Definitive Proxy Statement

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o		Preliminary Proxy Statement
o		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ		Definitive Proxy Statement
o		Definitive Additional Materials
o		Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

 

THE BON-TON STORES, INC.

---

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

---

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ		No fee required.
o		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

	(1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)		Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)		Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)		Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)		Total fee paid:

	(1)		Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)		Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)		Filing Party:
	(4)		Date Filed:

THE BON u TON STORES, INC.

2801 East Market Street

York, PA 17402

www.bonton.com

 

May 5, 2009

 

Dear Shareholder:

 

You are cordially invited to attend our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the Company’s offices, 2801 East Market Street, York, Pennsylvania on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, beginning at 9:00 a.m. Enclosed is the official notice of meeting, the proxy statement, the proxy card and our 2008 Annual Report.

 

This year we are using the Securities and Exchange Commission rule that allows companies to furnish proxy materials over the internet. We are mailing to many of our shareholders a notice that the proxy materials, including our 2008 Annual Report, are available on our website rather than sending a paper copy of this proxy statement and our 2008 Annual Report. We believe this electronic proxy process will expedite shareholders’ receipt of proxy materials, conserve valuable natural resources and reduce the Company’s costs of printing and distributing proxy materials.

 

Your vote is important to us. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, please sign, date and return your proxy in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or vote by telephone or over the internet.

 

Sincerely,

 

Tim Grumbacher
Executive Chairman of the Board

THE BON u TON STORES, INC.
2801 East Market Street
York, PA 17402
www.bonton.com

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

THE BON-TON STORES, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

 

We are providing this proxy statement to solicit your proxy for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “meeting”) which will be held at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, June 16, 2009. The proxy materials, which consist of the Annual Report, the Notice of Annual Meeting, this proxy statement and the proxy card, are being made available to our shareholders on or about May 5, 2009.

 

This year, the Company is furnishing proxy materials over the internet pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. We are mailing to many of our shareholders a notice that the proxy materials are available on our website. The notice provides instructions on accessing the proxy materials and submitting your proxy on-line. The notice also provides instructions for requesting paper copies of the proxy materials, which are available free of charge.

 

We do not anticipate that any matters will be raised at the meeting other than those described in the notice. If any other matters come before the meeting, your proxies will be authorized to act in accordance with their best judgment.

 

When your proxy card is signed and returned, or you have submitted your proxy over the internet or by telephone, your shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions. If your proxy card is signed and returned without specifying choices, your shares will be voted “for” the Board nominees, “for” approval of The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan and “for” ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm.

 

You may revoke your proxy before its exercise by notifying the Secretary of the Company in writing, by delivering a properly executed, later-dated proxy card, by submitting your proxy again over the internet or by telephone or by voting in person at the meeting.

 

Your proxy is being solicited by the Board of Directors. We will bear the cost of this solicitation, including the charges of brokerage houses, nominees and fiduciaries in forwarding these materials to beneficial owners. This solicitation may be made in person, by telephone or by other means of communication by our directors, officers or employees.

 

References in this proxy statement to a year refer to our fiscal year, which is the 52 or 53 week period ending on the Saturday nearer to January 31 of the following calendar year (for example, a reference to 2008 is a reference to the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009).

VOTING PROCEDURES AND SECURITY OWNERSHIP

 

Shareholders of record at the close of business on April 17, 2009 are entitled to vote at the meeting. At that time, there were 15,278,271 shares of common stock and 2,951,490 shares of Class A common stock outstanding. The common stock and the Class A common stock vote together on all matters. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of Class A common stock are entitled to ten votes per share. There are no other classes of voting securities outstanding. In the election of directors, shareholders do not have cumulative voting rights.

 

The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of persons entitled to cast a majority of the shareholder votes will constitute a quorum.

 

With respect to the election of directors, the eight nominees receiving a plurality of the votes cast (that is, the eight nominees receiving the greatest number of votes) will be elected. A proxy marked “withhold” with respect to the election of a director will not be voted as to the director indicated, but will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum.

Approval of any other matter requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted to determine whether a quorum is present at the meeting but are not counted as a vote in favor of or against a particular matter. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a holder of record for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular matter because the holder of record does not have discretionary voting power as to that item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

 

If you own common stock in your own name, you are an “owner of record.” This means you may direct the persons named as proxies how to vote your shares. If you fail to vote, the proxies cannot vote your shares at the meeting.

 

You have four voting options:

 

 

If a broker, bank or other nominee holds your common stock for your benefit but not in your name, your shares are in “street name.” In that case, your bank, broker or other nominee will send you a voting instruction form to use in voting your shares. The availability of internet and telephone voting depends on their voting processes. Please follow the voting instruction form sent to you by your bank, broker or other nominee.

 

If you are a participant in The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. Retirement Contribution Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), your proxy will incorporate all shares you own through the 401(k) Plan, assuming all your shares are registered in the same name. Your proxy will serve as a voting instruction for the trustee of the 401(k) Plan. If you own shares through the 401(k) Plan and you do not vote, the plan trustee will vote your shares in the same proportion as shares for which instructions were received from other shareholders under the 401(k) Plan.

 

The Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards provide that if more than 50% of the voting power in a company is held by an individual, group or another company, the company is a “controlled” company. Bon-Ton is a “controlled” company because Tim Grumbacher, Executive Chairman of the Board, is the beneficial owner of shares of common stock and Class A common stock entitled to vote more than 50% of the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting. Mr. Grumbacher has indicated that he will vote “for” each of the nominees for director, “for” approval of The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan and “for” ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP. Consequently, the election of each nominee for director, the approval of The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP are assured.

Principal Shareholders

 

This table shows owners of 5% or more of the Class A common stock or common stock as of March 13, 2009. Each person listed has sole voting power and sole investment power as to the shares indicated unless otherwise noted.

 

 

 

 

 

The holders of the Class A common stock have entered into an agreement granting Tim Grumbacher (or his personal representative) the right of first refusal to acquire any shares of Class A common stock proposed to be transferred.

Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

 

This table shows, as of March 13, 2009, the holdings of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, the three other most highly compensated executive officers during 2008 (collectively, the “named executive officers”), each director, and all directors and executive officers as a group. Each person listed has sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to the shares indicated unless otherwise noted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Board proposes the following nominees for election as directors to hold office until the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their respective successors, if any, have been elected. Each is currently a director and has agreed to serve if elected. Should a nominee become unable or decline to serve before the meeting, the proxies may vote for a substitute recommended by the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board, unless the Board reduces the number of directors.

 

LUCINDA M. BAIER  — Director since 2007.  Age 44
Ms. Baier is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Movie Gallery, Inc., a home entertainment specialty retailer that operates approximately 3,300 stores in the United States and Canada under the brands Movie Gallery, Hollywood Video and Game Crazy. Prior to joining Movie Gallery, Inc. in July 2008, Ms. Baier served from 2006 as Chief Financial Officer of World Kitchen, LLC. From 2004 to 2005, Ms. Baier was President and Chief Operating Officer at Whitehall Jewelers, Inc., and from 2000 to 2004, she held senior management positions at Sears, Roebuck & Company.

