|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTICE
OF 2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TIME
AND DATE
|
|
9:30
a.m., local time, on Wednesday, May 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLACE
|
|
The
Down Town Club
|
|
|
|
Public
Ledger Building
|
|
|
|
150
South Independence Mall West
|
|
|
|
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEMS
OF BUSINESS
|
|
(1)
|
To
elect three directors to serve for a term of three
years;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
To
ratify Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and
any adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RECORD
DATE
|
|
To
vote, you must have been a stockholder at the close of business on April
3, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROXY
VOTING
|
|
It
is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. You
can vote your shares via the Internet, by telephone or by completing and
returning the proxy card or voting instruction card sent to you. You can
revoke a proxy at any time before its exercise at the meeting by following
the instructions in the proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Thomas
M. Topley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
M. Topley
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Secretary
|
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
April 21,
2009
|
|
BENEFICIAL
MUTUAL BANCORP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROXY
STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL
INFORMATION
|
|
We
are providing this proxy statement to you in connection with the solicitation of
proxies by the Board of Directors of Beneficial Mutual Bancorp, Inc. for the
2009 annual meeting of stockholders and for any adjournment or postponement of
the meeting. In this proxy statement, we may also refer to Beneficial Mutual
Bancorp, Inc. as “Beneficial Mutual Bancorp,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or
“us.”
Beneficial
Mutual Bancorp is the holding company for Beneficial Bank, which has also
operated under the name Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank. In this proxy statement,
we may also refer to Beneficial Bank as the “Bank.”
We
are holding the 2009 annual meeting at The Down Town Club, Public Ledger
Building, 150 South Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on
Wednesday, May 20, 2009 at 9:30 a.m., local time.
We
intend to mail this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card to stockholders
of record beginning on or about April 21, 2009.
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR
THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 20, 2009
This
proxy statement and the Company’s 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders are
available at
http://ir.thebeneficial.com/annuals.cfm
.
On
this website, the Company also posts the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form
10-K, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including the
Company’s 2008 audited consolidated financial statements.
INFORMATION
ABOUT VOTING
Who
Can Vote at the Meeting
You
are entitled to vote your shares of Beneficial Mutual Bancorp common stock that
you owned as of April 3, 2009. As of the close of business on April 3, 2009, a
total of 82,052,553 shares of Beneficial Mutual Bancorp common stock were
outstanding, including 45,792,775 shares of common stock held by Beneficial
Savings Bank MHC. Each share of common stock has one vote.
The
Company’s charter provides that, until July 13, 2012, record holders of the
Company’s common stock, other than Beneficial Savings Bank MHC, who beneficially
own, either directly or indirectly, in excess of 10% of the Company’s
outstanding shares are not entitled to any vote with respect to those shares
held in excess of the 10% limit.
Ownership
of Shares; Attending the Meeting
You
may own shares of Beneficial Mutual Bancorp in one of the following
ways:
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Directly
in your name as the stockholder of record; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Indirectly
through a broker, bank or other holder of record in “street
name.”
|
If
your shares are registered directly in your name, you are the holder of record
of these shares and we are sending these proxy materials directly to you. As the
holder of record, you have the right to give your proxy directly to us or to
vote in person at the meeting.
If
you hold your shares in street name, your broker, bank or other holder of record
is sending these proxy materials to you. As the beneficial owner, you have the
right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote by
filling out a voting instruction form that accompanies your proxy materials.
Your broker, bank or other holder of record may allow you to provide voting
instructions by telephone or by the Internet. Please see the instruction form
provided by your broker, bank or other holder of record that accompanies this
proxy statement. If you hold your shares in street name, you will need proof of
ownership to be admitted to the meeting. A recent brokerage statement or letter
from a bank or broker are examples of proof of ownership. If you want to vote
your shares of Beneficial Mutual Bancorp common stock held in street name in
person at the meeting, you must obtain a written proxy in your name from the
broker, bank or other nominee who is the record holder of your
shares.
Quorum
and Vote Required
Quorum.
We
will have a quorum and will be able to conduct the business of the annual
meeting if the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock
entitled to vote are present at the meeting, either in person or by
proxy.
Votes
Required for Proposals.
At this year’s annual meeting, stockholders will
elect three directors to serve for a term of three years. In voting on the
election of directors, you may vote in favor of the nominees, withhold votes as
to all nominees, or withhold votes as to specific nominees. There is no
cumulative voting for the election of directors. Directors must be elected by a
plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting. This means that the nominees
receiving the greatest number of votes will be
elected.
In
voting on the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as
the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, you may vote in
favor of the proposal, vote against the proposal or abstain from voting. To
ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for 2009, the affirmative vote of a majority
of the shares represented at the annual meeting and entitled to vote at the
annual meeting is required.
Routine
and Non-Routine Proposals.
The rules of the New York Stock Exchange
determine whether proposals presented at stockholder meetings are routine or
non-routine. If a proposal is routine, a broker or other entity holding shares
for an owner in street name may vote for the proposal without receiving voting
instructions from the owner. If a proposal is non-routine, the broker or other
entity may vote on the proposal only if the owner has provided voting
instructions. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other entity is unable
to vote on a particular proposal and the broker or other entity has not received
voting instructions from the beneficial owner. The election of directors and the
ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for 2009 are currently considered routine
matters.
How
We Count Votes.
If
you return valid proxy instructions or attend the meeting in person, we will
count your shares to determine whether there is quorum, even if you abstain from
voting. Broker non-votes also will be counted to determine the existence of a
quorum.
In
the election of directors, votes that are withheld will have no effect on the
outcome of the election.
In
counting votes on the proposal to ratify the appointment of the independent
registered public accounting firm, abstentions will have the same effect as a
vote against the proposal.
Because
Beneficial Savings Bank MHC owns in excess of 50% of the outstanding shares of
Beneficial Mutual Bancorp common stock, the votes it casts will ensure the
presence of a quorum and determine the outcome of Proposal 1 (Election of
Directors) and Proposal 2 (Ratification of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm).
Voting
by Proxy
The
Company’s Board of Directors is sending you this proxy statement to request that
you allow your shares of Company common stock to be represented at the annual
meeting by the persons named in the enclosed proxy card. All shares of Company
common stock represented at the meeting by properly executed and dated proxies
will be voted according to the instructions indicated on the proxy card. If you
sign, date and return a proxy card without giving voting instructions, your
shares will be voted as recommended by the Company’s Board of Directors. The
Board of Directors recommends that you vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
FOR
each of the nominees for director; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
FOR
the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the
Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm.
|
If
any matters not described in this proxy statement are properly presented at the
annual meeting, the persons named in the proxy card will use their judgment to
determine how to vote your shares. This includes a motion to adjourn or postpone
the annual meeting to solicit additional proxies. If the annual meeting is
postponed or adjourned, your shares of Company common stock may be voted by the
persons named in the proxy card on the new meeting date, provided that the new
meeting occurs within 30 days of the annual meeting and you have not revoked
your proxy. The Company does not currently know of any other matters to be
presented at the annual meeting.
You
may revoke your proxy at any time before the vote is taken at the annual
meeting. To revoke your proxy, you must either advise the Corporate Secretary of
the Company in writing before your common stock has been voted at the annual
meeting, deliver a later-dated proxy or attend the meeting and vote your shares
in person. Attendance at the annual meeting will not in itself constitute
revocation of your proxy.
Instead
of voting by mailing a proxy card, registered stockholders can vote their shares
of Company common stock via the Internet or by telephone. The Internet and
telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’
identities, allow stockholders to provide their voting instructions and confirm
that their instructions have been recorded properly. Specific instructions for
Internet and telephone voting are set forth on the enclosed proxy card. The
deadline for voting via the Internet or by telephone is 3:00 a.m., Eastern time,
on Wednesday, May 20, 2009.
Participants
in the Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan
and/or the Beneficial Mutual Bancorp, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan
If
you participate in the Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank Employee Savings and Stock
Ownership Plan (the “KSOP”), you will receive a voting instruction card that
reflects all shares you may direct the trustee to vote on your behalf under the
KSOP. Under the terms of the KSOP, all credited shares of Beneficial Mutual
Bancorp common stock held by the KSOP trust are voted by the KSOP trustee, as
directed by plan participants. All shares of Company common stock held in the
KSOP trust that have not been credited to participants’ accounts, and all
credited shares for which no timely voting instructions are received, are voted
by the KSOP trustee in the same proportion as shares for which the trustee has
received timely voting instructions, subject to the exercise of its fiduciary
duties. If you participate in the Beneficial Mutual Bancorp, Inc. 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”), you will also receive a voting
instruction card for the purpose of directing the Equity Incentive Plan trustee
how to vote the unvested shares of Company common stock awarded to you under the
Equity Incentive Plan.
The
deadline for returning your voting instruction cards is May 13,
2009.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS
Director
Independence
The
Company’s Board of Directors currently consists of thirteen members. The Board
of Directors has adopted a resolution decreasing the size of the Board to twelve
members effective immediately prior to the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders.
Each of the Company’s directors is independent under the listing requirements of
the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc., except for Mr. George W. Nise, whom we employed
as President and Chief Executive Officer until January 1, 2007, and Mr. Gerard
P. Cuddy, whom we currently employ as President and Chief Executive
Officer.
Corporate
Governance Policies
The
Board of Directors has adopted a corporate governance policy to govern certain
activities, including: the duties and responsibilities of directors; the
composition, responsibilities and operations of the Board of Directors; the
establishment and operation of Board committees; succession planning; convening
executive sessions of independent directors; the Board of Directors’ interaction
with management and third parties; and the evaluation of the performance of the
Board of Directors and of the President and Chief Executive
Officer.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
The
following table identifies our standing committees and their members at December
31, 2008. All members of each committee are independent in accordance with the
listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. Each committee operates
under a written charter that is approved by the Board of Directors that governs
its composition, responsibilities and operation. Each committee reviews and
reassesses the adequacy of its charter at least annually. The charters of all
three committees are available in the Corporate Governance portion of the
Investor Relations section of our website (
www.thebeneficial.com
).
|
Director
|
|
Audit
Committee
|
|
Compensation
Committee
|
|
Corporate
Governance
Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward
G. Boehne
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Gerard
P. Cuddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank
A. Farnesi
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elizabeth
H. Gemmill
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
Thomas
F. Hayes
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Charles
Kahn, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Lewis
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Joseph
J. McLaughlin
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Michael
J. Morris
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George
W. Nise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald
F. O’Neill
|
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig
W. Yates
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Roy
D. Yates
|
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of Meetings in 2008
|
|
10
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Audit
Committee
The
Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of the Company’s
accounting, auditing, internal control structure and financial reporting
matters, the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial reports and the
Company’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The Committee is also
responsible for engaging the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm and monitoring its conduct and independence. The Board of Directors has
designated Frank A. Farnesi as an audit committee financial expert under the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mr. Farnesi is independent
under the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. applicable to
audit committee members.
Compensation
Committee
The
Compensation Committee approves the compensation objectives for the Company and
the Bank, establishes the compensation for the Company’s senior management and
conducts the performance review of the President and Chief Executive Officer.
The Compensation Committee reviews all components of compensation, including
salaries, cash incentive plans, long-term incentive plans and various employee
benefit matters. Decisions by the Compensation Committee with respect to the
compensation of executive officers are approved by the full Board of Directors.
The Committee also assists the Board of Directors in evaluating potential
candidates for executive positions. See
“Compensation
Discussion and Analysis”
for a discussion of the role of management and
compensation consultants in determining and/or recommending the amount or form
of executive compensation.
