. At December 31,
2003, approximately 3.2% of our debt was subject to changes in
market interest rates and was sensitive to those changes. As of
December 31, 2003 we had debt obligations of
$151.4 million, of which 96.8%, or $146.6 million,
were fixed rate debt securities secured by individual
properties. There were no borrowings under the any
lines-of-credit during the fourth quarter of 2004.
The following table presents principal cash flows
for debt outstanding at December 31, 2003, by maturity date
(in thousands).
Outstanding Debt and Capital Lease
Obligations
The following table presents principal cash flows
for debt and capital leases outstanding at December 31,
2002, by maturity date (in thousands).
Outstanding Debt and Capital Lease
Obligations
34
See Item 15 of this annual report for
certain information with respect to the financial statements
filed as a part hereof, including financial statements filed
pursuant to the requirements of this Item 8.
Selected Quarterly Data (in thousands except
per share amounts)
Financial Statements
The 2003 Consolidated Financial Statements of
WestCoast Hospitality Corporation are presented on pages 36
to 65 of this annual report.
35
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of WestCoast Hospitality Corporation and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the three years
ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of WestCoast Hospitality
Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2003 and
2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for the three years ended December 31, 2003 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
February 2, 2004,
36
WESTCOAST HOSPITALITY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the consolidated financial statements.
37
WESTCOAST HOSPITALITY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the consolidated financial statements.
38
WESTCOAST HOSPITALITY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the consolidated financial statements.
39
WESTCOAST HOSPITALITY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the consolidated financial statements.
40
WESTCOAST HOSPITALITY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS (Continued)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
the consolidated financial statements.
41
WESTCOAST HOSPITALITY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
1. Organization
WestCoast Hospitality Corporation
(WestCoast or the Company) is a
NYSE-listed hospitality and leisure company primarily engaged in
the ownership, management, development and franchising of
mid-scale, full service hotels under its WestCoast and Red Lion
brands. As of December 31, 2003, the hotel system contained
71 hotels located in 12 states and one Canadian
province, with more than 12,300 rooms and
579,000 square feet of meeting space. The Company
managed 48 of these hotels, consisting of 27 owned
hotels, 15 leased hotels and six third-party owned hotels.
The remaining 23 hotels were owned and operated by
third-party franchisees.
The Company is also engaged in entertainment and
real estate operations. Through the entertainment division,
which includes TicketsWest.com, Inc., the Company engages in
event ticket distribution and promotion and presents a variety
of entertainment productions in communities targeted for hotel
market penetration. The real estate division engages in the
traditional real estate related services that the Company has
pursued since its predecessor was originally founded in 1937,
including developing, managing and acting as a broker for sales
and leases of commercial and multi-unit residential properties.
The Company was incorporated in the State of
Washington on April 25, 1978. The financial statements
encompass the accounts of WestCoast Hospitality Corporation and
all of its consolidated subsidiaries, including its 100%
ownership of Red Lion Hotels, Inc. and WestCoast Hotels, Inc.,
its approximately 98% ownership of WestCoast Hospitality Limited
Partnership (WHLP), and a 50% interest in a real
estate limited partnership. The financial statements also
include an equity method investment in a 19.9% owned real estate
limited partnership and certain cost method investments in
various entities included as other assets, over which the
Company does not exercise significant influence. During 2003 the
Company disposed of one equity method investment in a real
estate limited partnership. All significant inter-company
transactions and accounts have been eliminated upon
consolidation.
2. Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
The Company considers all highly liquid
investments purchased with an original maturity of three months
or less to be cash equivalents. At times, cash balances may be
in excess of federal insurance limits.
The Company maintains trust accounts for
client-owners of multiple real properties which it manages.
These cash accounts are not owned by the Company and therefore,
are not included in the consolidated financial statements. At
December 31, 2003 and 2002, these accounts totaled
approximately $2.7 and $2.1 million respectively.
In accordance with the Companys various
borrowing arrangements, at December 31, 2003 and 2002, cash
of approximately $5.0 million and $1.9 million,
respectively, was reserved for the future payment of insurance,
property taxes, repairs, furniture, and fixtures and is
reflected as restricted cash on the balance sheet.
The Company records an allowance for doubtful
accounts based on specifically identified amounts that the
Company believes to be uncollectible and those accounts that are
past due beyond a certain date. If actual collections experience
changes, revisions to the allowance may be required. After all
attempts to collect a receivable fail, the receivable is written
off against the allowance.
42
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following schedule summarizes the activity in
the allowance account for trade accounts receivable for the past
three years (in thousands):
Inventories consist primarily of food and
beverage products held for sale at the restaurants operated by
the Company, guest supplies, and gift shop merchandise.
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost, determined on a
first-in, first-out basis, or net realizable value.
Assets held for sale are accounted for in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, (SFAS No. 144). Assets
held for sale are recorded at the lower of their historical
carrying value (cost less accumulated depreciation) or market
value less costs to sell. Depreciation is terminated when the
asset is determined to be held for sale. If the assets are
ultimately not sold within the guidelines of SFAS No. 144,
depreciation would be recaptured for the period they were
classified on the balance sheet as held for sale. No assets were
considered held for sale at December 31, 2003.
Property and equipment are stated at cost.
Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful life of each asset, which ranges as follows:
The Company capitalizes interest costs during the
construction period for qualifying assets. During the years
ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company capitalized
approximately $84 thousand and $253 thousand of
interest costs, respectively. No interest was capitalized in
2003.
Management reviews the carrying value of
property, equipment and other long-lived assets on a periodic
basis. Estimated undiscounted future cash flows from related
operations are compared with the current carrying values.
Reductions to the carrying value, if necessary, are recorded to
the extent the net book value of the assets exceeds the greater
of estimated future discounted cash flows or fair value less
selling costs.
43
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Goodwill represents the excess of the estimated
fair value of the net assets acquired during business
combinations over the net tangible and identifiable intangible
assets acquired. Through December 31, 2001 goodwill was
being amortized over 20 to 40 years.