 

BYRON L. BERGREN  — Director since 2004.  Age 62
Mr. Bergren has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Bon-Ton since August 2004. Mr. Bergren joined Bon-Ton in November 2003 as Vice Chairman and served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Elder-Beerman from February 2002 through August 2004.

 

PHILIP M. BROWNE  — Director since 2002.  Age 49
Mr. Browne has been Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Advanta Corp., one of the nation’s largest credit card issuers in the small business market, since June 1998. Prior to that, Mr. Browne was a partner at Arthur Andersen LLP, where he was employed for more than 15 years.

 

SHIRLEY A. DAWE  — Director since 2002.  Age 62
Ms. Dawe is a Corporate Director and President of Shirley Dawe Associates, Inc., a Toronto-based retail management consulting group, since 1986. Prior to 1986, she held progressively senior merchandising and marketing positions with the Hudson’s Bay Company, a Canadian national department store chain, for over 15 years. Ms. Dawe is a director of the National Bank of Canada and Birks & Mayors, Inc., a North American fine jewelry retail chain.

 

MARSHA M. EVERTON  — Director since 2003.  Age 57
Ms. Everton has been President of Marsha Everton LLC, a York, Pennsylvania-based consulting firm, since September 2006. She was President of The Pfaltzgraff Co., a casual dinnerware manufacturer, from its acquisition by Lifetime Brands, Inc., a multi-channel retail company, in July 2005 to August 2006, and was President and Chief Executive Officer of The Pfaltzgraff Co. from January 2002 until its acquisition by Lifetime Brands. Ms. Everton was Vice President of The Pfaltzgraff Co. for more than ten years prior. Ms. Everton is also a director of the National Retail Federation Foundation and holds an NACD Certificate of Director Education.

 

MICHAEL L. GLEIM  — Director since 1991.  Age 66
Mr. Gleim was Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of Bon-Ton from December 1995 to February 2002. From 1991 to December 1995 he was Senior Executive Vice President of Bon-Ton, and from 1989 to 1991 he was Executive Vice President of Bon-Ton.

TIM GRUMBACHER  — Director since 1967.  Age 69
Mr. Grumbacher has been Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Bon-Ton since February 2005. He served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Bon-Ton from August 1991 to February 2005. He was Chief Executive Officer of Bon-Ton from 1985 to 1995 and from June 2000 to August 2004. From 1977 to 1989 he was President of Bon-Ton.

 

TODD C. MCCARTY  — Director since 2007.  Age 43
Mr. McCarty was appointed Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources at Readers Digest effective March 1, 2008. From 2005 to February 2008, he served as Senior Vice President — Human Resources of Rite Aid Corporation. Prior to joining Rite Aid in 2005, Mr. McCarty was Senior Vice President — Human Resources of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. from 2000 to 2005.

 

The key documents that constitute our corporate governance framework are as follows:

 

 

Each of the committee charters and the Code of Ethical Standards and Business Conduct is available on our website at www.bonton.com by clicking on “Investor Relations,” then “Corporate Governance.”

 

The Company maintains a Code of Ethical Standards and Business Practices (the “Code of Conduct”) that sets forth the Company’s policies and expectations. The Code of Conduct, which applies to every director, officer and employee, addresses a number of topics, including conflicts of interest, relationships with others, corporate payments, disclosure policy, compliance with laws, corporate opportunities and the protection and proper use of the Company’s assets. The Code of Conduct meets Nasdaq’s requirements for a code of conduct as well as the SEC’s definition of a code of ethics applicable to the Company’s senior officers.

 

The Board of Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Bank, Browne, Hernquist and McCarty and Mmes. Baier, Dawe and Everton is an “independent” director as that term is defined in the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market. In determining independence, the Board of Directors carefully reviewed any possible related party transactions between Bon-Ton or any of its affiliates and each of the independent directors. From 2006 to July 2008, Ms. Baier was Chief Financial Officer of World Kitchen, LLC. In determining whether Ms. Baier is an independent director, the Board considered the Company’s transactions with World Kitchen and determined that purchases by the Company of merchandise from World Kitchen were made in arms-length transactions that were not material to either company. Further, the Board determined that Ms. Baier did not have any direct or indirect material interest in the transactions.

 

During 2008, the Board of Directors held ten meetings and took action by unanimous consent without a meeting twice.

 

No director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served while in office.

 

The Board has an Audit Committee, a Human Resources and Compensation Committee, a Governance and Nominating Committee, and an Executive Committee. The primary functions of each committee, its members, the number of times the committee met during 2008 and certain other information regarding each committee are described below.

 

Audit Committee

 

The current members of the Audit Committee are Philip M. Browne (Chair), Lucinda M. Baier and Robert B. Bank. The Board has determined that each of Mr. Browne and Ms. Baier is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules and the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Audit Committee is comprised entirely of “independent” directors under applicable SEC rules and Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards and operates under a charter that was adopted by the Board of Directors. This charter is posted in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at www.bonton.com.

 

The Audit Committee appoints and establishes the compensation for the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, approves in advance all engagements with the independent registered public accounting firm to perform non-audit services, reviews and approves the procedures used to prepare the Company’s periodic reports, reviews and approves the Company’s critical accounting policies, discusses the plans and reviews results of the audit engagement with the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm and oversees the Company’s accounting processes including the adequacy of its internal accounting controls. To assist it in carrying out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee is authorized to retain the services of independent advisors.

 

The Audit Committee met seven times during 2008.

 

Human Resources and Compensation Committee

 

The members of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee (referred to in this proxy statement as the “HRCC”) are Marsha M. Everton (Chair), Shirley A. Dawe and Todd C. McCarty. The HRCC is comprised entirely of “independent” directors, as defined by the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, and all members are “non-employee directors” under applicable SEC rules and “outside directors” under applicable Internal Revenue Service Rules. The HRCC operates under a charter that was adopted by the Board of Directors. This charter is posted in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at www.bonton.com.

 

The HRCC oversees the Company’s compensation strategy to assure that it promotes shareholder interests, supports the Company’s strategic objectives and provides for appropriate rewards and incentives for the Company’s management and employees. The HRCC reviews, evaluates and provides recommendations to the Board regarding the plans, policies and programs relating to the compensation of the Company’s principal executive officers, the general compensation policies of the Company, succession planning, management development, and termination policies and arrangements. In addition, the HRCC reviews and approves the structure of the Company’s bonus plans, administers the Company’s stock option plans and oversees the Company’s retirement, defined benefit and health and welfare plans.

 

At the end of each year, the HRCC evaluates the performance of the Executive Chairman of the Board, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and the other principal executive officers of the Company with respect to approved goals and objectives, and establishes the compensation levels for the principal executive officers, including base pay, annual incentive compensation, long-term incentive plan participation, entrance into an agreement regarding employment and any special or supplemental benefits. The HRCC also establishes compensation levels for any newly-hired principal executive officer. The compensation of the President and Chief Executive Officer is also

reviewed by the full Board of Directors. The HRCC establishes the corporate goals under the Company’s Cash Bonus Plan and has the authority to determine whether the requirements for receipt of a bonus should be waived.