Corporate
Governance Committee
The
Company’s Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board of Directors in: (i)
identifying individuals qualified to become Board members, consistent with
criteria approved by the Board; (ii) recommending to the Board the director
nominees for the next annual meeting; (iii) implementing policies and practices
relating to corporate governance, including implementation of and
monitoring
adherence to corporate governance guidelines; (iv) leading the Board in its
annual review of the Board’s performance; and (v) recommending director nominees
for each committee.
Minimum
Qualifications.
The Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a set of
criteria that it considers when it selects individuals to be nominated for
election to the Board of Directors. A candidate must meet the eligibility
requirements set forth in the Company’s Bylaws, which include a requirement that
the candidate not have been subject to certain criminal or regulatory actions. A
candidate also must meet any qualification requirements set forth in any Board
or committee governing documents.
If
the candidate is deemed eligible for election to the Board of Directors, the
Corporate Governance Committee will then evaluate the following criteria in
selecting nominees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Contributions
to the range of talent, skill and expertise of the
Board;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Financial,
regulatory and business experience, knowledge of the banking and financial
service industries, familiarity with the operations of public companies
and ability to read and understand financial
statements;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Familiarity
with the Company’s market area and participation in and ties to local
businesses and local civic, charitable and religious
organizations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Personal
and professional integrity, honesty and reputation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
ability to represent the best interests of the stockholders of the Company
and the best interests of the institution;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
ability to devote sufficient time and energy to the performance of his or
her duties;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Independence
under applicable Securities and Exchange Commission and listing
definitions; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Current
equity holdings in the
Company.
|
The
Corporate Governance Committee also will consider any other factors it deems
relevant, including diversity, competition, size of the Board of Directors and
regulatory disclosure obligations.
With
respect to nominating an existing director for re-election to the Board of
Directors, the Corporate Governance Committee will consider and review an
existing director’s Board and committee attendance and performance; length of
Board service; the experience, skills and contributions that the existing
director brings to the Board; and independence.
Director
Nomination Process.
The process that the Corporate Governance Committee
follows to identify and evaluate individuals to be nominated for election to the
Board of Directors is as follows:
For
purposes of identifying nominees for the Board of Directors, the Corporate
Governance Committee relies on personal contacts of the committee members and
other members of the Board of Directors, as well as its knowledge of members of
the communities served by the Bank. The Corporate Governance Committee will also
consider director candidates recommended by stockholders in accordance with the
policy and procedures set forth below. The Corporate Governance Committee has
not previously used an independent search firm to identify
nominees.
In
evaluating potential nominees, the Corporate Governance Committee determines
whether the candidate is eligible and qualified for service on the Board of
Directors by evaluating the candidate under the criteria set forth above. If
such individual fulfills these criteria, the Corporate Governance Committee will
conduct a check of the individual’s background and interview the candidate to
further assess the qualities of the prospective nominee and the contributions he
or she would make to the Board.
Considerations
of Recommendations by Stockholders.
It is the policy of the Corporate
Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company to consider
director candidates recommended by stockholders who appear to be qualified to
serve on the Company’s Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance Committee
may choose not to consider an unsolicited recommendation if no vacancy exists on
the Board of Directors and the Corporate Governance Committee does not perceive
a need to increase the size of the Board of Directors. To avoid the unnecessary
use of the Corporate Governance Committee’s resources, the Corporate Governance
Committee will consider only those director candidates recommended in accordance
with the procedures set forth below.
Procedures
to be Followed by Stockholders.
To submit a recommendation of a director
candidate to the Corporate Governance Committee, a stockholder should submit the
following information in writing, addressed to the Chairman of the Corporate
Governance Committee, care of the Corporate Secretary, at the main office of the
Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The
name of the person recommended as a director candidate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
All
information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in
solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Regulation
14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
The
written consent of the person being recommended as a director candidate to
being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a
director if elected;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
As
to the stockholder making the recommendation, the name and address of such
stockholder as they appear on the Company’s books; provided, however, that
if the stockholder is not a registered holder of the Company’s common
stock, the stockholder should submit his or her name and address along
with a current written statement from the record holder of the shares that
reflects ownership of the Company’s common stock; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
A
statement disclosing whether such stockholder is acting with or on behalf
of any other person and, if applicable, the identity of such
person.
|
In
order for a director candidate to be considered for nomination at the Company’s
annual meeting of stockholders, the recommendation must be received by the
Corporate Secretary of the Company at least 30 days before the date of the
annual meeting.
Director
Compensation
The
following table provides the compensation received by individuals who served as
non-employee directors of the Company during the 2008 fiscal year. The table
excludes perquisites, which did not exceed $10,000 in the aggregate for any
director.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Fees
Paid
in Cash
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)(2)
|
|
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)(3)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|
R. Joseph Barnes
(4)
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
743
|
|
|
$
|
21,743
|
|
|
Edward
G. Boehne
|
|
|
55,400
|
|
|
|
24,032
|
|
|
|
13,657
|
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
|
|
95,050
|
|
|
Frank
A. Farnesi
|
|
|
65,100
|
|
|
|
24,032
|
|
|
|
13,657
|
|
|
|
2,304
|
|
|
|
105,093
|
|
|
Elizabeth
H. Gemmill
|
|
|
47,700
|
|
|
|
24,032
|
|
|
|
13,657
|
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
|
87,077
|
|
|
Thomas
F. Hayes
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
24,032
|
|
|
|
13,657
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
80,140
|
|
|
Charles
Kahn, Jr.
|
|
|
53,000
|
|
|
|
24,032
|
|
|
|
13,657
|
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
|
92,565
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Lewis
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
24,032
|
|
|
|
13,657
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
80,140
|
|
|
Joseph
J. McLaughlin
|
|
|
49,200
|
|
|
|
24,032
|
|
|
|
13,657
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
88,630
|
|
|
Michael
J. Morris
|
|
|
53,200
|
|
|
|
24,032
|
|
|
|
13,657
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
92,772
|
|
|
George
W. Nise
|
|
|
45,100
|
|
|
|
33,644
|
|
|
|
13,657
|
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
|
93,997
|
|
|
Donald
F. O’Neill
|
|
|
43,400
|
|
|
|
24,032
|
|
|
|
13,657
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
82,625
|
|
|
Craig
W. Yates
|
|
|
52,200
|
|
|
|
24,032
|
|
|
|
13,657
|
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
|
|
91,736
|
|
|
Roy
D. Yates
|
|
|
47,300
|
|
|
|
24,032
|
|
|
|
13,657
|
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
86,663
|
|
|
(1)
|
Reflects
the compensation expense recognized for financial statement reporting
purposes in accordance with SFAS 123(R) on outstanding restricted stock
awards for each director based upon the Company’s stock price of $11.86 as
of the date of grant. When shares become vested and are distributed from
the trust in which they are held, the recipient will also receive an
amount equal to accumulated cash and stock dividends (if any) paid with
respect thereto, plus earnings thereon. At December 31, 2008, the
aggregate number of unvested restricted stock award shares held in trust
was 35,000 for Mr. Nise and 25,000 for each of the other named
directors.
|
|
(2)
|
Reflects
the compensation expense recognized for financial statement reporting
purposes in accordance with SFAS 123(R) on outstanding stock option awards
for each of the non-employee directors, based upon a fair value of $3.37
for each option using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For
information on the assumptions used to compute fair value, see Note 18 to
the Notes to the Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual
Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2008. The actual
value, if any, realized by a director from any option will depend on the
extent to which the market value of the common stock exceeds the exercise
price of the option on the date the option is exercised. Accordingly,
there is no assurance that the value realized by a director will be at or
near the value estimated above. The aggregate outstanding stock options at
December 31, 2008 was 50,000 for each of the named
directors.
|
|
(3)
|
These
amounts represent the Philadelphia city wage tax that the directors
incurred in connection with their Board and committee fees. The Company
reimbursed the directors for the wage tax.
|
|
(4)
|
Retired
from the Board of Directors effective January 17, 2008 and served as
Director Emeritus until his death on March 30,
2009.
|
Cash
Retainer and Meetings Fees for Non-Employee Directors.
The following
table sets forth the applicable retainers and fees that will be paid to
non-employee directors for their service on the Bank’s Board of Directors during
2009. Directors do not receive any additional fees for their service on the
Boards of Directors of the Company or Beneficial Savings Bank
MHC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Retainer
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
Fee
per Board Meeting
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Annual
Committee Chair Retainer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
Committee
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
Executive,
Compensation and Corporate Governance Committees
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
Fee
per Committee Meeting
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Stock-Based
Deferral Plan.
In connection with our minority public offering in July
2007, we established a stock-based deferral plan for certain eligible officers
and directors. Under the terms of the plan, participants may elect to defer
compensation not yet earned and have that compensation invested in Beneficial
Mutual Bancorp common stock. Each participant’s deferral election must specify
the amount of compensation that is being deferred and the timing of the
distributions of the deferrals. Participants may elect to receive distributions
upon termination in a lump sum or installments over a period of one to five
years. Participants may also make a special change in control
election.
Board
and Committee Meetings
During
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company held 11
meetings. No director attended fewer than 75% of the total meetings of the
Company’s Board of Directors and the committees on which such individual served
during fiscal 2008.
Director
Attendance at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
The
Board of Directors encourages each director to attend the Company’s annual
meeting of stockholders. All of the Company’s directors attended the Company’s
2008 annual meeting of stockholders.
Code
of Ethics and Business Conduct
Beneficial
Mutual Bancorp has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that is
designed to ensure that the Company’s directors and employees meet the highest
standards of ethical conduct. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which
applies to all employees and directors, addresses conflicts of interest, the
treatment of confidential information, general employee conduct and compliance
with applicable laws, rules and regulations. In addition, the Code of Ethics and
Business Conduct is designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical
conduct, the avoidance of conflicts of interest, full and accurate disclosure
and compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. A copy of the
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available in the Corporate Governance
portion of the Investor Relations section of our website (
www.thebeneficial.com
).
AUDIT-RELATED
MATTERS
Report
of the Audit Committee
The
Company’s management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and
financial reporting process. The Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the
Company’s consolidated financial statements and issuing an opinion on the
conformity of those financial statements with generally accepted accounting
principles. The independent registered public accounting firm is also
responsible for issuing an attestation report on management’s assessment of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee
oversees the Company’s internal controls and financial reporting process on
behalf of the Board of Directors.
In
this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management
and the independent registered public accounting firm. Management represented to
the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and the
Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements
with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit
Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm
matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as
amended (AICPA,
Professional
Standards
, Vol. 1. AU Section 380), as adopted by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T, including the quality, and not just
the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of
significant judgments and the clarity of the disclosures in the financial
statements.
In
addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the
letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by the
applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications
with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the
independent registered public accounting firm the firm’s independence from the
Company and its management. In concluding that the registered public accounting
firm is independent, the Audit Committee considered, among other factors,
whether the non-audit services provided by the firm were compatible with its
independence.
The
Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Audit Committee
meets with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without
management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their
evaluation of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the
Company’s financial reporting.
In
performing all of these functions, the Audit Committee acts only in an oversight
capacity. In its oversight role, the Audit Committee relies on the work and
assurances of the Company’s management, which has the primary responsibility for
financial statements and reports, and of the independent registered public
accounting firm who, in their report, express an opinion on the conformity of
the Company’s financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles.
The Audit Committee’s oversight does not provide it with an independent basis to
determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial
reporting principles or policies, or appropriate internal controls and
procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and
applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, the Audit Committee’s
considerations and discussions with management and the independent registered
public accounting firm do not assure that the Company’s financial statements are
presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, that the
audit of the Company’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards or that the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm is “independent.”
In
reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the
audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee also has approved,
subject to stockholder ratification, the selection of the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009.
Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors of
Beneficial
Mutual Bancorp, Inc.
Frank A.
Farnesi, Chairman
Elizabeth
H. Gemmill
Joseph J.
McLaughlin
Michael
J. Morris
Donald F.