Brand name is an identifiable indefinite life
intangible asset that represents the separable legal right to a
trade name acquired in a 2001 business combination. The
remaining balance of intangible assets consists primarily of the
net amortized cost of lease, management and franchise contracts
acquired in business combinations. The costs of these contracts
are amortized over the weighted-average remaining term of
approximately eight years.
The following table summarizes the cost and
accumulated amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets
(in thousands):
44
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amortization expense related to intangible assets
for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was
approximately $798 thousand, $860 thousand, and
$649 thousand, respectively. Estimated amortization expense
for intangible assets over the next five years is as
follows (in thousands):
Goodwill attributable to each of the
Companys business segments at both December 31, 2003
and 2002 is as follows (in thousands):
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets,
(SFAS No. 142), which revised the accounting
for purchased goodwill and intangible assets. Under SFAS
No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite
lives are no longer amortized, but instead will be tested for
impairment annually and also in the event of an impairment
indicator. The Company evaluated the goodwill, finite and
indefinite life of intangible assets and determined that there
was no impairment during 2003 or 2002.
The adoption of SFAS No. 142 on
January 1, 2002, resulted in the elimination of goodwill
amortization of $855 thousand for both the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002. Net income and earnings per
share adjusted for goodwill amortization for 2002 and 2001
compared to 2003 is as follows (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
45
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other assets primarily includes purchase option
payments, amounts expended for deferred loan fees, straight-line
rental income, a note receivable and the Companys equity
method and cost method investments described in Note 1.
At December 31, 2003 and 2002 the Company
had deferred purchase option payments made pursuant to purchase
agreements for hotel properties which were being leased and
operated by the Company. Both of those options have been
exercised as described in Notes 11 and 18.
Deferred loan fees are amortized using the
effective interest method over the term of the related loan
agreement.
Cost method investments are carried at purchase
price, less any write-downs if necessary. Equity method
investments are carried at cost, adjusted for the Companys
proportionate share of earnings and any investment
disbursements. The Companys $2.5 million note
receivable at December 31, 2003 bears interest at 7.36%.
Monthly principal and interest is due until August 2007 when the
note is due in full.
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and
liabilities, along with the related income tax expenses or
benefits, for the expected future income tax consequences of
events that have been recognized in the Companys financial
statements. The deferred tax liabilities and assets are
determined based on the temporary differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in
which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. Certain
wholly owned or partially owned entities, including WHLP, do not
directly pay income taxes. Instead, their taxable income flows
through to the Company or to the respective owners of the entity.
Revenue is generally recognized as services are
performed. Hotel and restaurant revenues primarily represent
room rental and food and beverage sales from owned, leased and
other consolidated hotels and are recognized at the time of the
hotel stay or sale of the restaurant services. Hotel and
restaurant revenues also include management fees earned from
managing third-party owned hotels. Franchise, central services
and development fees represent fees received in connection with
the franchise of the Companys brand name as well as
central purchasing, development and other fees. Franchise fees
are recognized as earned in accordance with the contractual
terms of the franchise agreements. Other fees are recognized
when the services are provided and collection is reasonably
assured.
Real estate division revenue represents leasing
income on owned commercial and retail properties as well as
property management income, development fees and leasing and
sales commissions from residential and commercial properties
managed by the Company, typically under long-term contracts with
the property owner. Lease revenues are recognized over the
period of the leases. The Company records rental income from
operating leases which contain fixed escalation clauses on the
straight-line method. The difference between income earned and
lease payments received from the tenants is included in other
assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Rental income from
retail leases which is contingent upon the lessees
revenues is recorded as income in the period earned. Management
fees and leasing and sales commissions are recognized as these
services are performed.
The entertainment segment derives revenue
primarily from computerized event ticketing services and
promotion of Broadway shows and other special events. Where the
Company acts as an agent and receives a net fee or commission,
it is recognized as revenue in the period the services are
performed. When the
46
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Company is the promoter of an event and is at
risk for the production, revenues and expenses are recorded in
the period of the event performance.
Earnings or loss per common share-basic is
computed by dividing income applicable to common shareholders by
the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during
the period. Earnings or loss per common share-diluted is
computed by adjusting income applicable to common shareholders
by the effect of the minority interest related to operating
partnership units of West Coast Hospitality Limited Partnership
(OP Units) and increasing the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding by the effect of the
OP Units and the additional common shares that would have
been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares (stock
options and convertible notes) had been issued, to the extent
that such issuance would be dilutive.
As permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS No. 123) and Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure (SFAS No. 148), the Company
has chosen to measure compensation cost for stock-based employee
compensation plans using the intrinsic value method of
accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees and to provide the disclosure only requirements
of SFAS No. 123. The Company has chosen not to record
compensation expense using fair value measurement provisions in
the statement of operations.
Had compensation cost for plans been determined
based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the
plans, reported net income and income per share would have been
changed to the pro forma amounts below (in thousands, except per
share data):
47
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company generally expenses all costs
associated with its advertising and promotional efforts as
incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002
and 2001 the Company incurred $6.3 million,
$6.3 million, and $2.4 million, respectively of
advertising expenses.
Effective January 1, 2002 the Company
established the WestCoast Central Program Fund
(CPF), organized in accordance with the various
domestic franchise agreements. The CPF is responsible for
certain advertising services, frequent guest program
administration, reservation services, national sales promotions
and brand and revenue management services intended to increase
sales and enhance the reputation of the Company and its
franchise owners including the WestCoast and Red Lion branded
properties.
Contributions by the Company to the CPF for owned
and managed hotels and contributions by the franchisees, through
the individual franchise agreements, total up to 5% of room
revenue or can be based on reservation fees, frequent guest
program dues and other services. While the Company administers
the functions of the CPF, the net assets and transactions of the
CPF are not commingled with the working capital of the Company.
The net assets and transactions of the CPF are, therefore, not
included in the accompanying financial statements in accordance
with FASB No. 45, Accounting for Franchise Fee
Revenue.