 

The HRCC may delegate its authority to a subcommittee comprised solely of its members. To assist it in carrying out its responsibilities, the HRCC is authorized to retain the services of advisors. During this past year, the HRCC engaged Hewitt Associates to provide counsel on executive compensation matters. The nature and scope of services rendered by Hewitt Associates is described below:

 

 

The HRCC did not direct Hewitt Associates to perform the above services in any particular manner or under any particular method. The HRCC has the final authority to hire and terminate the consultant, and the HRCC evaluates the consultant periodically.

 

(See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 23 for additional discussion of the elements of executive officer compensation, and the processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation.)

 

The HRCC met 16 times during 2008.

 

Governance and Nominating Committee

 

The current members of the Governance and Nominating Committee (referred to in this proxy statement as the “Governance Committee”) are Michael L. Gleim (Chair), Marsha M. Everton and Thomas K. Hernquist. Mr. Gleim is not an “independent” director as set forth under the Nasdaq Stock Market listing standards. As discussed above, the Company is a “controlled company” and as such, the Company may elect, and has elected, not to have a Governance Committee comprised solely of independent directors. Mr. Gleim provides the Board with valuable insight with respect to both the governance of the Company and the nominations process, and, therefore, the Board believes that he should continue as a member, and Chair, of the Governance Committee.

 

The Governance Committee reviews, develops and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding various aspects of the Company’s governance processes and procedures. It also recommends candidates for election to fill vacancies on the Board, including renominations of members whose terms are due to expire. The Governance Committee is also responsible for making recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation of its non-employee members. The Governance Committee operates under a charter that was adopted by the Board of Directors. This charter is posted in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at www.bonton.com.

 

The Governance Committee met four times during 2008.

 

Executive Committee

 

The members of the Executive Committee are Tim Grumbacher (Chair), Shirley A. Dawe and Michael L. Gleim. The Executive Committee has the authority to act in place of the Board of Directors on specified matters.

 

The Executive Committee has the following responsibilities: to propose the Board agenda for each year and to refine the agenda prior to each Board meeting, to keep the members of the Board informed of pertinent issues that arise between regularly-scheduled quarterly Board meetings and to

act as a sounding board for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer when appropriate. The Executive Committee Charter under which the Executive Committee operates was adopted by the Board and is posted in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at www.bonton.com.

 

The Executive Committee met seven times during 2008.

 

The Governance Committee considers any appropriate recommendations for candidates for the Board. Any candidate recommended for the Board shall, at a minimum, possess a background that includes a solid education, sufficient business, professional or academic experience and the requisite reputation, character, integrity, skills, judgment and temperament and such other relevant characteristics, which, in the Governance Committee’s view, have prepared him or her for dealing with the multi-faceted financial, business and other issues that confront a board of directors of a corporation with the size, complexity, reputation and success of the Company.

 

The Governance Committee will consider shareholder recommendations for candidates for the Board from any shareholder who has been a continuous record owner of at least 3% of the common stock of the Company for at least one year prior to submission of the recommendation and who provides a written statement that the shareholder intends to continue share ownership through the date of the meeting at which directors are to be elected. Any such shareholder recommendation should be sent to the Governance and Nominating Committee, c/o Office of the Secretary, The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc., P.O. Box 2821, York, Pennsylvania 17405. No shareholder recommendations have been received since the 2008 shareholder meeting.

 

In addition, the Governance Committee considers potential candidates recommended by current directors, Company officers, employees and others. When appropriate, the Governance Committee may retain executive recruitment firms to assist in identifying suitable candidates. The Governance Committee screens all potential candidates in the same manner regardless of the source of the recommendation.

 

In nominating candidates to fill vacancies created by the expiration of the term of a member of the Board, the Governance Committee determines whether the incumbent director is willing to stand for re-election. If so, the Governance Committee evaluates his or her performance in office to determine suitability for continued service, taking into consideration the value of continuity and familiarity with the Company’s business.

 

The Company has adopted a policy that encourages Board members to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. Six members of the then ten-member Board attended the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

 

Any shareholder who wishes to communicate with the Board of Directors, or any individual director, may do so by directing correspondence which prominently displays the fact that it is a shareholder-board communication, to such director or directors, c/o Office of the Secretary, The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc., P.O. Box 2821, York, Pennsylvania 17405. Until and unless a procedure is adopted by a majority of the independent members of the Board whereby it may be deemed unnecessary or inappropriate to relay certain shareholder communications to the relevant parties, all shareholder communications will be relayed to the intended director or directors.

Compensation of Directors

 

Messrs. Grumbacher and Bergren are employees of the Company and are not paid any separate compensation for serving as directors. They are the only employees who serve as directors.

In 2008, each non-employee director received both cash compensation and stock compensation comprised of the following:

 

 

One of the Company’s non-employee directors, currently Robert B. Bank, serves as the Board’s representative on the committee that oversees the Company’s Retirement Contribution Plan. For his service on this committee, Mr. Bank receives $1,250 for each meeting attended.

 

Directors may defer all or any part of their cash compensation into additional restricted stock units.

 

The following table presents the compensation provided by the Company during 2008 to each non-employee director:

 

 

 

 

16,543 held by Ms. Baier

16,620 held by each of Messrs. Hernquist and McCarty

26,926 held by each of Mmes. Dawe and Everton and Messrs. Bank, Browne and Gleim

 

 

In December 2007, the Company adopted guidelines requiring each director to maintain an equity stake in Bon-Ton equal to three times the annual cash retainer paid to the director. This links the directors’ interests with those of other shareholders. Shares actually owned and restricted share units that are time-based count towards the equity ownership requirement. Each director is required to achieve this share ownership level by the later of five years after joining the Board or five years after adoption of the guideline. Accordingly, each non-employee director standing for election in 2009 must meet this guideline by December 2012.

 

All of the non-employee directors standing for election satisfy the guideline.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
VOTING “FOR” THE ELECTION OF
THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE

 

The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) was adopted by the Board of Directors on March 16, 2009 to replace the Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive and Performance-Based Award Plan (referred to in this proxy statement as the “2000 Plan”) that was originally approved by the Company’s shareholders in June 2000. The purpose of the Incentive Plan is to recognize the contributions made to the Company by its employees, consultants and advisors; to provide these individuals with additional incentives to devote themselves to the future success of the Company; and to improve the ability of the Company to attract, retain and motivate individuals upon whom the sustained growth and financial success of the Company depends.

 

The Incentive Plan provides for the grant of stock options, both non-qualified and incentive, to purchase shares of common stock (referred to in this proxy statement as “Options”).

 

The Incentive Plan also provides for awards (referred to in this proxy statement as “Awards”) of (i) shares of common stock subject to risk of forfeiture (referred to in this proxy statement as “Restricted Shares”), (ii) rights to receive common stock subject to restrictions (referred to in this proxy statement as “Restricted Stock Units”), (iii) rights to receive a number of shares or an amount in cash or a combination of shares and cash, based on the increase in the fair market value of the shares underlying the right during a stated period specified by the Award (referred to in this proxy statement as “Stock Appreciation Rights”), (iv) rights to receive a number of shares or an amount in cash or a combination of shares and cash, based on the fair market value of the shares and aggregate dividends underlying the right during a stated period specified by the Award (referred to in this proxy statement as “Phantom Stock”), (v) shares of common stock subject to vesting based on performance criteria (referred to in this proxy statement as “Performance Shares”) and (vi) rights entitling the recipient to receive credits for dividends that would be paid if the recipient had held a specified number of shares of common stock (referred to in this proxy statement as “Dividend Equivalent Rights”). Under the Incentive Plan, Options and Awards may be granted for up to an aggregate of 2,500,000 shares (exclusive of shares granted and thereafter cancelled).