O’Neill
Craig W.
Yates
Roy D.
Yates
Audit
Fees
Audit
Fees.
The following table sets forth the fees billed to the Company for
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 by Deloitte & Touche
LLP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Audit Fees
(1)
|
|
$
|
439,155
|
|
|
$
|
574,550
|
|
|
Audit Related Fees
(2)
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
664,165
|
|
|
Tax
Fees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual
consolidated financial statements and review of consolidated financial
statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, or services
normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings
(
i.e.,
attest services required by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act or Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), including
out-of-pocket expenses.
|
|
|
(2)
|
For
2007, includes $628,175 related to the Company’s minority stock offering
and related securities registration statement and $25,990 in connection
with the filing of a Form 8-K/A relating to the Company’s acquisition of
FMS Financial
Corporation.
|
Policy
on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of
the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
The Audit Committee is
responsible for appointing, setting the compensation and overseeing the work of
the independent registered public accounting firm. In accordance with its
charter, the Audit Committee approves, in advance, all audit and permissible
non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditor. Such approval
process ensures that the external auditor does not provide any non-audit
services to the Company that are prohibited by law or
regulation.
In
addition, the Audit Committee has established a policy regarding pre-approval of
all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent
registered public accounting firm. Requests for services by the independent
registered public accounting firm for compliance with the auditor services
policy must be specific as to the particular services to be provided. The
request may be made with respect to either specific services or a type of
service for predictable or recurring services. During the year ended December
31, 2008, all services were approved, in advance, by the Audit Committee in
compliance with these procedures.
REPORT
OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The
Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis that is required by the rules established by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Based on such review and discussion, the Compensation
Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement. See
“Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
.
”
Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of
Beneficial
Mutual Bancorp, Inc.
Frank A.
Farnesi, Chairman
Edward G.
Boehne
Thomas F.
Hayes
Charles
Kahn, Jr.
Thomas J.
Lewis
Donald F.
O’Neill
Roy D.
Yates
STOCK
OWNERSHIP
The
following table provides information as of April 3, 2009 with respect to persons
known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s
outstanding shares of common stock. A person may be considered to own any shares
of common stock over which he or she has, directly or indirectly, sole or shared
voting or investment power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
and Address
|
|
|
Number
of Shares
Owned
|
|
|
Percent
of Common
Stock
Outstanding
|
|
|
Beneficial
Savings Bank MHC
510
Walnut Street
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19106
|
|
|
45,792,775
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
%
|
The
following table provides information about the shares of Company common stock
that may be considered to be owned by each director of the Company, each
executive officer named in
“Executive
Compensation—Summary Compensation Table”
and by all directors and
executive officers of the Company as a group as of April 3, 2009. A person may
be considered to own any shares of common stock over which he or she has,
directly or indirectly, sole or shared voting or investment power. Unless
otherwise indicated, each of the named individuals has sole voting and
investment power with respect to the shares shown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
|
Number
of Shares
Owned
(1)
|
|
|
Percent
of
Common
Stock
Outstanding
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward
G. Boehne
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Gerard
P. Cuddy
|
|
|
137,496
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Frank
A. Farnesi
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Elizabeth
H. Gemmill
|
|
|
45,500
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Thomas
F. Hayes
|
|
|
32,500
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Charles
Kahn, Jr.
|
|
|
57,700
|
(3)
|
|
*
|
|
|
Thomas
J. Lewis
|
|
|
35,500
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Joseph
J. McLaughlin
|
|
|
37,500
|
(4)
|
|
*
|
|
|
Michael
J. Morris
|
|
|
67,500
|
(5)
|
|
*
|
|
|
George
W. Nise
|
|
|
88,721
|
(6)
|
|
*
|
|
|
Donald
F. O’Neill
|
|
|
42,500
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Craig
W. Yates
|
|
|
2,009,190
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
Roy
D. Yates
|
|
|
659,484
|
(7)
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named
Executive Officers Who Are Not Also Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph
F. Conners
|
|
|
74,921
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Andrew
J. Miller
|
|
|
70,950
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Robert
J. Bush
|
|
|
99,877
|
(8)
|
|
*
|
|
|
Denise
Kassekert
|
|
|
64,721
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
Executive Officers, Directors and Director Nominees as a Group (17
persons)
|
|
|
3,609,060
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
(footnotes
on following page)
|
*
|
Represents
less than 1% of the Company’s outstanding shares.
|
|
(1)
|
This
column includes the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
of Unvested
Restricted
Stock Held
in
Trust Under the
Beneficial
Mutual
Bancorp,
Inc. 2008
Equity
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Shares
Held Under the
Beneficial
Mutual
Savings Bank
Stock
-
Based
Deferral Plan
|
|
|
Shares
Held or
Allocated
Under the
Beneficial
Mutual
Savings
Bank Employee
Savings
and Stock
Ownership
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Boehne
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr.
Cuddy
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
Mr.
Farnesi
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Ms.
Gemmill
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr.
Hayes
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr.
Kahn
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr.
Lewis
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr.
McLaughlin
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr.
Morris
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr.
Nise
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
11,221
|
|
|
Mr.
O’Neill
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr.
C. Yates
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr.
R. Yates
|
|
|
27,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr.
Conners
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
10,621
|
|
|
Mr.
Miller
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
Mr.
Bush
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
Ms.
Kassekert
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
(2)
|
Based
on 82,052,553 shares of Company common stock outstanding and entitled to
vote as of April 3, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
5,200 shares owned by Mr. Kahn’s spouse and 300 shares held by Mr. Kahn’s
spouse as custodian for their grandchild.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes
5,000 shares owned by Mr. McLaughlin’s spouse.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes
15,000 shares held by a trust in which Mr. Morris is a
beneficiary.
|
|
(6)
|
Includes
15,000 shares held by Mr. Nise’s spouse.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes
75,917 shares held by Mr. Yates’ children and one share held as executor
of the Charles B. Yates estate.
|
|
(8)
|
Includes
10,423 shares held by Mr. Bush’s
children.
|
ITEMS
TO BE VOTED ON BY STOCKHOLDERS
Item
1 — Election of Directors
The
Company’s Board of Directors currently consists of thirteen members. The Board
of Directors has adopted a resolution decreasing the size of the Board to twelve
members effective immediately prior to the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders.
The Board is divided into three classes with three-year staggered terms, with
approximately one-third of the directors elected each year. The Board of
Directors’ nominees for election this year, to serve for a three-year term or
until their respective successors have been elected and qualified, are Elizabeth
H. Gemmill, Thomas F. Hayes and Joseph J. McLaughlin. All of the nominees are
currently directors of the Company and the Bank. Craig W. Yates, a current
director of the Company, has not been renominated to serve on the Board of
Directors but will serve as Director Emeritus of the Company following the 2009
annual meeting of stockholders.
Unless
you indicate on the proxy card that your shares should not be voted for certain
nominees, the Board of Directors intends that the proxies solicited by it will
be voted for the election of each of the Board’s nominees. If any nominee is
unable to serve, the persons named in the proxy card would vote your shares to
approve the election of any substitute proposed by the Board of Directors. At
this time, we know of no reason why any nominee might be unable to
serve.
The
Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the election of all
of the nominees.
Information
regarding the nominees for election at the annual meeting is provided below.
Unless otherwise stated, each individual has held his or her current occupation
for the last five years. The age indicated for each individual is as of December
31, 2008. The indicated period of service as a director includes the period of
service as a director of Beneficial Bank.
Nominees
for Election as Directors
The
nominees for election to serve for a three-year term
are:
Elizabeth
H. Gemmill
serves
as the President of the Warwick Foundation, a private family foundation. Age 63.
Trustee of Beneficial Bank and director of Beneficial Savings Bank MHC and
Beneficial Mutual Bancorp since 2005. She is also a director of Universal
Display Corporation (Nasdaq: PANL) and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Philadelphia University.
Thomas
F. Hayes
is
the retired President of Philadelphia Gear Corporation, a power transmission
company. Age 86. Trustee of Beneficial Bank since 1974 and director of
Beneficial Savings Bank MHC and Beneficial Mutual Bancorp since their
formation.
Joseph
J. McLaughlin
is
the retired President of Beneficial Bank. Age 80. Trustee of Beneficial Bank
since 1974 and director of Beneficial Savings Bank MHC and Beneficial Mutual
Bancorp since their formation.
Directors
Continuing in Office
The
following directors have terms ending in 2010:
Edward
G. Boehne
is
a Senior Economic Advisor for Haverford Trust Company, an asset management
company. Age 68. Trustee of Beneficial Bank since 2000 and director of
Beneficial Savings Bank MHC and Beneficial Mutual Bancorp since their formation.
He is also a director of Toll Brothers, Inc. (NYSE: TOL) and the privately held
companies of Haverford Trust Company, Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company and AAA
Mid-Atlantic. Mr. Boehne also served as the President of the Federal Reserve
Bank of Philadelphia.
Charles
Kahn, Jr.
serves
as the Chairman of Kahn & Co., Inc., a real estate company. Age 84. Trustee
of Beneficial Bank since 1974 and director of Beneficial Savings Bank MHC and
Beneficial Mutual Bancorp since their formation.
Michael
J. Morris
is
the retired President and Chief Executive Officer of Transport International
Pool Inc., a transport trailer company. Age 74. Trustee of Beneficial Bank since
1989 and director of Beneficial Savings Bank MHC and Beneficial Mutual Bancorp
since their formation. He is also a director of Met-Pro Corporation (NYSE:
MPR).
Donald
F. O’Neill
is
the Chairman of PM Company, a paper converting company. Age 69. Trustee of
Beneficial Bank since 1988 and director of Beneficial Savings Bank MHC and
Beneficial Mutual Bancorp since their formation.
Roy
D. Yates
served
as the Chairman of the Board of FMS Financial Corporation. Mr. Yates is a
Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rutgers University in
Piscataway, New Jersey. Age 46. Roy D. Yates is the nephew of Craig W. Yates.
Trustee of Beneficial Bank and director of Beneficial Savings Bank MHC and
Beneficial Mutual Bancorp since 2007.
The
following directors have terms ending in 2011:
Gerard
P. Cuddy
is
our President and Chief Executive Officer, effective January 1, 2007, and also
serves as the Chairman of the Board. From May 2005 to November 2006, Mr. Cuddy
was a senior lender at Commerce Bank and from 2002 to 2005, Mr. Cuddy served as
a Senior Vice President of Fleet/Bank of America. Prior to Mr. Cuddy’s service
with Fleet/Bank of America, Mr. Cuddy held senior management positions with
First Union National Bank and Citigroup. Age 49. Trustee of Beneficial Bank and
director of Beneficial Savings Bank MHC and Beneficial Mutual Bancorp since
2006.
Frank
A. Farnesi
is
a retired partner of KPMG LLP. Age 61. Trustee of Beneficial Bank and director
of Beneficial Savings Bank MHC and Beneficial Mutual Bancorp since 2004. He is
also a director of RAIT Investment Trust (NYSE: RAS) and a Trustee of Immaculata
University.
Thomas
J. Lewis
is
the President and Chief Executive Officer of Thomas Jefferson University
Hospitals, Inc. Age 56. Trustee of Beneficial Bank and director of Beneficial
Savings Bank MHC and Beneficial Mutual Bancorp since
2005.
George
W. Nise
served
as our President and Chief Executive Officer until his retirement effective
January 1, 2007. Age 66. Trustee of Beneficial Bank since 2000 and director of
Beneficial Savings Bank MHC and Beneficial Mutual Bancorp since their
formation.
Item
2 — Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed Deloitte & Touche
LLP to be the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the
2009 fiscal year, subject to ratification by stockholders. A representative of
Deloitte & Touche LLP is expected to be present at the annual meeting to
respond to appropriate questions from stockholders and will have the opportunity
to make a statement should he or she desire to do so.