For the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2002, the Company contributed $5.5 million and
$5.7 million to the CPF, respectively, for its owned and
managed properties. The Company recognizes those contributions
as operating expenses as incurred. At December 31, 2003 and
2002, the Company had a net current receivable from the CPF of
approximately $305 thousand and $223 thousand, respectively.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN No. 46). In December 2003, the FASB issued
a revision to this interpretation (FIN
No. 46(r)). FIN No. 46(r) clarifies the
application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 to
certain entities in which equity investors do not have the
characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not
have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its
activities without additional subordinated financial support
from other parties. The Company adopted FIN No. 46 on
July 1, 2003 for those provisions then in effect, and it
will adopt FIN No. 46(r) in its revised entirety for its
financial statements for periods ending after December 15,
2003 and March 15, 2004, as applicable. As discussed in
Note 18, in the first quarter of 2004 the Company completed
a public offering of $46 million of trust preferred
securities through WestCoast Hospitality Capital Trust
(the Trust). As a result of the issuance of FIN
No. 46(r) and the accounting professions application
of the guidance provided by the FASB, issuer Trusts, like the
Trust, are generally variable interest entities. The Company has
determined that it is not the primary beneficiary under the
Trust, and accordingly it will not consolidate the financial
statements of the Trust into its consolidated financial
statements.
Based upon the foregoing accounting authority,
the Companys consolidated financial statements prepared
under GAAP beginning with the quarter ending March 31, 2004
will present the debentures issued to the Trust as a related
party liability, and the Company will record offsetting assets
relative to the cash and common securities received from the
Trust in its consolidated balance sheet. For financial reporting
purposes, the Company will record interest expense on the
corresponding debentures in its consolidated statements of
operations.
In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149,
Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 149). SFAS
No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and
reporting for derivative instruments, including certain
derivative instruments embedded in
48
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
other contracts (collectively referred to as
derivatives) and for hedging activities under FASB Statement
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 149 is
effective for all contracts created or modified after
June 30, 2003 except for hedging relationships designated
after June 30, 2003. In addition, except as stated below,
all provisions of SFAS No. 149 should be applied
prospectively. The provisions of SFAS No. 149 that relate
to SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issues that have been
effective for fiscal quarters that began prior to June 15,
2003, should continue to be applied in accordance with their
respective effective dates. In addition, paragraphs 7(a)
and 23(a) of SFAS No. 149, which relate to forward
purchases or sales of when-issued securities or other securities
that do not yet exist, should be applied to both existing
contracts and new contracts entered into after June 30,
2003. The adoption of this standard has not had a material
effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150,
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS
No. 150). SFAS No. 150 establishes standards on
the classification and measurement of certain financial
instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity.
The provisions of SFAS No. 150 are effective for financial
instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and
to all other instruments that exist as of the beginning of the
first interim financial reporting period beginning after
June 15, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not
have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the dates of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified
to conform to the 2003 presentation. These reclassifications had
no effect on net income or retained earnings as previously
reported.
3. Property and
Equipment
Property and equipment is summarized as follows
(in thousands):
Depreciation expense for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was approximately
$11.7 million, $8.9 million, and $8.9 million,
respectively.
49
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In November 2003, the Company sold one of its
hotels to an unrelated party for $10.8 million. The net
proceeds, after repayment of debt directly related to the
property of $6.0 million and associated sales costs, are
being used to invest in other properties under a tax deferral
strategy. The Company then entered into an operating lease
agreement with the new owner which expires in November 2018 and
requires monthly payments of approximately $63 thousand. At
the Companys option, the lease term is renewable for three
five-year terms. The pre-tax gain on the sale-leaseback
transaction of approximately $7.0 million was deferred and
is being amortized into income over the period of the lease
term. During the year ended December 31, 2003 the Company
recognized $72 thousand of the deferred gain and the
remaining balance at December 31, 2003 was
$6.9 million.
In March 2002, the Company entered into an
agreement for the sale of an 80.1% interest in the WHC Building,
while retaining the management of the building, its lease of
space, and the remaining ownership interest. At the time of the
sale the cost and accumulated depreciation of this building was
$10.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively. The sale
of the building resulted in a pre-tax gain of $5.8 million,
of which $3.0 million was recognized as a gain on asset
disposition in 2002. Due to the Company retaining an investment
and a partial lease of the building, a portion of the gain is
being deferred over the six-year lease term. During the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company recognized
$286 thousand and $215 thousand, respectively, of the
deferred gain. As of December 31, 2003, the total deferred
gain remaining is $2.3 million.
Through the second quarter of 2003 the Company
leased certain equipment under capital leases. The remaining
balance under those leases was paid in full during 2003 and the
net book value was transferred from equipment under capital
leases to buildings and equipment. The prior year balance has
also been reclassified for consistency.
4. Assets Held
for Sale
At December 31, 2002, assets held for sale
consisted of two office buildings in Spokane, Washington and the
WestCoast Kalispell Center Hotel and Mall with an aggregate net
carrying value of $34.4 million.
In June 2002, the Company entered into a purchase
and sale agreement with a potential buyer for the WestCoast
Kalispell Center Hotel and Mall. In July 2003 the Company and
the potential buyer of the WestCoast Kalispell Center Hotel and
Mall mutually terminated their sales agreement, at which time
the Company determined that it was no longer in its best
interest to continue to market the property for sale. As a
result of this decision, the net book value of the WestCoast
Kalispell Center Hotel and Mall of approximately
$13.0 million was reclassified from assets held for sale to
property and equipment. A depreciation adjustment of $520
thousand was recorded as of June 30, 2003, reflecting
non-cash depreciation expense that would have been recognized
had the assets been classified as held and used since July 2002.
Continuing to follow its strategy of divesture
from non-core assets, the Company remains committed to the sale
of the two Spokane office buildings. It is actively marketing
the properties and both are available for sale in their present
condition at prices management believes are reasonable compared
to their respective estimated fair values. However, there can be
no assurances given that the sale of these assets will be
completed in the time frame permissible under generally accepted
accounting principles to permit the classification of these
assets as held for sale on the financial statements. As a result
of this decision, the net book value of the related assets of
approximately $21.7 million has been reclassified from
assets held for sale to property and equipment. A depreciation
adjustment of approximately $1.6 million was recorded in
September 2003, reflecting non-cash expenses that would have
been recognized had the assets been classified as property and
equipment since December 2001.