 

The Incentive Plan will become effective immediately if approved by shareholders at the meeting. At that time, the 2000 Plan, originally set to expire on March 2, 2010, will be terminated and all shares available for issuance under the 2000 Plan, which are estimated to be approximately 125,000 shares, will become available for issuance under the Incentive Plan. The results of the vote to approve the Incentive Plan and the termination of the 2000 Plan will not affect any awards outstanding under the 2000 Plan.

 

Options and Awards, if any, that will be made to eligible participants in the Incentive Plan are subject to the discretion of the HRCC and, therefore, are not determinable at this time.

 

This summary is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed terms and conditions of the Incentive Plan, which is filed as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement. The Company intends to file a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to register the shares to be issued pursuant to the Incentive Plan. The key provisions of the Incentive Plan are as follows:

 

Number of Shares.   The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Incentive Plan is 2,500,000. The maximum number of shares will be adjusted to reflect certain changes in the Company’s capitalization. If any shares subject to any Option or Award expire or are forfeited, canceled or settled for cash without delivery of shares of common stock, the shares subject to such Option or Award will again be available pursuant to the Incentive Plan. The number of shares available under the Incentive Plan will also be increased by the number of shares that are subject to outstanding options or awards under the 2000 Plan that expire or are forfeited, canceled or settled

for cash without delivery of shares of common stock, to the extent such shares would have been added back to the total number of shares of stock available for issuance under the 2000 Plan. The closing sale price for a share of common stock on April 17, 2009 was $2.01, as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market.

 

Administration.   The Incentive Plan is administered by the Board of Directors, or, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, by a committee composed of two or more members of the Board of Directors (for purposes of this Proposal Two, the “Committee”). To the extent possible, and to the extent the Board of Directors deems it necessary or appropriate, each member of the Committee shall be a “non-employee director” under applicable SEC rules, and an “outside director” under applicable Internal Revenue Service Rules. The 2000 Plan presently is administered by the HRCC.

 

Eligibility.   All employees (including all executive officers), directors, consultants and advisors of the Company or its subsidiaries and affiliates are eligible to receive Options or Awards under the Incentive Plan.

 

Term of the Incentive Plan.   Assuming approval of the Incentive Plan at the meeting, the Incentive Plan will become effective June 16, 2009, and provides that no Options or Awards may be granted after March 16, 2019.

 

Options and Awards.   From time to time, at its discretion, the Committee may select eligible recipients to whom Options or Awards will be granted, determine when each Option or Award will be granted, determine the number of shares subject to such Option or Award and, subject to the provisions of the Incentive Plan, determine the terms and conditions of each Option or Award. The Incentive Plan allows the Committee to determine certain terms in a grant of Options or Awards, including terms regarding payment methods, vesting schedules, restrictions on restricted stock and the timing and conditions of the lapse of such restrictions, acceleration of expiration or termination dates, and imposing or removing restrictions on an Award.

 

Options.   Options granted under the Incentive Plan may be either incentive stock options (“ISOs”) or non-qualified stock options. ISOs are intended to qualify as “incentive stock options” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Unless an Option is specifically designated at the time of grant as an ISO, Options are non-qualified options.

 

Options are not transferable by the optionee except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. No Option granted under the Incentive Plan may be exercised unless at least six months has elapsed since the date of the grant.

 

The exercise price of the Options is determined by the Committee, provided that the exercise price of an ISO must be at least 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the Option is granted, or at least 110% of the fair market value if the recipient owns shares possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company. The aggregate fair market value, determined as of the time of grant, of the shares with respect to which an ISO is exercisable for the first time by the recipient during any calendar year (under all incentive stock option plans of the Company) may not exceed $100,000. The term of each Option is fixed by the Committee.

 

Maximum Grants.   The Incentive Plan provides that the maximum number of shares for which options may be granted to any single optionee in any fiscal year is 400,000 shares.

 

Termination of Options.   All Options terminate on the earliest of:

 

 

 

Payment for Options.   An optionee may pay for shares in cash, certified check or such other mode of payment as the Committee may approve, including payment in shares held by the optionee for at least six months.

 

No Repricing.   Option and Stock Appreciation Rights repricing (including reducing the exercise price of Options or replacing an award with cash or another award type) is prohibited without shareholder approval under the Incentive Plan.

 

Awards of Restricted Shares.   The Committee will determine the period, which under the Incentive Plan must extend for at least six months from the date of grant, during which the grantee may not sell, transfer, pledge or assign Restricted Shares (the “Restrictions”). Restrictions may lapse in installments, as determined by the Committee. The Committee may, at its sole discretion, waive any Restrictions in whole or in part. The Committee will determine the rights that grantees have with respect to Restricted Shares, including the right to vote Restricted Shares and the right to receive dividends paid with respect to Restricted Shares. In the event a grantee terminates employment with the Company for any reason other than death or disability, all Restricted Shares remaining subject to Restrictions will be forfeited by the grantee and canceled by the Company. In addition, the Incentive Plan contains special provisions regarding Awards that will be “Performance-Based,” as outlined in more detail below, in the discussion of Federal Income Tax Consequences.

 

Provisions Relating to a “Change in Control” of the Company.   Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Incentive Plan, in the event of a “Change in Control” of the Company, the Committee may take whatever action with respect to Options and Awards outstanding as it deems necessary or desirable, including acceleration of the expiration or termination date or the date of exercisability of an Option or removing any restrictions from or imposing any additional restrictions on outstanding Awards.

 

A “Change in Control” will occur if:

 

 

 

 

 

Amendment and Termination.   The Board of Directors may amend the Incentive Plan at any time, provided the Board may not (1) change the class of individuals eligible to receive an ISO, (2) increase the maximum number of shares as to which Options and Awards may be granted or (3) make any other change or amendment as to which shareholder approval is required in order to satisfy the conditions set forth in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act, in each case without obtaining shareholder approval within 12 months before or after such action. No previously granted Option or Award will be adversely affected by any such amendment without the consent of the optionee or grantee.

 

Federal Income Tax Consequences.   The following discussion is a summary of certain current federal income tax consequences of the issuance of Options and the acquisition of shares of common stock by exercising Options, or receiving Awards of Restricted Shares under the Incentive Plan, and does not present a complete analysis of all tax consequences which may be relevant to any particular recipient. It does not purport to discuss state or local income tax laws.