If
the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public
accounting firm is not approved by a majority of the shares represented at the
annual meeting and entitled to vote, other independent registered public
accounting firms may be considered by the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors.
The
Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the ratification of
the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm for the 2009 fiscal
year.
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Our
Compensation Philosophy
Our
compensation philosophy for our named executive officers is founded on the
premise that the success of Beneficial Mutual Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries
depends, in large part, on the dedication and commitment of the people we place
in key operating positions to drive our business strategy. We strive to satisfy
the demands of our business model by providing our management team with
incentives tied to the successful implementation of our corporate objectives.
However, we recognize that the Company operates in a competitive environment for
talent. Therefore, our approach to compensation considers the full range of
compensation techniques that enable us to compare favorably with our peers as we
seek to attract and retain key personnel.
We
ground our compensation philosophy on four basic principles:
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Meeting
the Demands of the Market
–
Our goal is to compensate our employees at competitive levels that
position us as the employer of choice among our peers who provide similar
financial services in the markets we
serve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Aligning
with Stockholders
– We use equity compensation as an additional
component of our compensation mix to develop a culture of ownership among
our named executive officers and to align their individual financial
interests with the interests of our
stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Performance
– We believe that a significant amount of executive compensation should be
performance-based. Therefore, our compensation program is designed to
reward superior performance and encourage our executive officers to feel
accountable for the Company’s financial performance and their individual
performance. In order to achieve this, we have structured our short-term
cash-based and equity programs to tie an executive’s compensation, in
part, directly to Company and individual
performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Reflecting
our Business Philosophy
– Our approach to compensation reflects our
values and the way we do business in the communities we
serve.
|
Elements
Used to Implement Our Compensation Objectives
The
compensation program for our named executive officers currently relies on three
(3) primary elements: (i) base compensation; (ii) short-term, cash-based
incentive compensation awards through our Management Incentive Plan; and (iii)
equity compensation, including performance-based awards, through our 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan. Both the short-term, cash-based incentive program and our equity
program place an emphasis on performance-based awards. We believe that we can
meet the objectives of our compensation philosophy by achieving a balance among
these three (3) elements that is competitive with our industry peers and creates
appropriate incentives for our named executive officers. To achieve the
necessary balance, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has
worked closely with the compensation consulting firm of Pearl Meyer &
Partners. See
“Role
of Compensation Consultant”
for a detailed description of the services
provided by Pearl Meyer & Partners.
Base
Compensation.
Each named executive officer has his base salary reviewed
on an annual basis in connection with the executive’s performance review.
Decisions regarding salary adjustments take into account an executive’s current
base salary and the amounts paid to the executive’s peers within and outside
Beneficial Mutual Bancorp, Inc. Our goal is to maintain salary levels for our
named executive officers at levels consistent with base pay received by those in
comparable positions at our peers. Therefore, in order to be competitive we
target base salaries to be at the median level of our peers. We obtain peer
group information from a variety of sources including survey data gathered by
Pearl Meyer & Partners. See
“Peer
Group Analysis”
for information of the financial institutions used to
benchmark base compensation levels. We also evaluate salary levels at the time
of promotion or other change in responsibilities or as a result of specific
commitments we made when a specific officer was hired. Individual performance
and retention risk are also considered as part of our annual assessment. See
“Executive
Compensation―Summary Compensation Table”
for salaries paid to our named
executive officers in 2008.
Short-Term
Cash-Based Incentive Compensation.
The Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”)
is designed to recognize and reward management for their collective and
individual contributions to our success. We believe that the use of cash for
annual incentive is consistent with competitive practice of companies within our
peer group. Our MIP focuses on performance measures that are critical to our
growth: (1) financial performance and (2) individual performance (
i.e.,
two to three individual goals that reflect required contributions to a
participant’s department). During 2008, our financial performance measures were
based on a quantitative assessment of performance (30% earnings per share and
20% efficiency ratio). The 2008 MIP awards varied based on performance and
ranged from 0% of target (not achieving threshhold performance) to 150% of
target (for exceptional performance). See
“Executive
Compensation― Summary Compensation Table”
for Management Incentive Plan
awards earned in 2008. See also “
Executive
Compensation―Grants of Plan-Based Awards”
for information on the
threshold, target and stretch levels for each of the participants in the 2008
MIP. For the 2009 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee approved new incentive
award levels and financial performance measures for the MIP
participants.
Long-Term
Equity-Based Compensation.
Our
equity incentive plan provides our Compensation Committee with a vehicle to
award long term incentives designed to provide compensation opportunities based
on the creation of shareholder value and an increase in our stock price. The
upside potential of our equity awards will not be realized by our name executive
officers unless our performance improves over the vesting period of the awards.
The type and number of equity awards granted are determined by the Compensation
Committee. Consistent with the Company’s pay for performance philosophy, the
equity awards granted to our named executive officers are in part
performance-based. See
“Executive
Compensation
―Grants
of Plan-Based Awards”
for detailed information on the equity awards
granted during the 2008 fiscal year.
Role
of the Compensation Committee
We
rely on the Compensation Committee to develop the broad outline of our
compensation program and to monitor the success of the program in achieving the
objectives of our compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee is also
responsible for the administration of our compensation programs and policies,
including the administration of our cash- and stock-based incentive
programs.
The
Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that establishes its
responsibilities. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors review
the charter periodically to ensure that the scope of the charter is consistent
with the Compensation Committee’s expected role. Under the charter, the
Compensation Committee is charged with general responsibility for the oversight
and administration of our compensation program. The charter vests in the
Compensation Committee principal responsibility for determining the compensation
of the Chief Executive Officer based on the Compensation Committee’s evaluation
of his performance. The charter also authorizes the Compensation Committee to
engage consultants and other professionals without management approval to the
extent deemed necessary to discharge its responsibilities.
During
2008, the Compensation Committee met six (6) times, including one (1) executive
session attended by Compensation Committee members only. The current members of
the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Frank A. Farnesi (Chairman), Charles
Kahn, Jr., Edward G. Boehne, Donald F. O’Neill, Thomas J. Lewis, Roy D. Yates
and Thomas F. Hayes.
Role
of the Compensation Consultant
The
Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners to provide
compensation data and recommendations that can be used to develop compensation
programs that support our strategies as a public company. Pearl Meyer &
Partners has provided consulting services in the areas of executive
compensation, director compensation and short-term and long-term incentive plan
design. Pearl Meyer & Partners also helped the Compensation Committee create
a peer group of institutions for purposes of benchmarking cash compensation for
the Company’s named executive officers and directors. See
“Peer
Group Analysi
s
.”
We
also utilized the consulting services of Towers Perrin during 2008 to assist us
in analyzing and restructuring the Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank retirement
benefit program. Towers Perrin provided us with analysis on the benefits
provided under our defined benefit plan, employee stock ownership plan and
401(k) plan. Recommendations were made by Towers Perrin and approved by the
Compensation Committee to freeze the Bank’s defined benefit pension plan, merge
the employee stock ownership plan and 401(k) plan and implement a non-qualified
retirement plan to supplement the benefits provided under the tax-qualified
retirement plans. See
“Retirement
Benefits/Employee Welfare Benefits”
for a discussion on the tax-qualified
and non-tax-qualified plans sponsored by Beneficial Mutual Savings
Bank.
Role
of Management
Our
Chief Executive Officer, in conjunction with representatives of the Compensation
Committee and the Human Resources Department, develops recommendations regarding
the appropriate mix and level of compensation for our named executive officers.
The recommendations consider the objectives of our compensation philosophy and
the range of compensation programs authorized by the Compensation Committee. The
Chief Executive Officer meets with the Compensation Committee to discuss the
compensation recommendations for the other named executive officers. Our Chief
Executive Officer does not participate in Compensation Committee discussions
relating to the determination of his compensation.
Peer
Group Analysis
We
firmly believe that the cornerstone of our compensation program is the
maintenance of a competitive compensation program relative to the companies with
whom we compete for talent. Pearl Meyer & Partners created our peer group
using data provided from SNL Financial. Our peer group consists of 20
publicly-traded financial institutions of comparable asset size, geographic
location, operating characteristics and financial performance. The Compensation
Committee utilized the peer group data on net income and efficiency ratios to
establish competitive cash incentives under the management incentive plan and to
recommend executive and director compensation. The following institutions make
up our peer group:
|
Company
Name
|
|
City
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National
Penn Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
Boyertown
|
|
PA
|
|
|
First
Niagara Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
Lockport
|
|
NY
|
|
|
NewAlliance
Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
New
Haven
|
|
CT
|
|
|
F.N.B.
Corporation
|
|
Hermitage
|
|
PA
|
|
|
Northwest
Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)
|
|
Warren
|
|
PA
|
|
|
Investors
Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)
|
|
Short
Hills
|
|
NJ
|
|
|
Provident
Financial Services, Inc.
|
|
Jersey
City
|
|
NJ
|
|
|
First
Commonwealth Financial Corporation
|
|
Indiana
|
|
PA
|
|
|
NBT
Bancorp Inc.
|
|
Norwich
|
|
NY
|
|
|
Community
Bank System, Inc.
|
|
De
Witt
|
|
NY
|
|
|
S&T
Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
Indiana
|
|
PA
|
|
|
Harleysville
National Corporation
|
|
Harleysville
|
|
PA
|
|
|
Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
Brooklyn
|
|
NY
|
|
|
Flushing
Financial Corporation
|
|
Lake
Success
|
|
NY
|
|
|
TrustCo
Bank Corp NY
|
|
Glenville
|
|
NY
|
|
|
Sun
Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
Vineland
|
|
NJ
|
|
|
WSFS
Financial Corporation
|
|
Wilmington
|
|
DE
|
|
|
Provident
New York Bancorp
|
|
Montebello
|
|
NY
|
|
|
Tompkins
Financial Corporation
|
|
Ithaca
|
|
NY
|
|
|
Lakeland
Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
Oak
Ridge
|
|
NJ
|
|
Allocation
Among Compensation Components
Under
our present structure, base salary has represented the largest component of
compensation for our named executive officers. However, our use of short-term
cash incentives and equity compensation reflects the growing importance of
performance-based compensation in our overall compensation structure. The
allocation of base salary and performance-based compensation (short-term cash
incentives and equity awards) varies depending upon the role of a named
executive officer in our organization.
Employment
and Management Agreements
We
maintain employment agreements with our named executive officers. In addition to
outlining the terms and conditions of employment, the employment agreements also
ensure the stability of our management team by providing the executives with
financial protection in the event a named executive officer is involuntarily
terminated by Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank or Beneficial Mutual Bancorp for
reasons other then cause (as defined in the employment agreements) or if a named
executive officer is terminated in connection with a change in control. See
“
Executive
Compensation
―
Employment/Management
Agreements
” and “
Potential
Post
-
Termination
Payments
” for a detailed discussion of the terms of the employment
agreements and the benefits provided upon termination of service.
Beneficial
Insurance Services, LLC (a subsidiary of Beneficial Bank) continues to maintain
a Senior Management Agreement with Robert J. Bush. The agreement was entered
into in 2005 in connection with the asset purchase agreement dated January 14,
2005 between Paul Hertel & Company and Beneficial Insurance Services, LLC.
Mr. Bush is an integral part of Paul Hertel & Company and Beneficial
Insurance Services wanted to secure his services under a management agreement
for the time period and under the terms described in the Senior Management
Agreement. See “
Executive
Compensation
―
Employment/Management
Agreements
” and “
―
Potential
Post
-
Termination
Payments
” for a detailed discussion of the terms of the management
agreement and the benefits provided upon termination of
service.