50
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. Other
Investments
The Companys investments in other entities,
included in other assets, are summarized as follows:
Beginning March 2002, the Company owned a 19.9%
interest in the WHC Building as discussed in Note 3. At
both December 31, 2003 and 2002 the investment balance was
approximately $1.2 million and the investment is accounted
for under the equity method of accounting.
Summarized unaudited financial information with
respect to the equity method investment in the WHC Building is
as follows (in thousands):
Through April 2003, the Company maintained a 0.3%
general partnership interest in a hotel property, which was also
accounted for under the equity method of accounting. At
December 31, 2002 the investment balance was
$937 thousand. Effective April 2003, the Company sold its
ownership investment in this hotel venture to an unrelated third
party for $350 thousand. In addition, the Company assigned
its interest in the management agreement to the same party in
exchange for a structured payment arrangement totaling
approximately $141 thousand with monthly payments through
January 2004. The carrying value of the Companys
investment at the date of sale was $934 thousand, resulting
in a loss on the transaction of $443 thousand, which is
included as a loss on asset dispositions in the accompanying
statements of operations.
The Company maintains a 6% interest in a limited
liability company, which is accounted for under the cost method.
Accordingly the Companys investment is increased or
decreased by contributions, distributions, or impairments only.
The Company also holds certain other sliver investments in real
estate ventures accounted for under the cost method. At both
December 31, 2003 and 2002 the aggregate balance of
investments accounted for under the cost method was $242
thousand. The Company wrote-off its 0.3% interest of
$73 thousand in another hotel partnership, because the
primary asset was sold in November 2002.
The Company has recorded income from these
investments during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002,
and 2001 of $119 thousand, $28 thousand, and
$92 thousand respectively. Additionally the Company has
recorded revenues from managing these properties of $115
thousand, $374 thousand and $382 thousand during the
years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively.
51
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. Long-Term
Debt
Long-term debt consists of mortgage notes payable
and notes and contracts payable, collateralized by real
property, equipment and the assignment of certain rental income.
Long-term debt is as follows (in thousands except monthly
payment information):
52
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On June 27, 2003, the Company secured term
debt of $55.2 million from Column Financial, Inc., a
Credit Suisse First Boston subsidiary. The debt is
collateralized by certain of the Companys hotel
properties, requires monthly payments based on a fixed interest
rate of 6.7% per annum and a 25-year amortization schedule,
and matures in full on July 11, 2013. In connection with
securing this term debt, the Company incurred loan fees and
other costs totaling $1.4 million which were capitalized
and are being amortized using the effective interest method over
the ten year period of the underlying promissory notes. A
portion of the proceeds from these new borrowings were used to
pay down the $51.5 million outstanding balance on the
Companys then existing credit facility.
53
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Contractual maturities for long-term debt
outstanding at December 31, 2003 are summarized by year as
follows (in thousands):
7. Notes Payable
to Bank
As discussed in Note 6, a portion of the
proceeds from the new term borrowings were used to pay down the
$51.5 million outstanding balance on the Companys
existing credit facility with U.S. Bank. The credit
facility agreement was then amended effective June 27,
2003, reducing the maximum borrowing amount to $4.0 million
from $58.5 million. At December 31, 2002 the
outstanding balance under this line-of-credit was
$52.1 million. As of the date of the amendment to the
credit facility, the balance of unamortized deferred finance
costs associated with the existing revolving credit facility was
$848 thousand. The amendment resulted in a 92% reduction of
borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility. As such,
in June 2003 the Company recorded a proportionate write-off of
the then remaining unamortized deferred loan costs totaling
$790 thousand. The U.S. Bank credit facility was
terminated by the Company in October 2003. The remaining
associated loan fees were then written off.
Any outstanding borrowings under the
U.S. Bank line-of-credit had interest based on the prime
rate or LIBOR plus a variable interest margin. At
December 31, 2002, the interest rate on outstanding
borrowings ranged from 3.94% to 4.75%. The weighted-average
interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 3.97% at
December 31, 2002. The credit facility was collateralized
by certain properties.
In October 2003, the Company entered into a new
primary revolving credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association (Wells Fargo). Through
December 31, 2003 the Company had not made any borrowings
under the credit agreement. The credit agreement provides the
Company with a revolving credit facility with a total of
$10 million in borrowing capacity. This includes two
revolving lines of credit: Line A allows for maximum borrowings
of $7.0 million and is collateralized by certain hotel real
estate assets as well as certain other property and equipment.
Line B allows for maximum borrowings of $3.0 million and is
collateralized by certain property and equipment. The Company is
required to exhaust its borrowing capacity under Line A
before it may borrow under Line B. Interest under both
lines is computed based, at the Companys option, upon
either the banks prime rate or certain LIBOR rates. The
agreement contains certain restrictions and covenants, the most
restrictive of which requires the Company to maintain a minimum
tangible net worth and a maximum debt to equity ratio.
Line A does not require any principal payments until its
maturity date of October 2006. As a result, any future
borrowings under this line in 2004 would be reflected as a
long-term liability. Line B has a maturity date of October
2004. The bank credit facility also allows for a
$4.0 million term facility that is available to refinance
the Red Lion Yakima Gateway Hotel acquired in January 2004. If
utilized, the Company expects that the term of the loan would be
seven years.
54
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
8. Stockholders
Equity
The Articles of Incorporation of the Company
authorize 50 million common shares and 5 million
preferred shares. The preferred stock rights, preferences and
privileges will be determined by the Board of Directors.
As discussed in Note 17, as part of the Red
Lion acquisition in 2001 the Company issued 303,771 shares
of Series A Preferred Stock and 303,771 shares of
Series B Preferred Stock. Both the Series A and
Series B preferred shares had $0.01 par, a $50 stated
value, and gave the holder certain preferences upon any
liquidation of the Company, including payment of $50 per
share plus any unpaid dividends before any payment could be made
to common stockholders.