 

Options.   With respect to ISOs, for federal income tax purposes an optionee will not have taxable income upon grant or exercise. However, upon exercise of an ISO, an optionee will generally recognize income for alternative minimum tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price of the ISO and the fair market value of the shares received. Any gain realized on sale of the shares acquired upon exercise of an ISO will be treated as long-term capital gain, provided the optionee does not dispose of the shares for at least two years after the date of grant or within one year after the date of exercise. No gain or loss will generally be recognized by an optionee upon, nor will any deduction be allowed to the Company as a result of, the grant or exercise of ISOs.

 

In general, in the case of non-qualified stock options or ISOs as to which the foregoing holding period limitations have not been satisfied, an optionee will have taxable income at ordinary income rates upon exercise (or at the time of a sale of ISO stock which does not satisfy the holding periods) for the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value at the date of exercise or, if the optionee is subject to certain restrictions imposed by federal securities laws, upon the lapse of those restrictions, unless the optionee elects under Section 83(b) of the Code within 30 days after exercise to be taxed upon exercise. The amount of that difference will generally be a deductible expense to the Company.

 

The ability of the Company to deduct compensation expense is generally subject to limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code (applicable to compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to certain “covered” employees). Any income recognized as ordinary compensation income on the exercise of a non-qualified stock option should, however, be exempt from these Code limitations as “performance-based” compensation provided the option grant meets certain requirements. It is the Company’s intention to administer the Incentive Plan in accordance with all applicable “performance-based” compensation requirements, including administration of the Incentive Plan with

respect to “covered” employees by a committee of two or more “outside” directors (as that term is used in applicable IRS regulations) and to make Option grants to such employees with an exercise price that is at least equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. Under these circumstances, such Options should, on exercise, result in a deductible compensation expense that is exempt from Section 162(m) of the Code as “performance-based” compensation.

 

Restricted Shares.   For federal income tax purposes, the recipient of an Award will not recognize income and the Company will not be entitled to a deduction at the time of the Award because the Restricted Shares are subject to risk of forfeiture and are not transferable. When the risk of forfeiture and non-transferability restrictions lapse, the recipient will recognize ordinary income and the Company will be entitled to a deduction (subject generally to a $1,000,000 limitation on deductible compensation of certain employees of the Company as provided under Section 162(m) of the Code) in an amount equal to the then fair market value of the Restricted Shares.

 

Restricted Stock Units/ Stock Appreciation Rights/Phantom Stock.   For federal income tax purposes, there are no immediate tax consequences of receiving an award of Restricted Stock Units, Stock Appreciation Rights or Phantom Stock under the Incentive Plan. A grantee who is awarded any of these will be required to recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of shares issued to such grantee at the end of the vesting or restriction period or, if later, the payment date. Assuming the Company complies with applicable reporting requirements and with the restrictions of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Company will be entitled to a business expense deduction in the same amount and generally at the same time as the grantee recognizes ordinary income.

 

Dividend Equivalent Rights.   A grantee who receives Dividend Equivalent Rights will be required to recognize ordinary income for federal income tax purposes equal to any amount distributed to the grantee pursuant to the Award. Assuming the Company complies with applicable reporting requirements and with the restrictions of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Company will be entitled to a business expense deduction in the same amount and generally at the same time as the grantee recognizes ordinary income.

 

Performance-Based Awards.   The Committee may grant Awards that have vesting requirements linked to the attainment of one or more “performance targets” applicable to any such Award. In the event the grantee of any such Award terminates employment prior to the end of the “performance period” applicable to the Award, the grantee will forfeit his or her rights to the Award. In addition, in the event the “performance target” that applies to an Award is not attained by the end of the applicable “performance period,” all rights to the Award will also be forfeited. The Committee has discretion as to the determination of whether performance-based Awards will vest or be forfeited upon a change in control of the Company. The Committee also has the right to cause any performance-based Award to be forfeited, at its discretion, without regard to whether applicable performance targets are attained if the Committee determines that such a forfeiture is appropriate.

 

If performance-based Awards are granted, the Committee must establish one or more performance targets for each performance period, which may vary for different grantees. In all cases, the performance target(s) established with respect to any performance period will be established within the first 90 days of the performance period or, if shorter, within the first twenty-five percent (25%) of such performance period. Each performance target will be in the form of a goal as to which an objective method (or methods) is available for determining whether it has been achieved. In addition, the Committee will establish in connection with the performance targets applicable to a performance period an objective method for computing the portion of a particular performance-based Award that will be treated as vested as a result of attaining such performance target(s).

 

If performance-based Awards are granted, the performance targets established must be based upon one or more of the following business criteria (which may be determined for these purposes by reference to (i) the Company as a whole, (ii) any of the Company’s subsidiaries, operating divisions, business segments or other operating units, or (iii) any combination thereof): earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization; profit before taxes; stock price;

market share; gross revenue; net revenue; pretax income; net operating income; cash flow; earnings per share; return on equity; return on invested capital or assets; cost reductions and savings; return on revenues or productivity; loss ratio; expense ratio; combined ratio; product spread; or any variations or combinations of the preceding business criteria, which may also be modified at the discretion of the Committee to take into account extraordinary items or which may be adjusted to reflect such costs or expense as the Committee deems appropriate.

 

Performance-based Awards cannot be made in excess of the limitations established under the special performance-based provisions of the Incentive Plan. Specifically, no grantee may receive, individually or in aggregate under the Incentive Plan, performance-based Awards for Restricted Shares in excess of 2,500,000 shares.

 

Unlike Awards of Restricted Shares that vest solely by reason of a period of continuous employment, performance-based Awards are intended to qualify as “performance-based” compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code because vesting of the Awards is linked to bona fide performance targets established by the Committee consistent with the requirements set forth in the Stock Incentive Plan. As a consequence, it is anticipated that at the time a performance-based Award becomes vested, the value of the Restricted Shares will be included in the income of the grantee and will be deductible by the Company without regard to the limitations imposed on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code.

 

Election under Section 83(b) of the Code.   Except as provided below, an Award recipient may elect pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code to include the Restricted Shares in his income at their fair market value at the time of award, in which event the Company would be entitled to a corresponding deduction. Such election must be made within 30 days after the Award grant date. If this election is made, any appreciation in value recognized by the Award recipient on a subsequent disposition of the Restricted Shares will in general be taxed at capital gains rates and not as ordinary income. If, however, an Award recipient who makes a Section 83(b) election forfeits the Restricted Shares back to the Company, the recipient will not recognize a loss on such forfeiture. In some cases, the particular restrictions with respect to an Award may be such that an Award recipient will not be entitled to make the Section 83(b) election.

 

Code Section 409A.   The Company has structured the Incentive Plan with the intention that awards granted under the plan comply with Section 409A of the Code. To the extent a grantee would be subject to the additional 20% tax imposed on certain nonqualified deferred compensation plans as a result of a provision of an award under the Incentive Plan, the provision will be deemed amended to the minimum extent necessary to avoid application of the 20% additional tax.

 

Code Section 280G.   To the extent payments that are contingent on a change in control are determined to exceed certain Code Section 280G limitations on “golden parachutes,” the Code provides that these payments may be subject to a 20% nondeductible excise tax and the Company’s deduction with respect to the associated compensation expense may be disallowed in whole or in part.

 

The Board of Directors approved the Incentive Plan on March 16, 2009. Approval of the Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of common stock and Class A common stock.