Tax
and Accounting Considerations
In
consultation with our advisors, we evaluate the tax and accounting treatment of
each of our compensation programs at the time of adoption and on an annual basis
to ensure an understanding of the financial impact of the program. Our analysis
includes a detailed review of recently adopted and pending changes in tax and
accounting requirement. As part of our review, we consider modifications and/or
alternatives to existing programs to take advantage of favorable changes in the
tax or accounting environment or to avoid adverse consequences. To preserve
maximum flexibility in the design and implementation of our compensation
program, we have not adopted a formal policy that requires all compensation to
be tax deductible. However, to the greatest extent possible, it is our intent to
structure our compensation programs in a tax efficient manner.
Retirement
Benefits; Employee Welfare Benefits
In
2008, we restructured our retirement program by freezing our defined benefit
pension plan. We also merged our employee stock ownership plan and 401(k) plan
into a single plan, the Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank Employee Savings and
Stock Ownership Plan (the “KSOP”), which will serve as our ongoing employee
retirement savings vehicle. To provide a transition to the new retirement plan
structure for certain long term service employees, we implemented a new
non-qualified retirement plan to supplement our frozen pension plan and the
KSOP. We believe our new retirement program provides our employees with
retirement benefits that are competitive with our peer group. Our KSOP enables
our employees to supplement their retirement savings with elective deferral
contributions that we match at specified levels. The KSOP also provides for
additional discretionary employer contributions. See “
Executive
Compensation
–
Pension
Benefits
” for a detailed description of our non-qualified plans and
arrangements.
In
addition to retirement programs, we provide our employees with coverage under
medical, life insurance and disability plans on terms consistent with industry
practice.
Perquisites
We
annually review the perquisites that we make available to our named executive
officers. The primary perquisites for senior managers include an automobile
allowance, computer and communications equipment and certain club dues. See
Footnote
4 to
“
Executive
Compensation
―
Summary
Compensation Table
” for detailed information on the perquisites provided
to our named executive officers.
Director
Compensation
Our
outside directors are compensated through a combination of retainers, meeting
fees and equity compensation. Directors who are also employees of Beneficial
Mutual Bancorp do not receive additional compensation for service on the Board.
The level and mix of director compensation is revised by the Compensation
Committee on a periodic basis to ensure consistency with the objectives of our
overall compensation philosophy.
Stock
Compensation Grant and Award Practices; Timing Issues
Our
Compensation Committee considers whether to make equity awards to officers and
directors on an annual basis and in connection with new hires and promotions.
The Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of our chief executive
officer and other executive officers with respect to awards contemplated for
their subordinates. The Compensation Committee also consults with Pearl Meyer
& Partners to insure our equity award program is competitive with our peer
group. The
Compensation
Committee is solely responsible for the development of the schedule of equity
awards made to our chief executive officer and the other named executive
officers.
As
a general matter, the Compensation Committee’s process is independent of any
consideration of the timing of the release of material non-public information,
including with respect to the determination of grant dates or stock option
exercise prices. Similarly, the Company has never timed the release of material
non-public information to affect the value of executive compensation. In
general, the release of such information reflects long-established timetables
for the disclosure of material non-public information such as earnings reports
or, with respect to other events reportable under federal securities laws, the
applicable requirements of such laws with respect to timing of disclosure. The
Compensation Committee’s decisions are reviewed and ratified by the full Board
of Directors.
The
terms and conditions of each equity award are determined in accordance with the
applicable provisions of our equity incentive plan. The Compensation Committee
has structured our current equity program to include the grant of non-statutory
stock options, performance shares and restricted shares. Options vest at a rate
of 20% per year commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date.
Restricted shares also vest over a 5 year period with 60% of the award vesting
on the third anniversary and 20% of the award vesting each year thereafter.
Performance shares vest upon the satisfaction of certain financial benchmarks.
In accordance with our equity plan, the Compensation Committee may grant stock
options only at or above fair market value, which is defined as the closing
sales price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the date
of grant.
Stock
Ownership Requirements
We
have not adopted formal stock ownership requirements for our named executive
officers or Board members. As a practical matter, our officers and directors
hold meaningful interests in our stock, which they have accumulated through
participation in stock compensation programs and individual
purchases.
Compensation
for the Named Executive Officers in 2008
Chief
Executive Officer Compensation.
In determining Mr. Cuddy’s compensation,
the Compensation Committee conducted a performance appraisal that reviewed Mr.
Cuddy’s financial, strategic and operational achievements. In its review, the
Compensation Committee noted that Mr. Cuddy exhibits strong leadership skills
and is moving the Company in a direction that has the potential to enhance
long-term stockholder value. Mr. Cuddy’s efforts have ensured that systems are
maintained to protect our assets and provide effective control of operations.
Mr. Cuddy has also served as our chief spokesperson, communicating effectively
with our stockholders, as well as the customers of Beneficial Mutual Savings
Bank. In light of the Compensation Committee’s assessment of Mr. Cuddy’s
performance, the Company’s financial performance and the Pearl Meyer &
Partners 2008 Executive Compensation Review, Mr. Cuddy did not receive an
increase in base salary for 2009. Mr. Cuddy did however satisfy certain of the
goals established for him under the 2008 Management Incentive Plan and received
a cash award of $95,000. See “
Executive
Compensation
―
Summary
Compensation Table
” for awards earned in 2008.
In
addition to cash compensation, Mr. Cuddy was awarded stock options, restricted
shares and performance grants on August 6, 2008 under the Company’s 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan. See “
Executive
Compensation
―
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards
” for information on the equity awards made to Mr.
Cuddy during the 2008 fiscal year. On March 9, 2009, the Compensation Committee
granted Mr. Cuddy an additional equity award consisting of non-statutory stock
options, restricted shares and performance shares. Mr. Cuddy’s March 9, 2009
option grant for 15,000 shares will vest at a rate of 20% per year over a five
year period. Mr. Cuddy’s March 9, 2009 restricted stock award for 7,500 shares
also vests over a 5 year period with 60% of the award vesting on the third
anniversary and 20% of the award vesting each year thereafter. Lastly, Mr.
Cuddy’s March 9, 2009 Performance Award for 7,500 shares will vest ratably upon
the Company’s attainment of a specific return on average assets (“ROAA”). In the
event the Company does not achieve the specified ROAA within five years of the
grant date of the Performance Shares, the performance requirement for vesting
purposes will be based on the Company’s overall ranking amongst its peers based
on ROAA. If the peer benchmark is not reached in year five, all Mr. Cuddy’s
Performance Shares will be forfeited.
In
addition to providing Mr. Cuddy with cash and equity compensation, the
Compensation Committee approved a two year employment agreement with Mr. Cuddy
effective January 7, 2008 which set forth the terms and conditions of Mr.
Cuddy’s employment with the Company and the Bank through 2010. In March 2009,
the agreement was amended and restated in its entirety to provide for an annual
renewal of the term of the agreement to insure that the agreement continues to
have a two-year term, unless notice of non-renewal is provided by the Company,
Bank or Mr. Cuddy. See “
Executive
Compensation
-
Employment
/
Management
Agreements
” for a detailed description of the agreement.
We
believe that Mr. Cuddy’s overall compensation structure is consistent with our
objective to reward, align, motivate and challenge Mr. Cuddy to continue to lead
our Company successfully.
Compensation
for Our Other Named Executive Officers.
In determining
compensation for Messrs. Conners, Bush and Miller and Ms. Kassekert the
Compensation Committee reviewed the performance appraisals presented by Mr.
Cuddy. Based on the Company’s financial performance and the survey data provided
by Pearl Meyer & Partners, only Ms. Kassekert received a salary increase for
2009. Effective January 1, 2009, Ms. Kassekert’s base salary was increased to
$225,000 and the salaries of the remaining other named executive officers remain
at 2008 levels. Messrs. Conners, Bush and Miller, and Ms. Kassekert did however
meet certain targets established for them under the 2008 Management Incentive
Plan and were each awarded incentive plan benefits. See “
Executive
Compensation
―
Grants
of Plan Based Awards
” for the cash incentives awarded to each officer for
the 2008 fiscal year.
In
January 2008, the Company and the Bank entered into a two-year employment
agreements with Messrs. Conners, Bush and Miller for the purpose of setting
forth the terms and conditions of their employment with the Bank and the Company
through 2010. In March 2009, the agreements were amended and restated to provide
for an annual renewal of the term of each agreement to insure that the
agreements continue to have a two-year term, unless notice of non-renewal is
provided by the Company, Bank or Executive. See “
Executive
Compensation - Employment
/
Management
Agreements
” for a detailed description of the agreement. Ms. Kassekert
entered into an employment agreement with the Bank and the Company in May 2008
and her agreement was also amended and restated in its entirety in March 2009 to
provide for an annual renewal of the term of the agreement.
In
addition to cash compensation, the other named executive officers were awarded
stock options, restricted shares and performance grants on August 6, 2008 under
the Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan. See “
Executive
Compensation
―
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards
” for information on the equity awards made during
the 2008 fiscal year. On March 9, 2009, the Compensation Committee granted the
other named executive officers an additional equity award consisting of
non-statutory stock options, restricted shares and performance shares. Each
officer received an option grant for 5,000 shares which vests at a rate of 20%
per year over a five year period; 4,000 restricted stock awards which also vest
over a 5 year period with 60% of the award vesting on the third anniversary and
20% of the award vesting each year thereafter and lastly, Performance Awards for
4,000 shares which vest ratably upon the Company’s attainment of a specific
return on average assets (“ROAA”). In the event the Company does not achieve the
specified ROAA within five years of the grant date of the performance shares,
the performance requirement for vesting purposes will be based on the Company’s
overall ranking amongst its peers based on ROAA. If the peer benchmark is not
reached in year five all performance shares will be forfeited.
In
addition to the equity awards granted under the Company’s 2008
Equity Incentive Plan, Messrs. Miller and Conners each received credits under
the newly implemented Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank Transition Credit
Retirement Plan for Designated Employees. See “
Executive
Compensation
–
Pension
Plan
” for information on the credits received by Messrs. Miller and
Conners under the Transition Credit Retirement Plan for Designated
Employees.
The
Compensation Committee believes that the compensation for our named executive
officers is consistent with our compensation objectives and rewards the
individuals for their contribution to the overall performance of Beneficial
Mutual Savings Bank and our Company.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table provides information concerning the total compensation awarded,
earned or paid to the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer of the Company and our three other
most
highly compensated executives. These five officers are referred to as the “named
executive officers” in this proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
(1)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
(2)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
|
|
|
Change
in
Pension
Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compen-
sation
Earnings
(3)
|
|
|
All
Other
Compen-
sation
(4)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerard
P. Cuddy
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
475,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
84,592
|
|
|
$
|
48,073
|
|
|
$
|
95,000
|
|
|
$
|
18,159
|
|
|
$
|
39,240
|
|
|
$
|
760,064
|
|
|
President
and Chief Executive
|
|
2007
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30,938
|
|
|
|
557,938
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
|
49,038
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
99,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph
F. Conners
|
|
2008
|
|
|
280,800
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
42,296
|
|
|
|
24,037
|
|
|
|
31,590
|
|
|
|
59,469
|
|
|
|
68,963
|
|
|
|
508,155
|
|
|
Executive
Vice President and
|
|
2007
|
|
|
269,519
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
40,500
|
|
|
|
98,150
|
|
|
|
14,464
|
|
|
|
422,633
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
|
245,000
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
128,648
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
425,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew
J. Miller
|
|
2008
|
|
|
280,800
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
42,296
|
|
|
|
24,037
|
|
|
|
45,630
|
|
|
|
72,536
|
|
|
|
69,035
|
|
|
|
534,334
|
|
|
Executive
Vice President and
|
|
2007
|
|
|
269,519
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
40,500
|
|
|
|
96,522
|
|
|
|
14,626
|
|
|
|
421,167
|
|
|
Chief
Lending Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
|
245,000
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
122,387
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
384,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
J. Bush
|
|
2008
|
|
|
312,000
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
42,296
|
|
|
|
24,037
|
|
|
|
27,300
|
|
|
|
16,810
|
|
|
|
32,320
|
|
|
|
455,763
|
|
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
2007
|
|
|
280,957
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
11,276
|
|
|
|
25,597
|
|
|
|
362,830
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
219,317
|
|
|
|
|
19,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
14,043
|
|
|
|
252,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denise
Kassekert
|
|
2008
|
|
|
192,000
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
42,296
|
|
|
|
24,037
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,526
|
|
|
|
312,859
|
|
|
Executive
Vice President
|
|
2007
|
|
|
110,423
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
110,423
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1)
|
Reflects
the compensation expense recognized for financial statement reporting
purposes in accordance with SFAS 123(R) on outstanding restricted stock
awards for each of the named executive officers. The amounts were
calculated based on the Company’s stock price of $11.86 as of the date of
grant. When shares become vested and are distributed from the trust in
which they are held, the recipient will also receive an amount equal to
accumulated cash and stock dividends (if any) paid with respect thereto,
plus earnings thereon.
|
|
(2)
|
Reflects
the compensation expense recognized for financial statement reporting
purposes in accordance with SFAS 123(R) for outstanding stock option
awards for each of the named executive officers based upon a fair value of
$3.37 for each option using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate its
compensation cost for stock options awards. For further information on the
assumptions used to compute fair value, see Note 18 to the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The actual value, if
any, realized by a named executive officer from any option will depend on
the extent to which the market value of the common stock exceeds the
exercise price of the option on the date the option is exercised.