In addition, the Series A shares included a
quarterly dividend requirement, cumulative at 7%, and were
redeemable at WestCoasts option for $50 per share
plus unpaid dividends. The dividend requirement increased to 12%
if the Company missed two dividend payments, or to 14% upon the
violation of certain restrictive covenants or after
January 30, 2005. The Series B shares included a
quarterly dividend requirement, cumulative at 10%, and were
redeemable at WestCoasts option for $50 per share
plus unpaid dividends. The dividend requirement increased to 15%
if the Company missed two dividend payments, or to 20% upon the
violation of certain restrictive covenants or after
January 30, 2008.
As a result of cancelled franchise agreements in
2002, 2,456 shares of Preferred Series A and B,
respectively, were cancelled totaling approximately $246
thousand. As a result of cancelled franchise agreements and
other settlements of franchise related fees in 2003,
7,197 shares of Preferred Series A and B,
respectively, were cancelled totaling approximately
$719 thousand. Aggregate dividends on the Series A and
Series B preferred stock for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 totaled $2.5 million and
$2.6 million, respectively.
As further discussed in Note 18, all of the
shares of Series A and Series B preferred stock were
redeemed subsequent to the balance sheet date.
During the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2002, 2,678 and 2,276 shares of common stock, respectively,
were issued to non-employee directors as compensation for
service.
9. Income
Taxes
Major components of the Companys income tax
provision for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and
2001 are as follows (in thousands):
55
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The income tax provisions shown in the
consolidated statements of operations differ from the amounts
calculated using the federal statutory rate applied to income
before income taxes as follows (in thousands):
Components of the net deferred tax assets and
liabilities at December 31, 2003 and 2002 are as follows
(in thousands):
The Company leases shopping mall space to various
tenants over terms ranging from one to ten years. The leases
generally provide for fixed minimum monthly rent as well as
tenants payments for their pro rata share of taxes and
insurance, common area maintenance and expenses associated with
the shopping mall. In addition, the Company leases commercial
office space over terms ranging from one to seventeen years.
Future minimum lease income under existing noncancellable leases
as of December 31, 2003 is as follows (in thousands):
Rental income for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 was approximately
$7.6 million, $8.0 million and $9.3 million
respectively, which included contingent rents of approximately
$166 thousand, $155 thousand and $174 thousand, respectively.
56
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has various operating leases, the
most significant are:
In June 2003, the Company completed the sale to
General Electric Capital Corporation of certain capitalized
software and equipment previously included in construction
in-process. The proceeds of approximately $2.7 million were
used to repay the outstanding balance on an interim note payable
to General Electric Capital Corporation in the same amount.
Certain other costs directly related to the software and
equipment were paid for directly by General Electric Capital
Corporation, totaling $451 thousand. WestCoast then entered
into an operating lease agreement with General Electric Capital
Corporation which expires in June 2005 and requires monthly
payments of approximately $52 thousand. At the option of
WestCoast, the lease term is renewable for three one-year terms.
No gain or loss was recorded on this sale-leaseback transaction.
As discussed in Note 3, in November 2003 the
Company sold one of its hotels to an unrelated party in a
sales-operating leaseback transaction. The lease expires in
November 2018 and requires monthly payments of approximately $63
thousand. At the Companys option, the lease term is
renewable for three five-year terms.
In October 1997, the Company began operating a
hotel in Yakima, Washington under an operating lease and
purchase option agreement. The lease agreement was for a period
of 15 years with two five-year renewal options. The Company
paid all operating costs of the hotel plus monthly lease
payments of $35 thousand through September 2003. Commencing
October 2003, the monthly lease requirement would have raised to
$52 thousand and increased by $5 thousand each year thereafter.
The Company agreed to a $1.0 million option payment which
allows the purchase of this hotel at a fixed price. One-half of
this option payment was paid in cash at the date the option
agreement was executed and the remaining $500 thousand was
paid in August 2002. As discussed in Note 18 the Company
exercised this option and the option payments made by the
Company were applied against the total purchase price.
The Company began operating a hotel in Bellevue,
Washington in January 2000 with an operating lease and purchase
option agreement. The lease agreement expired on
December 31, 2003. The Company paid monthly lease payments
of $28 thousand plus additional rent as defined in
the agreement. Additional rent includes hotel operating and
other costs. The purchase option was exercisable from July 2002
through January 31, 2004 at the Companys option. The
total purchase price of the hotel under this option is
$12.0 million. As further discussed in Note 18, the
Company exercised this option.
At December 31, 2001, the Company assumed a
master lease agreement which covered 17 hotel properties
including 12 which were part of the Red Lion acquisition. The
Company has entered into a sublease with Doubletree DTWC
Corporation whereby Doubletree DTWC Corporation will sublease
five of these hotel properties from the Company. The master
lease agreement requires minimum monthly payments of
$1.3 million plus contingent rents based on gross receipts
from the 17 hotels. The lease agreement expires in December
2020, but the Company has the option to extend the term for
three additional five year terms.
Noting that the Yakima hotel purchase has been
completed subsequent to the balance sheet date and assuming the
Company closes its purchase options for the Bellevue hotel in
2004, total payments due under all
57
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of the Companys leases at December 31,
2003, as adjusted for subsequent events, are as follows (in
thousands):
The above amounts are net of $9.9 million of
sublease income annually through 2020.
Total rent expense net of sublease income under
the leases for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and
2001 was $8.3 million, $7.7 million, and
$1.8 million respectively.
The Company had the following transactions with
related parties:
58
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the
Plan) was adopted by the Board of Directors in 1998 and
authorizes the grant or issuance of various option or other
awards. As currently amended in 2000, the Plan allows for a
maximum number of shares which may be awarded of
1,400,000 shares, subject to adjustment for stock splits,
stock dividends and similar events. The Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors administers the Plan and establishes
to whom, and the type and the terms and conditions, including
the exercise period, of the awards are granted.