 

See “Equity Compensation Plan Information” on page 47 for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
VOTING “FOR” THE BON-TON STORES, INC.
2009 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

 

The Audit Committee has recommended ratification of its appointment of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), which served as our independent registered public accounting firm in 2008, to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2009. If the shareholders do not ratify this appointment, another independent registered public accounting firm will be considered by the Audit Committee.

 

In making its selection of KPMG, the Audit Committee considered whether the non-audit services provided by KPMG are compatible with maintaining KPMG’s independence.

 

 

 

 

The Audit Committee is responsible for the pre-approval of all audit services and non-audit services performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. All of the fees shown in the chart above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may delegate to one of its members the authority to grant such pre-approvals, and any such approvals are presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

 

A representative of KPMG is expected to be present at the meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
VOTING “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT
OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Audit Committee is comprised of three independent directors. The members of the Audit Committee are not professionally engaged in the practice of auditing or accounting, and rely, without independent verification, on the information provided to them and on the representations made to them by management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

 

The role of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in its general oversight of the integrity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, for its accounting and financial reporting principles and for the establishment and effectiveness of internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. KPMG is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, expressing an opinion as to the conformity of such consolidated financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee on Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. KPMG has free access to the Audit Committee to discuss any matter it deems appropriate.

 

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and KPMG the audited consolidated financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and KPMG’s evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, “Communication with Audit Committees.”

 

KPMG also provided the Audit Committee with the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and the Audit Committee discussed KPMG’s independence with them.

 

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009.

 

Members of the Audit Committee:

 

Philip M. Browne, Chairperson

Lucinda M. Baier

Robert B. Bank

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Overview

 

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis primarily addresses the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the three other highest paid executive officers who are listed below. These five executive officers are referred to as the “named executive officers” throughout this proxy statement:

 

 

Our Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

 

The HRCC’s philosophy is to directly link an increasing portion of an executive officer’s compensation with corporate performance and in alignment with shareholder value and to decrease an executive officer’s base salary as a percentage of his total compensation as his scope of responsibility increases. The following are the objectives that guide the HRCC’s decisions regarding compensation:

 

 

Based on the foregoing objectives, the HRCC has structured annual and long-term executive compensation to provide incentives to executives to achieve the business goals set by the Company and reward the executives for achieving such goals.

 

Share Ownership Guidelines

 

In December 2007, the Company adopted share ownership guidelines for our executive officers. The guidelines help ensure that our executive officers maintain an equity stake in Bon-Ton, and by doing so, appropriately link their interests with those of other shareholders. Shares beneficially owned, including time-based restricted shares and time-based restricted share units, and vested stock options with an exercise price below the market price count towards the equity ownership requirement. Outstanding non-vested stock options, performance-based restricted shares and performance-based restricted stock units do not count towards the requirement. Executive officers are required to achieve these share ownership levels within five years of becoming an

executive officer, or by December 2012 for those who were executive officers at the time we adopted the guidelines. The guidelines are:

 

 

Share ownership requirements for fiscal 2008 were measured based on the average price of the Company’s common stock during the first six months of fiscal 2007. Share ownership requirements are reviewed annually by the HRCC.

 

Each of the named executive officers currently owns shares sufficient to meet the requirement with the exception of Mr. Byers. Mr. Byers is positioned to achieve the share ownership level in advance of the required date of December 2012.

 

Role of the HRCC in Compensation Decisions

 

The HRCC’s responsibilities include the following:

 

 

Role of Management in Compensation Decisions

 

The Chief Executive Officer annually prepares a review of his direct reports, including the named executive officers and other key executives, excluding the Executive Chairman, compared to pre-determined, HRCC-approved performance metrics. The total compensation for the respective executives, the performance appraisals and the recommendations made by the Chief Executive Officer are presented for HRCC approval.

 

Other members of management also support the HRCC in its work. Management assists the Chair of the HRCC in establishing the agendas for HRCC meetings and preparing materials for the review of HRCC members in advance of each meeting. With respect to most compensation and benefit matters, including compensation of the named executive officers excluding the Executive Chairman and the President and Chief Executive Officer, management provides recommendations to the HRCC. The HRCC relies on management and, as appropriate, the advice of outside experts to evaluate employee performance and to make recommendations for salary and bonus levels as well as for grants of stock options, stock awards and stock appreciation rights. Management also works with the HRCC to establish performance goals under the Company’s performance-based annual

incentive compensation program. Members of management who provide this support include Byron L. Bergren; Dennis R. Clouser, Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Corporate Procurement & Operations and Information Services; and J. Gregory Yawman, Divisional Vice President and Associate General Counsel, each of whom generally attend meetings of the HRCC. Each of them is excused from a meeting during deliberation and approval of matters regarding his own compensation and from regularly scheduled HRCC executive sessions.

 

Benchmarking

 

The HRCC compares salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term equity incentive values against all retail companies in Hewitt Associates’ Total Compensation Database (the “Compensation Peer Group”). In 2008, there were 45 retail companies included in the database with revenues ranging from $728 million to $77 billion in sales. Because of the large variance in size among the companies comprising the Compensation Peer Group, regression analysis was used to adjust the compensation data for differences in company sales. This adjusted value is used as the basis of comparison of compensation between the Company and the companies in the Compensation Peer Group.

 

The HRCC has determined that it is appropriate to deliver total compensation at approximately the 50th percentile of the Compensation Peer Group for each element of compensation. However, as the Company competes with many larger companies for the best executive-level talent, the HRCC may decide it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to provide compensation for selected positions that exceeds the targeted compensation levels depending on the circumstances, including the Company’s needs, market factors, the executive’s experience, the contribution of the executive to the Company, and in the HRCC’s view, the positive impact the executive may have on the Company as a whole.

 

In addition, in 2008, the HRCC reviewed proxy compensation data from specific retailers in its benchmarking effort with respect to compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. These retailers included Kohl’s Corporation; J.C. Penney Company, Inc.; Macy’s, Inc.; Dillard’s Inc.; Belk Inc. and Nordstrom, Inc. These companies were chosen because they are retailers with competitive assortments and a similar customer base as the Company. The HRCC recognizes that most of these retailers are larger in size than the Company, but the HRCC also believes that the Company competes directly with them for executive talent. The HRCC reviewed the compensation practices of, and the compensation packages provided by, these retailers. The data also provided context for ongoing deliberations of the HRCC.

 

Components of Named Executive Officer Compensation

 

The principal components of compensation for named executive officers are base salary, performance-based annual cash incentive compensation, long-term equity incentive compensation, perquisites, and retirement and other benefits. The HRCC seeks to achieve a mix of these components such that total compensation is competitive in the marketplace. The HRCC is transitioning the Company’s compensation program from its historical short-term orientation, which focused on base salary and annual incentive compensation, to a program with an increasing emphasis on long-term equity incentive compensation to better align the interests of the named executive officers with the interests of shareholders in long-term growth. The HRCC does not have a pre-established policy for allocation between cash and non-cash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation. Rather, it monitors the actual mix against market data and attempts to provide each named executive officer with a balanced compensation package that addresses retention and competitive requirements.