Accordingly, there is no assurance that the value realized by a named
executive officer will be at or near the value estimated
above.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents
the actuarial change in pension value in the executives’ amounts during
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 under the Beneficial
Mutual Savings Bank Employees’ Pension and Retirement Plan, the Beneficial
Mutual Savings Bank Supplemental Pension and Retirement Plan and the life
insurance portion of each executive’s salary continuation agreement. See
“Pension
Benefits”
below for a further discussion of these
arrangements.
|
|
(4)
|
Details
of the amounts reported in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2008
are provided in the table
below.
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Cuddy
|
|
|
Mr.
Conners
|
|
|
Mr.
Miller
|
|
|
Mr.
Bush
|
|
|
Ms.
Kassekert
|
|
|
|
Employer
contributions to KSOP
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
|
$
|
39,100
|
|
|
$
|
39,100
|
|
|
$
|
18,400
|
|
|
$
|
9,526
|
|
|
|
Income
recognized under split-dollar life insurance arrangements
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Transition
Credit Retirement Plan contribution
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29,007
|
|
|
|
28,917
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Perquisites
|
|
|
20,840
|
(a)
|
|
|
—
|
(b)
|
|
|
—
|
(b)
|
|
|
13,920
|
(c)
|
|
|
—
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes
personal use of Company-owned automobile and club memberships and
initiation fees.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Did
not exceed $10,000.
|
|
|
(c)
|
Represents
annual car
allowance.
|
|
(5)
|
While
Mr. Cuddy’s base salary in 2006 was $425,000, the amount shown represents
his partial year compensation from his start date on November 13,
2006.
|
|
(6)
|
While
Ms. Kassekert’s base salary in 2007 was $174,000, the amount shown
represents her partial year compensation from her start date on May 7,
2007. Due to Ms. Kassekert’s May 7, 2007 start date, compensation data is
not available for
2006.
|
Employment/Management
Agreements
The
Company and the Bank maintain employment and/or management agreements with
Gerard P. Cuddy, Joseph F. Conners, Andrew J. Miller, Robert J. Bush and Denise
Kassekert. The employment agreements with Messrs. Cuddy, Conners, Miller and
Bush were entered into effective January 7, 2008 and had an initial term of two
years. The employment agreement with Ms. Kassekert was entered into effective as
of May 15, 2008 and has an initial term that expires on January 7, 2010. In
March 2009, each agreement was amended and restated in its entirety to provide
for an annual renewal of the term of the agreement following the executive’s
performance review. The employment agreements provide for, among other things, a
minimum annual base salary, eligibility to participate in employee benefit plans
and programs maintained by the Company and the Bank for the benefit of their
employees, including discretionary bonuses, incentive compensation programs,
participation in medical, dental, pension, profit sharing, retirement and
stock-based compensation plans and certain fringe benefits applicable to
executive personnel. Under the terms of Mr. Cuddy’s employment agreement, his
annual incentive compensation opportunity for 2009 will not be less than
$125,000. In the event that any of the executives is terminated by the Company
or the Bank for reasons other than a change in control, the executive will be
prohibited from competing with the Company or the Bank for the period of time
specified in his or her agreement.
The
Bank, Beneficial Insurance Services, LLC and Robert J. Bush entered into a
Senior Management Agreement on January 14, 2005 in connection with Beneficial
Insurance Services, LLC’s acquisition of Paul Hertel & Co. The agreement
provides that Mr. Bush is an at will employee of Beneficial Insurance Services,
LLC and subject to non-compete and non-solicitation restrictions similar to
those provided for in Mr. Bush’s employment agreement with the Company and the
Bank. The non-competition restrictions will expire two years following Mr.
Bush’s termination of employment and the non-solicitation restrictions will
expire five years following his termination of employment.
See
“Potential
Post-Termination Payments”
for a discussion of the benefits and payments
each executive may receive under the employment or management agreement upon
termination of employment.
Grants
of Plan Based Awards
2008
Equity Incentive Plan
.
The following table provides information concerning all stock option
awards granted to the named executive officers in 2008 under the Beneficial
Mutual Bancorp, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
Number
of Shares
of
Stock or
Units
(1)
|
|
|
Number
of Securities
Underlying
Options
(2)
|
|
|
Exercise
or
Base
Price of
Option
Awards
|
|
|
Grant
Date Fair
Value
of Stock
Awards
and
Options
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerard
P. Cuddy
|
|
08/06/2008
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.86
|
|
|
$
|
1,860,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph
F. Conners
|
|
08/06/2008
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
11.86
|
|
|
|
930,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew
J. Miller
|
|
08/06/2008
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
11.86
|
|
|
|
930,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
J. Bush
|
|
08/06/2008
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
11.86
|
|
|
|
930,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denise
Kassekert
|
|
08/06/2008
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
11.86
|
|
|
|
845,750
|
|
|
(1)
|
For
Mr. Cuddy, restricted shares vest according to the following schedule: (1)
50,000 shares are subject to a three-year cliff vesting schedule whereby
no shares vest on the first and second anniversaries of the award, 60% of
the shares vest on the third anniversary of the award and 20% of the
shares vest on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the award;
and (2) 50,000 shares will vest if certain specified performance
requirements are met during the performance measurement period beginning
on December 31, 2009 and ending on December 31, 2013. For all other named
executive officers, restricted shares vest according to the following
schedule: (1) 25,000 shares are subject to a three-year cliff vesting
schedule whereby no shares vest on the first and second anniversaries of
the award, 60% of the shares vest on the third anniversary of the award
and 20% of the shares vest on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries
of the award; and (2) 25,000 shares will vest if certain specified
performance requirements are met during the performance measurement period
beginning on December 31, 2009 and ending on December 31,
2013.
|
|
(2)
|
Options
vest in five equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary
of the date of grant.
|
|
(3)
|
Sets
forth the grant date fair value of stock and option awards calculated in
accordance with FAS 123(R). The grant date fair value of all stock awards
is equal to the number of awards multiplied by $11.86, the closing price
for the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The grant date fair
value for option awards is equal to the number of options multiplied by a
fair value of $3.37, which was computed using the Black-Scholes opton
pricing model. For further information on the assumptions used to compute
fair value, see Note 18 to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31,
2008.
|
The
Company maintains the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan to further its commitment to
performance-based compensation and to provide employees and directors with an
opportunity to have an equity interest in the Company. The plan is administered
by the Company’s Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the
authority to grant stock options, restricted stock awards and performance shares
to officers and directors of the Company and the Bank. Additional information on
the Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan is set forth in the
“Compensation
Discussion and Analysis”
section of this proxy
statement.
Management
Incentive Plan
.
The following table sets forth the threshold, target and maximum award
that may be earned by each named executive officer under our 2008 Management
Incentive Plan, if 100% of the Company’s financial objectives and 100% of an
individual’s performance goals are achieved at the applicable payout
level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Possible Payouts
Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
(1)
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
of
Corporate
Approval
|
|
|
Threshold
($)
|
|
|
Target
($)
|
|
|
Maximum
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerard
P. Cuddy
|
|
03/17/2008
|
|
|
$
|
95,000
|
|
|
$
|
190,000
|
|
|
$
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph
F. Conners
|
|
03/17/2008
|
|
|
|
35,100
|
|
|
|
70,200
|
|
|
|
105,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew
J. Miller
|
|
03/17/2008
|
|
|
|
35,100
|
|
|
|
70,200
|
|
|
|
105,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
J. Bush
|
|
03/17/2008
|
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
117,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denise
Kassekert
|
|
03/17/2008
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
(1)
|
The
“Summary
Compensation Table”
shows the actual awards earned by our named
executive officers under the 2008 Management Incentive
Plan.
|
The
Bank maintains a management incentive plan to recognize and reward executives
for their individual and collective contributions to the success of the Bank.
The management incentive plan focuses on performance measures that are critical
to the profitability and growth of the Bank. Only senior management who are in a
position to successfully execute the Bank’s strategic plan may participate in
the management incentive plan. Each participant’s incentive award opportunity is
based on competitive market practice for his or her position. The performance
measurement period for the 2008 incentive awards was January 1st through
December 31st. For 2008, management incentive plan awards were determined based
on a combination of our financial performance and a participant’s individual
performance. If a participant satisfies 100% of his or her individual
performance objectives at the threshold, target or maximum payout level and we
achieve a lesser percentage of our financial objectives, the participant is
entitled to a pro-rated management incentive plan award under the applicable
payout level.