Nonqualified stock options may be granted for any
term specified by the Compensation Committee and may be granted
at less than fair market value, but not less than par value on
the date of grant. Incentive stock options may be granted only
to employees and must be granted at an exercise price at least
equal to fair market value on the date of grant and have at most
a ten year exercise period. The maximum fair market value of
shares which may be issued pursuant to incentive stock options
granted under the Plan to any individual in any calendar year
may not exceed $100 thousand. Stock Appreciation Rights
(SARs) may also be granted in connection with stock
options or other awards. SARs typically will provide for
payments to the holder based upon increases in the price of the
common stock over the exercise price of the related option or
award, but alternatively may be based upon other criteria such
as book value. Other awards such as restricted stock awards,
dividend equivalent awards, performance awards or deferred stock
awards may also be granted under the Plan by the Compensation
Committee.
All options granted prior to 2003 were designated
as nonqualified options, with an exercise price equal to or in
excess of fair market value on the date of grant and for a term
of ten years. For substantially all options granted, fifty
percent of each recipients options will vest on the fourth
anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining 50% will vest
on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant. The vesting
schedule will change if, beginning one year after the option
grant date, the stock price of the common stock reaches the
following target levels (measured as a percentage increase over
the exercise price) for 60 consecutive trading days:
59
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock option transactions are summarized as
follows:
Remaining options available for grant at
December 31, 2003 were 573,991. At December 31, 2003,
options totaling 233,180 are exercisable at a weighted average
exercise price of $8.66.
The following table summarizes information about
the Companys outstanding stock options at
December 31, 2003:
In July 2002, the Company offered eligible option
holders the opportunity to exchange certain options for new
options. The new options offered were issued at fair market
value of the stock on or after the first business day that was
six months and one day after the date the original options were
cancelled in the exchange. On July 31, 2002, 571,661
options were cancelled pursuant to the terms of the offer. In
February 2003, the Company granted 261,251 new non-qualified
options. There was no impact on the Companys financial
condition and results of operations in 2002 or 2003 as a result
of this transaction.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated
on the date of grant using an option-pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2003,
2002 and 2001:
60
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The weighted-average life of options outstanding
at December 31, 2003 was 7.76 years. The
weighted-average fair value of all options granted during 2003,
2002 and 2001 was $1.47, $2.17, and $1.37 per share,
respectively. No options were issued in 2003, 2002 or 2001 that
were above market value. The weighted-average fair value and
exercise price for options granted at or below market value in
2003, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:
In connection with the Companys initial
public offering in 1998, the Company also granted 55,000
restricted shares of common stock to certain members of senior
management. Twenty percent of these shares were issued in 1998
and 1999. Twenty percent were to be issued in each subsequent
year provided such employee was an employee of the Company at
that time. Management stock grants in 2002, 2001 and 2000 were
canceled and paid in cash. The Company recorded compensation
expense of approximately $80 thousand and $56 thousand during
the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively,
associated with these grants.
In 1998, the Company adopted the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan to assist employees of the Company in acquiring a
stock ownership interest in the Company. A maximum of
300,000 shares of common stock is reserved for issuance
under this plan. The Employee Stock Purchase Plan permits
eligible employees to purchase common stock at a discount
through payroll deductions. No employee may purchase more than
$25 thousand worth of common stock under this plan in any
calendar year. During the years ended December 31, 2003,
2002 and 2001, 21,805, 19,902, and 24,139 shares were
purchased under this plan for approximately $99 thousand,
$102 thousand, and $107 thousand, respectively.
The Company and its employees contribute to the
WestCoast Hospitality Corporation Amended and Restated
Retirement and Savings Plan. The defined contribution plan was
created for the benefit of substantially all employees of the
Company. The Company makes contributions of up to 3% of an
employees compensation based on a vesting schedule and
eligibility requirements set forth in the plan document. Company
contributions to the plan for the years ended December 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001 were approximately $439 thousand, $435
thousand, and $225 thousand, respectively.
The following estimated fair value amounts have
been determined using available market information and
appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable
judgment is required to interpret market data and to develop the
estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented
herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company
could realize in a current market exchange.
The following methods and assumptions were used
to estimate the fair value of each class of financial
instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value.
Potential income tax ramifications related to the realization of
unrealized gains and losses that would be incurred in an actual
sale or settlement have not been taken into consideration.
The carrying amounts for cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, current liabilities and
variable rate long-term debt are reasonable estimates of their
fair values. The fair values of fixed-rate long-term debt and
capital lease obligations are based on the discounted value of
contractual cash flows. The discount rate is
61
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
estimated using the rates currently offered for
debt or capital lease obligations with similar remaining
maturities.
The estimated fair values of financial
instruments are as follows (in thousands):
The Company has four operating segments:
(1) hotels and restaurants; (2) entertainment;
(3) real estate and (4) franchise, central services
and development. Due to the timing of the Red Lion acquisition
on December 31, 2001, identifiable assets and capital
expenditures related to this acquisition are reported at
December 31, 2001. However, no operations were reported
until 2002. Corporate services and other consists primarily of
miscellaneous revenues and expenses, cash and cash equivalents,
certain receivables and certain property and equipment which are
not specifically associated with an operating segment.
The entertainment segment had inter-segment
revenues which were eliminated in the consolidated financial
statements. Management reviews and evaluates the operations of
the entertainment segment including the inter-segment revenues.
Therefore, the total revenues, including inter-segment revenues
are included in the segment information below. Management
reviews and evaluates the operating segments exclusive of
interest expense. Therefore, interest expense is not allocated
to the segments.
Selected information with respect to the segments
is as follows (in thousands):
62
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Overview
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Financing
Table of Contents
Assets Held for Sale
Preferred Stock Dividends
Table of Contents
Capital Spending
Acquisitions
Franchise and Management
Contracts
Seasonality
Inflation
Contractual Obligations
Less than
After
Total
1 year
1-3 years
4-5 years
5 years
$
151,437
$
5,667
$
13,142
$
11,314
$
121,314
124,143
6,476
12,952
12,840
91,875
7,935
2,561
3,365
2,009
$
283,515
$
14,704
$
29,459
$
26,163
$
213,189
(1)
Operating lease amounts are net of estimated
annual sub-lease income totaling $9.9 million annually.
(2)
The preferred stock was retired in full during
February 2004.
(3)
We are not party to any significant long-term
service or supply contracts with respect to our processes. We
refrain from entering into any long-term purchase commitments in
the ordinary course of business.