The following table shows the components of named executive officer compensation.

 

 

The HRCC has reviewed a summary, or “tally sheet,” with all components of compensation of the named executive officers, including base salary, performance-based cash incentive compensation, long-term incentive compensation, accumulated realized and unrealized stock option and restricted stock gains, the dollar value to the executive and cost to the Company of all perquisites and other benefits, and obligations under the Company’s supplemental executive retirement plans. The HRCC did not use the tally sheet in making individual pay decisions, but rather reviewed it to ensure the total package met the needs of both the Company and the executives. The HRCC believes the level of compensation of the Company’s named executive officers reflects the Company’s performance, and the total compensation to each of the named executive officers is appropriate.

Base Salary

 

The base salaries of the Company’s executive officers are determined by evaluating their roles and responsibilities and compensation data relative to the Compensation Peer Group. The base salary of each executive officer is reviewed annually. If appropriate, the Chief Executive Officer recommends salary increases for each of the executive officers other than himself and the Executive Chairman of the Board. The HRCC’s decision to increase base salary for any executive officer is based on the HRCC’s compensation philosophy and takes into specific account the level of responsibility of the executive officer, the Company’s performance, the executive officer’s individual performance and the executive officer’s compensation compared to similarly situated executives in the Compensation Peer Group.

 

Minimum base salaries for Tim Grumbacher, Byron L. Bergren, Anthony J. Buccina and Stephen R. Byers were established in employment agreements approved by the HRCC and, with respect to Mr. Bergren’s and Mr. Grumbacher’s employment agreements, the Board of Directors at the recommendation of the HRCC. These minimum base salaries were based on a variety of factors, including market data from the Compensation Peer Group and an evaluation of each person’s capacity to positively affect the Company’s performance. The HRCC decided that most current base salaries were properly aligned with competitors and more emphasis should be placed on variable compensation linked to corporate performance. The HRCC approved a $45,000 increase in Mr. Plowman’s base salary, which was increased based upon market considerations of chief financial officers’ salaries at comparable companies. There were no other increases in base salary for any of the named executive officers in 2008.

 

Performance-Based Annual Incentive Compensation

 

The Company has an annual incentive Cash Bonus Plan (the “Cash Bonus Plan”) in which the named executive officers participate. Awards of cash bonuses under this plan are variable, and the payout of any cash bonus under the plan is dependent upon the achievement of pre-determined Company performance goals which are pre-approved by the HRCC.

 

For 2008, the Cash Bonus Plan for the named executive officers focused on the achievement of two or three of the following goals:

 

 

The methodology utilized to determine the achievement level for GMROI dollars requires that total Company gross margin, total Company average inventory at cost and total Company sales are balanced. The GMROI dollar goals require achievement of Company sales at pre-determined levels related to the total financial goals of the Company, which is then multiplied by the approved gross margin return on investment rate for the Company. The GMROI formula is as follows: (1) the quotient of gross margin dollars divided by average inventory dollars at cost, (2) multiplied by sales dollars.

 

The HRCC assigns goals and weightings for each named executive officer depending on the capacity of the named executive officer to influence the goal and the named executive officer’s area of responsibility. Payment of any portion of a bonus under the Cash Bonus Plan is dependent upon the Company’s achievement of at least the “threshold” level of net income. If the threshold level of net income is not achieved, there is no bonus payout under any of the goals of the plan for that year. In addition, if the net income “threshold” is attained, but the “threshold” performance for a goal other than net income is not attained, the portion of the bonus attributable to such other goal is forfeited.

The HRCC reviewed and established competitive “threshold,” “target” and “maximum” payout potentials under the Cash Bonus Plan for each named executive officer. The following table sets forth (1) the approximate payouts, stated as a percentage of base salary, that could have been earned by each named executive officer under the Cash Bonus Plan for 2008, and (2) the Cash Bonus Plan performance goals and the weighting of such goals for each named executive officer for 2008.

 

 

None of the goals was achieved in 2008 and consequently no compensation was paid under the Cash Bonus Plan to the named executive officers.

 

In addition to bonuses that may be awarded under the Company’s Cash Bonus Plan, a cash bonus may be awarded at the discretion of the HRCC for extraordinary individual achievement or for other reasons, such as a signing bonus upon joining the Company or an executive extending the term of his employment agreement. No extraordinary bonuses were awarded to any of the named executive officers for 2008.

 

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

 

Another component of named executive officer compensation is long-term incentive compensation in the form of stock options, shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights. The HRCC annually reviews the performance and compensation of the named executive officers to determine whether annual grants of options or awards of restricted stock or RSUs are warranted. Option grants and awards of restricted stock and RSUs are made periodically at the discretion of the HRCC but generally are made within the first quarter of each fiscal year. Most grants and awards are made on the recommendation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, primarily to reward significant individual achievement and to motivate and retain key talent. The proportion of long-term equity incentive compensation in relation to base salary is a function of the named executive officer’s level of responsibility and capacity to enhance shareholder value.

 

The HRCC has decided that grants made to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer should be directly aligned to the short- and long-term performance of the Company. In addition, the Chief Executive officer and the other named executive officers are awarded restricted stock as a retention tool. The other named executive officers are also granted options to align their interests with those of shareholders.

 

Generally, the value of the grants and awards made to the named executive officers, excluding the Chief Executive Officer, have been distributed so that 60% of the value is granted as options and 40% of the value is awarded as time-based restricted stock. This proportionate weighting is consistent with the HRCC’s objectives. The compensation value to the executive of a grant of stock options depends solely on future stock price appreciation, thereby aligning the

interests of executives with those of shareholders. The compensation value to the executive of an award of restricted stock does not depend solely on future stock price but rather, whether the award will have value in the long-term, thereby encouraging retention.

 

The exercise price of options granted by the HRCC is usually set at the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market on the date of the HRCC meeting at which the grant is approved. In certain instances, the HRCC has set the exercise price at the closing price on a date in the future to allow time to notify the grantee of the option grant or to set the exercise price on the same date as the starting date of a new employee. If the HRCC sets an option exercise price based on the closing price on the Nasdaq Stock Market on a date in the future, the HRCC confirms that management does not anticipate any material announcements during the period from the HRCC meeting until such future date.

 

During 2008, the HRCC granted each of Messrs. Buccina and Byers an award of 10,000 time-based restricted shares and options to acquire 50,000 shares as reflected in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table on page 34. The HRCC granted Mr. Plowman an award of 7,000 time-based restricted shares and options to acquire 40,000 shares as reflected in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table on page 34.

 

Pursuant to the amendment of Byron L. Bergren’s employment agreement on July 19, 2007, the HRCC also awarded performance-based restricted stock to Mr. Bergren in 2008. Mr. Bergren received 365,854 performance-based restricted shares, half of which were subject to vesting based on achievement of Company performance goals for 2008, and half of which are subject to vesting based on achievement of Company performance goals for 2009. As the performance goals for 2008 were not attained, the restricted stock award relating to 2008 performance goals was forfeited. These awards of performance-based restricted stock reflect the HRCC’s objectives to link an increasing portion of compensation to Company performance and to align the interests of key executives with those of shareholders.