For
additional information regarding management incentive plan awards, please
reference the short-term, cash-based incentive compensation section of our
“Compensation
Discussion and Analysis”
and our “
Summary
Compensation Table”
contained in this proxy statement.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The
following table provides information concerning unexercised options and stock
awards that have not vested for each named executive officer outstanding as of
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(1)
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of
Stock That
Have
Not Vested
(2)
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares
or Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
(3)
|
|
|
Gerard
P. Cuddy
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.86
|
|
08/06/2018
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,125,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph
F. Conners
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
11.86
|
|
08/06/2018
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew
J. Miller
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
11.86
|
|
08/06/2018
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
J. Bush
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
11.86
|
|
08/06/2018
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denise
Kassekert
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
11.86
|
|
08/06/2018
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
(1)
|
Options
vest in five equal annual installments beginning one year from the date of
grant, which for all awards and options was August 6,
2008.
|
|
(2)
|
For
Mr. Cuddy, restricted shares vest according to the following schedule: (1)
50,000 shares are subject to a three-year cliff vesting schedule whereby
no shares vest on the first and second anniversaries of the award, 60% of
the shares vest on the third anniversary of the award and 20% of the
shares vest on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the award;
and (2) 50,000 shares will vest if certain specified performance
requirements are met during the performance measurement period beginning
on December 31, 2009 and ending on December 31, 2013. For all other named
executive officers, restricted shares vest according to the following
schedule: (1) 25,000 shares are subject to a three-year cliff vesting
schedule whereby no shares vest on the first and second anniversaries of
the award, 60% of the shares vest on the third anniversary of the award
and 20% of the shares vest on each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries
of the award; and (2) 25,000 shares will vest if certain specified
performance requirements are met during the performance measurement period
beginning on December 31, 2009 and ending on December 31,
2013.
|
|
(3)
|
Based
upon the Company’s closing stock price of $11.25 on December 31,
2008.
|
Pension
Benefits
The
following table sets forth the actuarial present value of each named executive
officer’s accumulated benefit under our tax-qualified and non tax-qualified
defined benefit plans, along with the number of years of credited service under
the respective plans. No distributions were made under the plans in 2008. The
Bank froze the Employees’ Pension and Retirement Plan of Beneficial Mutual
Savings Bank effective June 30, 2008. Ms. Kassekert is not a participant in the
Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank tax-qualified and non-qualified defined benefit
plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Plan
Name
|
|
Number
of
Years
of
Credited
Service
(1)
|
|
Present
Value
of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)
(2)
|
|
|
Gerard
P. Cuddy
|
Employees’
Pension and Retirement Plan of Beneficial Mutual Savings
Bank
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
$
|
6,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Pension and Retirement Plan of Beneficial Mutual Savings
Bank
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph
F. Conners
|
Employees’
Pension and Retirement Plan of Beneficial Mutual Savings
Bank
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
441,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Pension and Retirement Plan of Beneficial Mutual Savings
Bank
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
88,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
Continuation Agreement
|
|
|
25
|
(3)
|
|
11,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew
J. Miller
|
Employees’
Pension and Retirement Plan of Beneficial Mutual Savings
Bank
|
|
|
34.5
|
|
|
523,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Pension and Retirement Plan of Beneficial Mutual Savings
Bank
|
|
|
34.5
|
|
|
89,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
Continuation Agreement
|
|
|
25
|
(3)
|
|
17,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
J. Bush
|
Employees’
Pension and Retirement Plan of Beneficial Mutual Savings
Bank
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
18,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Pension and Retirement Plan of Beneficial Mutual Savings
Bank
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
10,049
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents
the number of years of credited service used only to determine the benefit
under the pension plan. Years of credited service were frozen at June 30,
2008.
|
|
(2)
|
The
present value of each executive’s accumulated benefit assumes normal
retirement (age 65), the election of a single life form of pension and is
based on a 6.5% discount rate for the Employees’ Pension and Retirement
Plan and 6.90% for the Supplemental Pension and Retirement
Plan.
|
|
(3)
|
The
maximum years of service credit for the salary continuation agreements is
25.
|
Employees’
Pension and Retirement Plan.
The Employees’ Pension and Retirement Plan
of Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank was frozen effective June 30, 2008. The frozen
plan provides that an active participant may retire on or after the date the
participant attains age 65 and upon retirement, after twenty-five accrual years
of service as a participant, receive a monthly pension in the form of a straight
life annuity equal to 50% of his or her average monthly compensation. If the
participant’s service is less than 25 years, his or her pension will be adjusted
by the ratio of service to 25 years. After attainment of age 55 and the
completion of five years of service, an active participant may elect early
retirement. Upon early retirement a participant will be entitled to receive his
or her accrued pension commencing on his or her normal retirement date or, if
the participant desires, he or she may elect to receive a reduced pension which
can commence on the first day of the month concurrent with or next following the
participant’s early retirement date. If the employment of an active participant
is terminated because of total and permanent disability, the participant will be
entitled to receive a disability pension equal to the participant’s accrued
pension, without actuarial reduction, commencing on the date the participant
terminates employment due to disability and continuing until his death or until
recovery from his total and permanent disability, if prior to age
65.
Participants
generally have no vested interest in retirement plan benefits prior to the
completion of five years of service. Following the completion of five years of
vesting service, or in the event of a participant’s attainment of age 65 (or the
fifth anniversary of participation in the plan, if later), death or termination
of employment due to disability, a participant will become 100% vested in his or
her accrued benefit under the retirement plan. The retirement plan provides that
a participant may receive, subject to certain spousal consent requirements, his
or her pension benefit in any of the following forms: (i) a life annuity, (ii) a
reduced life annuity for the participant’s life with 120 monthly payments
guaranteed if the participant dies prior to receiving the 120 payments, (iii) a
100%, 75% or 50% joint and survivor annuity, or (iv) a lump sum distribution if
the value of the accrued pension benefit is less than $5,000.
Supplemental
Pension and Retirement Plan.
The Supplemental
Pension and Retirement Plan of Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank provides benefits
which would have been payable to certain officers under the Bank’s Employees’
Pension and Retirement Plan but for certain IRS limitations. Upon termination of
employment with the Bank a participants are eligible to receive benefits under
the Supplemental Pension and Retirement Plan equal to the excess, if any, of (i)
the benefits which would have been payable to the participant commencing on the
first day of the month coincident with or next following the attainment of age
65 under the Pension Plan in the form of a single life annuity, but for the
limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code, based on a participant’s
compensation and service with Beneficial Bank through June 30, 2008, over (ii)
the accrued benefits actually payable under the Pension Plan commencing on the
first day of the month coincident with or next following the attainment of age
65 in the form of a single life annuity. In the event of the death of a
participant prior to the commencement of benefits under the Pension Plan and in
the event the participant’s spouse or beneficiary is entitled to a survivor’s
benefit under the Pension, the spouse or beneficiary shall receive a benefit
under the Supplemental Pension and Retirement Plan.
Salary
Continuation Arrangements.
Beneficial Mutual
Savings Bank maintains salary continuation agreements with Messrs. Conners and
Miller to provide the executives with additional compensation at retirement at
or after attaining age 65, or upon termination of employment by reason of death.
In the event Messrs. Conners or Miller terminate employment prior to age 65, for
reasons other than death or dishonesty, the executives will be entitled to a
life insurance policy with a death benefit equal to $490,000. Alternatively, the
executives may elect to receive a cash payment equal to the cash surrender value
of the executive’s life insurance policy. The Bank has purchased several
insurance policies to fund the benefits provided under the salary continuation
arrangements. See
“Potential
Post-Termination Payments”
for a discussion of the benefits and payments
each executive may receive under the salary continuation agreements upon his
termination of employment.
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation
The
following table discloses contributions made under any of the non-qualified
defined contribution plans sponsored by Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank for each
named executive officer who participated in the plan in 2008, along with the
earnings and balances on each executive’s account as of December 31, 2008. No
distributions or withdrawals were made from any of the plans in 2008. Messrs.
Cuddy and Bush and Ms. Kassekert do not participate in any of the non-qualified
deferred compensation plans sponsored by the Bank.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Plan
Name
|
|
Registrant
Contributions
in
Last
Fiscal Year
($)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Earnings
in
2008
|
|
|
Aggregate
Balance
at
Last Fiscal Year
End
($)
|
|
|
Joseph
F. Conners
|
Elective
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
$
|
14,090
|
|
|
$
|
(7,249
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based
Deferral Plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,062
|
|
|
|
22,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition
Credit Retirement Plan for Designated Employees
|
|
|
29,007
|
(1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew
J. Miller
|
Elective
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based
Deferral Plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition
Credit Retirement Plan for Designated Employees
|
|
|
28,917
|
(1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28,917
|
|
|
(1)
|
These
amounts represent the Company’s contributions during the 2008 fiscal year
and have been reported in the “All Other Compensation” column of the
“Summary Compensation Table”
for
2008.
|
Elective Deferred
Compensation Plan.
The Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank Elective Deferred
Compensation Plan assists certain employees designated by the Board as
participants in maximizing their ability to save on a tax-deferred basis. The
plan is intended to constitute an unfunded plan primarily for the purpose of
providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly
compensated employees. Participants must submit a deferral election agreement
and distribution form to the Bank’s Human Resources Department outlining the
amount of their deferrals and form of distribution prior to the year in which
the compensation will be earned. See
“Potential Post-Termination
Payments”
below for a discussion of the benefits and payments each
executive may receive under the Elective Deferred Compensation Plan upon his
termination of employment.
Stock-Based
Deferral Plan.
Beneficial Mutual
Savings Bank maintains a Stock-Based Deferral Plan for certain eligible officers
and directors. The plan allows participants to defer compensation and invest
their deferrals in Beneficial Mutual Bancorp common stock. See
“Potential Post-Termination
Payments”
below for a discussion of the benefits and payments each
executive may receive under the Stock-Based Deferral Plan upon his termination
of employment.
Transition Credit
Retirement Plan for Designated Employees.
Beneficial Mutual
Savings Bank implemented the Transition Credit Retirement Plan in 2008 to
provide certain key employees of the Bank with a non-qualified retirement
benefit to supplement benefits available to them under the Bank’s frozen pension
plan and the Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank Employee Savings and Stock Ownership
Plan. For each plan year beginning with the plan year ended December 31, 2008
and ending with the plan year ending December 31, 2017, the transition credit
account of a participant who is (i) employed on the last day of the plan year or
(ii) terminates employment by reason of his or her death or disability during
the
plan year, shall be credited with a transition credit in a dollar amount equal
to the percentage of the participant’s compensation (as defined in the KSOP)
designated in the plan. Participants are always 100% vested in their transition
credit accounts. Plan benefits are payable in a lump sum no later than 90 days
following the date the participant separates service with the Bank.
Potential
Post-Termination Payments
Payments Made
Upon Termination for Cause.
Under the terms of the
employment agreements with Messrs. Cuddy, Conners, Miller, Bush and Ms.
Kassekert, if any of the executives is terminated for cause, he or she will
receive his or her base salary through the date of termination and retain the
rights to any vested benefits subject to the terms of the plan or arrangement
under which those benefits are provided. All unvested stock awards, performance
awards and stock options will be forfeited in the event an executive is
terminated for cause and all rights to vested stock options that have not been
exercised will also be forfeited.
In
the event Messrs. Conners and Miller terminate employment for dishonesty, the
executives will forfeit all rights to benefits provided under their salary
continuation agreements.
Payments Made
Upon Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason.
If the Bank or the
Company terminates an executive’s employment for reasons other than for cause or
a change in control, or if an executive resigns from the Bank or the Company
after specified circumstances set forth in the agreements that would constitute
constructive termination, the employment agreements provide that the executive
or, if the executive dies, his or her beneficiary, would be entitled to receive
two (2) times the sum of the executive’s (i) current base salary and (ii) the
most recent bonus paid. The severance benefit would be paid ratably over a
two-year period. In addition, the executive would be entitled to receive, for
the 24-month period following his or her termination date, medical, dental and
life insurance coverage. If the Bank or the Company terminates its employment
relationship with Messrs. Cuddy, Conners, Miller or Ms. Kassekert during the
term of their employment agreements for reasons other than cause or a change in
control, the executive must adhere to a one-year non-competition restriction. If
the Company, the Bank or an affiliate of the Company or the Bank terminates Mr.
Bush for any reason during the term of his employment agreement, Mr. Bush will
be subject to a two-year non-competition restriction and a five-year
non-solicitation restriction. Mr. Bush’s Senior Management Agreement provides
for similar non-compete and non-solicitation restrictions.
In
the event the executives terminate employment without cause or for good reason
they will forfeit all unvested stock awards, performance awards and stock
options. If Mr. Conners and Mr. Miller terminate employment without cause or for
good reason they will receive their entire account balance in a lump sum under
the Bank’s Transition Credit Retirement Plan.
The
salary continuation agreements provide that if Mr. Conners or Mr. Miller
terminates employment with the Bank prior to age 65 for reasons other than death
or dishonesty, each executive would be entitled to a life insurance policy with
a death benefit equal to $490,000. Alternatively, the executives may elect to
receive a cash payment, equal to the cash surrender value of the executive’s
life insurance policy.
Payments Made
Upon Disability.