Asset Dispositions
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Thereafter
Total
Fair Value
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
5,056
$
7,746
$
4,047
$
4,344
$
4,648
$
120,738
$
146,579
$
146,579
$
611
$
652
$
697
$
370
$
1,952
$
576
$
4,858
$
4,858
(a)
At December 31, 2003 there were no
borrowings against our note payable to bank.
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Thereafter
Total
Fair Value
$
52,100
$
$
$
$
$
$
52,100
$
52,100
$
4,044
$
2,985
$
6,832
$
3,069
$
3,298
$
74,222
$
94,450
$
94,450
$
845
$
893
$
949
$
1,012
$
702
$
7,244
$
11,645
$
11,645
$
268
$
$
$
$
$
$
268
$
268
(b)
The interest rate on the note payable is based on
LIBOR plus a variable interest margin based on our funded debt
ratio. The interest margin can vary from 205 to 350 basis
points. At December 31, 2002, the interest margin was
275 basis points.
Table of Contents
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Unaudited
$
40,176
$
48,068
$
54,484
$
41,246
$
(385
)
$
5,754
$
7,238
$
(852
)
$
(2,734
)
$
2,871
$
4,569
$
(3,619
)
$
(1,769
)
$
1,793
$
3,232
$
(2,037
)
$
(0.19
)
$
0.09
$
0.20
$
(0.20
)
$
(0.19
)
$
0.09
$
0.20
$
(0.20
)
$
42,469
$
51,623
$
55,685
$
44,394
$
4,515
$
8,417
$
9,487
$
262
$
1,654
$
5,842
$
6,971
$
(2,091
)
$
1,070
$
3,780
$
4,510
$
(1,353
)
$
0.03
$
0.24
$
0.30
$
(0.15
)
$
0.03
$
0.24
$
0.29
$
(0.15
)
Table of Contents
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Table of Contents
2003
2002
(In thousands, except
share data)
$
8,121
$
752
4,952
1,949
9,306
9,559
2,140
2,040
34,408
2,137
2,693
26,656
51,401
264,039
241,255
28,042
28,042
14,412
15,188
20,076
20,824
$
353,225
$
356,710
$
6,990
$
6,773
4,849
6,173
775
695
253
198
8,069
8,494
5,667
4,889
52,100
268
26,603
79,590
145,770
101,206
9,279
2,626
16,761
16,261
2,623
2,911
201,036
202,594
3
3
3
3
29,406
30,125
130
130
84,196
84,083
38,451
39,772
152,189
154,116
$
353,225
$
356,710
Table of Contents
2003
2002
2001
(In thousands, except per share data)
$
163,101
$
173,320
$
99,495
3,642
4,137
3,213
7,980
7,430
7,497
8,914
9,001
10,114
337
283
314
183,974
194,171
120,633
142,145
148,675
74,560
1,518
1,990
1,796
6,974
6,343
7,258
4,815
4,778
4,734
313
222
183
13,032
10,517
10,323
390
(3,166
)
(5,103
)
392
14
85
855
169,579
169,373
94,691
2,640
2,117
1,896
172,219
171,490
96,587
11,755
22,681
24,046
(11,150
)
(10,717
)
(12,092
)
414
372
247
(339
)
20
(23
)
119
28
92
288
(8
)
(188
)
1,087
12,376
12,082
(132
)
4,369
4,503
1,219
8,007
7,579
(2,540
)
(2,577
)
$
(1,321
)
$
5,430
$
7,579
$
(0.10
)
$
0.42
$
0.59
$
(0.10
)
$
0.41
$
0.59
12,999
12,975
12,953
12,999
13,285
13,239
Table of Contents
Preferred Stock Series A and B
Common Stock
Additional
Additional
Paid-In
Paid-In
Retained
Shares
Amount
Capital
Shares
Amount
Capital
Earnings
(In thousands, except share data)
$
$
12,933,106
$
129
$
83,845
$
26,763
7,579
24,139
1
106
607,542
6
30,371
2,455
15
607,542
6
30,371
12,959,700
130
83,966
34,342
8,007
(1,061
)
(1,516
)
(2,456
)
(123
)
(2,456
)
(123
)
19,902
102
2,276
15
602,630
6
30,125
12,981,878
130
84,083
39,772
1,219
(1,046
)
(1,494
)
(7,197
)
(360
)
(7,197
)
(359
)
21,805
99
2,678
14
588,236
$
6
$
29,406
13,006,361
$
130
$
84,196
$
38,451
Table of Contents
2003
2002
2001
(In thousands)
$
1,219
$
8,007
$
7,579
13,032
10,517
11,178
390
(3,166
)
(1,353
)
(3,782
)
(616
)
927
9
500
1,921
2,240
(288
)
8
188
(119
)
(28
)
(92
)
14
15
15
338
1,053
397
(3,003
)
(827
)
(1,122
)
(168
)
(1,556
)
(71
)
(100
)
105
(7
)
569
(1,322
)
(393
)
217
1,046
129
(1,324
)
(693
)
1,448
100
(82
)
69
(350
)
(692
)
(64
)
11,338
14,306
16,368
(7,339
)
(10,708
)
(6,769
)
5,367
1,845
1,792
485
(17,816
)
177
207
(135
)
(1,310
)
(8,656
)
(22,928
)
Table of Contents
2003
2002
2001
(In thousands)
47,700
10,800
21,150
(99,800
)
(12,950
)
(73,400
)
55,200
74,400
2,658
(3,892
)
(4,257
)
(12,624
)
99
102
107
(2,561
)
(1,937
)
(268
)
(384
)
(534
)
(1,547
)
(848
)
(1,273
)
(248
)
(37
)
(129
)
(2,659
)
(9,511
)
7,697
7,369
(3,861
)
1,137
752
4,613
3,476
$
8,121
$
752
$
4,613
$
11,070
$
10,799
$
12,023
$
213
$
4,376
$
1,424
$
34,775
$
$
$
2,658
$
$
$
2,540
$
2,577
$
$
5,965
$
$
$
103
$
246
$
$
$
2,607
$
$
$
1,194
$
$
$
7,198
$
$
$
520
$
$
$
30,377
Table of Contents
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
$
587
$
420
$
49
338
1,053
397
181
(362
)
(886
)
(207
)
$
563
$
587
$
420
Inventories
Assets Held for Sale
Property and Equipment
25 to 39 years
2 to 20 years
5 to 15 years
15 years
Valuation of Long-Lived
Assets
Table of Contents
Goodwill and Intangible
Assets
(a)
Goodwill and intangibles with indefinite life are
not subject to amortization.