 

Perquisites and Other Benefits

 

The Company provides the named executive officers with perquisites and other benefits that the Company and the HRCC believe are reasonable and consistent with the Company’s objective to motivate and retain superior employees for key positions. The HRCC periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other benefits provided to named executive officers. Perquisites primarily consist of supplemental medical benefits, automobile allowances, relocation benefits and reimbursement of legal fees incurred in connection with the negotiation of employment agreements. Perquisites traditionally have not constituted significant portions of an executive’s compensation.

 

The named executive officers also participate in benefit programs available to employees generally, such as health and dental insurance, life insurance and long-term disability insurance.

 

Retirement Benefits

 

The named executive officers participate in The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. Retirement Contribution Plan, a tax-qualified defined-contribution plan. Under this plan, employees are able to contribute a portion of their annual salaries on a pre-tax basis and the Company may make discretionary retirement contributions to each eligible associate’s account. In past years, the Company generally has matched 30% of the first 6% of eligible compensation that is contributed to the plan. In addition to the matching contribution, the Company has provided a discretionary retirement contribution to each eligible employee in past years. For 2008, no associates, including the named executive officers, received either a matching contribution or a discretionary retirement contribution.

 

In connection with the acquisition of Carson’s in March 2006, the Company assumed the Carson Pirie Scott & Co. Pension Plan (the “Carson’s Pension Plan”). The Carson’s Pension Plan is a qualified defined-benefit cash-balance plan in which the only named executive officer who

participates is Anthony J. Buccina. The Carson’s Pension Plan was frozen to new participants in 2002 and all future benefit accruals were frozen in May 2006.

 

Additionally, in connection with the acquisition of Carson’s, a subsidiary of the Company assumed the Carson Pirie Scott & Co. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Carson’s SERP”). The Carson’s SERP was a nonqualified, unfunded supplemental retirement plan. The Carson’s SERP was terminated by the Company effective December 31, 2008. The only named executive officer who participated in the Carson’s SERP was Anthony J. Buccina. Pursuant to an employment agreement entered into on January 23, 2009, in the first quarter of 2009 the Company paid Mr. Buccina $2,931,821, the actuarial equivalent present value of his interest in the SERP. Additional detail on these plans can be found under the heading “Pension Benefits” on page 37.

 

Employment Agreements and Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

 

As discussed more fully below, the Company has entered into employment agreements with Tim Grumbacher, Byron L. Bergren, Anthony J. Buccina and Stephen R. Byers. The decisions to enter into employment agreements and the terms of those agreements were based on the Company’s need to motivate and retain talent for the long-term growth of the Company.

 

Following Mr. Grumbacher’s resignation as Chief Executive Officer in 2004, the HRCC determined it would be beneficial to the Company to continue Mr. Grumbacher’s employment as Executive Chairman of the Board, and both Mr. Grumbacher and the HRCC desired to evidence the arrangement in a written agreement. In December 2007, the HRCC approved an extension of Mr. Grumbacher’s term as Executive Chairman by two years, through January 2010. The HRCC’s key objectives in extending Mr. Grumbacher’s term as Executive Chairman included: (1) retaining Mr. Grumbacher’s experience and expertise as the Company moves from the integration of Carson’s to maximizing its potential as a larger retailer; and (2) maintaining stability of leadership and strategic focus.

 

The Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Bergren following the Company’s acquisition of The Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. The term of Mr. Bergren’s employment agreement originally ran through 2008. In July 2007, the Company and Mr. Bergren entered into an amendment of Mr. Bergren’s employment agreement that, among other matters, extended Mr. Bergren’s term as Chief Executive Officer through January 31, 2009 and provided for additional long-term incentive compensation. His employment agreement, as amended, provided that Mr. Bergren was to perform an important role with the Company from January 31, 2009 through February 5, 2010. In August 2008, the Company asked Mr. Bergren to continue in the role of Chief Executive Officer through February 5, 2010. On March 18, 2009, the Company entered into an amendment of Mr. Bergren’s employment agreement that provides for Mr. Bergren to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer through January 31, 2011 and to serve in an important role to be determined by the Board of Directors from February 1, 2011 through February 5, 2012. In addition, the Board has agreed to nominate Mr. Bergren as a member of the Board of Directors for the period through February 5, 2012. The HRCC’s key objectives in entering into the July 2007 and March 2009 amendments of Mr. Bergren’s employment agreement included: (1) retaining Mr. Bergren’s experience and expertise as the Company continues to move from the integration of Carson’s to maximizing its potential as a larger retailer, (2) maintaining stability of leadership and strategic focus and (3) facilitating the Company’s succession planning process and enabling Mr. Bergren to assist the HRCC and the Board of Directors with this process.

 

With respect to Mr. Buccina, the HRCC and management of the Company determined his services and merchandising expertise would be critical following the acquisition of Carson’s to ensure a smooth integration and to lead the development and execution of a comprehensive merchandising strategy for the combined Company. The HRCC and Company management determined it would be in the best interests of the Company to enter into an employment agreement to retain Mr. Byers due to his significant level of experience in retail and his direct experience with the

Carson’s stores, and for the long-term growth of the Company. In January 2009, the Company entered into new employment agreements with both Mr. Buccina and Mr. Byers, extending the term of their respective employment relationship with the Company.

 

The material terms of the employment agreements with the named executive officers are described under the heading “Summary of Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 39.

 

Under the employment agreements, the Company has agreed to provide severance compensation in the event of a termination, change in control or other triggering event. In addition, Keith E. Plowman, with whom the Company does not have an employment agreement, is a participant in the Company’s Severance Plan. These arrangements are designed to promote stability and continuity of senior management through a change in control of the Company. Stock options and restricted stock will generally vest upon a change in control. The Company adopted “single trigger” treatment for equity awards to retain, focus and motivate executives during change in control discussions and to be competitive with current market practice in order to attract the best talent. However, any cash severance benefits require a “double trigger” (including the executive’s separation from the Company under specified circumstances) for payment.

 

Information on these arrangements for the named executive officers is provided under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 44.

 

Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation

 

Section 162(m) of the Code limits the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to the Chief Executive Officer and certain executive officers unless specified criteria are satisfied. The HRCC reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m), and has generally designed the Company’s compensation program in a manner that permits compensation to be deductible. However, grants of restricted stock, when and if those grants vest for tax purposes, may create compensation for the grantee that is subject to the limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m). The HRCC may award non-deductible compensation when it believes such action would be in the best interests of the Company.

 

The HRCC of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussion, the HRCC recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

 

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee

 

Marsha M. Everton, Chair

Shirley A. Dawe

Todd C. McCarty

Summary Compensation Table

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options and awards of restricted stock generally vest over a number of years. Any vested options are usually forfeited 90 days after termination of the recipient’s employment, and any unvested shares of restricted stock and unvested options are usually forfeited upon termination of employment.

 

The table below provides information regarding grants of options and awards of restricted stock made during 2008 to the named executive officers under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan. As performance thresholds were not met, there were no cash payouts for performance under the Cash Bonus Plan or payouts for performance-based restricted shares during 2008.

 

 

 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End