The employment
agreements provide each executive with a disability benefit equal to two-thirds
of the executive’s bi-weekly rate of base salary as of his or her termination
date. An executive will cease to receive disability payments upon the earlier
of: (1) the date the executive returns to full-time employment; (2) the death of
the executive; (3) the executive’s attainment of age 65; or (4) the date the
employment agreement would have expired had the executive’s employment not
terminated by reason of the executive’s disability. In addition, the executive
would
continue
to be covered, to the greatest extent possible, under all benefit plans in which
the executive participated before his or her disability as if he or she were
actively employed by us. Disability payments are reduced by any disability
benefits paid to an executive under any policy or program maintained by the
Bank.
In
the event the executives terminate employment due to disability, they will vest
100% in all unvested stock awards and stock options. Following termination of
employment due to a disability, Mr. Conners and Mr. Miller will receive their
entire account balance in a lump sum payment from the Bank’s Transition Credit
Retirement Plan.
The
salary continuation agreements provide that if Mr. Conners or Mr. Miller
terminates employment with the Bank prior to age 65 for reasons other than death
or dishonesty, each executive would be entitled to a life insurance policy with
a death benefit equal to $490,000. Alternatively, the executives may elect to
receive a cash payment, equal to the cash surrender value of the executive’s
life insurance policy.
Payments Made
Upon Death.
Under the employment
agreements, the executive’s estate is entitled to receive any salary and bonus
accrued but unpaid as of the date of the executive’s death.
The
salary continuation agreements maintained for Messrs. Conners and Miller provide
that in the event the executive dies before age 55, while in active service, the
Bank will pay the executive’s beneficiary $20,416.67 per month for twelve months
commencing on the first month following the executive’s death and $13,617.92 per
month commencing on the thirteenth month following the executive’s death through
the month the executive would have attained age 65. If Messrs. Conners and
Miller are in active service with the Bank and die after attaining age 65 but
prior to attaining age 55, the Bank will pay the executive’s beneficiary
$20,416.67 per month for twelve months and $13,617.92 per month commencing on
the thirteenth month following the executive’s death through the one hundred and
twentieth month following the executive’s death.
Payments Made
Upon a Change in Control.
Following a change in
control of the Bank or the Company, under the terms of the employment
agreements, if an executive voluntarily terminates (upon circumstances discussed
in the agreement) or involuntarily terminates employment, the executive or, if
the executive dies, the executive’s beneficiary, would be entitled to receive a
severance payment equal to three (3) times the sum of the executive’s (i) base
salary and (ii) most recent bonus paid by the Company and/or the Bank. In
addition, the executive would also be entitled to continued medical, dental and
life insurance coverage for the executive and his dependents for 36 months
following his termination of employment. Mr. Cuddy would also be entitled to
continue his club memberships for 36 months following his termination of
employment at no cost to him.
Section
280G of the Internal Revenue Code provides that severance payments that equal or
exceed three times an individual’s base amount are deemed to be “excess
parachute payments” if they are contingent upon a change in control (the
“Section 280G Limitation”). An individual’s base amount is equal to an average
of the individual’s Form W-2 compensation for the five years preceding the
year a change in control occurs (or such lesser number of years if the
individual has not been employed for five years). Individuals receiving excess
parachute payments are subject to a 20% excise tax on the amount of the payment
in excess of the base amount, and the employer may not deduct such amount for
federal tax purposes. The employment agreements limit payments made to the
executives in connection with a change in control to amounts that will not
exceed the limits imposed by Section 280G.
Under
the terms of the Bank’s KSOP, upon a change in control (as defined in the plan)
the plan trustee will repay in full any outstanding acquisition loan and all
remaining shares held in the loan suspense account after repayment will be
allocated to participants as set forth in the plan.
In
the event the executives terminate employment in connection with a change in
control, they will vest 100% in all unvested stock awards and stock options.
Following termination of employment due to a change in control, Mr. Conners and
Mr. Miller will receive their entire account balance in a lump sum payment from
the Bank’s Transition Retirement Plan.
All
payments under the Elective Deferred Compensation Plan and the Stock-Based
Deferral Plan will be made in accordance with the form and timing elections made
at the time of each executive’s deferral election.
Potential
Post-Termination Benefits Tables.
The amount of compensation payable to
each named executive officer upon termination for cause, termination upon an
event of termination, change in control followed by termination of employment,
disability, death and retirement is shown below. The amounts shown assume that
such termination was effective as of December 31, 2008, and thus include amounts
earned through such time and are estimates of the amounts that would be paid out
to the executives upon their termination. The amounts do not include the
executive’s account balances in the Bank’s tax-qualified retirement plans to
which each executive has a non-forfeitable interest. The amounts shown relating
to unvested options and awards are based on the fair market value of the
Company’s common stock on December 31, 2008, which was $11.25. The actual
amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such executive’s
separation from the Company.
The
following table provides the amount of compensation payable to Mr. Cuddy for
each of the situations listed below as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
Due Upon
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
for
Cause
|
|
|
Termination
without
Cause
or for
Good
Reason
|
|
|
Change
in Control
with
Termination
of
Employment
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Base
salary
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
950,000
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
1,275,000
|
|
|
$
|
627,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Bonuses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
204,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
306,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
95,000
|
(4)
|
|
Medical,
life and dental insurance benefits
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,916
|
|
|
|
40,374
|
|
|
|
26,916
|
(3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Fringe
benefits
(1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
41,979
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Income
attributable to vesting of stock awards
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,125,000
|
|
|
|
1,125,000
|
|
|
|
1,125,000
|
|
|
Total
severance payment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,180,916
|
|
|
$
|
2,788,353
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
1,778,916
|
|
|
$
|
1,220,000
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents
the value of personal use of Company-owned automobile and club memberships
and initiation fees.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents
the total value of payments that would be paid ratably over a two-year
period.
|
|
(3)
|
Benefits
have been calculated based on the date the agreement would have expired
had the executive’s employment not terminated due to his
disability.
|
|
(4)
|
Represents
the amount earned under the 2008 Management Incentive Plan and payable to
the executive’s beneficiary.
|
|
(5)
|
The
amount shown does not reflect adjustments that would be made to the
executive’s total change in control severance payment to insure the
executive’s severance payment would not be deemed an “excess parachute
payment” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
Code.
|
The
following table provides the amount of compensation payable to Mr. Conners for
each of the situations listed below as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
Due Upon
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
for
Cause
|
|
|
Termination
without
Cause
or for
Good
Reason
|
|
|
Change
in Control
with
Termination
of
Employment
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Base
salary
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
561,600
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
842,400
|
|
|
$
|
370,656
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Bonuses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
81,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
121,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
31,590
|
|
|
Medical,
life and dental insurance benefits
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29,150
|
|
|
|
43,725
|
|
|
|
29,150
|
(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Transition
Credit Retirement Plan
(5)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29,007
|
|
|
|
29,007
|
|
|
|
29,007
|
|
|
|
29,007
|
(3)
|
|
Salary
Continuation Agreement
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28,601
|
(6)
|
|
|
28,601
|
(6)
|
|
|
28,601
|
(6)
|
|
|
1,532,634
|
(7)
|
|
Income
attributable to vesting of stock awards
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
Total
severance payment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
729,358
|
|
|
$
|
1,627,733
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
1,019,914
|
|
|
$
|
2,155,731
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents
the total value of payments that would be paid ratably over a two-year
period.
|
|
(2)
|
Benefits
have been calculated based on the date the agreement would have expired
had the executive’s employment not terminated due to his
disability.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents
the amount earned under the 2008 Management Incentive Plan and payable to
the executive’s beneficiary.
|
|
(4)
|
The
amount shown does not reflect adjustments that would be made to the
executive’s total change in control severance payment to insure the
executive’s severance payment would not be deemed an “excess parachute
payment” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
Code.
|
|
(5)
|
Represents
the accrued balance that would be paid to the executive under the
Transition Credit Retirement Plan for Designated
Employees.
|
|
(6)
|
Represents
the cash surrender value of the executive’s life insurance policy under
the agreement.
|
|
(7)
|
Represents
the present value of the monthly payments to be made to Mr. Conners’
beneficiary for 166 months. The present value was calculated using a 6.9%
discount
rate.
|
The
following table provides the amount of compensation payable to Mr. Miller for
each of the situations listed below as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
Due Upon
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
for
Cause
|
|
|
Termination
without
Cause
or for
Good
Reason
|
|
|
Change
in Control
with
Termination
of
Employment
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Base
salary
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
561,600
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
842,400
|
|
|
$
|
370,656
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Bonuses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
81,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
121,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
45,630
|
(3)
|
|
Medical,
life and dental insurance benefits
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
45,618
|
|
|
|
68,427
|
|
|
|
45,618
|
(2)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Transition
Credit Retirement Plan
(5)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28,917
|
|
|
|
28,917
|
|
|
|
28,917
|
|
|
|
28,917
|
|
|
Salary
Continuation Agreement
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
37,194
|
(6)
|
|
|
37,194
|
(2)
|
|
|
37,194
|
(6)
|
|
|
1,348,507
|
(7)
|
|
Income
attributable to vesting of stock awards
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
Total
severance payment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
754,329
|
|
|
$
|
1,660,938
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
1,044,885
|
|
|
$
|
1,985,554
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents
the total value of payments that would be paid ratably over a two-year
period.
|
|
(2)
|
Benefits
have been calculated based on the date the agreement would have expired
had the executive’s employment not terminated due to his
disability.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents
the amount earned under the 2008 Management Incentive Plan and payable to
the executive’s beneficiary.
|
|
(4)
|
The
amount shown does not reflect adjustments that would be made to the
executive’s total change in control severance payment to insure the
executive’s severance payment would not be deemed an “excess parachute
payment” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
Code.
|
|
(5)
|
Represents
the accrued balance that would be paid under the Transition Credit
Retirement Plan for Designated Employees.
|
|
(6)
|
Represents
the cash surrender value of the executive’s life insurance policy under
the agreement.
|
|
(7)
|
Represents
the present value of the monthly payments to be made to Mr. Miller’s
beneficiary for 146 months. The present value was calculated using a 6.9%
discount
rate.
|
The
following table provides the amount of compensation payable to Mr. Bush for each
of the situations listed below as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
Due Upon
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
for
Cause
|
|
Termination
without
Cause
or for
Good
Reason
|
|
Change
in Control
with
Termination
of
Employment
|
|
Disability
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Base
salary
|
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
624,000
|
(1)
|
$
|
936,000
|
|
$
|
411,840
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Bonuses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
90,000
|
(1)
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27,300
|
(3)
|
|
Medical,
life and dental insurance benefits
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32,856
|
|
|
49,284
|
|
|
32,856
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Income
attributable to vesting of stock awards
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
Total
severance payment
|
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
746,856
|
|
$
|
1,682,784
|
(4)
|
$
|
1,007,196
|
|
$
|
589,800
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents
the total value of payments that would be paid ratably over a two-year
period.
|
|
(2)
|
Benefits
have been calculated based on the date the agreement would have expired
had the executive’s employment not terminated due to his
disability.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents
the amount earned under the 2008 Management Incentive Plan and payable to
the executive’s beneficiary.
|
|
(4)
|
The
amount shown does not reflect adjustments that would be made to the
executive’s total change in control severance payment to insure the
executive’s severance payment would not be deemed an “excess parachute
payment” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
Code.
|
The
following table provides the amount of compensation payable to Ms. Kassekert for
each of the situations listed below as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
Due Upon
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
for
Cause
|
|
Termination
without
Cause
or for
Good
Reason
|
|
Change
in Control
with
Termination
of
Employment
|
|
Disability
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Base
salary
|
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
(1)
|
$
|
675,000
|
|
$
|
297,000
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Bonuses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
45,000
|
(3)
|
|
Medical,
life and dental insurance benefits
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
25,550
|
|
|
38,325
|
|
|
25,550
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Income
attributable to vesting of stock awards
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
562,500
|
|
|
|