Table of Contents
Years Ending December 31,
$
796
$
796
$
761
$
521
$
520
Other
Goodwill
Intangibles
$
19,530
$
11,025
5,351
3,379
3,161
8
$
28,042
$
14,412
Table of Contents
Other Assets
Income Taxes
Revenue Recognition
Table of Contents
Earnings Per Common Share
Stock Based Compensation
Table of Contents
Advertising and Promotion
Central Program Fund
New Accounting Pronouncements
Table of Contents
Estimates
Reclassifications
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
December 31,
2003
2002
$
34,941
$
35,429
13,608
13,791
10,809
11,101
10,238
9,046
7,058
6,610
6,698
6,205
5,964
5,886
5,965
5,070
4,820
5,435
5,036
5,522
4,970
4,289
4,575
4,075
3,863
4,051
2,982
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Years Ending December 31,
Amount
$
5,667
8,398
4,744
4,714
6,600
121,314
$
151,437
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
December 31,
2003
2002
2001
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
$
369
34.0
$
4,208
34.0
$
4,116
34.0
(398
)
(36.7
)
(186
)
(1.5
)
(68
)
(0.6
)
(19
)
(1.7
)
106
0.9
96
0.8
261
2.2
(84
)
(7.7
)
241
1.9
98
0.8
$
(132
)
(12.1
)
$
4,369
35.3
$
4,503
37.2
10.
Operating Lease Income
Years Ending
December 31,
Amount
$
6,572
5,760
4,690
3,983
2,703
4,601
$
28,309
Table of Contents
11.
Operating Lease Commitments
Table of Contents
Years Ending
December 31,
Amount
$
6,476
$
6,476
$
6,476
$
6,476
$
6,364
$
91,875
12.
Related-Party Transactions
The Company recorded management fee and other
income of approximately $128 thousand, $129 thousand
and $154 thousand during the years ended December 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, for performing management and
administrative functions for entities which are owned by key
stockholders and management of the Company. The net assets and
transactions of these entities are excluded from the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
The Company received commissions for real estate
sales from entities which are owned or partially owned by key
stockholders and management of the Company totaling
$39 thousand, $54 thousand and $109 thousand for
the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. The net assets and transactions of these entities
are excluded from the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
During 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company held
certain cash and investment accounts in a bank and had notes
payable to the same bank. The banks chairman and chief
executive officer is a director of the Company. At
December 31, 2003 and 2002, total cash and investments of
approximately $590 thousand and $3.5 million,
respectively, and a note payable totaling approximately
$5.0 million and $5.5 million respectively, were
outstanding with this bank. Total interest income of
$1 thousand, $7 thousand and $18 thousand,
respectively, and interest expense of $313 thousand,
$174 thousand and $367 thousand, respectively, was
recorded related to this bank during the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. Additionally, the Company
is the real estate manager for the banks corporate office
building. During the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002
and 2001, the Company recognized management fee income of
$121 thousand, $117 thousand and $114 thousand,
respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2002, the Company received $115 thousand and
$51 thousand, respectively, in management fees and
$44 thousand and $24 thousand in leasing fees from the
WHC building, which as of March 2002, the Company owns a 19.9%
interest in the building.
The Company purchased product for use in the
hotels and restaurants from an entity owned by key shareholders
and management of WestCoast totaling $163 thousand,
$76 thousand and $43 thousand for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
Table of Contents
13.
Employee Benefit and Stock Plans
1998 Stock Incentive Plan
Stock Price
Percent of Option
Increase
Shares Vested
25
%
25
%
50
%
50
%
75
%
75
%
100
%
100
%
Table of Contents
Number of
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Expiration
Shares
Exercise Price
Per Share
Date
997,825
$
13.75
$
7.50-15.00
2008-2010
360,785
$
6.07
$
6.07
2011
(81,991
)
$
13.89
$
8.31-15.00
1,276,619
$
11.57
$
6.07-15.00
2008-2011
6,500
$
7.67
$
7.50-7.95
2012
(173,563
)
$
10.67
$
6.07-15.00
(571,661
)
$
15.00
$
15.00
537,895
$
8.29
$
6.07-15.00
2008-2012
346,230
$
5.42
$
5.26-5.98
2013
(58,116
)
$
6.09
$
5.26-15.00
826,009
$
7.24
$
5.26-15.00
2008-2013
2003
2002
2001
0%
0%
0%
25%
25%
22%
2.56%
4.60%
4.07%
4 years
4 years
4 years
Table of Contents
Weighted-Average
Weighted-Average
Fair Value
Exercise Price
2003
2002
2001
2003
2002
2001
$
1.47
$
2.17
$
1.37
$
5.42
$
7.67
$
6.07
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Defined Contribution Plan
14.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Table of Contents
December 31,
2003
2002
Carrying
Fair
Carrying
Fair
Amount
Value
Amount
Value
$
13,073
$
13,073
$
2,701
$
2,701
$
9,306
$
9,306
$
9,559
$
9,559
$
20,936
$
20,936
$
22,333
$
22,333
$
$
$
52,100
$
52,100
$
151,437
$
151,437
$
106,095
$
106,095
$
$
$
268
$
268
15.
Business Segments
Table of Contents
December 31,
2003
2002
2001
$
10,832
$
15,921
$
16,738
1,459
1,810
6,115
667
768
(237
)
2,098
7,098
3,954
(3,301
)
(2,916
)
(2,524
)
$
11,755
$
22,681
$
24,046
$
5,610
$
5,742
$
48,634
88
2,056
2,672
199
349
542
356
193
2,910
1,086
2,368
203
$
7,339
$
10,708
$
54,961
$
9,436
$
8,712
$
8,112
304
337
&nb